Preliminary Survey of Arcellaceans (Thecamoebians) As Limnological Indicators in Tropical Lake Sentani, Irian Jaya, Indonesia
Preliminary Survey of Arcellaceans (Thecamoebians) As Limnological Indicators in Tropical Lake Sentani, Irian Jaya, Indonesia
135
136 DALBY, KUMAR, MOORE, AND PATTERSON
FIGURE 1. Lake Sentani Map showing sample localities. Numerical localities represent samples collected during 1994 and 1995, and alphabetical
localities from 1997.
and May of 1995. Water depth, surface water temperature, Before shipment to Canada for processing, a 30% methyl
water temperature at depth, and a relative measure of oxy- alcohol solution was added to each sample to inhibit decay
gen concentration at depth were recorded for each sample of organic material. Rose Bengal (acid red 94) protoplasmic
locality. Oxygen and temperature measurements were re- stain was then added to indicate whether the specimens were
stricted to 15 m or less by limitations of the equipment. In alive at the time of collection. After standing for several
August of 1997, pH and salinity readings were recorded hours, the samples were screened with a 1000 m sieve to
from ten additional localities (Table 1; Fig. 1). remove coarse particles, and a 43 m screen to retain ar-
The geographical location of each sample site was deter- cellaceans, and to remove silts and clays. Finally, all sam-
mined using a Magellan Global Positioning System receiver. ples were treated with isopropyl alcohol and refrigerated.
A commercial sonar device (fish finder) was used to deter- The samples had an average volume of 18 cm3 and were
mine the depth of each sample station. In 1997, lake bottom
entirely processed.
water samples were obtained using a WildCo 1510TT water
The samples were then subdivided into aliquots for anal-
sampler. Measurements of pH of water samples were cali-
ysis using a wet splitter (Scott and Hermelin, 1993). Al-
brated against a pH 7.01 buffer standard. Salinity was mea-
sured with an automatic temperature compensating salinity though the low numbers of specimens found in this study
refractometer calibrated with distilled water, and was below did not really warrant splitting, low abundances could not
the detection limit in all samples. be determined prior to counting, which was subsequently
Samples with significant populations of arcellaceans were done using a binocular microscope.
found at muddy bottom sites with a large admixture of fine Electronically stored scanning electron micrographs were
organic material. Sites characterized by winnowed sandy obtained using a JEOL 6400 scanning electron microscope
substrates generally yielded small allochthonous arcellacean at the Carleton University Research Facility for Electron
assemblages. Some attempted sample stations were found Microscopy (CURFEM). The plate was electronically pro-
to be floored by exposed rock, providing no samples for duced on an Apple Macintosh computer using Adobe Pho-
analysis. toshop and output to a Linatronic printer.
ARCELLACEANS FROM LAKE SENTANI INDONESIA 137
TABLE 1. A. Sample locations, physical characteristics of Lake Sentani, specimen counts and their percentages. Field data collected in September
of 1994 and May of 1995 by J.M. Moore. B. Sample locations and pH measurements of water samples. Salinity was below detection limit in all
samples and thus was not presented on this table. Field data collected in August of 1997 by J.M. Moore.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION and strains were very low as well, rendering more substan-
The arcellacean fauna of Lake Sentani is quite impover- tive multivariate cluster analyses unfeasable. Therefore,
ished in terms of species numbers and Shannon Diversity only a qualitative assessment of the data was carried out.
