R (Imc 21)
R (Imc 21)
R (Imc 21)
IN MATTER OF
FAMILY APPELATE JURISDICTION
RAHUL PETITIONER
V/S
SIMRAN RESPONDENT
WRITTEN ON THE BEHALF OF RESPONDENT
TABLE OF CONTENT
INDEX OF ABBREVIATION………..
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES………………..
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION…………….
STATEMENT OF FACTS………………………..
ISSUES PRESENTED……………………….
SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS………………….
ARGUMENTS ADVANCED…………………….
PRAYER………………………………..
LIST OF ABBREVIATION
ABBREVIATION EXPANSION
Hon’ble Honorable
PWDVA Protection of
Women From
Domestic Violence
Act
U/S Under Section
Add. Additional
Pet. Petition
AIR All India Report
INDEX OF AUTHORITIES
Krishnamurthy V/s
Syananthakamani
(1976)
Vedantham V/s
Nirmala (1990-1)
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1.Petitioner and Respondent both are born in a Hindu family. Petitioner hails from Nagpur and
the only bread earner in his family. Respondent born and brought up in Mumbai.
2.Marriage was solemnized in march 2015 at Mumbai according to Hindu custom and
ceremonies under Hindu Marriage Act.
3. Petitioner and Respondent never consummated the marriage because the Petitioner is very
busy in his business and did not paid heed to the marriage.
4. In-laws demanded Respondent remain back at home. She was insulted and never
appreciated in front of others.
6.rahul was suffering from a financial loss and could not paid attention to his family and
marriage and develop and argumentative nature.
7.In distress state, he got addicted to alcohol and return home late night in heavily drunken
state.
8.On Respondent conformation he mentally and physically abused her , in-laws refuse to
resolve the matter.
9.Respondent could not tolerate the menace, left the matrimonial home, and started residing
with her parents. Petitioner and his parents made attempt to call respondent and ask her to
return back considering societal pressure, she got return back in 15 days.
10. Respondent realized the same situation as earlier and the Petitioner posed no love or
affection towards her.
11.Pressure from her parent and in-laws decided her to adjust and live with a hope that one
day things will be alright. At the same point the Petitioner was highly addicted to alcohol.
12.After 5 years,The Petitioner was having an extra- marital affair with his business partner
“Damini” when Respondent Confronted him, he inflicted mental and physical assault on her.
13. Respondent could not bear mental agony and left matrimonial home. She did not justified
the reason of her leaving and took all her belongings and Stridhan with her.
STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION
The respondent have approached Family Court Nagpur Under Section 12,18,19,20,22,23, of
Protection of Women domestic Violence act.
Also the respondent demands Maintenance from the Petitioner Under Section 25 of the Hindu
marriage act,1955.
Another petition under section 13(1)(ib) of Hindu Marriage act for grant of Divorce under
section 24.
ISSUES RAISED
2.So, as the Petitioner was in the influence of alcohol all the day, every time when the
Respondent confronted him for his bad habits he started rigorously beating and slapping her.
3. Also, The petitioner gave no respect to the respondent and would always use degraded,
abusing and filthy word when the respondent would communicate with the Petitioner. Also when
The responded expected love and affection From the side of petitioner , the petitioner never ever
gave attention to the feeling of Respondent.
4. Also after some years it was commonly noticed by the respondent that the petitioner would
use stay a very long hours in his phone and also when the respondent would ask anything to the
Petitioner ,then the Petitioner would get very short-tempered towards it and start abusing and
doing assaults on her. Then when one day the respondent checked the phone of the Petitioner,
She was really shocked on seeing that The Petitioner had very Long Chats and Call which were
relating to the chats of a girlfriend and boyfriend likewise with a ladies no. so called “Damini”.
5. Also, the Respondent suffered many domestic Violence from the side of Petitioner which were
abusing her, doing physical assault on her and also mental torture on her which proved to have a
very bad impact on her health. So, Now the respondent have no longer a will to live with the
Petitioner as it is has become very threatful for her life. Therefore, the responded would also like
to take Divorse with the Petitioner under section 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu marriage act, 1955 and
also like to take maintenance from the side of Petitioner Under section 12 and furthermore she
would also like apply charges on the Petitioner under section 18,19,20,22,23 of protection of
women from the domestic Violence act 2005.
ARGUMENT ADVANCED
In the Light of Arguments advanced and authorities cited the respondent humbly submits that
the Honorable family court may be pleased to judge and declare that