See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/271194356

Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Hardness of Grade 91 Steel

Article in Metals · January 2015

DOI: 10.3390/met5010131

CITATIONS READS

73 4,470

5 authors, including:

Indrajit Charit Michael V. Glazoff

University of Idaho Idaho National Laboratory
99 PUBLICATIONS 4,165 CITATIONS 178 PUBLICATIONS 2,207 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Nonlinearity in Materials Science View project

Understand the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Friction Stir Processed Aluminum Bearing High Chromium Ferritic Stainless steel View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Michael V. Glazoff on 21 January 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Metals 2015, 5, 131-149; doi:10.3390/met5010131
OPEN ACCESS

metals
ISSN 2075-4701
www.mdpi.com/journal/metals/
Article

Effect of Heat Treatment on Microstructure and Hardness of

Grade 91 Steel
Triratna Shrestha 1, Sultan F. Alsagabi 1, Indrajit Charit 1, Gabriel P. Potirniche 2 and
Michael V. Glazoff 3,*

1
Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Idaho,
Moscow, ID 83844-3024, USA; E-Mails: triratna.shrestha@gmail.com (T.S.);
ssagabi@kacst.edu.sa (S.F.A.); icharit@uidaho.edu (I.C.)
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-0902, USA;
E-Mail: gabrielp@uidaho.edu
3
Energy Systems Integration, Idaho National Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-3710, USA

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: michael.glazoff@inl.gov;

Tel.: +1-208-526-8937.

Academic Editor: Hugo F. Lopez

Received: 4 December 2014 / Accepted: 12 January 2015 / Published: 21 January 2015

Abstract: Grade 91 steel (modified 9Cr-1Mo steel) is considered a prospective material

for the Next Generation Nuclear Power Plant for application in reactor pressure vessels at
temperatures of up to 650 °C. In this study, heat treatment of Grade 91 steel was performed by
normalizing and tempering the steel at various temperatures for different periods of time.
Optical microscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy in conjunction with
microhardness profiles and calorimetric plots were used to understand the microstructural
evolution including precipitate structures and were correlated with mechanical behavior of
the steel. Thermo-Calc™ calculations were used to support the experimental work.
Furthermore, carbon isopleth and temperature dependencies of the volume fraction of
different precipitates were constructed.

Keywords: modified 9Cr-1Mo steel; Grade 91 steel; heat treatment; microstructure;

differential scanning calorimetry; Thermo-Calc™; precipitates
Metals 2015, 5 132

1. Introduction

The Next Generation Nuclear Plant (NGNP) is expected to address the growing energy demand by
producing electricity and, at the same time, mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by co-producing
hydrogen from the process heat. The Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) is a Gen-IV reactor
system at the heart of the NGNP. VHTRs are designed to operate at temperatures much higher than
those of currently operating reactors. Moreover, they are designed for longer service periods
(60 years or more) compared to the current operating reactors [1]. The operating temperature of the
reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in VHTR can vary between 300 and 650 °C. Furthermore, the RPVs will
be more than double the size of a typical RPV as found in a Light Water Reactor (LWR) [2].
The modified 9Cr-1Mo steel (Grade 91) is a material of choice in fossil-fuel-fired power plants with
increased efficiency, service life, and reduction in emissions of CO2, NOx, and SO2. The efficiency of
fossil-fired power strongly depends on the temperature and pressure of steam. One percent increase in
net efficiency reduced the emission of CO2, NOx, SO2, and particulates by 2.4 metric ton, 2000 ton,
2000 ton, and 500 ton, respectively, while also reducing fuel costs by 2.4% [3]. Temperature of steam
in coal-fired power plant is expected to be in the range of 550–720 °C and pressure is expected to be
above 24 MPa [3–5].
Grade 91 steels are a ferritic-martensitic (F-M) class of steel with superior creep strength [6,7].
The addition of strong carbide and carbonitride formers like vanadium (V), niobium (Nb), and
titanium (Ti) lead to the precipitation of various particles, such as M23C6, and MX type precipitates:
(Ti,Nb)(N,C), (Nb,V)(C,N), and (V,Nb)(N,C). The smaller interparticle spacing and increased volume
fraction of the fine MX carbides enhance the alloy strength. These precipitates obstruct the movement
of dislocations, refine grains during normalizing, and delay plastic deformation [6,8]. However,
precipitates like Z-phase and Laves phase may lead to a decrease in the strength of the alloy by
weakening the solid solution.
Evolution of various precipitates and microstructure can be understood from the heat treatment,
differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) studies, and thermodynamic calculations using Thermo-Calc.
The heat treatment study of Grade 91 steel helps in understanding its microstructural evolution and
mechanical properties; as this material, whether being used for a reactor pressure vessel or boiler
component, goes through a series of heating, cooling, and welding processes. With the changes
involved in normalizing and tempering temperatures, different types of carbides such as M23C6,
Z-phase, Ti/Nb/V rich MX type carbide/carbonitrides precipitate and coarsen in Grade 91 steel
resulting in a change in the creep strength, ductility, hardness, and microstructure. Ahn et al. [9]
observed a decrease in the high temperature strength of an Nb containing steel due to coarsening of
Nb-rich precipitates. DSC was used to measure the heat absorbed or liberated during heating or
cooling associated with carbide precipitation and other phase changes. Ganesh et al. [10] were able to
find the phase transformation temperatures including temperature ranges for dissolution of various
precipitates in different low carbon steels.
The present article aims to elucidate the effects of various heat treatment conditions (normalizing
and tempering) on Grade 91 steel. There are numerous studies on the normalizing/tempering of Grade
91 steel [11–15], but these studies are limited to few temperatures and times. Thus, this paper has
taken about 50 normalizing and tempering conditions to study the relevant microstructural evolution.
Metals 2015, 5 133

