The Art of Aeronautical Decision
The Art of Aeronautical Decision
The Art of Aeronautical Decision
Administration
Introduction
Chapter 3 Perceive
Chapter 4 Process
Chapter 5 Perform
Review
Exam
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
1
Introduction
This course offers a practical framework to help you develop this vital pilot skill and use
it to stay safe in all of your flying activities. After completing the course, you will be
able to explain the 3-P model and apply it to flight scenarios that appear in Chapter7.
At the end of the course is a short quiz drawn primarily from these scenarios. The point
of the quiz is to give you a chance to practice applying the 3-P model to flight scenarios.
Just as in the real world, there may not always be a single “right” answer to quiz
questions. If your answer differs from the official "right" answer, you may want to
discuss some of the questions and answers with a flight instructor or another pilot. The
most important thing is to understand how, and why, you reached the answer you
provided.
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
2
Aeronautical Skills
To fly an airplane safely, you need three sets of separate, but related, skills.
ADM Defined
So what exactly is ADM? In AC 60-22, the FAA defines ADM as a
Although this sentence provides a good description of the ADM process, you may be
asking yourself how to translate this formal definition into practices that you can easily
use in real world flying. Let’s take a look at one approach.
The next few chapters will describe how you put each of these steps into practice.
Chapter 3 – Perceive
To navigate to a particular destination, the first step is to determine exactly where you
are right now. The same principle applies in ADM: to navigate to a safe outcome, you
first need to understand the “given set of circumstances” you face.
The first step in the 3-P model, PER CEI VE , is about developing a clear and
comprehensive awareness of your particular situation. Consider:
For each element, ask “what could hurt me, my passengers, or my aircraft?”
All four elements combine and interact to create a unique situation for any flight. Pay
special attention to the pilot-aircraft combination, and consider whether the combined
“pilot-aircraft team” is capable of the mission you want to fly. For example, you may be
a very experienced and proficient pilot, but your weather flying ability is still limited if
you are flying a 1970s-model aircraft with no weather avoidance gear. On the other
hand, you may have a new technically advanced aircraft with moving map GPS, weather
datalink, and autopilot – but if you do not have much weather flying experience or
practice in using this kind of equipment, you cannot rely on the airplane’s capability to
compensate for your own lack of experience.
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
5
Chapter 4 – Process
Evaluate with CARE
Next, you mentally PROCESS information about the circumstances that you have
identified. The goal is to evaluate their impact on the safety of your flight, and consider
“why must I CARE about these circumstances?”
For each hazard that you perceived in step one, process with CARE. Example: for a
night flight to attend a business meeting:
A good rule of thumb for the processing phase: if you find yourself saying that it will
“probably” be okay, it is definitely time for a solid reality check.
If you are worried about missing a meeting, be realistic about how that pressure will
affect not just your initial go/no-go decision, but also your inflight decisions to continue
the flight or divert.
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
6
Chapter 5 – Perform
Mitigate, Eliminate, Evaluate
Once you have perceived a hazard (step one) and processed its impact on flight safety
(step two), it is time to PERFORM by taking the best course of action, and then
evaluating its impact. Your goal is to
Your mental willingness to follow through on safe decisions, especially those that require
delay or diversion is critical. You can bulk up your mental muscles by:
• Using personal m inim um s check list to make some decisions in advance of the
flight. If you are unsure of how to develop personal minimums, take a look at the
methods presented in the three documents below. Choose one that works for you,
and stick to it!
• Preflight your passengers by preparing them for the possibility of delay and
diversion, and involve them in your evaluation process. Download the Passenger
Preflight Checklist below for specific ideas.
In other cases, accidents attributed to pilot error result from shortcomings in the pilot's
"mental airplane" systems knowledge. Examples might include misprogramming the
autopilot, or turning the wrong knob on the GPS navigator. Use of aircraft training
devices, computer-based training, and regular practice in the aircraft can help prevent
these errors.
