Eac Cat
Eac Cat
Eac Cat
E.A.C LAW
COURSEWORK
I, Gore Peter Charles Andrea, declare that the work embodied in this
paper is as a result of a series of research from different sources which I
compiled to form one uniform document.
TABLE OF CONTENT
Contents
DECLARATION ................................................................. I
TABLE OF CONTENT .......................................................................II
INTRODUCTION ……………….………............................................. 1
HISTORICAL CONTEXT ……………………………………… 2
FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY ……… …………………. 3
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK………… …………………… 4
INTRODUCTION
The Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Corporation in 1967
is a pivotal document in the history of regional cooperation on the
African continent. It laid the groundwork for the first East African
Corporation (EAC), a bold initiative aimed at fostering economic
integration and cooperation among East African nations. However, the
fate of this endeavor has long been a subject of debate, with many
asserting that the first EAC was doomed from the onset. This analysis
critically appraises the provisions of the 1967 Treaty to determine the
validity of this assertion.
The significance of this analysis lies in its exploration of the historical
and geopolitical complexities surrounding the formation and eventual
collapse of the first EAC. By examining the specific provisions of the
1967 Treaty, we can gain insights into the challenges faced by sovereign
nations when they come together to pursue regional integration. The
analysis not only offers a historical perspective but also provides valuable
lessons for understanding the delicate balance between national
sovereignty and regional cooperation.
The Treaty for the Establishment of the East African Corporation, signed
in 1967, set out a vision for collaboration among East African nations. It
outlined the principles, objectives, and mechanisms for achieving greater
economic and political integration in the region.
This analysis seeks to demonstrate that while the first East African
Corporation faced significant challenges, the assertion that it was doomed
from the onset is not entirely justifiable. By critically assessing the
provisions of the 1967 Treaty, we will explore the factors that contributed
to both the successes and failures of the EAC. The collapse of the first
EAC was influenced by a complex interplay of historical, political, and
structural factors, and the Treaty's provisions were just one aspect of this
intricate narrative.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
In the 1960s, the East African region was marked by the emergence of
newly independent states. Countries such as Kenya, Tanzania, and
Uganda had recently gained their independence from colonial powers.
These nations were grappling with the complexities of statehood, nation-
building, and the quest for economic development. The desire for
regional cooperation was fueled by a shared vision of harnessing their
collective potential.
Post-Colonial Aspirations
The post-colonial period was marked by high hopes for social and
economic progress. The newly independent nations sought to overcome
the legacy of colonialism, which had often left these countries with
fragmented economies and infrastructure. The idea of regional integration
in East Africa was rooted in the belief that collaboration could accelerate
development and strengthen the geopolitical position of the member
states on the international stage.
Political Challenges
Geopolitical Significance
The East African region faced both immense challenges and promising
aspirations. Member states aspired to improve infrastructure, boost trade,
and enhance the welfare of their populations. However, these aspirations
had to contend with the practical complexities of aligning economic
policies, managing political differences, and maintaining sovereignty.
In conclusion, the historical context in which the 1967 Treaty for the
Establishment of the East African Corporation was formed was
characterized by the post-colonial aspirations of newly independent
states, political diversity, and geopolitical significance. These factors,
alongside the challenges faced by East African states during that period,
played a significant role in shaping the establishment and eventual fate of
the first East African Corporation. To fully understand the justifiability of
the assertion that it was doomed from the onset, it's crucial to consider
how these historical dynamics interacted with the provisions of the
Treaty.
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
Functions
The Authority shall be responsible for, and have the general direction and
control of, the performance of the executive functions of the Community.
The Authority shall be assisted in the performance of its functions under
Article 48 by the councils and the East African Ministers.
The Authority may give directions to the Councils and to the East African
Ministers as to the performance of any functions conferred upon them,
and such directions shall be complied with.
The Authority shall review the state peace, security and goods
governance within the community and progress achieved towards the
establishment of a political federation of the states.
As head of states meet yearly with the purpose of discussing issues
hindering integration in various states
The agenda is to review the following;
The Authority is to meet at least once a year and reports are to be hold.
The tenure for the office of the chairperson shall be submitted in one year
and the office of chairperson shall be held in rotation among partner
states.
Decisions shall be consensus. And the summit shall only discuss business
submitted by the council and any matter bearing on the community.
FUNCTIONS
It shall be the responsibility of the EA ministers to assist the Authority in
the exercise of its executive functions to the extent required by and
subject to the directions of the Authority, and to advise the Authority
generally in respect of the affairs of the Community.
The EA ministers shall perform the functions conferred on them by the
treaty in respect of the Councils, the Assembly and other matters
The Authority may allocate particular responsibilities to each of the East
African Ministers.
The Authority may, in respect of any responsiblities which it confers
upon the East African Ministers, specify which matters shall be
performed by them acting in common agreement and which maybe
performed by a single East African Minister.
Negotiate bi-lateral air services agreements on behalf of the partner states
and to conduct such negotiations in accordance with the criteria laid
down by the Communications Ministerial Committee of the Common
Services Organization and any amendment of suvh criteria which maybe
made by the Communications Council.
THE COUNCILS
They are established as institutions of the Community and they include;
1. The Common Market Council which shall consist of the three East
African Ministers, together with nine other members, of whom three shall
be designated by each partner state from among the persons holding
office as minister of its government.
2. The Communications Authority which shall consist of the three East
African ministers together with other three members, being persons
holding office as ministers responsible for matters relating to
communications in the respective governments of the partner states
3. Economic Consultative Council which shall consist of the three East
African Ministers, together with nine other members, of whom three shall
be designated by each partner state from among persons holding office as
minister of its government.
