Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 23 views

    COURT REPORTING (1) Chushma

    Uploaded by

    Chushmachowdary Golla
    The document summarizes the author's observations from a family court in Bangalore, India. It describes a divorce case between Sri. Varshith Namakudi and Prathusha Nagadi heard by Hon'ble Justice S. Nataraj. The marriage was registered in 2020 and the couple lived together until December 2021 when differences developed. Both parties agreed the marriage could not be reconciled and decided to dissolve it through mutual consent. The court heard arguments and scheduled further proceedings on a future date, as judgments are not usually delivered immediately but can take years after considering all evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    COURT REPORTING (1) Chushma

    Uploaded by

    Chushmachowdary Golla
    23 views2 pages
    The document summarizes the author's observations from a family court in Bangalore, India. It describes a divorce case between Sri. Varshith Namakudi and Prathusha Nagadi heard by Hon'ble Justice S. Nataraj. The marriage was registered in 2020 and the couple lived together until December 2021 when differences developed. Both parties agreed the marriage could not be reconciled and decided to dissolve it through mutual consent. The court heard arguments and scheduled further proceedings on a future date, as judgments are not usually delivered immediately but can take years after considering all evidence.

    Original Title

    COURT REPORTING (1) chushma

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document summarizes the author's observations from a family court in Bangalore, India. It describes a divorce case between Sri. Varshith Namakudi and Prathusha Nagadi heard by Hon'ble Justice S. Nataraj. The marriage was registered in 2020 and the couple lived together until December 2021 when differences developed. Both parties agreed the marriage could not be reconciled and decided to dissolve it through mutual consent. The court heard arguments and scheduled further proceedings on a future date, as judgments are not usually delivered immediately but can take years after considering all evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    23 views2 pages

    COURT REPORTING (1) Chushma

    Uploaded by

    Chushmachowdary Golla
    The document summarizes the author's observations from a family court in Bangalore, India. It describes a divorce case between Sri. Varshith Namakudi and Prathusha Nagadi heard by Hon'ble Justice S. Nataraj. The marriage was registered in 2020 and the couple lived together until December 2021 when differences developed. Both parties agreed the marriage could not be reconciled and decided to dissolve it through mutual consent. The court heard arguments and scheduled further proceedings on a future date, as judgments are not usually delivered immediately but can take years after considering all evidence.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    COURT REPORTING

    My report on the court room observations is from the Family Court, Bangalore.
    Before attending the court, I consulted an advocate, as some cases such as
    youth cases are not open to the public. Firstly, I attended to the Family court,
    Bangalore-560027. Which is located at Siddaiah road, Sudhama Nagar,
    Bangalore, Karnataka. On 18th of september,2023. At 01.00pm in the court
    room no. 09, the matter was dealt by Hon’ble justice S.Nataraj There was a
    divorce case going on. The layout of the courtroom was simple there was no
    raised layers except for judges. Also, there was no presence of police.
    The case I have heard was about suit for divorce under section 13(b) of Hindu
    Marriage Act, 1955, which was proposed before the PRL JUDGE FAMILY
    COURT,as I mentioned above. It was a case of FR-236/2023 and
    M.C.No.239/2023 between the Petitioner 1 (sri. VARSHITH
    NAMAKUDI) And Petitioner 2(PRATHUSHA NAGADI) and the advocate
    for the petitioners isD.C. Natish , Advocate from D.C.N and Associates.
    The case was a divorce petition that the said petitioner no. 1 and 2 are the
    Husband and Wife. The marriage of the 2nd petitioner with the 1st petitioner
    was solemnized on 23-12-2020 before at the Samskruthi banquet hall in the
    presence of elders, well wishers and friends from both the petitioners family
    as per the Hindu Customs and Rites and the said marriage is registered as
    marriage number LAG-HM542-2019-2020 on 28.01.2021 at office of the
    registrar of marriages, Agara, Bangalore . it was further said that the
    petitioners lived together till 27-12-2021 as husband and wife and thereafter
    on account of marital incompatibility differences developed between the
    petitioners .
    Later the petitioners found out that, there was lack of compatibility of mind
    on several issues and they reached a stage where the petitioner cannot
    reconcile themselves and in spite of their best efforts and lived separately from
    27-12-2021. They come to a feeling that they cannot live together as a
    husband and wife and no use to continue the marital tie and both of them
    have consciously decided to get their marriage dissolved by seeking dissolution
    of the marriage through mutual consent.

    1
    Later on, after the arguments of the petitioner:
     The 1st petitioner agreed to pay a sum of 9,45,000 (Nine Lakh
    Fourty Five Thousand Rupees only) to the 2nd petitioner.
     The both petitioners agreed to close their joint Home Loan and Joint
    Bank Account.
     The both parties should not interfere in each other’s personal or
    professional lives hereafter.
     The petitioners should settle the jewellery and other belongings as
    engagement rings, vehicles and other items given at the time of
    marriage.
    This was the information that I borrowed from the advocate, as the date of the
    further proceeding was given to the future date.

    CONCLUSION
    As I have seen from my visit to the Family Court, I observed that proper facts
    and clear information is required as the judges wants to examine the
    documents and evidences which the petitioner submit before passing a
    judgement. And also noticed that the judgement wont be given on the same
    date of the arguments, but the case will be extended to a different date and
    some times it can take years for passing of a judgement because they have to
    take all the measures before coming to the conclusion.
    In reference to legal skills, all the advocates were able to present these. Legal
    skills refer to effective research, communication and organised skills. All the
    parties seemed to be fully prepared. Another important observation was the
    role of advocates, how they present the given case. It is important for an
    advocate to be a good observer and a listener.

    You might also like