EJ1335970
EJ1335970
EJ1335970
Melissa Corrente
University of Ottawa
Kristen Ferguson
Nipissing University
Abstract
23
Introduction
It is often reported that approximately one in five people in Canada will personally experience a
mental health illness or concern in any given year (Canadian Mental Health Association, 2021).
Moreover, according to The World Health Organization, mental health disorders will be the
world’s leading cause of disability by 2030 (Bartha, 2018), and these projections predate the
COVID-19 pandemic. Mental health is more than the absence of a mental health condition or
illness: it is a positive sense of wellbeing, or the capacity to enjoy life and deal with the challenges
we face (Canadian Mental Health Association, 2021). Mental health problems and illnesses
represent a range of behaviours, thoughts, and emotions that can affect areas such as school, work,
social, and family interactions.
Like all workers, teachers experience mental health challenges. The expectations and
responsibilities placed upon teachers both at home and in schools has an impact on teacher mental
wellbeing. Teachers are not only dealing with their own mental health issues; one in five children
and youth under the age of 19 in Ontario has a mental health challenge. For teachers, this translates
into 20% of students in an average classroom dealing with some type of mental health issue
(Children’s Mental Health Ontario, 2020). In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic created the need
for school systems and teachers to move their education online. Little research has been published
to investigate the mental health implications for teachers since COVID-19.
Teaching is considered a highly stressful job with numerous stressors, resulting in a high risk of
burnout (Friedman, 2003). Work-related pressures such as work overload, multiple demands,
emotional labour, and a lack of psychological safety are among some of the challenges faced by
teachers. Teacher stress has been defined as “the experience by a teacher of unpleasant, negative
emotions, such as anger, anxiety, tension, frustration or depression, resulting from some aspect of
their work as a teacher” (Kyriacou, 2001, p. 28). Stress is often the first sign that teachers may be
struggling with mental health issues (Schonfield et al., 2017). Some stress in the workplace is
necessary and even desirable, as stress may be motivating and enhance work performance—this is
called eustress (Selye, 1976). But, in undesirable or unreasonable amounts, stress can have the
opposite effect and become distress (Cedoline, 1982). Psychological distress stems from negative
events over which a person has no control and manifests in two forms: depression and anxiety
(Mirowsky & Ross, 2003). Teachers, who are constantly exposed to stressful situations, may
“burnout” if these situations are not handled appropriately. Maslach (1999) defined this as a
syndrome of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment that
can happen among individuals who work with people in some capacity.
Work stress and burnout are significantly associated with negative psychological
outcomes, absenteeism, low job satisfaction, and the intention to quit (Ogus, 2008). Stress in
teaching is prevalent. The Ontario College of Teachers reports that 13% of teachers feel stressed
all the time, compared to 7% of the general population (Jamieson, 2006). The Ontario Secondary
School Teachers’ Federation (Johnston-Gibbens, 2014) reports that 30.3% of their members felt a
significant increase of overall levels of work stress in the past five years. These high levels of
stress are of concern, as research indicates that teacher stress can negatively impact student
learning (Borg & Riding, 1991; Brown et al., 2002; Herman et al., 2018; Manthei & Gilmore,
1996), organizational commitment and job satisfaction (Duxbury & Higgens, 2013), and teacher
attrition (Clark & Antonelli, 2009; Naghieh et al., 2015). The British Columbia Teachers’
24
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Federation conducted a survey of public school teachers to assess working and learning conditions
(Naylor & White, 2010). They reported that one in eight teachers surveyed was on a leave of
absence in 2010 and about half of the teachers on leave indicated that workload issues contributed
to their decision to take a leave (Naylor & White, 2010). In England, 1.3 million days have been
taken off by teachers for stress and mental health reasons in the four years preceding 2018 (Asthana
& Boycott-Owen, 2018). These findings have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. In a
recent National Post article, multiple teachers’ unions said, “Our members are increasingly in need
of leaves of absence due to mounting stress and burnout stemming from the health crisis”
(Lorriggio, 2021).
Teaching during a global pandemic has amplified the mental health issues that existed before
COVID-19. The Canadian Teachers’ Federation (2020) conducted a mental health check-in survey
from 16–25 October 2020. They found that 69% of teachers had concerns about their mental health
and/or wellbeing. Only 44% of teachers had these same concerns or questions regarding their
mental health and/or wellbeing in a previous survey conducted in June 2020 (Canadian Teachers’
Federation, 2020). The stress and burnout teachers felt prior to COVID-19 are currently being
amplified as teachers do their best to maintain the safety of their students and themselves during
the pandemic (Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2020). Another Canadian study, for example,
surveyed 1,278 teachers to examine burnout during the pandemic. In their research of Canadian
teachers during the early months of the pandemic, Sokal et al. (2020) explained that when teachers
are in the initial stages of burnout and exhibiting high exhaustion, mitigating the situation must
involve decreasing demands and providing selected resources.
It is also important to recognize that teaching is gendered as a feminine profession (Drudy,
2008; Griffin, 1997), meaning women are still more predominant in the teaching profession than
men (Schmude & Jackisch, 2019). According to data from Statistics Canada (2014), 59% of
secondary school teachers are women, and this proportion increases to 84% in elementary school.
Little literature discusses how gender structures teachers’ mental health in a context of care at
home. This knowledge gap is surprising, given the broader gender differences in mental health that
exist in society and the disproportionate impact of the pandemic of women’s mental health
(Cabezas-Rodriguez et al., 2021; Thibaut & van Wijngaarden-Cremers, 2020).
Purpose
It has been well established that the teaching profession is an occupation with a high prevalence
of work-related stress (Leung et al., 2009; Naghieh et al., 2015), yet its impact on leaves of absence
and return-to-work has not been widely researched and reported. The purpose of this scoping
review was to investigate and consolidate the existing research on teacher mental health, leaves of
absences, and return-to-work. Specifically, we asked the following research questions about the
literature on elementary and secondary teachers:
• Which teachers are leaving work for mental health reasons, and what are the key factors
causing them to leave work?
• What factors help to foster return-to-work for teachers?
• What relevant details about gender, both in terms of participation and/or findings, are
present?
