Gabriela Saldanha and Sharon O'Brien - Research Methodologies in Translation Studies
Gabriela Saldanha and Sharon O'Brien - Research Methodologies in Translation Studies
Gabriela Saldanha and Sharon O'Brien - Research Methodologies in Translation Studies
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303600726
CITATIONS READS
0 467
1 author:
Federico Zanettin
Università degli Studi di Perugia
25 PUBLICATIONS 221 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Federico Zanettin on 30 June 2016.
Book Review
Chapter 3 deals with translation product research, that is, research on the
linguistic content of translated texts. It focuses on two empirical approaches
which have informed many studies, that is, Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
and Corpus Linguistics (CL), which privilege a qualitative and a quantitative
approach to the data, respectively. After introducing CDA and CL and their use
in translation studies, the chapter looks at the advantages and limitations of the
two approaches, both of which usually rely on systemic functional grammar as
their “linguistic toolkit”. Basic corpus linguistics techniques are explained, and
their application to translation studies in a critical discourse analysis perspective
is discussed. The last part of this chapter provides a broad coverage of multiple
models of quality assessment (QA), as an attempt to bring some order and co-
herence in the multiplicity of models available. The discussion of QA is rather
comprehensive, especially as regards methods used for the evaluation of ma-
chine translation output, and readers are directed to other sources for further
discussion.
Chapter 4 is dedicated to translation process research, and focuses on the
most common methods used to investigate the mental processes, i.e. verbal re-
ports, which include introspective methods such as Think-Aloud-Protocols
(TAPs, still the main methodology in translation-process studies), keystroke
logging and eye tracking. Other methods, such as screen and audio recordings,
ethnographic studies, personality profiling and various types of psychological
measurements are also included in the discussion. The authors provide a re-
search overview, which includes studies on cognitive processes, with reference
to working rhythm and concurring activities, processing effort, creativity and
competence, the latter usually with a pedagogical focus. The main issues in
process research are examined under the headings of design, data elicitation,
analysis and reporting, stressing that all measurements are ultimately indirect.
The authors point to some inconsistencies in how different groups of partici-
pants (e.g. professionals, experts, semi-professionals, novices) have been de-
fined in the literature and explain relevant criteria in the design of translation
process research, including issues of participants selection, task description and
elicitation techniques. They also discuss problems related to the definition of a
unit of analysis in process research, either in textual/linguistic or temporal
terms, and ways of assessing the significance of such units using statistical
techniques. This chapter underlines that research on the process of translation
should be combined with both product- and context-oriented research, using
both qualitative and quantitative methods and triangulating the results, and cor-
relating findings with quality assessment.
Chapter 5 presents the third major grouping of research methods, those in-
volving research regarding the human agents in the translation activity. The au-
thors consider various factors which may be relevant in designing participant-
oriented research, and which involve the collection of data using questionnaires,
interviews and focus groups. After considering the various types and structures
of questionnaires and interviews and weighing their respective pros and cons,
the authors discuss a number of issues related to good practice. These include
the language used, the way participants are selected and the way data are elic-
ited, how the analysis is conducted, and ethical issues. This chapter also deals at
some length with qualitative and quantitative methods of analysis. While quali-
tative analysis is explained mostly with reference to interviews and quantitative
analysis with reference to questionnaires, the methodological aspects described
are also relevant and applicable to, for instance, the qualitative analysis of au-
dio/video recorded dialogue from interpreting sessions and to statistical testing
in corpus-based approaches, respectively. This chapter concludes with a section
of mixed quantitative and qualitative approaches for data validation and triangu-
lation.
Chapter 6 deals with research carried out within conceptual frameworks
and through methodological procedures derived from cultural studies, sociol-
ogy, and ethnography. This type of studies is not identified by a specific meth-
odology, but rather by the engaged, political nature of the investigation, which
explores the cultural, social and political factors influencing the specific (trans-
lational) phenomenon under analysis. The most common type of research
method used in this area is the case study, defined as a unique unit of investiga-
tion and a real life phenomenon in relation with its wider context. After sketch-
ing out a typology of case studies, including extreme, deviant, crucial, critical,
revelatory and typical cases, the authors argue that, given the variety of this type
of research, no single methodology is most appropriate. However, some general
principles are outlined, such as the need to follow disciplined practice, to avoid
bias by selecting multiple sources of information and to triangulate results. The
authors highlight that case studies are optimally indicated for exploring ques-
tions, generating hypotheses and testing the viability of theoretical frameworks.
