Naman Report Final
Naman Report Final
Naman Report Final
ON
AT
WNS GLOBAL SERVICES
SUBMITTED BY
To
THROUGH
MBA DEPARTMENT
MATRIX SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES,
PUNE- 41
(2022-24)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank my external Guide DIKSHA RAJPAL for giving me this
opportunity to do my internship project in their esteemed organization. It has
contributed immensely to my learning.
I express my profound gratitude towards our Director, Prof. (Dr) Satish S. Ubale for
giving me valuable guidance, suggestions and advice without which this project could
not have been completed.
I would also like to thank my internal Guide YOGESH JADHAV for giving me the
necessary insight into my study.
The empirical findings in the report are based on the data collected by me. The
matter presented in this project is not copied from anywhere the university authorities
deem to be fit. This work has not been submitted for the award of any diploma or degree
or any other University.
This work is humbly submitted to Savitribai Phule Pune University for the award
of the Master of Business Administration.
Place:
Certificate
To the best of my knowledge and belief the work embodied in this project report has not
been submitted earlier for the award of any degree or similar title of this or any other
University or examining body.
Date: / / 2023
COMPANY GUIDE FEEDBACK LETTER (ON LETTERHEAD)
Contact details:
Methodology:
The research was conducted through a combination of surveys, customer
interviews, and data analysis. A sample of WNS (Aviva) motor
insurance policyholders was selected randomly to ensure
representativeness. The data collection process spanned a six-month
period, and the responses were analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively.
Key Findings:
INTRODUCTION
Objectives:-
1. To a certain the awareness of the policy holder on various aspects
of Motor vehicle insurance.
2. To know how well the Aviva are providing services.
COMPANY PROFILE
Company Analysis
Company Highlights
A. Data Collection:
1. Surveys and questionnaires to gather customer feedback
2. Analysis of customer complaints and grievances
3. Competitor benchmarking and comparison.
B. Data Analysis:
1. Quantitative analysis of survey data
2. Qualitative analysis of customer comments and feedback
C. Research Tools and Software:
1. Statistical analysis software Previous studies on customer
satisfaction in the insurance sector
D. Data Analysis and Findings:
1. Presentation of survey results
2. Overall customer satisfaction ratings
3. Analysis of customer feedback and comments
E. Identification of key factors affecting customer satisfaction:
1. Policy clarity and transparency
2. Claims settlement process.
3. Customer service and responsiveness
CHAPTER 4
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
2. Sample:
● Sampling Method: simple random sampling.
● Sampling Elements: The sampling elements for this study are
individuals in the Pune City.
5. Method of Analysis:
LITERATURE REVIEW
Interpretation: -
Out of all respondents the above pie chart shows that how long they
have been policyholder with WNS (Aviva) for motor vehicle
insurance 44% are less than 1 year, 38% are 1-3 years,
12% are more than 7 years and 6% are 4-6 years.
Type of coverage we have in our motor Percentage
vehicleinsurance policy
Comprehensive insurancepolicy 26%
Injury insurance policy 24%
Third party liability insurance policy 24%
Other insurance policy 10%
Collision coverage insurance policy 8%
Roadside assistance insurance policy 4%
Rental reimbursement insurance policy 2%
Interpretation: -
The given pie chart shows that the type of coverage do they have in
your motor vehicle insurance policy, 24% are having personal injury
insurance policy, 26% are having comprehensive insurance policy, 24%
are having third party liability insurance policy, 8% are having
collision coverage insurance policy, 4% are having roadside assistance
insurance policy, 2% are having rental reimbursement insurance policy
and 10% are not having any insurance policy.
The count of current policy deductible knows customers
Yes No
64% 36%
Interpretation:- The given pie chart shows that the count of current policy
deductible, 36% people don’t know about it and 64% people know about it.
Third party liability coverage in your Percentage
motor vehicleinsurance policy
To cover damage to your vehicle caused by a 32%
collision
To cover damages, you may cause to other 32%
people'sproperty or injuries to others
inan accident
To provide medical coverage for you and your 22%
passengers
To protect your vehicle from theft 16%
Interpretation :- The given pie chart shows that the purpose of third party liability
coverage in your motor vehicle insurance policy 32% is to cover damage to your
vehicle caused by a collision, 30% To cover damages you may cause to other
people's property or injuries to others in an accident, 22% To provide medical
coverage for you and your passengers and 16% To protect your vehicle from theft.
