Chronic Stroke Patients Show Early and Robust Improvements in Muscle and Functional Performance in Response To..
Chronic Stroke Patients Show Early and Robust Improvements in Muscle and Functional Performance in Response To..
Chronic Stroke Patients Show Early and Robust Improvements in Muscle and Functional Performance in Response To..
net/publication/267734440
CITATIONS READS
6 164
5 authors, including:
Peter Sojka
Mid Sweden University
68 PUBLICATIONS 2,833 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Flywheel resistance exercise for performance, health and rehabilitation View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rodrigo Fernandez-Gonzalo on 18 November 2014.
The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document
and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150 JNER JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING
AND REHABILITATION
Abstract
Background: Resistance exercise comprising eccentric (ECC) muscle actions enhances muscle strength and
function to aid stroke patients in conducting daily tasks. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of a
novel ECC-overload flywheel resistance exercise paradigm to induce muscle and functional performance adaptations
in chronic stroke patients.
Methods: Twelve patients (~8 years after stroke onset) performed 4 sets of 7 coupled concentric (CON) and ECC actions
using the affected limb on a flywheel leg press (LP) device twice weekly for 8 weeks. Maximal CON and ECC isokinetic
torque at 30, 60 and 90°/s, isometric knee extension and LP force, and CON and ECC peak power in LP were measured
before and after training. Balance (Berg Balance Scale, BBS), gait (6-Min Walk test, 6MWT; Timed-Up-and-Go, TUG),
functional performance (30-s Chair-Stand Test, 30CST), spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale) and perceived participation
(Stroke Impact Scale, SIS) were also determined.
Results: CON and ECC peak power increased in both the trained affected (34 and 44%; P < 0.01), and the untrained,
non-affected leg (25 and 34%; P < 0.02). Power gains were greater (P = 0.008) for ECC than CON actions. ECC isokinetic
torque at 60 and 90°/s increased in the affected leg (P < 0.04). The increase in isometric LP force for the trained, affected
leg across tests ranged 10-20% (P < 0.05). BBS (P = 0.004), TUG (P = 0.018), 30CST (P = 0.024) and SIS (P = 0.058) scores
improved after training. 6MWT and spasticity remained unchanged.
Conclusions: This novel, short-term ECC-overload flywheel RE training regime emerges as a valid, safe and viable
method to improve muscle function, balance, gait and functional performance in men and women suffering from
chronic stroke.
Keywords: Balance, Bilateral asymmetry, Muscle strength, Neuro-rehabilitation
© 2014 Fernandez-Gonzalo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public
Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this
article, unless otherwise stated.
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 2 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
was obtained. In particular, our pre-study assessments subsequent sessions. A standardized warm-up comprised
revealed a clear-cut risk for muscle strains and joint three submaximal unilateral isometric actions at 90° knee
(mainly knee and hip) injury as the affected leg exhibited flexion. Beginning with the non-affected leg, three max-
diminished joint stiffness and stability while performing imal isometric actions, each sustained for 5 s, were exe-
unrestricted force through the entire range of motion cuted 1 min apart. Peak torque (Nm) averaged over a 1-s
and brief eccentric overload. Thus, a custom made device window was chosen for data analysis. After 2 min recov-
offered lateral leg support avoiding involuntary abduction ery, unilateral CON and ECC isokinetic torque was
of the affected limb such that the limb was stabilized assessed at 30, 60 and 90°/s, respectively. One min was
and ankle, knee and hip joints positioned in the same allowed between different speed settings, and 2 min be-
vertical plane during leg flexion/extension. Subjects were tween CON and ECC actions. Three submaximal actions
instructed not to perform any additional strenuous lower- preceded each maximal attempt. The highest peak torque
limb activity during the intervention. The study protocol for each muscle action and speed mode was chosen for
was approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in further analysis.
Umeå (No. 09-190aM; 2009-1394-31).
