Convection Diffusion and Reaction Inside
Convection Diffusion and Reaction Inside
Convection Diffusion and Reaction Inside
1. Introduction intraparticle mass transport is not only due to diffusion but also
due to convection inside the pores. In the present article, our
Oscillatory flow has been an interesting subject of study for aim is to discuss the mass transport inside a spherical porous
years. Many applications of oscillatory flow to engineering prob- catalyst in an oscillatory flow in which the convection–diffusion
lems have been investigated. Some of the examples are electro- process is coupled with isothermal first order reaction kinetics.
chemical reactors [1], soils [2], biofilms [3], and ultrafiltration [4]. The coupling of chemical kinetics and mass transport process in
It is well known that the mass transfer of a species is enhanced by porous catalytic particles has been the subject of intense study for
several orders of magnitude when it is present in a fluid medium a long time. An extensive study of the earlier work can be found
subjected to oscillatory motion. There are several examples of mass in the treatise, The Mathematical Theory of Diffusion and Reaction in
transfer processes where oscillatory flow plays an important role. Permeable Catalysts by Aris [8]. In fact, several studies have shown
that the total transport rate inside the particle can be enhanced
Mass transport enhancement via oscillatory flow has been stud-
significantly due to the contribution of intraparticle convection in
ied for numerous geometries: a curved tube (Eckmann and Grot-
large-pore catalysts. The importance of intraparticle convection on
berg [5]), a flexible tube (Dragon and Grotberg [6]), a tube with
catalyst particles is shown by Komiyama and Inoue [9]. They solved
conductive walls (Jiang and Grotberg [7]) and many more. the problem of intraparticle convection–diffusion and reaction in
Large-pore permeable particles are currently used as catalysts a finite cylinder parallel to the flow for a first order reaction
adsorbents, high performance liquid chromatography packing, and provided a technique to obtain the intraparticle velocity.
supports for biomass growth, ceramic membranes. The concept A theoretical justification describing the effect of intraparticle
behind various applications is that in large-pore materials convection for an irreversible, isothermal first order reaction is
given by Nir and Pismen [10] for rectangular (slab), cylindrical and
spherical geometries.
∗ The problem of convection and diffusion in permeable isother-
Corresponding author. Tel.: +91 3222 283684.
E-mail addresses: rajas@maths.iitkgp.ernet.in, rajasgp@gmail.com
mal particles was discussed by Rodrigues et al. [11] and the anal-
(G.P. Raja Sekhar). ogy between slab and spherical geometries was established. Lu
1 Part of work is done while the corresponding author is at Institute for Applied et al. [12] extended this convection–diffusion study to convec-
Analysis and Numerical Simulation, University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 57, D tion–diffusion–reaction study with first order reaction. Convec-
70569 Stuttgart, Germany as Alexander von Humboldt Experienced Researcher. tive flow inside non-isothermal catalyst was studied by Rodrigues
0997-7546/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2010.05.002
484 J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493
−iρωVe = −∇ P e + µ∇ 2 Ve , (5) It may be noted that Eq. (9) which is the Stokes equation in the
e case of oscillatory flow is mathematically similar to the Brinkman
∇ · V = 0. (6)
equation that is frequently used for porous media except that the
Here V and P represent the velocity and pressure fields outside
e e
meaning of the parameter λ is different. Hence, some features of
the porous pellet, and Vi and P i are those of the flow inside the the existence theory for the Brinkman equation can be adopted.
porous pellet. The physical quantities are non-dimensionalized by Padmavathi et al. [22] have assumed that any velocity vector and
using the variables X̃ = Xa , Ṽ = UV , P̃ = PU . Here U is the pressure scalar satisfying equations of the form Eqs. (9) and (10)
µa
can be expressed as
magnitude of the far field uniform velocity. Therefore, the non-
dimensional equations for the flow inside the porous region (r < Ve = ∇ × ∇ × (Ae X) + ∇ × (Be X), (11)
1) take the form
∂
P e = p0 + [r (∇ 2 − λ2 )Ae ], (12)
Vi = −Da∇ P i , (7) ∂r
∇ · Vi = 0, (8) where X is the position vector of the current point, p0 is a
constant, and Ae and Be are unknown scalar functions satisfying the
and the corresponding equations for the fluid region (r > 1) equations
reduce to
∇ 2 (∇ 2 − λ2 )Ae = 0, (∇ 2 − λ2 )Be = 0. (13)
(∇ 2 − λ2 )Ve = ∇ P e , (9)
Moreover, Raja Sekhar et al. [23] have shown via solenoidal
∇ · Ve = 0, (10) decomposition of the velocity vector that the expressions given
2
where λ2 = − iωνa , and Da = ak2 is the Darcy number. Note that in Eqs. (11)–(13) form the general solution of Brinkman equation.
