Fusion How Integrating Brand and Culture Powers The Worlds Greatest Companies by Yohn, Denise Lee
Fusion How Integrating Brand and Culture Powers The Worlds Greatest Companies by Yohn, Denise Lee
Fusion How Integrating Brand and Culture Powers The Worlds Greatest Companies by Yohn, Denise Lee
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
END NOTES
INDEX
Praise for FUSION
“Denise Lee Yohn hit a home run with her first book, What
Great Brands Do. Now she’s written FUSION and it is just as
provocative. Denise proves beyond a shadow of a doubt
that great companies are powered by brand-culture fusion. I
highly recommend this book!”
—Ken Blanchard, Coauthor, The New One Minute Manager,®
Coeditor, Servant Leadership in Action
“Bruising.”
“Relentless.”
“Painful.”
“Frequent combat.”
“Burn and churn.”
THE FOUNDATIONS OF
BRAND-CULTURE FUSION
However well you set and define your unique core values,
you shouldn’t assume that your employees will understand
what they mean or that everyone will interpret the same
value into the same behavior. It’s critical that you establish
the desired behaviors or behavioral norms associated with
your values so employees know what your values look like
in action.
At Argentinian bank Banco Supervielle, Patricio
Supervielle, chairman, CEO, and president, knew it was not
enough to state his company’s core values as “agile,”
“simple,” and “friendly”—especially if he wanted to turn
such common notions in the banking industry into a
differentiating competitive advantage. So he and his
colleagues engaged in a year-and-a-half road show to meet
with all their managers and executives and flesh out what
the core values meant. They defined the behaviors they
expected employees to demonstrate for each value. For
“simple,” they specified “make decisions as close as
possible to the customer” and for “friendly,” they spelled
out “respect the agreements reached.” They also defined
those behaviors they would not accept. For “agile,” they
spelled out that “setting unchallenging goals” and “ignoring
mistakes and not learning from them” is unacceptable.48
Supervielle acknowledges that “it is very hard to be
consistent, to really walk the talk in every circumstance,”
but by so explicitly defining and describing the company’s
core values, he has made it a little easier.49
Live Out Your Values
In the previous chapter, I explained that every company should have, at the
heart of its culture, a distinct and overarching purpose and a set of core
values that guide how it operates inside and how it is perceived outside. I also
showed you how to develop your overarching purpose. If you’re as thoughtful
as most of the leaders I encounter, I’m confident you’ll be able to set your
purpose without too much difficulty.
I’m guessing, though, that you might find identifying a suitable, single set
of core values more elusive. Your company certainly has values it follows
already—every organization operates with values either explicitly or implicitly.
These values might be proudly listed on your company’s website or they
might lurk undefined, influencing under the radar your employees’ behaviors
and how customers experience your brand.
But are these values—implicit or explicit—serving your company well? Are
they helping you create an organizational culture that is strategically aligned
and integrated with your brand identity? If they’re not, what values should
you be encouraging in your organization to achieve brand-culture fusion?
To arrive at the core values that successfully link your culture and brand, I
recommend starting with identifying the brand type that your brand falls into.
If you know the general type of your brand, you’ll then be able to isolate the
kinds of organizational values needed to support it.
Brand types are categories of brands that share the same strategic
approach or take similar stances to shape their positioning. They differ from
brand archetypes, which are concepts that classify brands according to
storytelling character types like the Hero, the Joker, and the Innocent. While
brand archetypes can be helpful particularly in creating a narrative and tone
of voice to use in advertising campaigns and other communications, the brand
types I’m referring to identify the various ways that brands compete and are
positioned relative to each other. For example, while the Apple and Nike
brands target different customers, offer different benefits, and express
different personalities, both fall into the “innovative brand” type because they
are characterized by their relentless pursuit and introduction of new products.
Likewise, Ritz-Carlton and USAA are both “service brands” because they
consistently deliver superior service, but their identities and competitive
brand strategies couldn’t be more different.
