The Role of Mitochondria in Apoptosis - PMC
The Role of Mitochondria in Apoptosis - PMC
The Role of Mitochondria in Apoptosis - PMC
Inclusion in an NLM
database does not imply endorsement of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM
or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice
Annu Rev Genet. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2016 Feb 22. PMCID: PMC4762029
Published in final edited form as: NIHMSID: NIHMS757305
Annu Rev Genet. 2009; 43: 95–118. PMID: 19659442
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134850
*
The Role of Mitochondria in Apoptosis
Chunxin Wang and Richard J. Youle
Abstract
Mitochondria play key roles in activating apoptosis in mammalian cells. Bcl-2 family mem‐
bers regulate the release of proteins from the space between the mitochondrial inner and out‐
er membrane that, once in the cytosol, activate caspase proteases that dismantle cells and
signal efficient phagocytosis of cell corpses. Here we review the extensive literature on pro‐
teins released from the intermembrane space and consider genetic evidence for and against
their roles in apoptosis activation. We also compare and contrast apoptosis pathways in
Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, and mammals that indicate major mys‐
teries remaining to be solved.
INTRODUCTION
It is normal to give away a little of one’s life in order not to lose it all.
—Albert Camus
:
Life and death is not just a continuous subject of philosophy but also a tough decision our
built-in cellular machinery has to make every moment. Whereas single-cell organisms try to
survive by rapid propagation, multicellular organisms have evolved a self-demise mechanism
to remove infected, damaged, and unwanted cells so that the whole can better survive. This
programmed cell death follows specific patterns such as shrinkage of the cell, margination of
chromatin, and nuclear fragmentation and was dubbed apoptosis (64). We have witnessed
explosive progress over the past two decades in the field, not only because apoptosis is an
evolutionarily conserved mechanism that governs normal body sculpture, homeostasis, de‐
fense against pathogen invasion, and genotoxic stress but also because deregulation of apop‐
tosis leads to cancer and immune diseases.
At the heart of apoptosis regulation is the activation of caspases, a group of cysteine proteas‐
es that can cleave many cellular substrates to dismantle cell contents (112). Caspases exist as
inactive zymogens or proenzymes. During apoptosis, the procaspase is proteolytically
cleaved to generate a small subunit and a large subunit. The two cleaved fragments form a
heterotetramer, which is the active form of the enzyme. Activation of caspases is a down‐
stream event in apoptosis pathways and blocking caspase activity has been shown to elimi‐
nate almost all programmed developmental cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans (154).
Hence, activation of caspases must be and is indeed under tight control. There are two major
apoptotic pathways: extrinsic and intrinsic pathways responding to different signals in verte‐
brates (see sidebar, Extrinsic apoptosis pathway). The intrinsic pathway is also called the mi‐
tochondrial pathway owing to the essential involvement of mitochondria (Figure 1), which is
not only the site where antiapoptotic and proapoptotic proteins interact and determine cell
fates, but also the origin of signals that initiate the activation of caspases through various
mechanisms. For example, cytochrome c (Cyt c) is a key component of the apoptosome com‐
plex for activation of the initiator caspase-9. After release from mitochondria, Smac (second
mitochondria-derived activator of caspase) and Omi can both bind to inhibitors of apoptosis
(IAPs) and relieve their inhibitory effects on caspase activity. These mitochondrial proteins
are not dedicated killers, and they perform various essential mitochondrial functions for nor‐
mal cell growth. The spatial separation of mitochondrial proteins from their interacting part‐
ners or targets is a safeguard mechanism to prevent unwanted activation of apoptosis in
healthy cells. Only after appropriate release can they switch to become lethal.
:
Figure 1
The role of mitochondria in apoptosis in three model systems. In Caenorhabditis elegans, Ced-4 is con‐
stantly bound by Ced-9 on the mitochondrial outer membrane in healthy cells. Ced-3 is bound by Csp-3, a
caspase homolog without the large subunit to prevent inadvertent Ced-3 auto-activation. Egl-1, a BH3-
only protein, is transcriptionally regulated during development or in response to apoptotic stimuli. Egl-1
binds to Ced-9 to displace Ced-4, which is now free to form a tetramer and is capable of activating Ced-3
to trigger cell death. Csp-3 is displaced by Ced-4 and its inhibitory effect on Ced-3 is removed. Mean‐
while, Csp-6 and Wah-1 are possibly released from mitochondria and trigger caspase-independent molec‐
ular events to facilitate the dismantling of the cell content, such as nuclear DNA fragmentation and phos‐
phatidylserine (PS) exposure for signaling cell engulfment. In Drosophila, the caspases (Dronc and
Drice) are ubiquitinated by Diap-1 for proteosomal degradation in healthy cells. Upon developmental or
apoptotic signals, Reaper, Hid, and Grim (RHG) genes are transcriptionally induced, and the proteins
translocate to mitochondria to recruit Diap-1 for interaction. The membrane association of RHG proteins
has been shown to be required for RHG-mediated Diap-1 auto-ubiquitination and degradation. Mean‐
while, Cyt c might be released or remain on the surface of the mitochondrial outer membrane after some
conformational changes, which now can bind to Dark and trigger apoptosome formation. dOmi might be
released or remain on the mitochondria and interact with Diap-1 to further free the caspases from Diap-1
inhibition. DmAIF is released to trigger caspase-independent events. Sickle and Jafrac2 behave like RHG
proteins, but Jafrac is localized to the ER (127). Localization of Sickle is not clear. In healthy cells of ver‐
tebrates, Apaf-1 is in an auto-inhibited form and any basally processed caspase-9 and caspase-3/7 are
bound by XIAP and hence, remain inactive. Upon apoptotic signaling, BH3-only proteins are either up‐
regulated transcriptionally or activated through post-translational modification. They then bind to anti‐
apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins to remove their inhibitory effect or activate Bax/Bak directly. Protein-lipid inter‐
action might also be involved in Bax/Bak activation, which leads to their oligomerization and triggers re‐
lease of Cyt c, Smac/DIABLO, endoG, AIF, and Omi/HtrA2. Cytosolic Cyt c then binds to Apaf-1 to in‐
duce apoptosome formation, leading to caspase-9 and caspase-3/7 activation. Smac/DIABLO and
Omi/HtrA2 bind to XIAP to remove its inhibitory effect. Ortholog proteins in different species are labeled
in the same color.
Many topics regarding the regulation of mitochondrial function by the B cell lymphoma-2
(Bcl-2) family proteins, the roleBack
of mitochondrial
to Top morphology in apoptosis, the mitochondri‐
al outer membrane permeability (MOMP), and permeability transition pore complex (PTPC)
have been recently reviewed (19, 73, 121, 152). Therefore, here we mainly focus on the mito‐
chondrial proteins that are released during apoptosis and whether or not mitochondria play
similar essential roles in invertebrate cell death. Emphasis is made on genetic data so that
genes’ physiological roles can be fairly dissected. We also discuss challenges that are re‐
quired to solve some remaining mysteries.
:
A BRIEF HISTORY
In their seminal paper, Kerr et al. stated that mitochondria appear to be normal during apop‐
tosis (64). Hence, it was originally assumed that cellular suicide was controlled at the nuclear
level. However, it was soon found that de novo translation and transcription are dispensable
in most models of apoptosis. In addition, apoptosis occurs normally in enucleated cells (59),
implying that apoptosis must be regulated at the cytoplasmic level. The first hint that apopto‐
sis might be regulated at the mitochondrial level came when Bcl-2 was reported to be local‐
ized in the mitochondrial inner membrane (actually it is on the outer membrane) (52), and
the lack of the C-terminal transmembrane domain reduced the ability of Bcl-2 to inhibit
apoptosis (53). Cell-free apoptosis in Xenopus egg extracts was later shown to require an or‐
ganelle fraction enriched in mitochondria (99). Soon, mitochondrial permeability transition
(PT) was reported to be a critical event of apoptosis as the point-of-no-return (74), and mito‐
chondrial control of apoptosis was proposed (156). In the same year, Cyt c was found to be
essential for caspase activation by Xiaodong Wang’s group (86). Only one year later, back-to-
back papers demonstrated that the release of Cyt c from mitochondria is a primary site for
Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis (69, 146), firmly establishing an active role of mitochondria in
apoptosis.
feedback loop by caspases positively regulating the upstream events. In our opinion, this am‐
plification loop actually further demonstrates the central role of mitochondria in apoptosis.
The mitochondrial pathway acts in response to death stimuli including DNA damage,
chemotherapeutic agents, serum starvation, and UV radiation. In certain cell types, the ex‐
trinsic pathway, initiated by cell surface receptors such as Fas, can cross talk with the intrin‐
sic pathway through caspase-8 mediated cleavage of Bid, resulting in truncated tBid that will
translocate to mitochondria and trigger Cyt c release (81, 89).
Shortly after the discovery that the primary antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 was to block Cyt
c release, the central question was: How does Bcl-2 do this at the molecular level? It turns
out there is a large family of Bcl-2 homologs that can be divided into two classes: antiapop‐
totic Bcl-2 family proteins (such as Bcl-XL, Bcl-w, Mcl-1, A1, Bcl-Rambo, Bcl-L10, and
Bcl-G) and proapoptotic proteins (such as Bax, Bak, and Bok) (21). A more heterogeneous
group of proteins sharing a BH3 motif called the BH3 family of proteins (such as Puma,
:
Noxa, Bid, Bad, Bim, Bik, Hrk, and Bmf) bind and inhibit the core antiapoptotic Bcl-2 pro‐
teins and hence act as proapoptotic proteins (152). The crucial role of Bax/Bak in apoptosis
induction was reflected by the extreme resistance of bax−/− bak−/− DKO cells to a variety of
apoptotic stimuli (135). It appears that BH3-only proteins and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins
are positive and negative regulators of Bax/Bak, respectively. Neither activation of BH3-only
proteins nor suppression of prosurvival Bcl-2 proteins is sufficient to kill cells in the absence
of both Bax and Bak (160), suggesting that Bax/Bak are the key regulatory targets where
many intracellular signals converge and determine the fate of the cell.
In healthy cells, Bax is localized in the cytosol as a monomer. During apoptosis, Bax translo‐
cates to mitochondria (54, 140) and undergoes conformational changes to form oligomers
(3), appearing as foci on mitochondria (Figure 2). In contrast, Bak constantly resides on mi‐
tochondria but does go through a series of conformational changes to oligomerize during
apoptosis (45). Bax translocation and Cyt c release are regarded as two key upstream molec‐
ular events of apoptosis. Two models have been proposed regarding how BH3-only proteins
activate Bax/Bak. The direct activation model states that Bax/Bak can be activated directly
by Bim, Bid, and Puma or by other BH3-only proteins through releasing Bim/Bid/Puma from
association with antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (65). The indirect model proposes that Bax/Bak
become active when the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins are bound by BH3-only proteins (138).