To that end, a combination of microstructural characterization efforts and microhardness

measurements was utilized. The findings were discussed with the help of DSC studies, and Thermo-
Calc™ was used to understand the microstructural evolution and precipitate stability.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Material

The manufacturer-supplied chemical composition of ASTM A387 Grade 91 CL2 steel used in this
study is shown in Table 1. The hot rolled Grade 91 plates were obtained from American Alloy Steel,
Houston, TX, USA, in a normalized and tempered condition (i.e., austenitized at 1040 °C for
240 min followed by air cooling, and tempered at 790 °C for 43 min). The as-received plates were
10.4 cm × 10.4 cm × 1.27 cm in size. Heat treatment specimens were cut out from these plates using a
diamond wafering blade. At room temperature, the as-received Grade 91 steel had an average yield
strength of 533 MPa, ultimate tensile strength of 683 MPa and elongation to fracture of 19%.

Table 1. Chemical composition (in wt.%) of Grade 91 steel.

Element Nominal Measured
Cr 8.00–9.50 8.55
Mo 0.85–1.05 0.88
V 0.18–0.25 0.21
Nb 0.06–0.10 0.08
C 0.08–0.12 0.10
Mn 0.30–0.60 0.51
Cu 0.4 (max.) 0.18
Si 0.20–0.50 0.32
N 0.03–0.07 0.035
Ni 0.40 (max.) 0.15
P 0.02 (max.) 0.012
S 0.01 (max.) 0.005
Ti 0.01 (max.) 0.002
Al 0.02 (max.) 0.007
Zr 0.01 (max.) 0.001
Fe Balance Balance

2.2. Heat Treatment

Heat treatment was performed using an electric resistance furnace, capable of reaching a
temperature exceeding 1200 °C. Normalizing was first done on each sample within a temperature
range of 1020–1100 °C for 2, 4, and 8 h. Normalizing temperature and time were so chosen that
austenitization had been complete before tempering was carried out. Normalized samples were air
cooled down to room temperature before tempering at various temperatures and times. Samples that
have been normalized at 1040 °C for 2, 4 and 8 h were tempered at 690, 725, 745 and 790 °C for 2, 8 and
20 h. Tempering of samples normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h was expanded to include temperatures in the
range of 635–850 °C. This created a matrix of close to 50 possible combinations of normalizing and
Metals 2015, 5 134

tempering scenarios, which provided an adequate sequence to reveal the microstructural changes
during heat treatment.

2.3. Metallographic Characterization

Optical microscopy was performed with Olympus optical microscope, Center Valley, PA, USA,
on both the as-received and heat treated specimens for characterization of the grain structure. Optical
micrographs were taken for each sample and provided visual representation of the changing phases and
microstructural features. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) studies were done on selected
samples. Conventional metallographic procedures of cold mounting, grinding and polishing were
followed to prepare the specimen surface to 0.5 µm finish before etching was carried out using Marble’s
reagent: A solution made of 50 mL distilled water, 50 mL hydrochloric acid and 10 g of copper sulfate.
Subsequently, an Olympus light microscope, Center Valley, PA, USA was used to examine the
metallographic specimens, and an attached CCD camera was used to record the images.
For the TEM study, the sectioned samples were mechanically polished down to ~120 μm thickness,
and then 3 mm diameter disks were punched out of the samples. Those disks were then jet polished in
Fischione twin-jet polisher using a solution of 80 volume% methanol and 20 volume% nitric acid
solution at a temperature of about −40 °C. Dry ice bath was used to achieve low temperature. Philips
CM200, San Francisco, CA, USA, and JEOL JEM-2010, Pleasanton, CA, USA, TEMs operated at an
accelerating voltage of 200 kV were used to study in detail the grain and precipitate morphology of the
material under both as-received and select heat treated conditions. The scope of the study did not
involve extensive TEM study of these samples. The EDS system available in the same TEMs was used
to estimate the chemical composition of precipitates. Hardness was measured using a Leco Vickers
microhardness tester, St. Joseph, MI, USA; the applied load was 500 gf and the hold time was 15 s.

2.4. Thermodynamic Modeling

The calculations of thermodynamic equilibrium in Grade 91 steel and construction of C-isopleths were
done with the help of Thermo-Calc AB software (Thermo-Calc Classic Version S, Stockholm, Sweden).
Thermo-Calc TCFE6 database (Stockholm, Sweden) for iron-based alloys was used to conduct all the
equilibrium calculations. Due to the significant complexity of the Grade 91 steel (iron plus 13 alloying
elements), impurities such as S or P were excluded from the thermodynamic calculations.

2.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Differential scanning calorimetric study of Grade 91 steel was done using a Netzsch STA 409 PC
calorimeter, San Francisco, CA, USA. The DSC chamber was evacuated and purged several times with
the argon gas of high purity (99.999%), and the flow rate of argon was maintained at 85 cm3/min. The
sample mass ranging between 50 and 60 mg was found suitable for an acceptable signal to noise ratio.
The sensitivity curves for scan rate of 20 °C/min were calibrated using the melting point of pure indium,
tin, zinc, aluminum and gold under research grade argon atmosphere. Baseline calibrations were performed
by using a pair of empty crucibles corresponding to the heating rate of 20 °C/min. Non-isothermal
Metals 2015, 5 135

DSC measurements were done by heating the sample from 25 to 1400 °C, and then cooling was
undertaken at the same rate down to 200 °C.

