Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

Nanolithogr

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/274314679

Nanolithography

Chapter · August 2013


DOI: 10.5772/55527

CITATIONS READS

2 4,447

2 authors, including:

Gunasekaran Venugopal
Central University of Tamil Nadu
68 PUBLICATIONS 1,194 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Enhanced Photocatalytic Properties of Nanostructured WO3 Semiconductor-Photocatalyst Prepared via Hydrothermal Method View project

Reduced graphene oxid/ZnO (GZ) Nano composite: An efficient nano-photocatalyst for Wastewater Purification View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Gunasekaran Venugopal on 01 April 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Chapter 8

Nanolithography

Gunasekaran Venugopal and Sang-Jae Kim

Additional information is available at the end of the chapter

http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

1. Introduction

Nanolithography is the branch of nanotechnology concerned with the study and application
of the nanofabrication of nanometer-scale structures, meaning nanopatterning with at least
one lateral dimension between the size of an individual atom and approximately 100 nm. The
term nanolithography is derived from the Greek words “nanos”, meaning dwarf; “lithos”,
meaning rock or stone; and “graphein” meaning to write. Therefore the literal translation is
"tiny writing on stone", however nowadays one understands something different whenever
this term is associated with nanotechnology. Nanolithography is used e.g. during the nano‐
fabrication of leading-edge semiconductor integrated circuits (nanocircuitry), for nanoelec‐
tromechanical systems (NEMS) or for almost any other fundamental application across various
scientific disciplines in nanoresearch.
This technology can be suitable to use in nanofabrication of various semiconducting Integrated
Circuits (ICs), NEMS and for various applications in research. The modification in semicon‐
ductor chips at the nano-scale (in the range of 10-9 meter) is also possible. This method is
contrasting to various existing nanolithographic techniques like Photolithography (Venugo‐
pal, 2011), Nanoimprint lithography (NIL), Scanning Probe Lithography (SPL), Atomic Force
Microscope (AFM) nanolithography, Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography (EUVL) and X-ray
Lithography.
In this chapter, the various nanolithographic fabrication techniques will be discussed in detail
in which we will focus the various nano-patterning techniques/procedures suitable for device
fabrication and their engineering applications. This technique is mainly used for nanofabrica‐
tion. Nanofabrication is the method in which the devices can be designed and manufactured
with the dimensions in nanometers [Kim, 1999; Venugopal, 2011a, 2011b, 2011c).
The conventional fabrication techniques like Focused Ion Beam (FIB) and wet etching methods
are able to remove or etch the parts in the range to micron scale (Kim, 2001). However, in recent

© 2013 Venugopal and Kim; licensee InTech. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
188 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

days, patterning and etching have to be done in nanoscale for specific applications. For that
nano-fabrication and nano-level manipulation are the options to choose. Nanomanupulation
plays major role in the field of nanofabrication. Nanomanupulation is a technique in which
some specific tools are used to manipulate the objects in nanoscale (Parikh, 2008). At present,
Scanning Probe microscopic methods involved in AFM [Davis, 2003) and Scanning Tunneling
Microscopy (STM) are being used to manipulate the objects in nanometer scale. Specifically,
AFM is being used to move the atoms, carbon nanotubes, nanoparticles, various nano-scale
objects and also to test integrated circuits. Instruments used in nanolithography include the
Scanning Probe Microscope (SPM) and the AFM. The SPM allows surface viewing in fine detail
without necessarily modifying it. Either the SPM or the AFM can be used to etch, write, or
print on a surface in single-atom dimensions (Venugopal, 2012).
The main drawbacks in the existing lithographic techniques will be carefully analyzed in this
chapter. Also the need of nano-patterning for the low-cost, high throughput surface patterning
technologies will be presented in this chapter. In addition, the complete coverage of nanoli‐
thographic process which includes Introduction, Resists and Masks, Photon-based Lithogra‐
phy, Electron Beam Lithography, Ion Beam Lithography and emerging nanolithographic
techniques will be discussed in detail. However, the alternate nanolithography techniques like
Micro-contact printing, Nanoimprint Lithography, Scanned Probe Lithography, Dip-pen
Lithography will also be discussed in detail in this chapter