Comprehensive coverage typically covers in an Percentag
insurance policy e
Medical expenses for injuries in an accident 32%
Damage to your vehicle from non- collision events 32%
Interpretation: - The given pie chart shows that the comprehensive coverage
typically covers in an insurance policy 32% is for medical expenses for injuries in an
accident, 32% is for Damage to your vehicle in a collision, 32% is for Damage to your
vehicle from non- collision events and 4 is for Damage to another person's vehicle in
an accident.
Issues or challenges when interacting with Percentage
ourcustomer service
for long wait times 30%
difficulty in reaching a representative 26%
lack of knowledge or assistance 20%
other 16%
billing of payment issue 8%
Interpretation: -
Out of all respondents the above pie chart shows that issues or
challenges when interacting with Aviva’s customer service 30% are for
long wait times, 26% for difficulty in reaching a representative, 20%
for lack of knowledge or assistance, 16% for other and 8% for billing of
payment issue.
We provide with clear and understandable information about our
insurance policy when you singed up
Yes No
78% 22%
Interpretation: - The given pie chart shows that the count of where
they provide with clear and understandable information about your
insurance policy when you singed up, 22% people not signed and 78%
people signed.
Star Rating 1-5 customer service experience with Aviva
1-1.64 18%
1.64-2.29 20%
2.93-3.57 28%
3.57-4.21 18%
4.86-5 16%
Interpretation: - Out of all respondents the above graph shows that rate
of customer service experience with Aviva 9 are rate in between 1-1.64,
10 are rate in between 1.64-2.29, 14 are rate in between 2.93-3.57, 9 are
rate in between 3.57-
4.21 and 8 are rate in 4.86-5.50.
Star Rating 1-5 Transparency in terms of policy terms,
conditions and coverage details
1-1.64 10%
1.64-2.29 22%
2.93-3.57 26%
3.57-4.21 18%
4.86-5 24%
Interpretation: - Out of all respondents the above graph shows that rate
of Aviva’s transparency in terms of policy terms and conditions, and
coverage details, 5 are rate in between1-1.64, 11 are rate in between
1.64-2.29, 13 are rate in between 2.93-3.57, 9 are rate in between 3.57-
4.21and 12are rate in 4.86-5.50.
Customer considering using in future
Yes No
76% 24%
Interpretation:- The given pie chart shows that the count customer considering
using in the future, 24% customer not considered and 76%customer considered.
How long been with our company Customer
Less than 1 year 38%
1-3 years 38%
4-6 years 12%
More than 6 years 12%
Interpretation: -
Out of all respondents the above pie chart shows that how long
customer have been with our company 38% are less than 1 year, 38%
are 1-3 years, 12% are more than 7 years and 12% are 4-6 years.
Star Rating 1-5 Customers recommend to others
1-1.64 12%
1.64-2.29 18%
2.93-3.57 24%
3.57-4.21 26%
4.86-5 20%
Interpretation: - Out of all respondents the above graph shows that how
they likely recommend our company to others 6 are rate in between 1-
1.64, 9 are rate in between 1.64-2.29, 12 are rate in between 2.93-3.57,
13 are rate in
between 3.57-4.21 and 10 are rate in 4.86-5.50.
Star Rating 1-5 customer service experience with Aviva
1-1.64 21.42%
1.64-2.29 17.85%
2.93-3.57 26.78%
3.57-4.21 17.85%
4.86-5 16.07%
Interpretation: - Out of all respondents the above graph shows that how
they likely recommend our company to others 12 are rate in between 1-
1.64, 10 are rate in between 1.64-2.29, 15 are rate in between 2.93-3.57,
10 are rate in between 3.57-4.21 and 9 are rate in 4.86-5.50.
CHAPTER 7
• Since Aviva insurers had better capacity, many customers want to join
them. But their price is kept high. Therefore, public insurers should
revise their old rate chart and change their focus accordingly.
• Insurers in the private sector must allocate enough money to buy motor
Cranes as the problem is very much cited and commented by customers
in creating delay on post risk action. Insurers should swap information
with each other by working as collaborators instead of being enemies, as
information is reciprocal for mutual use, and they should play an active
role in loss prevention efforts.
• The best source for profit is giving good customer service. It can
therefore be said that good profit is a by-product of good customer
service. Profit almost automatically appears wherever there is a good
customer service. Customers follow customers through word-of-mouth
transmission advertisement. Therefore, insurers rather than competing
only by cutting price, they must use customer satisfactions as a
competition variable.
CHAPTER 8
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY/ REFERENCES
ANNEXURE
This section includes details about the project team, including their
names, roles, and contact information. It serves as a point of reference
forany further inquiries or discussions related to the project.