3. Results

3.1. Microstructural Characteristics

The as-received Grade 91 steel had a tempered martensitic microstructure with a lot of precipitates,
as shown in Figure 1a,b. Precipitation hardening is one of the main strengthening mechanisms in
highly alloyed steels like Grade 91. Alloying elements, such as C, N, Ti, Nb, V, Cr and Mo, promote
the formation of precipitates like Cr-rich M23C6, and Ti or Nb or V-rich MX particles, where M stands
for metals, i.e., Cr, Mo, Ti, Nb or V. The Cr-rich M23C6 precipitates were elongated rod-like or
block-like particles, while Ti-rich, Nb-rich and V-rich MX precipitates had nearly spherical shape.
The Cr-rich M23C6 type precipitates were mainly observed at the lath boundaries and prior austenite
grain boundaries (PAGB). The dimension of the elongated rod-like and block-like Cr-rich precipitates
was measured, and found to have an average length of 285 ± 80 nm and width of 121 ± 39 nm, which
is similar to that reported by Shen et al. [16] in 11Cr F-M steel and Anderson et al. [17] in Grade 91
steel. The average diameter of near-spherical MX-type precipitates was 37 ± 15 nm, similar to values
reported in literature [3,16]. These types of precipitates were mainly located in the matrix and
martensitic lath structure. These thermally stable fine precipitates enhance the long term creep
resistance by impeding movement of mobile dislocations, prior austenite grain boundaries, martensite
lath and subgrain boundaries, and restrict fine grain structure from recrystallization. For a constant
normalizing time of 2 h, prior austenite grain size and martensite lath size increased with increasing
normalizing temperatures of 1020 °C–1100 °C, as shown in Figure 2a–d. The as-normalized (1040 °C
for 2 h) microstructure had hard martensitic lath structures with high dislocation density, as observed
in Figure 2c,d. Similarly, for constant normalizing temperature of 1040 °C, martensite lath size and
prior austenite grain size increased with increasing normalizing time of 2, 4 and 8 h. Figure 2e and f
shows the optical and TEM micrograph of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h, respectively.
Figure 2g shows the EDS spectrum of a M23C6 type precipitate shown in Figure 2f, indicating the
presence of Cr.

Figure 1. As-received microstructure: (a) optical and (b) TEM micrograph.

Metals 2015, 5 136

Figure 2. As-normalized optical micrograph (a) normalized at 1020 °C for 2 h;

(b) normalized at 1100 °C for 2 h; (c) normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h; (d) TEM micrograph
of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h; (e) optical micrograph of sample normalized at
1040 °C for 8 h; (f) TEM micrograph of a sample normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h; and
(g) the EDS spectrum of M23C6 type precipitate shown in Figure 2f.
Metals 2015, 5 137

The tempered microstructure of Grade 91 steel is shown in Figure 3. Figure 3a shows fine
microstructure of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered for 690 °C. Figure 3b shows
coarse martensitic microstructure of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h tempered at 745 °C for 8 h.
Figure 3c and d shows the martensitic lath structure of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and
tempered at 790 °C for 2 h. Grain size increased with increasing normalizing time, and tempering time.
The sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered at 790 °C for 2 h has grain size of ~11 μm,
while sample normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h and tempered at 790 °C for 20 h resulted in a grain size of
~17 μm. Figure 3e shows tempered martensitic structure of sample normalized at 1040 °C for 4 h and
tempered at 725 °C for 2 h. Sample normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h and tempered at 790 °C for 20 h had
coarse grain structure, as shown in Figure 3f.

Figure 3. Tempered optical micrographs: (a) normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered
at 690 °C for 2 h; (b) normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered at 745 °C for 8 h;
(c) normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered at 790 °C for 2 h; (d) TEM micrograph of
sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered at 790 °C for 2 h; optical micrographs
(e) normalized at 1040 °C for 4 h and tempered at 725 °C for 2 h; and (f) normalized at
1040 °C for 8 h and tempered at 790 °C for 20 h.
Metals 2015, 5 138

3.2. Hardness of Heat Treated Steel

Normalizing treatment is intended for austenitization and homogenization of the solid solution.
However, the right combination of normalizing temperature and time has to be found to optimize
the material mechanical properties. Hardness measurements were performed on the alloy samples
normalized at 1020, 1040, 1050, 1060, 1080 and 1100 °C while keeping the time constant at 2 h.
The hardness decreased with increasing normalizing temperature, as shown in Figure 4a. The hardness
value was about the same for normalizing carried out at 1020 and 1040 °C, but after that, the hardness
gradually decreased until reaching 1100 °C. The effect of change in normalizing time was studied by
heat treating Grade 91 steel at 1040 °C for 2 h, 4 h and 8 h. The hardness of the alloy decreased with
increasing normalizing time, as shown in Figure 4b.
Alloy normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h was tempered at 690, 725, 745 and 790 °C for 2 h, 8 h and
20 h. Hardness of the alloy decreased with increasing tempering temperature and time, as shown in
Figure 4c. Alloy tempered at 690 and 725 °C showed significant drop in hardness with increasing
tempering time, but for 745 and 790 °C the decrease in hardness was gradual. Similar profiles were
observed for samples normalized at 1040 °C for 4 h then tempered, and samples normalized at 1040 °C
for 8 h then tempered at aforementioned temperatures, as shown in Figure 4d,e, respectively. Figure 4g
shows the hardness of all tempered samples. Among all samples normalized at 1040 °C and tempered,
samples normalized for 2 h and tempered at 690 °C for 2 h had the highest hardness, while sample
normalized for 8 h and tempered at 790 °C for 20 h had the lowest hardness. The tempering temperature
of the sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h was expanded to temperatures slightly above AC1 temperatures.
Hardness of the alloy normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered for 2 h decreased with increasing
tempering temperature up to 745 °C, stabilized till 820 °C, then increased, as shown in Figure 4f.
Tempering above AC1 temperature was done to study the role of re-precipitation in Grade 91 steel.

