Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Woods 2013cognitive Frilyt

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging©

Volume 17, Number 9, 2013

COMMENTARY

COGNITIVE FRAILTY: FRONTIERS AND CHALLENGES


A.J. WOODS, R.A. COHEN, M. PAHOR
Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, Institute on Aging, Cognitive Aging and Memory Clinical Translational Research Program, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Corresponding author: Adam J. Woods, PhD, Institute on Aging CTRB, Department of Aging and Geriatric Research, 2004 Mowry Road, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611,
Phone: 352-294-5842, Email: ajwoods@ufl.edu

An international consensus group comprised of investigators The term has often been used as a general descriptor for
from the International Academy of Nutrition and Aging cognitive impairment occurring as people reach advanced age.
(IANA) and the International Association of Gerontology and Sometimes cognitive frailty refers to cognitive disturbances or
Geriatrics (IAGG) recently convened in Toulouse, France to pre-dementia occurring in association with other medical
establish a definition for cognitive frailty in older adults. This conditions (9). However, Kelaiditi et al. state that cognitive
effort was motivated by growing awareness that many people frailty must be considered as being independent of dementia or
with physical frailty are also prone to cognitive problems. In pre-existing brain disorders (1). Accordingly, there seems to be
“Cognitive Frailty: Rationale and Definition” (1), an initial several different perspectives on the nature of cognitive frailty.
working definition was developed, and a framework proposed The fact that the construct is ambiguous and lacking a precise
for future studies of cognitive frailty. operational definition clearly reinforces the authors’ effort to
This group should be commended for addressing the establish a common language for future studies of cognitive
construct of cognitive frailty and an obvious gap in the clinical frailty.
gerontology literature. Physical frailty is a widely recognized An obvious question emerges: How is cognitive frailty
problem in the elderly. While age-associated cognitive different from cognitive reserve? Cognitive reserve refers to the
dysfunction has been studied for many years, for the most part capacity of a given individual to resist cognitive impairment or
it was not conceptualized in a manner that is consistent with decline. Educational level and prior cognitive abilities have
current definitions of physical frailty. In fact, cognition has been shown to be important determinants of cognitive reserve
typically not been conceptualized in this manner, and only (10-12). Cognitive reserve has been linked with resilience of
recently has the term cognitive frailty been employed. brain function and structure in the presence of disease, injury,
Rockwood et al published one of the first studies to examine or other factors that alter physiological functioning (13). While
factors associated with frailty in the elderly (2). Frailty was cognitive and brain reserve undoubtedly have some common
conceptualized as a multidimensional construct with both underpinnings, the relationship between these types of reserve
physical and cognitive origins. Panza et al. used the term is still not fully understood.
cognitive frailty in the title of their review of pre-dementia Kelaiditi et al maintain that “cognitive frailty is
syndrome vascular risk factors (3). In a subsequent paper, characterized by reduced cognitive reserve”. Accordingly,
Panza et al, attempted to specify different models of frailty in cognitive frailty could be viewed as simply the inverse of
pre-dementia and dementia syndrome (4). The prognostic cognitive reserve. The authors indicate that while cognitive
accuracy of frailty assessment inventories for mortality among reserve is an important element of cognitive frailty, it is also
hospitalized elderly people was examined subsequently, with dependent on the existence of physical frailty; i.e., “the
results suggesting that both cognitive and physical factors were simultaneous presence of both physical frailty and cognitive
important in predicting outcome (5). We reviewed 199 impairment”. They distinguish this category of older non-
manuscripts cited in PubMed in which cognitive frailty was demented adults from cognitive impairment in the absence of
mentioned in either the title or as a keyword. In the vast physical frailty. The importance of this categorization is that it
majority of these manuscripts, frailty was examined as a emphasizes an important and often under-recognized
manifestation of cognitive dysfunction. Only recently has relationship between systemic physical illness, brain
cognitive frailty itself become the focus of inquiry. dysfunction, and cognitive impairment. It is now well
The term cognitive frailty is attractive as it suggests a established that cognitive disturbances occur secondary to
parallel with physical frailty. The concept of physical frailty is various medical conditions, such as cardiovascular disease,
relatively well understood in the context of aging, and has been diabetes and HIV (14-19).
operationalized in studies conducted over the past two decades The value of excluding brain disorders from cognitive frailty
(6-8). However, as Kelaiditi et al. point out, the operational may be less well justified. By limiting cognitive frailty to
definition of physical frailty remains unresolved (1). The people with physical frailty, Kelaiditi et al create four discrete
situation is even more problematic for cognitive frailty, as past categories of older non-demented adults, which may have some
investigators have focused on a variety of different phenomena. clinical value. However, with respect to the concept of
Received July 20, 2013
Accepted for publication July 30, 2013
741
The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging©
Volume 17, Number 9, 2013

