WWW Ncbi NLM Nih Gov PMC Articles PMC9061263
WWW Ncbi NLM Nih Gov PMC Articles PMC9061263
WWW Ncbi NLM Nih Gov PMC Articles PMC9061263
Log in
Heliyon. 2022 Apr; 8(4): e09317. Published online 2022 Apr 22.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09317
▸ Author information ▸ Article notes ▸ Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer
Associated Data
Abstract Go to: ▸
Deep MIMO, beam‑forming, machine learning, LOS, NLOS, antenna, DNN, CDF,
GSCM, PDP, CNN, millimeter wave, THz communications, body‑centric, radio
frequency, THz DL CT, frequency, RFC, meta‑material identi몭ication, THz‑TDS,
deep learning, 6G, Satellite, arti몭icial intelligence, Beam hopping, re몭lectarray,
Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), space communications, 5G, UAV, Cellular
networks, radio access network, reinforcement learning, unmanned aerial
vehicle, Radio Frequency Identi몭ication (RFID), GPS receiver, GPS spoo몭ing,
GPS meaconing, textile, RT, Nyusim, deep neural network, RSU, channel
estimation, large intelligent surfaces, channel extrapolation and FDD.
1. Introduction Go to: ▸
In this section, the authors introduce all the applications for various antenna
design 몭ields by using ML and DL. Firstly, in [1], To increase the mean data
rate of a multi‑antenna wireless system and implement hybrid beam forming
in mmWave frequency bands, a Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithm was
used to speed up the selection process of spatial beams. RL is an area of ML
used to maximize the notion of growing reward. In [7], taking maximum
advantage of ML with previous beam training information using locations,
nearest vehicles, and sizes of the receiver were used to learn the optimal
beam pair index. For research into mmWave or massive MIMO antennas, a
dataset is needed, so in [18], the dataset for mmWave or massive MIMO
antennas has been described. In [19], authors describe a hybrid beam
forming (BF) design for the downlink of multi‑user mmWave systems, in
which the number of AEs used at the base station to achieve BF bene몭its per
user is proportional to the user's distance. A machine learning framework for
learning environment‑aware beam‑forming codebooks for large‑scale MIMO
systems was developed. In [25], authors provide an overview of millimeter
wave channel concepts as well as an explanation of how map‑based channels
are classi몭ied. In [34], a system for future body‑centric communication was
developed using off‑the‑shelf non‑wearable devices such as Wi‑Fi routers,
network interfaces, and an omnidirectional antenna. In [25], authors provide
an overview of millimeter wave channel models as well as an indication of
how map‑based channels are classi몭ied. A THz DL computing Tomography
(CT) system is presented in section [37], capable of visualizing hidden objects
using a variety of material systems. A ML model Support Vector Machine
(SVM) was used to design and optimize re몭lect arrayantennas. To simplify
feasible beam hopping (BH) in multibeam satellite systems, a Dl‑based path
was developed in [47]. A full description of the ML design, the design of
collectors and relays, and a brief description of the choice of UAV types have
been given in section [73]. A machine learning‑based hybrid framework for
propagating both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties in antenna design is
proposed in [78]. In [93], a neural network (NN) dependent delay locked loop
(DLL) is established in the GPS receiver for multipath reduction. An overview
of the applications of machine learning and deep learning to the development
of various antenna designs has been presented in this paper. The used
methods and their outcomes have been presented. A comprehensive review
of different antenna designs, the general concept of machine learning and
deep learning, and ways of electromagnetic computation are also studied in
this paper.
Machine learning and deep learning are showing wonderful results in various
applications such as UAV, THz, textile, GPS, and Satellite. Its excellent
capabilities for learning representations in real environments make it more
suitable for applications. By using machine learning, the UAV is used for many
civilian purposes and many other purposes. On the other hand, body‑centric
communication systems also use machine learning and deep learning to
increase their capabilities. A review of recent reported uses and applications
of machine learning and deep learning for various antennas has been
performed in this paper.
2.1. Machine learning and deep learning for millimeter wave for antenna
design applications
There are two parts to a hybrid beamforming architecture. One is the analog
beamformer, and the other is the digital pre‑coder. The pre‑coding weights
for the various frequency portions of the baseband signal and 몭lexibility
happen when the digital pre‑coder connects parallel streams of input
symbols to RF transmission chains. The analog beamformer connects the
transmit antennas with the output of the RF blocks. For wideband RF signals,
because of its analog characteristics, the beamformer applies the same phase
shift to each antenna [2]. The hybrid beamforming scheme can be
implemented in many ways and in [3, 4], and [5], those ways are reported. A
hybrid beamforming algorithm, which is the focus of this section, can
maximize the earnable sum data rate of a mmWave Massive MIMO system.
The weights of the analog beamformer can only belong to a set of uniformly
quantized phase shift values for this purpose, and it is done jointly by the
digital pre‑coder and the analog beamformer to be used in transmission [6].
It is assumed that for a particular analog beam former, a lower dimensional
It is assumed that for a particular analog beam former, a lower dimensional
wireless channel can be gained. Using Singular Value Decomposition (SVD), a
lower‑dimensional wireless channel's capacity to transmit digital pre‑coder
can be derived. By using a brute force search for the given channel state, the
analog beamformer can be gained. It is possible to achieve this by moderating
the number of transmitted antennas and phase shift values of each antenna.
Reinforcement Learning (RL)was used to speed up the selection of the analog
beamformer in this section. RLis mentioned based on a Machine Learning
(ML) algorithm. The ML algorithm has earned experience from previous
work and, using that experience, this RL algorithm assesses the execution of
the candidate solution in every case of the process. Brute force search and the
mentioned RL algorithm show similar sum data rates. But for the RL
algorithm, fewer iterations are required.
A wide evaluation has been introduced for the newly introduced beam
selection path. In this study, importance was given to the alignment
probability and achieved throughput matrices. The beam selection
performance has been compared with various machine learning models. The
prediction performance at various levels is then evaluated by varying the
number of vehicles in the feature. Noisy features of some realistic issues are
also discussed in the study. With no GPS error, a straightforward feature set is
encoded in Cartesian coordinates. Table 1 shows the classi몭iers utilized in this
investigation. From the table, it can be seen that the random forest got an
85.14% alignment probability, which is a better result than other classi몭iers.
With the alignment probability, the earned throughput does not scale, and
though Naı̈ve Bayes or gradient boosting have less alignment probability than
random forest, there is no main difference between their throughput. This
happens because several beams of power are almost the same. The model is
good enough to 몭ind good beams, though the accuracy is not 100%.
Table 1
Beam selection alignment probability and achieved throughput ratio with different
classi몭iers [7].