2. Importance of micro/nano patterning

Micro/Nano patterning is a one of the miniaturization technique for patterns, especially used
for electronics. Nowadays it becomes a standard in biomaterials engineering and for funda‐
mental research on cellular biology by mean of soft lithography. It generally uses photoli‐
thography methods but many techniques have been developed. The batch fabrication of
microstructures requires a low-cost, high throughput surface patterning technology.
For example, it is important to design nanodevices such as nano-transistors and nanodiodes,
nanoswitches and nanologic gates, in order to design nanoscale computers with tera-scale
capabilities. All living biological systems function due to molecular interactions of different
subsystems. The molecular building blocks (proteins and nucleic acids, lipids and carbohy‐
drates, DNA and RNA) can be viewed as inspiring possible strategy on how to design high-
performance NEMS and MEMS that possess the properties and characteristics needed. In
addition, analytical and numerical methods are available to analyze the dynamics and three-
dimensional geometry, bonding, and other features of atoms and molecules. So, electromag‐
netic and mechanical, as well as other physical and chemical properties can be studied.
Nanostructures and nanosystems can be widely used in medicine and health. Among possible
applications of nanotechnology are: drug synthesis and drug delivery (the therapeutic
potential will be enormously enhanced due to direct effective delivery of new types of drugs
to the specified body sites), nanosurgery and nanotherapy, genome synthesis and diagnostics,
nanoscale actuators and sensors (disease diagnosis and prevention), nonrejectable nanoartifi‐
cial organs design and implant, and design of high-performance nanomaterials.
Nanolithography 189
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

It is important that these technologies drastically change the fabrication and manufacturing of
materials, devices, and systems via:
• higher degree of safety

• environmental competitiveness.

• improved stability and robustness

• higher degree of efficiency and capability, flexibility and integrity supportability and
affordability, survivability and redundancy

• Predictable properties of nano composites and materials (e.g., light weight and high
strength, thermal stability, low volume and size.

3. Classification of lithographic techniques

There are many techniques through which micro/nano patterning could be possible. They are,
• Photolithography – an conventional and classical method

◦ Ion beam Lithography


• X-ray lithography

• Electron beam lithography

• Alternate Nanolithographic Techniques

◦ Micro-contact printing

◦ Nano-imprint lithography

◦ Scanning Probe lithography

3.1. Photolithography – A conventional and classical method

Lithography consists of patterning substrate by employing the interaction of beams of photons


or particles with materials. Photolithography is widely used in the integrated circuits (ICs)
manufacturing. The process of IC manufacturing consists of a series of 10-20 steps or more,
called mask layers where layers of materials coated with resists are patterned then transferred
onto the material layer.

A photolithography system consists of a light source, a mask, and an optical projection system.
Photoresists are radiation sensitive materials that usually consist of a photo-sensitive com‐
pound, a polymeric backbone, and a solvent. Resists can be classified upon their solubility
after exposure into: positive resists (solubility of exposed area increases) and negative resists
(solubility of exposed area decreases). Fig. 1 shows the schematic of lithographic process in
order to make the pattern on the desired substrate.
190 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

3.1.1. Patterning graphene device using photolithography

As mechanically exfoliated graphene sheets are in a mesoscopic scale, a lithographic technique


is required to make metallic contacts on the sheet. Highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG)
was used as the source material for graphene fabrication. Graphene flakes were mechanically
transferred onto a highly doped silicon wafer. The graphene flakes for device fabrication were
chosen by color and contrast method. p-type silicon wafers (100) with a boron doping con‐
centration of NA = 1015 cm−3 can be used in which SiO2 was thermally oxidized with the thickness
of tox = 300 nm. The substrate, p +Si (resistivity 1-30 Ω cm), serves as a back-gate for the FET.
To keep the disorder level comparable, standard RCA cleaning process followed by acetone
and isopropyl alcohol to clean the Si/SiO2 wafers.

Figure 1. Schematic of photolithographic process. A pattern has been made on the substrate. (Scale bar is not mentioned)

Photo-lithography method can be used in this work to make electrode pattern. Details about
the lithography process is discussed below. Figure 2 shows the mask aligner system.

Figure 2. Mask aligner system (MDA-400 M) for lithography pattern fabrication


Nanolithography 191
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

The various stages of this lithography process or the procedures to be followed for lithographic
pattern which are given below:
Stage -1: Wafer or substrate cleaning:

• Use clouse in the entire experiment


• Use Iso-propyl alcohol to clean wafer/substrate
• Use DI water to clean
• Use tissue paper and Air - drying to remove the water particles from the surface of wafer
(both side).

Stage – 2: Spin coating of Photo-resist:

• The cleaned wafer to be put in spin coater and start creating vacuum
• Set spin coating rpm and time, using timer 1 and 2. (see the optimized parameter table)
• Put photo resist at the center of the cleaned wafer and spin coat.

