Blue Carbon Climate Change
Blue Carbon Climate Change
RESOURCES INSTITUTE
Creating Innovative Solutions for a Sustainable Future
POLICY BRIEF
SEPTEMBER 2020
Authors
Dr Ajay Mathur, Director General, TERI
Dr JV Sharma, Director, Land Resources, TERI
Dr Priyanka, Research Associate, Land Resources, TERI
Dr Aparna Tyagi, Research Associate, Land Resources, TERI
Reviewer
Dr Sharad Singh Negi, Retired IFS, Vice Chairman, Migration Commission, Uttarakhand
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Children’s Investment Fund Foundation (CIFF)
for their financial support.
Published by
The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI)
Introduction
Coastal ecosystems are some of the most productive and endangered marine species, and food security for
natural systems on Earth and are home to a wealth of many coastal communities around the world (Kennedy
biodiversity. They provide us with essential ecosystem 1984; Robertson and Alongi 1992; King and Lester 1995;
services, such as coastal protection from storms and Hogarth 1999; Beck, Heck, Able, et al. 2001; Kathiresan
nursery grounds for fish. Coastal and marine ecosystems and Bingham 2001; Saenger 2002; Mumby 2006; Gedan,
encompass a wide range of important habitats, which Silliman, and Bertness 2009; Barbier, Hacker, Kennedy,
include coral reefs, mangroves, seagrass meadows, tidal et al. 2011; Sousa, Lillebø, Risgaard-Petersen, et al. 2012;
marshes, sand dune systems, and salt marshes. They Cullen-Unsworth and Unsworth 2013). An estimated 151
are among the planet’s greatest carbon storehouses, countries around the world contain at least one of these
with CO2 burial rates (i.e., rates at which carbon is coastal wetland ecosystems, and 71 countries contain all
converted into biomass through photosynthesis) 20 the three. Blue carbon is the carbon stored in mangroves,
times greater than any other terrestrial ecosystem, tidal salt marshes, and seagrass meadows within the
including boreal and tropical forests (Hamilton 2018). soil, aboveground living biomass (leaves, branches,
Their role in sequestering and storing ‘blue’ carbon from stems), belowground living biomass (roots), and non-
the atmosphere and oceans is also increasingly being living biomass. The carbon that is stored in the coastal
recognized by policymakers worldwide. The three types ecosystems can be extensive and can remain trapped for
of coastal wetlands—mangroves, seagrasses, and tidal very long periods (it can be centuries to millennia) and
salt marshes–commonly referred to as blue carbon thus result in very large carbon stocks. Due to coastal
ecosystems–provide a full spectrum of mitigation, development and land-use change, mangroves, tidal
adaptation, and resilience benefits. These wetlands salt marshes, and seagrasses are under great pressure.
provide numerous benefits and services that contribute The significant difference in the soil carbon accumulated
to people’s ability to mitigate and adapt to the impact in the terrestrial and the coastal ecosystems is that
of climate change. Many of these services are essential potential carbon storage in upland soil is limited by high
for climate adaptation and resilience along coasts, availability of oxygen, allowing for aerobic microbial
including protection from storm surge and sea-level rise, carbon oxidation and release back into the atmosphere
prevention of erosion along shorelines, coastal water (Schlesinger and Lichter 2001). However, in blue carbon
quality regulation, nutrient recycling, sediment trapping, ecosystems, the soil is saturated with water keeping it
habitat provision for numerous commercially important in anaerobic state (low to no oxygen), and it continually
Policy Brief
2
accretes vertically at high rates, resulting in continuous CO2 from atmosphere/ocean through photosynthesis
build-up of carbon over time (Chmura, Anisfeld, Cahoon, (primary production) and convert it for use by plant
et al. 2003). tissue (such as leaves, stems, roots/ rhizomes) to
increase plant biomass. A large portion of plant biomass
When vegetation is removed and the land is either
gets allocated to the roots where it decomposes very
drained or dredged for economic development, the
slowly in anaerobic conditions, thus storing the carbon
sediments become exposed to the atmosphere or water
within the sediments. Contrarily, allochthonous carbon
column resulting in the carbon stored in the sediment
is produced in one location and deposited in another.
bonding with oxygen in air to form CO2 and other
Blue carbon ecosystems exist in very hydro dynamically
greenhouse gases (GHGs) that get released into the
active settings; they are constantly battered by waves,
atmosphere and ocean. Not only such activities result in
tides, and coastal currents that transport sediments and
CO2 emissions but they also lead to losses of biodiversity
associated organic carbon from adjacent ecosystems
and critical ecosystem services.
