June 2019 MS - Paper 2 (F) Edexcel Physics GCSE
June 2019 MS - Paper 2 (F) Edexcel Physics GCSE
June 2019 MS - Paper 2 (F) Edexcel Physics GCSE
Mark Scheme
(Results)
Summer 2019
Pearson Edexcel
In Physics (1PH0) Paper 2F
PMT
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body. We
provide a wide range of qualifications including academic, vocational, occupational and specific
programmes for employers. For further information visit our qualifications websites at
www.edexcel.com or www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on
our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help everyone progress
in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of learning, for all kinds of people,
wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved in education for over 150 years, and by
working across 70 countries, in 100 languages, we have built an international reputation for our
commitment to high standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out
more about how we can help you and your students at:www.pearson.com/uk
Summer 2019
Publications Code 1PH0_2F_1906_MS
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2019
PMT
• All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the first
candidate in exactly the same way as they mark the last.
• Mark schemes should be applied positively. Candidates must be rewarded for what
they have shown they can do rather than penalised for omissions.
• Examiners should mark according to the mark scheme not according to their
perception of where the grade boundaries may lie.
• There is no ceiling on achievement. All marks on the mark scheme should be used
appropriately.
• All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded. Examiners should
always award full marks if deserved, i.e. if the answer matches the mark
scheme. Examiners should also be prepared to award zero marks if the
candidate’s response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme.
• Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by
which marks will be awarded and exemplification may be limited.
• When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark scheme to a
candidate’s response, the team leader must be consulted.
• Crossed out work should be marked UNLESS the candidate has replaced it with an
alternative response.
PMT
Mark schemes have been developed so that the rubrics of each mark scheme reflects the characteristics
of the skills within the AO being targeted and the requirements of the command word. So for example
the command word ‘Explain’ requires an identification of a point and then reasoning/justification of the
point.
Explain questions can be asked across all AOs. The distinction comes whether the identification is via a
judgment made to reach a conclusion, or, making a point through application of knowledge to
reason/justify the point made through application of understanding. It is the combination and linkage of
the marking points that is needed to gain full marks.
When marking questions with a ‘describe’ or ‘explain’ command word, the detailed marking guidance
below should be consulted to ensure consistency of marking.
More than one line from a box on the left loses the mark
for that box.
If no substitution seen
4.5 or 450 scores 1 mark
only
Accept recognisable
spellings of coulomb
allow the
pressure will be
higher for the
same volume for
2 marks
allow the
volumes will be
higher for the
same pressure
for 2 marks
PMT
evaluation
0.1 (MPa) award full marks
for the correct
answer without
working
evaluation
11 (1) accept 11.25, 11.2, 11.3
no POT error in
evaluation
unit (1)
joule(s)/J independent mark
j , Nm
rearrangement (1)
(t=) 670 000
3500
evaluation (1)
190(s) accept any answer that
round to 190(s)
rub the rod with a cloth (1) allow clean off the rod
or friction (with the
rod)
movement of
unnamed charges can
score third mark
air becomes a
air is ionised (1) conductor
dangers
• friction as fuel flows through pipe
• build-up of (electrostatic) charge
• potential difference between nozzle and plane
• causes spark
• explosion or fire
Descriptor
• No rewardable material.
• Demonstrates elements of physics understanding, some of which is inaccurate.
Understanding of scientific ideas lacks detail. (AO1)
• Demonstrates physics understanding, which is mostly relevant but may include some
inaccuracies. Understanding of scientific ideas is not fully detailed and/or developed. (AO1)
• Presents an explanation that has a structure which is mostly clear, coherent and logical.
(AO1)
• Presents an explanation that has a well-developed structure which is clear, coherent and
logical. (AO1)
PMT
0 No rewardable material.
evaluation (1)
0.94(3) (J) 0.9 (J)
values that round to
0.92 or 0.93
(from using g = 9.8 or
9.81)
no POT error in
evaluation
substitution (1)
(KE =) ½ x (0.0)46 x 3.52
height/it (nearly)
halves each time
scores 2 marks
rearrangement (1)
(R =) 5.0 (R =) V
0.26 I
5.0
scores 2 marks
0.26
accept answer
written in table if
not written on
answer line.
Descriptor
• No rewardable material.
• Demonstrates elements of physics understanding, some of which is
inaccurate. Understanding of scientific ideas lacks detail. (AO1)
0 No rewardable material.
one from
chemical energy (stored) in battery
OR
energy dissipated / {released as light
or thermal} energy in surroundings