Stage – 3: Baking the wafer


Put the spin coated wafer in the hot plate which is in 60º C for 150 sec and then remove wafer
from the hot plate and do air cooling (only for back side of wafer )
Stage – 4: UV Exposure
Check and ensure the initial machine set up parameters is done carefully.

• Put the wafer on the substrate stage properly and press substrate Vac. button
• Put the mask in mask- holder and press Mask Vac. button on
• Mount the mask- holder over the substrate stage.
• Use Micrometer handle to bring the substrate stage and mask holder to touch each other.
(no gap should be maintained between them). Be careful while doing this process.
• Press Vacuum contact button
• Then wait for 20 sec.
• Turn Align and Exposure knob one by one carefully.
• Now the aligner system will start working and comes to its position.
• Set the expose time by using timer (standard 2.5 sec )
• Now press Exposure button.
• After exposing UV light, turn off align and exposure knob.

Stage – 5: Removal of wafer


• Now put off Vacuum contact button
192 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

• Then bring down the stage by using Micrometer handle


• Remove mask holder carefully
• Then press substrate vac. button off and remove wafer from the wafer stage.

Stage – 6: Developing process


The UV-exposed wafer to be put in developer solvent [standard developer solution AZ 300
MIF used]. Slow soaking has to be performed with respect to user need and process. In this
process, the UV-unexposed parts (in case of positive PR) the photo-resist will be dissolved in
the developer solution and show clear electrode pattern fabricated via mask. Then put the
wafer in DI water bath for 1 min and do air- drying to clean the wafer thoroughly.
Stage – 7: Pattern Analysis
After developing,

• Put the developed wafer again in wafer stage and press substrate Vac. Button
• Use CCD camera -module’s adjusting knobs in order to check the developed pattern.

Expose UV with
Sample Spin coating Prebake Developing time Remarks
Mask

300 rpm 2200 rpm Excellent 4-


1 6sec 40 sec 60°C 150 sec 55 sec 2 sec probe Pattern
(timer 1) (timer 2) obtained

Table 1. Optimized condition for Lithographic Process in MDA-400M Mask Aligner (using AZ 5214 positive photo-resist)

The schematic of the detailed lithographic process is presented in Figure.3 (a-e).


After completing the experiment: Mask cleaning to be done
Mask cleaning after exposure is important in the lithographic pattern process. Hence, the
defects deposited in mask can be avoided during next experiment time. To clean the mask, the
following things to be followed:

• rinse the mask with acetone


• rinse the Mask with IPA
• Dry the Mask using the N2 gun

The Lithographic process was followed which was described in the above section 2.4. The
positive photo-resist (AZ 5214) was spin-coated over the graphene flakes on the substrate. By
using photolithography (Mask Aligner MDA- 400M; MIDAS), the graphene flakes were
patterned through Cr mask for electrode formation. Then the gold (99.99 %) electrodes of 100
nm- thick were formed through thermal evaporation technique and structured by lift-off using
acetone. A metal contact was made to the substrate as the back-gate contact. After lift-off
Nanolithography 193
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

Figure 3. Photolithographic process of electrode patterning on graphene. (a) Graphene flake on Si/SiO2 substrate (b)
Photoresist is spin-coated over the graphene flake and UV light illuminated through Cr mask. (c) the pattern after de‐
veloping process (d) gold (Au) evaporation through thermal evaporation technique (e) after lift-off process, the device
with source and drain electrode structure with back-gate configuration. (Venugopal, 2011).

Figure 4. (a) An optical image of single layer graphene is shown. Single and few layer graphene flakes are clearly seen.
(b) Schematic of graphene device with electrode pattern.

process, the device was annealed at 200° C in Ar/H2 atmosphere for 45 min to improve the
adhesion with graphene flake as well as to avoid contaminants. After the lithography, metallic
Au/Al electrodes are deposited by using thermal evaporation system. Then lift-off process is
carried out (using acetone) to get the final pattern for device characterization. If necessary,
graphene can be etched to a desired shape by the oxygen plasma ashing with negative or
positive electron-beam resist stencils, which were not followed here.
194 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

3.2. Ion beam lithography

In this section, ion beam based patterning technique is discussed. For example Focused Ion
Beam (FIB) based three dimensional etching method is followed for patterning micro/nano
devices (Seliger, 1979).

