Psychodrama SWK 6114
Psychodrama SWK 6114
Psychodrama SWK 6114
INTRODUCTION to PSYCHODRAMA,
SOCIOMETRY, and GROUP PSYCHOTHERAPY
SWK 6114
Summer 2020
COURSE DESCRIPTION
The course is designed to explore the bridge between personal narratives, creativity,
and the power of community. In this course students will gain an understanding of the
principles and techniques of psychodrama, sociometry, and group psychotherapy.
Conceived and developed by Jacob L. Moreno, psychodrama employs guided dramatic
action to examine problems or issues raised by an individual or a group. Using
experiential methods, sociometry, role theory, and group dynamics, psychodrama
facilitates insight, personal growth, and integration on cognitive, affective, and
behavioral levels. It clarifies issues, increases physical and emotional wellbeing and
enhances learning and develops new skills.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
By the end of the course, the students will be able to demonstrate:
1. Their understanding of the connection between social work practice and
psychodrama, sociometry, and group psychotherapy
2. Their understanding of the philosophy underlying psychodrama, sociometry, and
group psychotherapy. Additionally, students will learn the historical development of
this modality.
3. Their competence in articulating and applying key concepts of different
psychodramatic techniques
4. Their understanding of how to integrate psychodramatic techniques with diverse
populations in various settings.
COURSE EXPECTATIONS
•Dayton, T. & Moreno, Z., (2004). The living stage: A step-by-step guide to
psychodrama, sociometry and group psychotherapy. Deerfield Beach, FL: Health
Communications. $19.00
Supplemental Texts:
COURSE REQUIREMENTS
There will be two assignments for this course, a mid-term paper due class 7 and a final
paper due at the end of the semester. The specific requirements of each written
assignment will be distributed to you by the instructor. Late papers will result in lower
grades.
Class Participation: 35%
Mid-term Assignment: 30%
Final Assignment: 35%
Students with disabilities who are enrolled in this course and who will be requesting
documented disability-related accommodations are asked to make an appointment
with the Office of Disability Services, Rochelle Kohn, Beren Campus, (646) 592-4132,
rkohn1@yu.edu, Abby Kelsen, Wilf Campus, (646)592-4280, akelsen@yu.edu, during
the first week of class. After approval for accommodations is granted, please submit
your accommodations letter to Disability Services Office immediately.
PLAGIARISM:
Students should remember that the School will not condone plagiarism in any form
and will sanction acts of plagiarism. A student who presents someone else's work as
his or her own work is stealing from the authors or persons who did the original
thinking and writing. Plagiarism occurs when a student directly copies another's work
without citation; when a student paraphrases major aspects of another's work without
citation; and when a student combines the work of different authors into a new
statement without reference to those authors. It is also plagiarism to use the ideas
and/or work of another student and present them as your own. It is not plagiarism to
formulate your own presentation of an idea or concept as a reaction to someone else's
work; however, the work to which you are reacting should be discussed and
appropriately cited. Any student who can be shown to have plagiarized any part of any
assignment in this course will automatically FAIL the course and will be referred to the
Associate Dean for disciplinary action, which may include expulsion.
In line with the new HIPAA regulations concerning protected health information, it is
important that you understand that any case information you present from your work
will need to be de-identified. What this means is that any information that would allow
another to identify the person needs to be changed or eliminated. This includes obvious
things like names and birth dates but may also contain other information that is so
unique to the person that it will allow for identification, including diagnosis,
race/ethnicity, or gender. If diagnosis, race/ethnicity, gender is directly related to the
case presentation it can be included if it will not allow for identification.
COURSE OUTLINE
Content Covered:
Required Readings:
Blatner: Chapters 1, 2,
Dayton: Chapter 1, 2,
Konopik, D.A. & Cheung, M. (2013). Psychodrama as a Social Work Modality. Journal
Social Work, 58(1): 9-20.
