Paper DUEL
Paper DUEL
Paper DUEL
11 November 2014
In many ways, Duel in the Sun (1947) was an ‘oddball’ among 1940s motion pictures.
David O. Selznick, the producer and creative mind behind the film, set out to make a big
grossing film (Schatz 342) and, to achieve that, he adapted a pulp fiction novel that combined
western and melodrama, sex and violence. Although the movie includes a frontier conflict
between the West and the East, its main plot line is centered around the love - hate
relationship of Pearl Chávez, a mestiza, and the ‘wild’ McCanles brother, Lewton. The film
includes scenes with the protagonist covered only with a sarape, bathing nude in a pond and
killing herself to death with the male lead. Although the film had the PCA approval seal, the
National Legion of Decency only granted it a “B” rating after Selznick had agreed to make
additional cuts and add a moralistic prologue and epilogue. Duel was also the most expensive
film to date (Black 48), with a production cost between five and six million dollars, and
Nevertheless, behind its risqué technicolor images and record budget, the movie
reflects the changing social attitudes of its time, much like any other 1940s Hollywood film.
Although Duel in the Sun mainly upholds traditional race, sexuality and gender ideologies,
dissenting discourses about race, sexuality and gender issues problematize its outright
characterization as ‘conservative’.
The movie traces the protagonist’s failed attempts of fulfilling her father’s death wish:
for Pearl to become a lady. She commits a sexual transgression that she tries to amend
Guerrero del Pozo 2
throughout the film, but both McCanles brothers, Lewton and Jesse, thwart her efforts.
Therefore, Pearl appears as the victim of white society. In a way, the film seems to try to
rescue her non-white identity, following a trend that started in the War Period of putting Latin
Americans on screen as lead actors. However, this should not be taken as a critical dissent to
southern aristocracy. By equating ‘good’ to ‘being a white, prim lady’, the movie is in fact
reaffirming white supremacy. This attitude is reflected in the ambiguity of her ethnic identity
femininity. Again, by suggesting that what is morally right is for women to remain in the
private sphere waltzing and making small talk—as does Jesse at one point in the film—, the
movie is upholding Victorian sexuality and traditional genre roles. Indeed, in a scene where
the Sinkiller—a preacher-like character—purifies Pearl, he gives a speech tracing back to the
Pearl. There are several moments in which she appears as a strong and independent heroine,
the most remarkable of which is perhaps when she is heading to her death at Squaw’s Head
Rock. In fact, her nature as a cowgirl releases her from the ties to the private sphere and
grants her the freedom of movement other female characters lack. In another break from
traditional gender representations, Laura Bell, the mother of the McCanles family, stands up
for herself after years of submissiveness to her husband, the ‘Senator’, and he, on the other
In adapting Niven Busch’s novel to the big screen, O. Selznick made two significant
changes that have an impact over the film’s discourse about non-white groups. One of them is
Guerrero del Pozo 3
the inclusion of a sequence that explains the reasons behind Pearl’s strong desire for
becoming a lady. The first scenes of the movie show her father, a run-down Creole aristocrat,
murder her mother, a non-white woman, for cheating on him. Before being hanged for his
crime, he asks her to go to live with the McCanles, “I want you to lean on Laura Belle. Make
her your inspiration and your guide, and then one day you'll be the great lady I've always
Pearl seems keen to follow her father’s advice and, to guard her virtue, she adopts an
unfriendly attitude towards men. Initially, she even seems to distrust the kind and cultured
Jesse McCanles. Upon her arrival to Paradise Flats, the closest town to the McCanles ranch,
Pearl answers to his attempts of getting information with an unfriendly remark: “Now you go
'way! I know all about men like you!” Sensing his brother’s intentions with her, Jesse asks
Lewton further along the movie: “Why don't you leave this one alone? She may do very
nicely - if given half a chance.” Laura Bell’s warning to Pearl upon their first meeting explain
She fights Lewton’s sexual advances, but both brothers tamper with her good
intentions. Lewton does so irreparably by seducing her, refusing to marry her—what would
alleviate her mistake—and killing her fiancé to stop her marriage to someone else. What is
significant, though, is that the civilized and polite Jesse is also portrayed as partially
responsible for her corruption. When he walks in on Pearl and Lewton after they have had
sex, he confesses his love for Pearl, “I thought of what you'd be like when you grew up a
little,” but says that he will never be able to forget what he saw. After his departure she is left
wracked with woe, only composing herself after thinking, “All right, Jesse. . .You said you'd
never forget. . .” From this point on in the movie she stops resisting Lewton and becomes
“his girl”.