Since this course focuses on aeronautical decision-making, this chapter will take a closer
look at factors involved in "decisional errors," which usually involve a combination of
cognitive activities and judgments.
Filtering: The brain's working memory capacity is limited to about seven (7) pieces, or
“chunks,” of information at one time, so one of the life skills we acquire is the ability to
filter the flood of information arriving through our senses. In any flight, especially one
with challenging weather, we may unconsciously screen out vital information. Use of
the PAVE checklist as a guide to your ongoing mental hazard scan can help prevent
inappropriate filtering, because it provides a comprehensive and methodical approach to
the information gathering process.
Filling in the Gaps: When there is more information than the brain can accurately
perceive and process, it compensates by filling in the gaps and producing an
interpretation that is not correct.
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
8
Patterns and Expectations: The brain uses existing knowledge and experience as a
shortcut to processing new information. This tendency can be useful, but it can also be
dangerous. Examples:
• When you are processing information from an unfamiliar GPS navigator, you
might unconsciously make incorrect assumptions on the basis of how information
is accessed or displayed on the one you normally use.
• If previous experience at a familiar airport leads you to expect a clearance to
land on runway 10, you may "hear" a clearance to land on “one-zero,” even if
the controller in fact clears you to land on runway 01.
Confirmation Bias: Human beings also have a tendency to look for information that
confirms a decision we have already made. For example, imagine that you have
decided to continue a flight you have already started. You call Flight Watch for updated
weather information on several nearby airports, but you might unconsciously give more
weight to the information that supports your decision to press ahead.
The "reality" part of the systematic ADM process is especially useful in countering errors
associated with patterns, expectations, and confirmation bias. Make a conscious effort
to identify your expectations, and then be alert to how reality differs.
Framing: When you evaluate options for a decision, be sensitive to how you state, or
"frame," your alternatives. Assume you are deciding whether to continue a flight in
deteriorating weather. If you frame the “continue” decision in positive terms (e.g., “I
can save a lot of time and inconvenience if I go on”), you are probably more likely to
decide on continuing. If, on the other hand, you frame the decision in negative terms
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
9
(e.g., “I could get myself in real trouble if I push on”), you are more likely to divert to a
safer destination.
Consistent use of these tools can also help with quick recognition of errors we do make,
and safe management of the resulting situation.
The Art of Aeronautical Decision-Making
10
Most of the quiz questions ask you to use scenario information to choose the response
that you believe to be the best, or most complete, answer for each multiple-choice
question.
You m ay not alw ays agree w ith the official "correct" answ er, and you m ay
have a very good reason for choosing a different response .
If your responses differ, you might find it interesting to discuss the scenarios, and your
reasoning, with an instructor or another pilot. The point of the exercise is to practice
using the 3-P framework to spot hazards, evaluate consequences and options, and
choose a safe course of action.
Since many of the questions involve decisions affected by weather, you might also find it
helpful to review the General Aviation Pilot’s Guide to Preflight Planning, Weather Self-
Briefings, and Weather Decision Making, which uses the 3-P framework.
Review
Chapter 1 – What is ADM?
ADM is a systematic approach to the mental process of evaluating a given set of
circumstances and determining the best course of action.
Chapter 3 - Perceive
To PERCEIVE, think through circumstances related to the: Pilot, Aircraft, enVironment,
and External pressures. The fundamental question to ask is, “what could hurt me, my
passengers, or my aircraft?
Chapter 4 - Process
To PROCESS, think through the Consequences of each hazard, Alternatives available,
Reality of the situation, and External pressures that might influence your analysis.
Chapter 5 - Perform
To PERFORM, determine the best course of action. Your goal is to mitigate or eliminate
the adverse impact, and then evaluate to ensure that your course of action is having the
desired effect.
Even with the use of a systematic ADM process, watch out for errors that can result
from the way human beings naturally see perceive, process, and perform in complex
situations.