Peak power
Balance, gait, functional performance, spasticity and Peak power was assessed ~6 days before and ~5 days
perceived participation after the intervention. Patients completed 2 sets of 7
Tests were performed ~12 days before and after the train- maximal CON-ECC unilateral actions for either limb
ing period by an independent physiotherapist blinded to using a flywheel leg press (YoYo® Technology AB,
the intervention and purpose of the study. The Berg Stockholm, Sweden; Figure 1) device with a lateral leg
Balance Scale (BBS; [25]) assessed balance. This test support to avoid involuntary abduction of the affected
includes 14 different items to determine dynamic and limb during exercise. This apparatus provides unlimited
static balance. Gait performance was assessed by the resistance during coupled CON and ECC actions using
Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG; [26]) and the 6-Minute Walk the inertia of a spinning flywheel (0.036 kg · m-2) set in
tests (6MWT; [27]). In the TUG test, patients were rotation by the trainee. Following initiation of flywheel
instructed to rise from a chair, walk at a fast, still comfort- momentum using modest effort, 7 consecutive repeti-
able speed 3 m, turn around, walk back and sit down in tions were performed with maximal effort, accelerating
the chair. Time to the nearest second was recorded in rotation and hence speed of the wheel during CON, and
three trials, and the best value was used for data analysis. produce deceleration in the subsequent ECC action. Pa-
The 6MWT consisted of walking 6 min at a self-selected tients were instructed to push with maximal effort
speed. The distance was recorded to the nearest meter. through the entire range of motion in the CON action
Functional performance was also measured by means of (i.e., from ~70° to almost full extension), then, and as
the 30-s Chair-Stand Test (30CST; [28]). From a seated the strap rewinds about the flywheel shaft, aim at resist-
position, patients were requested to raise from a chair to ing the inertial force. Thus, patients were requested to
standing, and sit down as many times as possible during gently resist during the first third of the ECC action, and
30 s. The Modified Ashworth Scale [29] was used to assess then apply maximal breaking force to stop the move-
spasticity of the lower limbs. Perceived participation was ment at about 70° knee flexion. Once the flywheel comes
assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS-Patient-v.2.0 to a stop, a subsequent CON action is instantly initiated.
[30]). Items from the SIS related to physical deficits, every- This methodology and strategy has successfully been used
day activities and ability to move in- and outside home to elicit ECC overload [20,23]. Peak power was measured
(domains 1, 5 and 6) were completed by the participants. in all repetitions using an encoder (100 Hz) and associated
Analysis of SIS was performed following Duncan et al. software (SmartCoach™, Stockholm, Sweden). Three min
[30]. Briefly, mean values for domains 1, 5, and 6 were cal- recovery was allowed between sets. A 10-min warm-up on
culated (100 x (mean value of domains 1, 5 and 6 – 1)/ a cycle ergometer preceded the peak power tests.
(5 – 1)) for each patient. The greater the relative value,
the fewer the restrictions in perceived participation. Isometric leg press force
Isometric LP force was measured using the flywheel de-
Isometric and isokinetic knee extension torque vice ~3 days before and ~7 days after the intervention.
Unilateral knee extension torque of either leg was A foot-platform with a load cell was mounted for each
assessed ~10 days before and ~3 days after completing foot on the exercise device, allowing individual force
the training intervention. The patient was positioned in measurements (100 Hz) of each leg. Isometric tests were
the testing device (IsoMed2000 dynamometer; D&R performed bilaterally and unilaterally for either leg at 90
Ferstl GmbH, Hemau, Germany; 200 Hz). Individual and 120° knee angle. Patients were instructed to push
machine settings were recorded, saved and replicated in as hard as possible for 5 s against the foot-platform,
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 4 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
adjusted and fixed in the desired position using a chain unrelated to the intervention per se prevented three in-
system. Additional instructions and verbal encourage- dividuals to complete the prescribed study protocol. In-
ment to ensure maximal voluntary effort in tests using dividual characteristics of the remaining 12 patients
both the affected and non-affected limbs were offered. showing 100% compliance to the study protocol are
Two repetitions, with 1 min recovery in between, were depicted in Table 1. Six individuals were cognitively in-
carried out for each action mode. A third repetition was tact; 6 exhibited mild aphasia (5 showed expressive form
allowed if values differed >5%. Peak force averaged over and 1 individual combined expressive and impressive).
a 1 s window was chosen for data analysis. A warm-up Eleven patients were on medication i.e., antihypertensive,
consisting of 10 min cycling and 3 submaximal bilateral lipid lowering or anti-thrombotic, or combinations of
isometric repetitions preceded these tests. these; 3 were prescribed anti-depressants i.e., selective
serotonin reuptake inhibitors; 3 patients were on anti-
Training intervention epileptic drugs i.e., lamotrigin and levetiracetam or
Patients performed unilateral RE training using the af- carbamazepine. Medication was neither altered nor intro-
fected leg on the flywheel LP device (Figure 1), 2 days duced during the study. Four patients had received botulli-
per week during 8 weeks with ≥48 h of rest between ses- num toxin injection at some time i.e., injection to arm and
sions. Four sets of 7 repetitions at maximal effort were leg muscles 3 months (n = 1) or 24 months (n = 3) prior to
performed from ~70° knee flexion to almost full exten- the study.