Guerrero del Pozo 4
In the script, Jesse’s responsibility is implied more directly. When they meet again
later in the movie, Jesse apologizes for exaggerating the importance of her sexual encounter
with Lewton and adds, “I hope it didn't make any difference.” At this point, the script notes:
“A moment's silence as Pearl absorbs this bitterly; the only "difference" it made was her
entire life!” (Selznick 184, shot 562). When he finally comes to her ‘rescue’, it is too late for
Both brothers represent opposite spectrums of the semantic structure of the Western,
Jesse symbolizing the civilization and Lewton, the wilderness, and so they have a Cain - Abel
relationship. What they do have in common is their social status as white aristocrats.
Following the structure of melodrama, the film places her as a victim of her milieu,
specifically white aristocracy. The denouement, her melodramatic death, adds a final pathetic
At first, then, the film might appear to take a critical position against racial status quo,
the process, the film reveals a patronizing stand towards non-white groups, something that
becomes evident when trying to place her ethnic identity with precision. Most elements seem
to point at her being of Mexican-Latin American origin. She carries some of the elements of
the costume of Mexican indigenous groups (“Clothing”) and the charrería (Sands), such as
the sombrero and the sarape. Her father is described as a Creole, a descendant of Spanish
settlers in Latin America. However, the Senator insults her by using words related to the
Native Americans: “papoose,” “squaw” and “wigwam,” whereas Lewton describes her as a
“cute tamale,” a South American dish. The actress herself is a Latina version of the minstrel;
Jennifer Jones features as the white woman she is with a painted brown face and messy hair.
Guerrero del Pozo 5
In consonance with this racist view of her ethnical identity, she exhibits child-like
attitudes in the first third of the film that relate to the nineteenth century notion of the Noble
Savage, which considered “more primitive peoples of the past […] existed in a “golden age”
in harmony with nature, and were therefore more simple, childlike, and blessed, whereas
civilized people of the modern era lived at odds with nature and were thus more alienated and
unhappy” (Barry). That this concept is prevalent in the movie is prevalent upon examining
the film’s script. Shortly after meeting Jesse, she is willing to innocently take off her black
dress in the middle of nowhere and change into a more colorful outfit to please him. The
script describes this scene: “(she gets an idea; innocently, like a savage child) I'll put it on
now” [emphasis added] (Selznick 20, shot 49). Similar uses of the word ‘savage’ appear at
least five times throughout the script in similar contexts. This initial child-like characterization
further accentuates her status as an innocent victim who white society corrupts.
Another way in which the racist portrayal of her ethnicity is evident in the film is
when examining her sexuality. Following the stereotype of the “sexy Latina”, her ethnic
identity appears to be the cause for her intense sexual impulse. Her depiction as lascivious
woman fits the trend of dialectic female representations in post war Hollywood films, the
sexy femme fatale represented by Pearl and the beautiful yet bland woman embodied by
Helen Langford, Jesse’s fiancé. However, in this film, Pearl and her mother, both Latinas, are
the only female characters who seem to have such an intense libido. ‘Trash’ is code word she
repeatedly uses to describe her condition as a sexual transgressor. So, in a line such as, “I
guess I'm just trash - like my Ma,” she implies her sexual instinct is something predetermined
by her race and, thus, out of her control. This is something Pearl suggests: “I couldn't help it,
Jesse. You just can't go away believin'. . . I tried hard - honest I did!”