PA (%) RT (%)
Naı̈
ve‑Bayes 59.31 91.14
AdaBoost 45.80 75.05
RBF‑SVM 55.89 89.32
Gradient Boosting 69.05 96.49
Random forest 85.14 98.32
2.1.4. Millimeter wave massive multiple input multiple output for hybrid
precoding For future communications, millimeter wave massive multiple
input multiple output (MIMO) is a remarkable solution. In mmWave MIMO, to
minimize the complexity of the hardware and energy spending related to
components of mixed signal, digital pre‑coding and hybrid analog are
important methods. Present hybrid pre‑coding schemes have high
computational complexity and cannot use spatial information. In the
proposed solution, every speci몭ication of the precoders to get the most
effective use of a deep neural network, the decoder is treated as a mapping
relation (DNN). In this study, hybrid precoding and a deep learning
architecture that supports mmWave massive MIMO were applied. The
importance of this study is that it can enhance the spectrum feasibility of
mmWave massive MIMO and also minimize the bit error ratio (BER). For
those above results, the required computational complexity becomes less,
and hybrid pre‑coding gives better performance than conventional schemes.
2.1.5. Hybrid precoding for wideband millimeter wave massive MIMO systems
Millimeter wave (mmWave) massive multiple input multiple output (MIMO)
has been proposed as a viable solution for future Internet of Things (IoT)
data rates. Hybrid precoding is a viable result for mmWave large MIMO
systems without a notable sum rate loss to reduce the number of radio
frequency (RF) chains. The current study is evaluated using an unrealistic
narrowband mmWave channel basedon using hybrid precoding or, on the
other hand, the high resolution (HR) phase shifters (PSs) with huge power
other hand, the high resolution (HR) phase shifters (PSs) with huge power
waste on hybrid precoding. For practical frequency selective wideband
mmWave large multiple input multiple output systems, an energy ef몭icient
hybrid pre‑coding approach based on one bit PSs has been investigated. A
cross‑entropy optimization (CEO) based hybrid pre‑coding strategy to
optimize the earnable sum rate of the reviewed system has also been
published as the CEO algorithm for machine learning breakthroughs. In the
case of HR‑PSs in general, the suggested CEO‑dependent hybrid precoding
plot from the event with one‑bit PSs has been enlarged to show that the
solution may be used in various plots. In terms of energy feasibility and near‑
optimal sum rate, the presented systems outperform some convocational
methods.
The millimeter wave has unexplored and good spectrum resources. To ful몭ill
the high data rate, the necessity for IoTmmWave is considered. Extreme
propagation loss because of short wavelengths happens when high frequency
mmWave signals are at 30–300 GHz, and this problem can be solved by high
antenna array gain. The short wavelengths of mmWave communications are
assigned high antenna array gain [15]. A new problem could arise from the
use of a massive antenna array. In a sub‑6 GHz MIMO system, for example, a
dedicated radio frequency (RF) chain is typically required for each antenna to
implement fully digital pre‑coding [16]. For RF chains in mmWave, totally
digital pre‑coding is not sustainable [17]. A solution can be obtained from
analog pre‑coding with a RF chain, but it does not support multiplexing.
Hybrid pre‑coding has been suggested for multiplexing and sum rate of total
digital precoding. A portable‑sized digital pre‑coder is enough to work out
spatial multiplexing because of the low rank of mmWave channels. This
hybrid pre‑coding can get an almost optimal sum rate.
2.1.6. A generic deep learning dataset for massive MIMO antenna The
researchers presented the deep MIMO dataset, which is essential for any
research. They provide a dataset of mm waves or a massive MIMO antenna
design dataset. This is actually the generic dataset for mm wave‑antennas.
They also give detailed information about the structure of the generic dataset
of the massive MIMO antenna. They provide some information about the
channel's dataset design.
In the end, the learned codebook in the LOS scenario with 64 beams hits
about 90% of its upper bound, and with 128 beams, it reaches about 95% of
its upper bound. It is very important in areas where analog phase shifters'
resolution is limited. From the NLOS results, we can see that with 64 beams,
learned codebooks reach about 90% of their upper bound. These results
assure the similarity of the framework to learning beam codebooks that can
optimize the size and beam patterns.
The database used contains a large number of snapshots for training sets
used in machine learning methodologies [7, 28]. In the dataset, a DNN (deep
neural network) based beam selection algorithm is used, which is a machine
learning algorithm. Figure 2 shows that there is an overall performance
evolution of map‑based proposed models. In part 2, they used DNN‑based
beam selection algorithms and simulations of parameters. In the proposed
algorithm, CDFs (Cumulative Distribution Functions) are used, and GSCM
(Geometry‑based Stochastic Channel Model) is used in the training sets and
database.
Figure 2
To verify the model, three real scenarios are used. For the test, some furniture
was used in it. In the 몭irst scene, two participants stood 2.4 m away from the
radar and were required to repeat each of four gestures for 30 min in order
to collect 60 gesture data points. The 몭irst scenario is shown in Figure 4 (a).
Then, in the 2nd and 3rd scenes, the two participants were at the same
distance and just the placement of the chair and table was changed, as shown
in Figure 4 (b‑c).
Figure 4
Three real test sceneries of the model [2]. (a) First Scenario, (b) Second Scenario, (c)
Third Scenario.
From the output, the accuracy result was as in Table 2. The results of rotation
scenarios are almost the same and have a high degree of accuracy.
Table 2
Accuracy result of three scenarios [102].
The 몭irst three gestures' accuracy decreased greatly, and it is concluded that
the external environment affects the model the most.
2.1.13. Deep learning based antenna selection for channel extrapolation in FDD
2.1.13. Deep learning based antenna selection for channel extrapolation in FDD
massive MIMO Massive multiple‑input multiple‑output (MIMO) systems
include a large number of antennas, which makes obtaining accurate channel
state information dif몭icult, especially in the frequency division duplex mode.
As demand for data transfer rates rises, massive multiple‑input multiple‑
output (MIMO) systems have emerged as a crucial technology for the next
generation of wireless communication [107]. Massive MIMO presents a
signi몭icant issue for the base station (BS) in obtaining correct channel state
information (CSI), particularly in frequency division duplex (FDD) mode
[108]. For the FDD massive MIMO system, Yu et al. [109] designed an ef몭icient
downlink channel reconstruction approach. The distance between antenna
elements in a massive MIMO system can be narrow enough that the channels
have a signi몭icant correlation. The fundamental advantage of DL‑based
channel extrapolation is that it does not require an accurate model and may
easily combine existing antenna selection approaches [110, 111, 112, 113].