Although evidence exists for and against either model, both models are based on the direct
interactions among the three groups of proteins, which are in many cases identified through
overexpression or synthetic BH3 domain peptides or Co-IP in the presence of detergents.
This is particularly problematic when growing evidence suggests that a lipid environment is
required for effective interactions among those proteins (19). In an “embedding together”
model, it was speculated that Bax/Bak go through multiple, regulated conformational
changes before assuming a final conformation necessary for membrane permeabilization
(78). There is equilibrium between different conformers, which can be affected by interac‐
tions with BH3-only proteins. Hence, both pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins en‐
gage in similar dynamic interactions that are governed by membrane-dependent conforma‐
tional changes. It was reported that the mitochondria-specific lipid, cardiolipin, provides
specificity for targeting tBid to mitochondria (90). Cardiolipin also serves as an anchor and
activation platform for caspase-8 targeting and embedding in the mitochondrial membrane
where it oligomerizes to be activated (41), indicating the importance of protein-lipid interac‐
tion. Recently, it was shown that tBid rapidly binds to the membrane in vitro, then interacts
with Bax, which triggers Bax insertion into membrane and oligomerization, culminating in
membrane permeabilization (87). However, it is still not clear how oligomeric Bax and Bak
induce membrane permeabilization and Cyt c release.
:
Figure 2
Bax translocation and Cyt c release during apoptosis. In healthy Hela cells, Bax (red) is mainly in the cy‐
tosol whereas Cyt c (green) resides inside the mitochondria (indicated by the arrow). Bax translocates to
the mitochondria and forms foci whereas Cyt c is released from the mitochondria into the cytosol (indicat‐
ed by the arrowhead) during apoptosis. (a) Immunofluorescence staining with anti-Bax antibody. (b) Im‐
munofluorescence staining with anti-Cyt c antibody.
It was initially thought that mitochondrial membrane permeability might originate from a
sudden increase in the permeability of the inner membrane to low molecular mass solutes
because of the opening of a multiprotein pore PTP at the contact site between the outer mem‐
brane and inner membrane (38). The exact molecular composition of this complex is not
clear and assumed to contain hexokinase, voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC, on the
outer membrane), the adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT, in the inner membrane), and cy‐
clophilin D (CypD, a peptidyl-prolyl isomerase in the matrix). Opening of PTP leads to ma‐
trix swelling, depolarization of the membrane potential (dissipation of the Δψm built across
the inner membrane), subsequent rupture of the outer membrane, and nonselective release of
IMS (intermembrane space) proteins. Although some biochemical data and studies with
pharmacological inhibitors support a role of PTP (73), growing evidence, especially genetic
analysis, suggests that PTP opening is likely a consequence of apoptosis. For example,
VDAC1/VDAC2/VDAC3 triple KO mice display normal apoptosis without changes in PTP
opening (8) (Table 1). Cells deficient in cyclophilin-D die normally after apoptotic treatment
but show resistance to necrotic cell death (7, 98). Moreover, ANT KO mice have normal PTP
(71). Also, Cyt c release occurs in the absence of mitochondria depolarization and without
loss of outer membrane integrity (146).
:
Table 1
Phenotypes of mice or cells deficient in mitochondria proteins other than Bcl-2 family members
Three-dimensional structures of the Bcl-2 proteins (both anti- and proapoptotic proteins such
as Bcl-xL, Bax) resemble that of bacteria toxins, proteins that can punch holes in the mem‐
branes to kill cells (96). The consensus now is that Bax oligomerization is required for Cyt c
release (31). In cell-free systems, Bax, Bid, and lipids cooperate to form supramolecular
openings (allow passage of up to 2000-kDa molecules) in the outer mitochondrial membrane
(76), which can be directly inhibited by Bcl-xL. Such large openings shall allow release of all
soluble IMS proteins without any selective preference. Mitochondrial apoptosisinduced chan‐
nel (MAC) was also proposed to be responsible for release of IMS proteins (67), which con‐
tain Bax and Bak as the putative components. Nonetheless, the biochemical nature of either
MAC or oligomeric Bax/Bak-induced pores remains unknown. Irrespective of the nature of
the permeability, a series of proteins is released from mitochondria during apoptosis as dis‐
cussed below, which are essential for proper execution of apoptosis.
Cytochrome c
:
Cytochrome c (Cyt c) is an essential component of the mitochondrial electron transport
chain. It is translated as apocytochrome c and then translocated into the mitochondrial IMS.
Once inside the IMS, a heme group is attached to form the holocytochrome c. It is the heme
moiety that acts as a redox intermediate to shuttle electrons between complex III (Cyt b-c1
complex) and complex IV (Cyt c oxidase complex).
When mitochondria were suggested to be required for apoptosis (99), no one expected Cyt c
would play a pivotal role until it was identified as one of the three apoptotic protease activat‐
ing factors (Apafs) for caspase activation by Xiaodong Wang’s group (86). It led to the find‐
ing that many other IMS proteins are also released from mitochondria during apoptosis (see
below).
Although originally greeted with skepticism, the role of Cyt c in apoptosis has been estab‐
lished both biochemically and genetically. First, purified Cyt c can trigger caspase activity in
a cell-free system using extracts from healthy nonapoptotic cells (86). Second, in vitro apop‐
tosome activity has been reconstituted with recombinant Cyt c, Apaf-1, and caspase-9 pro‐
teins in the presence of ATP/dATP (84). Cyt c deficient mice are embryonic lethal owing to
Cyt c’s indispensable role in mitochondria electron transport chain. Nonetheless, cyt c−/
−
MEFs exhibit resistance to a variety of apoptotic stimuli (82). Later, a knockin mouse mod‐
el was made with Cyt c K72A (49) (Table 1). The Cyt c K72A (KA) mutation largely abol‐
ishes the interaction with its receptor, Apaf-1, and hence reduces caspase-3 activity by ten‐
fold in vitro, whereas it remains fully functional in shuttling electrons in the mitochondria
respiration chain. KA mice were born at a frequency of 12%, with developmental defects ap‐
parent in KA/KA embryonic brains, displaying ectopic masses with exencephalic defects and
expansions of the cortex and midbrain. The exencephalic phenotype of postnatal day 1
KA/KA mice recapitulates that of apaf-1−/− and casp-9−/− mice (15, 47, 75, 150), strongly
indicating that Cyt c acts in the same pathway. Like bim−/− and bax−/− bak−/−DKO (11, 85),
KA mice also exhibit splenomegaly and lymphadenopathy. Normal Cyt c release and respira‐
tory function were found in KA mice, but caspase activation is impaired, and Apaf-1
oligomerization was not observed in response to UV or staurosporine (STS) treatment. How‐
ever, thymocytes from KA mice were normally sensitive to dexamethasone, etoposide, and
gamma and UV radiation, whereas apaf-1−/− thymocytes exhibited a partial resistance to all
of these stimuli. One possibility is that the Cyt c K72A mutant is still capable of activating
caspase-3 in thymocytes. However, Apaf-1 oligomerization remains impaired in KA thymo‐
cytes, suggesting the existence of apoptosome-independent pathways of caspase activation.
This is consistent with the observation that Bcl-2 overexpression increased lymphocyte num‐
bers in mice and inhibited many apoptotic stimuli to a greater extent than seen in apaf-1−/−
or casp-9−/− KO mice (91).
Soon after identification of Apaf-1, it was found that Apaf-1 and Casp-9 form a large com‐
plex in the presence of Cyt c and dATP (84). Based on crystal structures of both Apaf-1
alone and the apoptosome complex, it seems that the nonactive Apaf-1 protein may exist in a
:
compact and closed form, probably through intramolecular interaction with the N-terminal
CARD domain sandwiched in the lobes of the C-terminal WD40 repeats (9). Hence, the
buried CARD domain is not accessible to procaspase-9. Deletion of this WD40 domain re‐
sults in Apaf-1 constitutively binding and activating caspase-9, indicating that the Apaf-1
monomer is in an auto-inhibited state (9, 55). Upon Cyt c binding to the WD40 region, the
CARD domain is displaced, leading to an open conformation. Then, ATP/dATP bound to the
nucleotide-binding domain undergoes hydrolysis to induce conformational changes (66), cre‐
ating a less flexible, locked form. The Apaf-1 in this new conformation coassembles with six
other subunits to form a symmetric wheel-shaped structure, a platform ready to recruit pro‐
caspase-9 to form the active apoptosome (116).
Apparently, Cyt c is at the heart of Apaf-1-mediated caspase activation and thus, the regula‐
tion of Cyt c release is vital in the tightly regulated intrinsic apoptosis pathway. Given that
the majority of Cyt c resides inside the narrow cristae junctions, it was speculated that re‐
lease of Cyt c requires two steps: mobilization and translocation where the mobilization step
might involve cristae remodeling (114). During mobilization, Cyt c detaches from the inner
mitochondria membrane (IMM) and dissociates from the membrane phospholipid cardiolipin
(102). However, it is not clear how Cyt c detaches from the IMM and how important cardi‐
olipin is in retaining Cyt c.
It has long been reported that mitochondrial fission machinery actively participates in the
process of apoptosis (151), and the topic of mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis has been
recently reviewed (121). Since then, new discoveries have shed fresh light on how Cyt c is
released after oligomerized Bax/Bak-induced outer membrane permeability. It was originally
thought that cristae junctions must become wider to allow passage of Cyt c from the in‐
tracristae space into the intermembrane space given that more than 85% Cyt c resides within
cristae. Indeed, it was shown that cristae junctions became wider during apoptosis and are
independent of Bak (114). However, the hole of cristae junctions in normal mitochondria is
big enough to allow 60–100 kD proteins to go through (67), suggesting that it would be un‐
necessary to widen the cristae junctions. Several reports have reported that Cyt c release oc‐
curred prior to large-scale cristae remodeling, which is actually caspase-dependent (indicat‐
ing it takes place at a later stage of apoptosis) (122, 143). Moreover, a recent report found
that cristae junctions became narrower instead of wider during apoptosis (142). It was pro‐
posed that the width of cristae junctions was regulated by the Opa1 protein, a protein in‐
volved in mitochondrial fusion (35). When Opa1 assembles into a larger complex, the cristae
junctions are wider and in a closed state. When Opa1 disassembles, the junctions become
narrower but are in an open state to allow increased availability of Cyt c at the outer mem‐
brane (142). In support of this, a mutant Opa1Q297V (which is disassembly resistant) can
protect cells from cell death by preventing Cyt c release (and the release of other IMS pro‐
teins such as Smac and Omi) without affecting Bax activation (142). To verify the impor‐
tance of this inhibition on Cyt c release under physiological condition, a knockin mouse
model with Opa1Q297V mutation would be useful for comparison with Cyt c KA mice re‐
garding resistance to apoptosis to clarify whether Opa1 disassembly plays a vital role in con‐
:
trolling Cyt c release. Consistently, the mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 was also reported
to be involved in cristae remodeling (40). In addition, knockdown of Drp1, although not af‐
fecting Bax activation, inhibited Cyt c release but not Smac release (79, 104, 33). This is dif‐
ferent from Opa1Q297V-mediated inhibition of Cyt c release (as the latter also inhibits Smac
release). However, it remains possible that Drp1 acts through Opa1, and epistasis experi‐
ments between these two proteins in controlling Cyt c release await to be performed.