(offshore or terrestrial) to other places. The plants found
The carbon found in the blue carbon ecosystem is in these systems have complex root structures and
categorized into two—autochthonous carbon and canopies that are efficient at trapping sediment moving
allochthonous carbon—which need to be assessed through the system, adding to the local carbon stock as
separately (Middelburg Nieuwenhuize, Lubberts, a result (Figure 1).
et al. 1997; Kennedy, Beggins, Duarte, et al. 2010).
Autochthonous carbon is produced and deposited in
the same location. Plants remove
CO2 CO2
CO2
Sequestration: Carbon fioxide in the
atmosphere and oceans is taken in by
plants during photosynthesis.
Allochthonous Carbon:
Carbon can also enter
the system from far
away, usually via runoff
up stream and/or
inundation by marine
waters.
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2003 2005 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019
Linear (Total)
Conservation Measures for other non-wood forest products. Thus, there is a need
to have appropriate management and conservation
Mangroves in India strategies for their conservation and sustainably
Mangrove ecosystems in India face continuous pressure
generating the ecosystem’s benefits along with the
due to increased human population in coastal areas and
forest products to meet the needs of the local people.
rising demand for small timber, fodder, fuelwood, and
Realizing the same, mangrove-bearing states in the
Policy Brief
4
country are implementing different measures for Morindacitrifolia, Rhizophora mucronata, Sonneratia alba,
conservation and management of the mangroves. For Avicennia alba, Bruguiera cylindrica, Heritieralittoralis,
example, some of the important techniques adopted in Phoenix paludosa, and Ceriops tagal.
Gujarat for restoring the degraded mangrove habitats
include direct seed sowing, raised bed plantations,
and fishbone channel plantation. In Andhra Pradesh, Current Status of Mangroves in
the Forest Department has formed Eco-development India as per ISFR, 2019
Committees and Van Samrakshan Samitis for joint In India, mangroves are spread over an area of 4740
implementation of projects in mangrove areas. Regular km2 which accounts for nearly 3% of the world’s total
trainings are also being conducted for sustainable mangrove vegetation. Sundarbans in West Bengal
mangrove conservation. In Maharashtra, steps have accounts for almost half of the total area under
been taken to conserve ecology and biodiversity of mangrove in the country. States-union territories (UTs)-
mangroves by protection, restoration, regeneration, wise mangrove cover as assessed by the FSI in different
and maintenance. Important species of mangrove assessments is given Table 1.
ecosystems in India include Avicennia officinalis,
are found in coastal waters of all continents except beneath seagrass meadows. These mattes accrete
Antarctica. Seagrass meadows store relatively small vertically over time, raising the seagrass meadow
amounts of carbon in aboveground biomass. However, towards the surface of the water.
belowground biomass, in the form of large long-lived
The present status of seagrass meadows in India has
root structures, stores the majority of carbon stock
been surveyed by different researchers. Area covered by
below the ground. These root structures accumulate
seagrass is represented in Table 2.
large stores of carbon through the formation of ‘mattes’
Estimates are also available for change detection in a few areas covered by seagrass. The values are represented in Table 3.
Table 3: Estimates for detection in areas covered by seagrass
Site Change Detection of Change Reasons Reference
Seagrass in Aerial Cover (ha) (ha)
Palk Bay 2922.62–2658.31 (-) 264.31 Anthropogenic pressure Shridhar, et al. (2010)
(1996–2004)
Gulf of Mannar 1856.51–1327.15 (-) 56.08 Paper shell collection Thangaradjou, et al.