Having worked on a broad range of brands for more than twenty-five years
—large and small, local and international, B2C and B2B, start-ups and well-
established enterprises—I’ve concluded that there is a finite number of brand
types, or ways that brands compete and position themselves. Although no two
brands share the exact same brand identity, there are only nine general brand
types:
If you are having a difficult time identifying the primary brand type
that your brand falls under, thinking about your brand on the
following two dimensions might help you narrow your choices.
Brand types vary in the degree to which they are oriented to change:
Some brand types embrace it. Disruptive, experience, and innovative
brands tend to emphasize novelty and are oriented to what’s next.
Other brand types eschew change and are built through consistency.
Style, service, and value brands tend to establish themselves by
being reliable and unchanging. Some brands types like conscious,
luxury, and performance fall somewhere in between.
The brand types also vary by the type of value they offer to
customers. The value of conscious brands tends to transcend a
specific product or service while performance brands usually create
value that is very tangible and material, and most luxury brands
create value that is somewhere in between.
Look at Figure 2.1 and identify where your brand might fit best.
As you consider which brand type your brand best fits under, try to be as
objective as you can. When it comes to building your brand identity,
perception is as important, if not more than, reality. For example, your
organization may develop what you think are innovative products, but if your
customers don’t perceive you or your products as innovative, then your
existing brand probably doesn’t fall in the innovative brand category.
Whenever possible, involve other leaders in the process of identifying your
brand type, and if you have conducted customer research recently, consult
their findings to get the full picture on how your brand is currently perceived.
After going through this exercise, you might find that, while your brand
currently fits under one brand type, you aspire for your brand to be another
type. If that’s the case, your aspirations for brand transformation should be
realistic. It’s unlikely that a value brand that offers low prices for basic quality
will become a luxury brand that delivers higher quality at higher prices, for
example. But if you choose to make a sensible shift from one brand type to
another, success is entirely possible if you make changes to your values and
culture. The next step in this assessment process helps you identify the kinds
of values that most support your current or desired brand type.
Once you’ve identified the values you need to support your desired culture,
you then need to ascertain whether the values that currently exist in your
organization—explicitly or implicitly—align with those that correspond with
your brand type.
To do so, start by assessing your culture as it actually is and the core values
that are currently in play in your organization every day—not necessarily the
values that are stated in your company’s mission statement. When I work with
my clients on their culture, we start by performing a thorough culture audit to
fully understand the existing state of their organizational culture. We do an
anthropological study, walking around their offices and taking note of what we
see and hear. We observe how people interact with each other and their
environment. We collect materials from all areas of the business and analyze
them, applying semiotics—the study of signs and symbols—to uncover hidden
meanings. And then we discuss our findings with employees to get their take
on the culture.
A culture audit is best conducted by a cross-functional team working
together with outsiders who can offer fresh perspectives. Doing so ensures
the audit is objective and thorough. If that approach is out of reach for you, or
if you want to make progress while you shore up the resources for that kind of
effort, you can still do your own informal audit by taking stock of the
following:
• Your dress code (is the dress code more professional or casual?)
• The use of technology and social media (are they more restrictive or
open?)
• Taking vacation, sick, and personal leave (are they more flexible or
strict?)
• Safety (are they more proactive or free-handed?)
Informed by insights from your audit, you should be able to identify from
the following list the top values that exist at your organization. The list is, I
admit, a generic collection of broad values. As explained in the previous
chapter, every company has—or should have—values that are distinct to it or
at least expressed in a unique way. But offering a more comprehensive or
nuanced list of values would be impossible, given that the possibilities for
unique values are endless. My hope is that you’ll use the list as a springboard,
and that you’ll see your unique values represented here by some of these
general ones. Also, as is the case with brand types, you might find many of
these values in your organization, but you should focus on the degree to
which your organization embraces a value to determine the three most salient
and influential ones.
