Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Griffith University

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Griffith University

Project Title:
“Numerical study of flow over a smooth circular cylinder
and a square cylinder at low-high Reynolds number”

Student Name:
Abstract
The drag effect is a broad term used to control flow and evaluate the economic
design of aerodynamics, automobiles, chimneys, buildings, and hydraulic structures,
among other things. Two cases are considered for the problem of steady,
incompressible two-dimensional flow: There are two types of cylinders: cylindrical and
square. The flow around the smooth cylinder and square cylinder with a characteristic
length of 25 mm, placed horizontally, perpendicular to the main flow direction, was
numerically analysed and quantified at various Reynolds numbers based on the
characteristic length and calculated free stream velocity in the range of 1<Re<1X105.
For solving the 2D governing equation for the tested model, the numerical analysis
obtained by CFD using ANSYS FLUNET with K-omega turbulence model was
considered. The current study investigated that as the Re of the flow increases,
different instability regimes are observed for both cases. The prediction of drag
coefficient, velocity contour, and pressure contour shows good agreement with
previous published numerical investigations.
1.0 Introduction
Flow separation over a bluff body is a classic fluid mechanics problem that predicts
drag and lift coefficients, wake formation, and pressure fields [1-5]. Flow around a
circular cylinder and square is critical for engineers and researchers. Furthermore,
flow over circular cylinders can be modelled in a variety of applications such as heat
exchangers, cooling towers, nuclear cooling systems, bridge piers, and subsea
pipelines [6-9]. The majority of engineering problems have a sub-critical Reynolds
number. The shedding of vortices causes boundary layer separation and flow
oscillation in the wake zone behind the cylinder at moderate and high Reynolds
numbers [10-12].
To better understand the complexities of laminar and turbulent flows around circular
cylinder and square cylinder, new techniques and definitions have been developed.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a useful tool for displaying the flow field in terms
of streamlines, contour lines, velocity vectors, and velocity profiles for various flow
conditions. CFD techniques can also be used to calculate the drag coefficient,
pressure coefficient, and forces acting on the structures. The numerical analyses in
this study were carried out using the k-omega turbulence closure model and
commercial CFD software.

2.0 Literature study


The concept of flow over bluff bodies [13-14] is imperative due to the understanding
of the mechanism boundary layer behavior [15] and separation, wake formation [16].
A collection of studies about flow over cylinder and square cylinder, such as Roshko
[17] performed a study on drag coefficient and vortex shedding. Abuhijleh [18]
accomplished the simulation of flow over cylinder with radial fins in steady state flow
regime at low Reynolds numbers. The sole parameter for this system is Reynold
number which changes in the wake dynamics [19]. Zhenquan Li et al considered the
flow over square cylinder study and compared the contours of by varying the reynold
number [20]. Pavlov et al. conducted 2D simulations of flow over a square cylinder
and estimated that the result at Re=500 does not correspond to actual 3D flows [21].
J.F. Derakhshandeh et al. gathered data from previously studied flow over a bluff body
and concluded that the raynold number is a significant parameter that affects wake
formation [27]. According to Mehmet Ishak Yuce et al, the wake region length in a
square cylinder is longer and more turbulent than in a circular cylinder [28]. Benim et
al. used the SST k-omega turbulence model with a wide range of Re to investigate
turbulent flow past circular cylinder [29]
3.0 CFD Methodology
From the Figure 1, CFD simulation is separated into three primary steps: pre-
processing (defining the fluid domain, discretization, boundary conditions, and
mathematical modelling); simulation solving (iteration setup, numerical solution of the
transport equation system), and post-processing (analysis of the results, i.e. contours
for physical terms). [22-24]

Figure 1: ANSYS Fluent application flow diagram


In the present study, the geometries of circular cylinder and square cylinder with the
flow domain created using design modeler in the ANSYS workbench [25], after
defining the geometry, the meshing is important for the solution purpose. ANSYS
FLUENT [26], a commercial finite volume based CFD solver, was used to perform the
current numerical simulation. The control volume based collocated grid system
approach is used in FLUENT to solve all the governing equations, which are partial
differential equations. The pressure-velocity coupling scheme uses SIMPLE [25-26] to
solve the governing equations. For the pressure term, the STANDARD scheme is
used, and the momentum equation is discretized using the second order upwind
scheme.
4.0 Fluid Domain
The external fluid region that surrounds the model, where the basic flow equations are
discretized and solved, is referred to as the fluid or computational domain. Domain
optimization is required to save both time and cost. Furthermore, optimization aids in
the reduction of cell count and domain error. [30-31]
4.1 Geometry

Figure 2: Geometry for the fluid domain:(a) cylinder, (b) Square

The figures 2a and 2b represent the computational domain for this study. The domain
in this study is circular and square, with a length of 50D units and a width of 10D units,
where D stands for characteristic length, and the value of D for circular cylinder
diameter and square cylinder side is 25mm. Inside the rectangle, the cylinder and
square are placed, with the centre at (15D, 5D). The flow is from left to right, with the
cylinder and square positioned at the domain's centreline.
4.2 Boundary Conditions
The figures 3a and 3b show the physical boundary conditions for the problem
configuration for cylinder and square sections, respectively.