25
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Theoretical Lens
As a profession, teaching has been gendered feminine (Drudy, 2008; Griffin, 1997), which
necessitates a theoretical approach that considers how gender structures teachers’ mental health
in the context of care. Gender is distinct from sex, which is biologically based. Gender “refers to
the socially constructed roles, behaviours, expressions and identities of girls, women, boys, men,
and gender diverse people” (Canadian Institutes of Health Research, 2015, para. 2). We draw
from feminist care work literature to frame our study (Benoit & Hallgrimsdottir, 2011;
Noddings, 2015). Care work is an appropriate theoretical framework for this study because it
involves privileging processes and experiences of caring in the context of work. Using care work
as a theoretical lens also underlines the role of gender in prescribing and maintaining unhealthy
working conditions for teachers (Isenbarger & Zembylas, 2006). In particular, a care work
theoretical lens exposes how gender interacts with common understandings of care/work that are
attached to both teaching and motherhood and how this interaction can have a negative impact
on teachers (Noddings, 1996).
Care can be described as a “species activity that includes everything we do to maintain,
continue, and repair our ‘world’ so that we can live in it as well as possible” (Tronto & Fisher,
1990, p. 40): in other words, reproductive labour. We couple this understanding of care with a
feminist definition of work as anything that involves “creating and serving for either one’s own
or one’s dependents’ direct consumption, in exchange for pay and/or other support” (Applebaum,
1992; Benoit & Hallgrimsdottir, 2011, p. 3). This complimentary understanding of care and work
exposes the double burden of care work that exists for teachers who are also mothers—there is
an expectation to care for students at work as well as perform a disproportionate amount of care
work in the home.
Methods
The literature search was conducted with the assistance of a research librarian. Databases searched
were MEDLINE(R) ALL via Ovid, APA PsycINFO via Ovid, CINAHL via EBSCO, and
Sociological Abstracts via Proquest. The databases were searched on 12 May 2020. Searches were
limited by language of publication (French or English) and date of publication (2005 to May 2020).
The main search concepts were comprised of terms for teachers/educators, return-to-work, and
leave of absence. See Appendix 1 for the search strategy employed by the research librarian. The
initial library database search produced 1,015 references.
We utilized the software program Covidence to help systematically review the literature.
All references were screened by the first author by reviewing the title and abstract. After the initial
screening of the 1,015 references, a total of 106 studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria
or were identified for further investigation to determine their relevance to the review. See
Appendix 2 for the full inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of the references that were excluded
at this stage focused on student mental health. The first author read the full texts of 106 studies;
after this screening, reading, and review, 62 articles met the inclusion criteria. A second reviewer
screened and read over all 106 studies to confirm that each study met the inclusion criteria. One
duplicate record was found at this stage; therefore, 61 articles were included in this review. The
articles were sorted into the following categories based on identified keywords directly linked to
26
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Figure 1
27
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Findings
This scoping review illuminates the diverse experiences of teachers experiencing mental health
issues, particularly when a gender lens is taken. The literature focusing on
presenteeism/absenteeism continues to be a growing field; however, no particular group of
teachers clearly leads in absentee rates. The amount of stress and pressure teachers are
experiencing remains the most common narrative across the literature. Much of the literature
discussing teachers taking a leave of absence focuses on the negative repercussions on student
achievement. Little research exists that examines which teachers are returning to school after a
leave of absence. The findings are presented by theme: stress and burnout in teaching,
presenteeism/absenteeism, leaves of absence, and return-to-work/interventions.
The most common narrative found in the scoping review literature is the amount of stress
teachers are experiencing and the pressures that are causing them to burn out (Chennoutfi et al.,
2012; Dean, 2011; Green, 2014; Ogus, 2008; Yu et al., 2015). Concerns such as student violence
against teachers (Dzuka & Dalbert, 2007; Longobardi et al., 2019; Mcmahon et al., 2014; Wilson
et al., 2011), supporting the diverse needs of students (Brackenreed, 2011; Hassan et al., 2015;
Kebbi, 2018), and the need to wear ‘multiple hats’ have negatively affected the stress teachers
experience (Provencio, 2018; Olsen & Buchanan, 2017; Russel, 2009).
High levels of teacher burnout are also reported throughout the literature (Garcia-Carmona
et al., 2019; Jeter, 2014; Ogus, 2008; Yang et al., 2011). In a comparative research study, Ogus
(2008) determined that work stress and burnout are associated with negative psychological
outcomes, absenteeism, low job satisfaction, intention to quit, and maladaptive coping. Ogus
(2008) found teachers experienced significantly more negative outcomes, such as higher overall
stress and burnout, emotional exhaustion, depression, job dissatisfaction, and absenteeism,
compared to physicians and managers. This sentiment is in contrast to the results from a French
cross-sectional survey, which established that teachers do not seem to have poorer mental health
compared to middle-class civil servants (Kovess-Masfety et al., 2006). Results from a German
study wherein teachers were compared to the general population found that teachers had a more
healthful lifestyle and a lower frequency of cardiovascular risk factors; however, it was noted that
mental and psychosomatic diseases were more common in teachers than non-teachers (Scheuch et
al., 2015). Looking at these findings through a care work lens, female teachers may be expected
to cope with stress by responding in more emotionally expressive ways than men (Chatmon, 2020).
A cross-national comparison on subjective wellbeing of teachers in Hong Kong and Italy
revealed that country context can predict mental health and self-esteem (Benevene et al., 2018).
Results found that the country plays the strongest predictive role on self-esteem and mental health.
Higher levels of job satisfaction were found among Italian teachers, while teachers from Hong
Kong were more satisfied in pay and promotion. Researchers established that job satisfaction and
self-esteem seem to protect teachers from risk of mental ill-health (Benevene et al., 2018). The
disparity in results demonstrates the effect that geography has on the educational landscape.
Teaching workloads, schedules, funding, support systems, and system-wide policies vary from
country to country.
Harassment at work creates hostile and unhealthy environments, not only for its direct
targets, but also for teachers who observe the process (Astrauskaite et al., 2010). Astrauskaite et
al. (2010) found that teachers who observed harassment reported higher levels of emotional
28
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
exhaustion. Exposure to mental abuse in the classroom also increases the risk of mental disorders,
according to a Finnish research study (Ervasti et al., 2011). Researchers uncovered that special
education teachers are at risk for violence at work, male teachers even more so than women
(Ervasti et al., 2011). Few studies discussed how teachers effectively manage stress and burnout;
Jeter (2014) reported teachers were using emotion-focused coping strategies to manage their work-
related stress and burnout. Gender structures still view female teachers as nurturing and providing
emotional support for others, which places a heavy emotional burden on this population
(Isenbarger & Zembylas, 2006; Ott et al., 2017).