Furthermore, this complete general solution has been used to solve
we have omitted the symbol ˜ from Eqs. (7)–(10).
problems dealing with viscous flow past porous objects [24–26].
In the present investigation, we employ this complete general
2.1. Boundary conditions solution. Let us now assume that the velocity field V0 of the basic
flow, i.e., of the unperturbed flow in the absence of any boundaries
The obvious boundary condition at a permeable interface is is given by
the continuity of the normal velocity, which is consequence of
the incompressibility. In order to have a completely determined V0 = ∇ × ∇ × (A0 X) + ∇ × (B0 X), (14)
∞ h
flow of the free fluid, some condition on the tangential component X i
of the free fluid velocity needs to be specified at the interface. A0 = αn r n + βn fn (λr ) Sn (θ, ϕ),
n=1
Classically, vanishing of the tangential velocity of the free fluid
at the porous interface was supposed. However, this condition ∞
X
is not satisfactory for porous interface. Beavers and Joseph [19] B0 = γn fn (λr )Tn (θ, ϕ), (15)
proposed a new condition postulating that the difference between n=1
the slip velocity of the free fluid and the tangential component where Sn (θ , ϕ) and Tn (θ , ϕ) are spherical harmonics of the form
of seepage velocity is proportional to the shear rate of free
n
fluid. They have verified this law experimentally and found that X
Sn (θ, ϕ) = Pnm (ζ )(Anm cos mϕ + Bnm sin mϕ), ζ = cos θ , (16)
the proportionality constant depends linearly on square root of
m= 0
permeability. Saffman further studied the experimental boundary
n
condition of Beavers and Joseph and pointed out that the seepage X
velocity was much smaller than the other quantities hence may Tn (θ, ϕ) = Pnm (ζ )(Cnm cos mϕ + Dnm sin mϕ), ζ = cos θ , (17)
m=0
be dropped [20]. In general, while matching Darcy’s law with the
Stokes equation, continuity of pressure and continuity of normal where Pnm are associated Legendre polynomials and Anm , Bnm , Cnm ,
velocity components are used along with Saffman’s slip condition Dnm are the known coefficients. The coefficients αn , βn , γn are
for tangential velocity components [21]. Looker and Carnie [18] arbitrary constants and corresponding to a given basic flow in the
showed that Saffman’s boundary condition can be applied for absence of any boundaries, αn , βn , γn take a suitable form. For
oscillatory Stokes flows at least under low frequency. The example in case of uniform flow along the z-axis, we have α1 =
486 J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493
1/2, β1 = 0, γ1 = 0. In addition, the scalar functions A0 and B0 (1 − l2 λ2 )Z1 + (l2 λ2 + 2){X1 g1 (λ) + λ(α + l)(1 − l2 λ2 )g2 (λ)} g1 (λr )
satisfy Eq. (13). It may be noted that the scalars Ae , Be represent the −
2rZ1 g1 (λ)
flow field and the vector equations are now reduced to equivalent
scalar equations.
On the other hand, if the basic flow with the velocity field V0 × cos θ, (21)
is perturbed by the presence of a stationary porous pellet with the
radius r = 1, then the velocity field Ve of the resulting flow outside X1 g1 (λ) + λ(α + l)(1 − l2 λ2 )g2 (λ) 2
Vθe = − 1 − − g1 (λr ) − λg2 (λr )
the porous pellet is given by Ve = V0 + V∗ , where V∗ is the velocity r 3 Z1 r
due to the disturbance flow such that V∗ → 0 as r → ∞. It may
be noted that in the above decomposition, the basic flow as well as
(1 − l2 λ2 )Z1 + (l2 λ2 + 2){X1 g1 (λ) + λ(α + l)(1 − l2 λ2 )g2 (λ)}
the perturbed flow are oscillatory in nature. Hence, the resulting
×
flow in the exterior region (r > 1) is given by 2Z1 g1 (λ)
∞ h
αn′ i
(22)
X
Ae = αn r n + + βn fn (λr ) + βn′ gn (λr ) Sn (θ , ϕ), (18) × sin θ,
n= 1
r n+1
and inside the porous pellet (r < 1)
∞ h
Vri = −l2 δ1 cos θ,
i
(23)
X
Be = γn fn (λr ) + γn′ gn (λr ) Tn (θ , ϕ), (19)
n=1 i 2
Vθ = l δ1 sin θ, (24)
where fn (λr ) and gn (λr ) are modified spherical Bessel functions
where
of first and second kind, respectively. Since in the porous region h i
(r < 1) the pressure field is harmonic and finite at the origin, it λ2 (lλ2 − 6α − 6l)g1 (λ) + 3λ(α + l)g2 (λ)
can be expressed as δ1 = ,
Z1
∞
and δ1 , X1 , and Z1 correspond to δn , Xn , and Zn when n = 1. The
X
P i = p0 + δn r n Sn (θ , ϕ), (20)
explicit solution calculated above for the hydrodynamic problem
n=1
has been used in order to evaluate the nutrient transport via the
where (r , θ, ϕ) are spherical coordinates with respect to the origin combined convection–diffusion–reaction equation (25).
