Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

New Microsoft Excel Worksheet

The document reports the results of hypothesis tests conducted on mileage and top speed data from 20 cars of models Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32. For Rocinante 36, there was no significant difference found for both mileage (p=0.08) and top speed (p=0.43) compared to claimed specifications. For Marengo 32, no significant difference was found for mileage (p=0.13) but a slight difference was found for top speed (p=0.37), although above the 0.05 significance level. This implies that the cars generally meet the claimed specifications.

Uploaded by

evenkat35
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
14 views

New Microsoft Excel Worksheet

The document reports the results of hypothesis tests conducted on mileage and top speed data from 20 cars of models Rocinante 36 and Marengo 32. For Rocinante 36, there was no significant difference found for both mileage (p=0.08) and top speed (p=0.43) compared to claimed specifications. For Marengo 32, no significant difference was found for mileage (p=0.13) but a slight difference was found for top speed (p=0.37), although above the 0.05 significance level. This implies that the cars generally meet the claimed specifications.

Uploaded by

evenkat35
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Rocinante36:

Car No. Mileage (km/ltr) Top Speed (km/hr)


1 21.2 151.9
2 21.79 147.6
3 21.87 145.6
4 22.71 136.1
5 22.52 139.7
6 21.41 146.1
7 22.71 139.6
8 21.71 143
9 19.95 136.4
10 20.65 146.6
11 22.86 139.9
12 21.12 136.6
13 22.8 148.5
14 20.89 143.4
15 22.49 134.2
16 20.94 140.5
17 20.37 137.8
18 22.72 135.1
19 20.54 138.8
20 21.14 132

Marengo32:

Car No. Mileage (km/ltr) Top Speed (km/hr)


1 15.04 211.3
2 15.41 207
3 15.43 206.2
4 15.92 213.4
5 15.2 204.2
6 15.22 208.7
7 14.6 200
8 14.41 210.9
9 14.79 208.5
10 14.81 214.2
11 15.61 215.8
12 15.76 215.8
13 14.97 215.2
14 14.71 218.7
15 15.55 208
16 15.19 212.2
17 15.36 219.7
18 15.93 216.4
19 14.54 205.8
20 14.76 209

Rocinante 36:

Mileage Hypothesis Test


Sample Size 20
Sample Standard Deviation 0.93
Hypothesized Mean 22
Sample Mean 21.62
Std Error of Mean 0.21
Degrees of Freedom 19
t-Test Statistic -1.84
p-Value 0.08
Top Speed Hypothesis Test
Sample Size 20
Sample Standard Deviation 5.4
Hypothesized Mean 140
Sample Mean 140.97
Std Error of Mean 1.21
Degrees of Freedom 19
t-Test Statistic 0.8
p-Value 0.43

Marengo 32:

Mileage Hypothesis Test


Sample Size 20
Sample Standard Deviation 0.46
Hypothesized Mean 15
Sample Mean 15.16
Std Error of Mean 0.1
Degrees of Freedom 19
t-Test Statistic 1.56
p-Value 0.13
Top Speed Hypothesis Test
Sample Size 20
Sample Standard Deviation 5.15
Hypothesized Mean 210
Sample Mean 211.05
Std Error of Mean 1.15
Degrees of Freedom 19
t-Test Statistic 0.91
p-Value 0.37

For Rocinante 36, there is no significant difference in mileage and top speed compared to the claimed values.
For Marengo 32, there is no significant difference in mileage, but there is a slight difference in top speed (p-value > 0.05).

This implies that the cars are generally meeting the claimed specifications.
Hypothesis Testing Setup:

Rocinante 36:

Mileage
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 22 km/litre
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 22 km/litre
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
Top Speed
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 140 km/hr
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 140 km/hr
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093

Marengo 32:

Mileage
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 15 km/litre
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 15 km/litre
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
Top Speed
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 210 km/hr
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 210 km/hr
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
med values.
p speed (p-value > 0.05).

You might also like