sion, with 3 min recovery between sets. Peak CON and
ECC power was measured (see above) in all repetitions. Training intervention
Real time performance feedback was offered to the There was a session x muscle action interaction for peak
trainees at all times. Any training session followed a power (F = 5.5, P <0.0005; Figure 2). CON and ECC
warm-up consisting of 10-min cycling at a submaximal peak power increased from session 5 to 16 (P <0.05;
load and one set of 7 coupled CON/ECC actions using except for CON in session 6; P = 0.082). Peak power
modest effort on the LP apparatus. was greater for ECC than CON in sessions 5, 8-9 and
11-16 (P <0.04).
Data analysis
Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), Isometric and isokinetic knee extension torque
unless otherwise indicated. Balance, gait and functional The non-affected showed 1.4-fold greater isometric knee
performance variables were analyzed by a one-way extension torque than the affected leg both pre and post
ANOVA over time. Isometric knee extension torque was training (Table 2; main effect of leg; F = 63.9, P <0.0005).
analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with repeated mea- There was no change over time for either leg. CON
surements for time and leg. CON and ECC isokinetic isokinetic peak torque was 1.3-fold greater in the non-
torque were examined independently employing a three- affected than the affected leg (main effect of leg; F = 15.5,
way ANOVA (factors time, leg and speed). Peak power P = 0.002), and higher at low compared with high angular
was analyzed independently for CON and ECC muscle velocities (main effect of speed; F = 40.6, P <0.0005).
actions by a two-way ANOVA with repeated measure- CON isokinetic torque was unaltered after training
ments for time and leg. In addition, a two-way ANOVA (Table 2). ECC isokinetic peak torque showed leg x time
(factors time x muscle action) was performed to assess interaction (F = 5.6, P = 0.038). Thus, only the affected,
differences between CON and ECC actions. Isometric LP trained leg showed increased ECC-torque from pre to post
force at 90 and 120° was examined separately using training at 60 (8%; P = 0.036) and 90°/s (7%; P <0.0005;
a three-way ANOVA with factors time, leg and mode Table 2). Overall ECC torque was greater in the non-
(bilateral/unilateral). Training data were examined employ- affected than the affected leg (main effect of leg; F = 56.1,
ing a two-way ANOVA (factors session and muscle action). P <0.0005).
Data normality was assessed through histograms and the
Shapiro-Wilk test. When significant interactions were Peak power
found, simple effect tests were employed. To compen- There was a time x muscle action interaction (F = 11.0,
sate for multiple post hoc comparisons, the false discovery P = 0.008) in peak power. Thus, ECC peak power in-
rate procedure was used [31]. The level of significant was creased more than CON in both the affected and the
set at 5% (P <0.05). non-affected leg (Figure 3A). There was a time x leg
interaction in ECC peak power (F = 5.1, P = 0.046).
Results Thus, although ECC peak power increased in both the
Fifteen patients, most of them being habitually active affected and non-affected leg (affected; P = 0.019; non-
who recently had experienced infrequent low intensity affected; P = 0.003), the gains were greater for the af-
strength training, were initially recruited. Medical issues, fected leg (44% vs. 35%). In addition, the non-affected
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 5 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
leg produced more ECC peak power both pre (P = 0.001) (F = 9.4, P = 0,011; Figure 3B). Thus, while the affected
and post training (P <0.0005), compared with the af- leg produced similar force during bilateral and unilat-
fected limb. CON peak power showed no time x leg eral conditions, the non-affected leg produced higher
interaction. However, there was a main effect of time force in the unilateral than the bilateral test, both at
(F = 10.2, P = 0.009) as CON peak power increased in pre (P = 0.036) and post (P = 0.001) training.
both the affected (34%) and the non-affected (24%) leg. Isometric LP force at 120° knee angle. There was a
In addition, there was a main effect of leg (F = 31.7, time x leg interaction (F = 8.6, P = 0.014; Figure 3C).