3.2.1. Focused ion beam 3-D fabrication technique

Miniaturization is the central theme in modern fabrication technology. Many of the compo‐
nents used in modern products are becoming smaller and smaller. Here, the focused ion beam
(FIB) direct milling technique will be discussed with the focus on fabricating devices at the
micrometer to nano-scale level. Because of the very short wavelength and very large energy
density, the FIB has the ability for direct fabrication of structures that have feature sizes at or
below 1 μm. As a result, the FIB has recently become a popular candidate in making high-
quality microdevices or high-precision microstructures (Kim, 2008).

The FIB has been a powerful tool in the semiconductor industry mainly for mask repair‐
ing, device modification, failure analysis and integrated circuit debugging. Two basic
working modes, ion beam direct write and ion beam projection, have been developed for
these applications. The ion beam direct write process, also known as FIB milling (FIBM),
is the process of transferring patterns by direct impingement of the ion beam on the
substrate. It is a large collection of microfabrication techniques that removes materials from
a substrate and has been successfully used for fabricating various three-dimensional (3D)
micro structures and devices from a wide range of materials. For the ion beam projection
process, a collimated beam of ions passes through a stencil mask and the reduced image
of the mask is projected onto the substrate underneath. The ion beam projection process is
also known as focused ion beam lithography (FIBL) and can serve as an alternative to
conventional optical lithography (Kim, 1999).

For example, to develop the graphite stacked-junctions, planar-type nanostructures, a high-


resolution FIB instrument (SII SMI-2050) can be used. The photo-image of FIB unit and the
schematic of FIB functions are presented in Figure. 5.

The 3-D etching technique can be followed by tilting the substrate stage up to 90°
automatically for etching thin graphite flake. It has freedom to tilt the substrate stage up
to 60° and rotate up to 360°. The steps of the fabrication process using a FIB etching are
shown in Figure. 6 (a–d). The clear axes of the FIB process configurations with in-plane (x–
y) and vertical axes (as z direction) are indicated in an axis diagram in Figure. 6(b). The
in-plane area was defined by tilting the sample stage by 30° anticlockwise with respect to
the ion beam and milling along the ab-plane. The in-plane etching process is shown in
Figure. 6(a)-(c). The out of plane or the c-axis plane was fabricated by rotating the sample
stage by an angle of 180°, then tilting by 60° anticlockwise with respect to the ion beam,
and milling along the c-axis direction (Saini, 2010). The schematic diagram of the fabrica‐
tion process for the side-plane is shown in Figure. 6(d).
Nanolithography 195
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

Figure 5. The photograph image of FIB unit and schematic of FIB machine

Figure 6. Nanoscale stack fabrication process using focused ion beam 3D etching method. (a) Scheme of the inclined
plane has an angle of 60° with ion beam (where we mount sample). (b) The initial orientation of sample and sample
stage. (c) Sample stage titled by 30° anticlockwise with respect to ion beam and milling along ab-plane. (d) The sam‐
ple stage rotated by an angle of 180° and also tilted by 60° anticlockwise with respect to ion beam and milled along
the c-axis. (Venugopal, 2011d)

By varying the stack height length and in-plane area, the various sizes of stacked-junctions can
be fabricated on the graphite layer. The number of elementary junctions in the stack will vary
depends on the height of the junction. If junction height is more, the more number of elemen‐
tary junctions exists which provide larger more resistance in c-axis characteristics.
196 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

3.3. X- ray lithography

This lithography processes involve the category of nanolithographic techniques, through


which transistors with smaller features can be patterned. It uses X-rays to transfer a geometric
pattern from a mask to a light-sensitive chemical photoresist, or simply "resist," on the
substrate. A series of chemical treatments then engraves the produced pattern into the material
underneath the photoresist.

X-ray lithography can be extended to an optical resolution of 15 nm by using the short


wavelengths of 1 nm for the illumination. This is implemented by the proximity printing
approach. The technique is developed to the extent of batch processing. The extension of the
method relies on Near Field X-rays in Fresnel diffraction: a clear mask feature is "demagnified"
by proximity to a wafer that is set near to a "Critical Condition". This Condition determines
the mask-to-wafer Gap and depends on both the size of the clear mask feature and on the
wavelength. The method is simple because it requires no lenses. This technique originated as
a candidate for next-generation lithography for the semiconductor industry, with batches of
microprocessors successfully produced. Having short wavelengths (below 1 nm), X-rays
overcome the diffraction limits of optical lithography, allowing smaller feature sizes. If the X-
ray source isn't collimated, as with a synchrotron radiation, elementary collimating mirrors or
diffractive lenses are used in the place of the refractive lenses used in optics. Fig. 7 illustrate
the process of X-ray lithography.