In Hong Kong, teachers exhibited a moderately high level of recognition of mental
disorders, but only 8.5% of those with these disorders sought help from mental health professionals
because of concern over stigma (Lee et al., 2007). Teachers who experience a high degree of
occupational strain (Yang et al., 2011) report chronic disease, taking sick leave, stressful life
events, divorce, separation, role overload, and high levels of responsibility as factors that
negatively affect their careers. Returning to the notion of care work, it is predominantly female
teachers who experience disproportionate losses in household income and the burden of securing
childcare in situations involving divorce or separation.
Presenteeism/Absenteeism
There is a growing body of research focusing on teacher absenteeism and sick leave.
Presenteeism refers to diminished productivity and quality of work when a teacher is present at
school while ill (Howard et al., 2012). Absenteeism is the habit of not reporting to work or school
or can be defined as chronic missed days of work or school (Scott, 1998). A study in Germany
found that more than half of the teachers reported sickness presenteeism (Dudenhoffer et al., 2017).
A study by Green (2014) established that 80% of teachers in New York wanted to take a sick day
due to stress that they attributed to their work, with 40% having done so. Further, a study in Brazil
discovered the prevalence of pressure to work when ill was higher among participants with
children (Assuncao & Abreu, 2019). The literature highlights teachers who come to work when
they are sick due to the pressure that they feel to get everything done (Panari & Simbula, 2016).
There is no consensus on which teachers display the highest rates of absenteeism (Albrecht,
2013; Dana, 2015; Dillehay, 2013; Holloway, 2011; James, 2018; Pitts, 2010; Russell, 2018).
Dillehay (2013) concluded that more experienced teachers have higher absence rates, while Usman
et al. (2007) found that contract and less experienced teachers have higher absence rates. Other
researchers suggest working in a socioeconomically disadvantaged neighbourhood is associated
with increased risk of sick leave (Ervasti et al., 2011; Dana, 2015; Virtanen et al., 2010). Three
risk factors for work absenteeism were identified among Brazilian schoolteachers: lack of
opportunities for new learning experiences, perception of heavy demands from tasks, and the
experience of verbal or physical violence from students (Maia et al., 2019). McGalla (2009) found,
however, that absenteeism and teacher wellness did not affect a teacher’s performance in the
classroom. From a care work perspective, McGalla’s findings are not surprising, due to the fact
that teachers are socialized to take care of others before themselves (Isenbarger & Zembylas, 2006;
Noddings, 1996).
The type of leave policy that a school offers affects how many days teachers are absent.
According to a study in New Mexico, teachers who worked in a school district that offered only
unpaid sick leave had 4.7 fewer days of leave than teachers who work in a district that offered paid
leave (James, 2018). Absence behaviours are contextual in nature; Pitts (2010) uncovered that
29
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
requiring teachers to report absences directly to the principal resulted in a reduction in short-term
absenteeism.
Leaves of absence
In the teaching profession, the term leave of absence refers to any long-term time spent
away from a teaching position with school board approval or as deemed necessary by a doctor
(The Alberta Teachers’ Association, 2020). Much of the literature discussing teachers taking a
long-term leave of absence focuses on how it negatively affects student achievement (Brown &
Arnell, 2012; Bruno, 2002; Lewis, 2020; Obeng-Denteh et al., 2011; Speas, 2010). One study
compared a group of Spanish secondary school teachers who took a psychiatric sick leave with a
second group of teachers who had no history of psychiatric sick leaves (Moriana & Herruzo, 2006).
They discovered the most significant variables related to taking a psychiatric sick leave included
competitiveness, hostility, and emotional exhaustion as a factor of burnout and job dissatisfaction
(Moriana & Herruzo, 2006). A cross-sectional study in Germany found that teachers on long-term
sick leave are impaired to a greater extent compared to their working colleagues not only mentally
but also physically, based on their cardiovascular fitness (Brutting et al., 2018).
Return-to-work/interventions
Little research has been conducted to determine which teachers do or do not return to work
after a leave of absence and what accommodations, if any, are being provided upon returning to
the school environment. For our purposes, the term intervention refers to “an activity or set of
activities aimed at modifying a process, course of action or sequence of events, in order to change
one or several of their characteristics such as performance or expected outcome” (World Health
Organization, 2011, p. 10). One research study evaluated the process of teachers returning to work
and discovered that most teachers returned to work with unwanted and unfavorable health
conditions (Silva & Fischer, 2012). Johnson & Birkeland (2003) believe in order to address return-
to-work, it is necessary to examine the network of causes related to absenteeism. If teachers are
returning to similar work environments to those that caused them to leave in the first place, the
likelihood of a successful return-to-work is low (Johnson & Birkeland, 2003).
The scoping review revealed some promising interventions being used to help improve
teacher mental health and wellbeing. The Wellbeing in Secondary Education Project is a research
study taking place at the University of Bristol and Cardiff University. The pilot study introduced
and evaluated an intervention aimed at providing support for secondary school teachers’ wellbeing
and mental health. The intervention included 8% of staff receiving Mental Health First Aid as well
as a confidential peer support service, training in Mental Health First Aid for adults working in
schools, and a one-hour mental health awareness raising session delivered to all teaching staff
(Kidger et al., 2016). Researchers reported teachers who received the training had greater mental
health knowledge and had fewer stigmatizing attitudes regarding depression and anxiety. Staff
who received training had high confidence in helping colleagues and students (Kidger et al., 2016).
Kidger et al. (2016) acknowledge that the pilot study was small and the follow-up period was only
six months, so little difference in staff wellbeing was found. According to Kidger and colleagues
(2016), implementing the project on a larger scale and for a longer time period may produce more
favorable results.
Since 2014, the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation has offered an online mental health
and wellness tool called Starling Minds. Starling Minds is a mental health promotion intervention,
30
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
not a specific return-to-work intervention. It is designed specifically for teachers to help them
assess, monitor, and improve their mental fitness (British Columbia Teachers’ Federation, n.d.).
Starling Minds is also being used by the Northwest Territory Teaching Association, the Nunavut
Teachers’ Association, and the Quebec English Speaking Teachers’ Association. According to the
Starling Minds website, 80% of their users have reported an improvement in overall mental health,
and 77% of users report lower stress, anxiety, and depression (Starling Minds, 2020).
One study currently being conducted among public primary school staff in Sweden aims
to compare the effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy versus a single
implementation strategy for dealing with mental health issues within schools (Kwak et al., 2019).