P <0.0005) due to greater overall CON peak power Thus, while the affected leg showed increased isometric
in the non-affected than the affected leg. force both bilaterally (17%, P = 0.045) and unilaterally
(20%, P = 0.021), force of the non-affected leg remained
Isometric leg press force unchanged. Force was greater for the non-affected
Isometric LP force at 90° knee angle. There was a main than the affected leg at pre training in both the bilateral
effect of time (F = 5.1, P = 0.045) mainly as the affected (P = 0.027) and unilateral (P <0.0005) mode. Force was
leg produced greater force at post compared with pre greater in the affected vs. non-affected limb in the unilat-
training (P = 0.003 and P = 0.008 for unilateral and bilateral eral mode only at post training (P = 0.025). There was a
mode, respectively). There was a leg x mode interaction leg x mode interaction (F = 10.7, P = 0.008). Thus, the
non-affected leg produced more force in unilateral than
bilateral modes at pre (P = 0.01) and post (P = 0.004)
training. Force of the affected leg was similar across
modes.
Table 2 Isometric and isokinetic knee extension torque (Nm) pre and post training
Affected leg Non-affected leg
Pre Post Δ% Pre Post Δ%
Isometric torqueb 135 ± 34 138 ± 39 2 195 ± 41# 187 ± 35# -4
b, c # #
CON torque at 30°/s 113 ± 29 120 ± 32 6 147 ± 33 144 ± 37 -2
CON torque at 60°/sb, c
99 ± 28 102 ± 32 3 123 ± 42# 131 ± 40# 6
b, c # #
CON torque at 90°/s 86 ± 26 88 ± 34 2 111 ± 46 115 ± 50 4
ECC torque at 30°/sb 144 ± 40 149 ± 40 3 171 ± 36# 172 ± 35# 1
a b # #
ECC torque at 60°/s 143 ± 41 154 ± 45* 8 178 ± 40 175 ± 37 -2
ECC torque at 90°/sa b 141 ± 36 151 ± 39* 7 173 ± 36# 174 ± 36# 1
a b c
CON; concentric, ECC; eccentric. Significant main effects (P <0.05); interaction leg x time; main effect of leg; main effect of speed; Significant simple effects
(P <0.05); *vs. pre value within a leg; #vs. affected leg for a time point.
Figure 3 Concentric (CON) and eccentric (ECC) leg press peak power (W) of the affected and non-affected limbs (A), and isometric force in
the leg press at 90° (B) and 120° (C) knee angle for the affected and non-affected leg during unilateral and bilateral tests performed pre and
post training. Significant main effects (P <0.05); a = interaction time x leg, b = interaction time x muscle action, c = interaction leg x mode, d = main
effect of time, e = main effect of leg, f = main effect of mode. Significant simple effects (P <0.05); *vs. Pre within a leg; #vs. affected leg; §vs. bilateral mode
within a leg and time point.
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 7 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
Table 3 Balance, gait, functional performance and accompanied by an increase of nearly the same magnitude
perceived participation pre and post training in the untrained non-affected leg. Such cross-education ef-
Pre Post fect has previously been reported in stroke patients sub-
Berg Balance Scale (a.u.) 48.5 ± 8.7 51.7 ± 6.4* jected to RE employing ECC actions only [17], inferring
Timed Up-and-Go (s) 16.9 ± 9.1 14.1 ± 7.3* RE favoring ECC actions prompts important central ner-
vous system adaptations [35]. In support, cortical activity
6-minute Walk Test (m) 292.9 ± 144.5 295.3 ± 146.8
is greater during ECC than CON actions [36]. Hence,
30-second Chair-Stand (reps) 8.5 ± 3.5 9.9 ± 4.6*
neural signaling evoked by ECC exercise, and perhaps
Modified Ashworth Scale (a.u.) 0.77 ± 0.54 0.88 ± 0.55 ECC-overload flywheel RE even more so, may reinforce
Stroke Impact Scale (a.u.) 62.2 ± 14.5 66.0 ± 12.8§ certain neural strategies due to the variable velocity, and
a.u.: arbitrary units, s: seconds, m: meter, reps: repetitions. Significant differences: accelerating and decelerating coupled CON-ECC muscle
*vs. Pre (P <0.05); §at the limit of statistical significance vs. Pre (P = 0.058). actions, executed at maximal effort [37]. In support, ECC-
overload flywheel RE elicited more prominent neural ad-
aptations than constant load CON-ECC RE training in
physically active chronic stroke patients (2-17 years post healthy individuals [24]. Altogether, the specific fea-
stroke). Patients complying with the 8-week intervention tures of the current exercise modality appear to facili-
showed marked gains in muscle power of the trained af- tate more favorable stimulus than traditional constant
fected, but of the untrained non-affected limb as well. load or velocity (i.e., isokinetic) RE training paradigms,
Also, there were increases in isometric leg press force because of the emphasis on stretch-shortening cycle
and isokinetic ECC, not CON, knee extension torque, and stretch reflex, resulting in increased afferent traffic
accompanied by improved balance and functional per- and proprioception, and/or the unique motor unit re-
formance without exaggerating spasticity. Thus, the cruitment strategy typical of ECC actions. Indeed, the
results of this investigation suggest that short-term current resistance exercise paradigm seems to induce
ECC-overload flywheel RE training is a valid, safe and greater cross-education adaptations than more trad-
viable method to improve muscle function, balance, gait itional training protocols [17,38].