Figure 7. (a) Schematic process of X-ray lithography. (b) structure produced with X-ray lithography (Courtesy Source :
SAL, Inc.). (Scale bar is not mentioned)

The X-rays illuminate a mask placed in proximity of a resist-coated wafer. The X-rays are
broadband, typically from a compactsynchrotron radiation source, allowing rapid exposure.
Deep X-ray lithography (DXRL) uses yet shorter wavelengths on the order of 0.1 nm and
modified procedures such as the LIGA process, to fabricate deep and even three-dimensional
structures. X-rays are usually generate secondary electrons as in the cases of extreme ultraviolet
lithography and electron beam lithography. While the fine pattern definition is due principally
to secondaries from Auger electrons with a short path length, the primary electrons will
sensitize the resist over a larger region than the X-ray exposure.
Nanolithography 197
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

3.3.1. Advantages of X-ray lithography

There are several advantages in X-ray lithography.


1. Resolves diffraction issues

2. Shorter wavelengths ( 0.1 - 10 nm) can be used

3. Smaller features can be patterned

3.3.2. Disadvantages of X-ray Lithography

The following are the disadvantages of X-ray Lithography


1. Usage of X-ray masks

2. Deformation during the process

3. Vibrations during the process

4. Time consuming process

3.4. E-beam lithography

Electron Beam Lithography uses a tightly focussed beam of electrons scanned over the surface
of a substrate. Typically, electron beam lithography with ultra high resolution (UHR) is used
at the very beginning of a multiple technique and a multiple step process in a top down
approach in order to transfer the nanostructure into the substrate or subsequently build up a
device in a layer by layer fashion.

3.4.1. E-beam applications

This E-beam lithographic technique is mainly having following advantages in research field:
1. Research and Development

2. Advanced processing techniques

3. Future processing equipment

4. Can convert SEM to be used as an EBL machine

5. Minimum resolution is slightly larger

6. Used with photolithography and X-ray lithography to create next generation devices.
For nanolithography with ultra high resolution down to sub10nm feature sizes, complete
dedicated e-beam writer systems or converted scanning electron microscopes (SEM) can be
used. With the help of a design editor and a pattern generator, the electron beam is guided
over the substrate surface, which is covered with electron beam sensitive resist such as PMMA,
in order to generate a resist mask which then can be further used for nanopattern transfer. The
steps of e-beam lithography is given in Fig. 8.
198 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

a. Resist Preparation
In this Process, the PMMA solution is spin coated onto the sample and baked to harden the
film and remove any remaining solvent.
b. Exposure
Selected areas of sample are exposed to a beam of high energy electrons
c. Development
Sample is immersed in developer solution to selectively remove resist from the exposed area.

Figure 8. Schematic process of e-beam lithography. (a) Resist Preparation (b) Exposure (c) Development

3.4.2. E-beam lithography advantages

1. The resolution is not limited by diffraction; minimum feature is written on the nanoscale.

2. Can write smaller features than X-ray lithography and photolithography

3. Pattern is written directly to the wafer.

4. Used to develop specialized devices and prototype devices

5. Fast turn-around time

6. This employs a beam of electron instead of photons

3.4.3. E-Beam Lithography Disadvantages

1. Not an efficient process for industrial processing

2. Takes multiple hours to pattern entire wafer

3. Machines are costly

4. Greater than 5 million dollars

5. System is more complex than photolithography system


Nanolithography 199
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

6. Scattering and over exposure result in minimum feature being larger

7. Slow throughput

3.5. Alternate nanolithographic techniques

3.5.1. Micro-contact printing (soft lithography)

This is known as soft lithography that usually uses the relief patterns on a PDMS (poly-
dimethylsiloxane) stamp in order to form patterns of self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of
ink on the surface of a substrate through conformal contact. This technique has wide range of
application in cell biology, microelectronics, surface chemistry, micromachining, Patterning
cells, patterning DNA and Patterning protein.