Index scores (Table 1). Total counts of individual species All samples were dominated by two species, Arcella vul-
138 DALBY, KUMAR, MOORE, AND PATTERSON
PLATE 1
Scanning electron micrographs of Lake Sentani arcellaceans. 1 a–e Incerta sp. A. Agglutinated sphere of unknown affinity. 2 a–b Centropyxis
constricta ‘‘aerophila’’. Aperture forms an angle with the fundus. 3 Difflugia protaeiformis ‘‘claviformis’’. Test made from coarse grains and is
ARCELLACEANS FROM LAKE SENTANI INDONESIA 139
garis Ehrenberg 1830 and Centropyxis aculeata Ehrenberg this lake though, and the periodic fish-killing algal blooms
1832. In a few samples various difflugids and a possible suggest that some eutrophication, at least in surface waters,
new species of arcellacean, identified as Incerta sp. A, also could be occurring. However, eutrophication is not indicated
occur in appreciable numbers. by the benthic arcellacean fauna because Difflugia oblonga,
To evaluate the limnological significance of this arcella- one of the major indicator taxa of high organic content (Col-
cean assemblage, it is important to understand their ecology lins and others, 1990), is almost entirely absent from the
and distribution. Impoverished faunas similar to those found lake.
in Lake Sentani have been described elsewhere, and could The dominance of the arcellids and centropyxids coupled
be attributed to one or more of the distinct environmental with the dearth of difflugids may be a function of substrate
controls discussed below: brackish water conditions, low type. With the exception of the barren samples (S12A,
pH, anthropogenic contamination, substrate type, and envi- S14A) which contained a fair amount of mineral grains, all
ronmental conditions peculiar to tropical lakes. samples were rich in organic matter. Difflugids require min-
Moore and others (1995) proposed that Lake Sentani was eral grains to construct their tests and in the absence of such
an arm of the ocean well into the Holocene and that there will not be found in any appreciable numbers, if at all (Ha-
still might be saline wedges present at depth. Centropyxids, man, 1990; Scott and others, 1991). Arcellids produce their
primarily Centropyxis aculeata, are known to be opportu- tests autogenously, and centropyxids in Lake Sentani seen
nistic and capable of existing under hostile conditions (Pat- to be able to utilize diatom frustules to construct their tests
terson and others, 1996; Reinhardt and others, 1998) and (Plate 1, fig. 6e), so it is not surprising that they dominate
have been reported from brackish environments in coastal the organic-rich samples.
areas with salinities as high as 5‰ (Decloitre, 1953; Todd Other factors that control the geographic distribution of
and Bronnimann, 1957; Honig and Scott, 1987; Medioli and modern arcellaceans include the vegetation in and around
Scott, 1988; Hayward and others, 1996). Faunas similar to lakes and climatic conditions, which ultimately control wa-
those in Lake Sentani are found in cores from lakes in up- ter levels, chemistry, trophic levels, and the nature of a ther-
lifted coastal areas of New Brunswick, Canada, in intervals mocline, if present (Collins and others, 1990). The low di-
marking the transition from marine to freshwater conditions versity and dominance in all samples by Centropyxis acu-
(Patterson and others, 1985). However, water testing indi- leata and Arcella vulgaris indicate a stressed environment
cated no trace of salinity in any Lake Sentani sample. unlike any recorded in northern hemisphere temperate lakes.
Arcella vulgaris is an important component of the arcel- A characteristic of tropical oligomictic lakes like Lake Sen-
lacean faunas of Lake Sentani, dominating many samples. tani is very weak circulation with turnover occurring only
This species is commonly reported from boggy ponds in the every few years, thus resulting in diminished oxygen con-
Arctic and further south to Florida (Collins and others, tent (Wetzel, 1983).
1990), and is well adapted to the low pH typical of these Although our water temperature and oxygen data only
ponds. In James Lake of northeastern Ontario, A. vulgaris extend to 15 m depth, other work has shown ‘‘. . .that ox-
almost exclusively dominates low pH (2.0–5.5) environ- ygen stratification occurs in the western basin at 22 m
ments (Kumar and Patterson, 1997; Kumar and Patterson, depth’’ resulting in oligomictic conditions (Howard, 1987).