COGNITIVE FRAILTY: FRONTIERS AND CHALLENGES

cognitive frailty, there are many examples of people who are In sum, “Cognitive Frailty: Rationale and Definition” (1)
vulnerable to subsequent functional decline based on the provides a valuable starting point for the development of a
existence of subtle cognitive and/or brain abnormalities below coherent operational definition and for future studies of
the threshold for clinical detection. In fact, a major thrust of cognitive frailty. While closely linked to cognitive reserve, the
current research on neurodegenerative disease focuses on the construct of cognitive frailty goes beyond cognitive reserve,
discovery of vulnerability and early markers of future particularly because of its association with physical frailty and
functional decline. While physical disorders such as diabetes the fact that it often becomes evident in the context of acute
and cardiovascular risk factors contribute to this vulnerability, a physical illness. There seems to be considerable value in
variety of neurobiological and behavioral risk factors also exist distinguishing vulnerability to cognitive functional decline
that create functional vulnerability (20-22), and ultimately among people with or without physical frailty, though there is
cognitive frailty. In fact, excluding people with brain evidence that both cognitive and physical frailty share several
disturbances from the definition of cognitive frailty fails to common pathophysiologic mechanisms and risk factors.
account for the fact that the effects of physical illnesses are Growing and consistent epidemiologic evidence shows that
exacerbated by the existence of a neural predisposition to impaired physical performance, which is a component of
cognitive decline or prior brain disturbances that reduce physical frailty, measured with walking speed or the Short
cognitive reserve. Furthermore, people with physical frailty Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) (23), is independently
who develop cognitive frailty presumably do so as their brain associated with cognitive decline (24-36). The SPPB tests,
begins to develop neuropathological changes. Accordingly, including walking, balance and chair stands, require the
there is value in dichotomizing cognitive frailty between people complex interplay of sensory, cognitive, and motor functions.
with or without pre-existing brain dysfunction, or alternatively These systems may be altered early in the path to cognitive
treating brain vulnerability as a mediator of the effects of decline (36, 37), and possibly to cognitive frailty. Low walking
physical illness on cognitive frailty. speed and low SPPB score are also associated with elevated
Defining cognitive frailty depends on determining its inflammatory cytokines and low Brain-Derived Natirurectic
diagnostic criteria. Other than physical frailty, the primary Factor (BDNF) (38-40), all of which are predictors of cognitive
criteria proposed by Kelaiditi et al. is the presence of mild decline (41, 42).
cognitive impairment as defined by a clinical dementia rating Future research is needed to determine how phenotypic
(CDR) score of 0.5, without Alzheimer’s disease or another differences among people and the existence of a wide variety of
progressive brain disturbance that would lead to dementia. preexisting manifestations of brain structure and function affect
Using these criteria, it is not clear whether people with this vulnerability. Following the expert consensus, prospective
cerebrovascular disturbances would meet these criteria or not. studies will be needed to assess the reliability and predictive
The authors make a point of also noting that “under different validity of the operational measure of cognitive frailty. We laud
circumstances cognitive frailty may also represent a precursor the efforts of the IANA/IAGG consensus group in laying the
of neurodegenerative processes”. This is a critical point that foundation for the emerging concept of cognitive frailty and
reinforces the need to go beyond the definition of cognitive strongly encourage future studies aimed at advancing this
frailty as occurring in the absence of brain dysfunction. It is clinical domain.
also likely that a CDR = 0.5 is too narrow to fully capture the
heterogeneity of cognitive frailty. For example, people without References
cognitive impairment that rises to the level of a CDR= 0.5 may
still be vulnerable to functional decline under certain 1. Kelaiditi E, Cesari M, Canevelli M, van Kan GA, Ouset P, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Ritz

conditions. This occurs commonly during hospitalization, in


P, Duveau F, Soto ME, Provencher V, Nourhashemi F, Salva A, Robert P, Andrieu S,
Rolland Y, Touchon J, Fitten, Vellas B (2013) Cognitive Frailty: Rational and
response to extreme stress, or to changes in the physical definition from an (I.A.N.A./I.A.G.G.) International Consensus Group. J Nutr Health
environment in the elderly. 2.
Aging 2013;9:726-734.
Rockwood K, Stolee P, McDowell I (1996) Factors associated with
In fact, it is the vulnerability to alterations in cognitive institutionalization of older people in Canada: testing a multifactorial definition of
function under such conditions that may be the essential frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc 44(5):578-582.