As a result, proper DL‑based antenna selection should be designed, as should
effective downlink channel extrapolation from partial uplink channels. In this
study, we used probabilistic sampling theory to characterize discrete antenna
selection as a continuous and differentiable function. For comparison, the
performance of the DL and uniform antenna selection‑based channel
extrapolation is studied. Our proposed method outperformed the DL and
uniform antenna selection‑based schemes in simulations, and it was able to
properly handle signi몭icant frequency gaps and uplink channel estimate
inaccuracies.
The frequencies of THz are used for spectroscopy in different types of areas.
The THz antenna can transmit and receive THz electromagnetic waves in the
THz system as it has some features like wide frequency, small size bandwidth,
and high rate. The THz frequency has signi몭icance in met material
identi몭ication, the 6G network, visualizing hidden objects and beam selection.
As we know, network systems are improving day by day, so 6G is the future
network technology and is 몭lexible. Met material and other hidden objects are
important as we are not able to visualize some of the objects that are hidden.
Beam selection is important as hybrid beamforming is very important for
overcoming the attenuation that is created by the extremely high frequency
in the THz band.
Figure 5
The 몭inal results of the comparison of THz CT and THz DL CT models. The
THz DL CT model may use kernel 몭ilters to recreate superior images in the
high spatial frequency area, which is useful for visualizing the interior
structure of 3D objects. As previously stated, the MSE (mean square error) of
the THz DL CT model was 1.86 percent, which is lower than the standard THz
CT model. The 몭inal result, shown in Figure 7 (a‑c), demonstrate that THz DL
CT is a model capable of visualizing concealed objects using material systems.
Figure 7
(a) Comparison between THZ CT and THz DL‑ CT. (b) Numerical metrics on two
algorithms, (c) Visible image and 3D THz images by THz DL‑CT on a testing object [37].
2.3.2. Low complexity beam selection scheme for terahertz systems When
compared to some existing beam selection schemes, a proposed beam
selection model that uses a machine learning algorithm that is an RFC
(Random Forest Algorithm) based beam selection scheme is capable of
providing a better arrangement between sum‑rate and complexity by
choosing the proper parameter settings. In this paper, it is considered that
there is a THz multi‑user uplink system featuring hybrid beamforming
architecture on both the base station and user sides. The channel
characteristics of L propagation pathways are assumed to be approximated
and known on the base station side in this model, and the channel‑related
additional content is not taken into account. There is an exhaustive search
approach for the maximum sum rate that can compute the sum rate under all
beam combinations and locate the best transmitter and receiver pair. They
also utilized the SVM model to see the results in this study, and after applying
it, it was discovered that the SVM model causes data bias, which undermines
the balance of two data sets. As a result, the RFC model's training set is
similar to the SVM model's. This paper covered the communication problems
and the machine learning approach that will help to improve the 5G
communication system as well.
Figure 8
In the end, to compare the results, they used the SVM algorithm, the human
baseline, and CNN. In the human baseline, the mean accuracy was 56.97%,
the SVM method's accuracy was 87.9%, and CNN had 100% accuracy on
every fold. These experiments were already done by SVM, but in this paper
they proved that deep learning with CNN gives better accuracy in identifying
the existence of metamaterials in mixtures.
Figure 9
As given techniques, there are some power supply issues, network security
issues, and hardware design issues. Millimeter waves and THz bands need to
be recreated again for joint use. If the issues can be overcome, then it will be
몭lexible.
2.4. Machine learning and deep learning for satellite antenna design
application
2.4.1. Acceleration of design and cross polar optimization for shaped beam
re몭lect array antennas for space applications A machine learning approach
called Support Vector Machine (SVM) was used to develop and optimize
re몭lectarray antennas in [46]. As a result, computing time is reduced without
a decrease in accuracy. The main signi몭icance of [46] is that by using SVMs,
crosspolar isolation and crosspolar discrimination can be improved, and the
computing time remains the same.
The planes should focus their transmission beams in the direction of the
satellite so that they can receive or transmit Radio Frequency (RF) signals to
or from the satellite. Antennas with omnidirectional are not good for low
gain. In [53, 54], it is mentioned that steering dish antennas mechanically is
the usual solution. This solution has drawbacks like increased drag force,
high maintenance costs, and a large dimension. In [55, 56], it is mentioned
that because of low maintenance costs, agility, and reduced drag forces, the
potential solution is the Phased Array Antenna (PAA) system. A PAA system is
developed using a beamforming network and an array of antenna elements
(AEs), as shown in Figure 11. From a speci몭ic angle, a time‑delayed version of
the aimed signal is received by every AE. With predetermined delay values,
the received signal will be delayed while it goes through RF paths. In [53], for
simpli몭ication of the tuning process to the bottommost path, the signal
arrives 몭irst. As it is discussed [57], the delay points are tuned, so that the
aimed delays can be matched while the signal passes with the help of a
beamforming network. In [57] mentioned, the delay points are tuned, so that
the aimed delays can be matched while the signal passes with the help of a
beamforming network. According to [58], the aimed signal adds up in phase
using a delay and a combination characteristic of the beamforming network.
The intended signal and its time‑delayed form are well de몭ined in [52]. An
optical beamforming network was employed in [59, 60], and [61] with optical
ring resonators (ORRs) as con몭igurable delays. The ORRs genetic method [64]
and nonlinear programming optimization [62, 63] were employed to 몭ind the
optimum parameter.
Figure 11
Antenna elements (AEs), a phased array antenna (PAA) system, and an optical
beamforming network (OBFN) are all examples of optical beamforming networks [52].
beamforming network (OBFN) are all examples of optical beamforming networks [52].
Figure 12
The right diagram is its neural network con몭iguration and in the left there is OBFN
system (4 × 1) [52].
Figure 12 shows the diagram of the neural network con몭iguration, and on the
left there is the OBFN system (4 × 1). From training examples of a neural
network, we can obtain input vectors and their corresponding aimed output.
The signal received by each antenna element is the neural network's input in
Figure 12. The aimed output is acquired via the reference path, and this is the
signal.
While talking among satellites, we must follow and precisely point the mobile
target for ground stations and terminals in satellite terrestrial networks. To
get ideal signal reception requirements, stations or terminals require
changing the pointing of satellite antennas on time while relative movement
happens between satellites. Because of high turbulence in the mobile carrier
for mobile services in the satellite terrestrial network, the elevation of the
ground mobile station and terminal, as well as the antenna azimuth, will
change rapidly. By aiming antenna beams at compatible satellites, we can
increase communication. Arti몭icial intelligence is used to evaluate the quality
of mobile communication on satellite terrestrial networks, engage with
mobile targets, and explore a new road to integrative collaboration. Multi‑
mode perception information must be considered when using different types
of sensors to detect information about moving things. Then pointing and
tracking were introduced to mobile phones. In [70], it is mentioned that to
get data from various sources and then learn to schedule tasks, optimize
allocation of resources, and train needs unsupervised learning with satellite
terrestrial networks.