2000). However, in studies on lakes with varying pH in Although most of our samples are from the eastern region
northeastern Ontario it was found that centropyxids, so of the lake, the feeble stratification recorded by Howard
dominant in Lake Sentani, cannot tolerate low pH (⬍5.5) (1987) no doubt exists lakewide. This stratification ulti-
environments (Patterson and others, 1996; Reinhardt and mately results in the prolonged isolation of the lake bottom
others, 1998; Patterson and Kumar, 2000). Thus the abun- and progressively reduced oxygen levels. This would have
dance of centropyxids in Lake Sentani samples indicates in turn resulted in similarly reduced productivity among
that pH is not a controlling factor here, and the measured benthic organisms, as indicated by the stressed arcellacean
pH values of 7.1 to 7.2 for lake water at several depths in fauna. Qualitative reports on similar arcellacean faunas have
different localities corroborate this conclusion. been reported from Nigeria (Green, 1963) and Brazil
Centropyxid species found in the Cobalt area, northeast- (Green, 1975) suggesting that this fauna is widespread and
ern Ontario, such as Centropyxis aculeata often dominate characteristic of tropical lakes.
substrates contaminated by heavy metals and other indus- Although our data are sparse, the impact of prolonged
trial contaminants (Patterson and others, 1996; Reinhardt stratification on benthic organism productivity in these lakes
and others, 1998). No geochemical analysis was carried out is undoubtably strong enough to mask out most other lim-
on samples in Lake Sentani so this influence cannot be cat- nological signals, such as anthropogenic eutrophication.
egorically refuted. However, there is no major industry This could also provide a possible explanation for the dearth
there, and human habitation consists of only small villages of Difflugia oblonga in these samples, usually an excellent
along the shores and on the islands of Lake Sentani (Fig. indicator of eutrophication, despite other kinds of evidence
1). Sewage from houses in the villages goes directly into for lake eutrophication. Although it is dangerous to draw
←
opaque. 4 Difflugia oblonga ‘‘glans’’. Test ovoid with rounded fundus. 5 a Centropyxis aculeata ‘‘discoides’’. Same as ‘‘aculeata’’ but spines
absent. 5 b Arcella vulgaris. Test round, hyaline; aperture invaginate. 6 a–e Centropyxis aculeata ‘‘aculeata’’. 6 a–d This strain has a variable
number of spines. 6 e Enlargement of 6d showing imprints caused by diatoms, often used as xenogenous particles to construct arcellacean tests as
in the case of Lake Sentani centropyxids. All scale bars are 50 m.
140 DALBY, KUMAR, MOORE, AND PATTERSON
sweeping conclusions based on results from a single lake Cucurbitella [sic.] constricta REINHARDT and others 1998, pl. 1, fig. 6
we suggest that, because of the serious impact on produc- Diagnosis. Test shape varies from spherical, subspherical to elon-
tivity caused by stratification, benthic arcellacean faunas gated. It is characterized by a thick apertural lip.
may be seriously affected throughout most oligomictic
Centropyxis constricta (Ehrenberg 1843)
lakes. This probably means that the group, such an impor- strain: ‘‘constricta’’
tant limnological indicator in temperate lakes, is not useful
Arcella constricta EHRENBERG 1843, p. 410, pl. 4, fig. 35, pl. 5,
in a significant proportion of low latitude oligomictic lakes. fig. 1
Diagnosis. Test less flattened than strain ‘‘spinosa’’ with 3 or less
SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY spines on the fundus.
Although infrasubspecific variants are not considered val- Discussion. These specimens were fragile and became broken when
mounted on the scanning electron microscope plug.
id according to the International Code of Zoological No-
menclature (ICZN), their informal use is often useful in pa- Centropyxis constricta (Ehrenberg 1843)
leoecological studies. This is particularly true with regards strain: ‘‘spinosa’’
to arcellaceans as the species concept within this clonal Centropyxis spinosa CASH in CASH and HOPKINSON 1905, p. 135,
group is a highly subjective matter (see Deflandre, 1928; text figs. 26 a–c, pl. 16, fig. 15
Medioli and Scott, 1983; Medioli and Scott, 1988 for dis- Centropyxis spinosa Cash, OGDEN and HEDLEY 1980, p. 62, pl. 20,
cussion). For example, Reinhardt and others (1998) were figs. a–d
able to separate and define numerous distinct and stable ar- Diagnosis. Test more flattened than strain ‘‘constricta’’ with 3 or
cellacean strains that characterized various limnological more spines on the fundus.