chosen at the center of the sphere r = 1. In the above expressions The use of Saffman condition brings limitations on the
αn′ , βn′ , γn′ and δn are unknown constants that are determined from permeability range. Looker and Carnie [18] concluded that Saffman
the boundary conditions and are obtained in terms of the known condition is applicable under low frequency. Vainshtein and
coefficients αn , βn and γn as follows: Shapiro [27] calculated the force acting on a permeable particle
αn′ = (n + 1) in oscillatory flow using the Brinkman and the Darcy equation.
h i However, they have used continuity of velocity components
{Xn gn (λ) + λ(α + l)(1 − l2 λ2 )gn+1 (λ)}αn + λ(α + l)Yn βn together with the continuity of stress components. It may be
× , noted that in case of Brinkman equation these boundary conditions
Zn are accepted by a large community, whereas in case of Darcy
(n + 1){(1 − l λ )αn + fn (λ)βn } + (n + 1 + nl2 λ2 )αn′
2 2
equation, the continuity of tangential velocity needs to be replaced
βn′ = − , by Beavers–Joseph/ Saffman type slip condition. Vainshtein and
(n + 1)gn (λ)
Shapiro
√ [27] identified a critical value of the Brinkman parameter,
γn {(α − nl)fn (λ) − lλfn+1 (λ)}
γn′ = , a/ k, that controls the applicability of Darcy equation. They
(nl − α)gn (λ) − lλgn+1 (λ) also observed that this critical value diminishes with decreasing
δn = λ2 {nαn′ − (n + 1)αn }, frequency of oscillations and reaches that of a non-oscillating
particle ≈10. It seems that critical value can be as large as 200
where
for high frequency of oscillations. For low and moderate values
Xn = λ2 {l2 (n + 1)α − l3 (n2 + λ2 − 1) − l}, of frequency, one can identify the corresponding critical value
of the Brinkman parameter. Hence, the hydrodynamic problem
Yn = fn (λ)gn+1 (λ) + fn+1 (λ)gn (λ),
h of oscillatory flow past a porous sphere with Darcy equation
Zn = l{n(n + 1)(n + 2) − (n2 + λ2 − 1)(nλ2 l2 + n + 1)} inside subject to Saffman condition limits one to consider only a
i particular range of permeability.
+ α(n + 1)(nλ2 l2 + 2n + 1) gn (λ)
− λ(α + l)(nλ2 l2 + n + 1)gn+1 (λ), 3. Nutrient transport inside the porous pellet
√
l= Da. The hydrodynamic velocity components internal to the porous
The velocity components both outside and inside the pellet can pellet that are computed in the previous section are incorporated
be obtained using the above expressions. In case of uniform in the definition of the combined transport–reaction problem. In
what follows a solution is presented for the case of a spherical
flow along z-axis, setting V0 = U k̂, we may notice that the
porous catalyst. Assuming an isothermal first order reaction
corresponding expressions for A0 and B0 in dimensionless form are
kinetics and diffusivity D, the nutrient mass balance can be written
A0 = 21 r cos θ, B0 = 0. Comparing with the general expressions
as
given in Eq. (15), we have α1 = 12 , β1 = 0 and γ1 = 0. In this case,
the corresponding velocity components in fluid region (r > 1) are Vi · ∇ ci = D∇ 2 ci − k′ ci . (25)
On using the expressions for velocity V given in Eqs. (23) and (24),
i
X1 g1 (λ) + λ(α + l)(1 − l2 λ2 )g2 (λ) we have from Eq. (25)
Vre = 1 +
r 3 Z1
− Ul2 δ1 k̂ · ∇ ci = D∇ 2 ci − k′ ci .