3.3. Differential Scanning Calorimetry

Phase transformations of as-received (normalized and tempered) Grade 91 steel were studied using
DSC. The phase transformations and reactions associated with heating and cooling of the alloy, as
shown in Figure 5, are listed in Table 2. The listed temperatures for phase transformation and
precipitate in Table 2 were obtained from the DSC curves, particularly with the help of its derivative in
which inflection points are noticeably defined. The nature of the transformations was primarily
corroborated by the Thermo-Calc calculations. The transformation of martensite to ferrite started at
550 °C, and the Curie temperature (Tc) signifying the change in ferromagnetic property was observed
at 741 °C. The austenite phase started to form at 820 °C (Ac1), peaked at 848 °C (Acp), and the
transformation was complete at 870 °C (Ac3), which was confirmed by differential thermal analysis
(DTA) and the results of our thermodynamic calculations. The dissolution of M23C6 precipitate was
complete at 870 °C. Dissolution of (V,Nb)(N,C) type precipitates bottomed out at 998 °C, but beyond
that temperature they re-precipitated out. With the help of the first derivative of the heating curve,
the onset of the second dissolution reaction of fine (V,Nb)(N,C) type precipitates was found to be at
~1140 °C. From cooling curve and its first derivative, the martensite start temperature (Ms) was
calculated as 380 °C. Using AC1 as the onset temperature and AC3 as the end temperature, the DSC plot
Metals 2015, 5 139

was used to calculate the enthalpy associated with the α-ferrite→austenite phase transformation.
The phase transformation enthalpy (ΔºHα→γ) of 10 J/g was calculated.

Figure 4. Variation in Vickers microhardness for various heat treatment conditions.

(a) Variation in normalizing temperature; (b) samples normalized at 1040 °C for various times;
(c) variation with tempering temperature and time for sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h;
(d) Variation with tempering temperature and time for sample normalized at 1040 °C for 4 h;
(e) variation with tempering temperature and time for sample normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h;
(f) sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and tempered at various temperatures for 2 h; and
(g) normalized at 1040 °C and tempered samples.
Metals 2015, 5 140

Figure 5. Differential scanning calorimetric plot of as-received Grade 91 steel.

Table 2. Various transformation temperatures of Grade 91 steel.

Description of Phase Change Temperature (°C)
α′ + M23C6 + (V,Nb)(N,C) + Z-phase → α + M23C6 + (V,Nb)(N,C) + Z-phase 550
Tc (Curie Temperature) 741
α + M23C6 + (V,Nb)(N,C) + Z-phase → α + M23C6 + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) 770
α + M23C6 + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) → α + γ + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) + M23C6 820 (Ac1)
α + γ + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) + M23C6 → γ + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) 870 (Ac3)
γ + (V,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) → γ + (Ti,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) 1045
γ + (Ti,Nb)(N,C) + (Nb,V)(C,N) → δ + γ + (Ti,Nb)(N,C) 1270
δ + γ + (Ti,Nb)(N,C) → γ + δ 1397
Martensite start (Ms) 380

3.4. Thermo-Calc Calculations

The carbon isopleth for the Fe-Cr-Mn-Mo-Nb-Ni-Ti-V-N-C full system is shown in Figure 6a. It is
a property diagram, which represents the analog of the binary Fe-C phase diagram, but constructed for
the full alloy system. It was calculated using the previously mentioned TCFE6 thermodynamic
database. The bcc ferrite phase starts dissolving at ~810 °C and exists up to ~855 °C and then
reappears above 1270 °C, as noted in Table 2. In between 850 and 1270 °C, the fcc austenite phase
becomes stable. Other phases that are featured in the diagram in Figure 6a–c are the Z-phase;
the M23C6-phase; (with metal M being mostly Cr); the Ti-rich (Ti,Nb)(N,C) precipitates; the Nb-rich
and the Nb-poor (Nb,V)(C,N) precipitates; and the V-rich (V,Nb)(N,C) precipitates. All of the four
phases have variable compositions but the same fcc crystalline lattice. The following notation was
adopted for the latter four phases: In those cases when there was more carbon than nitrogen on a
particular sublattice, the (C,N) notation was used; in the opposite case, the (N,C) notation was used.
Similarly, the first position on the metal sublattice is assigned to a chemical element the concentration
of which is the highest, e.g., (Nb,V); in the opposite case, the (V,Nb) notation was used.
Metals 2015, 5 141

Figure 6. Carbon isopleth for Grade 91 steel. (a) Complete diagram: 600–1600 °C;
(b) 740–820 °C; (c) 800–1300 °C.

It was established that the Ti-bearing precipitates (Ti,Nb)(C,N) were more stable than the
(Nb,V)(C,N), and (V,Nb)(N,C) precipitates in the higher temperature range. Figure 7a shows a TEM
micrograph of the as-normalized (normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h) sample with Ti-rich MX precipitates.
The EDS spectrum of the Ti-MX particle is shown in Figure 7b. This example demonstrates the
significance of simulations for the computational thermodynamics driven alloy design.
The evolution of the ferrite phase and its volume fraction with respect to temperature is shown in
Figure 8a, and the evolution of M23C6 precipitate is shown in Figure 8b. The volume fraction of
Z-phase, (Nb,V)(N,C) + (Ti,Nb)(N,C), and (V,Nb)(N,C) precipitates are illustrated by Figure 8c,d.
Thermo-Calc calculations predicted that the volume fraction of M23C6 precipitate was higher than that
of V-rich and Nb-rich MX type precipitates, owing to the higher wt.% of Cr and Mo compared to Nb
and V. Higher resolution plot of the evolution of (V,Nb)(N,C) precipitate is shown in Figure 8d.
Special attention was paid to the possibility of a phase separation and/or atomic clustering.
Indeed, phase separation reaction and the miscibility gap were observed for the Fe-Cr system, so this
possibility could not be excluded for the Fe-9Cr-1Mo steel.
Metals 2015, 5 142

Figure 7. (a) A TEM micrograph of as-normalized (at 1040 °C for 2 h) sample; and
(b) EDS of a Ti-rich MX precipitate.