Research based on case studies, like all qualitative research, is an iterative proc-
ess: it does not keep to a linear pattern from data collection to analysis but
rather data collection and analysis are done simultaneously, following an induc-
tive approach which may lead to a reconsideration of the research design. Case
studies are based on evidence that is rarely fully coherent, and therefore it is
important to be flexible and be ready to apply theoretical models to the case at
hand rather than vice versa. While they can be very different and their results
are not usually replicable and generalizable, when case studies are based on a
clear methodology and on sound documentation, and offer a transparent discus-
sion of results, they provide transferable evidence. Thus, “it is important to
choose them carefully for their relevance, for the significance of the issues they
will raise, the hypotheses that they can help to formulate, their capacity to im-
prove on previous theories, and the insights they can provide into the complex
mechanisms through which social, political, cultural and ideological forces
shape translations and are shaped by them” (p. 233). The authors discuss vari-
ous research aids which may be used to systematically organize and analyze the
data, such as a database, a research diary, analytical memos and visual data dis-
plays. They also suggest a number of software applications for qualitative
analysis which can be used for managing and organizing the data, highlighting
both the advantages and the possible draw-backs of computer-aided analysis.
The last chapter illustrates the final step of research, which involves its
communication and dissemination, in particular though the publication of re-
search reports. The chapter is tightly structured: after a general introduction to
research report formats and standards, its main recurrent components (introduc-
tion, literature review and conclusions) are outlined. This is followed by a dis-
cussion of the type of methods used to report the research design, the collection
of the data, and the analytical approach adopted. The last three sections are each
devoted to an illustration of and suggestions about developing best practices for
reporting about qualitative, quantitative and linguistic data.
As would any attempt to organize and systematize a complex and interdis-
ciplinary field such as that of translation studies methodologies, the disciplinary
territory navigated by the volume is bound to have some gaps, overlaps, and un-
even levels of detail. The most apparent gaps, readily acknowledged by the au-
thors, are the areas of translation history and interpreting studies. Thus, re-
searchers working on, for instance, Renaissance translation, dialogue or confer-
ence interpreting, may be advised (and are directed by the authors) to refer to
additional and more specific methodological resources. Overlaps happen when,
for instance, in considering the various sources of data used in case studies
(Chapter 6), which include written texts (academic literature, translations,
paratexts, archives, etc.) as well as verbal reports, direct observation, physical
artefacts and quantitative data, the reader is directed to more in-depth discussion
in other chapters. However, the rationale behind the structure of the book is al-
ways clearly explained, in accordance with the methodological principles ex-
pounded. For example, while the section on quality assessment could possibly
have been placed in almost any chapter, its inclusion in the chapter on product
research is justified by the fact that most studies on QA are indeed done in this
research area. The central chapters (four and five), which focus on methodolo-
gies with clear procedural steps (e.g. keystroke logging, eye tracking, question-
naires and interviews), are illustrated in more detail than methodological ap-
proaches affording a wider scope, such as those of CDS and CL, and case stud-
ies. The level of detail reached in, for instance, the description of eye tracking
experiments is unparalleled elsewhere. When methodological, procedural and
technical features and aspects are less elaborated upon, the reader is clearly re-
ferred to studies which discuss those aspect more in depth, with a view to elabo-
rating on their respective advantages and limitations.
The choice of what to include, the consideration accorded to the material
and its systematization are, of course, always arbitrary, reflecting to some extent
the authors’ own research interests and expertise. As a whole, however, the vol-
ume is well planned and structured, with useful section and subsection break-
ups and cross references, making it easy for the reader to use for reference.
Since the methodologies described often come from other disciplines, including
sociology, linguistics and psychology, the sources cited range from ethnometh-
odological studies to computational linguistics, from cognitive psychology to
functional-systemic grammar, and include publications in languages such as
Spanish, French and German. The authors offer a wealth of good advice and de-
tailed instructions (or a mix of the two), as well as an emphasis on ethical con-
siderations and implications. To conclude, the volume is certainly an asset in the
bookshelf of the translation studies student, researcher, and scholar alike.
Federico Zanettin
Perugia, Italy
E-mail: federico.zanettin@unipg.it
References
Williams, J. & Chesterman, A. 2002. The Map – A Beginner’s Guide to Doing Research in Trans-
lation Studiens. Manchester, UK: St. Jerome.