Discussion. Only two specimens were found and they became bro-
conditions in northern Ontario lakes. In addition, Kumar and ken when mounted on the scanning electron microscope plug.
Dalby (1998) proposed a standardized key for lacustrine ar-
cellacean species and strains, which is used here. As this Family DIFFLUGIDAE Stein 1859
paper is not of a taxonomic nature, only abbreviated sys- Difflugia Leclerc in Lamarck 1816
Difflugia oblonga Ehrenberg 1832
tematic descriptions are included. strain ‘‘glans’’
(Plate 1; Figure 4)
Subphylum SARCODINA Schmarda 1871
Class RHIZOPODEA von Siebold 1845 Difflugia glans PENARD 1902
Subclass LOBOSA Carpenter 1861
Diagnosis. Test oval to ovoid, slightly elongated, fundus rounded,
Order ARCELLINIDA Kent 1880
neck absent, aperture circular with smooth lip, test made of fine sand
Superfamily ARCELLACEA Ehrenberg 1830
particles, small.
Family ARCELLIDAE Ehrenberg 1830
Arcella Ehrenberg 1830 Difflugia oblonga Ehrenberg 1832
Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg 1830 strain: ‘‘tenuis’’
(Plate 1; Figure 5b)
Difflugia pyriformis var. tenuis PENARD 1890, p. 138, pl. 3, figs. 47–49
Arcella vulgaris EHRENBERG 1830, p. 40, pl. 1, fig. 6
Diagnosis. Test elongated, ovoid almost bean shaped, fundus sub-
Diagnosis. Test depressed, hyaline, and autogenous, with an invag- rounded to subacute, neck indistinct or absent, aperture narrow and
inated aperture. circular with crenulated lip, test made of generally medium to fine sand
grains.
Family CENTROPYXIDIDAE Deflandre 1953 Discussion. Only one specimen was found and it became broken.
Centropyxis Stein 1859
Centropyxis aculeata (Ehrenberg 1832) Difflugia protaeiformis Lamarck 1816
strain: ‘‘aculeata’’ strain: ‘‘claviformis’’
(Plate 1; Figure 6 a–e) (Plate 1; Figure 3)
Arcella aculeata EHRENBERG 1832, p. 91 Difflugia protaeiformis LAMARCK 1816, p. 95 (with reference to
Diagnosis. Test depressed, circular with 1–8 spines on postero-lat- material in a manuscript by Leclerc)
eral margin. Difflugia pyriformis var. claviformis PENARD 1899, p. 25, pl. 2, figs.
12–14
Centropyxis aculeata (Ehrenberg 1832) Difflugia claviformis OGDEN and HEDLEY 1980, p. 126, pl. 52, figs.
strain: ‘‘discoides’’ a–d
(Plate 1; Figure 5a) Diagnosis. Test elongated almost cylindroconical, fundus acuminate,
Arcella discoides EHRENBERG 1843, p. 139 tapering to form a blunt spine, neck absent, aperture circular, narrow
Arcella discoides Ehrenberg, EHRENBERG 1872, p. 259, pl. 3, fig. 1 without lip, test made up of medium to coarse grained sand
Arcella discoides Ehrenberg, LEIDY 1879, p. 173, pl. 28, figs. 14–38
Centropyxis aculeata var. discoides PENARD 1890, p. 150, pl. 5, figs. INCERTA
38–41
Centropyxis discoides Penard [sic], OGDEN and HEDLEY 1980, p. Incerta sp. A
54, pl. 16, figs. a–e (Plate 1; Figure 1 a–e)
Diagnosis. Test depressed, circular almost ‘‘doughnut shaped’’ with-
Diagnosis. Agglutinated sphere with no discernible aperture.
out spines.