4. Discussion

4.1. As-Normalized Microstructure

Hardness of the Grade 91 steel normalized for 2 h at 1020, 1040, 1050, 1060, 1080 and 1100 °C
decreased with increasing temperature. Similarly, hardness of the as-normalized sample at 1040 °C
decreased with increasing normalizing time. As-normalized microstructure had hard martensitic lath
structures with high dislocation density, as shown in Figure 2d. Yoshino et al. [11] and Das et al. [18]
reported increase in the prior austenite grain size with increase in normalizing temperatures from 1050
to 1250 °C. However, hardness remained constant in the same temperature range. However, in the
current study, for normalizing carried out for 2 h in the temperature range of 1020–1100 °C, hardness
decreased with increasing normalizing temperature. The decrease in the hardness value and increase in
prior austenite grain size was due to a decrease in the volume fraction of precipitates with increased
normalizing temperature and time. Average diameter of MX precipitates increased from 35 nm after
normalizing at 1050 °C to 315 nm after normalizing at 1200 °C [11], leading to a decrease in the
number density of precipitates.
Metals 2015, 5 143

Figure 8. Evolutions of (a) the ferrite phase; (b) M23C6 precipitate; (c) Z-phase, Nb-rich
MX, V-rich MX, and Ti-rich MX precipitates; and (d) high resolution plot of (V,Nb)(N,C)
precipitate as a function of temperature.

Given the higher carbon solubility in austenite than in alpha ferrite, carbide precipitates dissolve in
austenite. With increased diffusion at a higher temperature and longer time, the precipitates coarsen
while the lath size and grain size also increase. Grade 91 steel normalized at 1040 °C for 8 h had a
martensitic lath width of 473 ± 105 nm, and the size of the needle shaped M23C6 precipitates was
136 ± 75 nm in length and 28 ± 20 nm in width. While the sample normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h had a
martensitic lath size of 335 ± 115 nm, while the M23C6 precipitates were 78 ± 15 nm in length and
13 ± 4 nm in width. At higher normalizing temperature, considerable grain growth occurred, but at
lower normalizing temperature the austenite grain structure was finer. Moreover, normalizing below
900 °C resulted in partially transformed ferrite with patches of martensitic structure [12]. However,
the change in the normalizing temperature in the range of 1020–1100 °C can result in different
precipitate size distribution(s) that could possibly affect the mechanical behavior of the alloys.

4.2. Tempered Microstructure

The as-normalized hard martensitic lath structure with high dislocation density changed to
stress-free, relaxed tempered martensitic structure upon tempering. Upon tempering, the normalized
steel is reheated to a temperature just below Ac1, which relieves stress in martensitic structure via carbon
Metals 2015, 5 144

diffusion and carbide formation. With increased tempering time, the diffusion of carbon is increased and
simultaneously became stress relieved. For example, a P92 steel normalized at 1050 °C showed a
decrease in hardness with increasing tempering temperature from 525 up to 720 °C. Similarly, the tensile
strength and yield strength decreased with increasing tempering temperature [13]. Moreover, for Grade
91 steel tempered at 765, 730, and 680 °C, specimens tempered at the lowest temperature had the highest
creep strength at 600 °C, as shown by Sawada et al. [14]. Tempering above Ac1 temperature decreased
the toughness of the material due to the formation of fresh martensite as found by Silwal et al. [19]. In the
present work, the hardness decreased with increasing tempering temperature till Ac1 temperature (820 °C).
The decrease in hardness, as seen in Figure 4g, is due to the coarsening of precipitates, dissolution of
M23C6 carbides, and breakdown of martensitic lath structure.
Coarser precipitates are not effective in impeding the mobility of dislocations, and affect the strength
of the steel [6]. Decrease in hardness with increased temperature can also in part be associated with the
increased molybdenum in carbides. In Fe-Mo-C steels tempered at 700 °C, Shtansky and Inden [20]
observed 4% increase in the molybdenum content in M23C6 precipitates after increasing the tempering
time from 25 to 500 h. Increased molybdenum content in precipitates implies removal of Mo from the
matrix, thus weakening the solid solution. Moreover, the M23C6 precipitates located on the prior austenite
grain boundaries penetrate into the grains with increasing tempering time. The stability of hardness at
temperatures around 800 °C reflects the maximum precipitation rate for 0.1 wt.% C in the alloy. However,
above 820 °C, the hardness increased because of secondary hardening resulting from increased volume
fraction of (V,Nb)(N,C) and (Nb,V)(N,C) precipitates, as noted in Figure 8c for the respective precipitates.
The tempered microstructure still consisted of precipitates and subgrain structures but with reduced
dislocation density, as seen in Figure 3d. MX type precipitates were observed inside the subgrain
structure and martensite lath structure. M23C6 precipitates were mainly located on the prior austenite
grain boundaries and martensitic lath boundaries. The microstructure of Grade 91 steel tempered at the
lowest temperature had much finer martensite lath size and higher dislocation density. The as-received
material had a prior austenitic grain size of ~11 μm, while that of the sample normalized at 1040 °C for
8 h and tempered at 790 °C for 20 h was 17 μm. The martensitic lath size increased and dislocation
density decreased upon tempering. Dudko et al. [13] noted that when tempered at 720 °C for 3 h,
the lath size increased to 300 nm from 250 nm, and the dislocation density decreased to 6.2 × 1014 m−2
from 7.0 × 1014 m−2 compared to the as-normalized microstructure. In 9%–12% Cr heat resistant steels,
the dislocation density, hardness, and creep rupture life were generally reduced, but ductility and
subgrain size increased with increasing tempering temperature [3].
The transformation of martensite to alpha-ferrite is dependent on the tempering temperature and
holding time. The tempering temperature and holding time of tempering can be described by a single
empirical parameter known as the Hollomon-Jaffe parameter (P)
P = T (C + logt) (1)
where T (K) is temperature, C (40) constant, and t (s) time. Generally, in the Hollomon-Jaffe
parameter, 20 is used as the constant (C), but in this study C (40) gave the best fit. Figure 9 shows the
Hollomon-Jaffe parameter for Grade 91 steel normalized at 1040 °C/2 h, and tempered in the
temperature range of 635–820 °C for 2, 8 and 20 h. Figure 9 can be used to describe the variation of
hardness in the tempered Grade 91 steel as a function of tempering temperature/time (as shown in
Metals 2015, 5 145