For some of you, the culture at your organization is either nondescript or so
negative that it might be difficult to see any values from the list at work in
your organization today. That’s okay. If you find yourself in this situation, skip
this exercise. You’ve already laid the most important groundwork by clearly
identifying the type of brand you’re building and learning the core values
you’ll need to cultivate to deliver on it.
Distinction—people at your company like to set its brand apart from the
competition clearly and deliberately.
Once you know the types of core values you’re aiming for, it’s time to
examine how well your culture and brand are aligned and integrated today.
You need to know how much work you have to do and diagnose where the
biggest disconnects are so you know which areas of culture-building you
should focus on.
To understand the current state of brand-culture fusion at your organization,
it’s important to “begin with the end in mind,” as business guru Dr. Stephen R.
Covey advised.2 Understanding what it looks like when an organization
successfully achieves brand-culture fusion will help you see if and how fusion
is lacking in your organization.
When culture and brand are completely in sync, their alignment is
manifested visibly in four primary areas:
• Purpose and values integration
• Employee experience–customer experience integration
• Internal brand alignment
• Employee brand engagement
As you read about each area, consider whether the indicators listed under
each are present in your organization. Whenever possible, invite other leaders
and employees—particularly from various parts of and at different levels in
your organization—to participate in this exercise and contribute their
perspectives.
If you believe your company needs help achieving purpose and values
integration, you might revisit Chapter 1 to reflect on how to develop and
activate a strong overarching purpose and set of core values. Pay close
attention to Chapter 3, which explains the fundamental role of leaders in
integrating what you do and say internally with what you do and say
externally, and to Chapter 4, which explains how to design and run your
organization in line with your purpose and values. Chapter 8 shows how to
translate your culture—including your values and purpose—into brand
differentiators.
The next area is the extent to which your employee experience and your
customer experience are aligned and integrated. When your culture and
brand are interdependent and mutually reinforcing, there is a strong
connection between how employees experience every aspect of work life
during their tenure in your organization—from being hired to going through
training, from working in a particular space to having tools for and information
about their jobs and the company—and how customers experience your
brand. You engage your employees in the way you expect them to engage
your customers. Indicators of this integration include:
• Your managers treat employees in ways that are consistent with how
they expect them to treat customers.
• You design the employee experience at your company with the same
principles used for your desired customer experience.
• You design and manage your organization to facilitate the collaboration
and shared accountability you need to excel in crafting and delivering
customer experience.
• Your company’s physical workplace environment—a key influence on
employee experience—embodies your brand attributes.
• Your company engages employees through rites, rituals, and symbols
that reflect and bring to life your overarching purpose and core values.
If you find that your current culture falls short of engaging your employees
in the way you expect them to engage customers, then turn to Chapter 5.
There, I’ll show you how leading companies are able to deliver superior
customer experiences because they weave them together with employee
experiences. I’ll also teach you how to achieve strong employee experience–
customer experience integration at your company. And in Chapter 6, I will
explain how to use small experiences in your organization such as rituals and
artifacts to reinforce your desired culture.
Internal Brand Alignment
Internal brand alignment is the extent to which your people are aligned with
each other on brand matters. For your culture to be fully aligned with your
brand, everyone in your organization must share one common understanding
of your brand identity. There are two ways in which this alignment is
manifested in your culture:
Employee brand engagement is the extent to which your people are aligned
and engaged with your brand. This area of brand-culture fusion deserves a
lengthier explanation because people often conflate employee brand
engagement with employee engagement in general (employees’ commitment
to the company and their jobs). But you can’t afford to miss the particular
importance of employee brand engagement when your goal is brand-culture
fusion.
The lack of brand and culture alignment and integration is a key driver of
most organization’s engagement shortcomings. As with culture overall,
employee engagement can’t be pursued in a generic, unfocused way. If your
engagement efforts are intended simply to make employees feel valued and
satisfied, employees might be more inclined to perform their jobs better, but
they’re not necessarily going to help your organization go after its purpose,
live out your core values, or create customer experiences that express either.