Smac/DIABLO
Smac was identified by its ability to enhance Cyt c-mediated caspase-3 activation (27).
Vaux’s lab independently identified the same protein, which they named DIABLO, through
Co-IP with XIAP (132). Apparently, Smac/DIABLO facilitates caspase activation by binding
to XIAP (and other IAPs such as cIAP1 and cIAP2) and hence, relieves caspases (both cas‐
pase-9 and caspase-3) from inhibitory effects of IAPs (119). It turn out that XIAP cannot
bind and inhibit procaspase-9, but instead sequesters or triggers the proteolytic processing of
mature caspase-9. Therefore, Smac could compete with mature caspase-9 for interaction with
XIAP (as the binding is mutually exclusive) and lead to the release of mature caspase-9 from
the grip of XIAP (120). On the other hand, XIAP can polyubiquitinate both mature caspase-9
and Smac (95), indicating the battle between these factors may decide whether cells will die.
However, some intriguing observations bring more complexity to the mechanisms underlying
Smac function. First, it was found that XIAP mutants that are defective in caspase-3 inhibi‐
tion but retain Smac- and caspase-9 binding were still cytoprotective (117). Other studies
reported similar results with different IAPs, indicating that IAPs can suppress cell death
through caspase inhibition and inhibition of Smac (28). However, it is unclear if these IAPs
mutants can still bind caspase-7 or Omi/HtrA2. Second, Smac beta, a splicing variant that
lacks the mitochondria targeting sequences and does not bind IAPs, can still sensitize cells to
apoptosis (109), suggesting that Smac could function other than solely as IAPs’ antagonist.
Third, another splicing variant, Smac3 [missing 44 residues right after the IAP-binding motif
(IBM) of Smac], acts similar to Smac, but can trigger XIAP autoubiquitination and destruc‐
tion (36). Finally, the physiological role of Smac in apoptosis was brought into doubt by the
normal phenotype of Smac KO mice (100) (Table 1). However, more detailed characteriza‐
tion of the Smac KO mice is required to make sure other splicing variants or potential trun‐
cated proteins are not produced in the KO mice. This is particularly important as a previous
study has implied that Smac may function other than binding IAP through the C-terminal
domain. Another possibility why the Smac KO mice fail to show any antiapoptotic pheno‐
type could be simply owing to redundancy of other proteins. In support of this, in vitro cas‐
pase-3 activation is impaired in Smac KO lysates, whereas in vivo caspase-3 can be normally
processed in KO MEFs or other cell types. Nonetheless, Smac−/− HCT116 cells are resistant
to certain apoptotic stimuli and, interestingly, Cyt c and AIF release are delayed in these KO
cells (70) (Table 1).
:
Like Cyt c, the release of Smac is caspase-independent (108). In agreement, Zhou et al. re‐
ported that Smac and Cyt c release proceeds in the same narrow window (5–6 min) (159).
However, fibroblast growth factor FGF-2 can block Smac but not Cyt c release in etoposide
treated SCLC cells (103). Activation of JNK induces generation of a novel Bid cleaved frag‐
ment jBid, which translocates to mitochondria and triggers Smac but not Cyt c release (25).
Smac then disrupts the TRAF2-cIAP1 complex to trigger Cyt c-independent cell death. Con‐
sistently, overexpression of BidΔ25, which mimics jBid, induces Smac release but not Cyt c.
This is another example of how the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways are interconnected. On
the other hand, Drp1 inhibition prevents Cyt c release more than Smac release (104). These
examples of selective release of IMS proteins argue against the nonselective model of
Bax/Bak-induced MOMP or indicate the existence of an additional regulation level beyond
the supramolecular openings.
Omi/HtrA2
Omi was originally identified as a human homolog of the bacterial HtrA2 (high temperature
requirement A) gene that interacts with Mxi2 (32). Later, HtrA2/Omi was independently
identified by three groups as a novel XIAP-binding protein (51, 92, 125) and as an additional
proapoptotic protein released from mitochondria into the cytosol by tBid treatment (130).
Omi/HtrA2 transports into mitochondria as a precursor protein with the N-terminus exposed
to the matrix and the majority of the C-terminus containing the protease domain facing the
intermembrane space. A transmembrane domain near the N-terminus tethers Omi/HtrA2 to
the inner membrane followed by an IBM which will be exposed in the IMS after processing
by an unknown mitochondrial protease(s) at residue 133 (131). Interestingly, more than half
of the Omi protein remains unprocessed in mouse liver, whereas most Omi/HtrA2 is pro‐
cessed in heart tissue and in 293 cells (60).
It has been proposed that, unlike Smac/DIABLO, Omi/HtrA2 can irreversibly degrade IAP
through its protease activity in addition to sequestering IAPs through IBM binding. IBM-de‐
ficient mutants cleave recombinant cIAP1 10 times less efficiently than the wild-type Omi
(147). Contradictory data have been reported regarding whether overexpression of
Omi/HtrA2 triggers apoptosis. On the one hand, it was shown that extramitochondrially ex‐
:
pressed Omi/HtrA2 only induced atypical cell death whereas protease-inactive mutant
Omi/HtrA2 lost cell-killing activity. The atypical cell death was not inhibited by XIAP or z-
VAD, indicating it is caspase-independent (125). On the other hand, it was reported that
knockdown of Omi leads to resistance of cells to apoptosis, whereas overexpression of Omi
enhances apoptosis (51). Both protease activity and IAP-binding activity of Omi/HtA2 are
required for killing, although via caspase-independent and -dependent pathways, respectively.
However, both naturally occurring Omi/HtrA2 mutant mice and gene targeting mice failed to
show any expected apoptotic phenotype and actually showed the opposite, excessive apopto‐
sis (Table 1). In mnd2 mice, a S276C mutation in Omi almost abolishes all protease activity.
The mnd2 mutant mice exhibit muscle wasting and neurodegeneration, and die by 40 days
after birth. Degenerating neurons in the mutant mice display mixed features of necrosis and
apoptosis. In addition, mnd2 MEFs are more sensitive to apoptosis (60). In gene targeted
Omi KO mice, similar defects were observed such as weight loss, smaller organ size, and
striatal neuron loss. KO mouse cells exhibit increased sensitivity to cell death (including fi‐
broblasts and lymphocytes) (93). Does Smac compensate for Omi’s function in the KO cells?
smac−/− omi−/− DKO mice display a phenotype similar to that of Omi KO mice, and the
DKO cells are more sensitive to etoposide (93). The structural similarity between Omi and
bacterial HtrA suggests that Omi may be a sensor of unfolding stresses in the mitochondria.
Loss of Omi may lead to accumulation of misfolded and damaged proteins, and mitochondri‐
al dysfunction. Hence, the role of Omi/HtrA2 in normal mitochondrial maintenance might
mask its apoptotic function in these mutant mice given that the two functions could counter‐
act each other. A better approach might be to generate a knockin mouse model with a muta‐
tion that blocks its release from mitochondria.
Moreover, the role of IAPs in mammalian apoptosis has been brought into question. Al‐
though Omi/HtrA2 can bind and degrade cIAP1, cIAP2, and XIAP in vitro, XIAP seems to
be the only bona fide inhibitor of caspase-3, −7, and −9 (29). Nonetheless, XIAP-deficient
mice lack a clear apoptotic phenotype, owing to either redundant roles of cIAP1 and 2 or a
limited physiological role for IAPs in the control of apoptosis (131). In addition, two IAP-
like proteins in C. elegans do not seem to be implicated in apoptosis (131). Apparently, any
apoptotic function of Omi/HtrA2 would depend on how much IAPs contribute to the overall
apoptotic response of tested cells.
EndoG
The name of endonuclease G was derived from its nuclease activity that nicks DNA and
RNA (88). EndoG belongs to the large family of DNA/RNA nonspecific ββα-Me-finger nu‐
cleases (113) and has long been studied with different names including mitochondrial DNA
(RNA) 5′-endonuclease, sugar nonspecific mitochondrial nuclease, mitochondrial nuclease
(NUC1), and mitochondrial endo-exonuclease (88).
:
Recently, interest shifted to the role of en-doG in apoptosis with the discovery that en-doG
appears to be released from mitochondria to facilitate the degradation of nuclear chromatin
(83). How endoG is released and whether the release is dependent on caspase activity are still
under debate. Li et al. first showed that the release of endoG is independent of caspase activi‐
ty as tBid alone in the presence of z-VAD can still trigger endoG release from isolated mito‐
chondria (83). However, Arnoult et al. clearly showed that endoG cannot be released from
isolated Hela mitochondria treated with oligomerized Bax or tBid (6). In vivo, the release of
endoG from mitochondria is strongly inhibited by z-VAD or in apaf-1−/− MEF cells indicat‐
ed by both immunofluorescence staining and Western blotting. Consistently, they found that
endoG mainly resides in the mitochondrial inner membrane and matrix. This suggests that
the endoG release is distinct from that of Cyt c, and requires further processing (as with AIF)
or additional mitochondria inner membrane remodeling during apoptosis.
Once released from mitochondria, the function of endoG is no longer dependent on caspase
activity. Overexpression of cytosolic endoG (without mitochondria localization signal) pro‐
motes cell death characterized with nuclear DNA fragmentation in Hela or CV1 cells (113).
Widlak et al. reported that exonuclease and DNase I can cooperate with endoG in inducing
cell death (137). However, genetic data do not support an essential role of endoG in apopto‐
sis.
Two groups independently generated endoG KO mice and showed that the KO mice are vi‐
able and display no developmental defects (Table 1) (22, 58). MEF cells from endoG−/−mice
are as sensitive to apoptosis as wild-type MEFs. As a consequence, Ekert & Vaux called for
acquitting the role of endoG in apoptosis (30).
AIF
AIF (apoptosis inducing factor) was the second protein found to be released from mitochon‐
dria during apoptosis (124). AIF is a flavin-adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-binding oxidoreduc‐
tase, but neither its FAD-binding ability nor its oxidoreductase activity is required for its
apoptotic function (123).