determinant of cognitive frailty. There are many people in


3. Panza F, D'Introno A, Colacicco AM, et al (2006) Cognitive frailty: Predementia
syndrome and vascular risk factors. Neurobiol Aging 27(7):933-940.
society with cognitive limitations who would not be considered 4. Panza F, Solfrizzi V, Frisardi V, et al (2011) Different models of frailty in

to be frail, unless they exhibit a tendency to functionally


predementia and dementia syndromes. J Nutr Health Aging 15(8):711-719.
5. Pilotto A, Rengo F, Marchionni N, et al (2012) Comparing the prognostic accuracy
decompensate when their resources are challenged. The key to for all-cause mortality of frailty instruments: a multicentre 1-year follow-up in
operationalizing cognitive frailty may ultimately depend of 6.
hospitalized older patients. PLoS One. 7(1):e29090.
Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Houles M, Gillette-Guyonnet S, Soto M, Vellas B
developing diagnostic challenges that would enable clinicians (2010) The assessment of frailty in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med 26(2):275-286.
to determine this tendency. This will depend on determining 7. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, et al (2009) Gait speed at usual pace as a

which neurocognitive measures are most useful for detecting


predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people an International
Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health Aging
this vulnerability and for assessing the severity of cognitive 13(10):881-889.

frailty.
8. Abellan van Kan G, Rolland Y, Bergman H, Morley JE, Kritchevsky SB, Vellas B
(2008) The I.A.N.A Task Force on frailty assessment of older people in clinical