(26)
J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493 487
Eq. (25) applies to a spherical pellet with a concentration boundary With respect to the inner product
condition at the porous–liquid interface equal to the bulk nutrient Z 1
concentration
hf , g i = f (x)g (x)dx, (39)
−1
ci = c0 on r = a. (27)
the differential operator of Eq. (36) is self-adjoint and its
Now, the physical quantities are non-dimensionalized by using eigenfunctions are orthogonal. Using this inner product, Eqs. (34)
ci
the variables X̃ = Xa , c̃ = c . After non-dimensionalization the and (35) can be projected to the eigenfunction space, yielding
0
governing equation together with the boundary condition is given ! !
by 2 Pe2 l4 δ12 1 ∂
∂ Hn 2 1
φ + Hn = 2 ξ − n(n + 1) Hn , (40)
4 ξ ∂ξ ∂ξ ξ2
−Pe l2 δ1 k̂ · ∇ c̃ = ∇ 2 c̃ − φ 2 c̃, (28)
Z +1 !
c̃ = 1, on r = 1, (29) 2 Pe l2 δ1 ζ
Hn (1) = exp Pn (ζ )dζ . (41)
with 2n + 1 −1 2
k′ a2 Ua The solution of Eq. (40) with Eq. (41) as boundary condition is given
φ2 = , Pe = , (30) by the following series:
D D
where φ is the Thiele modulus corresponding to the above problem Hn (ξ ) = an (ξ )n Fn (ξ ). (42)
and Pe is the Peclet number. The solution of Eq. (28) with boundary
condition (29) is obtained by introducing the transformation Therefore Eq. (40) reduces to the form
!
(2n + 1) ′ Pe2 l4 δ12
!
Pe l2 δ1 z ′′
Fn + 2
Fn − φ + Fn = 0, (43)
c̃ = ĉ exp − , z = r cos θ, (31) ξ 4
2
which reduces Eq. (28) to the form since ξ is a regular singular point of Eq. (43), we assume the
solution of the form
Pe2 l4 δ12 ∞
ĉ = (∇ 2 − φ 2 )ĉ in r < 1. (32) X
4 Fn (ξ ) = bm ξ m , (44)
m=0
The corresponding boundary condition takes the form
! and solve Eq. (43). As a result, we get b1 = 0 and obtain the
Pe l2 δ1 cos θ following recurrence relation
ĉ = exp , on r = 1. (33)
2 !
Pe2 l4 δ12
In spherical coordinates, (r , θ, ϕ), Eqs. (32) and (33) become
φ2 + 4
bm = bm−2 . (45)
m(m + 2n + 1)
! !
2 Pe2 l4 δ12 2 ∂ ĉ 1 ∂
φ + ĉ = 2 ξ Since b1 = 0, bm = 0, m = 1, 3, 5, . . . , and for m even say
4 ξ ∂ξ ∂ξ
" # m = 2j, the expression for bm becomes
1 ∂ 2 ∂ ĉ
+ 2 (1 − ζ ) in r < 1, (34) !
ξ ∂ζ ∂ζ Pe2 l4 δ12
φ2 + 4
!
Pe l2 δ1 ζ b2j = b2j−2 . (46)
ĉ = exp , on ξ = 1 (35) 2j(2j + 2n + 1)
2
Eq. (46) can be written as
where ξ = r , ζ = cos θ . The differential operator with respect to !
ζ of Eq. (34) has the following form: 2 Pe2 l4 δ12
j
φ + 4
(L + χ)ψ = 0, (36) Y
b2j = b0 . (47)
where i=1
(n + 2i)2 + (n + 2i) − n(n + 1)
Therefore solution for Fn in terms of the variable r /a is given by
" #
d 2 d
L= (1 − ζ ) , !2j
dζ dζ !
∞
r X r
Fn = 1+
subject to the boundary conditions c̃ = 1 at z = ±1. a j=1
a
The only physically acceptable eigenfunctions of the above !
operator are the Legendre polynomials of first kind: Pe2 l4 δ12
2
φ + 4
ψn = Pn (ζ ) with eigenvalues χn = n(n + 1), j
Y
× , (48)
(n = 0, 1, 2, . . .). (37) i=1
(n + 2i)2 + (n + 2i) − n(n + 1)
Thus the following Legendre–Fourier series is assumed for the here b0 is taken as 1 for simplicity. Now from the boundary
solution of Eq. (34) condition given in (41), we have
! !