AIF is a type-I inner mitochondrial membrane protein with the N-terminus facing the matrix
and the C-terminal portion residing in the IMS. During apoptosis, a proteolytic processing
takes place at L101/G102 to produce a soluble AIF protein. Mutations or deletions that block
this processing prevent AIF release. Consistent with this tethering, Arnoult et al. found that
caspase inhibitor z-VAD blocks AIF release from mitochondria both in vivo and in vitro (6).
However, how caspases are involved in triggering AIF release is not clear. Later, several oth‐
er reports challenged this report by showing that AIF release is caspase-independent. The
difference might be due to the concentration of z-VAD being used. Whereas higher doses of
:
z-VAD (100 µM) can lead to nonspecific inhibition of other cysteine proteases that may be
involved in AIF processing (155), lower doses of z-VAD may not be enough to completely
block caspase activity.
After cleaved AIF (also called tAIF) is released from mitochondria, the NLS motif in the
protein allows it to translocate to the nucleus where it interacts with DNA and leads to chro‐
matin condensation and DNA degradation into 50 kb fragments (148). DNA-binding defec‐
tive AIF mutants are still capable of translocating to the nucleus but fail to induce cell death.
It remains a mystery how AIF can degrade DNA as it does not have any intrinsic endonucle‐
ase properties. One possibility is that AIF can recruit downstream nucleases such as endoG
(12).
Although AIF has been extensively studied over the past decade, whether AIF plays an es‐
sential role in apoptosis under physiological conditions remains debated. The initial assign‐
ment of the role of AIF in apoptosis largely derives from in vitro and overexpression studies,
but profound apoptogenic activity of AIF has never been verified in vivo under physiological
conditions.
First, Joza et al. reported that AIF deficient male ES cells (AIF−/y, AIF is on the X chromo‐
some) are impaired in embryo cavitation, as sensitive to many apoptotic stimuli as wild-type
cells, and only exhibit some resistance to serum withdrawal–induced cell death (62). Howev‐
er, using a conditional gene targeting approach, both Joza and Brown et al. showed that AIF
deficient embryos could still form a proaniotic cavity (13, 61) (Table 1). In addition, Brown
et al. argued that the failure of AIF−/y ES cells to generate chimeric mice is largely due to the
essential role of AIF in maintaining normal mitochondrial respiration through its oxidoreduc‐
tase activity.
Harlequin (Hq) mutant mice exhibit ataxia and loss of cerebellar neurons, caused by proviral
insertion into the AIF gene resulting in an 80% reduction in AIF protein. Klein et al. showed
that mutant cerebellar granule cells from these mice are susceptible to oxidativestress in‐
duced apoptosis (68). Hq mice also exhibit partial complex I deficiency, optic tract dysfunc‐
tion, and retinitis pigmentosa, all typical features of mitochondrial disease (10). Recently,
studies with muscle- and liver-specific conditional AIF KO mice indicated that the primary
physiological role of AIF is to maintain a fully functional respiratory chain (106). Further‐
more, human colon cancer cell lines HCT116 and DLD-1 are both derived from males and
AIF−/y cancer cells are more sensitive to DNA damage agents and oxidative stress than wild-
type cells but exhibit normal response to STS and actinomycin D. All these phenotypes can
only be rescued by introduction of AIF that still contains NADH oxidoreductase activity (
Table 1) (128).
−/−
:
Finally, Cheung et al. generated telencephalon conditional AIF−/− mice and showed that AIF
is required for neuronal cell survival and normal mitochondrial respiration in neurons (18).
By analyzing mitochondrial inner membrane-anchored AIF mutants (which cannot be
cleaved and released during apoptosis), they showed that mitochondrial function of AIF is
responsible for Tel. AIF−/− phenotype (cell death and mitochondria dysfunction). None‐
theless, AIF seems to provide limited though significant protection from apoptosis in their
experimental settings. Given the essential role of AIF in normal mitochondria function, to
unambiguously define the role of AIF in apoptosis, one needs to make a cleavage-resistant
AIF mutation and hence one that cannot be released during apoptosis so that its apoptogenic
function is blocked, whereas its oxidoreductase activity remains intact.
Given that key regulators of apoptosis (such as Bcl-2, Apaf-1, and caspases) were found
highly conserved across metazoan species, it was reasonable to expect an evolutionary con‐
servation of cell death mechanisms from worms to humans. A common downstream event is
the activation of caspase proteases, which, by cleaving a large variety of cellular substrates,
initiates many coordinated processes to dismantle cells without triggering inflammatory pro‐
cesses. Whereas it is not surprising that the basic machinery of apoptosis becomes more
elaborate and diversified in mammals than in worms, the seeming lack of involvement of mi‐
tochondria in the activation of caspases in invertebrates is surprising (Figure 1). There are
many controversial data regarding whether or not Cyt c plays any vital role in fly apoptosis.
On the one hand, the essential role of mitochondria in the regulation of caspase activity
might have evolved separately in vertebrates. On the other hand, some unknown reasons may
currently prevent us from revealing the pivotal role of mitochondria in invertebrate apoptosis.
We focus on two major invertebrate model species below, trying to understand whether and
why such a link is missing.
C. elegans
Genetic analysis has firmly established a linear pathway with Egl-1, Ced-9, Ced-4, and Ced-3
as the core executioners of worm cell death. Almost all somatic cell death is blocked in loss-
of-function egl-1, ced-4, and ced-3 null mutants or gain-of-function ced-9 mutants (80). As
in mammals, activation of caspases (Ced-3) in worms also involves a so-called apoptosome
formation even though the complex is much simpler. Genetic and biochemical analyses illus‐
trate a straightforward model for Ced-3 activation. A protein distantly related to Apaf-1, Ced-
4 is constantly bound by the Bcl-2 homolog Ced-9 (2:1 complex) in live cells. An apoptotic
signal upregulates the BH3-only protein Egl-1, which binds Ced-9 to induce significant con‐
formational changes such that Ced-9 dissociates from Ced-4. The freed Ced-4 dimers com‐
plex to form a Ced-4 apoptosome (tetramer), which facilitates the autoactivation of Ced-3
(116, 145). Although how the tetrameric Ced-4 activates Ced-3 remains unclear, two struc‐
tural differences might account for the lack of Cyt c involvement in Ced-3 activation. First,
:
Ced-4 protein does not contain a WD40 repeat domain, which is present in mammalian
Apaf-1 protein and has been shown to be the binding site for Cyt c. Second, the WD40 do‐
main interacting with the CARD domain keeps Apaf-1 monomeric in an auto-inhibition
form. In contrast, Ced-4 is simply bound by Ced-9 to prevent its oligomerization and access
to Ced-3. In vitro, Ced-3 activation can occur with just the addition of Ced-4 (144). Why
Ced-9 is localized on the mitochondrial outer membrane is not clear as it was recently shown
that the mitochondria localization of Ced-9 is not required for interaction between Ced-9 and
Ced-4 (126). Both Ced-9 without the transmembrane domain and Ced-9 artificially tethered
to the cytosolic surface of ER can rescue the phenotype of ced-9 mutants (126). Therefore,
localization of Ced-9 on mitochondria may be required for alternate nonapoptotic functions.
As with mammalian endoG, its homolog in C. elegans, Cps-6 (Ced-3 protease suppressor),
was identified through a sensitized genetic screen with a phenotype of delayed progression of
apoptosis (105). csp-6 alone exhibits an undetectable apoptotic defect but can enhance weak
ced-3 or ced-4 phenotypes, suggesting either a minor role of Csp-6 or the existence of redun‐
dant genes. However, it was not shown if Csp-6 is released from mitochondria during apopto‐
sis. C. elegans also contains an AIF homolog, Wah-1 (worm AIF homolog). wah-1 RNAi
worms exhibit slower growth rates, smaller brood sizes and delayed cell corpse appearance
(134). Wah-1 can cooperate with Cps-6 to efficiently degrade DNA and synergize with Cps-6
to induce cell killing when coexpressed. Although Wah-1 is released from mitochondria in‐
duced by EGL-1 (134), it is not clear how it is released. Interestingly, WAH-1 was also
shown to be involved in phosphatidylserine (PS) externalization (133), consistent with the
previous observation that overexpression of AIF promotes surface PS exposure (123).
As shown above, there is little evidence for an essential role of mitochondria in induction of
C. elegans cell death. However, research in the worm focuses on developmental cell death
while pathogen-stimulated or genotoxic stress-induced apoptosis might utilize distinct mech‐
anisms. For instance, it was recently found that ceramide biogenesis is required for radiation-
induced apoptosis in the germ line of C. elegans (24). In addition, a new layer of regulation
of apoptosis was recently revealed, indicating that worms, although containing no IAP-like
homologs in the genome, do have other inhibitors of caspases. Csp-3, one of the three addi‐
tional caspase-like genes in worms, does not contain a large subunit and shares homology
with the small subunit of Ced-3. Hence, Csp-3 can bind to the large subunit of Ced-3 and
inhibit autoactivation of Ced-3 (39). This acts as a safeguard mechanism to prevent inadver‐
tent Ced-3 autoactivation in cells that normally live. During apoptosis, Ced-4 oligomers can
override Csp-3 inhibition by either competing for Ced-3 binding or inducing Ced-3 confor‐
mational changes to reduce Csp-3 binding. However, loss of Csp-3 only results in a weak
apoptotic phenotype, indicating the existence of redundant genes or a minor role of this kind
of inhibition in normal development. Nonetheless, owing to the lack of IAPs, it is not sur‐
prising that no Smac or Omi/HtrA2 homologs have been found in C. elegans.
Fly
:
In Drosophila, caspase activation is also the core of regulation of apoptosis (149) indicated
by the abolishment of almost all cell death during embryogenesis in the H99 deletion flies
(136), which is due to the concomitant loss of Reaper, Hid, and Grim genes (collectively
called RHG proteins). RHG proteins interact with Drosophila IAPs (mainly the DIAP-1) and
promote DIAP-1 auto-ubiquitination and degradation and hence, prevent DIAP-1 from ubiq‐
uitinating and degrading initiator caspase Dronc (16, 43, 139, 149). Overexpression of any
one of the RHG genes triggers excessive cell death, indicating that the removal of IAP is suf‐
ficient to induce caspase activation and the demise of cells. Consistently, DIAP1 deficiency
leads to spontaneous apoptosis in most fly cells (43, 149). These data led to the concept that
Drosophila caspases might not require activation, but simply relief from potent inhibitors of
caspases. However, in healthy cells, Dark, the Apaf-1 homolog, exists as a monomer, which
is believed to be inactive. It was also shown that unrestrained cell death caused by loss of
DIAP1 required the Apaf-1 homolog Dark (110), suggesting that caspase-dependent cell
death involves concurrent positive input together with removal of IAP’s inhibition. It also
suggests that RHG proteins may promote caspase activation through mechanisms other than
merely antagonizing DIAP1.