(2000–2004) (2008)
Gulf of Mannar 8571.0–5710.66 (-) 2860.34 Erosion and ICMAM PD (2001);
(1998–2005) submergence of islands Susila, et al. (2012)
Lakshadweep 1139.62–1066.59 (-) 73.03 Anthropogenic pressure Nobi and
(2000–2008) Thangaradjou (2012)
Andaman 1370.4–1223.9 (-) 146.5 After Tsunami seagrass Nobi, et al. (2013)
(2004–2007) was drastically reduced
Nicobar 3192.3–1719.4 (-) 1472.9 After Tsunami seagrass Nobi, et al. (2013)
(2004–2007) was drastically reduced
Policy Brief
6
reflect the degrees of certainty or accuracy of a carbon The benefit transfer method can be used to estimate
stock inventory (or assessment): the economic values for the ecosystem services by
Tier 1: These assessments have the least accuracy. transferring available information from already done
They are certainly based on simplified studies in other locations. A lower range is used for
assumptions and published IPCC default values calculations in highly degraded or open vegetation;
for activity data and emissions factors. Tier 1 an average value is used where the vegetation is
assessments may have a large error range of moderately dense; and an upper range is used in case of
+/-50% for aboveground pools and +/-90% for highly dense vegetation cover.
variable soil carbon pools.
Tier 2: These assessments include country- or site- Measuring Blue Carbon
specific data and hence have increased A carbon stock is the total amount of organic carbon
accuracy and resolution. For example, a country (Corg) stored in a blue carbon ecosystem, typically
may know the mean carbon stock for different reported as million tonnes of organic carbon per hectare
ecosystems within the country. (million tonnes of Corg/ha) over a specified soil depth.
These stocks are determined by adding all relevant
Tier 3: These assessments require highly specific data
carbon pools within the investigated area.
of carbon stocks in each component ecosystem
or land-use area, and repeated measurements Carbon Pools: Similar to most terrestrial forest
of key carbon stocks through time to provide ecosystems, mangroves can be roughly divided
estimates of change or flux of carbon into or into four carbon pools: aboveground living biomass
out of the area. Estimates of carbon flux can be (trees, scrub trees, lianas, palms, pneumatophores),
provided through direct field measurements or aboveground dead biomass (litter, downed wood, dead
by modelling. trees, belowground living biomass (roots and rhizomes),
and soil carbon which includes the dead belowground
The IPCC recommends that countries should aspire
biomass. For seagrasses, the following three major
for Tier 3 for the measurement of key carbon stocks/
carbon pools can be considered: aboveground living
sources/sinks. However, Tier 3 assessments are costlier to
biomass (seagrass leaves and epiphytes), belowground
implement, require higher levels of technical resources
living biomass (roots and rhizomes), and soil carbon.
and capacity, and are not always possible. When Tier 2
Carbon pools that can be considered for tidal salt
or 3 estimates are not possible, Tier 1 estimates can be
marshes are aboveground living biomass (shrubs,
performed. The globally averaged estimates, as shown in
grasses, herbs, etc.), belowground living biomass (roots
the Table 4, can be used to give a Tier 1 estimate of carbon
and rhizomes), and soil organic carbon.
stocks within any given area if site-specific data do not
Need to Conserve
exist. They are based on globally averaged carbon stock
estimates for mangroves, tidal marshes, and seagrass
meadows according to the current literature. However, Coastal Ecosystems
these estimates have a high degree of uncertainty. Due to coastal development and land-use change,
mangroves, tidal salt marshes, seagrasses, coral reefs,
Table 4: Global averaged estimates
and sandy beaches and dunes are under great pressure
Ecosystem Carbon Stock Range tCO2e/ (Alongi 2002; Gedan, Silliman, and Bertness 2009;
(tonne/ha) (tonne/ha) ha Saintilan, Rogers, and Howe 2009; Waycott, Duarte,
Mangrove 386 55–1376 1415 Carruthers, et al. 2009). When vegetation is removed
and the land is either drained or dredged for economic
Tidal salt 255 16–623 935
development (e.g., mangrove forest clearing for shrimp
marsh
ponds, draining of tidal marshes for agriculture, and
Seagrass 108 10–829 396 dredging in seagrass beds – all common activities in the
Policy Brief
8
coastal zones of the world), the sediments get exposed Political awareness of the climate values of coastal
to the atmosphere or water column. This results in the wetlands and other nature-based solutions have
carbon stored in the sediment bond with the oxygen developed considerably since the first NDCs were
in the air to form CO2 and other GHGs that get released submitted. The specific motivations for the inclusion
into the atmosphere and ocean. Not only do these of coastal wetlands in the NDCs may vary between
activities result in CO2 emissions but they also result in countries and may include:
the loss of biodiversity and critical ecosystem services. High mitigation benefits: Coastal wetlands
Thus, conserving mangrove forests, coral reefs, and sequester carbon at higher rates, per unit area,
seagrasses will add to climate change mitigation efforts than terrestrial forests, storing carbon within both
globally. In May 2020, the cyclonic storm ‘Amphan’ their biomass (leaves, roots, wood, and stems) and
caused widespread damage in eastern Indian, especially
carbon-rich organic soil.