∞ ∞ +1
2n + 1 Pe l2 δ1 ζ
Z
X X r
ĉ = Hn (ξ )Pn (ζ ) = Hn Pn (cos θ). (38) Hn (1) = exp Pn (ζ )dζ ,
n=0 n=0
a 2 −1 2
488 J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493
( !)
+1
2n + 1 (−1)n dn Pe l2 δ1 ζ internal velocity with frequency and Darcy number. It is observed
Z
2 n
= (ζ − 1) exp dζ , that the internal velocity increases with both frequency and Darcy
2 2n n! −1 dζ n 2
number. Increase in Darcy number offers more volume flow in
to the porous region for a fixed pressure drop. Also, increase in
!n !
+1
2n + 1 Pe l2 δ1 Pe l2 δ1 ζ
Z
= (1 − ζ ) 2 n
exp dζ . (49) oscillation in the flow field induces enhancement in volumetric
2n+1 n! −1 2 2 flow inside the pellet for a fixed Darcy number.
We note that Hn (1) = an Fn (1), and hence from Eq. (49) we get
!n 4.2. Concentration profiles
+1 2
2n + 1 1
Z
Pe l δ1
an = (1 − ζ 2 )n The characteristics of the concentration profile is shown
2n+1 n! Fn (1) −1 2
graphically. Here nutrient concentration profile along the z-axis
! is given for a combination of various parameters involved in
Pe l2 δ1 ζ Eq. (51), like Darcy number (Da), frequency (̟ ), slip coefficient
× exp dζ . (50)
2 (α), Thiele modulus (φ) and Peclet number (Pe). Due to the
reaction inside the porous pellet, the concentration inside reduces
The expression (38) and the transformed equation (31) are used to compared to the bulk nutrient concentration at the surface. Also
obtain the nutrient concentration profile inside the pellet given by the concentration contours are influenced by the flow direction.
Fig. 4(a) shows the concentration profile in case of steady flow
!
Pe l2 δ1 r cos θ
i
c (r , θ) = c0 exp − i.e. ̟ = 0, for a fixed Da, α and φ . It can be seen that for
2a Pe = 0, there is a symmetry about the center of the pellet as
!n ! this is the case of diffusion only and the minimum concentration
∞
X r r occurs at z = 0. But for a non-zero Pe, the concentration
× an Fn Pn (cos θ), (51)
a a minimum is shifted in the direction of the flow due to convection.
n=0
The increase in minimum concentration with increasing Pe is
where Fn and an are given by Eqs. (48) and (50). It can be seen marginal. Effect of Peclet number on nutrient concentration profile
that 0 ≤ ci ≤ 1 in non-dimensional form and it is a convex is shown in Fig. 4(b) for the combination of parameters Da =
function. The above expression for the concentration corresponds 0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1, ̟ = 3. It is seen that increasing Pe
to the Dirichlet boundary condition at the porous pellet surface. increases the overall nutrient concentration throughout the pellet.
Similar computations may help in order to use a flux condition and Since at low Peclet number diffusion dominates convection, the
the corresponding calculation is deferred for a future investigation. pellet cannot experience significant nutrient transport. However,
The above problem has been solved corresponding to first as Peclet number increases convection becomes a dominating
order reaction kinetics. There are other common kinetics such factor and hence nutrient transport increases inside the pellet. In
as, Michaelis–Menten kinetics, Monod kinetics, which occur in conclusion, as Pe increases, the nutrient concentration minimum
immobilized enzymes and growing populations of immobilized moves downstream while the overall nutrient content of the pellet
cells or microorganisms. But these kinetics lead to nonlinear increases.
problem and the present solution methodology is no more A comparison between steady and oscillatory flow is shown
valid to handle such type of kinetics. It may be mentioned in Fig. 5(a). It can be easily seen that oscillatory flow assists
that the kinetics dealt in the present article is a special case convection and hence more nutrient is transported inside the
of the Michaelis–Menten and Monod kinetic models, when the pellet compared to steady flow. Though the general tendency of
concentration tends to zero. Pe is to assist convection, in case of steady flow the effect of Pe
is marginal whereas in case of oscillatory flow it is substantial.