Figures 3 and 4). In the plot in Figure 9, two distinct regions could be observed: A region with a steep
decrease in hardness with increasing Hollomon-Jaffe parameter followed by a region where the
hardness did not vary much. The lower Hollomon-Jaffe parameter signifies lower tempering
temperature/time where microstructural evolution takes place gradually and did not achieve quite the
equilibrium microstructure. However, at higher Hollomon-Jaffe parameter the microstructure achieves
close-to-equilibrium structure and the microstructural parameters did not change so much to affect
hardness to an appreciable extent. Figure 8 shows the Thermo-Calc calculations indicating a decrease
in the volume fraction of precipitates around AC1 temperature. The data related to tempering condition
above AC1 have not been included in Figure 9 as the Hollomon-Jaffe parameter does not apply to heat
treatment above AC1 temperature.

Figure 9. Hollomon-Jaffe relation of Grade 91 steel normalized at 1040 °C for 2 h and

tempered at various temperatures and times.

4.3. DSC Study

The DSC plot shown in Figure 5 tracked the phase changes and reactions happening during heating
and cooling of Grade 91 steel. Various temperatures associated with phase changes and reactions are
listed in Table 2. DSC plot can slightly change depending on the heat treatment history of the material.
Masuyama [15] reported that for various tempering temperatures, Ac1 temperature was between 820
and 851 °C and the martensite transformation was ~400 °C. In this study, the Ac1 temperature was
820 °C and the Ms temperature was 380 °C. DSC study of Grade 91 steel showed the change in the
enthalpy associated with α-ferrite to austenite phase transformation is dependent on the starting
microstructure produced by thermal aging [21]. A list of enthalpy change associated with α-ferrite to
austenite phase transformation (ΔºHα→γ) is included in Table 3. The ΔºHα→γ for or pure iron was
16 J·g−1, but decreased with increased addition of alloying elements. Table 3 includes the enthalpy
values of phase transformation (alpha-ferrite to austenite) for various steels. Substitutional solutes
(such as W, Mo, V, Ti, Ta, Si) present in the steels in one or other combination are all ferrite-stabilizers.
Even though steels contain carbon (an austenite stabilizer), the amount of C is fairly low. Thus, the
addition of ferrite stabilizers to pure iron decreases the enthalpy, requiring more energy to transform to
austenite and leading to a higher Ac1/Ac3 temperature. The volume fraction of (V,Nb)(C,N)
Metals 2015, 5 146

precipitates peaked initially at 790 °C and 850 °C, then started to dissolve in the matrix with the
dissolution bottoming out at ~1000 °C and then peaked at ~1140 °C; these temperatures were captured
with the help of the first derivative of the DSC heating curve. Furthermore, these temperatures were
predicted by the Thermo-Calc calculations as shown in Figure 8c,d. The activation energy of Nb
diffusion in the alpha-iron lattice is larger than those of Mo and Cr diffusion, and self-diffusion of
iron [22]. Thus, the dissolution of Nb rich precipitates takes place at a higher temperature compared to
the M23C6 precipitates. The MX type precipitates rich in V dissolve in the matrix before Nb, given the
smaller atomic radius of V compared to Nb.

Table 3. Comparison of enthalpy associated with α→γ phase change.

Steel Composition (wt.%) ΔºHα→γ (J·g−1) Reference
Pure Iron 16 [21]
9Cr-1Mo 15 [10]
9Cr-1Mo-0.001V-0.1C 15 [21]
9Cr-1Mo-0.1C-0.42Si 13 [10]
9Cr-1W-0.23V-0.06Ta-0.1C 12 [23]
9Cr-1Mo-0.21V-0.08Nb-0.1C-0.002Ti 10 Present study