Only when you engage your employees with your brand will they think and
act in the specific ways that produce the specific results you’re looking for.
General employee engagement is manifested in employees’ relationships with
their managers and co-workers, their view of their job responsibilities, and
their participation in work activities. Employee brand engagement,
meanwhile, shows up in these three brand-specific ways:
For this area of brand-culture alignment, more than any other, it’s critical
that you include in your assessment your employees’ perspectives so that you
gain an accurate understanding of the current state of your employee brand
engagement. (If you conduct an employee engagement survey, consider
incorporating these measures of brand-specific engagement in it. If you don’t,
Chapter 5 will introduce you to a complete toolkit of survey methods that you
can use to glean employee insights on these and other important topics.)
Should your findings reveal that your employee brand engagement is not as
strong as you’d like, you’ll find relevant insights and action steps throughout
Part 2 of this book. Chapter 7 will be particularly helpful, as I show you how to
produce experiences, communications strategies, and brand toolkits that
develop employee brand engagement and cultivate your desired culture.
If, as you read through the areas of integration, you realize your
culture and brand aren’t as well-integrated and aligned as you had
hoped, you are not alone. Prior to the publishing of FUSION, 250
business leaders pre-tested the online assessment tool, which asks
participants to assess their organizations on each of the four areas of
brand-culture integration. Their responses indicate that few
companies have strong brand-culture fusion across the board. While
a few bright spots exist—B2C organizations tend to enjoy stronger
employee brand engagement than do B2B companies, for example—
most indicators in each area received a favorable rating from around
half of the respondents or fewer. Take the online assessment to
receive a personalized report that will show you specifically how your
results compare to others’.
Now that you’ve assessed your organization on the four areas of brand-culture
alignment and integration, the remainder of this book provides the roadmap,
tools, and approaches for the rest of your journey to brand-culture fusion. Use
your findings to guide you as you read through Part 2 of this book, referring to
the chapters that correspond to the integration areas where you see the
biggest disconnects in your organization.
If you want to get the most value out of the findings from this chapter, then
take the online Brand-Culture Fusion Assessment
(http://deniseleeyohn.com/fusion-assessment/). Once you complete it,
you will receive a personalized report that shows your results and compares
them to the average of everyone who has taken the assessment as well as to
companies with similar characteristics. The report also totals your responses
into a Brand-Culture Fusion Score to represent the overall strength of brand-
culture fusion at your organization. After you’ve implemented some of the
strategies outlined in this book, take the assessment once more to see how
much progress you’ve made.
In this chapter, I’ve shown you how to start cultivating your desired culture by
identifying the core values that are most likely to support your brand
aspiration. But before you begin the task of transforming your current culture
to achieve your desired one, let me remind you one more time: there is no
single right or wrong culture. It might be tempting to grab on to the top values
recommended for the type of brand that best fits your company and to stop
there. But it is up to you to identify and flesh out all the specific core values
that create your company’s unique and powerful culture.
Amazon, for instance, might fall under the innovative brand type whose top
values encourage inventiveness, experimentation, and continuous
improvement—values that are shared by most brands that are innovative. But
Amazon has adapted these general values into distinctive, core ones that
capture the unique way it expects its people to embrace innovation, including
“invent and simplify” and “learn and be curious.” The other values that round
out its complete set of core values also define the distinct way Amazon
expects its people to achieve its innovations. For example, to ensure the
company delivers the highest level of customer experience, every employee
at Amazon is expected to embrace the value of “taking ownership of results.”
According to former Amazon executive John Rossman, this means everyone is
expected “to function as both owners and leaders. [CEO Jeff Bezos] wants you
to drive the business as if it were your own car, not some weekend rental.”3
This core value not only fuels Amazon’s unique innovative brand, it sets its
culture apart from others.