Guerrero del Pozo 6
The racist conception of her ethnic identity, linked to a strong, ‘inherent’ sexual
desire, can also explain the seemingly inconsistent mood changes the character goes through
in the film. A particularly revealing case is the scene where Lewton first seduces Pearl. It is
usually referred to as the ‘rape scene’, although O. Selznick never meant for it to be such. He
resented the Legion for cutting a passionate kiss they share, since that helped the viewer
understand that the sex was consensual (qtd. in Black 55). However, the kiss only makes her
later reactions even more confusing. After struggling with Lewton for a few seconds—the
script originally featured a longer struggle, but these shots were cut—, a thunder strikes. She,
then, suddenly changes her attitude, embracing Lewton and consenting to the act. The movie
establishes a connection between her ‘primitive, animalistic’ self and the natural elements, as
a result of which the thunder seems to have ‘magically’ activated her libido. When she seems
to have fallen out of the trance, she is completely crushed. Jesse walks in to her room after
they have had sex and she is focused in a close-shot, crying and devastated, as if the whole
humiliates herself before Lewton. The aim of these scenes seems to be to portray the
enslaving powers of sexuality, almost as part of a cautionary tale showing the dangers of
transgressing traditional sexual norms. One of the most pathetic ones occurs after Lewton has
killed Sam, the ranch’s cowhand who was going to marry her. When he sneaks into her room,
at first she points at him with a gun. He does not have to make a great effort, though, for her
her to jump into his arms. The scene ends with her holding to his leg and being dragged
through her room, begging for him to take her to Mexico with him. The ending presents a
similar episode, in which she goes to another of her mood shifts when Lewton calls for her to
Guerrero del Pozo 7
come to him and she answers immediately, crawling towards him since she is fatally
wounded.
However, her sexuality in the film has also a strong liberating power. There are also
episodes as equally striking as her pathetic ones in which she is portrayed as a strong,
independent woman. In fact, driven by her ‘savage’ nature, from the very beginning she
seems to be strong and have a general anti-masculine rhetoric She even doubts of the
educated Jesse when first meeting him, and dismisses him by saying a line she will repeat at
other points during the film: “I know all about men like you!” The climatic episode in her
depiction as an independent woman is in her path towards Squaw’s Head Rock to kill
Lewton. Much like a contemporary heroine, she crosses rivers and climb mountains, on her
Her independence seems to be increased after she commits the sexual transgression.
Even if at first she appears to be intimidated by Lewton, when she consummates their
relationship those fears go away, something the script indicates: “From this point on she is on
the terms of an equal, without fright - but an equal who at one and the same time is ridden
with passion and contempt” [emphasis added] (Selznick 113, shot 389). This description in
the script suggests that in her transgression she has found parity. To put it in another way, the
sexual parameters of the sexuality, even if Victorian, seem to apply in the movie to both men
and women. This sense of parity is evident in a remark Sam, Pearl’s fiancé, makes. After he
proposed, he says that he does not care if she has been with Lewton: “Pearl, I've knocked
around plenty. Who am I to -.” Even more symptomatic of the changing attitudes towards
sexuality is Jesse’s apology for giving to much importance to Pearl’s premarital sex.
Even if the film idealizes the passive role of women in the private sphere, it also
depicts Pearl as freed from some of the traditional gender roles assigned to women. Westerns
Guerrero del Pozo 8
usually include a cowboy that shares elements of both East and West and mediates the central
frontier conflict of the film (Simon). However, lacking this central character, the role seems
to fall partially on Pearl. She is not involved in the solution of the frontier conflict of the film
but she is situated between the civilization and the wilderness, starting from the fact that she
is ‘half-breed.’ Although she is wild, rough, uneducated, her desire to be a lady and her strong
ties to the characters of the movie associated with civilization—her father, Laura and Jesse—
also place her in the East. Her ability to ride, associated with the wilderness, gives her the
The breeches in traditional gender roles are not exclusive of the ‘crazy Latina’ of the
film. The movie includes a ‘Girls Choose’ dance number, asserting women as active rather
than passive beings. However, this is more evident in the evolution of the relationship
between Laura Bell and her husband, ‘Senator’ Jackson McCanles. The latter’s authority is
deteriorated throughout the film. The first key moment in that respect comes when he is in
the midst of the frontier conflict. Up until then, he has been the archetype of the West. He is
rough, uncultured, impulsive; he rejects progress and all that could be associated with it,
including his son Jesse. When workers arrive to the limit of the family’s property to build the
railroad tracks, the Senator gathers all the men of the ranch and threatens to shoot at them,
even though they have the legal authority to do the work. However, he caves in to the
authority of the US Cavalry unit, saying that he will not fight the flag he once fought for. This
Hollywood post-war films. In this context, it serves to mark the point where the Senator’s
Other moments that mark his deterioration come in his interactions with Laura. The
latter stands up to him when he wants to throw Pearl out of the house. This represents a
Guerrero del Pozo 9
discussing the events that left him in a wheelchair, the Senator acknowledges that his
unjustified jealousy led him to ride recklessly through the night to get Laura back. So, he
recognizes that it was his mistakes that left him disabled and not Laura’s, as he has deceived
himself into thinking up to that point. The distrust in their relationship is an indicator of the
downbeat America of the post war Hollywood in which love is not the perfect ideal anymore.
