Reference. 1 2011
Reference. 1 2011
Reference. 1 2011
(Advisory Jurisdiction)
Present:
Justice Qazi Faez Isa, CJ
Justice Sardar Tariq Masood
Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah
Justice Yahya Afridi
Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan
Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail
Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar
Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi
Justice Musarrat Hilali
In Attendance:
ORDER
1
https://www.youtube.com/live/fnsKtf1yM78?si=Wnye57Er_IJ39zB0.
2
Notification No.SOG-III-6-309/74, dated 13 November 1974, published in the Punjab Gazette on 11
December 1974.
3
State v Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto PLD 1978 Lahore 523.
4
Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto v State, PLD 1979 Supreme Court 53, p. 61, para 9.
Reference No. 1 of 2011 3
April 20115 which formulated questions for the opinion of this Court. A
number of amici curiae were appointed, some of whom have passed away
and others we are told are indisposed. Learned Mr. Ali Ahmed Kurd, an
amicus appointed by this Court, states that he will be rendering assistance.
We are also informed that learned Mr. Makhdoom Ali Khan, another amicus
appointed by this Court, will also be rendering assistance. Notice had also
been issued to the Supreme Court Bar Association (‘SCBA’) and the late Ms.
Asma Jahangir represented SCBA; if SCBA want to be represented before
this Court they may nominate a counsel to assist us. We also appoint
learned Messrs Khalid Javed Khan, Salahuddin Ahmed and Zahid F.
Ebrahim as amici curiae. Mr. Yasser Kureshi, an academic working at
Oxford University, United Kingdom, and Ms. Reema Omer of the
International Commission of Jurists are also appointed as amici curiae.
They are appointed to particularly attend to the constitutional and legal
aspects of the matter.
5
In re: Reference No. 1 of 2011, 2011 SCMR 962.
Reference No. 1 of 2011 4
Punjab and was associated with the Presidential Reference when it was
earlier heard and is also a criminal law expert, therefore, he is also
appointed as amicus curiae to assist with the criminal law and procedure.
8. With regard to the criminal law aspects the learned amici curiae may
assist on the following:
(1) If, and when, can a murder trial be conducted by the High Court, and
to cite local and international precedents;
(2) Was the murder-trial being conducted by the High Court objected to,
and if it was, how was the objection attended to;
(3) The consequences, if any, of departing from the usual mode of trial;
(4) The admissibility or otherwise of a confessional statement of an
approver and to what extent can it be used against a co-accused;
(5) Was there any legal bias, and if so its effects; and
(6) What were the facts leading to reopening the investigation, and was it
because fresh evidence had been discovered or was it on account of
the usurper securing his position.
6
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto v State, PLD 1979 Supreme Court 741.
Reference No. 1 of 2011 5
Learned Mr. Naek has also undertaken to provide such recordings with
their transcripts by or before Friday, 5 January 2024.
Yahya Afridi, J.
Amin-ud-Din Khan, J.
Musarrat Hilali, J.
Islamabad:
12.12.2023
(M. Tauseef, Hassan K.W.)
Approved for Reporting