Like Amazon’s culture, your culture must be as distinct as your brand. It
doesn’t matter if your company culture is friendly or competitive, nurturing or
analytical. There is no single right type of culture, just as there isn’t one best
type of brand. Salesforce is known for being inspiring; Southwest Airlines, fun;
Starbucks, sincere. All three of these companies are leaders in their fields and
they got there in part by employing a unique overarching purpose and
distinctive core values that are woven together with a differentiated brand.
Following their lead, your goal should be to identify the specific cultural
elements that enable you to achieve your desired brand identity and then
deliberately cultivate them.
This chapter has laid the groundwork for you to do just that. The next
chapter is about the remaining foundational element of brand-culture fusion:
leadership.
While it’s essential that top leaders talk and walk when it
comes to communicating and living out the core values of
the company, you won’t succeed unless every person in a
leadership role, no matter their level, is on board.
Organization-wide alignment is critical to integrating your
culture and brand. Executives at the top of an organization
must hold accountable their direct reports for cultivating the
desired culture, those managers in turn must do the same
for theirs, and so on. No managerial position is too small or
too remote to ignore the impact it has on the attitude and
behaviors of employees around it.
The adage “people leave managers, not companies”
speaks to the central relationship between direct manager
and employee—particularly for frontline employees who
rarely interact with their organization’s top executives.
Leaders in the middle layers of an organization’s hierarchy,
like department managers, store managers, and program
leaders, wield the most influence on an employee’s daily
experience and therefore are a critical group in any culture
transformation effort.
But middle managers in many organizations are not
engaged to the degree that higher-level leaders are. Aon
Hewitt found that in companies rated as “best employers,”
engagement steadily declined, as you’d expect, along with
the level of responsibility of the person surveyed—that is,
top leaders were the most engaged, team members were
the least, and in between there was a linear correlation
going down through the organization. But at all other
companies, there was sharp drop-off in engagement at the
middle management and team leader level.33 Why the drop-
off?
Most often middle managers are burdened with day-to-
day operations that make it challenging for them to focus on
tasks that may seem longer-term or less defined.
Sometimes top leaders view middle managers as employees
to influence rather than as the powerful influencers that
they are, so they don’t engage them properly. When it
comes to cultivating culture, these are missed opportunities
since mid- and lower-level managers are uniquely positioned
to show employees what the organization really values,
which attitudes and behaviors are on-brand, and why they
and their actions matter.
“Managers who buy into the vision of the company can
make daily decisions that guide the firm in the right
direction,” observe business school professors George
Serafeim and Claudine Gartenberg in an article for Harvard
Business Review. They conclude, “[Purpose] only matters if
it is implemented in conjunction with clear, concise direction
from top management and in such a way that the middle
layer within the firm is fully bought in.”34 If you don’t
engage, empower, and equip this management layer to
cultivate the desired culture as much as you do with their
higher-level counterparts, your efforts to align and integrate
brand and culture are likely to be stalled by what one of my
clients called the “frozen middle.”
This client’s company had hired me to help it achieve
more traction on its diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts and
more tangible improvements in the results these efforts
produced. At the very top levels of the organization, support
for the D&I efforts was clearly evident: The CEO set it as a
top priority and, together with the executive team, actively
championed it in his communications. Grassroots support
was also strong, with employees across the company
participating in affinity groups, forums, and trainings
dedicated to advancing D&I in the company.
Despite all that forward movement, middle management
had been left behind. It was particularly hard for middle
managers at the company, who were predominantly white
males, to internalize the value of D&I. Even those who
understood it intellectually didn’t understand how to
operationalize those values on a daily basis. This “frozen
middle” was holding the company back from tapping into
the innovation and fresh thinking that greater D&I would
deliver—and that, in turn, was limiting the company’s ability
to address the changing landscape in which its brand
operated.