4.4. Thermo-Calc Calculations

In the present study, the normalizing temperatures (1020, 1040, 1050, 1060, 1080, and 1100 °C)
and the temperature range of the subsequent tempering (690, 725, 745, and 790 °C) were of most
interest. Figures 6 and 8 show the evolution of various phases as a function of temperature. These
phase and precipitates play an important role in the formation of microstructure and strength of the
heat treated alloy. The Thermo-Calc calculations predicted the existence of the Z-phase, but it was not
observed in the TEM studies. During cooling, the austenite phase undergoes partial dissolution
(the onset of transformation) at temperature ~850 °C and disappears completely at ~810 °C, in almost
complete agreement with the findings of the DSC experiments (temperatures 870 and 820 °C,
respectively). The Thermo-Calc does not make any distinction between α-ferrite and the δ-ferrite
because they have the same bcc lattice. It would be appropriate to say that the α-ferrite dissolved at
~850 °C, but the δ-ferrite appeared at ~1270 °C peaked at ~1440 °C and then gradually dissolved as
seen in Figure 8a.
The mass fraction of M23C6 precipitates remained constant up to the Ac1 temperature but decreased
drastically as austenite phase started forming. Given that austenite has higher affinity for C than
α-ferrite, the M23C6 precipitates exist up to 865 °C, and then dissolve into the austenitic matrix. The
mass fraction of MX type precipitates was constant till Ac3 temperature, but then gradually decreased
with increased temperature and totally dissolved at ~1200 °C [24]. In the present study, the volume
fraction of Nb-rich MX increased at ~770 °C, started to decrease rapidly after ~850 °C, then gradually
at ~1120 °C till 1260 °C. Since there was no clear distinction between the evolution of (Ti,Nb)(N,C)
precipitate and (Nb,V)(N,C) precipitate, one could speculate that 1120 °C marks the onset of the phase
separation reaction. As indicated in Figure 8c,d, the line indicating both (Nb,V)(N,C) and
(Ti,Nb)(N,C) precipitates has a tail to it. The tail indicates the presence of Ti-rich MX which is stable
up to ~1400 °C, as shown in Figure 6a. At around 470 °C, the dissolution of the M6C precipitates was
Metals 2015, 5 147

observed in the Thermo-Calc calculations, not the Laves phase (absent at any temperature for
x(C) = 0.001 wt.%). Laves phase was not observed in the as-received 9% Cr alloys containing 0.1%
and 0.05% C with 0.03% Ti [3]. The Z-phase disappeared as the Nb-rich MX precipitates started to
form. It remains to be established whether at such a low temperature there is enough time for the
formation of such precipitates (M6C). However, they were identified in the computed phase diagram
quite reliably for different alloy compositions.
The temperature of 1045 °C corresponded to the terminus of the carbon solubility in the V-MX +
Nb-MX phase field, as shown in Figure 6a. At this temperature range, a phase transformation reaction
accompanied by the formation of the three types of Nb-bearing FCC precipitates: Nb-rich, V-rich and
Ti-rich was obtained. Whether this could be considered as a transformation of the V-rich precipitates
of the V-MX type (containing ~47 wt.% V and ~32% of Nb) into a new FCC phase in which the
amounts of Nb and V are practically reversed, and the evolution of Ti-rich precipitate remains to be
studied. Hong et al. [25] reported dendritic Nb-rich carbonitrides in high strength low alloy steel. On
reheating the HSLA steel from 1050 to 1400 °C, the Nb content decreased with increasing temperature
till 1250 °C. However, eventually, Ti started to dissolve into the austenite phase after 1300 °C.
A similar observation was made in Grade 91 steel where the (Ti,Nb)(N,C) precipitate was stable at higher
temperature compared to (Nb,V)(C,N) and (V,Nb)(N,C) precipitates. The solubility of (V,Nb)(C,N)
was higher than that of (Ti,Nb)(C,N) and (Nb,Ti)(C,N) in both ferrite and austenite phases [26].

5. Conclusions

The heat treatment study of Grade 91 steel was performed, and Thermo-Calc calculations were used
to predict the stability of various phases and provide guidance for future research in this direction.
The hardness of the alloy decreased with increasing normalizing and tempering temperatures and
times. The decrease in hardness was attributed to increase in the grain size, martensite lath size, and
decrease in dislocation density and precipitate coarsening. Differential scanning calorimetry indicated
the various phase changes and precipitate reactions taking place during heating and cooling of Grade
91 steel. The Thermo-Calc predicted the evolution of ferrite and austenite phases, and various
precipitates. With the help of differential scanning calorimetry study and Thermo-Calc, various
temperatures important to heat treatment of Grade 91 steel were identified. Normalizing of Grade 91
steel should be carried out in the temperature range of 1040–1270 °C, and tempering in the
temperature range of 745–820 °C. Specific tempering optimization was not feasible in this study since
only hardness was evaluated without any measurement of ductility and other relevant properties.

Acknowledgments

This research was performed using funding received from the DOE Office of Nuclear Energy’s
Nuclear Energy University Programs (NEUP) through the US Department of Energy Grant No. 42246
release 59. We would like to thank Zack Wuthrich and Tshering Sherpa for their assistance with the
optical microscopy work.
Metals 2015, 5 148

Author Contributions

Triratna Shrestha carried out experiments under Indrajit Charit and Gabriel P. Potirniche’s guidance.
Michael V. Glazoff performed the ThermoCalc calculations under Indrajit Charit and Triratna Shrestha’s
guidance. Data analyses were done in collaboration and characterization were done by Triratna Shrestha
and Sultan F. Alsagabi.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