Discussion. This could be an encystment of an arcellacean or the
aperture has been covered (F. Medioli, oral communication, 1997)
Centropyxis constricta (Ehrenberg 1843)
strain: ‘‘aerophila’’
(Plate 1; Figure 2 a–b) REFERENCES
Centropyxis aerophila DEFLANDRE 1929 ASIOLI, A., MEDIOLI, F. S., and PATTERSON, R. T., 1996, Thecamoe-
Centropyxis aerophila Deflandre OGDEN and HEDLEY 1980, p. 48–49 bians as a tool for reconstruction of paleoenvironments in some
ARCELLACEANS FROM LAKE SENTANI INDONESIA 141
Italian lakes in the foothills of the southern Alps (Orta, Varese amoebe rhizopoden von Java und Sumatra: Treubia 17, p. 209–
and Candia): Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 26, p. 248– 256.
263. , and , 1946, Thekamoebe sphagnumrhizopoden van
CANADIAN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY, 1985, Sentani Buitenzorg (Java): Biol. Jaarb. 13, p. 112–126.
Lake Hydro Electric Development Assessment. HOWARD, K. T., 1987, Inland Fisheries Development Irian Jaya: Gov-
CARPENTER, W. B., 1861, On the systematic arrangement of the Rhi- ernment of Indonesia/UNDP/IRBD Regional Planning Investiga-
zopoda: Natural History Review, v. 1, p. 456–472. tion, Preparation and Experimental Area Development Project,
CARTER, H. J., 1856a, Notes on the fresh water Infusoria of the island Nusa Tenggara, Southeast Sulawesi and Irian Jaya.
of Bombay, No 1, Organization: Annals and Magazine of Natural KENT, W. S., 1880, A Manual of the Infusoria: Including a description
History, ser. 2, v. 18, no. 104, p. 115–132. of all known flagellate, ciliate, and tentaculiferous Protozoa, Brit-
, 1856b, Notes on the freshwater Infusoria of the island of Bom- ish and foreign, and an account of the organisation and affinities
bay, No. 1, Organization: Annals and Magazine of Natural His- of the sponges, London: Bogue, v. 1, p. 1–472.
tory, ser. 2, v. 18, no. 105, p. 221–249. KUMAR, A., and DALBY, A. P., 1998, Identification key for Holocene
, 1864, On fresh water Rhizopoda of England and India: Annals lacustrine arcellacean (thecamoebian) taxa: Palaeontologia Elec-
and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 3, v. 13, p. 18–39. tronica, v. 1, 34 p.
, 1865, On the fresh and salt water Rhizopoda of England and , and PATTERSON, R. T., 1997, Arcellaceans (thecamoebians)
India: Annals and Magazine of Natural History, ser. 3, v. 15, p. as proxies of lake bottom acidity: An example from James Lake,
277–293. northeastern Ontario: Abstract, GAC/MAC Annual Meeting, May
CASH, J., and HOPKINSON, J., 1905, The British freshwater Rhizopoda 19–21, 1997, Ottawa, Canada, p. A-150.
and Heliozoa: Vol. II: Rhizopoda, Part II: Ray Society, London, , and , in press, Arcellaceans (Thecamoebians): New
151 p. tools for monitoring long and short term changes in lake bottom
COLLINS, E. S., MCCARTHY, F. M., MEDIOLI, F. S., SCOTT, D. B., and acidity: Environmental Geology.
HONIG, C. A., 1990, Biogeographic distribution of modern the- LAMARCK, J. B., 1816, Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertèbres:
Verdière, Paris, v. 2, p. 1–568.
camoebians in a transect along the eastern North American coast,
LEIDY, J., 1879, Fresh water rhizopods of North America: United
in Hemleben, C., Kaminski, M. A., Kuhnt, W., and Scott, D. B.
States Geological Survey of the Territories Report 12, p. 1–324.
(eds.), Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Tax-
MCCARTHY, F. M. G., COLLINS, E. S., MCANDREWS, J. H., KERR, H.
onomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera: North Atlantic Treaty Or-
A., SCOTT, D. G., and MEDIOLI, F. S., 1995, A comparison of
ganization Advanced Study Institute Series, Series C, Mathemat-
postglacial arcellacean (‘‘thecamoebian’’) and pollen succession in
ical and Physical Sciences, v. 327, p. 783–791.