To thaw this frozen middle, we had to think about, and
then convey, the value of D&I from a middle manager’s
perspective. First, we broke down for them the business
case for D&I and other data that tied D&I to the results the
managers were accountable for. To win their hearts and
motivate them emotionally, we assembled inspiring,
relevant success stories from their peers. And to instruct
them on how to embed D&I into their daily operating
activities and reap its benefits, we offered them tools such
as diversity action plans. By increasing adoption of D&I in
this middle tier of management, we were able to shift
attitudes and generate increased momentum for D&I among
all levels at the company. Lower-level employees were
informed and affirmed by the role modeling they
experienced from their managers, and higher-level
executives became even more engaged when they started
to see improved results in their units. Every leader at every
level is a link in the leadership chain that connects culture
to results.
FIVE STRATEGIES TO
ACHIEVE BRAND-CULTURE
FUSION
Organizational Structure
Organizational Standards
Organizational Roles
WHAT IS EX?
THE RULES OF EX
EX A series of Someone
Management HR leaders responsible for
working on the complete
recruiting, employee
rewards, experience,
engagement, focused on
and other HR employee
programs journeys,
experiences,
engagement,
and culture
Figure 5.1
You can apply the same methods and tools that produce
successful CX to the design of your EX. There are four main
steps to follow:
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
Conclusion
A
Aarstol, Stephan, 115
accessibility, 42, 171
achievement, 42, 171
action inconsistency, 22
Adobe, 75–76
Airbnb, 183
“#belonganywhere” brand campaign, 95–96
design of offices, 97–98
employee’s experience at, 96–100, 108, 112
“Ground Control” team of, 96, 98
purpose and core values, 97
talent department, 96
Amazon, 53, 132
market value, 8
Web Services, 26
workplace culture, xi–xiii
American Express, 33
American Management Association and Institute for
Corporate Productivity, 64
Andersson, Jörgen, 19
Apple, 11
artifacts, xxii, 41, 131–134
Aspen Institute’s Business and Society Program, 14, 17, 77
Asrin, Alejandro, 174
assessment of brand-culture fusion
brand type, 30–37
culture audit 39–41
current state of brand-culture fusion, 45–50
uniqueness, 52–53
values, 37–45
Audacity Group, 12
Autodesk, 6
B
Banco Supervielle, 20
Barbour, Hilton, 12, 84
B2B (business-to-business) companies, xxiv
Becker, Jan, 6
BELAY, 27, 129
Bellagio, 144
Benioff, Marc, 123
Bezos, Jeff, xii–xiii, xx, 29, 53, 183
BMW, 33
Booz Allen Hamilton, 14, 17, 77
brand
archetypes, 31
classifying, 31
day-to-day engagement with, 49–50
design, 140–141
differentiating, 176–180
engagement session, 65–66
engagement with company’s brand strategy, 50
identifying, 30–37
personal and emotional engagement with, 49
touchpoints, 88–92
types, 31–37
brand-building, xviii–xxi
“brand-as-business” management approach to, xix
brand-culture fusion, xv–xviii, 180–181, 186
assessment of current state of, 45–50
and authenticity of brands, xv
need for, xxiii–xxvi
strategies to achieve, xxii
Brand-Culture Fusion Assessment, 16, 30, 32, 52
brand identity, xii, 152, 164–165, 170
developing, 173
Brand Touchpoint Wheel, 78, 89–91
Branson, Richard, xiii, 6, 29
Braun, Eduardo, 61
Brown, Andrew, 25
Brown, Michael, 132
Bucher, Amy, 131
Buffer, xvii