1. Charit, I.; Murty, K.L. Structural materials issues for the next generation fission reactors. JOM
2010, 62, 67–74.
2. Murty, K.L.; Charit, I. Structural materials for Gen-IV nuclear reactors: Challenges and opportunities.
J. Nucl. Mater. 2008, 383, 189–195.
3. Rojas, D. 9%–12% Cr Heat Resistant Steels: Alloy Design, Tem Characterization of
Microstructure Evolution and Creep Response at 650 °C. Ph.D. Thesis, Ruhr-University Bochum,
North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, 2011.
4. Vishwanathan, R.; Bakker, W.T. Materials for boilers in ultra-supercritical power plants.
In Proceedings of the 2000 International Joint Power Generation Conference, Miami Beach, FL,
USA, 23–26 July 2000; pp. 1–22.
5. Buhre, B.J.P.; Gupta, R.; Richardson, S.; Sharma, A.; Spero, C.; Wall, T. PF-Fired supercritical
boilers: Operational issues and coal quality impacts. Available online: http://www.steamforum.
com/pictures/Supercritical%20TN%2020%20PF%20Super%20Critical.pdf (accessed on 20 January
2015).
6. Shrestha, T.; Basirat, M.; Charit, I.; Potirniche, G.P.; Rink, K.K. Creep deformation mechanisms
in modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. J. Nucl. Mater. 2012, 423, 110–119.
7. Basirat, M.; Shrestha, T.; Potirniche, G.P.; Charit, I.; Rink, K. A study of the creep behavior of
modified 9Cr-1Mo steel using continuum damage modeling. Int. J. Plast. 2012, 37, 95–107.
8. Shrestha, T.; Basirat, M.; Charit, I.; Potirniche, G.P.; Rink, K.K. Creep rupture behavior of Grade
91 steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2013, 565, 382–391.
9. Ahn, J.C.; Sim, G.M.; Lee, K.S. Effect of aging treatment on high temperature strength of Nb
added ferritic stainless steels. Mater. Sci. Forum 2005, 475, 191–194.
10. Ganesh, B.J.; Raju, S.; Rai, A.K.; Mohandas, E.; Vijayalakshmi, M.; Rao, K.B.S.; Raj, B.
Differential scanning calorimetry study of diffusional and martensitic transformations in some
9 wt-% Cr low carbon ferritic steels. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2011, 27, 500–512.
11. Yoshino, M.; Mishima, Y.; Toda, Y.; Kushima, H.; Sawada, K.; Kimura, K. Influence of normalizing
heat treatment on precipitation behavior in modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. Mater. High Temp. 2008, 25,
149–158.
12. Totemeier, T.C.; Tian, H.; Simpson, J.A. Effect of normalization temperature on the creep
strength of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. 2005, 37, 1519–1525.
Metals 2015, 5 149

13. Dudko, V.; Delyakov, A.; Kaibyshev, R. Effect of tempering on mechanical properties and
microstructure of a 9% Cr heat resistant steel. Mater. Sci. Forum 2012, 706, 841–846.
14. Sawada, K.; Suzuki, K.; Kushima, H.; Tabuchi, M.; Kimura, K. Effect of tempering temperature
on Z-phase formation and creep strength in 9Cr-1Mo-V-Nb-N steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 480,
558–563.
15. Masuyama, F.; Nishimura, N. Experience with creep-strength enhanced ferritic steels and new
emerging computational methods In Proceedings of the 2004 ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and
Piping Conference, San Diego, CA, USA, 25–29 July 2004; Volume 476, pp. 85–92.
16. Shen, Y.Z.; Kim, S.H.; Cho, H.D.; Han, C.H.; Ryu, W.S. Identification of precipitate phases in a
11Cr ferritic/martensitic steel using electron microdiffraction. J. Nucl. Mater. 2010, 400, 64–68.
17. Anderson, P.; Bellgard, T.; Jones, F.L. Creep deformation in a modified 9Cr-1Mo steel.
Mater. Sci. Technol. 2003, 19, 207–213.
18. Das, C.R.; Albert, S.K.; Bhaduri, A.K.; Srinivasan, G.; Murty, B.S. Effect of prior microstructure
and mechanical properties of modified 9Cr-1Mo steel weld joints. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2008, 477,
185–192.
19. Silwal, B.; Li, L.; Deceuster, A.; Griffiths, B. Effect of post-weld heat treatment on toughness of
heat-affected zone of Grade 91 steel. Welding J. 2013, 92, 80s–87s.
20. Shtansky, D.V.; Inden, G. Phase transformation in Fe-Mo-C and Fe-W-C steels—II. Eutectoid
reaction of M23C6 carbide decomposition during austenitization. Acta Mater. 1997, 45,
2879–2895.
21. Ganesh, B.J.; Raju, S.; Mohandas, E.; Vijayalakshmi, M. Effect of thermal aging on the
transformation temperatures and specific heat characteristics of 9Cr-1Mo ferritic steel.
Defect Diffus. Forum 2008, 279, 85–90.
22. Oono, N.; Nitta, H.; Iijima, Y. Diffusion of Nb in α-iron. Mater. Trans. 2003, 44, 2078–2083.
23. Raju, S.; Ganesh, B.J.; Rai, A.K.; Saroja, S.; Mohandas, E.; Vijayalakshmi, M.; Raj, B. Drop
calorimetry studies on 9Cr-1W-0.23V-0.06Ta-0.09C reduced activation steel. Int. J. Thermophys.
2010, 31, 399–415.
24. Hald, J.; Korcakova, L.; Danielsen, H.K.; Dahl, K.V. Thermodynamics and kinetic modeling:
Creep resistant materials. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2009, 24, 149–158.
25. Hong, S.G.; Jun, H.J.; Kang, K.B.; Park, C.G. Evolution of precipitates in the Nb-Ti-V
microalloyed HSLA steels during reheating. Scr. Mater. 2003, 48, 1201–1206.
26. Taylor, K.A. Solubility products of titanium-, vanadium-, and niobium-carbide in ferrite.
Scr. Mater. 1995, 32, 7–12.

© 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

View publication stats