The single strategy involves a one-day educational meeting, whereas the multifaceted strategy
consists of the educational meeting, establishment of an implementation team, and a series of five
workshops aimed at the concept of SMART-goals, behavior change and barriers, facilitators that
can influence behavior change, and strategies needed to target the identified barriers and
facilitators. Researchers believe schools that receive support in implementing the multifaceted
strategy will be more responsive to working with the management of social and organizational
risks at their school and that this will reduce risk factors for mental ill health. According to Kwak
et al. (2019), mental ill health is the leading cause of sick leave among the working population in
Sweden. In their future research, Kwak and colleagues (2019) hope to gain more knowledge on
strategies that prevent the occurrence of common mental disorders.
Very few studies offered strategies to help reduce teacher absenteeism and presenteeism.
Dudenhoffer et al. (2017) highlighted the importance of developing a climate of support,
encouraging supervisors to act as role models by staying home when ill, and reducing teacher
workloads after sickness absence so teachers can catch up on work that was missed.
Discussion
The purpose of the scoping review was to highlight the existing research as well as identify gaps
in the literature surrounding teacher mental health, leaves of absence, and return-to-work, paying
explicit attention to the impact of gender. The scoping review reveals that, in line with the
theoretical lens of psychological distress (Cedoline, 1982; Mirowsky & Ross, 2003), teachers are
experiencing negative stress stemming from work. Stress and burnout impact teacher physical
health and personal relationships (Garcia-Carmona et al., 2019; Jeter, 2014; Yang et al., 2011).
According to Ogus (2008), teachers experience higher levels of stress, depression, emotional
exhaustion, and absenteeism when compared to physicians and managers.
The literature also reveals that presenteeism and absenteeism exist across the education
sector regardless of factors such as teaching experience, workplace conditions, or student
population (Albrecht, 2013; Dana, 2015). Research should focus on making a connection between
presenteeism/absenteeism and the mental health of teachers. If patterns of absence start to develop
among individual teachers within a school, the focus could switch to prevention on a school level.
Some school boards monitor leaves of absence at each school; however, this monitoring can be
perceived by teachers as a punitive measure warning them not to take more time off (Uehara,
1999). In order to help administrators play a positive role in teacher mental health, the absenteeism
tracking policies could be used to reach out and offer teachers support. Administrative support is
an important factor in teacher wellbeing, and administrators can play a significant role in building
resilient teams that perform well (Sokal et al., 2020). Prevention strategies might support teachers
who are struggling with personal, familial, or work issues before they develop into something more
serious that would require a leave of absence. Although school boards offer Employee Assistance
31
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Programs (EAP), they are often utilized after teachers experience burnout or take a leave of
absence. Teachers should receive clear orientation at the beginning of the school year on how to
seek help when they need psychological or administrative support (Machado & Limongi, 2019).
The literature on leaves of absence and return-to-work was scant. The lack of published
literature, in terms of which teachers are taking leaves of absence and why, is not surprising,
considering the overall scarcity of research focusing on return-to-work interventions. Much of the
literature focuses on how teachers’ taking a leave of absence negatively affects student
achievement (Brown & Arnell, 2012; Bruno, 2002; Lewis, 2020; Obeng-Denteh et al., 2011;
Speas, 2010).
There are promising interventions being used to improve teacher mental health and
wellbeing, such as the Wellbeing in Secondary Education Project that provides Mental Health First
Aid to adults working in schools (Kidger et al., 2016). Researchers reported teachers who received
the training had fewer stigmatizing attitudes regarding depression and anxiety. It is promising to
read about interventions supporting teacher mental health; however, more research is needed to
evaluate the effectiveness of each intervention and if it can be operated on a larger scale to reach
more educators. Knowing how to handle a teacher’s return from leave can help manage the feelings
of all parties involved and would benefit teachers, students, and school systems.
We cannot afford to lose large numbers of teachers to burnout. Orienting strategies on the
need for teachers to “fix themselves” is less effective (and indeed unethical) when the source of
the problems is in the structure of school systems. The findings from our knowledge synthesis
strongly suggest that developing a climate of support starts at the top with administrators
(Dudenhoffer et al., 2016). Having a supportive principal contributes to teachers’ job satisfaction
and their intentions to remain in schools (Jackson, 2018).
Our review also suggests that providing return-to-work strategies that recognize the
influence of gender on this process may benefit female teachers who are struggling with care work
and could use additional support strategies. Care work is continuous in nature, causing many
female teachers to dedicate their time away from the classroom to aging parents, children, or the
continued performance of teaching duties from home (e.g., report cards, communicating with the
teacher covering their leave, etc.). Female educators with children often take sick time to care for
their children, leaving them with little to no time for their own sick days. Taking maternity leave
can also have negative implications for female teachers, as they may be overlooked for promotions
or leadership positions within their school or board. From a care work perspective, many female
teachers who end up taking a leave of absence are not taking care of themselves while off work.
Many female teachers are not offered a gradual return-to-work or cannot financially afford to do
so.
We were surprised the literature did not focus on the gendered dimension of teaching in
particular as a form of care work (Benoit & Hallgrimsdottir, 2011). The complimentary
understanding of care and work can expose the double burden of care work that exists for women
who are also mothers; there is an expectation to work as well as perform a disproportionate amount
of care in the home (Bratberg et al., 2002; Chen et al., 2020). It would be interesting to explore
how COVID-19 has affected parents as they negotiate teaching in a virtual or face-to-face
classroom, accessing childcare, and the mental health implications that surface as work/home life
become blurred.
32
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
This study is limited by the fact that scoping reviews do not assess the quality of the data collected
in the found studies. Rather, scoping reviews seek to map out the landscape of the extant research
on a topic (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005). Forward and backward snowballing techniques were not
utilized to ensure that all possible eligible articles were captured. Another limitation of the study
is the lack of published research in the area of teacher leaves of absence and return-to-work. While
the extant literature on teacher stress is plentiful, research on teachers who are temporarily leaving
the workplace due to stress and returning to work has not been deeply explored by researchers.
Therefore, the pool of articles drawn from in this scoping review tend to focus mostly on teacher
mental health and stress and their potential links to teachers taking a leave of absence. In turn,
leaves of absence and return-to-work among teachers are crucial areas that warrant future research.