and functional performance in men and women suffering Isometric leg press force was higher, and increases in
from stroke. response to training greater, at 120 than 90° knee angle,
The ECC-overload flywheel RE training was well re- suggesting stroke patients not only exhibit more weak-
ceived by chronic patients, as indicated by the overall ness in the innermost part of the range of motion of a
37% increase in peak power across sessions (Figure 2), joint [4], but are also less prone to benefit from the exer-
without exacerbating spasticity. Despite the low vol- cise stimulus imposed in that particular range of motion.
ume or exercise dose carried out in each training The overall increase in leg press force for the paretic
session, i.e., 28 coupled CON-ECC actions equivalent limb amounted to 10-20%. Neither limb showed in-
to <1 min of contractile activity, power and balance im- creased isometric knee extension torque post training.
provements induced by the current intervention were This finding concerts the principle of training specificity
robust and comparable to those achieved after more ex- suggesting the transfer effect is most evident in func-
tended (i.e., 12 weeks) training [11,32] using conservative tional mode(s) mimicking the particular exercise exe-
methods employing either isokinetic or gravity dependent cuted during training [39].
loading. Thus, unique features characteristic of the exer- Bilateral maximal voluntary force deficits, such that
cise training paradigm used here and elsewhere [19-24], the summed force produced by each limb alone exceeds
allowing for brief episodes of ECC-overload, unrestricted force in a bilateral action, are well documented in
CON force of any action through the entire range of healthy individuals. In the current investigation, bilateral
motion, variable velocity, and call for acceleration and asymmetry was evident for the non-affected leg (<15%
deceleration of each coupled CON-ECC action, appear to force in the bilateral action), both pre and post training,
reinforce the positive effects of RE, beyond what has been and regardless of knee angle. This observation is consist-
noted in stroke patients subjected to more conservative ent with the report of McQuade et al. [40], noting bilat-
RE methods [11,32]. eral asymmetries in the non-paretic m. biceps brachii of
As muscle power, more so than strength, correlates stroke patients executing isometric elbow flexions, yet
with physical performance in individuals showing re- contrasts reports showing bilateral asymmetries of the
stricted mobility [33,34], rehabilitation programs pre- affected leg only [41] or both legs [42], when subjected
scribed to stroke patients with obvious gait deficits, to lower limb isometric actions. While ample evidence
should target muscle power as a primary outcome. Inter- suggests neural factors are responsible for these deficits
estingly, the marked increase in peak power of the [43,44], inconsistencies in outcome across the above
trained affected leg after the current intervention was studies remain to be explored, e.g., time since stroke,
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 8 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
severity of impairment, and muscle specific recruitment spasticity. Future research employing ECC-overload fly-
of neural pathways. wheel RE warrants investigations comprising more severely
Balance, a critical asset in any upright position with injured stroke victims, as well as control individuals, to af-
obvious impact on quality of life [45,46] and physical firm the applicability of this novel exercise rehabilitation
performance in daily activities [47], is typically impaired paradigm to a broader range of men and women suffering
after stroke. The current low-volume, high-load RE from stroke.
protocol induced early significantly enhanced balance,
assessed by means of BBS. Yet, only one patient attained Conclusions
the proposed limit for minimal clinically significant The current 8-week flywheel RE paradigm, prescribed
difference for the elderly, i.e., an 8-point increment to stroke patients, facilitated robust increases in muscle
[48]. It is worth noting that patients presenting lower strength and power of the affected trained limb, as well
BBS scores before training experienced the most sub- as improved power of the non-affected untrained leg.