Content Covered:
• Doubling
• Moreno’s theory of personality
Blatner: Chapters 3, 4
Dayton: Chapter 3
Content Covered:
Required Readings:
Blatner: Chapters 7,
Dayton: Chapter 4
Content Covered:
• Spectrogram
• Logogram
• Circle step-in
• Action sociogram
• Tele
Required Readings:
Dayton: Chapters 6, 8
Content Covered
Required Readings:
Dayton: Chapter 7
Content Covered:
Required Readings:
Dayton: Chapter 11
Content Covered:
• Canon of creativity
Dayton: Chapter 5
Content Covered:
Required Readings:
Blatner: Chapter 9
Barbour, A. (1992). Purpose and strategy behind the magic shop. Journal of Group
Psychotherapy, Psychodrama & Sociometry, 45(3), 91-101.
Moreno, J.L. (1965). Therapeutic Vehicles and the Concept of Surplus Reality. Group
Psychotherapy 18: 211-216
Content Covered:
• Therapeutic factors
• Mutual aid
• Stages of group development
Required Readings:
Drumm, K. (2006). The essential power of group work. Social Work with Groups, 29(2/3), 17-
31.
Kurland, R. (2008). Debunking the “blood theory” of social work with groups: Group
workers are made and not born. Social Work with Groups 30(1), 11-24
Papell, C. (2015). More than 60 years with social group work: Personal and professional
history. Social Work with Groups,38(3-4), 201-219
Rossi-Berman, T. (1993). The tasks and skills of the social worker across stages of
group. development. Social Work with Groups, 16(1/2), 69-81
Content Covered:
Required Readings:
Contents Covered:
Required Readings:
Abels, P. (2013). History of the Standards for Social Work Practice with Groups: Partial
View. Social Work with Groups 36(2-3): 259-269
Akinsola, E. F., & Udoka, P. A. (2013). Parental influence on social anxiety in children
and adolescents: Its assessment and management using psychodrama.
Psychology, 4(3A), 246-253.
Andrews, J. (2001). Group Work’s Place in Social Work: A Historical Analysis. Journal of
Sociology and Social Welfare 28(4): 45-65,
Baim, C. (2007). Integrating Psychodrama with Attachment Theory: Implications for
Practice. In P. Holmes, M. Farrall, & K. Kirk (Eds.), Empowering Therapeutic
Practice: Integrating Psychodrama into other Therapies (pp. 125-156). London:
Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Berger, M. (1990). J. L. Moreno’s autobiography: More than meets the eye. Journal of
Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 42(4), 213-221.
Birnbaum, M. L., & Wayne, J. (2000). Group work in foundation generalist education:
The necessity for curriculum change. Journal of Social Work Education, 36(2),
347–356.
Bitel, M.C. (2000). Mixing Up the Goulash: Essential Ingredients in the “Art” of Social
Group Work. Social Work With Groups, 22:2-3, 77-99
Boria, G. (1989). Conceptual training in psychodrama training. Journal of Group
Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 42(3), 166-172.
Brown, T. M. (2007). Psychoanalysis and Psychodrama. In P. Holmes, M. Farrall, & K.
Kirk (Eds.), Empowering Therapeutic Practice: Integrating Psychodrama into
other Therapies (pp. 227-250). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Buchanan, D. R. (1980). The central concern model: A framework for structuring
psychodramatic, production. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and
Sociometry, 45, 47-62.
Buchanan, D. R. & Enneis J. M. (1981). Forty-one years of psychodrama at St. Elizabeths
hospital. Journal of Group Psychotherapy, Psychodrama and Sociometry, 34,
134-146.
Buchanan, D. R. (1984). Moreno’s social atom: A diagnostic tool for exploring
interpersonal relationships. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 27, 173-183.
Buchanan, D.R. (1995). Act hungers and open tension systems: another framework for
structuring psychodramatic production. Unpublished manuscript. 02-32.