Given media reports that sick days are continually increasing among teachers (Loriggio, 2021;
Macintosh, 2021; Miller, 2018) and that teachers are taking long-term stress leaves for mental
health and stress (Asthana & Boycott-Owen, 2018), more research is needed. We urge educational
researchers to look closely at worker mental health, the reasons why teachers are taking leaves,
and how teachers can return as healthy and satisfied employees back at school.
More longitudinal research needs to focus on the factors leading up to teacher burnout and
leaves of absence so that preventative strategies can be implemented, as well as the offering of
different interventions. If teachers are provided with appropriate coping and resiliency resources,
the incidence of burnout and work-related stress could be reduced. Schools need to be a well place
for everyone, and mental health initiatives should focus on teachers, students, and the school
environment (Ott et al., 2017). Ott et al. (2017) suggest, “The way forward is not to funnel more
knowledge about mental health and wellness into educators, but to develop communities of
practice with them” (p. 23). Additional research needs to explore the factor(s) that cause teachers
to request leaves of absence and how schools can better support teachers when they are ready to
return to their positions. Further research focusing on gender and other social identities is needed
to understand and address the gendered expectations that still exist in today’s 21st century
classrooms.
Finally, the COVID-19 pandemic has added an additional layer of stress to the teaching
profession. We need additional research on its impact so we can better support teachers and ensure
their mental health is well taken care of.
Conclusion
Awareness surrounding teacher mental health is growing; however, more could be done to
mitigate the mental health challenges and support those who are struggling. The dominate narrative
is that we need to monitor and improve the mental health and wellbeing of teachers because it may
affect the mental health and wellbeing of students. Instead, the narrative needs to change to reflect
the fact that teacher mental health is human mental health. In addition to individual stress
interventions at the worker level, systemic changes are needed to mitigate teacher stress. Teachers
require emotional support, mental health resources, and healthy relationships with administrators
and school boards. School climate affects everyone in the school, so more training needs to be
provided to the leadership team in each school. The scoping review reveals that mental health,
leaves of absences, and return-to-work are understudied among teachers and therefore deserve
further research. In addition, the role of gender and care and their relationship to teacher mental
33
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
health remain understudied in the literature (Ferguson et al., in press). COVID-19 continues to
pose a range of challenges to educators and has added more stress to an already high-stress
profession. Now, more than ever, we need to support teachers as they adapt to ensure learning can
continue both during and post-pandemic. Although individual mental health strategies can be
effective in supporting some educators, a multi-layered approach is necessary in order to target
systemic changes in the education sector. Focusing on organizational- and systemic-level
strategies to improve teacher mental health has the ability to create long-lasting changes that
teachers deserve.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by funding from a Canadian Institute of Health Research and Social
Sciences and Humanities Research Council Partnership Development grant (2015–2017) #890-
2016-3029.
Author Bios
Melissa Corrente is a Research Associate at the University of Ottawa. She teaches courses on
health and physical education, and her research interests include teacher mental health and food
literacy for children. Melissa has published articles in The Toronto Star, SAGE Research
Methods, and the Physical and Health Education Journal.
Ivy Lynn Bourgeault is a Professor in the School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies at
the University of Ottawa and the uOttawa Research Chair in Gender, Diversity, and the
Professions.
References
34
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Assuncao, A. A., & Abreu, M. N. S. (2019). Pressure to work, health status, and work conditions
of schoolteachers in Basic Education in Brazil. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00169517
Asthana, A., & Boycott-Owen, M. (2108, January 11). ‘Epidemic of stress’ blamed for 3,750
teachers on long-term sick leave. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/jan/11/epidemic-of-stress-blamed-for-3750-
teachers-on-longterm-sick-leave
Astrauskaite, M., Perminas, A., & Kern, R. M. (2010). Sickness, colleagues’ harassment in
teachers’ work and emotional exhaustion. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 46(9), 628–634.
Bartha, B. (2018, April 8). Community collaboration in children and youth mental health: Cross-
sector approaches and challenges [Conference workshop]. Presentation at 6th Mental Health
Law for Children & Youth Workshop, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Benevene, P., Wong, Y. H. P., Fiorilli, C., & De Stasio, S. (2018). A cross-national comparison
on subjective well-being of kindergarten teachers: Hong Kong and Italy. Frontiers in
Psychology, 9, 2626. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02626/full
Benoit, M. G., & Hallgrimsdottir, H. (Eds.). (2011). Valuing care work: Comparative perspectives.
University of Toronto Press.
Borg, M. G., & Riding, R. J. (1991). Occupational stress and satisfaction in teaching. British
Educational Research Journal, 17(3), 263–281.
Bourgeault, I., Park, J., Kohen, D., Atanackovic, J., & James, Y. (2021). A gendered analysis of
work, stress and mental health, among professional and non-professional workers. Professions
and Professionalism, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.7577/pp.4029
Brackenreed, D. (2011). Inclusive education: Identifying teachers’ strategies for coping with
perceived stressors in inclusive classrooms. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration
and Policy, 122, 1–37.
Bratbert, E., Dahl, S., & Risa, A. (2002). The double burden: Do combinations of career and family
obligations increase sickness absence among women? European Sociological Review, 18(2),
233–249.
Braun, V., & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
British Columbia Teachers’ Federation. (n.d.) Starling Minds. Retrieved November 13, 2020,
from https://bctf.ca/uploadedFiles/Public/SalaryBenefits/Rehab/StarlingMindsFAQs.pdf
Brown, M., Ralph, S., & Brember, I. (2002). Change-linked work-related stress in British teachers.
Research in Education, 67, 1–12.
Brown, S., L., & Arnell, A. T. (2012). Measuring the effect teacher absenteeism has on student
achievement at an “urban but not too urban”: Title 1 elementary school. International Journal
of Humanities and Social Science, 2(17), 172–183.
Bruno, J. E. (2002). The geographical distribution of teacher absenteeism in large urban school
district settings: Implications for school reform efforts aimed at promoting equity and
excellence in education. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(32), 1–3.
Brutting, J., Druschke, D., Spitzer, S., & Seibt, R. (2018). Health status of long-term sick leave
and working female teachers in Germany: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of
Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health, 31(2), 227–242.
Cabezas-Rodríguez, A., Utzet, M., & Bacigalupe, A. (2021). Which are the intermediate
determinants of gender inequalities in mental health?: A scoping review. International
Journal of Social Psychiatry, 67(8), 1005–1025.