742
The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging©
Volume 17, Number 9, 2013

JNHA: COGNITIVE FRAILTY

practice. J Nutr Health Aging 12(1):29-37. 28. Deshpande N, Metter EJ, Bandinelli S, Guralnik J, Ferrucci L. Gait speed under
9. Chouliara Z, Kearney N, Stott D, Molassiotis A, Miller M (2004) Perceptions of varied challenges and cognitive decline in older persons: a prospective study. Age
older people with cancer of information, decision making and treatment: a systematic Ageing 2009; 38(5):509-514.
review of selected literature. Ann Oncol 15(11):1596-1602. 29. Rosano C, Simonsick EM, Harris TB, Kritchevsky SB, Brach J, Visser M, Yaffe K,
10. Satz P, Morgenstern H, Miller EN, et al (1993) Low education as a possible risk Newman AB (2005) Association between physical and cognitive function in healthy
factor for cognitive abnormalities in HIV-1: findings from the multicenter AIDS elderly: the health, aging and body composition study. Neuroepidemiology 24(1-2):8-
Cohort Study (MACS). J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 6(5):503-511. 14.
11. Stern Y (2002) What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the 30. Soumare A, Tavernier B, Alperovitch A, Tzourio C, Elbaz A (2009) A cross-
reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8(3):448-460. sectional and longitudinal study of the relationship between walking speed and
12. Stern Y, Albert S, Tang MX, Tsai WY (1999) Rate of memory decline in AD is cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med
related to education and occupation: cognitive reserve? Neurology 53(9):1942-1947. Sci 64(10):1058-1065.
13. Satz P, Cole MA, Hardy DJ, Rassovsky Y (2011) Brain and cognitive reserve: 31. Abellan Van KG, Rolland Y, Andrieu S, Bauer J, Beauchet O, et al (2009) Gait speed
mediator(s) and construct validity, a critique. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 33(1):121- at usual pace as a predictor of adverse outcomes in community-dwelling older people
130. an International Academy on Nutrition and Aging (IANA) Task Force. J Nutr Health
14. Okonkwo OC, Cohen RA, Gunstad J, Tremont G, Alosco ML, Poppas A (2010) Aging 13(10):881-889.
Longitudinal trajectories of cognitive decline among older adults with cardiovascular 32. Wang L, Larson EB, Bowen JD, van BG (2006) Performance-based physical
disease. Cerebrovasc Dis 30(4):362-373. function and future dementia in older people. Arch Intern Med 166(10):1115-1120.
15. Cohen RA, Poppas A, Forman DE, et al (2009) Vascular and cognitive functions 33. Hajjar I, Yang F, Sorond F, Jones RN, Milberg W, Cupples LA, Lipsitz LA (2009) A
associated with cardiovascular disease in the elderly. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol novel aging phenotype of slow gait, impaired executive function, and depressive
31(1):96-110. symptoms: relationship to blood pressure and other cardiovascular risks. J Gerontol
16. Gunstad J, Cohen RA, Paul RH, Tate DF, Hoth KF, Poppas A (2006) Understanding A Biol Sci Med Sci 64(9):994-1001.
reported cognitive dysfunction in older adults with cardiovascular disease. 34. Zimmermann LJ, Ferrucci L, Kiang L, Lu T, Guralnik JM, Criqui MH, Yihua L,
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2(2):213-218. McDermott MM (2011) Poorer clock draw test scores are associated with greater
17. Devlin KN, Gongvatana A, Clark US, et al (2012) Neurocognitive effects of HIV, functional impairment in peripheral artery disease: the Walking and Leg Circulation
hepatitis C, and substance use history. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 18(1):68-78. Study II. Vasc Med 16(3):173-181.
18. Cohen RA, de la Monte S, Gongvatana A, et al (2011) Plasma cytokine 35. Verghese J, Robbins M, Holtzer R, Zimmerman M, Wang C, Xue X, Lipton RB
concentrations associated with HIV/hepatitis C coinfection are related to attention, (2008) Gait dysfunction in mild cognitive impairment syndromes. J Am Geriatr Soc
executive and psychomotor functioning. J Neuroimmunol 233(1-2):204-210. 56(7):1244-1251.
19. Cohen RA, Harezlak J, Schifitto G, et al (2010) Effects of nadir CD4 count and 36. Verghese J, Wang C, Lipton RB, Holtzer R, Xue X (2007) Quantitative gait
duration of human immunodeficiency virus infection on brain volumes in the highly dysfunction and risk of cognitive decline and dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg
active antiretroviral therapy era. J Neurovirol 16(1):25-32. Psychiatry 78(9):929-935.
20. Elie M, Cole MG, Primeau FJ, Bellavance F (1998) Delirium risk factors in elderly 37. Buchman AS, Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Tang Y, Bennett DA (2007) Frailty is
hospitalized patients. J Gen Intern Med 13(3):204-212. associated with incident Alzheimer's disease and cognitive decline in the elderly.
21. Robertsson B, Blennow K, Gottfries CG, Wallin A (1998) Delirium in dementia. Int J Psychosom Med 69(5):483-489.
Geriatr Psychiatry 13(1):49-56. 38. Brinkley TE, Leng X, Miller ME, Kitzman DW, Pahor M, Berry MJ, Marsh AP,
22. Woods AJ, Mark VW, Pitts AC, Mennemeier M (2011) Pervasive cognitive Kritchevsky SB, Nicklas BJ (2009) Chronic inflammation is associated with low
impairment in acute rehabilitation inpatients without brain injury. PM R 3(5):426- physical function in older adults across multiple comorbidities. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
432. Med Sci 64(4):455-461.
23. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Simonsick EM, Salive ME, Wallace RB (1995) Lower- 39. Hsu FC, Kritchevsky SB, Liu Y, Kanaya A, Newman AB, Perry SE, Visser M, Pahor
extremity function in persons over the age of 70 years as a predictor of subsequent M, Harris TB, Nicklas BJ (2009) Association Between Inflammatory Components
disability. N Engl J Med 332(9):556-561. and Physical Function in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study: A
24. Camargo EC, Beiser A, Tan ZS et al (2012) Walking Speed, Handgrip Strength and Principal Component Analysis Approach. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 64(5):581-
Risk of Dementia and Stroke: The Framingham Offspring Study. American Academy 589.
of Neurology, 64th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April 21-28, 2012. 40. Scalzo P, Kummer A, Bretas TL, Cardoso F, Teixeira AL (2010) Serum levels of
25. Dodge HH, Mattek NC, Austin D, Hayes TL, Kaye JA (2012) In-home walking brain-derived neurotrophic factor correlate with motor impairment in Parkinson's
speeds and variability trajectories associated with mild cognitive impairment. disease. J Neurol 257(4):540-545.
Neurology 78(24):1946-1952. 41. Erickson KI, Prakash RS, Voss MW, Chaddock L, Heo S, McLaren M, Pence BD,
26. McGough EL, Kelly VE, Logsdon RG, McCurry SM, Cochrane BB, Engel JM, Teri Martin SA, Vieira VJ, Woods JA, McAuley E, Kramer AF (2010) Brain-derived
L (2011) Associations between physical performance and executive function in older neurotrophic factor is associated with age-related decline in hippocampal volume. J
adults with mild cognitive impairment: gait speed and the timed "up & go" test. Phys Neurosci 30(15):5368-5375.
Ther 91(8):1198-1207. 42. Yaffe K, Lindquist K, Penninx BW, Simonsick EM, Pahor M, Kritchevsky S, Launer
27. Fitzpatrick AL, Buchanan CK, Nahin RL, DeKosky ST, Atkinson HH, Carlson MC, L, Kuller L, Rubin S, Harris T (2003) Inflammatory markers and cognition in well-
Williamson JD (2007) Associations of gait speed and other measures of physical functioning African-American and white elders. Neurology 61(1):76-80.
function with cognition in a healthy cohort of elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci
Med Sci 62(11):1244-1251.

743

You might also like