New Microsoft Excel Worksheet
New Microsoft Excel Worksheet
Marengo32:
Rocinante 36:
Marengo 32:
For Rocinante 36, there is no significant difference in mileage and top speed compared to the claimed values.
For Marengo 32, there is no significant difference in mileage, but there is a slight difference in top speed (p-value > 0.05).
This implies that the cars are generally meeting the claimed specifications.
Hypothesis Testing Setup:
Rocinante 36:
Mileage
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 22 km/litre
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 22 km/litre
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
Top Speed
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 140 km/hr
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 140 km/hr
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
Marengo 32:
Mileage
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 15 km/litre
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 15 km/litre
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
Top Speed
Variables Data
Null Hypothesis (H0) µ = 210 km/hr
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) µ ≠ 210 km/hr
Level of Significance 5%
Critical Value ±2.093 (assuming a two-tailed test)
Decision Rule Reject H0 if t < -2.093 or t > 2.093
med values.
p speed (p-value > 0.05).