35
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2015). Definitions of sex and gender. Retrieved from
https://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/47830.html
Canadian Mental Health Association (2021, July). Fast facts about mental health and mental
illness. https://cmha.ca/fast-facts-about-mental-illness
Canadian Teachers’ Federation (2020, November). Teacher Mental Health Check-in Survey -
Pandemic Research Report. https://vox.ctf-fce.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Doc-13-1-
Pandemic-Research-Report-Teacher-Mental-Health-Check-in-Survey.pdf
Cedoline, A. J. (1982). Job burnout in public education: Symptoms, causes, and survival skills.
Teachers College Press.
Chatmon, B. (2020). Males and mental health stigma. American Journal of Men’s Health, 14(4).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988320949322
Chen, L., Fan, H., & Chu, L. (2020). Double-burden effect: Does the combination of informal care
and work cause adverse health outcomes among females in China? Journal of Aging and
Health, 32(9), 1222–1232.
Chennoufi, L., Ellouze, F., Cherif, W., Mersni, M., & M’rad, M. F. (2012). Stress and burnout
among Tunisian teachers. L’Encephale, 38(6), 480–487.
Children’s Mental Health Ontario (2020). Teacher Resources. https://cmho.org/teacher-resources/
Clark, R., & Antonelli, F. (2009). Why teachers leave: Results of an Ontario survey 2006–08.
Ontario Teachers' Federation. http://www.otffeo.on.ca/wp-
content/uploads/sites/3/2013/10/why_teachers_leave1.pdf
Dana, L. B. (2015). Relationships among job satisfaction, professional efficacy, student and school
performance, and teacher absenteeism. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of
Southern Mississippi.
Dean, E. J. (2011). Exploring the individual contributory personality factors of stress: A survey of
Washington State elementary teachers. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Washington State
University.
Dillehay, G. W. III. (2013). A mixed method analysis of the interaction between teacher variables,
teacher absences, school district policies, and student achievement. [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. Tennessee State University.
Drudy, S. (2008) Gender balance/gender bias: the teaching profession and the impact of
feminisation. Gender and Education, 20(4), 309–323.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250802190156
Dudenhoffer, S., Claus, M., Schone, K., Letzel, S., & Rose, D. M. (2017). Sickness presenteeism
of German teachers: Prevalence and influencing factors. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and
Practice, 23(2), 141–152.
Duxbury, L., & Higgens, C. (2013). The 2011/2012 national study on balancing work, life and
caregiving in Canada: The situation for Alberta teachers.
https://www.teachers.ab.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/ATA/Publications/Research/COOR-
94%20National%20Study%20on%20Balancing%20Work%20-Duxbury.pdf
Dzuka, J., & Dalbert, C. (2007). Student violence against teachers: Teachers’ well-being and the
belief in a just world. European Psychologist, 12(4), 253–260.
Ebert, D., Lehr, D., Bob, L., Riper, H., Cuijpers, P., Andersson, G., Thiart, H., Heber, E., &
Berking, M. (2014). Efficacy of an internet-based problem-solving training for teachers:
Results of a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment &
Health, 40(6), 582–596.
36
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Ervasti, J., Kivimaki, M., Pentti, J., Suominen, S., Vahtera, J., & Virtanen, M. (2011). Sickness
absence among Finnish special and general education teachers. Occupational Medicine, 61(7),
465–471.
Ferguson, K., James, Y., & Bourgeault, I. (in press). Teacher mental health and leaves of absences:
A pilot study examining gender and care. Canadian Journal of Education.
Friedman, I. A. (2003). Self-efficacy and burnout in teaching: The importance of interpersonal
relations efficacy. Social Psychology of Education, 6(3), 191–215.
Garcia-Carmona, M., Marin, M. D., & Aguayo, R. (2019). Burnout syndrome in secondary school
teachers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Psychology of Education: An
International Journal, 22(1), 189–208.
Green, G. R. (2014). Study to investigate self-reported teacher absenteeism and desire to leave
teaching as they relate to teacher-reported teaching satisfaction, job-related stress, symptoms
of depression, irrational beliefs, and self- efficacy. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. City
University of New York.
Griffin, G. (1997). Teaching as a gendered experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(1), 7–
18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487197048001003
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among
teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 495–513.
Hassan, U., Hussain, M., Parveen, I., & De Souza, J. (2015). Exploring teachers’ experiences and
practices in inclusive classrooms of model schools. Journal of Theory and Practice in
Education/Egitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(3), 894–915.
Herman, K. C., Hickmon-Rosa, J. E., & Reinke, W. M. (2018). Empirically derived profiles of
teacher stress, burnout, self-efficacy, and coping and associated student outcomes. Journal of
Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(2), 90–100.
Holloway, P. (2011). Teacher absenteeism. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of
Houston.
Howard, K., Howard, J., & Smyth, A. (2012). The problem of absenteeism and presenteeism in
the workplace. In R. Gatchel & I. Schultz (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health and
wellness (pp. 151–179). Springer.
Isenbarger, L., & Zembylas, M. (2006). The emotional labour of caring in teaching. Teaching and
Teacher Education, 22(1), 120–134.
Jackson, M. (2018). Examining the relationship between school climate and teacher absenteeism,
teacher job satisfaction, and teachers’ intentions to remain. [Unpublished doctoral
dissertation]. Trevecca Nazarene University.
James, E. W. (2018). Teacher absenteeism under different district policies in New Mexico.
[Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Grand Canyon University.
Jamieson, B. (2006). State of the teaching profession 2006: Back in the day…
https://professionallyspeaking.oct.ca/september_2006/survey.asp
Johnston-Gibbens, A. (2014). Workload and volunteerism of educators. Ontario Secondary School
Teachers’ Federation. https://www.osstf.on.ca/en-CA/publications/research-
studies/workload-volunteerism-report.aspx
Jeter, L. (2014). Coping strategies title i teachers use to manage burnout and stress: A multisite
case study. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Northcentral University.
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003). Pursuing a “sense of success”: New teachers explain
their career decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 581–617.
Kebbi, M. (2018). Stress and coping strategies used by special education and general classroom
teachers. International Journal of Special Education, 33(1), 34–61.
37
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Kidger, J., Brockman, R., Tilling, K., Campbell, R., Ford, T., Araya, R., King, M., & Gunnell, D.
(2016). Teachers’ wellbeing and depressive symptoms, and associated risk factors: A large
cross sectional study in English secondary schools. Journal of Affective Disorders, 192, 76–
82.