in West Bengal. The losses could have been minimized if
High adaptation benefits: Coastal wetlands provide
effective mangrove conservation measures were taken
services essential for climate change adaptation,
along the coastline.
including protection from storm surges, flooding,
A marine conservation and climate protection sea-level rise, and coastal erosion. Investment in
programme can help in achieving the Nationally these forms of ‘blue infrastructure’, such as living
Determined Contribution (NDC) targets. This is a coastlines, provides other essential ecosystem
neglected area, where adequate information is not services, such as food security, local livelihoods
available and domain knowledge is limited to some large (small-scale fisheries), and biodiversity, and is often
institutions. Marine protected areas fall under the state more cost-effective than ‘grey infrastructure’, such as
jurisdiction but may have international impacts. With seawalls and breakwaters.
the help of secondary research and stakeholder NDC progression: The Paris Agreement encourages
consultations we can propose increased conservation of countries to move towards economy-wide mitigation
key marine ecosystems to enhance carbon sequestration. targets, ultimately covering all the economic sectors
and emissions sources. The integration of land sector
Importance of Coastal emissions, including those from coastal wetlands, is
Sequestration Potential The total mapped area of seagrass is 25,378.4 ha, and
with the carbon stock as 108 tonne/ha, the total carbon
of Mangroves sequestration potential has been estimated to be 10.2
Carbon sequestration is the process through which million tonnes of CO2e.
plant life removes CO2 from the atmosphere and stores The carbon sequestration potential for the tidal salt
it as biomass. Mangrove forests play a major role in the marshes can only be calculated once the area for the
carbon cycle in removing CO2 from the atmosphere and same is documented.
storing it as carbon in plant materials. They also have
important roles in sustaining tropical and subtropical The study “Assessment for Designing REDD Plus
coastal productivity and sequester large amounts of Projects in India” was conducted by TERI in 2014. The
carbon below the ground. Mangroves are among the mangrove forests in Sundarbans (West Bengal) are
most carbon-rich forests in the tropics and their carbon valued largely for their protective functions, and there
sequestration potential is estimated to be up to 50 is relatively limited direct dependency for fuelwood
times greater than tropical terrestrial forests. India with and minor forest produce. The economic value of the
a vast coastline of about 7516.6 km, including island storm-protection services of the forest was estimated at
territories, had a mangrove cover of about 6749 km2, one-third of the total cash incomes of the households.
which is around 89% of the total coastline in India (Sahu, Damage cost avoided method was used to estimate the
Suresh, Murthy, et al. 2015). With the total estimated economic value of the storm-protection service of the
mangrove cover of 495,842 ha in 2020 (66% of the total forest, estimated to be `2,716, 389 over 3 years, or `7761
coastline of India) and the value of the carbon stock as per household (one-third of the total cash incomes of
386 tonne/ha, the total carbon sequestration potential the households). Using these data and benefit transfer
of the mangroves has been estimated as 702.42 million approach, the economic valuation can be done for the
tonne of CO2e. The potential of carbon sequestration entire mangrove cover in India. Therefore, mangroves
will increase to 748.17 million tonne of CO2e in 2030. in India can be considered as a potential site for
Upon conservation and protection of mangrove cover, implementing carbon finance projects and for trading
it has been estimated that there can be an additional carbon in the voluntary market.
sequestration potential of 207.91 million tonne
of CO2e. Figure 3 shows the trend in sequestration
potential of mangroves in India over the years.