Indeed, it was recently reported that Reaper and Hid rapidly permeabilize mitochondria and
release Cyt c in S2 cells (1). One caveat is that the release of Cyt c can only be detected by
immunostaining and not by subcellular fractionation and the release itself is not responsible
for Reaper and Hid-induced apoptosis (1). In addition, actinomycin D or UV failed to trigger
Cyt c release even though caspase activity was high. Mitochondria targeting of RHG proteins
seems to be required for their functions given that Reaper ΔGH3 or Grim ΔGH3, which no
longer bind mitochondria, failed to induce apoptosis (20, 101). In addition, membrane local‐
ization per se contributes to DIAP1 degradation as colocalization of DIAP1 and Reaper at a
membrane surface is critical (34, 101). Surprisingly, RHG proteins are capable of targeting to
mitochondria and inducing Cyt c release in mammalian cells (20, 34, 46), which is Bax/Bak-
independent.
The hunt for a role of Cyt c in fly apoptosis is partly due to the belief of conservation of cell
death mechanisms and partly due to the fact that the Drosophila Apaf-1 homolog Dark also
contains WD40 repeats in the C-terminus, which have been shown to be the Cyt c-binding
site in Apaf-1. In addition, fly Cyt c can functionally substitute for human Cyt c in reconstitu‐
tion of apoptosome activity in mammalian cells (111).
In the absence of added dATP/ATP, incubation of Dark with Dronc results in immediate for‐
mation of the apoptosome. It consists of two wheel-shaped particles assembled face to face,
each involving eight molecules of Dark. Dark may merely function as a scaffold to bind
Dronc and facilitate its maturation through autocatalytic cleavages (153). The CARD domain
of Dronc is removed in the mature caspase (97), suggesting a mode of activation different
from that of caspase-9. Unfortunately, reconstitution of a functional apoptosome complex
with purified recombinant proteins has not been reported.
:
Therefore, it is not surprising that there is predominant evidence against the involvement of
Cyt c in caspase activation both in vitro and in vivo in responding to a variety of stimuli (26).
However, strong evidence for the involvement of Cyt c came from the discovery that cyt-c-d
is necessary for effector caspase activation and spermatogenesis (4, 5). It was also found that
cyt-c-d regulates developmental apoptosis in the fly retina (94). However, as it was not shown
if the apoptotic phenotype in the eyes depends on Dronc or Dark, it may be possible that the
lack of caspase activation could be due to reduced ATP level or dysfunctional mitochondria
in cyt-c-d−/− flies. Later, it was found that the cyt-c-d mutants used in the above-mentioned
studies contain a P-element that also disrupts two other genes (56). Furthermore, Drice acti‐
vation during spermatogenesis appears to be Dark- and Dronc-independent (56), raising the
possibility that the defects shown in cyt-c-d mutants could be simply due to mitochondria
dysfunction-mediated cell death.
It is also puzzling that the only two Bcl-2 homologs in flies, Debcl/Drob-1/dBorg-1/dBok
and Buffy/dBorg-2, seem not to play any role in developmental cell death when analyzed in
either single or double knockout flies (115), which is in contrast to the data from RNAi and
overexpression studies (57, 107). However, debclw105 flies are as resistant to γ-irradiation as
arkCD4 (115), a mutant that almost fully lacks irradiation-induced apoptosis in the embryo
(110). In contrast, loss of Buffy resulted in a small increase in irradiation-induced apoptotic
cells. debcl buffy double mutants exhibit a phenotype similar to that of buffy single mutant
flies, suggesting that Buffy acts antiapoptotically and downstream of Debcl (115). Although
surprising, it suggests that both proteins are not essential for apoptosis induction and may
exert their functions by regulating or interfering with the core apoptosis machinery in the
flies. Recently, another report suggested that Debcl is not required for genotoxic stress-in‐
duced apoptosis and killing by RHG proteins, but is required for killing by Bax (37).
Although it is not clear whether Bcl-2 homolog proteins play any essential roles in fly apop‐
tosis, they do induce apoptosis in mammalian cells. dBok/Debcl induces apoptosis in human
cells, which can be suppressed by human Bcl-2 family proteins (157). Even though dBok/De‐
bcl targets to mitochondria and triggers Cyt c release in human cells, the BH3 domain is not
required for its apoptotic function, similar to human Bok. In addition, ecotopic expression of
Bcl-2 can suppress Reaper-induced apoptosis in Drosophila (14). Taken together, it seems
that Bcl-2 proteins, through association with mitochondria, have the potential to be involved
in apoptosis in flies, but flies somehow have evolved a pathway that bypasses the usage of
Bcl-2 proteins. It might be largely due to the fact that RHG proteins, the potent DIAP-1 an‐
tagonists, are transcriptionally regulated and do not need the control of Bcl-2 proteins on mi‐
tochondrial membrane permeability to regulate the release of IAP antagonists (such as Smac,
Omi) in mammals. Another possibility is that unlike in mammals, where XIAP simply binds
and inhibits the catalytic activity of caspase-9, fly DIAP-1 triggers Dronc degradation. By
promoting DIAP1 degradation, induction of RHG proteins will ensure no more interference
of DIAP1 on Dronc and Drice. These two caspases, just as procaspase-9, may have some
weak catalytic activity as procaspases, which may be enough to induce apoptosis. None‐
:
theless, mitochondria seem to play greater roles in fly apoptosis beyond those regulated by
Bcl-2 proteins. To support this, the mitochondrial fission protein Drp1 was found to partici‐
pate in fly apoptosis as drp-1 mutant hemocytes were protected from apoptosis induced by a
variety of stimuli such as etoposide, actinomycin D, and UV-B radiation (42), in addition to
exhibiting elongated mitochondria.
Perspective
Although the central role of mitochondria in apoptosis is well established in mammals, it re‐
mains largely unclear whether mitochondria are involved in apoptosis in other model systems
such as nematodes and flies. It also raises a question about when mitochondria evolved to be
central executioners of apoptosis. Given the functional conservation between worm Ced-9
and mammalian Bcl-2, why Drosophila Bcl-2 homologs seem not to play similar essential
roles in apoptosis induction is mysterious. One puzzle is that many core apoptotic proteins
are localized on the mitochondrial outer membrane such as Ced-9 in worms and RHG pro‐
teins in flies. Are mitochondria simply providing a membrane environment for protein-pro‐
tein interactions as in the case of Bax and tBid interaction in mammals? In addition, when
did vertebrates evolve extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways? Answers to these questions
will help us to better understand how Bcl-2 family members act on mitochondria. One hy‐
pothesis for a housekeeping function of Bcl-2 family members is to regulate mitochondrial
fusion and fission (23, 63).
It has been more than a decade since the central role of Cyt c in mitochondrial pathway has
been discovered. However, key issues regarding how Cyt c is released from mitochondria
remain largely unclear. In addition, models derived from biochemical data are often chal‐
lenged by genetic analyses. It is worth mentioning that, whereas overexpression studies and
in vitro biochemical work may inadvertently result in some artifacts, lack of apoptotic pheno‐
types in gene knockout mice or cell lines does not necessarily argue against a physiological
role of the target genes. This is because gene redundancy and compensatory mechanisms
could simply prevent the appearance of predicted phenotypes. In addition, alternative splic‐
ing variants could be responsible for lack of phenotype when only one splicing variant is in‐
advertently targeted for deletion. Therefore, careful characterization of knockout mice at the
molecular level is desired. For instance, antibodies raised with defined epitopes (from both
N-terminal and C-terminal regions of the target protein) will ensure that no truncated protein
products (which might be functional) are produced in the knockouts. Moreover, many killer
genes may also perform some central functions in normal mitochondrial or other cellular ac‐
tivities and simply knocking out these genes would cause severe cellular or developmental
defects that may mask their predicted apoptotic phenotypes.
Apoptosis is a rapid process. It will therefore be a challenge to study the dynamics of protein-
protein and protein-membrane interactions in dying cells in vivo as well as the structures of
membrane-bound proteins and captured conformational changes, which are the key to help‐
:
ing us understand the mechanisms of both apoptosis induction and execution. Determination
of the nature of oligomeric Bax/Bak pores and the mechanisms underlying Bax translocation
and activation are the two “holy grails” that remain to be understood. Answering these ques‐
tions may also ultimately facilitate our design of more potent and specific chemotherapeutic
drugs for cancers and other apoptosis-induced diseases. Finally, our knowledge of apoptosis
has been tremendously advanced by forward genetic studies in worms and flies and reverse
genetic studies in mice and in biochemical cell-free systems. Challenges will be to develop
similar cell-free systems to explore the roles of unknown membrane-bound proteins and to
design forward genetic screens in mammalian cell lines or mice to identify novel genes in‐
volved in apoptosis, which should fill important gaps in our understanding of cell death.
The extrinsic pathway, also known as the death-receptor pathway, is activated from
outside the cell by ligation of transmembrane death receptors such as Fas, TNF,
TRAIL, and DR3–6 receptors with their corresponding ligands. Upon activation,
each receptor can form a death-inducing signaling complex (DISC) by recruiting the
adaptor Fasassociated death domain (FADD) and apical procaspase-8 and −10. As a
consequence, caspase-8 and −10 are activated, which directly cleave and activate
effector caspase-3/7.
SUMMARY POINTS
FUTURE ISSUES
1. How did mitochondria and Bcl-2 family proteins evolve to regulate apoptosis and
how have the apoptosis pathways diverged in C. elegans, Drosophila, and
vertebrates? Are there missing links that prevent us from reaching a unifying
model for the role of mitochondria and Bcl-2 family proteins in animals?
2. What is the mechanism underlying Bax/Bak activation? Are BH3-only proteins
the activators? How do antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins inhibit Bax/Bak activation by
binding Bax/Bak, BH3-only proteins or both?
3. What is the nature of oligomeric Bax/Bak induced pores? How does the structure
of Bax in the membrane compare with that of Bax in solution?
4. Is there a Cyt c-independent apoptosis pathway in mammals and how important
might it be?
5. As genetic data so far do not correlate with biochemical data regarding their roles
in apoptosis, how important are other proteins released from mitochondria? Are
they released in the same way as Cyt c?
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute
of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. We apologize in advance to all the investigators whose
research could not be appropriately cited owing to space limitations.
:
Glossary
Mitochondria outer
responsible for release of Cyt c and other IMS proteins
membrane
and is believed to be induced by oligomeric Bax/Bak
permeability (MOMP)
STS staurosporine
PS Phosphatidylserine
:
Footnotes
*
The U.S. Government has the right to retain a nonexclusive royalty-free license in and to any copyright
covering this paper.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
The authors are not aware of any affiliations, memberships, funding, or financial holdings that might be
perceived as affecting the objectivity of this review.