Figure 9 represents the process of Micro-contact printing. This process involves the application
of ink to stamp, application of stamp to surface, removal of stamp and residues rinsed off

Figure 9. Schematic of the Micro-contact printing process (Courtesy: IBM Zurich)

Advantages of Micro-contact printing:


1. Very simple and easy pattern procedures to create micro-scale features

2. This can be done in a traditional laboratory environment. No need clean room facility

3. Using single master, multiple stamps can be made

4. Reliability of individual stamps which can be used for many times.

5. It is a cheaper method.
Limitation in Micro-contact Printing:
1. Diffusion of ink from PDMS stamp to surface during pattering

2. Shrinking of stamp is one of main problem in which stamp can eventually shrink in size
resulting difference in desired dimensions of the substrate patterning
200 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

3. Contamination of substrate

4. Stamp deformation

3.5.2. Nano-imprint lithography

Nanoimprint lithography (NIL) is an emerging process that can produce sub-10nm features.
It is a simple process that uses a mould to emboss the resist with the required pattern. After
embossing the resist, compressed resist material is removed using anisotropic etching and the
substrate exposed. It can produce features at extremely small resolutions that cover a large
area with a high throughput and relatively low cost, which is main advantage of this technique.
It can be adapted to transfer all components needed to create a thin film transistor on a plastic
substrate. It involves pressing and heating a thin film between a patterned template and a
substrate. Upon heating, the patterned film adheres only to the substrate [ref Fig. 10]. This has
high throughput and is relatively inexpensive compared to developing extreme deep UV
lithography for commercial viability. It is also flexible enough to be used at chip level with
several layers or at the wafer level when single layer is required. It can give resolutions lower
than 10nm with high throughput at low cost. One of the current barriers to production at these
resolutions is the development of mould. It can be used for fabricating nanoscale photo-
detectors, silicon quantum-dot, quantum wire and ring transistors (Chou, S.Y. 1996)

Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the steps involved in the nanoimprint lithographic process [Courtesy: Source: AZo‐
Nano]
Nanolithography 201
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

Applications of Nanoimprint lithography

1. It can be used to make optical, photonic, electrical and biological devices.


2. Advances in mould manufacturing will have wide application of NIL in smaller devices.

3.5.3. Scanning Probe Lithography (SPL)

SPL is an emerging area of research in which the scanning tunneling microscope (STM) or the
atomic force microscope (AFM) is used to pattern nanometer-scale features. The patterning
methods include mechanical pattering such as scratching or nano-indentation, or local heating
with sharp tip (Dagata, 1995). When a voltage bias is applied between a sharp probe tip and a
sample, an intense electric field is generated in the vicinity of the tip (Ref. Fig. 11).

Figure 11. Schematic diagram of the Scanning probe lithography. Electrical bias between a conducting tip and a sub‐
strate induces a highly localized enhanced oxidation [Courtesy Source: Dagata et al, Science, Vol.270, pp.1625-1626,
1995]

Advantages:

1. This process can make nanopatterns without optical apparatus.


2. It can control deposited material by hydrophobicity of the surface.
3. This process can make arbitrary patterns by controlling the trajectory of AFM tip.
4. This process involves small scan area, Low throughout.
5. By using this technique, it is possible to make nanowire, SET, etc.. By using an organic
solvent, the organic material can be deposited on the surface.

SPL method is a recognized as a lithographic tool in the deep sub-micron regime, as it is


compatible with standard semiconductor processing. There are four main factors which dictate
the viability of SPL as a known patterning method for the semiconductor industry. They are

1. Throughput (wafers/hour)
2. Resolution
3. Alignment accuracy
202 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

4. Reliability

Scanning probe lithography involves a set of lithographic techniques, in which a microscopic


or nanoscopic stylus is moved mechanically across a surface to form a pattern. In this method,
another technique describes a SPL technique which is known as Dip Pen Nanolithography.

Dip Pen Nanolithography - in this process, the patterning is done by directly transferring
chemical species to the surface. We can call this process as constructive process.

3.5.3.1. Dip Pen Nanolithography (DPN)

Dip Pen Nanolithography (DPN) is known as a soft-lithography technique that uses an AFM
scanning probe tip to draw nanostructures. In this process, a probe tip is coated with liquid
ink, which then flows onto the surface to make patterns wherever the tip makes contact. This
kind of directwrite technique provides high-resolution patterning capabilities for a number of
molecular and biomolecular “inks” on a variety of substrates. Substrates are the base material
that the images are printed on. Some of the applications of the DPN technique include sol gel
templates that are used to prepare nanotubes and nanowires, and protein nanoarrays to detect
the amount of proteins in biological samples such as blood. (Ref. Fig. 12).

This process was first developed by Professor Chad Mirkin at Northwestern University
Nanotechnology Institute for depositing thin organic films in patterns with feature sizes of
around 10 nm ( about 20 times better than the best optical lithography) (Mirkin, 1999).