800
600
Million tonne of CO2 e
400
200
0
2003 2005 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2020 2030
Year
The role of mangroves and other coastal ecosystems Climate Change (UNFCCC) for recognizing the carbon
has been recognized for adaptation which includes sequestered through coastal ecosystems at the national
mangrove bio-shields, protection for coastal zones, level in achieving India’s NDC targets and mitigating
and coastal zone management. The main aspect is climate change. India lacks in the mapping of seagrass
to build national capacity for the implementation of whereas tidal salt marshes are not at all surveyed. These
comprehensive coastal management through ecological two carbon pools need to be surveyed and mapped.
management, conservation and protection of critical The Government of India should also take measures
habitats, coastal geomorphology and geology of coastal to conserve the existing mangrove cover and also to
and marine areas, coastal engineering, socio-economic increase the cover which can lead to an additional
aspects, policy and legal issues, and other related fields sequestration potential of 207.91 million tonnes of
in the area of coastal governance. CO2e. Therefore, conserving blue carbon ecosystems can
maintain carbon sequestration in future and prevent
Discussions and emissions from land-use change. However, severe data
Way Forward
limitations need to be addressed if the role of blue
carbon in meeting the targets of the Paris Agreement
Blue carbon has received international attention for its has to be robustly demonstrated.
potential role in mitigating CO2 emissions. With their
value for both mitigation and adaptation, blue carbon As Sustainable Development Goal 14 (Life Below Water)
ecosystems play a vital role in any climate change outlines, the health of our ocean and coastal ecosystems
solution. The Government of India must negotiate is of fundamental importance for human well-being and
with the United Nations Framework Convention on sustainable development, while also playing a key role
Policy Brief
12
in both slowing climate warming and helping humans oil refineries, cement works, chemical plants, meat
deal with climate change impact. These ecosystems and fish processing plants, power stations, pulp and
should therefore feature prominently in the NDCs of the paper mills, supporting port facilities, and other
nations with major coastlines. manufacturing plants, should be adopted.
Monetary valuation of different ecosystem services
Recommendations of coastal ecosystems should also be considered
A stakeholder consultation was conducted under the along with carbon for obtaining finance under the
chairmanship of Mrs BV Umadevi, Additional Secretary, umbrella of carbon market mechanism.
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change.
Finance management and microfinance in particular
Other panellists present in the consultation were Dr
should be embedded in coastal community
JV Sharma, Director, Land Resources Division, TERI, Dr
management projects where coastal living
AL Ramanathan, Professor, School of Environmental
communities can be encouraged to implement the
Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, Ms Dorothee
conservation practices.
Herr, Manager, Oceans and Climate Change, IUCN
Global Marine and Polar Programme, Mr Sandeep Roy NbS need to be adopted to protect and conserve
Choudhury, Director, VNV Advisory Services, Dr Naveen coastal ecosystems.
Namboothri, Director, Dakshin Foundation, Dr Alok Involvement of private sector in financing various
Saxena, Former PCCF, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, initiatives in the blue economy should be promoted.
and Dr Priyanka, Research Associate, Land Resources
Ecosystem-based models need to be implemented
Division, TERI. The following recommendations were
for the conservation of coastal ecosystems and
made during the discussion:
mitigating climate change.
Research and development activities need to be Drivers of degradation such as tropical cyclones,
conducted to develop a methodology for carbon climate fluctuations, floods, etc., should be identified.
stock assessment of coastal ecosystems. For the There is a need to have additional technical and
mangrove areas we need a specialized methodology financial inputs as far as conserving blue carbon is
to estimate carbon stock, especially in the cases of concerned.
soil organic carbon (SOC) and belowground biomass.
Reduction in emission through adaptation and
The FSI should adopt the same for estimating SOC
carbon sequestration should be considered for
for mangrove forests.
achieving the India’s NDC target—2.5–3 billion
Beaches and sandy shore management is very tonnes of CO2e. Also, the country needs to focus on
important for the well-being of coastal ecosystems. the Blue Carbon Initiative of the International Union
Cycling of carbon through corals is a very complex for Conservation of Nature to include blue carbon in
system. Research is needed to find out whether achieving its NDC targets.
coral reefs are carbon sink or carbon source. Corals Blue Flag certification programme is one of
are currently not involved in carbon budgets but the world’s most recognized voluntary eco-
the direct or indirect role of these species and their labels awarded to beaches and marinas for their
contribution for blue carbon cannot be ignored. conservation. In order to qualify for the Blue Flag,
The Government of India should adopt Carbon a series of stringent environmental, educational,
Neutrality Policy as a mandate of additional carbon safety, and accessibility criteria need to be met and
finance for conservation of coastal ecosystems. maintained. The Ministry of Environment, Forest and
Innovative financial mechanisms for coastal Climate Change has shortlisted 12 beaches across
ecosystems such as the marine bonds, blue bonds, India for the prestigious ‘Blue Flag’ certification.