LITERATURE CITED
1. Abdelwahid E, Yokokura T, Krieser RJ, Balasundaram S, Fowle WH, White K. Mitochondrial disruption in
Drosophila apoptosis. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:793–806. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2. Anflous K, Armstrong DD, Craigen WJ. Altered mitochondrial sensitivity for ADP and maintenance of creatine-
stimulated respiration in oxidative striated muscles from VDAC1-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:1954–
1960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3. Antonsson B, Montessuit S, Sanchez B, Martinou JC. Bax is present as a high molecular weight
oligomer/complex in the mitochondrial membrane of apoptotic cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:11615–11623.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4. Arama E, Agapite J, Steller H. Caspase activity and a specific cytochrome c are required for sperm differentiation
in Drosophila . Dev. Cell. 2003;4:687–697. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5. Arama E, Bader M, Srivastava M, Bergmann A, Steller H. The two Drosophila cytochrome c proteins can
function in both respiration and caspase activation. EMBO J. 2006;25:232–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
6. Arnoult D, Gaume B, Karbowski M, Sharpe JC, Cecconi F, Youle RJ. Mitochondrial release of AIF and EndoG
requires caspase activation downstream of Bax/Bak-mediated permeabilization. EMBO J. 2003;22:4385–4399.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Purcell NH, Blair NS, Osinska H, et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for
mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005;434:658–662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8. Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Sheiko T, Craigen WJ, Molkentin JD. Voltage-dependent anion channels are dispensable
for mitochondrial-dependent cell death. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:550–555. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
9. Bao Q, Riedl SJ, Shi Y. Structure of Apaf-1 in the auto-inhibited form: a critical role for ADP. Cell Cycle.
2005;4:1001–1003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
10. Bénit P, Goncalves S, Dassa EP, Briére JJ, Rustin P. The variability of the harlequin mouse phenotype resembles
that of human mitochondrial-complex I-deficiency syndromes. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e3208. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11. Bouillet P, Metcalf D, Huang DC, Tarlinton DM, Kay TW, et al. Proapoptotic Bcl-2 relative Bim required for
certain apoptotic responses, leukocyte homeostasis, and to preclude autoimmunity. Science. 1999;286:1735–1738.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12. Boujrad H, Gubkina O, Robert N, Krantic S, Susin SA. AIF-mediated programmed necrosis: a highly regulated
way to die. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:2612–2619. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13. Brown D, Yu BD, Joza N, Benit P, Meneses J, et al. Loss of Aif function causes cell death in the mouse embryo,
but the temporal progression of patterning is normal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:9918–9923. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14. Brun S, Rincheval V, Gaumer S, Mignotte B, Guenal I. Reaper and bax initiate two different apoptotic pathways
affecting mitochondria and antagonized by bcl-2 in Drosophila . Oncogene. 2002;21:6458–6470. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
15. Cecconi F, Alvarez-Bolado G, Meyer BI, Roth KA, Gruss P. Apaf1 (CED-4 homolog) regulates programmed
cell death in mammalian development. Cell. 1998;94:727–737. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16. Chai J, Yan N, Huh JR, Wu JW, Li W, et al. Molecular mechanism of Reaper-Grim-Hid-mediated suppression of
DIAP1-dependent Dronc ubiquitination. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2003;10:892–898. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17. Cheng EH, Sheiko TV, Fisher JK, Craigen WJ, Korsmeyer SJ. VDAC2 inhibits BAK activation and
mitochondrial apoptosis. Science. 2003;301:513–517. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18. Cheung EC, Joza N, Steenaart NA, McClellan KA, Neuspiel M, et al. Dissociating the dual roles of apoptosis-
inducing factor in maintaining mitochondrial structure and apoptosis. EMBO J. 2006;25:4061–4073. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19. Chipuk JE, Green DR. How do BCL-2 proteins induce mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization? Trends
Cell Biol. 2008;18:157–164. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21. Cory S, Adams JM. The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat. Rev. Cancer.
2002;2:647–656. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22. David KK, Sasaki M, Yu SW, Dawson TM, Dawson VL. EndoG is dispensable in embryogenesis and apoptosis.
Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1147–1155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Delivani P, Adrain C, Taylor RC, Duriez PJ, Martin SJ. Role for CED-9 and Egl-1 as regulators of mitochondrial
fission and fusion dynamics. Mol. Cell. 2006;21:761–773. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
24. Deng X, Yin X, Allan R, Lu DD, Maurer CW, et al. Ceramide biogenesis is required for radiationinduced
apoptosis in the germ line of C. elegans . Science. 2008;322:110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25. Deng Y, Ren X, Yang L, Lin Y, Wu X. A JNK-dependent pathway is required for TNFalpha-induced apoptosis.
Cell. 2003;115:61–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26. Dorstyn L, Mills K, Lazebnik Y, Kumar S. The two cytochrome c species, DC3 and DC4, are not required for
caspase activation and apoptosis in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Biol. 2004;167:405–410. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
27. Du C, Fang M, Li Y, Li L, Wang X. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent
caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell. 2000;102:33–42. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28. Duckett CS. IAP proteins: sticking it to Smac. Biochem. J. 2005;385:e1–e2. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
29. Eckelman BP, Salvesen GS, Scott FL. Human inhibitor of apoptosis proteins: why XIAP is the black sheep of
the family. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:988–994. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30. Ekert PG, Vaux DL. The mitochondrial death squad: hardened killers or innocent bystanders? Curr. Opin. Cell
Biol. 2005;17:626–630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31. Eskes R, Desagher S, Antonsson B, Martinou JC. Bid induces the oligomerization and insertion of Bax into the
outer mitochondrial membrane. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000;20:929–935. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Faccio L, Fusco C, Chen A, Martinotti S, Bonventre JV, Zervos AS. Characterization of a novel human serine
protease that has extensive homology to bacterial heat shock endoprotease HtrA and is regulated by kidney
ischemia. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:2581–2588. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33. Frank S, Gaume B, Bergmann-Leitner ES, Leitner WW, Robert EG, et al. The role of dynamin-related protein 1,
a mediator of mitochondrial fission, in apoptosis. Dev. Cell. 2001;1:515–525. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34. Freel CD, Richardson DA, Thomenius MJ, Gan EC, Horn SR, et al. Mitochondrial localization of Reaper to
promote inhibitors of apoptosis protein degradation conferred by GH3 domain-lipid interactions. J. Biol. Chem.
2008;283:367–379. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Frezza C, Cipolat S, Martins de Brito O, Micaroni M, Beznoussenko GV, et al. OPA1 controls apoptotic cristae
remodeling independently from mitochondrial fusion. Cell. 2006;126:177–189. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Fu J, Jin Y, Arend LJ. Smac3, a novel Smac/DIABLO splicing variant, attenuates the stability and apoptosis-
inhibiting activity of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:52660–52672. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
37. Galindo KA, Lu WJ, Park JH, Abrams JM. The Bax/Bak ortholog in Drosophila, Debcl, exerts limited control
over programmed cell death. Development. 2009;136:275–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38. Galluzzi L, Kroemer G. Mitochondrial apoptosis without VDAC. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:487–489. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
:
39. Geng X, Shi Y, Nakagawa A, Yoshina S, Mitani S, Xue D. Inhibition of CED-3 zymogen activation and
apoptosis in Caenorhabditis elegans by caspase homolog CSP-3. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008;15:1094–1101. [PMC
free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Germain M, Mathai JP, McBride HM, Shore GC. Endoplasmic reticulum BIK initiates DRP1-regulated
remodelling of mitochondrial cristae during apoptosis. EMBO J. 2005;24:1546–1556. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
41. Gonzalvez F, Schug ZT, Houtkooper RH, MacKenzie ED, Brooks DG, et al. Cardiolipin provides an essential
activating platform for caspase-8 on mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 2008;183:681–696. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
42. Goyal G, Fell B, Sarin A, Youle RJ, Sriram V. Role of mitochondrial remodeling in programmed cell death in
Drosophila melanogaster . Dev. Cell. 2007;12:807–816. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43. Goyal L, McCall K, Agapite J, Hartwieg E, Steller H. Induction of apoptosis by Drosophila reaper, hid and grim
through inhibition of IAP function. EMBO J. 2000;19:589–597. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44. Graham BH, Waymire KG, Cottrell B, Trounce IA, MacGregor GR, Wallace DC. A mouse model for
mitochondrial myopathy and cardiomyopathy resulting from a deficiency in the heart/muscle isoform of the adenine
nucleotide translocator. Nat. Genet. 1997;16:226–234. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45. Griffiths GJ, Dubrez L, Morgan CP, Jones NA, Whitehouse J, et al. Cell damage-induced conformational
changes of the proapoptotic protein Bak in vivo precede the onset of apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 1999;144:903–914.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46. Haining WN, Carboy-Newcomb C, Wei CL, Steller H. The proapoptotic function of Drosophila Hid is
conserved in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:4936–4941. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
47. Hakem R, Hakem A, Duncan GS, Henderson JT, Woo M, et al. Differential requirement for caspase 9 in
apoptotic pathways in vivo. Cell. 1998;94:339–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48. Hansen TM, Smith DJ, Nagley P. Smac/DIABLO is not released from mitochondria during apoptotic signaling
in cells deficient in cytochrome c. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1181–1190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49. Hao Z, Duncan GS, Chang CC, Elia A, Fang M, et al. Specific ablation of the apoptotic functions of cytochrome
c reveals a differential requirement for cytochrome c and Apaf-1 in apoptosis. Cell. 2005;121:579–591. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar] Report on a Cyt c knockin mouse model demonstrating the physiological role of Cyt c in apoptosis
50. Hasenjäger A, Gillissen B, Müller A, Normand G, Hemmati PG, et al. Smac induces cytochrome c release and
apoptosis independently from Bax/Bcl-x(L) in a strictly caspase-3-dependent manner in human carcinoma cells.
Oncogene. 2004;23:4523–4535. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51. Hegde R, Srinivasula SM, Zhang Z, Wassell R, Mukattash R, et al. Identification of Omi/HtrA2 as a
mitochondrial apoptotic serine protease that disrupts inhibitor of apoptosis protein-caspase interaction. J. Biol.