Atlantic Canada, illustrating the potential of arcellaceans for pa-
DECLOITRE, L., 1953, Recherches sur les rhizopodes thécamoebiens
leoclimatic reconstruction: Journal of Paleontology, v. 69, p. 980–
d’A.O.F.: Mémoires de l’Institut Français d’Afrique Noire, no. 31,
993.
p. 1–249.
MEDIOLI, F. S., and SCOTT, D. B., 1983, Holocene Arcellacea (The-
DEFLANDRE, G., 1928, Le genre Arcella Ehrenberg, Morphologie - camoebians) from eastern Canada: Cushman Foundation For Fo-
Biologie, Essai phylogénétique et systématique: Archiv für Pro- raminiferal Research Special Publication 21, 63 p.
tistenkunde, v. 64, p. 152–287. , and , 1988, Lacustrine thecamoebians (mainly arcel-
, 1929, Le genre Centropyxis Stein: Archiv für Protistenkunde, laceans) as potential tools for palaeolimnological interpretations:
v. 67, p. 322–375. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 62, p.
, 1953, Ordres des Testaceolobosa (De Saedeleer, 1834), Tes- 361–386.
taceofilosa (De Saedeleer, 1834), Thalamia (Haeckel, 1862) ou , , COLLINS, E. S., and MCCARTHY, F. M. G., 1990,
Thécamoebiens (Auct.) (Rhizopoda Testacea), in Grassé, P.-P. Fossil thecamoebians: present status and prospects for the future,
(ed.), Traité de Zoologie: Masson, Paris, v. 1, p. 97–148. in Hemleben, C., Kaminski, M. A., Kuhnt, W., and Scott, D. B.
EHRENBERG, C. G., 1830, Organisation, systematik und geographisch- (eds.), Paleoecology, Biostratigraphy, Paleoceanography and Tax-
es Verhältnis der Infusionsthierchen, Berlin: Druckerei der Kön- onomy of Agglutinated Foraminifera, North Atlantic Treaty Or-
iglichen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 108 p. ganization Advanced Study Institute Series, Series C: Mathemat-
, 1832, Über die Entwicklung und Lebensdauer der Infusion- ical and Physical Sciences, v. 327, p. 813–840.
sthiere, nebst ferneren Beiträgen zu einer Vergleichung ihrer or- MOORE, J. M., ROCCHI, A., and RENYAAN, S. J., 1995, Lake Systems
ganischen Systeme: Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu in Irian Jaya: Unpublished poster presentation, Biological Society
Berlin Physikalische Abhandlungen, v. 1831, p. 1–154. of New Guinea, Annual Meeting, Tabubil, Papua New Guinea,
, 1843, Verbreitung und Einfluss des mikroskopischen Lebens August 27–31, 1995.
in Süd-und Nord Amerika: Königliche Akademie der Wissen- OGDEN, C. G., and HEDLEY, R. H., 1980, An Atlas of Freshwater
schaften zu Berlin Physikalische Abhandlungen, v. 1841, p. 291– Testate Amoeba: British Museum (Natural History), Oxford Uni-
446. versity Press, 222 p.
, 1872, Nacthrag zur Übersicht der organischen Atmosphärilien: PATTERSON, R. T., and KUMAR, A., 2000, Use of Arcellacea (Theca-
Königliche Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin Physikalische moebians) to gauge levels of contamination and remediation in
Abhandlungen, v. 1871, p. 233–275. industrially polluted lakes, in Martin, R. E. (ed.), Environmental
GREEN, J., 1963, Zooplankton of the River Sokoto, the Rhizopoda Micropaleontology, Plenum Press, p. 257–278.
Testacea: Proceedings of the Zoological Society, London, v. 141, , MACKINNON, K. D., SCOTT, D. B., and MEDIOLI, F. S., 1985,
p. 497–514. Arcellaceans (Thecamoebians) in small lakes of New Brunswick
, 1975, Fresh water ecology in the Mato Grasso, Central Brazil, and Nova Scotia: Modern distribution and Holocene stratigraphic
IV: Associations of Testate Rhizopoda: Journal of Natural History, changes: Journal of Foraminiferal Research, v. 15, p. 114–137.
v. 9, p. 545–560. , BARKER, T., and BURBIDGE, S. M., 1996, Arcellaceans (the-
HAMAN, D., 1990, Living thecamoebinid distribution, biotopes and camoebians) as proxies of arsenic and mercury contamination in
biofacies, in an upper deltaic plain lacustrine subenvironment, Lac northeastern Ontario lakes: Journal of Foraminiferal Research v.
des Allemands, Louisiana: Revista Espanola de Micropaleonto- 26, p. 172–183.
logia, v. 22, p. 87–100. PENARD, E., 1890, Études sur les Rhizopodes d’eau douce: Mémoires
HAYWARD, B. W., GRENEL, H., CAIRNS, G., and SMITH, A., 1996, de la Société de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève, v.
Environmental controls on benthic foraminiferal and thecamoe- 31, no. 2, p. 1–230.
bian associations in a New Zealand tidal inlet: Journal of Fora- , 1899, Les Rhizopodes de faune profonde dans le lac Léman:
miniferal Research, v. 26, p. 150–171. Revue Suisse de Zoologie, v. 7, p. 1–142.
HONIG, C. A., and SCOTT, D. B., 1987, Post glacial stratigraphy and , 1902, Faune Rhizopodique du Bassin du Léman: Henry Kun-
sea-level change in southwestern New Brunswick: Canadian Jour- dig, Genève, 714 p.
nal of Earth Science, v. 24, p. 354–364. REINHARDT, E. G., DALBY, A. P., KUMAR, A., and PATTERSON, R. T.,
HOOGENRAAD, H. R., and GROOT, A. A., 1940, Moosbewhnende thek- 1998, Utility of arcellacean phenotypic variants as pollution in-
142 DALBY, KUMAR, MOORE, AND PATTERSON
dicators in mine tailing contaminated lakes near Cobalt, Ontario, SUDZUKI, M., 1979, Marine interstetial Testacea from Plau Pinang,
Canada: Micropaleontology, v. 44, no. 2, 131–148. Malaysia: Anot. Zool. Japan, v. 52, p. 50–53.
SCHMARDA, L. K., 1871, Zoologie: Band I: Braumüller, Wien, 372 p. TODD, R., and BRONNIMANN, P., 1957, Recent Foraminifera and The-
SCOTT, D. B., and HERMELIN, J. O. R., 1993, A device for precision camoebina from the eastern Gulf of Paria: Cushman Foundation
splitting of micropaleontological samples in liquid suspension: of Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication no. 3, p. 1–25.
Journal of Paleontology, v. 67, p. 151–154. VAN OYE, P., 1949, Rhizopodes de Java: Bijdr. Dierk, v. 28, p. 327–
, and MEDIOLI, F. S., 1983, Testate rhizopods in Lake Erie: 352.
modern distribution and stratigraphic implications: Journal of Pa- VON SIEBOLD, C. T. E., 1845, Wirbellose Thiere: part 1, in von Siebold,
leontology, v. 57, p. 809–820. C. T. E., and von Stannius, H. (eds.), Lehrbuch der Vergleichenden
SCOTT, D. B., SUTER, J. R., and KOSTERS, E. C., 1991, Marsh fora- Anatomie, p. 1–679.
minifera and arcellaceans of the lower Mississippi Delta: controls WETZEL, R. G., 1983, Fate of heat, Chapter 6, in Limnology, Second
on spatial distributions: Micropaleontology, v. 37, p. 373–392. Edition: Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, p. 71–97.
STEIN, S. F. N., 1859, Über die ihm aus eigener Untersuchung bekannt
gewordenen Susswässer-Rhizopoden: Abhandlungen der Koenig-
lichen Boehmischen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften, v. 5, no. 10, Received 18 December 1998
p. 41–43. Accepted 10 December 1999