stantial improvement in balance. Thus, while five pa- These adaptations were accompanied by significantly en-
tients displayed scores ≤45 (range 28-45), indicating hanced balance, gait and functional performance. While
increased risk of fall [49] prior to training, only one this particular iso-inertial exercise insult allows for unre-
patient appeared to be at risk after the intervention stricted force through the entire range of motion of any
(BBS score 34). Even though the current method asses- performed CON muscle action, it also offers brief epi-
sing balance, i.e., BBS, may have allowed for a “ceiling sodes of ECC-overload. Our novel exercise paradigm ap-
effect” in some patients, it remains the novel exercise pears to present a safe, viable and highly effective method
intervention employed here, improved balance in stroke to improve skeletal muscle function, and performance in
patients. daily living activities, in individuals suffering from chronic
The current training paradigm also improved 30CST stroke.
and TUG performance. Changes in 30CST between 2.0
and 2.6 are associated with improvements corresponding Competing interests
to minimum clinically important difference [50]. In the The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
present study, increases between 2 and 6 suggest 6 pa-
tients exhibited clinically important improvements. TUG Authors’ contributions
scores between 0.8 and 1.4 sec infer major improvement PS, RF-G and PAT designed the study protocol. PS managed and coordinated
the study. CN and BÅ assisted with subject recruitment and, conducted and
[50]. In the present study, 9 patients showed enhanced supervised training sessions. RF-G, CN and BÅ performed tests and data
TUG performance by 1 to 13 sec, indicating major sig- acquisition. RF-G performed data analysis. RF-G, PAT and PS drafted the
nificant clinical improvement. manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final version of the
manuscript.
Walking distance, as reflected in the 6MWT, was un-
changed. While our exercise regime did not intend to Acknowledgments
improve walking, some reports have inferred a causal re- This study was supported by grants from the European Space Agency (ESA;
lationship between muscle strength and walking capacity MAP Project AO-2004-032: PS and PAT), the T-Ö Stiftelsen (1301; RF-G) and
the STROKE-Riksförbundets (RF-G).
[51,52], or that RE may serve to improve comfortable
gait speed and total distance walked [53]. It is worth Author details
1
recalling that whereas use of the hip flexors is critical for Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, 171 77
Stockholm, Sweden. 2Östersund Rehabcentrum Remonthagen, Östersund,
walking in stroke patients [51], involvement of this Sweden. 3Department of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Östersund,
muscle group was not emphasized with the current RE Sweden.
paradigm, which rather called for closed-chain, simul-
Received: 21 July 2014 Accepted: 20 October 2014
taneous knee- and hip extension. Further, given the par- Published: 30 October 2014
ticular exercise stimulus imposed in this investigation
(<2 min per week), patients were not anticipated to References
benefit in the 6MWT. Nevertheless, the RE paradigm 1. Kaste M, Skyhoj Olsen T, Orgogozo JM, Bogousslavsky J, Hacke W:
employed here enhanced TUG, an established mean Organization of stroke care: education, stroke units and rehabilitation.
Cerebrovasc Dis 2000, 10:1–11.
assessing gait performance after stroke [13,14]. Thus, 2. Chow JW, Stokic DS: Force control of quadriceps muscle is bilaterally
while features related to short-distance walking, like fast- impaired in subacute stroke. J Appl Physiol 2011, 111:1290–1295.
est self-selected speed were improved after ECC-overload 3. Clark DJ, Condliffe EG, Patten C: Activation impairment alters muscle
torque-velocity in the knee extensors of persons with post-stroke
RE training, additional exercise tasks are warranted to hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 2006, 117:2328–2337.
carry on walking over longer distances. 4. Hedlund M, Sojka P, Lundstrom R, Lindstrom B: Insufficient loading in
Conclusions from the current pilot study should con- stroke subjects during conventional resistance training. Adv Physiother
2012, 14:18–28.
sider that individuals examined comprised 12 chronic, 5. Stavric VA, McNair PJ: Optimizing muscle power after stroke: a cross-
yet low severity disabled stroke patients with minimal sectional study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012, 9:67.