4. Results and discussion Effect of frequency on the nutrient concentration profile is shown
in Fig. 5(b) for the combination of parameters Pe = 100, Da =
The analytical solution derived in the previous sections allow us 0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1. It is observed that as ̟ increases
to determine the velocity and nutrient concentration profiles. The the overall nutrient concentration increases inside the pellet. In
characteristics of the velocity and concentration profiles are shown conclusion, as ̟ increases, the nutrient concentration minimum
graphically. The frequency of oscillation is assumed to be between moves downstream while the overall nutrient content of the pellet
1 kHz and 10 kHz and a2 /ν = 10−3 s. increases.
Fig. 6(a) shows the concentration profile for the combination of
4.1. Velocity profiles parameters Pe = 100, ̟ = 3, α = 0.5, φ = 1 with varying
Da. Increasing Da offers less resistance and fluid flows easily
The tangential velocity component Vθe versus r /a is shown in through the pellet resulting enhancement of the overall nutrient.
Fig. 2. In general, fluid experiences less resistance in the presence The nutrient concentration minimum moves downstream with
of the porous pellet in comparison to impermeable particle, as increasing Darcy number. Fig. 6(b) shows the concentration profile
impermeable particle expects no slip on the surface. However, a for the combination of parameters Pe = 100, Da = 0.005, ̟ =
porous pellet with smaller Darcy number offers larger resistance 3, α = 0.5 with varying φ . When Thiele modulus is small,
compared to that of with larger Darcy number. It can be seen the reaction rate is less compared to the diffusion rate, and the
from Fig. 2(a) that when the frequency of oscillation is low, the pellet concentration becomes nearly uniform. For large values
magnitude of the uniform far field basic velocity slightly increases of the Thiele modulus, the reaction rate is large compared to
and near to the body the velocity reduces due to the resistance the diffusion rate and one can see sharp concentration gradients
offered by the particle. However, for large frequencies, the increase near the surface of catalyst. Stephanopoulos and Tsiveriotis [16]
in the magnitude of the uniform far field basic velocity is more considered the steady Stokes flow outside the porous pellet and
(Fig. 2(b)). When Da = 0, which corresponds to a solid particle, formulated the convection–diffusion–reaction problem for zeroth
the uniform far field velocity slightly increases before it realizes order reaction. They have obtained analytical expression for the
the resistance due to the particle and then decreases to satisfy the nutrient transport inside the pellet and observed starvation zone
no-slip condition. Fig. 3 shows the variation in magnitude of the inside the pellet for a particular choice of parameters involved. In
J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493 489
a b
Fig. 2. Variation in magnitude of the external tangential velocity (Vθe ) with r /a.
a b
Fig. 3. Variation in magnitude of the internal velocity (V i ) with (a) frequency (̟ ). (b) Darcy number (Da).
a b
Fig. 4. Nutrient concentration profile along z-axis, Da = 0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1. (a) steady case. (b) ̟ = 3.
order to avoid starvation a relationship between Peclet number any such starvation zones. In case of zeroth order reaction, for
and the Thiele modulus was established. Prakash et al. [28] have large values of the Thiele modulus, surface reaction is rapid. The
extended the study of Stephanopoulos and Tsiveriotis [16] to the reactant is consumed fast into the interior of the pellet leading
case of oscillatory flow and discussed the effect of frequency of to the exhaustion of the nutrient resulting to a starvation zone.
oscillation on nutrient transport and observed similar starvation Whereas, in case of first order reaction kinetics, nutrient does not
zones for some choice of parameters. It is noted that in the current get exhausted as the reaction proceeds and therefore no starvation
study which corresponds to first order reaction, we do not see zones occur. It may be noted here that the starvation region
490 J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493
a b
Fig. 5. Nutrient concentration profile along the z-axis. (a) comparison between steady and oscillatory cases. (b) Pe = 100, Da = 0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1 with ̟ .
a b
Fig. 6. Nutrient concentration profile along the z-axis. (a) Pe = 100, ̟ = 3, α = 0.5, φ = 1. (b) Pe = 100, Da = 0.005, ̟ = 3, α = 0.5.
a b
Fig. 8. Nutrient concentration profile along the z-axis for polymers, fibers with ̟ = 5, α = 0.5, φ = 1.
a b
Fig. 9. Variation of effectiveness factor (ηc ) with φ . (a) Pe = 200, Da = 0.007, α = 0.5. (b) Pe = 200, ̟ = 5, α = 0.5.
a b
Fig. 10. Variation of effectiveness factor (ηc ) with frequency (̟ ). (a) Da = 0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1. (b) Pe = 100, α = 0.5, φ = 1.
diffusivity and vice versa. Hence, the simulations shown may be briefly by Nir and Pismen [10]. Hence, it is worth investigating
understood keeping this limitation in view. the impact of various parameters on the effectiveness factor.