2.5.1. UAV in the machine learning environment For academic and industrial
research, unmanned aerial vehicles and machine learning are key
applications. This paper's main focus is on applying machine learning and its
techniques to many 몭ields. This is a very useful application for UAVs, which
are used in the environment. The unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and
machine learning are two of the most important aspects of the fourth
industrial revolution. This was actually created to research the importance of
machine learning and the scope of use for the UAV. The UAV was actually used
because of its low altitude, high resolution, 몭lying capability, and probability.
In this application, they focus on the implementation of the UAV
environment. Finally, they proved that the UAV and machine learning both
have a huge scope for scienti몭ic research.
2.5.2. UAV based 5G radio access networks The authors explain why, how, and
which sorts of machine learning approaches are effective for constructing
UAV‑based radio access networks in this application. They concentrated on
supervised and reinforced learning systems in particular. They also discussed
radio access networks and compared them to radio access networks based on
unmanned aerial vehicles.
2.5.4. Arti몭icial intelligent for UAV enabled wireless networks The authors
provide a detailed summary of current research in the area of arti몭icial
intelligence‑enabled UAV networks in this article. They also go through some
of the current research's limitations and present some prospective concepts
that could be pursued in the near future. They also report on some of the
work done in Florida for UAV‑based networks in order to examine the
deployment of intelligence at the boundary of UAV networks. Furthermore,
they provide a thorough introduction to each arti몭icial intelligence topic
covered in this work, allowing readers from a variety of backgrounds to
comprehend it.
Smart cities and aerial base station deployment are two examples of UAV
applications that provide motivation. The researchers looked at how machine
learning techniques are utilized to improve the performance of UAV networks
in these applications. They also provide some insight into how FL techniques
are applied to UAV networks.
These antennas are designed with textile materials. These antennas are
important for developing wireless electronic textiles. It helps communicate
between garments and sensors with external devices. Wearable antennas are
몭lexible, and washable, and the following papers are focused on these.
Sensors and techniques are used to make the textile system more 몭lexible.
π: R → [0,1],∃ x ∈ R: π (x) = 1.
In this case, PDF represents the frequency of an event over a given time
interval, and PD represents the value that x is presumed to be. And 0 denotes
interval, and PD represents the value that x is presumed to be. And 0 denotes
an impossibility, whereas 1 denotes a possibility. As shown in Figure 13, PD
can be speci몭ied as rectangular or triangular. PDs are commonly used to
represent so‑called total ignorance, which occurs when no information about
a parameter's variability is known [80]. The epistemic variable in fuzzy sets
is x. It is distinguished by its cuts. Cuts are indicated by red lines in Figure 13.
Figure 13
(A) A triangular PD, π(x), and (B) the corresponding possibility Π (solid) and necessity N
(dashed) measures [78].
Figure 14
Flowchart of BO algorithm [78].
Figure 15
2.6.2. On the use of knitted antennas and inductively coupled RFID tags for
wearable applications A knitted folded dipole antenna with an inductively
connected RFID chip was designed and tested. Wireless smart gadgets are
now employed in clothing. Physiological sensors and low‑power computing
units are integrated into these garments, enabling continuous biomedical
monitoring and activity tracking [82, 83]. RFID (radio‑frequency
identi몭ication) technology uses low‑power radio waves to collect data and
automatically identify items. It has been demonstrated that the backscattered
power (RSSI) transmitted by a passive RFID tag may be employed as a metric
for identifying material deformations for typical metal‑based tags [84]. They
used knitted‑based manufacturing techniques to create comfortable and
battery‑free wearable stain sensors, just as they did in this work. Comfortable
to wear, very stretchy, with impedance matching between chip and antenna,
and appropriate radiating properties to continue communication at various
and appropriate radiating properties to continue communication at various
levels of physical deformation, are all requirements for this sensor. A
wearable stain sensor is paired with a folded dipole antenna in this device.
SVM and Gaussian 몭ilters are two machine learning techniques that are used
to evaluate data. The goal of this system was to track the movements of the
body, hence knitted antennae implanted in the host garment with inductively
connected RFID tags were constructed.
2.7. Machine learning and deep learning for global positioning system
antenna design application
3. Analysis Go to: ▸
For antenna design, machine learning has shown great results, but it also has
some issues. Choosing the perfect algorithm for any experiment is a major
challenge. Because all kinds of simulation data are not suitable for all
algorithms, an unsuitable algorithm may not be able to 몭ind the perfect result.
So datasets need to be checked 몭irst before using an algorithm. Before
starting work, we need to know very well what area of the problem we are
working on. Because valueless results can be found from wrong assumptions,
and it will be a waste of time and resources. Getting a clean dataset is very
hard, and getting an accurate result is also necessary. Several simulations
have to be done, so that proper training data can be found. Preprocessing
data is a dif몭icult task because the data needs normalization and feature
selection, and for large datasets, a huge amount of time is needed. Debugging
the algorithm for solving a problem is also an important task in the 몭ield of
machine learning.
To investigate the performance gap between the suggested design and the
traditional design, we employed Monte Carlo simulations, where the average
is derived using 100 channel realizations, and a total of 1000 symbols are
used for each channel realization. Furthermore, the desired or required BER
is set to 103 in these results. By simulating the proposed learning‑assisted
adaptation, we were able to show that it easily ful몭ills the required BER while
giving a much greater data rate than traditional link‑adaptation based on SNR
threshold values.
Locations, sizes of the receiver, and nearest vehicles were used to determine
the ideal beam pair index in [32], which took full advantage of machine
learning equipment with previous beam training information. Many levels of
situational acknowledgment are a key part of this study, and an inclusive
analogy of numerous classi몭ication schemes has been addressed. As a result,
it is stated that 86% alignment probability can be achieved, but there is
always a security concern. A lot of factors can go wrong, and that can lead to
missing vehicle locations in the feature. The noisy features are GPS
inaccuracy, location updating frequency, and penetration rate.
The auto encoder model was implemented in a MATLAB tool in this article,
and scalograms generated from Wi‑Fi signals were used for training,
validation, and testing.
An arti몭icial intelligence (AI) based pointing and tracking method for mobile
terminals and stations in satellite terrestrial networks was developed in
[108] to ensure that mobile stations and terminals experience minimal
communication interference and can access ideal antenna signals from other
stations or terminals. But there are also some limitations, and those require
supervision, cost, and maintenance. There is no one‑size‑몭its‑all solution.