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 9 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
6. Lundstrom E, Smits A, Terent A, Borg J: Time-course and determinants of 29. Bohannon RW, Smith MB: Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth
spasticity during the first six months following first-ever stroke. J Rehabil scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 1987, 67:206–207.
Med 2010, 42:296–301. 30. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ: The
7. Sommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK: Spasticity after stroke: an stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and
overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999, 30:2131–2140.
Rehabil 2012, 91:814–820. 31. Curran-Everett D: Multiple comparisons: philosophies and illustrations.
8. Hafer-Macko CE, Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Macko RF: Skeletal muscle Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000, 279:R1–R8.
changes after hemiparetic stroke and potential beneficial effects 32. Ouellette MM, LeBrasseur NK, Bean JF, Phillips E, Stein J, Frontera WR,
of exercise intervention strategies. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008, Fielding RA: High-intensity resistance training improves muscle
45:261–272. strength, self-reported function, and disability in long-term stroke
9. Morris SL, Dodd KJ, Morris ME: Outcomes of progressive resistance survivors. Stroke 2004, 35:1404–1409.
strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2004, 33. Bean JF, Kiely DK, Herman S, Leveille SG, Mizer K, Frontera WR, Fielding RA:
18:27–39. The relationship between leg power and physical performance in
10. Andersen LL, Zeeman P, Jørgensen JR, Bech-Pedersen DT, Sørensen J, mobility-limited older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002, 50:461–467.
Kjær M, Andersen JL: Effects of intensive physical rehabilitation on 34. Foldvari M, Clark M, Laviolette LC, Bernstein MA, Kaliton D, Castaneda C,
neuromuscular adaptations in adults with poststroke hemiparesis. Pu CT, Hausdorff JM, Fielding RA, Singh MA: Association of muscle power
J Strength Cond Res 2011, 25:2808–2817. with functional status in community-dwelling elderly women. J Gerontol
11. Weiss A, Suzuki T, Bean J, Fielding RA: High intensity strength training A Biol Sci Med Sci 2000, 55:M192–M199.
improves strength and functional performance after stroke. Am J Phys 35. Hortobagyi T, Lambert NJ, Hill JP: Greater cross education following
Med Rehabil 2000, 79:369–376. quiz 391-364. training with muscle lengthening than shortening. Med Sci Sports Exerc
12. Bourbonnais D, Bilodeau S, Lepage Y, Beaudoin N, Gravel D, Forget R: 1997, 29:107–112.
Effect of force-feedback treatments in patients with chronic motor 36. Fang Y, Siemionow V, Sahgal V, Xiong F, Yue GH: Distinct brain activation
deficits after a stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 81:890–897. patterns for human maximal voluntary eccentric and concentric muscle
13. Flansbjer UB, Miller M, Downham D, Lexell J: Progressive resistance actions. Brain Res 2004, 1023:200–212.
training after stroke: effects on muscle strength, muscle tone, gait 37. Guilhem G, Cornu C, Guevel A: Neuromuscular and muscle-tendon system
performance and perceived participation. J Rehabil Med 2008, adaptations to isotonic and isokinetic eccentric exercise. Ann Phys Rehabil
40:42–48. Med 2010, 53:319–341.
14. Flansbjer UB, Lexell J, Brogardh C: Long-term benefits of progressive 38. Munn J, Herbert RD, Gandevia SC: Contralateral effects of unilateral
resistance training in chronic stroke: a 4-year follow-up. J Rehabil Med resistance training: a meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol 2004, 96:1861–1866.
2012, 44:218–221. 39. Hakkinen K, Komi PV: Training-induced changes in neuromuscular
15. Ryan AS, Buscemi A, Forrester L, Hafer-Macko CE, Ivey FM: Atrophy and performance under voluntary and reflex conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol
intramuscular fat in specific muscles of the thigh: associated weakness Occup Physiol 1986, 55:147–155.
and hyperinsulinemia in stroke survivors. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011, 40. McQuade K, Harris-Love ML, Whitall J: Maximal voluntary isometric elbow
25:865–872. flexion force during unilateral versus bilateral contractions in individuals
16. Tesch PA, Dudley GA, Duvoisin MR, Hather BM, Harris RT: Force and EMG with chronic stroke. J Appl Biomech 2008, 24:69–74.