In the film, the Senator’s acknowledgment of his faults marks the symbolic defeat of the
West, as evident from his forgiveness of Jesse, and it reveals the changing attitudes of the
period towards gender roles. He is not the proud macho patriarch he was before but a humble,
The conflicting race, sexual and gender representations of the movie are best
summarized in the parallel of Laura’s and Pearl’s deaths. The movie sets them on equal
ground since both, white and Latina, crawl towards the men they love. The scene symbolizes
female subjection to men, since both women are dragging themselves. At least Lewton is also
fatally wounded—although he appears to be in a better shape than Pearl—, but the Senator is
not. However, both of them are approaching men that have finally changed, even in the last
attitude evident throughout the film, and Laura crawls into a crying Senator who has
acknowledge his fault over the conflictive relationship they have had over the years.
Even as part of a genre that is supposed to uphold the traditional American values,
Duel reflects the changing ideas about gender and race in Hollywood while still presenting a
mainly conservative ideology. Although upholding traditional sexuality, the film reveals an
increasingly complex discourse around sexuality that initiated with the war period. It even
suggests a moderate sexual equality between genders and downgrades Pearl’s transgressions
Guerrero del Pozo 10
through the actions of a positive character of the film, Jesse. The film continues the trend of
presenting Latino characters that started in the war period, although these characterizations
are patronizing and racist, thus upholding the supremacy of white values.
O. Selznick’s film has not aged well. For the contemporary viewer, the sexual
violence, the racist representations of the African American and Latino characters and the
laughter. However, what is particularly sad is to see that the racist representation of the
Latina, understandable in its time, is still present in the entertainment industry. What is more,
it is as successful as it was back then, as evident from Sofía Vergara’s case, the Highest Paid
TV actress for three years in a row now for her representation in Modern Family (Le). After
67 years, at least the actress that plays this Latina woman is a Colombian and not a white
Works Cited
Jacobs, Lea. The Wages of Sin : Censorship and the Fallen Woman Film, 1928-1942.
American Film Institute. “Note.” Duel in the Sun. American Film Institute, 2014. Web. 9 Nov.
2014.
Black, Gregory D. The Catholic Crusade Against the Movies, 1940-1975. Cambridge; New
"Clothing in Colonial Spanish America." Iberia and the Americas: Culture, Politics, and
History. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2005. Credo Reference. Web. 11 November 2014.
Le, Vanna. "Sofia Vergara Is (Once Again) The Highest-Paid TV Actress." Forbes. Forbes
Sands, Kathleen. "Charrería." Encyclopedia of Mexico: History, Society & Culture. London:
Schatz, Thomas. Boom and Bust : The American Cinema in the 1940s. New York: Scribner,
1997. Print.
Selznick, David Oliver. Duel in the Sun (1946): Shooting script. Adapted by: Garrett, Oliver
H.P. Electronic Edition by Alexander Street Press, L.L. C., 2009. Copyright © 1946,
Simon, William. “Genre.” Film Form and Film Sense. New York University, New York. 3