Deep RL can also be used to adjust the speed of the UAV cloudlet (s)
dynamically in order to improve user performance. When the derived
solutions operate on data with different properties than the data used to
train the model, the performance of Machine learning techniques may be
reduced or unanticipated behaviors may occur. They can also obtain resource
location information more quickly and ef몭iciently using this method.
It should be noted that machine learning tools are frequently used in the
literature to solve problems that could be solved in a more simple and
deterministic manner, giving the impression that the need for machine
learning is not well justi몭ied, which could lead to machine learning
misapplication in many cases.
In this paper, they can also use machine learning algorithms and re‑
identi몭ication using the features of each target. In the future, the pattern of
the animal's skin and the shape of the animal's body can be considered.
In textile antenna design, all of the work is focused on the 몭lexibility of textile
areas. In the UQ method, some random variables are introduced, but not all
the variables are used to show the result. In cloth face technology, it is cost‑
effective as there are some hardware issues. The SBO method has not been
experimented with on other antennas.
In the simulation result of the proposed NNDL is compared to that of
traditional code phase tracking solutions such as E‑L DLL, HRC, and narrow
correlator. While the NN outperformed traditional approaches in a multipath
environment, the NNDLL was shown to be able to match the performance of
traditional code phase tracking approaches when multipath was not present.
With genuine GPS signals, the NNDLL was able to achieve nearly half the
RMSE of an E‑L DLL while being trained with simulated GPS signals. But
there are many problems with neural networks, and those are the large
amount of data needed, the lack of clean data, and the computationally
expensive nature.
Table 3
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for Millimeter Wave.
Reference Antenna Algorithm Comparison to Result
No. Used Used
Table 4
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for body centric.
for body centric.
Table 5
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for THz.
Reference Antenna Used Algorithm Compared Result
No. Used to
Table 6
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for Satellite.
Table 7
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for UAV.
Table 8
Comparison of the different machine learning techniques used in the investigated papers
for Textile.
4. Conclusion Go to: ▸
Declarations Go to: ▸
All authors listed have signi몭icantly contributed to the development and the
writing of this article.
Funding statement
This research did not receive any speci몭ic grant from funding agencies in the
public, commercial, or not‑for‑pro몭it sectors.
Additional information
Acknowledgements Go to: ▸
The authors of this research would like to express their gratitude to North
South University's Electrical and Computer Engineering Department.
References Go to: ▸
1. Lizarraga E.M., Maggio G.N., Dowhuszko A.A. 2019 XVIII Workshop on Information
Processing and Control (RPIC) IEEE; 2019, September. Hybrid beamforming algorithm
using reinforcement learning for millimeter wave wireless systems; pp. 253–258. [Google
Scholar]
3. Chen C. An iterative hybrid transceiver design algorithm for millimeter wave MIMO
systems. IEEE Wireless Commun. Letters. June 2015;4(3):285–288. [Google Scholar]
4. Ayach O., Rajagopal S., Abu‑Surra S., Pi Z., Heath R. Spatially sparse precoding in
millimeter wave MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. Mar. 2014;13(3):1499–
1513. [Google Scholar]
5. Moghadam N., Fodor G., Bengtsson M., Love D. On the energy ef몭iciency of MIMO hybrid
beamforming for millimeter‑wave systems with nonlinear power ampli몭iers. IEEE Trans.
Wireless Commun. Nov. 2018;17(11):7208–7221. [Google Scholar]
7. Wang Y., Klautau A., Ribero M., Narasimha M., Heath R.W. 2018 IEEE Globecom
Workshops (GC Wkshps) IEEE; 2018, December. Mmwave vehicular beam training with
situational awareness by machine learning; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
8. Ma W., Qi C., Li G.Y. Machine learning for beam alignment in millimeter wave massive
MIMO. IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. 2020;9(6):875–878. [Google Scholar]
9. Alkhateeb A., El Ayach O., Leus G., Heath R.W. Channel estimation and hybrid precoding
for millimeter wave cellular systems. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. Oct. 2014;8(5):831–
846. [Google Scholar]
10. Xiao Z., He T., Xia P., Xia X.‑G. Hierarchical codebook design for beamforming training
in millimeter‑wave communication. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. May
2016;15(5):3380–3392. [Google Scholar]
11. Xiao Z., Dong H., Bai L., Xia P., Xia X.‑G. Enhanced channel estimation and codebook
design for millimeter‑wave communication. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. Oct.
2018;67(10):9393–9405. [Google Scholar]
12. Huang H., Song Y., Yang J., Gui G., Adachi F. Deep‑learning‑based millimeter‑wave
massive MIMO for hybrid precoding. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019;68(3):3027–3032.
[Google Scholar]
13. Ghosh A., et al. Millimeter‑wave enhanced local area systems: a highdata‑rate
approach for future wireless networks. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. Jun. 2014;32(6):1152–
1163. [Google Scholar]
14. Mir T., Siddiqi M.Z., Mir U., Mackenzie R., Hao M. Machine learning inspired hybrid
precodingfor wideband millimeter‑wave massive MIMO systems. IEEE Access.
2019;7:62852–62864. [Google Scholar]
15. Alkhateeb A., Leus G., Heath R.W. Limited feedback hybrid precoding for multi‑user
millimeter wave systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. Nov. 2015;14(11):6481–6494.
[Google Scholar]
16. Han S., I. C.‑I., Xu Z., Rowell C. Large‑scale antenna systems with hybrid analog and
digital beamforming for millimeter wave 5G. IEEE Commun. Mag. Jan. 2015;53(1):186–
194. [Google Scholar]
17. Gao X., Dai L., Han S., Chih‑Lin I., Heath R.W. Energy‑ef몭icient hybrid analog and digital
precoding for MmWave MIMO systems with large antenna arrays. IEEE J. Sel. Area.
Commun. Apr. 2016;34(4):998–1009. [Google Scholar]
18. Alkhateeb A. 2019. DeepMIMO: A Generic Deep Learning Dataset for Millimeter Wave
and Massive MIMO Applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.06435. [Google Scholar]
19. Satyanarayana K., El‑Hajjar M., Mourad A.A., Hanzo L. Multi‑user hybrid beamforming
relying on learning‑aided link‑adaptation for mmWave systems. IEEE Access.
2019;7:23197–23209. [Google Scholar]
20. Zhang Y., Alrabeiah M., Alkhateeb A. 2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal
Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) IEEE; 2020, May. Learning
beam codebooks with neural networks: towards environment‑aware mmWave MIMO; pp.