blue financing, involving industries such as shipping,
13
References Forest Survey of India. 2015. India State of Forest Report. New
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
Alongi, D.M. 2002. Present state and future of the world’s
Forest Survey of India. 2017. India State of Forest Report. New
mangrove forests. Environmental Conservation 29: 331–349
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of
Barbier, E.B., Hacker, S.D., Kennedy, C., Koch, E.W., Stier, A.C. India
and Silliman, B.R. 2011. The value of estuarine and coastal
Forest Survey of India. 2019. India State of Forest Report. New
ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81, 169–193.
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of
Beck, M.W., Heck, K.L., Able, K.W., Childers, D.L., Eggleston, D.B., India
Gillanders, B.M. et al. 2001. The identification, conservation,
Gedan, K. B., Silliman, B., and Bertness, M. 2009. Centuries
and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish
of human-driven change in salt marsh ecosystems. Marine
and invertebrates: a better understanding of the habitats
Science 1: 117–141
that serve as nurseries for marine species and the factors that
create site-specific variability in nursery quality will improve Hamilton, S. E., and Friess, D. A. 2018. Global carbon stocks and
conservation and management of these areas. Bioscience 51, potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000
633–641 to 2012. Nature Climate Change 8(3), 240-244.
Bridgham, S.D., Megonigal, J.P., Keller, J.K. et al.2006. The carbon Herr, D. and Landis, E. 2016. Coastal blue carbon ecosystems.
balance of North American wetlands. Wetlands 26, 889–916 Opportunities for Nationally Determined Contributions. Policy
Brief. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN and Washington, DC, USA: TNC
Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. and Lynch, J. C.
2003. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Hogarth, P. 1999. The Biology of Mangroves. Oxford: Oxford
Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, Article 11 University Press
Cohen-Shacham, E., Walters, G., Janzen, C. and Maginnis, S. ICMAM-PDA. 2001. Critical habitat information system for
(eds.) 2016. Nature-based Solutions to Address Global Societal Gulf of Mannar (India). – Technical Report, ICMAM project
Challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. Directorate, Department of Ocean Development, Chennai, pp.
1 – 88.
Cullen-Unsworth, L. and Unsworth, R. 2013. Seagrass meadows,
ecosystem services, and sustainability. Environment: Science Jagtap, T.G. 1996. Some quantitative aspects of structural
and Policy for Sustainable Development 55, 14–28 components of seagrass meadows from the southeast coast of
India. Botanica Marina 39: 39-45.
Das, H.S. 1996. Status of seagrass habitats of the Andamcin and
Nicobar coast. SACON technical report NO.4. Salim Ali Centre Jagtap, T.G. and Inamdar, S.N. 1991. Mapping of seagrass
for Ornithology and Natural History. Coimbatore, India, 32. meadows from Lakshadweep islands India, using aerial
photographs. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 19(2): 77-82
Desai, P.S., Narain, A., Nayak, S., Manikam B., Adiga, S., and
Nath, A.N. 1991. IRS-1A applications for coastal and marine Kathiresan, K. and Bingham, B.L. 2001. Biology of mangroves
resources. Current Science 61: 204–208 and mangrove ecosystems. Advances in Marine Biology 40:81–
251
Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J. and Caraco, N. 2005. Major role of
marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences Kennedy, H., Beggins, J., Duarte, C. M., Fourqurean, J. W.,
2: 1–8 Holmer, M., Marbà, N., and Middelburg, J. J. 2010. Seagrass
sediments as a global carbon sink: Isotopic constraints. Global
Forest Survey of India. 2003. India State of Forest Report. New
Biogeochemical Cycles 24
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
King, S.E. and Lester, J.N. 1995. The value of salt marsh as a sea
Forest Survey of India. 2005. India State of Forest Report. New
defence. Marine Pollution Bulletin 30:180–189
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.
Lo Iacono, C., Mateo, M. A. Gràcia, E. Guasch, L. Carbonell, R.,
Forest Survey of India. 2009. India State of Forest Report. New
Serrano, L., Serrano, O., and Dañobeitia, J. 2008. Very high-
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India
resolution seismo-acoustic imaging ofseagrass meadows
Forest Survey of India. 2011. India State of Forest Report. New (Mediterranean Sea): Implications for carbon sink estimates.