Kovess-Masfety, V., Sevilla-Dedieu, C., Rios-Seidel, C., Nerriere, E., & Chan Chee, C. (2006).
Do teachers have more health problems? Results from a French cross-sectional survey. BMC
Public Health, 6, 101.
Kwak, L., Lornudd, C., Bjorklund, C., Bergstrom, G., Nybergh, L., Schafer Elinder, L., Stigmar,
K., Wahlin, C., & Jensen, I. (2019). Implementation of the Swedish guideline for prevention
of mental ill-health at the workplace: Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial,
using multifaceted implementation strategies in schools. BMC Public Health, 19, 1668.
Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1),
27–35.
Lee, S., Tsang, A., & Kwok, K. (2007). Stress and mental disorders in a representative sample of
teachers during education reform in Hong Kong. Journal of Psychology in Chinese Societies,
8(2), 159–178.
Leung, S. S., Wah Mak, Y., Yu Chui, Y., Chiang, V. C., & Lee, A. C. (2009). Occupational stress,
mental health status and stress management behaviors among secondary school teachers in
Hong Kong. Health Education Journal, 68(4), 328–343.
Lewis, W. S. (2020). Teacher absenteeism and the perceived reasons for its effect on student
achievement in three Barbadian secondary schools. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
Durham University. https://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13585/
Longobardi, C., Badenes-Ribera, L., Fabris, M. A., Martinez, A., & McMahon, S. D. (2019).
Prevalence of student violence against teachers: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Violence,
9(6), 596–610.
Lorriggio, P. (2021, March 24). School boards short of supply teachers amid rise in teacher
absenteeism during pandemic. National Post. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/school-
boards-struggle-to-find-supply-teachers-amid-rise-in-absences-due-to-covid-19
Machado L., & Limongi, J. (2020). Prevalence and factors associated to common mental disorders
among municipal teachers in Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Revista brasileira de medicina
do trabalho, 17(3), 325–334.
Macintosh, M. (2021, March 1). Teacher sick days spike in Seven Oaks. Winnipeg Free Press.
https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/special/coronavirus/teacher-sick-days-spike-in-seven-
oaks-573897322.html
Maia, E. G., Claro, R. M., & Assuncao, A. A. (2019). Multiple exposures to the risk of work
absenteeism among Brazilian schoolteachers. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 35.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00166517
Manthei, R., & Gilmore, A. (1996). Teacher stress in intermediate schools. Educational Research,
28(1), 3–19.
Maslach, C. (1999). Progress in Understanding Teacher Burnout. In R. Vandenburghe, A. M.
Huberman (Eds.), Understanding and preventing teacher burnout: A sourcebook of
international research and practice (pp. 211–222). Cambridge University Press.
McGalla, M. (2009). The impact of teacher wellness, age, years of teaching, gender, grade level
taught, and absenteeism on teacher performance at the elementary level. [Unpublished
doctoral dissertation]. Marywood University.
38
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Mcmahon, S., Martinez, A., Espelage, D., Rose, C., Reddy, L., Lane, K., Anderman, E., Reynolds,
C. Jones, A., & Brown, V. (2014). Violence directed against teachers: Results from a national
survey. Psychology in the Schools, 51(7), 753–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21777
Miller, J. (2018, Mar. 26). Sick leave skyrockets among teachers, classroom educators in Ottawa
public school board. The Ottawa Citizen. https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/sick-
leave-skyrockets-among-teachers-classroom-aides-in-ottawa-public-school-board
Mirowsky, J., & Ross, C. E. (2003). Social causes of psychological distress (2nd ed.). Aldine De
Gruyther.
Moriana, J. A., & Herruzo, J. (2006). Variables related to psychiatric sick leave taken by Spanish
secondary school teachers. Work & Stress, 20(3), 259–271.
Naghieh, A., Montgomery, O., Bonell, C. P., Thompson, M., & Aber, J. L. (2015). Organizational
interventions for improving wellbeing and reducing work-related stress in teachers. Cochrane
Database of Systematic Reviews, 4. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010306.pub2
Naylor, C., & White, M. (2010). The worklife of BC teachers in 2009: A BCTF study of working
and learning conditions. Retrieved May 18, 2019,
https://www.bctf.ca/uploadedfiles/public/issues/WorklifeWorkload/2009/fullreport.pdf
Noddings, N. (1996). The cared-for. In S. Gordon, P. Benner, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Caregiving:
Readings in knowledge, practice, ethics, and politics (pp. 21–39). University of Pennsylvania
Press.
Noddings, N. (2015). The challenge to care in schools (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.
Obeng-Denteh, W., Yeboah, E., Sam, C., & Monkah, J. (2011). The impact of student and teacher
absenteeism on student performance at the junior high school: The case of the Kumasi-Metro
School District. Continental Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 7–17.
Ogus, E. D. (2008). Burnout among professionals: Work stress, coping and gender. [Unpublished
doctoral dissertation]. York University.
Olsen, B., & Buchanan, R. (2017). Everyone wants you to do everything: Investigating the
professional identity development of teacher educators. Teacher Education Quarterly, 44(1),
9–34.
Ott, M., Hibbert, K., Rodger, S., & Leschied, A. (2017). School-based mental health policy with
student and teacher resiliency. Canadian Journal of Education, 40(2), 1–30.
Panari, C., & Simbula, S. (2016). Presenteeism “on the desk”: The relationships with work
responsibilities, work-to-family conflict and emotional exhaustion among Italian
schoolteachers. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 9(1), 84–95.
Parker, P. D., Martin, A. J., Colmar, S., & Liem, G. A. (2012). Teachers’ workplace well-being:
Exploring a process model of goal orientation, coping behavior, engagement, and burnout.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 503–513.
Pitts, K. L. (2010). Teacher absenteeism: An examination of patterns and predictors. [Unpublished
doctoral dissertation]. Virginia Commonwealth University.
Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational
Researcher, 50(5), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211004138
Provencio, F. (2018). The multiple hats that teachers wear. Page Publishing.
Roffey, S. (2012). Pupil wellbeing – Teacher wellbeing: Two sides of the same coin? Educational
and Child Psychology, 29(4), 8.
Russell, M. D. (2018). Relationships among teacher absenteeism, evaluation scores, and
satisfaction with teaching at the elementary school level. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation].
University of Memphis.
Russel, C. (2009). Wearing too many hats. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(6), 78–80.