1–5. [Google Scholar]
21. Love D., Heath R., Lau V., Gesbert D., Rao B., Andrews M. An overview of limited
feedback in wireless communication systems. IEEE J. Sel. Area. Commun. Oct.
2008;26(8):1341–1365. [Google Scholar]
22. Alkhateeb A., El Ayach O., Leus G., Heath R. Channel estimation and hybrid precoding
for millimeter wave cellular systems. IEEE J. Selected Topics Signal Proc. Oct.
2014;8(5):831–846. [Google Scholar]
23. Hur S., Kim T., Love D., Krogmeier J., Thomas T., Ghosh A. Millimeter wave
beamforming for wireless backhaul and access in small cell networks. IEEE Trans.
beamforming for wireless backhaul and access in small cell networks. IEEE Trans.
Commun. Oct. 2013;61(10):4391–4403. [Google Scholar]
24. Mo J., Ng B.L., Chang S., Huang P., Kulkarni M.N., Alammouri A., Zhang J.C., Lee J., Choi
W. Beam codebook design for 5g mmwave terminals. IEEE Access. 2019;7:98387–98404.
[Google Scholar]
25. Lim Y.G., Cho Y.J., Sim M.S., Kim Y., Chae C.B., Valenzuela R.A. Map‑based millimeter‑
wave channel models: an overview, data for B5G evaluation and machine learning. IEEE
Wireless Commun. 2020;27(4):54–62. [Google Scholar]
26. Lim Y.‑G., et al. Waveform multiplexing for new radio: numerology management and
3D evaluation. IEEE Wireless Commun. Mag. Oct. 2018;25(5):86–94. [Google Scholar]
27. ICT‑317669 METIS Project Deliverable D1.4 v.3, METIS Channel Models. June 2015.
[Google Scholar]
28. Seidel S.Y., Rappaport T.S. Site‑speci몭ic propagation prediction for wireless in‑building
personal communication system design. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 1994;43(4 Nov):879–
891. [Google Scholar]
29. Scalabrin M., Bielsa G., Loch A., Rossi M., Widmer J. Machine learning based network
analysis using millimeter‑wave narrow‑band energy traces. IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput.
2019;19(5):1138–1155. [Google Scholar]
30. GONGFA LI1,3, (Member, IEEE), HAO WU1, GUOZHANG JIANG2, 4, SHUANG XU1, 4
AND HONGHAI LIU5, 6, (Senior Member, IEEE), ”Dynamic gesture recognition in the
Internet of Things”, , IEEE Access
31. Naosekpam Veronica, Sharma Rupam Kumar. Machine learning in 3D space gesture
recognition. JurnalKejuruteraan. 2019;31(2):243–248. [Google Scholar]
32. Saeed N., Loukil M.H., Sarieddeen H., Al‑Naffouri T.Y., Alouini M.S. 2020. Body‑Centric
Terahertz Networks: Prospects and Challenges. [Google Scholar]
33. Vidhya S.S., Devi S.R., Shanthi K.G. Human muscle mass measurement through passive
몭lexible UWB‑myogram antenna sensor to diagnose sarcopenia. Microprocess. Microsyst.
2020;79:103284. [Google Scholar]
34. Aziz Shah S., Ahmad J., Tahir A., Ahmed F., Russel G., Shah S.Y.…Abbasi Q.H. Privacy‑
preserving non‑wearable occupancy monitoring system exploiting Wi‑Fi imaging for
next‑generation body centric communication. Micromachines. 2020;11(4):379. [PMC free
article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Khan A.N., Ihalage A.A., Ma Y., Liu B., Liu Y., Hao Y. Deep learning framework for
subject‑independent emotion detection using wireless signals. PLoS One. 2021;16(2)
[PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36. Hall P.S., Hao Y. 2006 First European Conference on Antennas and Propagation. IEEE;
2006, November. Antennas and propagation for body centric communications; pp. 1–7.
[Google Scholar]
37. Hung Y.C., Yang S.H. 2019 44th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and
Terahertz Waves (IRMMW‑THz) IEEE; 2019, September. Terahertz deep learning
computed tomography; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
38. Ma X., Chen Z., Li Z., Chen W., Liu K. 2019 IEEE International Conference on
Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops) IEEE; 2019, May. Low complexity beam
selection scheme for terahertz systems: a machine learning approach; pp. 1–6. [Google
Scholar]
39. Liu F., Zhang W., Sun Y., Liu J., Miao J., He F., Wu X. Secure deep learning for intelligent
terahertz metamaterial identi몭ication. Sensors. 2020;20(19):5673. [PMC free article]
[PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40. Yang P., Xiao Y., Xiao M., Li S. 6G wireless communications: vision and potential
techniques. IEEE Network. 2019;33(4):70–75. [Google Scholar]
41. Sarieddeen H., Saeed N., Al‑Naffouri T.Y., Alouini M.S. Next generation terahertz
communications: a rendezvous of sensing, imaging, and localization. IEEE Commun. Mag.
2020;58(5):69–75. [Google Scholar]
42. Sengupta K., Nagatsuma T., Mittleman D.M. Terahertz integrated electronic and hybrid
electronic‑photonic systems. Nature Electronics. 2018;1(12):622. [Google Scholar]
43. Jornet J.M., Akyildiz I.F. Channel modeling and capacity analysis for electromagnetic
wireless nanonetworks in the terahertz band. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. Oct.
2011;10(10):3211–3221. [Google Scholar]
44. Rappaport T.S., et al. Wireless communications and applications above 100 GHz:
opportunities and challenges for 6G and beyond. IEEE Access. 2019;7:78. 729–757.
[Google Scholar]
45. Jepsen P.U., Cooke D.G., Koch M. Terahertz spectroscopy and imaging — modern
techniques and applications. Laser Photon. Rev. 2011;5(1):124–166. [Google Scholar]
47. Lei L., Lagunas E., Yuan Y., Kibria M.G., Chatzinotas S., Ottersten B. 2020 IEEE 91st
Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020‑Spring. IEEE; 2020, May. Deep learning for
beam hopping in multibeam satellite systems; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
48. Freedman A., Rainish D., Gat Y. Ka and Broadband Communication Conference, Bologna,
Italy. Oct. 2015. Beam hopping: how to make it possible. [Google Scholar]
49. Lei J., Vazquez‑Castro M. Proc. IEEE ICC. 2011. Multibeam satellite frequency/time
duality study and capacity optimization. [Google Scholar]
50. Alegre‑Godoy R., Alagha N., Vazquez‑Castro M. Proc. IEEE ICC. Jun. 2012. Offered
capacity optimization mechanisms for multibeam satellite systems. [Google Scholar]
52. Nugroho H., Wibowo W.K., Annisa A.R., Rosalinda H.M. Deep learning for tuning
optical beamforming networks. TELKOMNIKA Telecommun. Comput. Electr. Control.