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India Geophysical Research Letters 35
Forest Survey of India. 2013. India State of Forest Report. New Mcleod, E., Chmura, G. L., Bouillon, S., Salm, R., Björk, M., Duarte,
Delhi: Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India C. M., and Silliman, B. R. 2011. A blueprint for blue carbon:
Policy Brief
14
toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated Saintilan, N., Rogers, K. and Howe, A. 2009. Geomorphology and
coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Frontiers in Ecology and Habitat Dynamics, pp. 58–60. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing
the Environment 9(10): 552–560
Schlesinger, W. H. and Lichter, J. 2001. Limited carbon storage
Middelburg, J., Nieuwenhuize, J., Lubberts, R., and Van de in soil and litter of experimental forest plots under increased
Plassche, O. 1997. Organic carbon isotope systematics of atmospheric CO2. Nature 411: 466–469
coastal marshes. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 45: 681–
687 Seddon, N., Sengupta, S., García-Espinosa, M., Hauler, I., Herr,
D., and Rizvi, A. R. 2019. Nature-based Solutions in Nationally
Mitsch, W. J. and Gosselink, J. G. 2007. Wetlands. New York: Determined Contributions: Synthesis and recommendations
Wiley for enhancing climate ambition and action by 2020. Gland,
Switzerland and Oxford, UK: IUCN and University of Oxford
Mumby, P.J. 2006. Connectivity of reef fish between mangroves
and coral reefs: algorithms for the design of marine reserves at Sousa, A.I., Lillebø, A.I., Risgaard-Petersen, N., Pardal, M.A. and
seascape scales. Biological Conservation, 128: 215–222 Caçador, I. 201). Denitrification: an ecosystem service provided
by salt marshes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 448: 79–92
Nayak, S., and Bahuguna, A. 2001. Application of Remote
Sensing data to monitor mangroves and other coastal Sridhar, R., Thangradjou, T., Kannan, L., and Astalakshmi S.,
vegetation of India. Indian J. Mar. Sci. 30(4): 195-213. 2010. Assessment of coastal bioresources of the Palk Bay, India,
using IRS-LISS-III data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 38: 565–575
Nobi, E.P., DIlipan E., and Thangradjou, T. 2013. Integrating
Indian Remote Sensing multi-spectral satellite and field data to Susila, S., Nobi E.P. Thangradjou, T., Sivakumar K., Anantharaman
estimate seagrass cover change in the Andaman and Nicobar P., Kannan L., and Balasubramanian, T. 2012. In situ Biomass
Islands, India. Ocean Sci. J 48(2): 183–181 Estimation of Seagrasses in the Gulf of Mannar (India) and their
Aerial Coverage Using IRS P6 LISS III Images Aquatic Plants and
Nobi, E.P. and Thangradjou, T. 2012. Evaluation of the spatial Plant Diseases: types, characteristics and management, pp. 209–
changes in sea grass cover in the lagoons of Lakshadweep 226. New York: Nova Publishers
islands, Indiausing IRS LISS II satellite images. Geocarto Int. 27
(8): 647–660 TERI. 2014. Assessment for Designing REDD Plus Projects in
India. New Delhi: TERI
Robertson, A.I. and Alongi, D.M. 1992. Tropical Mangrove
Ecosystems. Washington DC: American Geophysical Union Thangradjou, T., Sridhar, R., Senthilkumar, S., and Kannan L.
2008. Seagrass resources assessment in the Mandapam coast
Saenger, P. 2002. The value of mangroves. In Mangrove Ecology, of Gulf of Mannar biosphere reserve, India. Appl. Ecol. Environ.
Silviculture and Conservation, pp. 207–228. Berlin: Springer Res. 6(1): 139–146.
Sahu S. C., Suresh, H. S. Murthy, I. K. and Ravindranath, N. H. Waycott, M., Duarte, C. M., Carruthers, T. J., Orth, R. J., Dennison,
2015. Mangrove area assessment in India: Implications of loss W. C., Olyarnik, S., and Kendrick, G. A. 2009. Accelerating loss
of mangroves. Journal of Earth Science and Climate Change 6: of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems.
280 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(30):
12377–12381
THE ENERGY AND
RESOURCES INSTITUTE
Creating Innovative Solutions for a Sustainable Future