Chem. 2002;277:432–438. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
52. Hockenbery D, Nunez G, Milliman C, Schreiber R, Korsmeyer SJ. Bcl-2 is an inner mitochondrial membrane
protein that blocks programmed cell death. Nature. 1990;348:334–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53. Hockenbery DM, Oltvai ZN, Yin XM, Milliman CL, Korsmeyer SJ. Bcl-2 functions in an antioxidant pathway to
prevent apoptosis. Cell. 1993;75:241–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54. Hsu YT, Wolter KG, Youle RJ. Cytosol-to-membrane redistribution of Bax and Bcl-X(L) during apoptosis.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:3668–3672. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] First report
indicating Bax translocates to mitochondria during apoptosis
55. Hu Y, Ding L, Spencer DM, Nunez G. WD-40 repeat region regulates Apaf-1 self-association and procaspase-9
activation. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:33489–33494. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56. Huh JR, Vernooy SY, Yu H, Yan N, Shi Y, et al. Multiple apoptotic caspase cascades are required in
nonapoptotic roles for Drosophila spermatid individualization. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:E15. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57. Igaki T, Kanuka H, Inohara N, Sawamoto K, Núñez G, et al. Drob-1, a Drosophila member of the Bcl-2/CED-9
family that promotes cell death. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:662–667. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
58. Irvine RA, Adachi N, Shibata DK, Cassell GD, Yu K, et al. Generation and characterization of endonuclease G
null mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:294–302. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59. Jacobson MD, Burne JF, Raff MC. Programmed cell death and Bcl-2 protection in the absence of a nucleus.
EMBO J. 1994;13:1899–1910. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60. Jones JM, Datta P, Srinivasula SM, Ji W, Gupta S, et al. Loss of Omi mitochondrial protease activity causes the
neuromuscular disorder of mnd2 mutant mice. Nature. 2003;425:721–727. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61. Joza N, Oudit GY, Brown D, Bénit P, Kassiri Z, et al. Muscle-specific loss of apoptosis-inducing factor leads to
mitochondrial dysfunction, skeletal muscle atrophy, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005;25:10261–
10272. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62. Joza N, Susin SA, Daugas E, Stanford WL, Cho SK, et al. Essential role of the mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing
factor in programmed cell death. Nature. 2001;410:549–554. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63. Karbowski M, Norris KL, Cleland MM, Jeong SY, Youle RJ. Role of Bax and Bak in mitochondrial
morphogenesis. Nature. 2006;443:658–662. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64. Kerr J, Wyllie A, Currie A. Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in tissue
kinetics. Br. J. Cancer. 1972;26:239–257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] The seminal paper for the
term apoptosis.
65. Kim H, Rafiuddin-Shah M, Tu HC, Jeffers JR, Zambetti GP, et al. Hierarchical regulation of mitochondrion-
dependent apoptosis by BCL-2 subfamilies. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:1348–1358. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
66. Kim HE, Du F, Fang M, Wang X. Formation of apoptosome is initiated by cytochrome c-induced dATP
hydrolysis and subsequent nucleotide exchange on Apaf-1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:17545–17550.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67. Kinnally KW, Antonsson B. A tale of two mitochondrial channels, MAC and PTP, in apoptosis. Apoptosis.
2007;12:857–868. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68. Klein JA, Longo-Guess CM, Rossmann MP, Seburn KL, Hurd RE, et al. The harlequin mouse mutation
downregulates apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature. 2002;419:367–374. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69. Kluck RM, Bossy-Wetzel E, Green DR, Newmeyer DD. The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria: a
primary site for Bcl-2 regulation of apoptosis. Science. 1997;275:1132–1136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Back-to-
back papers demonstrating that the primary antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 is to block Cyt c release
70. Kohli M, Yu J, Seaman C, Bardelli A, Kinzler KW, et al. SMAC/Diablo-dependent apoptosis induced by
nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in colon cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:16897–
16902. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71. Kokoszka JE, Waymire KG, Levy SE, Sligh JE, Cai J, et al. The ADP/ATP translocator is not essential for the
mitochondrial permeability transition pore. Nature. 2004;427:461–465. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
72. Krauskopf A, Eriksson O, Craigen WJ, Forte MA, Bernardi P. Properties of the permeability transition in
VDAC1(−/−) mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2006;1757:590–595. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73. Kroemer G, Galluzzi L, Brenner C. Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death. Physiol. Rev.
2007;87:99–163. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
74. Kroemer G, Petit P, Zamzami N, Vayssie`re JL, Mignotte B. The biochemistry of programmed cell death.
FASEB J. 1995;9:1277–1287. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75. Kuida K, Haydar TF, Kuan CY, Gu Y, Taya C, et al. Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase
activation in mice lacking caspase 9. Cell. 1998;94:325–337. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76. Kuwana T, Mackey MR, Perkins G, Ellisman MH, Latterich M, et al. Bid, Bax, and lipids cooperate to form
supramolecular openings in the outer mitochondrial membrane. Cell. 2002;111:331–342. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
77. Lakhani S, Masud A, Kuida K, Porter GA, Jr, Booth C, et al. Caspases 3 and 7: key mediators of mitochondrial
events of apoptosis. Science. 2006;311:847–851. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78. Leber B, Lin J, Andrews DW. Embedded together: the life and death consequences of interaction of the Bcl-2
family with membranes. Apoptosis. 2007;12:897–911. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79. Lee YJ, Jeong SY, Karbowski M, Smith CL, Youle RJ. Roles of the mammalian mitochondrial fission and fusion
mediators Fis1, Drp1, and Opa1 in apoptosis. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2004;15:5001–5011. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
:
80. Lettre G, Hengartner MO. Developmental apoptosis in C. elegans: a complex CEDnario. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 2006;7:97–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81. Li H, Zhu H, Xu CJ, Yuan J. Cleavage of BID by caspase 8 mediates the mitochondrial damage in the Fas
pathway of apoptosis. Cell. 1998;94:491–501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Back-to-back papers discovering the
crosstalk between extrinsic pathway and intrinsic pathway
82. Li K, Li Y, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Spencer E, et al. Cytochrome c deficiency causes embryonic lethality
and attenuates stress-induced apoptosis. Cell. 2000;101:389–399. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83. Li LY, Luo X, Wang X. Endonuclease G is an apoptotic DNase when released from mitochondria. Nature.
2001;412:95–99. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84. Li P, Nijhawan D, Budihardjo I, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, et al. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation
of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade. Cell. 1997;91:479–489. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
85. Lindsten T, Ross AJ, King A, Zong WX, Rathmell JC, et al. The combined functions of proapoptotic Bcl-2
family members bak and bax are essential for normal development of multiple tissues. Mol. Cell. 2000;6:1389–
1399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Liu X, Kim CN, Yang J, Jemmerson R, Wang X. Induction of apoptotic program in cell-free extracts:
requirement for dATP and cytochrome c. Cell. 1996;86:147–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] First paper to
demonstrate the role of Cyt c in caspase activation
87. Lovell JF, Billen LP, Bindner S, Shamas-Din A, Fradin C, et al. Membrane binding by tBid initiates an ordered
series of events culminating in membrane permeabilization by Bax. Cell. 2008;135:1074–1084. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
88. Low RL. Mitochondrial endonuclease G function in apoptosis and mtDNA metabolism: a historical perspective.
Mitochondrion. 2003;2:225–236. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89. Luo X, Budihardjo I, Zou H, Slaughter C, Wang X. Bid, a Bcl2 interacting protein, mediates cytochrome c
release from mitochondria in response to activation of cell surface death receptors. Cell. 1998;94:481–490.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar] Back-to-back papers discovering the crosstalk between extrinsic pathway and intrinsic
pathway
90. Lutter M, Fang M, Luo X, Nishijima M, Xie X, Wang X. Cardiolipin provides specificity for targeting of tBid to
mitochondria. Nat. Cell Biol. 2000;2:754–761. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91. Marsden VS, O’Connor L, O’Reilly LA, Silke J, Metcalf D, et al. Apoptosis initiated by Bcl-2-regulated caspase
activation independently of the cytochrome c/Apaf-1/caspase-9 apoptosome. Nature. 2002;419:634–637. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
92. Martins LM, Iaccarino I, Tenev T, Gschmeissner S, Totty NF, et al. The serine protease Omi/HtrA2 regulates
apoptosis by binding XIAP through a reaper-like motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:439–444. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
:
93. Martins LM, Morrison A, Klupsch K, Fedele V, Moisoi N, et al. Neuroprotective role of the Reaper-related
serine protease HtrA2/Omi revealed by targeted deletion in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2004;24:9848–9862. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94. Mendes CS, Arama E, Brown S, Scherr H, Srivastava M, et al. Cytochrome c-d regulates developmental
apoptosis in the Drosophila retina. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:933–939. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95. Morizane Y, Honda R, Fukami K, Yasuda H. X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis functions as ubiquitin ligase toward
mature caspase-9 and cytosolic Smac/DIABLO. J. Biochem. 2005;137:125–132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96. Muchmore SW, Sattler M, Liang H, Meadows RP, Harlan JE, et al. X-ray and NMR structure of human Bcl-xL,
an inhibitor of programmed cell death. Nature. 1996;381:335–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97. Muro I, Monser K, Clem RJ. Mechanism of Dronc activation in Drosophila cells. J. Cell Sci. 2004;117:5035–
5041. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98. Nakagawa T, Shimizu S, Watanabe T, Yamaguchi O, Otsu K, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial
permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434:652–658. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
99. Newmeyer DD, Farschon DM, Reed JC. Cell-free apoptosis in Xenopus egg extracts: inhibition by Bcl-2 and
requirement for an organelle fraction enriched in mitochondria. Cell. 1994;79:353–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
First report on the requirement of mitochondria for apoptosis using cell-free system
100. Okada H, Suh W, Jin J, Woo M, Du C, et al. Generation and characterization of Smac/DIABLO-deficient mice.
Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002;22:3509–3517. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101. Olson MR, Holley CL, Gan EC, Colon-Ramos DA, Kaplan B, Kornbluth S. A GH3-like domain in reaper is
required for mitochondrial localization and induction of IAP degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:44758–44768.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102. Ow YL, Green DR, Hao Z, Mak TW. Cytochrome c: functions beyond respiration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.
2008;9:532–542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103. Pardo OE, Lesay A, Arcaro A, Lopes R, Ng BL, et al. Fibroblast growth factor 2-mediated translational control
of IAPs blocks mitochondrial release of Smac/DIABLO and apoptosis in small cell lung cancer cells. Mol. Cell.
Biol. 2003;23:7600–7610. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104. Parone PA, James DI, Da Cruz S, Mattenberger Y, Donze O, et al. Inhibiting the mitochondrial fission
machinery does not prevent Bax/Bak-dependent apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006;26:7397–7408. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105. Parrish J, Li L, Klotz K, Ledwich D, Wang X, Xue D. Mitochondrial endonuclease G is important for apoptosis
in C. elegans . Nature. 2001;412:90–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106. Pospisilik JA, Knauf C, Joza N, Benit P, Orthofer M, et al. Targeted deletion of AIF decreases mitochondrial
oxidative phosphorylation and protects from obesity and diabetes. Cell. 2007;131:476–491. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
:
107. Quinn L, Coombe M, Mills K, Daish T, Colussi P, et al. Buffy, a Drosophila Bcl-2 protein, has antiapoptotic
and cell cycle inhibitory functions. EMBO J. 2003;22:3568–3579. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108. Rehm M, Düssmann H, Prehn JH. Real-time single cell analysis of Smac/DIABLO release during apoptosis. J.