2018;16(4):1607–1615. [Google Scholar]
56. Hansen R.C. John Wiley & Sons; 2009. Phased Array Antennas; p. 213. [Google
Scholar]
57. Meijerink A., Roeloffzen C., Zhuang L., Marpaung D., Heideman R., Borreman A., van
Etten W. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Communications and Vehicular Technology.
Liege; Belgium: 2006. Phased array antenna steering using a ring resonator‑based optical
beam forming network; pp. 7–12. [Google Scholar]
58. Meijerink A., Roeloffzen C., Meijerink R., Zhuang L., Marpaung D., Bentum M., Burla M.,
Verpoorte J., Jorna P., Hulzinga A., van Etten W. Novel ring resonator based integrated
photonic beamformer for broadband phased array receive antennas ‑ Part I: design and
performance analysis. J. Lightwave Technol. 2010;28(1):3–18. [Google Scholar]
59. Lenz G., Eggleton B., Madsen C.K., Slusher R. Optical delay lines based on optical
몭ilters. IEEE J. Quant. Electron. 2001;37(4):525–532. [Google Scholar]
60. Zhuang L., Roeloffzen C.G., Van Etten W. Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on
Communications and Vehicular Technology, Twente, The Netherlands. November 2005.
Continuously tunable optical delay line; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
Continuously tunable optical delay line; p. 23. [Google Scholar]
62. Bazaraa M.S., Sherali H.D., Shetty C.M. John Wiley & Sons; 2013. Nonlinear
Programming: Theory and Algorithms. [Google Scholar]
63. Boot J.C., et al. North. Holland Publishing Company; Amsterdam: 1964. Quadratic
Programming: Algorithms, Anomalies, Applications, Ser. Studies in Mathematical and
Managerial Economics. [Google Scholar]
64. Garcı́
aGarcı́
a A., et al. University of Twente; Enschede: February 2009. Optical Phase
Synchronization in Coherent Optical Beamformers for Phased Array Receive Antennas.
Master’s thesis. [Google Scholar]
65. Liu Q., Yang J., Zhuang C., Barnawi A., Alzahrani B.A. Arti몭icial intelligence based
mobile tracking and antenna pointing in satellite‑terrestrial network. IEEE Access.
2019;7:177497–177503. [Google Scholar]
66. Hu M., Liu W., Peng K., Ma X., Cheng W., Liu J., Li B. Joint routing and scheduling for
vehicle‑assisted multidrone surveillance. IEEE Internet Things J. Apr. 2019;6(2):1781–
1790. [Google Scholar]
67. Hu M., Liu W., Lu J., Fu R., Peng K., Ma X., Liu J. On the joint design of routing and
scheduling for vehicle‑assisted multi‑UAV inspection. Future Generat. Comput. Syst. May
2019;94:214–223. [Google Scholar]
68. Mbyamm K.M.J., Wang L., Varus M.L. DSTP‑end to end based approach to optimize
data transmission for satellite communications. Proc. Int. Conf. Netw. Inf. Syst. Comput.,
Apr. 2016:67–70. [Google Scholar]
69. Li X., Huang X., Mathisen S., Letizia R., Paoloni C. Design of 71‑76 GHz double‑
corrugated waveguide traveling‑wave tube for satellite downlink. IEEE Trans. Electron.
Dev. Jun. 2018;65(6):2195–2200. [Google Scholar]
70. Chen M., Hao Y., Lai C., Wu D., Li Y., Hwang K. Opportunistic task scheduling over co‑
located clouds in mobile environment. IEEE Trans. Services Comput. May
2018;11(3):549–561. [Google Scholar]
72. Khan A.I., Al‑Mulla Y. Unmanned aerial vehicle in the machine learning environment.
Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019;160:46–53. [Google Scholar]
73. Kouhdaragh V., Verde F., Gelli G., Abouei J. On the application of machine learning to
the design of UAV‑based 5G radio access networks. Electronics. 2020;9(4):689. [Google
Scholar]
74. Won D., Park M.W., Chi S. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering
and Engineering Management (IEEM) IEEE; 2018, December. Construction resource
localization based on UAV‑RFID platform using machine learning algorithm; pp. 1086–
1090. [Google Scholar]
75. Lahmeri M.A., Kishk M.A., Alouini M.S. 2020. Arti몭icial Intelligence for UAV‑Enabled
Wireless Networks: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.11522. [Google Scholar]
76. Zhou X., Kono Y., Win A., Matsui T., Tanaka T.S. Predicting within‑몭ield variability in
grain yield and protein content of winter wheat using UAV‑based multispectral imagery
and machine learning approaches. Plant Prod. Sci. 2020:1–15. [Google Scholar]
77. Shao W., Kawakami R., Yoshihashi R., You S., Kawase H., Naemura T. Cattle detection
and counting in UAV images based on convolutional neural networks. Int. J. Rem. Sens.
2020;41(1):31–52. [Google Scholar]
78. Kan D., De Ridder S., Spina D., Couckuyt I., Grassi F., Dhaene T.…Ginste D.V. 2020 14th
European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) IEEE; 2020, March. Machine
learning‑based hybrid random‑fuzzy modeling framework for antenna design; pp. 1–5.
[Google Scholar]
79. Kan D., Spina D., De Ridder S., Grassi F., Rogier H., VandeGinste D. IEEE Antennas and
Wireless Propagation Letters, Early Access. 2019. A machine‑learning based epistemic
modeling framework for textile antenna design. [Google Scholar]
81. Patron D., Mongan W., Kurzweg T.P., Fontecchio A., Dion G., Anday E.K., Dandekar K.R.
On the use of knitted antennas and inductively coupled RFID tags for wearable
applications. IEEE Transact. Biomed. Circ. Syst. 2016;10(6):1047–1057. [PubMed] [Google
Scholar]
84. Occhiuzzi C., Paggi C., Marrocco G. Passive RFID strain‑sensor based on meander‑line
antennas. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag. 2011;59(12):4836–4840. [Google Scholar]
85. He H., Chen X., Mehmood A., Raivio L., Huttunen H., Raumonen P., Virkki J. ClothFace: a
batteryless RFID‑based textile platform for handwriting recognition. Sensors.