signal patterns during repeated bouts of concentric or eccentric muscle 41. Simon AM, Kelly BM, Ferris DP: Sense of effort determines lower limb
actions. Acta Physiol Scand 1990, 138:263–271. force production during dynamic movement in individuals with
17. Clark DJ, Patten C: Eccentric versus concentric resistance training to poststroke hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009, 23:811–818.
enhance neuromuscular activation and walking speed following stroke. 42. Li S, Latash ML, Yue GH, Siemionow V, Sahgal V: The effects of stroke and
Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013, 27:335–344. age on finger interaction in multi-finger force production tasks. Clin
18. Patten C, Lexell J, Brown HE: Weakness and strength training in persons Neurophysiol 2003, 114:1646–1655.
with poststroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J Rehabil Res 43. Simon AM, Ferris DP: Lower limb force production and bilateral
Dev 2004, 41:293–312. force asymmetries are based on sense of effort. Exp Brain Res 2008,
19. Berg HE, Tesch A: A gravity-independent ergometer to be used 187:129–138.
for resistance training in space. Aviat Space Environ Med 1994, 44. Van Dieen JH, Ogita F, De Haan A: Reduced neural drive in bilateral
65:752–756. exertions: a performance-limiting factor? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003,
20. Tesch PA, Ekberg A, Lindquist DM, Trieschmann JT: Muscle hypertrophy 35:111–118.
following 5-week resistance training using a non-gravity-dependent 45. Garland SJ, Ivanova TD, Mochizuki G: Recovery of standing balance and
exercise system. Acta Physiol Scand 2004, 180:89–98. health-related quality of life after mild or moderately severe stroke. Arch
21. Alkner BA, Tesch PA: Knee extensor and plantar flexor muscle size and Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 88:218–227.
function following 90 days of bed rest with or without resistance 46. Schmid AA, Van Puymbroeck M, Altenburger PA, Miller KK, Combs SA,
exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004, 93:294–305. Page SJ: Balance is associated with quality of life in chronic stroke. Top
22. Tesch PA, Trieschmann JT, Ekberg A: Hypertrophy of chronically Stroke Rehabil 2013, 20:340–346.
unloaded muscle subjected to resistance exercise. J Appl Physiol 47. Hyndman D, Ashburn A, Stack E: Fall events among people with stroke
2004, 96:1451–1458. living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of
23. Norrbrand L, Fluckey JD, Pozzo M, Tesch PA: Resistance training using fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:165–170.
eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle size. 48. Conradsson M, Lundin-Olsson L, Lindelof N, Littbrand H, Malmqvist L,
Eur J Appl Physiol 2008, 102:271–281. Gustafson Y, Rosendahl E: Berg balance scale: intrarater test-retest
24. Norrbrand L, Pozzo M, Tesch PA: Flywheel resistance training calls for reliability among older people dependent in activities of daily living
greater eccentric muscle activation than weight training. Eur J Appl and living in residential care facilities. Phys Ther 2007, 87:1155–1163.
Physiol 2010, 110:997–1005. 49. Muir SW, Berg K, Chesworth B, Speechley M: Use of the Berg Balance Scale
25. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI: The Balance Scale: reliability for predicting multiple falls in community-dwelling elderly people:
assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. a prospective study. Phys Ther 2008, 88:449–459.
Scand J Rehabil Med 1995, 27:27–36. 50. Bennell K, Dobson F, Hinman R: Measures of physical performance
26. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S: The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic assessments: Self-Paced Walk Test (SPWT), Stair Climb Test (SCT), Six-
functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991, Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Chair Stand Test (CST), Timed Up & Go (TUG),
39:142–148. Sock Test, Lift and Carry Test (LCT), and Car Task. Arthritis Care Res 2011,
27. Enright PL: The six-minute walk test. Respir Care 2003, 48:783–785. 63(Suppl 11):S350–S370.
28. Jones CJ, Rikli RE, Beam WC: A 30-s chair-stand test as a measure of lower 51. Moriello C, Finch L, Mayo NE: Relationship between muscle strength and
body strength in community-residing older adults. Res Q Exerc Sport 1999, functional walking capacity among people with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev
70:113–119. 2011, 48:267–275.
Fernandez-Gonzalo et al. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2014, 11:150 Page 10 of 10
http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/11/1/150
doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-150
Cite this article as: Fernandez-Gonzalo et al.: Chronic stroke patients
show early and robust improvements in muscle and functional
performance in response to eccentric-overload flywheel resistance
training: a pilot study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
2014 11:150.