Figure 3: Boundary conditions for the fluid domain :(a) Cylinder, (b) Square

The computational domain's left wall (A) is assigned as the inlet. At the inlet boundary
with free stream velocity, i.e., V, the velocity inlet boundary condition is assigned. The
domain's walls (B), cylinder (D), and square (D) have no slip boundary conditions for
flow at their surfaces, as well as the domain's upper and lower surfaces, i.e., u=0, v=0.
The domain's extreme right surface is designated as an outlet. The pressure-outlet
boundary condition of the Dirichlet type pressure boundary condition (p = 0) is used at
the exit boundary with the zero input value of the static gauge pressure, i.e., u/x=v/y=0.
4.3 Discretization
For accurately predicting flow physics and ensuring the numerical solution's
stability, the computational mesh used to discretize the geometry is critical. Mesh
discretization is classified into two types: structural and unstructured mesh.
Structured two-dimensional mesh: It features a quadrilateral mesh structure and
provides simplicity and efficiency while requiring less memory. The major drawback is
that it is difficult to compute a structured mesh for a complicated geometric domain,
and the number of components must be increased to produce more accurate results.
The figure 4, shows an O grid [33] is specified for the cylinder and square cylinder
zone. The unstructured two-dimensional mesh type, with a triangular mesh structure,
is commonly used for complex designs. Figure 5, shows the unstructured mesh with
a 4mm element size for both geometries.
In the current study, two cases with each design were simulated to achieve a fine
resolution of the region. The basic output mesh information for both structured and
unstructured mesh is shown in table 1.

Figure 4: Structured mesh for Circular Cylinder and Square cylinder

Cylinder geometry Square geometry


Structured Unstructured Structured Unstructured
Elements 36530 42158 35930 42042
Nodes 37069 21464 36469 21408
Average mesh quality 0.85 0.80 0.83 0.81
Skewness 0.0547 0.0631 0.06073 0.0631
Orthogonal quality 0.984 0.96 0.979 0.96
Table 1: Mesh information
Figure 5: Unstructured mesh for circular and square cylinder

The deviation skewness and orthogonality matrices are used to evaluate mesh
deviation. The orthogonal quality is close to zero and better cells have close to one
because the skewness value is low, indicating higher element quality and poor cells.
Because the skewness and orthogonal quality in table-1 vary, the result may have a
different range.
4.4 Properties of the fluid
In this work, the fluid is considered as air and its properties are density=1.164 kg/m3,
and viscosity is 1.872X10-5 kg/m-s.
4.5Assumptions
The basic assumptions used to derive the theoretical equations are
summarized as follows:
- The fluid is considered as Newtonian fluid
- steady state, incompressible flow
- two dimensional flow/geometry
- Isothermal condition
- No body forces or gravitational effect
4.6 Governing equations
The flow past a circular and square has been simulated by solving numerically the
navier stokes equations for incompressible fluid in 2-D geometry. The equations for
continuity and momentum is expressed as follows:

o Continuity: + =0;
o Momentum:
- X-momentum, +𝑢 +𝑣 =− +𝑣 +

- Y-momentum, +𝑢 +𝑣 =− +𝑣 +
The drag coefficient (Cd ) and lift coefficient (Cl )is given by
𝐹 𝐹
𝐶 = 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐶 =
1 1
2 × 𝜌 × 𝑉 × 𝐷 2×𝜌×𝑉 ×𝐷
Where Fd = drag force, Fl=Lift force, D=Characteristics length, V=velocity in m/s,
ρ=Density in kg/m3. The fluid properties like density, viscosity of the streaming are
dependent on the Reynolds number and it is Defined as Inertia force to the viscous
force
𝜌𝑉𝐷
𝑅𝑒 =
𝜇
Where, Re=Reynolds Number, ρ=Density in kg/m3, V=velocity in m/s, D=
Characteristic length mm or m, μ=Viscosity of fluid Pa-s
4.7 Turbulence model: k-ω model
When compared to the k-ε model [28,32], the model solves the transport
variable such as k turbulence kinetic energy, and ω, turbulence dissipation rate, giving
more accurate results near the wall treatment under low-high Reynolds number.

𝜕(𝜌𝑘) 𝜕 𝜌𝑢 𝑘 𝜕 𝜌𝑘 𝜕𝑘 𝜕𝑢
+ = 𝜌𝑃 − 𝛽 ∗ 𝜌𝜔𝑘 + 𝜇+𝜎 , 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑃 = 𝜏 ,
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑥 𝜔 𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑥

𝜕(𝜌𝜔) 𝜕 𝜌𝑢 𝜔 𝛼𝜔 𝜕 𝜌𝑘 𝜕𝜔 𝜌𝜎 𝜕𝑘 𝜕𝜔
+ = 𝑃 − 𝛽𝜌𝜔 + 𝜇+𝜎 +
𝜕𝑡 𝜕𝑥 𝑘 𝜕𝑥 𝜔 𝜕𝑥 𝜔 𝜕𝑥 𝜕𝑥

You might also like