2020;20(17):4878. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86. Harrison C., Tan D., Morris D. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors
in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, USA. 10–15 April 2010. Skinput: Appropriating the
body as an input surface; pp. 453–462. [Google Scholar]
87. Laput G., Xiao R., Chen X.A., Hudson S.E., Harrison C. Proceedings of the 27th Annual
ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Honolulu, HI, USA. 5–8
October 2014. Skin buttons: cheap, small, low‑powered and clickable 몭ixed‑icon laser
projectors; pp. 389–394. [Google Scholar]
88. Lin S.Y., Su C.H., Cheng K.Y., Liang R.H., Kuo T.H., Chen B.Y. Proceedings of the 24th
Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Santa Barbara, CA,
USA. 16–19 October 2014. Pub‑point upon body: exploring eyes‑free interaction and
methods on an arm; pp. 481–488. [Google Scholar]
89. Hamdan N., Kosuru R.K., Corsten C., Borchers J. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM
International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces, Brighton, UK. 17–20 October
2017. Run & Tap: investigation of on‑body tapping for runner; pp. 280–286. [Google
Scholar]
90. Weigel M., Nittala A.S., Olwal A., Steimle J. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on
Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA. 6–11 May 2017. SkinMarks:
Enabling interactions on body landmarks using conformal skin electronics; pp. 3095–
3105. [Google Scholar]
91. He H., Chen X., Raivio L., Huttunen H., Virkki J. Proceedings of the 2020 14th European
Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), Copenhagen, Denmark. 15–20 March
2020. Passive RFID‑based textile touchpad. [Google Scholar]
92. Couckuyt I., Declercq F., Dhaene T., Rogier H., Knockaert L. Surrogate‑based in몭ill
optimization applied to electromagnetic problems. Int. J. RF Microw. Computer‑Aided Eng.
2010;20(5):492–501. [Google Scholar]
93. Orabi M., Khalife J., Abdallah A.A., Kassas Z.M., Saab S.S. 2020 IEEE/ION Position,
Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS) IEEE; 2020, April. A machine learning
approach for GPS code phase estimation in multipath environments; pp. 1224–1229.
[Google Scholar]
94. Sokhandan N., Ziedan N., Broumandan A., Lachapelle G. Context aware adaptive
multipath compensation based on channel pattern recognition for gnss receivers,”
NAVIGATION. J. Inst. Navig. September 2017;70(5):944–962. [Google Scholar]
95. Manesh M.R., Kenney J., Hu W.C., Devabhaktuni V.K., Kaabouch N. 2019 16th IEEE
Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC) IEEE; 2019, January.
Detection of GPS spoo몭ing attacks on unmanned aerial systems; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
96. Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard. fourth
ed. U.S. Department of Defense; Sep. 2008. [Google Scholar]
97. RiahiManesh M., Mullins M., Foerster K., Kaabouch N. IEEE Aerospace Conference.
2018. A preliminary effort toward investigating the impacts of ADS‑B message injection
attack. [Google Scholar]
99. Panice G., Luongo Salvatore, Gigante Gabriella, Pascarella Domenico, Di Benedetto
Carlo, Vozella Angela, Pescapè
A. A SVM‑based detection approach for GPS spoo몭ing
attacks to UAV. IEEE Int. Conf. Automat. Comput. (ICAC) 2017:1–11. [Google Scholar]
102. Liu Y., Wang Y., Liu H., Zhou A., Liu J., Yang N. International Conference on Green,
Pervasive, and Cloud Computing. Springer; Cham: 2020, November. Long‑range gesture
recognition using millimeter wave radar; pp. 30–44. [Google Scholar]
103. Elbir A.M., Papazafeiropoulos A., Kourtessis P., Chatzinotas S. Deep channel learning
for large intelligent surfaces aided mm‑wave massive MIMO systems. IEEE Wireless
Communications Letters. 2020;9(9):1447–1451. [Google Scholar]
104. Dong P., Zhang H., Li G.Y., Gaspar I.S., Naderi Alizadeh N. Deep CNN‑based channel
estimation for mmWave massive MIMO systems. IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process. Sep.
2019;13(5):989–1000. [Google Scholar]
105. Huang H., Yang J., Huang H., Song Y., Gui G. Deep learning for super‑resolution
channel estimation and DOA estimation based massive MIMO system. IEEE Trans. Veh.
Technol. Sept 2018;67(9):8549–8560. [Google Scholar]
106. Yang Y., Zhang S., Gao F., Xu C., Ma J., Dobre O.A. 2020 International Conference on
Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) 2020. Deep learning based
antenna selection for channel extrapolation in FDD massive MIMO. [Google Scholar]
107. Rusek F., Persson D., Lau B.K., Larsson E.G., Marzetta T.L., Edfors O., Tufvesson F.
Scaling up MIMO: opportunities and challenges with very large arrays. IEEE Signal
Process. Mag. Jan. 2013;30(1):40–60. [Google Scholar]
108. Noh S., Zoltowski M.D., Love D.J. Training sequence design for feedback assisted
hybrid beamforming in massive MIMO systems. IEEE Trans. Commun. Jan.
2016;64(1):187–200. [Google Scholar]
109. Han Y., Hsu T., Wen C., Wong K., Jin S. Ef몭icient downlink channel reconstruction for
FDD multi‑antenna systems. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. Jun. 2019;18(6):3161–3176.
[Google Scholar]
110. Wen C., Shih W., Jin S. Deep learning for massive MIMO CSI feedback. IEEE Wireless
Commun. Lett. Oct. 2018;7(5):748–751. [Google Scholar]
111. Alrabeiah M., Alkhateeb A. Proc.53rd Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and
Computers, Paci몭ic Grove, CA, USA. Nov. 2019. Deep learning for TDD and FDD massive
MIMO: mapping channels in space and frequency; pp. 1465–1470. [Google Scholar]
112. Yang Y., Gao F., Li G.Y., Jian M. Deep learning‑based down link channel prediction for
FDD massive MIMO system. IEEE Commun. Lett. Nov. 2019;23(11):1994–1998. [Google
Scholar]
113. Choi H., Choi J. Downlink extrapolation for FDD multiple antenna systems through
neural network using extracted uplink path gains. IEEE Access. Apr. 2020;8:67100–
67111. [Google Scholar]
114. Klautau A., Batista P., Gonzalez‑Prelcic N., Wang Y., Heath R.W. 2018 Information
Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA) 2018. 5G MIMO data for machine learning:
application to beam‑selection using deep learning. Published. [Google Scholar]
116. Jaeckel S., Raschkowski L., Bo ¨rner K., Thiele L. QuaDRiGa: a 3‑ d multi‑cell channel
model with time evolution for enabling virtual 몭ield trials. IEEE Trans. Antenn. Propag.
June 2014;62(6):3242–3256. [Google Scholar]
FOLLOW NCBI
Connect with NLM
Web Policies
FOIA
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure
Help
Accessibility
Careers