39
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Scheuch, K., Haufe, E., & Seibt, R. (2015). Teachers’ health. Deutsches Arzteblatt International,
112(20), 347–356.
Schmude, J., & Jackisch, S. (2019). Feminization of teaching: Female teachers at primary and
lower secondary schools in Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany: From its beginnings to the
present. In H. Jahnke, C. Kramer, & P. Meusburger (Eds.), Geographies of schooling (pp.
339–349). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18799-6_17
Schonfeld, I. S., Bianchi, R., Luehring-Jones, P. (2017). Consequences of job stress for the mental
health of teachers. In T. McIntyre, S. McIntyre, & D. Francis (Eds.), Educator stress. Aligning
perspectives on health, safety and well-being. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-
53053-6_3
Scott, N. M. (1998). Teacher absenteeism: A growing dilemma in education. Contemporary
Education, 69(2), 95–99
Selye, H. (1976). The stress of life (Rev. ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Silva, A. A., & Fischer, F. M. (2012). Teachers’ sick leave due to mental and behavioral disorders
and return to work. Work, 41, 5815–5818.
Sokal, L., Trudel, L., & Babb, J. (2020). Supporting teachers in times of change: The job demands-
resources model and teacher burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal
of Contemporary Education, 3(2), 67–74.
Speas, C. M. (2010). Teacher absences: Types, frequency, and impact on student achievement.
Wake County Public School System, 2007–2008. (E & E Report No. 09.37).
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED557405.pdf
Starling Minds. (2020, November 13). Starling minds. https://www.starlingminds.com/
Statistics Canada. (2014). Back to school … by the numbers.
https://www.statcan.gc.ca/en/dai/smr08/2014/smr08_190_2014
Stoeber, J., & Rennert, D. (2008). Perfectionism in school teachers: Relations with stress
appraisals, coping styles, and burnout. Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 21(1), 37–53.
Thibaut, F., & van Wijngaarden-Cremers, P. (2020). Women’s mental health in the time of Covid-
19 pandemic. Frontiers in Global Women's Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2020.588372
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in
systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(45).
https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45
Tronto, J. C., & Fisher, B. (1990). Toward a feminist theory of caring. In E. Abel, & M. Nelson
(Eds.), Circles of care (pp. 36–54). SUNY Press.
Uehara, D. (1999). Where are the teachers? A policy report on teacher attendance in the pacific
region. Pacific Resources for Education and Learning.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED440925.pdf
Usman, S., Akhmadi, & Suryadarma, D. (2007). Patterns of teacher absence in public primary
schools in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 27(2), 207–219.
Virtanen, M., Kivimaki, M., Pentti, J., Oksanen, T., Ahola, K., Linna, A., Kouvonen, A., Salo, P.,
& Vahtera, J. (2010). School neighborhood disadvantage as a predictor of long-term sick leave
among teachers: Prospective cohort study. American Journal of Epidemiology, 171(7), 785–
792.
World Health Organization. (2011). World Health Organization health systems strengthening
glossary. https://www.who.int/healthsystems/Glossary_January2011.pdf
Wilson, M., Douglas, K., & Lyon, D. (2011). Violence against teachers: Prevalence and
consequences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(12), 2353–2371.
40
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Yang, X., Wang, L., Ge, C., Hu, B., & Chi, T. (2011). Factors associated with occupational strain
among Chinese teachers: A cross-sectional study. Public Health, 125(2), 106–113.
Yu, X., Wang, P., Zhai, X., Dai, H., & Yang, Q. (2015). The effect of work stress on job burnout
among teachers: The mediating role of self-efficacy. Social Indicators Research, 122(3), 701–
708.
41
Mental Health Experiences of Teachers: A Scoping Review 16(1)
Appendix 1
# Searches
1 exp coronavirus infections/
2 exp coronavirus/
3 (coronavirus* or covid).ti,ab.
4 or/1-3
5 limit 3 to yr="2019 -Current"
6 ((mers adj5 (coronavirus* or virus* or disaster* or crisis or emergency or outbreak*)) or
mers-cov or middle east respiratory or middle east virus).ti,ab.
7 ((sars adj5 (coronavirus* or virus*or disaster* or crisis or emergency or outbreak*)) or
sars-cov or severe acute respiratory syndrome*).ti,ab.
8 (((wuhan or shanghai or seafood or beijing) and (coronavirus* or covid)) or 2019-nCoV
or 2019nCoV or nCoV2019 or nCov-2019 or COVID-19 or COVID19 or SARS-CoV-2
or HCoV-19).ti,ab.
9 or/5-8
10 family leave/ or sick leave/
11 absenteeism/ or presenteeism/
12 (absentee* or presentee*).ti,ab.
13 leave-of-absence*.ti,ab.
14 ((sick or family or stress) adj2 leave*).ti,ab.
15 10 or 11 or 12 or 13 or 14
16 return-to-work/
17 (return-to-work or back-to-work).ti,ab.
18 ((return* or back) adj2 (work or job* or position*)).ti,ab.
19 accomodation*.ti,ab.
20 16 or 17 or 18 or 19
21 teaching/
22 School Teachers/
23 (teacher* or educator*).ti,ab.
24 ((teach* or education*) adj2 (assistant* or aid?)).ti,ab.
25 or/21-24
26 9 and 25
27 limit 26 to (yr="2005 -Current" and (english or french))
29 15 and 25
30 limit 29 to (yr="2005 -Current" and (english or french))
31 20 and 25
32 limit 31 to (yr="2005 -Current" and (english or french))
33 30 or 32
42
Journal of Teaching and Learning 16(1) M. Corrente, K. Ferguson, & I. L. Bourgeault
Appendix 2
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
DATE - Published between 2005 and 2020 for all - Published before 2005
Canadian and international literature
DOCUMENT - Academic literature (empirical or review - Does not meet document type/study design
TYPE/STUDY papers including systematic methodologies) criteria
DESIGN
POPULATION - Primary and secondary teachers (both male - The other types of workers who are not in
and female) experiencing personal mental the specified sectors and specified
health issues occupations/professions within these sectors
(e.g., childcare workers will be excluded
from the search for the education sector)
CONTENT - MH literature: Addresses mental health - Does not meet content criteria
(MH) issues, leaves of absence (LOA) and
return-to-work (RTW) experiences of teachers
including (but not limited to)
• interventions,
• the impact that gender has on these
dimensions, and
• the impact of mental health issues and
leaves of absence on teachers, their work,
students, colleagues, supervisors, and
organizations
43