The ratio of the observed reaction rate to the rate in the
absence of intraparticle mass transfer resistance is defined as the
4.3. Effectiveness factor effectiveness factor. The effectiveness factor in case of first order
reaction for a spherical geometry is defined as [10]
Strieder and Aris [30] have shown via variational inequalities
1
that the effect of first order reaction will be enhanced by 3
Z
∂ c̃
ηc = dζ . (52)
intraparticle convection and the same fact has been explained 2φ 2 −1 ∂r r =1
492 J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493
Acknowledgements
References
After some algebra we obtain
∞ [1] N. Carpenter, E. Roberts, Mass transport and residence time characteristics of
3π Pe l2 δ an oscillatory flow electrochemical reactor, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 77 (1999)
1
(−1)n (2n + 1)In2+1/2
X
ηc = 212–217.
φ 2 Pe l2 δ1 n=0 2
[2] D. Neeper, A model of oscillatory transport in granular soils, with application
2 to barometric pumping and earth tides, J. Cont. Hyd. 48 (2001) 237–252.
Pe l δ1
β In+3/2 β2
Pe l2 δ1 In+3/2 2
[3] H. Nagaoka, Mass transfer mechanism in biofilms under oscillatory flow
× − 2 , (53) conditions, Water Sci. Technol. 36 (1996) 329–336.
2 In+1/2 β
2 I
n+1/2
Pe l δ1 [4] S. Ilias, R. Govind, Potential applications of pulsed flow for minimizing
2 2 concentration polarization in ultrafiltration, Sep. Sci. Tech. 25 (2001)
q 1307–1324.
[5] D. Eckmann, J. Grotberg, Oscillatory flow and mass-transport in a curved tube,
with β = Pe2 l4 δ12 + 4φ 2 . J. Fluid Mech. 188 (1988) 509–527.
Fig. 9 depicts the variation of effectiveness factor with Thiele [6] C. Dragon, J. Grotberg, Oscillatory flow and mass-transport in a flexible tube,
modulus for various values of ̟ and Da. It is clear that in the range J. Fluid Mech. 231 (1991) 135–155.
[7] Y. Jiang, J. Grotberg, Bolus contaminant dispersion in oscillatory tube flow with
of φ < 1, the effect on ηc is marginal whereas the drop is striking
conductive walls, J. Biomech. Eng. Trans. ASME 115 (1993) 424–431.
in the more practical range of 1 < φ < 10. Fig. 10(a) shows [8] R. Aris, The Mathematical Theory of Diffusion and Reaction in Permeable
the effectiveness factor for the combination of parameters Da = Catalysts, Clarendon, Oxford, 1975.
0.005, α = 0.5, φ = 1 with varying ̟ . It is observed that [9] H. Komiyama, H. Inoue, Effects of intraparticle convective flow on catalytic
effectiveness factor increases with increase in Pe for a fixed ̟ . reactions, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 7 (1974) 281–286.
[10] A. Nir, L. Pismen, Simultaneous intraparticle forced convection, diffusion and
This is because as Pe increases the surface reaction rate decreases
reaction in a porous catalyst, Chem. Eng. Sci. 32 (1977) 35–41.
as a result effectiveness factor increases. Fig. 10(b) shows the [11] A.E. Rodrigues, J.C.B. Lopes, M.M. Dias, G. Carta, Diffusion and convection in
effectiveness factor for the combination of parameters Pe = permeable particles: Analogy between slab and sphere geometries, Sep. Tech.
100, α = 0.5, φ = 1 with varying Da. Increasing Da enhances 2 (1992) 208–211.
the effectiveness factor for a fixed Pe and φ . [12] Z.P. Lu, M.M. Dias, J.C.B. Lopes, G. Carta, A.E. Rodrigues, Diffusion, convection,
and reaction in catalyst particles: Analogy between slab and sphere
geometries, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 32 (1993) 1839–1852.
