Brief Introduction: Levy Whether Constitutionally Valid?
Brief Introduction: Levy Whether Constitutionally Valid?
Brief Introduction: Levy Whether Constitutionally Valid?
BRIEF INTRODUCTION
Tax on services has been in vogue in India since 1994 when it was introduced for the first time. When it was introduced initially there were three services which were liable but over the years various other services have been added and today more than a hundred services are liable under service tax. The basket of services liable to service tax is only expected to grow in the near future as the service sectors contribution to the countries GDP is expected to increase even further though possibly most of the services which can be comprehended are already being taxed. Here, a negative list would make more sense to avoid uncertainty caused by frequent changes. One of the main reasons for the services to be taxed is the fact that the manufacturing sector can be taxed only to a certain extent if we are to ensure the competitiveness of our industry, since ours is no longer a closed economy, all activities are to bear the burden. Services presently forming more than 55 % of the GDP are expected to reach 70% in the next decade, which should also bear the burden of tax. This tax would be subsumed into the Goods and Service Tax which may be in place in the next few years.
One thing which is yet to be resolved is the validity of service tax levy on rental of immovable property though the Delhi High Court has admitted a writ petition in Home Solution Retail India Ltd Vs UOI . Challenge the levy of service tax on pure renting of immovable property without there being a service associated with the renting of immovable property.
The person who pays or is liable to pay freight for the taxable services provided by a Goods Transport Agency for transport of goods by road, is liable to pay Service Tax, if the consignor or consignee falls under any of the seven categories viz. (a) a factory (b) a company (c) a corporation (d) a society (e) a cooperative society (f) a registered dealer of excisable goods (g) a body corporate or a partnership firm.
The taxable services provided by Mutual Fund Distributors in relation to distribution of Mutual Fund. In this regard, Service
Tax is to be paid by the Mutual Fund or the Asset Management Company receiving such service.
In case the service provided by a person falls within the scope of the taxable services and if such service is not fully exempted, the service tax is payable on the value of the taxable service received subject to the eligible abatements, if any. Service tax is payable on Gross Amount charged for taxable service provided or to be provided [Section 67]. If consideration is partly not in money, valuation is required to be done as per Valuation Rules. Tax is payable even when advance is received.
Governing provisions
The provisions pertaining to service tax are given in Chapter V and VA of Finance Act 1994 as amended from time to time. The Central Government has also been empowered to make rules to carry out the provisions of this Chapter, through section 94 of this chapter. This comes along with the power to grant exemptions from Service Tax u/s 93. The Government has consequently notified various sets of rules, the provisions of which have been explained as we proceed with this book. The rules which may be Noted are as follows. Service Tax Rules 1994 Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 Export of Service Rules 2005 Service Tax (Registration of Special Category of Persons) Rules 2005
Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules 2006 Taxation of Services (Provided from outside India and received in India) Rules2006 Works Contract (Composition Scheme for Payment of Service Tax) Rules 2007
service, the services provided before the date on which such services were brought under the tax net, would not be subjected to service tax.
Concept of Classification
The service provider should ensure that he classifies the concerned service properly as this would enable him to ascertain his liability correctly. Correct classification is critical as the exemptions under service tax barring the general exemptions are based on specified categories and if the classification is wrong, the service provider may either end up paying more than required or even face a liability. For the purposes of classification, the category which gives the most specific description of the service should be adopted. Where composite services (involving combination of different services and to be distinguished from composite contracts involving both transfer of property in goods as well as provision of taxable services) are provided, the classification should be on the basis of the service which gives them their essential character. Where the aforesaid two principles cannot be followed for classification, the classification shall be under the subclause which occurs first among the sub-clauses which equally merit consideration as per section 65A. In addition to this, the non statutory principles as to consideration of trade parlance especially where certain .terms. are not defined under law would also assume significance as indicated in CC General (New Delhi) Vs Gujarat Perstorp Electronics.
Registration
Every person liable to pay service tax is required to register himself by making an application to SCE as per section 69. The service provider before registering himself shall ensure that he has crossed the exemption limit of registration for the small service provider which is Rs. 10 lakhs, specified by notification 6/2005 ST dated 01.03.05 as amended from time to time. Branded service providers i.e. providing services under brand name or trade name of others, would not be admissible for the exemption. An illustration could be the commercial coaching franchisees. The exemption from registration would not be available for a person who is liable to pay service tax as receiver of services. Moreover, the aggregate value of taxable services provided in the preceding financial year should not exceed Rs. 10 lakhs in order to avail the benefit of this exemption. As per Rule 4 of Service Tax Rules 1994, an application in Form ST 1 would have to be filed within thirty days from the date on which the taxable
service is provided/tax is levied on such service. The assessee would also have the option of going in for centralized registration where the accounting and billing activities are centralized. A change in the information or any additional information sought to be given shall be intimated in writing to the jurisdictional Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise or Deputy Commissioner of Central Excise. There is a penalty of Rs. 200 per day or 5000/- whichever is higher for delay in registration.