In DPN technology, the ink on a sharp object is transported to a paper substrate via capillary
forces. The capillary transport of molecules from the AFM tip to the solid substrate is used in
DPN to directly “write” pattern consisting of a relatively small collection of molecules in
nanometer dimesions. An AFM tip is used to write alkanethiols with 30-nm line width
resolution on a gold thin film in a manner analogous to that of a dip pen. Molecules are
delivered from the AFM tip to a solid substrate of interest via capillary transport, making DPN
a potentially useful tool for creating and functionalizing nanoscale devices (Mirkin, 1999).

Several factors decide the resolution of DPN:

1. The grain size of the substrate affects DPN resolution much as the texture of paper controls
the resolution of conventional writing.

2. The tip-substrate contact time and thus the scan speed influence DPN resolution.

3. Chemisorption and self-assembly of the molecules can be used to limit the diffusion of
the molecules after deposition.

4. Relative humidity seems to affect the resolution of the lithographic process by controlling
the rate of ODT transport from the tip to the substrate. The size of the water meniscus that
bridges the tip and substrate depends on relative humidity. For example, the 30-nm wide
line required 5 min to generate in a 34% relative humidity environment, whereas the 100-
nm line required 1.5 min to generate in a 42% relative humidity environment.
Nanolithography 203
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

Figure 12. Schematic representation of DPN. A water meniscus forms between the AFM tip coated with ODT and the
Au substrate. The size of the meniscus, which is controlled by relative humidity, affects the ODT transport rate, the
effective tip-substrate contact area and DPN resolution. [Courtesy: C.A. Mirkin, et al, Science 283, 661, 1999]

3.5.3.2. DPN application on semiconductor surfaces

Dip-Pen Nanolithography can not only apply to gold surface using alkyl or aryl thiols as inks,
but also to semiconductor surfaces, such as silicon and gallium arsenide. Hexamethyldisila‐
zane (HMDS) is used as the ink to pattern and modify (polarity) the surface of semiconductors.
Lateral force microscopy (LFM) can be used to differentiate between oxidized semiconductor
surfaces and patterned areas with the deposited monolayers of HMDS. The choice of the
silazane ink is a critical component of the process since the traditional adsorbates such as
trichlorosilanes are incompatible with the water meniscus and polymerize during ink depo‐
sition. This work provides insight into additional factors, such as temperature and adsorbate
reactivity, that control the rate of the DPN process and paves the way for researchers to
interface organic and biological structures generated via DPN with electronically important
semiconductor substrates (Ivanisevic, 2001).

3.5.3.3. DPN application on magnetic materials: Approach to high density recording and storage

Over the past decade, there has been considerable interest in methods for synthesizing and
patterning nanoscale magnetic materials. These nanomaterials show novel size-dependent
properties, are potentially useful for high-density recording. Two of the main challenges in
this field are: (a) site-and shape-specific patterning of hard magnetic nanostructure on the
sub-100 nm scale; (b) ability to reliably and reproducibly read/write such minute features. The
conventional top-down approach in recording media is plagued by the difficulties of etching
and patterning novel hard magnetic systems, especially as the individual recording elements
approach the super paramagnetic limit at room temperature operations. DPN can be used as
a direct-write method for fabricating "hard" magnetic barium hexaferrite, BaFe12O19 (BaFe),
nanostructures. This method utilizes a conventional atomic force microscope tip, coated with
the BaFe precursor solution, to generate patterns that can be post-treated at elevated temper‐
ature to generate magnetic features consisting of barium ferrite in its hexagonal magneto‐
plumbite (M-type) structure. Features ranging from several hundred nm down to below 100
nm can be generated. (Fu, 2003).
204 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

4. Conclusion

In conclusion, the complete nanolithographic processes which include introduction, resists


and masks, Photon-based lithography, electron beam lithography, ion beam lithography and
emerging nanolithographic techniques like the alternate nanolithography techniques Micro-
contact printing, Nanoimprint Lithography, Scanned Probe Lithography, Dip-pen Lithogra‐
phy were briefly discussed in this chapter. As a conclusion, the following table can presents
the complete scenerio of the nanolithographic process.