4.4. Variation of minimum concentration [13] A.E. Rodrigues, R. Quinta Ferreira, Convection, diffusion and reaction in a
large–pore catalyst particle, AIChE Symp. Ser. 84 (1988) 80–87.
[14] J.C.B. Lopes, M.M. Dias, V.G. Mata, A.E. Rodrigues, Flow field and non-
For a fixed combination of other parameters, the variation of isothermal effects on diffusion, convection, and reaction in permeable
minimum concentration with Da is shown in Fig. 11. It is seen that catalysts, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 (1995) 148–157.
the concentration minimum increases with increasing Da, due to [15] S.S.S. Cardoso, A.E. Rodrigues, Diffusion and reaction in a porous catalyst slab:
increased volume flow inside the pellet. perturbation solutions, AIChE J. 52 (2006) 3924–3932.
[16] G. Stephanopoulos, K. Tsiveriotis, The effect of intraparticle convection on
nutrient transport in porous biological pellets, Chem. Eng. Sci. 44 (1989)
5. Conclusion 2031–2039.
[17] A.R.A. Khaled, K. Vafai, The role of porous media in modeling flow and heat
transfer in biological tissues, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 46 (2003) 4989–5003.
The nutrient transport inside a spherical porous pellet in an
[18] J.R. Looker, S.L. Carnie, The hydrodynamics of an oscillating porous sphere,
oscillatory flow has been studied. The model assumes a spherical Phys. Fluids 16 (2004) 62–72.
porous pellet placed in an oscillatory Stokes flow. Darcy’s law is [19] G.S. Beavers, D.D. Joseph, Boundary conditions at a naturally permeable wall,
used inside the porous pellet and unsteady Stokes equation is used J. Fluid Mech. 30 (1967) 197–207.
outside the pellet. Velocity and pressure fields are obtained and [20] P.G. Saffman, On the boundary condition at the surface of a porous medium,
Stud. Appl. Math. 50 (1971) 93–101.
the convection–diffusion–reaction problem is formulated for a first
[21] G.P. Raja Sekhar, T. Amaranath, Stokes flow past a porous sphere with an
order reaction kinetics. Effect of various parameters on the velocity impermeable core, Mech. Res. Comm. 23 (1996) 449–460.
as well as concentration profile is shown. It is observed that the [22] B.S. Padmavathi, T. Amaranath, S.D. Nigam, Stokes flow past a porous sphere
internal velocity increases both with frequency and permeability, using Brinkman model, Z. Angew. Math. Phy. 44 (1993) 929–939.
hence for a fixed Darcy number, increase in frequency enhances [23] G.P. Raja Sekhar, B.S. Padmavathi, T. Amaranath, Complete general solution of
the Brinkman equations, Z. Angew. Math. Mech. 77 (1997) 555–556.
the volume flow inside the pellet. The effect of frequency on the
[24] P. Levresse, I. Manas–Zloczower, D.L. Feke, Hydrodynamic analysis of porous
nutrient concentration profile is discussed for various combination spheres with infiltrated peripheral shells in linear flow fields, Chem. Eng. Sci.
of parameters involved and a significant effect of frequency of 56 (2001) 3211–3220.
J. Prakash et al. / European Journal of Mechanics B/Fluids 29 (2010) 483–493 493
[25] Anindita Bhattacharyya, G.P. Raja Sekhar, Viscous flow past a porous sphere- avoid starvation zones for convection–diffusion–reaction problem inside a
effect of stress jump condition, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59 (2004) 4481–4492. porous biological pellet under oscillatory flow, Internat. J. Engrg. Sci. 48 (2010)
[26] M.K. Partha, P.V.S.N. Murthy, G.P. Raja Sekhar, Viscous flow past a porous 693–707.
spherical shell-effect of stress jump boundary condition, J. Eng. Mech. 131 [29] F.J. Valdés–Parada, J. Álvarez–Ramírez, J.A. Ochoa–Tapia, An approximate
(2005) 1291–1301. solution for a transient two–phase stirred tank bioreactor with nonlinear
[27] P. Vainshtein, M. Shapiro, Forces on a porous particle in an oscillating flow, kinetics, Biotechnol. Prog. 21 (2005) 1420–1428.
J. Colloid Interface Sci. 330 (2009) 149–155. [30] W. Strieder, R. Aris, Variational Methods Applied to Problems of Diffusion and
[28] Jai Prakash, G.P. Raja Sekhar, Sirshendu De, Michael Böhm, A criterion to Reaction, Springer–Verlag, Heidelberg, 1973.