4. The Finance which shall consist of the three East African Ministers
together with three other members, being persons holding office as
Ministers responsible for matters relating to public finance in the
respective Governments of the partner states.
5. The research and Social Council which shall consist of the three East
African Ministers, together with nine other members, of whom three shall
be designated by each partner state from among the persons holding
office as ministers of its Government.
Functions
The common market shall discharge the responsibilities imposed upon it
by Article 30 of the Treaty.
Communications council shall subject to any directions given by the
Authority, and subject to this treaty and to any law of the Community,
they shall perform the duties and have powers which are set out in the
Annex XIII to this Treaty, and shall provide a forum for consultation
generally on communication matters.
The Economic Consultative and planning council shall ;
(a) Assist the national planning of the partner states by consultative
means
(b) Advise the Authority upon the long term planning of the common
services.
One of the less publicized provisions of the East African Treaty for Co-
operation, Article 29 provides in a very general way for co-operation and
consultation among the partner states on a number of matters that can
potentially affect the efficient operation of the common market.
Subsection (b) of that Article provides that "the Counsel to the
Community shall advise the Partner States on, and endeavour to promote,
the harmonization of the commercial laws in operation in the Partner
States." This provision is reinforced by Article 2 of the Treaty, which lists
the general aims of the Community and includes among them "the
approximation of the commercial laws of the Partner States.
The impact these provisions may or should have on the existing
commercial laws in East Africa.
The non-customary laws of the different jurisdictions in East Africa are
already similar in most important respects. There are a number of reasons
for this similarity, the most important being the basic similarity in the
colonial experiences of the jurisdictions. The commercial laws of all East
Africa jurisdictions have been mostly drafted by British civil servants
who had a common social and educational background, who tended to
consult with counterpart officials in other colonies, and who were often
advised about the content of commercial laws by the Colonial Office in
London that was charged with administering all the British colonies.'
Despite the basic similarity of the commercial laws, however, there have
been recur· rent efforts to achieve even greater uniformity in the past few
decades.
The 1945 Colonial Office paper proposing the establishment of an East
African High Commission suggested that the High Commission have
considerable power to legislate in commercial law areas,' but this
proposal was subsequently dropped and the 1947 Order in Council did
not vest such power in the High Commission that it established.
• The 1961 Raisman report, which immediately preceded the foundation
of E.A.C.S.O., again proposed that the Central Legislative Assembly be
empowered to enact commercial legislation that would be effective
throughout East Africa.
As before, however, the proposal was not accepted and the Central
Legislative Assembly operating under the E.A.C.S.O. agreement lacked
authority to legislate in commercial law areas, Since 1961 a number of
commentators who have championed the cause of greater East African
unity have argued that there is a need for greater uniformity of
commercial laws, and some have even lamented what they perceive to be
a trend towards dissimilarity since independence.
Articles 2 and 29 (b) of the Treaty for Co-operation appear to be a
product of this drive for further unification of the commercial laws, The
wording of the Articles, however, raises two problems in determining
their intended impact. First, they use the term "commercial laws" to
define the
scope of the provisions. Although this term is often used in the legal
profession,there is no uniformly accepted precise definition· of it, nor
does the Treaty for Co-operation provide one. For two reasons, however,
this difficulty does not pose as serious a problem as might be supposed.
First, neither Article has any immediate effect; Article 29 (b) only calls
on the Counsel to the Community to advise the partner states on the
harmonization of commercial laws and Article 2 only lists the general
long term goals of the Community. Implicitly, therefore, the partner states
have reserved the authority to make the ultimate decision on the content
of their commerci3J laws. Still the provisions have some importance in
that they commit the different governments, in making these decisions, to
consider the interrelationship between their "commercial laws" and
those of the other governments. Secondly, other provisions of the Treaty
indicate some limitations on the potential impact of Articles 2 and 29 (b).
Various provisions of the Treaty declare certain discriminatory
commercial practices to be "incompatible with this Treaty,''8 provide for
continuation of the East African Industrial Licensing Laws,9 provide for
coordination on taxation policies, charge the Communications Council
with the duty of consulting with the partner states on co-ordination of
surface transport policies, II and deal with a number of other laws which
affect commerce.
Presumably ;Article 2 should not be interpreted as possibly committing
the partner states to anything in consistent with these other provisions,
nor should Article 29 (b) be read to authorize the Counsel to promote
legislation inconsistent with other Treaty provisions.
The Council to the Community and the partner states can still act to
promote "harmonization" of laws in these areas to the extent possible
without conflicting with the other treaty provisions-indeed it is to be
hoped that the Counsel will offer his advice on as wide a range of matters
as possible-but the potential impact of Articles 2 and 29 (b) on laws
affecting commerce that are dealt with elsewhere in the treaty is certainly
less than it is on other laws affecting commerce.
The chairman of the assembly shall preside over and take part in its
proceedings in accordance with the rules of procedure of the assembly
made by the Authority.
Legislation
EALA has passed many statutes a number which are very fundamental to
the EAC integration process.
This not only ensures that the agenda for the regional block is centered on
the people, but it also ensures that it is capable of meeting the ongoing
needs of the people in a manner that is sustainable. The body participates
in a law making process, which has guaranteed that the laws that it passes
are critical to the integration of the area.
The EAC Human and People's Rights Act from 2011, the EA Conflict
Management Act from 2011, and the Inter-University Council of East
Africa (Amendment) Act from 2011 are a few examples of laws that fall
under this category. These laws enacted takes precedence over similar
national laws on matters pertaining to the community .
Representation
The EALA serves as a democratic link between the institutions of EAC
and the people of East Africa. It is the people’s voice for the citizens of
East Africa about policies of their government to EAC.It has been able to
achieve this through public hearings, workshops and public rallies on all
the major stages of integration and legislation.