Ideal Advanced Optical Electron Beam Nano Imprint

Pattern shape Any Any any Any

Resolution (nm) Good Good Good Good

Alignment (nm) Good Good Good Poor

Large & small Pattern Yes Yes No Yes

Throughput (wafers/hr) High High Low Medium

Running Cost Low High Low Medium

Initial Cost Low High Medium Low

Table 2. Comparison of results between conventional and Nanolithographic methods

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the supports from the National Research Foundation
of Korea Grant under contract number 2011-0015829 and 2011 Jeju Sea Grant College Program
funded by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), Republic of Korea.
A part of this work was carried out at the Research Instrument Center (RIC) at Jeju National
University, Jeju, and Republic of Korea. Also the author (G.V) would like to thank the
management of Karunya University for continuing this research through their KSTG seed
money grant No. KU/Reg/D(R)/OO/12/29 dated 21.01.2012 and DST NanoMission, New Delhi.

Author details

Gunasekaran Venugopal1 and Sang-Jae Kim2

1 Karunya University, Department of Nanosciences and Technology, Tamil Nadu, India

2 Jeju National University, Department of Mechatronics Engineering, Jeju, South Korea


Nanolithography 205
http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/55527

References

[1] Chou, S. Y. (1996). Nano imprint Lithography. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., , 14, 4129.

[2] Dagata, J A. (1995). Device Fabrication by Scanned Probe Oxidation. Science, , 270,
1625-1626.

[3] Davis, R. C. (2003). Chemomechanical surface patterning and functionalization of sil‐


icon surfaces using an atomic force microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett. , 82

[4] Fu, L. (2003). Dip-Pen Patterning of magnetic materials. Nano Lett., , 3, 757-760.

[5] Ivanisevic, A. (2001). Dip-pen nanolithography on semiconductor surfaces. J. Am.


Chem. Soc. , 123, 7887-7889.

[6] Kim, S. J. (1999). D intrinsic Josephson junctions using c-axis thin films and single
crystals. Supercond. Sci. Technol., , 12, 729-731.

[7] Kim, S. J. (1999). Submicron Stacked-junction Fabrication from Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ


Whiskers by Focused-Ion-Beam Etching. Appl. Phys. Lett., , 74(8), 1156-1158.

[8] Kim, S. J. (2001). Fabrication and Characteristics of Submicron Tunnelling Junctions


on High Tc Superconducting c-axis Thin Films and Single Crystals. J. Appl. Phys., ,
89(11), 7675-7677.

[9] Kim, S. J. (2008). Development of Focused Ion Beam Machining Systems for Fabricat‐
ing Three-dimensional Structures. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., , 47(6), 5120-5122.

[10] Mirkin, C. A. (1999). Dip-pen Nanolithography. Science. , 283

[11] Parikh, D. (2008). Nanoscale Pattern Definition on Nonplanar Surfaces Using Ion
Beam Proximity Lithography and Conformal Plasma-Deposited Resist. J. Microelec‐
tromech. Syst. , 17

[12] Saini, S. (2010). Characterization of Submicron Sized Josephson Junction Fabricated


in a Bi2Sr2Ca2Cu3O10+δ (Bi-2223) Single Crystal Whisker. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. , 23,
811-813.

[13] Seliger, R. L. (1979). High‐resolution, Ion‐beam Processes for Microstructure Fabrica‐


tion. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B., , 16(6), 1610-1612.

[14] Venugopal, G. (2011). Temperature dependent transfer characteristics of graphene


field effect transistors fabricated using photolithography. Curr. Appl. Phys. , 11, S381-
S384.

[15] Venugopal, G. (2011a). Fabrication of Nanoscale Three-dimensional Graphite


Stacked-junctions by Focused-ion-beam and Observation of Anomalous Transport
Characteristics. Carbon, , 49(8), 2766-2772.
206 Advances in Micro/Nano Electromechanical Systems and Fabrication Technologies

[16] Venugopal, G. (2011b). Temperature Dependence of Transport Anisotropy of Planar-


type Graphite Nano-structures Fabricated by Focused Ion Beam. J. Nanosci. Nanotech‐
nol. , 11(1), 296-300.

[17] Venugopal, G. (2011c). Fabrication and Characteristics of Submicron Stacked-Junc‐


tions on Thin Graphite Flakes. J.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. , 11(2), 1405-1408.

[18] Venugopal, G. (2011d). Investigation of electrical transport characteristics of nano‐


scale stacks fabricated on thin graphite layer. Thin Solid Films. , 519, 7095-7099.

[19] Venugopal, G. (2012). An investigation of the electrical transport properties of gra‐


phene-oxide thin Films. Matl. Chem. Phys. , 132, 29-33.

View publication stats

You might also like