Cell Biol. 2003;162:1031–1043. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109. Roberts DL, Merrison W, MacFarlane M, Cohen GM. The inhibitor of apoptosis protein-binding domain of
Smac is not essential for its proapoptotic activity. J. Cell Biol. 2001;153:221–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
110. Rodriguez A, Chen P, Oliver H, Abrams JM. Unrestrained caspase-dependent cell death caused by loss of
Diap1 function requires the Drosophila Apaf-1 homolog, Dark. EMBO J. 2002;21:2189–2197. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111. Rodriguez A, Oliver H, Zou H, Chen P, Wang X, Abrams JM. Dark is a Drosophila homologue of Apaf-
1/CED-4 and functions in an evolutionarily conserved death pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999;1:272–279. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
112. Salvesen GS, Dixit VM. Caspases: intracellular signaling by proteolysis. Cell. 1997;91:443–446. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
113. Schäfer P, Scholz SR, Gimadutdinow O, Cymerman IA, Bujnicki JM, et al. Structural and functional
characterization of mitochondrial EndoG, a sugar nonspecific nuclease which plays an important role during
apoptosis. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;338:217–228. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114. Scorrano L, Ashiya M, Buttle K, Weiler S, Oakes SA, et al. A distinct pathway remodels mitochondrial cristae
and mobilizes cytochrome c during apoptosis. Dev. Cell. 2002;2:55–67. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115. Sevrioukov EA, Burr J, Huang EW, Assi HH, Monserrate JP, et al. Drosophila Bcl-2 proteins participate in
stress-induced apoptosis, but are not required for normal development. Genesis. 2007;45:184–193. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
116. Shi Y. Apoptosome assembly. Methods Enzymol. 2008;442:141–156. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117. Silke J, Ekert PG, Day CL, Hawkins CJ, Baca M, et al. Direct inhibition of caspase 3 is dispensable for the
antiapoptotic activity of XIAP. EMBO J. 2001;20:3114–3123. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119. Srinivasula SM, Datta P, Fan XJ, Fernandes-Alnemri T, Huang Z, Alnemri ES. Molecular determinants of the
caspase-promoting activity of Smac/DIABLO and its role in the death receptor pathway. J. Biol. Chem.
2000;275:36152–36157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120. Srinivasula SM, Hegde R, Saleh A, Datta P, Shiozaki E, et al. A conserved XIAP-interaction motif in caspase-9
and Smac/DIABLO regulates caspase activity and apoptosis. Nature. 2001;410:112–116. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
121. Suen DF, Norris KL, Youle RJ. Mitochondrial dynamics and apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2008;22:1577–1590.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
122. Sun MG, Williams J, Munoz-Pinedo C, Perkins GA, Brown JM, et al. Correlated three-dimensional light and
electron microscopy reveals transformation of mitochondria during apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007;9:1057–1065.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123. Susin SA, Lorenzo HK, Zamzami N, Marzo I, Snow BE, et al. Molecular characterization of mitochondrial
apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature. 1999;397:441–446. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124. Susin SA, Zamzami N, Castedo M, Hirsch T, Marchetti P, et al. Bcl-2 inhibits the mitochondrial release of an
apoptogenic protease. J. Exp. Med. 1996;184:1331–1341. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125. Suzuki Y, Imai Y, Nakayama H, Takahashi K, Takio K, Takahashi R. A serine protease, HtrA2, is released
from the mitochondria and interacts with XIAP, inducing cell death. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:613–621. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
126. Tan FJ, Fire AZ, Hill RB. Regulation of apoptosis by C. elegans CED-9 in the absence of the C-terminal
transmembrane domain. Cell Death Differ. 2007;14:1925–1935. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127. Tenev T, Zachariou A, Wilson R, Paul A, Meier P. Jafrac2 is an IAP antagonist that promotes cell death by
liberating Dronc from DIAP1. EMBO J. 2002;21:5118–5129. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128. Urbano A, Lakshmanan U, Choo PH, Kwan JC, Ng PY, et al. AIF suppresses chemical stress-induced apoptosis
and maintains the transformed state of tumor cells. EMBO J. 2005;24:2815–2826. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
130. van Loo G, van Gurp M, Depuydt B, Srinivasula SM, Rodriguez I, et al. The serine protease Omi/HtrA2 is
released from mitochondria during apoptosis. Omi interacts with caspase-inhibitor XIAP and induces enhanced
caspase activity. Cell Death Differ. 2002;9:20–26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131. Vande Walle L, Lamkanfi M, Vandenabeele P. The mitochondrial serine protease HtrA2/Omi: an overview.
Cell Death Differ. 2008;15:453–460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132. Verhagen AM, Ekert PG, Pakusch M, Silke J, Connolly LM, et al. Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian
protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell. 2000;102:43–53. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
133. Wang X, Wang J, Gengyo-Ando K, Gu L, Sun CL, et al. C. elegans mitochondrial factor WAH-1 promotes
phosphatidylserine externalization in apoptotic cells through phospholipid scramblase SCRM-1. Nat. Cell Biol.
2007;9:541–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134. Wang X, Yang C, Chai J, Shi Y, Xue D. Mechanisms of AIF-mediated apoptotic DNA degradation in
Caenorhabditis elegans . Science. 2002;298:1587–1592. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135. Wei MC, Zong WX, Cheng EH, Lindsten T, Panoutsakopoulou V, et al. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: a
requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Science. 2001;292:727–730. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
:
136. White K, Grether M, Abrams J, Young L, Steller H. Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila .
Science. 1994;264:1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] First genetic screen to identify genes essential for fly apoptosis
137. Widlak P, Li LY, Wang X, Garrard WT. Action of recombinant human apoptotic endonuclease G on naked
DNA and chromatin substrates: cooperation with exonuclease and DNase I. J. Biol. Chem. 2001;276:48404–48409.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138. Willis SN, Fletcher JI, Kaufmann T, van Delft MF, Chen L, et al. Apoptosis initiated when BH3 ligands engage
multiple Bcl-2 homologs, not Bax or Bak. Science. 2007;315:856–859. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139. Wilson R, Goyal L, Ditzel M, Zachariou A, Baker DA, et al. The DIAP1 RING finger mediates ubiquitination
of Dronc and is indispensable for regulating apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:445–450. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140. Wolter KG, Hsu YT, Smith CL, Nechushtan A, Xi XG, Youle RJ. Movement of Bax from the cytosol to
mitochondria during apoptosis. J. Cell Biol. 1997;139:1281–1292. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141. Wu S, Sampson MJ, Decker WK, Craigen WJ. Each mammalian mitochondrial outer membrane porin protein
is dispensable: effects on cellular respiration. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1999;1452:68–78. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
142. Yamaguchi R, Lartigue L, Perkins G, Scott RT, Dixit A, et al. Opa1-mediated cristae opening is Bax/Bak and
BH3 dependent, required for apoptosis, and independent of Bak oligomerization. Mol. Cell. 2008;31:557–569.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143. Yamaguchi R, Perkins G. Dynamics of mitochondrial structure during apoptosis and the enigma of Opa1.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1787:963–972. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144. Yan N, Chai J, Lee ES, Gu L, Liu Q, et al. Structure of the CED-4-CED-9 complex provides insights into
programmed cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans . Nature. 2005;437:831–837. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145. Yan N, Xu Y, Shi Y. 2:1 Stoichiometry of the CED-4-CED-9 complex and the tetrameric CED-4: insights into
the regulation of CED-3 activation. Cell Cycle. 2006;5:31–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146. Yang J, Liu X, Bhalla K, Kim CN, Ibrado AM, et al. Prevention of apoptosis by Bcl-2: release of cytochrome c
from mitochondria blocked. Science. 1997;275:1129–1132. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Back-to-back papers
demonstrating that the primary antiapoptotic function of Bcl-2 is to block Cyt c release
147. Yang QH, Church-Hajduk R, Ren J, Newton ML, Du C. Omi/HtrA2 catalytic cleavage of inhibitor of apoptosis
(IAP) irreversibly inactivates IAPs and facilitates caspase activity in apoptosis. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1487–1496.
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148. Ye H, Cande C, Stephanou NC, Jiang S, Gurbuxani S, et al. DNA binding is required for the apoptogenic action
of apoptosis inducing factor. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002;9:680–684. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149. Yoo SJ, Huh JR, Muro I, Yu H, Wang L, et al. Hid, Rpr and Grim negatively regulate DIAP1 levels through
distinct mechanisms. Nat. Cell Biol. 2002;4:416–424. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150. Yoshida H, Kong YY, Yoshida R, Elia AJ, Hakem A, et al. Apaf1 is required for mitochondrial pathways of
apoptosis and brain development. Cell. 1998;94:739–750. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
:
151. Youle RJ, Karbowski M. Mitochondrial fission in apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005;6:657–663.
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152. Youle RJ, Strasser A. The BCL-2 protein family: opposing activities that mediate cell death. Nat. Rev. Mol.
Cell Biol. 2008;9:47–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153. Yu X, Wang L, Acehan D, Wang X, Akey CW. Three-dimensional structure of a double apoptosome formed by
the Drosophila Apaf-1 related killer. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;355:577–589. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154. Yuan J, Shaham S, Ledoux S, Ellis HM, Horvitz HR. The C. elegans cell death gene ced-3 encodes a protein
similar to mammalian interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme. Cell. 1993;75:641–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155. Yuste VJ, Moubarak RS, Delettre C, Bras M, Sancho P, et al. Cysteine protease inhibition prevents
mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) release. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1445–1448. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
156. Zamzami N, Susin SA, Marchetti P, Hirsch T, Gómez-Monterrey I, et al. Mitochondrial control of nuclear
apoptosis. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:1533–1544. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
157. Zhang H, Huang Q, Ke N, Matsuyama S, Hammock B, et al. Drosophila proapoptotic Bcl-2/Bax homologue
reveals evolutionary conservation of cell death mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:27303–27306. [PubMed]
[Google Scholar]
158. Zhang J, Dong M, Li L, Fan Y, Pathre P, et al. Endonuclease G is required for early embryogenesis and normal
apoptosis in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:15782–15787. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
159. Zhou LL, Zhou LY, Luo KQ, Chang DC. Smac/DIABLO and cytochrome c are released from mitochondria
through a similar mechanism during UV-induced apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2005;10:289–299. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
160. Zong WX, Lindsten T, Ross AJ, MacGregor GR, Thompson CB. BH3-only proteins that bind prosurvival Bcl-2
family members fail to induce apoptosis in the absence of Bax and Bak. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1481–1486. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Establishes that BH3-only proteins and Bcl-2 proteins act through Bax /Bak
dependent pathway
: