Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms On The Bot-IOT Dataset

This paper compares 5 machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, KNN, Naive Bayes, SVM, Neural Network) for detecting botnet traffic in IoT devices using a dataset of network features. The Decision Tree achieved the highest accuracy (>90%) according to experimental results, demonstrating its effectiveness at intrusion detection in IoT environments. However, the paper notes other factors like complexity and interpretability should also be considered for real-world use. Overall, the study shows machine learning can help identify threats in IoT networks.

Uploaded by

belej40682
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms On The Bot-IOT Dataset

This paper compares 5 machine learning algorithms (Decision Tree, KNN, Naive Bayes, SVM, Neural Network) for detecting botnet traffic in IoT devices using a dataset of network features. The Decision Tree achieved the highest accuracy (>90%) according to experimental results, demonstrating its effectiveness at intrusion detection in IoT environments. However, the paper notes other factors like complexity and interpretability should also be considered for real-world use. Overall, the study shows machine learning can help identify threats in IoT networks.

Uploaded by

belej40682
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Algorithms on the Bot-IOT

Dataset
Jay Soni (20CS43)
Computer Science & Engineering Department
Engineering College, Ajmer

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a comparative analysis of five machine learning algorithms—Decision Tree,
K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural
Network—applied to the Bot-IoT dataset. The dataset, collected from IoT devices, contains
various features related to network traffic and communication patterns. The aim of this study is
to assess the accuracy of these algorithms in distinguishing between normal and botnet traffic.
Experimental results demonstrate the varying performance of the algorithms and provide
insights into their suitability for intrusion detection in IoT environments.

1. INTRODUCTION
In today's interconnected world, the Internet of Things (IoT) has become an integral part
of our lives, enabling communication and data exchange among various devices and
systems. However, this increasing connectivity also brings about new security
challenges, especially in the context of cyber threats and attacks. One of the significant
concerns is the emergence of botnets, which are networks of compromised devices
controlled by malicious actors for various illicit activities, such as distributed
denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks and data exfiltration. The ability to detect and mitigate
such threats is crucial for ensuring the security and reliability of IoT networks.
Intrusion detection plays a pivotal role in identifying and thwarting cyber threats within
IoT environments. Machine learning algorithms have gained prominence as effective
tools for intrusion detection due to their capability to analyze large volumes of data and
uncover patterns indicative of malicious activities. In this context, the "bot-iot dataset"
serves as a valuable resource for evaluating the performance of machine learning
algorithms in distinguishing normal network traffic from botnet-related activities.
This study focuses on the comparative analysis of five prominent machine learning
algorithms: Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes, Support Vector
Machine (SVM), and Neural Network. Each of these algorithms approaches the task of

1
intrusion detection from a unique perspective, leveraging their respective strengths in
feature representation, pattern recognition, and decision-making. By evaluating the
accuracy of these algorithms on the "bot-iot dataset," we aim to gain insights into their
suitability for identifying botnet-related activities within IoT environments.

Algorithms Under Consideration:


● Decision Tree: Decision trees employ a tree-like structure to make sequential
decisions based on input features. These models are interpretable and capable
of handling both categorical and numerical data, making them well-suited for
identifying distinct decision boundaries.
● K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN): KNN operates on the principle that similar
instances tend to have similar labels. By comparing an instance to its neighboring
instances in the feature space, KNN assigns labels based on the majority class
among its k-nearest neighbors.
● Naive Bayes: Naive Bayes relies on Bayes' theorem to compute the probability
of a certain label given the observed features. Despite its simplifying assumption
of feature independence, Naive Bayes has shown effectiveness in various
classification tasks.
● Support Vector Machine (SVM): SVM seeks to find a hyperplane that
maximizes the margin between different classes while correctly classifying
instances. It is particularly powerful in cases where classes are not linearly
separable.
● Neural Network (NN): Neural networks, inspired by the human brain, consist of
interconnected nodes that mimic neurons. Deep learning architectures, a subset
of neural networks, have demonstrated exceptional performance in complex
pattern recognition tasks.
The subsequent sections of this paper will delve into the methodologies used,
experimental results obtained, and an in-depth discussion of the performance of these
algorithms on the "bot-iot dataset." The insights gained from this analysis will aid in
making informed decisions regarding the selection of an appropriate machine learning
algorithm for intrusion detection within IoT environments.

2. Related Work
In recent years, the increasing prevalence of IoT devices and the corresponding surge in
cyber threats have spurred extensive research in the domain of intrusion detection for
IoT environments. Detecting malicious activities in these interconnected networks is
challenging due to the diverse range of devices, communication protocols, and data
characteristics. Various studies have explored the application of machine learning
algorithms for identifying anomalies and attacks within IoT ecosystems.

Khan et al. [1] presented a comprehensive survey of intrusion detection techniques for
IoT networks. The study highlighted the significance of machine learning approaches
and discussed the challenges posed by the dynamic nature of IoT data. Similarly,
Antoniades et al. [2] conducted an empirical evaluation of machine learning algorithms

2
for intrusion detection in IoT environments. Their findings underscored the importance of
algorithm selection based on the characteristics of the dataset.

The subsequent sections will detail the methodology employed for the comparative
analysis of the algorithms on the "bot-iot dataset.”

3. Methodology
The methodology section outlines the steps and techniques employed in conducting the
comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms on the "bot-iot dataset."

Dataset Preprocessing: Before commencing the analysis, the "bot-iot dataset"


underwent preprocessing to ensure its suitability for machine learning. This involved
handling missing values, encoding categorical features, and scaling numerical features.
Any redundant or irrelevant attributes were removed to enhance the quality of the data.

Algorithm Selection: Five machine learning algorithms were chosen for this
comparative analysis: Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes, Support
Vector Machine (SVM), and Neural Network. Each algorithm possesses unique
characteristics and capabilities that make it well-suited for the task of intrusion detection
within IoT environments.

Model Training and Evaluation: The dataset was divided into training and testing
subsets using a standard 80-20 split. The training subset was used to train each of the
selected algorithms, while the testing subset was reserved for evaluating their
performance. To ensure fair comparison, the same training and testing data were used
for all algorithms.
For each algorithm, the training data underwent feature scaling to ensure uniformity in
feature ranges. The scaled features were then used to train the respective algorithm
models. Post-training, the models were evaluated on the testing data to calculate
accuracy scores.

Evaluation Metrics: The performance of the algorithms was assessed using:-


● Accuracy
● Precision
● Recall
● F1-score
These metrics offer a comprehensive view of the algorithms' capabilities in correctly
classifying instances of normal and botnet traffic.

4. Experimental Results

3
Boxplot for Accuracy, Precision, Recall and F-1 Score:

4
5. Discussion and Analysis
The discussion and analysis section delves into the performance of each machine
learning algorithm on the "bot-iot dataset," offering insights into their strengths and
limitations.

Among the tested algorithms, the Decision Tree demonstrated the highest accuracy,
precision, recall, and F1-score, all surpassing 0.9. Decision Trees excel at partitioning
feature space to distinguish classes, making them effective for intrusion detection.

Practical deployment requires considering factors beyond accuracy, including algorithm


complexity, interpretability, and generalization ability. Data imbalance and feature
relevance impact algorithm performance.

Future research can explore ensemble methods and hyperparameter tuning to enhance
algorithm performance.

In conclusion, the Decision Tree's superior performance highlights its potential for robust
intrusion detection, but algorithm selection should align with deployment needs.

6. Conclusion
In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of five prominent machine learning
algorithms—Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Naive Bayes, Support Vector
Machine (SVM), and Neural Network—for intrusion detection within IoT environments
using the "bot-iot dataset." Each algorithm's performance was evaluated based on
accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

Among the algorithms, the Decision Tree emerged as the top performer, achieving the
highest scores across all metrics. Its ability to create decision rules based on features
allowed it to effectively distinguish between normal and botnet traffic. Naive Bayes and
Support Vector Machine achieved competitive accuracy scores, indicating their
effectiveness in IoT intrusion detection. However, consideration of algorithm complexity,
interpretability, and generalization ability is crucial for practical deployment.

The study's findings underscore the applicability of machine learning algorithms in


identifying anomalous activities within IoT networks. The Decision Tree's outstanding
performance highlights its potential as a robust intrusion detection tool. Nonetheless, the
choice of algorithm should align with specific deployment requirements and
considerations.

This analysis provides valuable insights for selecting suitable machine learning
algorithms for IoT intrusion detection, contributing to enhanced network security and
resilience in the face of evolving cyber threats.

5
As IoT ecosystems continue to grow, future research can explore ensemble techniques,
hyperparameter optimization, and real-time adaptation to further advance intrusion
detection capabilities.

By understanding the strengths and limitations of each algorithm, practitioners can make
informed decisions to protect IoT networks and ensure the integrity of interconnected
devices.

With this conclusion, the study encapsulates its outcomes and implications, paving the
way for informed decision-making in IoT intrusion detection strategies.

7. References:
● Khan, R., & Khan, S. U. (2017). A comprehensive survey of recent trends in IoT
security. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(3), 2887-2925.
● Antoniades, D., & Loukas, G. (2019). Adversarial machine learning in the Internet
of Things: A systematic survey. IEEE Access, 7, 107652-107674.
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos, Nour Moustafa, Elena Sitnikova, and Benjamin Turnbull.
"Towards the development of realistic botnet dataset in the internet of things for
network forensic analytics: Bot-iot dataset." Future Generation Computer
Systems 100 (2019): 779-796. Public Access Here.
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos, Nour Moustafa, Elena Sitnikova, and Jill Slay. "Towards
developing network forensic mechanism for botnet activities in the iot based on
machine learning techniques." In International Conference on Mobile Networks
and Management, pp. 30-44. Springer, Cham, 2017.
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos, Nour Moustafa, and Elena Sitnikova. "A new network
forensic framework based on deep learning for Internet of Things networks: A
particle deep framework." Future Generation Computer Systems 110 (2020):
91-106.
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos, and Nour Moustafa. "Enhancing network forensics with
particle swarm and deep learning: The particle deep framework." arXiv preprint
arXiv:2005.00722 (2020).
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos, Nour Moustafa, Francesco Schiliro, Praveen Gauravaram,
and Helge Janicke. "A Holistic Review of Cybersecurity and Reliability
Perspectives in Smart Airports." IEEE Access (2020).
● Koroniotis, Nickolaos. "Designing an effective network forensic framework for the
investigation of botnets in the Internet of Things." PhD diss., The University of
New South Wales Australia, 2020.

You might also like