Analysis

Chapter IV
Results
The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between Parenting Styles and Emotional
Intelligence in young adults. The study is conducted to find out a predictive relationship between
Parenting Styles and Emotional Intelligence in young adults. For this purpose, Pearson product movement
correlation was applied to find out the relationship between Parenting Styles and Emotional Intelligence
in young adults. Hierarchical regression analysis was applied to find the predictor in Parenting Styles and
Emotional Intelligence.
Table 4.1
Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Young Adults
Variables f (%)
Age
17 to 25 years 200 100
Gender
Male 101 50
Female 99 49
Family SS
Joint 102 51
Nuclear 98 49
Qualification
Graduate 157 78
Masters 41 20
Post Graduate 02 1
Residency
Rural 62 31
Urban 138 69
SES
Upper Class 32 16
Middle Class 168 84
Note: f= Frequency. *p< .05,**p< .01.
Table 4.1 shows descriptive statistics of the appropriate interpretation of sample
characteristics. Most of the participants were between the ages of 17-25 (f=200(100%)). 50%
Male participant’s and 49% female were in gender. Majority of participants have 51% joint
family system and 49% nuclear family system. (78%) graduate (20%) Masters and 49% post
graduates were found. (31%) Rural and (69%) Urban were available in the study. Upper classs
was 16%, Middle class was 84% showed in the analysis.
Table 4.2
Psychometric properties of Questionnaire (N=200)
Scale M SD Range α
Total Parenting 100.7 11.93 72.0 .72
Authoritative 26.97 4.17 25.0 .73
Authoritarian 24.92 4.57 25.0 .69
Permissive 26.0 4.23 24.0 .71
Uninvolved 26.8 5.48 27.0 .72
Total Emotional 76.64 18.52 90.0 .76
Self-Emotion App. 19.03 6.35 34.0 .82
Regulations Emotions 20.05 5.47 22.0 .83
Use of emotions 18.79 5.72 24.0 .82
Other Emotion App 18.76 5.60 24.0 .84
WLEIS 76.64 18.52 90.0 .76
Note: *p< .05,**p< .01.
Table: 4.2 revealed the Total Parenting Cronbach ά .72 (>.60) which indicates high
internal consistency, with a mean score M=100.7 (SD=11.93). It has a range of 11.93. In
Authoritative Cronbach ά .73 (>.50) which indicates high internal consistency, with a mean score
M=26.9 (SD=4.17). It has a range of 25.0. Authoritarian ά .87(>.69) which indicates high internal
consistency, with mean score M=24.92 (SD=4.57). It has a range of 25.0. Permissive ά .71(>.69)
which indicates high internal consistency, with mean score M=25.0(SD=26.0). It has a range of
24.0. Total Emotional ά .76(>.69) which indicates high internal consistency, with mean score
M=76.64(SD=18.52).
Table 4.3
T Test analysis of Parenting Styles and Emotional Intelligence in young adults (N=200)
Gender Group
Male Female
M SD M SD t P Cohen’s d
Total Parenting 100.5 11.32 100.98 12.59 -.23 .89 .34
Total Emotions 76.6 19.46 76.6 17.60 .01 .11 .73
*p<.05.
Table 4.3 revealed the finding that females showed higher scores on (M=100.98, 76.6)
(SD=12.59, 17.60) as compared to males (M=100.5, 76) and (SD=11.32, 19.46). There are
statistically significant differences at the .05 level of significance between Male and Female
Young Adults. Results showed that females had higher score than males adults.
Table 4.4
Family SS Group
Joint Nuclear
M SD n M SD n t P Cohen’s d
Total Parenting 101.9 12.26 102 99.55 11.51 97 1.41 1 .39 .34
Total Emotions 76.78 18.76 102 76.50 18.37 98 .10 .001 .73
*p<.05.
Table 4.4 revealed the Finding that family system showed higher scores on joint family
system (M=101.9, 76.78) (SD=12.26, 18.76) as compared to females from nuclear family system
(M=99.55, 76.50) (SD=11.51, 18.37). There are statistically significant differences at the .05
level of significance between joint and nuclear family system in Young Adults.
Table 4.5
SES Group
Upper Class Middle Class
M SD M SD t P Cohen’s d
Total Parenting 96 .84 10.69 101.57 11.88 -2.08 .13 .34
Total Emotions 76.03 19.90 76.6 18.30 -.20 .03 .73
*p<.05.
Table 4.5 revealed the Finding that Middle class showed higher scores on
(M=101.57,76.6) and (SD=11.88, 18.30) as compared to females from Upper Class (M=96.84,
76.03) and (SD=10.69, 19.90). There are statistically significant differences at the .05 level of
significance between Middle and Upper class in Young Adults

Table 4.6
Linear Regression Analysis of Parental Authority Questionnaire and Wong and Law Emotional
Intelligence Scale in Young Adults (N= 200)
Variables B SEB .β R2 P
Total Parenting .35 0.5 .22 .05 .001***
Note: P*<.05* p<.01**.

Results of regression analysis showed that Parenting Styles is the most significant predictors of
Emotional Intelligence, (R2= .05, P= .001) p<.01
4.1 Summary of Findings. Summary of the findings as follows:
 There is significant positive relationship between Parenting Styles and emotional intelligence.
 T-Test showed there is a significant gender difference in Males and Female.
 T-Test showed there is a significant Family System difference between Joint and Nuclear.
 T-Test showed there is a significant Socioeconomic Status difference between the Middle and
Upper Class.
 Parenting styles are significant predictors of Emotional Intelligence.

Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Chapter IV

Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Young Adults

Psychometric properties of Questionnaire (N=200)

Total Parenting 100.7 11.93 72.0 .72

Authoritative 26.97 4.17 25.0 .73

Authoritarian 24.92 4.57 25.0 .69

Permissive 26.0 4.23 24.0 .71

Uninvolved 26.8 5.48 27.0 .72

Total Emotional 76.64 18.52 90.0 .76

Self-Emotion App. 19.03 6.35 34.0 .82

Regulations Emotions 20.05 5.47 22.0 .83

Use of emotions 18.79 5.72 24.0 .82

Other Emotion App 18.76 5.60 24.0 .84

WLEIS 76.64 18.52 90.0 .76

Note: *p< .05,**p< .01.

Total Parenting 100.5 11.32 100.98 12.59 -.23 .89 .34

Total Emotions 76.6 19.46 76.6 17.60 .01 .11 .73

Upper Class Middle Class

Total Parenting 96 .84 10.69 101.57 11.88 -2.08 .13 .34

Total Emotions 76.03 19.90 76.6 18.30 -.20 .03 .73

significance between Middle and Upper class in Young Adults

Intelligence Scale in Young Adults (N= 200)

Total Parenting .35 0.5 .22 .05 .001***

Note: P*<.05* p<.01**.

Emotional Intelligence, (R2= .05, P= .001) p<.01

4.1 Summary of Findings. Summary of the findings as follows:

 T-Test showed there is a significant gender difference in Males and Female.

 Parenting styles are significant predictors of Emotional Intelligence.

You might also like

Note: P<.05 p<.01**.