Generally it is the service provider who provides the taxable services who is called upon to collect service tax from his customer/client and pay the same to the government. Goods Transport Agency service. Specified person paying the freight
Business auxiliary service of distribution of mutual fund by a mutual fund distributor or agent . Mutual fund or asset Management Company receiving such service Sponsorship service provided to any body corporate/firm in which case, the body corporate or firm receiving such sponsorship service would be liable Taxable services received by any person in India from abroad . the recipient of such service in India. Insurance auxiliary service by an insurance agent. Person carrying the general insurance business or life insurance business
Payment of Interest
Section 75 of Chapter V of Finance Act 1994 as amended from time to time provides for payment of interest by the assessee where there is short payment or delay in payment of service tax. The present notified rate is 13% p.a. simple interest as per Notification 26/2004 ST dated 10.09.04 and this should be paid along with the tax. The interest shall be for the period of default.
Export of Services
The service provider who exports his service in accordance with the Export of Service Rules 2005 would not have to pay service tax on such exports. He would also have the option of going in for the rebate of service tax paid on taxable service exported or service tax paid on input services or excise duty paid on inputs used in providing such taxable services exported in accordance with Rule 5 of Export of Service Rules 2005 and the notifications specified there under. Another option would be that of refund in accordance with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004.
Filing of returns
The service provider is required to submit half-yearly returns in Form ST-3 or Form ST- 3A (as the case may be) with relevant copies of Form GAR 7, in triplicate by the 25th day of the month following the end of the relevant half-year as per Rule 7 of Service Tax Rules 1994. Form ST-3A is to be used where a deposit is to be made provisionally . The returns are to be filed for the half year ending 30th September and for the half year ending
on 31st March. Where the assessee makes a mistake in the return, the revised return in Form ST 3 should be submitted within ninety days from the date of submission of the return under Rule 7. Where the filing of the return is delayed, the service provider would have to pay a sum to the credit of the central government as follows under Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules 1994 Rs. 500 for a delay of 15 days from the prescribed date Rs. 1000 where the delay is between 15 and 30 days from the prescribed date Rs. 1000+ Rs. 100 per day of delay where the delay is beyond 30 days from the prescribed date but not exceeding Rs. 2000 in terms of Section 70. For 1st April to 30th September Due Date - 25th October For 1st October to 31st March Due Date - 25th April
Assessment
The assessee is required to assess the tax payable by him and pay the same on monthly or quarterly basis as applicable. In other words, what is envisaged here is self assessment. Rule 6(4) of Service Tax Rules 1994 enables him to opt for payment on provisional basis where there is difficulty in ascertaining the amount to be paid. For this, he shall make an application to ACCE/DCCE. The assessment would be finalized at a later date. The departmental authorities can call for further information as they may require from time to time. The provisions of Central Excise Rules
would apply here in relation to such provisional assessment with the exception as to requirement of furnishing of bond.
Provisions as to recovery
As per section 73 of Chapter V of Finance Act 1994 as amended, where the service tax has not been levied or paid or has been short-levied or short-paid or erroneously refunded, the Central Excise Officer handling service tax can serve a Show Cause Notice on the person chargeable with service tax as to why he should not pay the amount specified in the notice. The notice shall state the amount involved. This can be done within one year from the relevant date unless such short payment/ non-levy/refund was by reason of fraud or collusion or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts or contravention of the provisions of Chapter V or rules made there under with the intent to evade payment of service tax. In such cases, the time limit would be five years. There is an option of completing the proceedings by payment of the tax amount along with interest u/s 75 before issue of notice in cases pertaining to fraud, collusion etc., by paying the said tax and interest along with penalty of 25% of the service tax specified in the notice within 30 days from the date of communication of notice.
Section 85 of the Finance Act, allows an assessee or revenue aggrieved by any decision or order passed by an adjudicating authority subordinate to the Commissioner of Central Excise, to appeal to the CCE (Appeals) within three months from the date of receipt of the decision of the authority. Rule 8 of Service Tax Rules 1994 requires the appeal to be made on Form ST-4 in duplicate. A copy of the order sought to be appealed against is also to be filed with the appeal. Section 86 allows the assessee or revenue to make an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal against the order passed by either the CCE or CCE (Appeals). The appeal is to be filed within three months of the date on which the order sought to be appealed against is received by the assessee and as per Rule 9 of Service Tax Rules 1994, would be filed on Form ST-5 and would be in quadruplicate. Even orders passed either under section 73 dealing with recovery or a revision order of the CCE u/s 84 or order adjudging penalty u/s 83A may be appealed against.