Burke, Katie, 113, 116
Burkus, David, 132
C
caring, 42, 171
Chernatony, Leslie de, 12, 105
Chevron, 129
Chouinard, Yvon, 163
City Year, xxv, 132–133
Cleveland Clinic, 81
Clio, 113–114
Cloudflare, 129
College Hunks Hauling Junk, 130
Collins, Jim, xiv, 9–11, 13
compensation experience, 115
competition, 42, 171
Conley, Chip, 133
conscious brands, 32, 34
consistency, 42, 171
The Container Store, 61
continuous improvement, 42, 171
Cooper, Brant, 131
core values, 13–24
congruence, achieving and sustaining, 21–24
customer perception of, 17–18
drafting, 20
in hiring decisions, 69
identifying, 16–21, 42–44
importance of setting, 14
information from, 19
as operating instructions, 14
tangible benefits of, 14–15
uniqueness of, 16–17
Corkindale, Gill, 79
countercultures, 25
Covey, Stephen R., 45
creativity, 42, 171
Crossroads Church, 15
culture, xiii
as an antidote to threats, xiv
audit, 39, 41, 44
cultivating healthy, xxiii
healthy, significance of, xiv
culture-aligned operations, 86
culture-building, xviii–xxi
culture change, 77–78
customer experience (CX), 96, 100–101, 103, 107, 118–120
customers, xii
D
Deal, Terrence, 127
Denison, 37
design, 42, 171
desired culture, xxi–xxii, 16, 25, 27, 30, 38–39, 44, 48, 51–
52, 60, 62–64, 66–68, 70, 76, 78, 80–83, 85–86, 92–93,
101, 103, 107–108, 110–112, 116, 120, 123–124, 127–
128, 130–131, 134, 136–137, 141, 144–150, 157, 159,
161, 170, 181, 185
discernment, 42, 171
disruptive brands, 24, 31
distinct culture, 182
distinction, 42, 171
Dreamforce, 123
drivers of business, xiii–xv
Drucker, Peter, 27
E
Ecomagination, 166
Eisingerich, Andreas, 147
Ellinghorst, Arndt, 59
Ellison, Marvin, 86
empathy, 43, 171
employee brand engagement, 48–52, 146–148
communications campaigns, 154–158
experiences, 148–154
investments in, 160–161
toolkits for, 158–160
Employee Experience Architecture, 107
employee experience–customer experience integration, 47–
48, 52
employee experience (EX), 95
aligning and integrating brand and culture, 120
designing, 103–116
employee interactions, 106–109
employee segmentation, 103–106
integrating with customer experience (CX), 118–120
involving employees in designing, 116–118
prioritizing, 101–103
programs, 101
rules of, 99
three-category design model, 109–110
understanding, 98–99
vs employee engagement, 100
employee interactions, 106–109
employee policies and procedures, 40, 124, 134–140
employee segmentation, 103–106
employer branding, 147
employment branding, 147
engagement experience, 114
enhancing subcultures, 25
enjoyment, 43, 171
entertainment, 43, 171
Erickson, Tamara, 110, 112
EX, see employee experience (EX)
excellence, 43, 171
experience brands, 32, 35
experimentation, 43, 171
F
Facebook, 7–8, 13
fairness, 43, 171
FedEx, 25–26, 33
Ferry, Korn, 77
Fields, Mark, 65
Five Whys exercise, 9
Flynn, Nancy, 137
Ford, Henry, 8
Ford Motor Company
core values, 64–65
leadership actions at, 58–60
turnaround of, 55–58
Forman, Jennifer, 149–150
Franklin, Benjamin, 148
Frei, Frances X., 81
Friedman, Nick, 130
Frito-Lay, xiv
frozen middle, 67
fusion, xiii
G
Gardner, Jeremiah, 131
Gartenberg, Claudine, 67
Gazelles, 18
GE, 69, 166–168, 170
Gentle Giants, 130
Gill-Simmen, Lucy, 147
Gittell, Jody Hoffer, 79
Global Brand Leaders, 84
Google, 18–19, 81–82, 137
Gratton, Lynda, 110, 112
Great Recession of 2008, 55
Griffin, Michael, 140
H
Hagerty, 11
haka, 127
Hastings, Reed, 23
Hatfield, Tinker, 4
Hewitt, Aon, 66
high commitment, 43, 172
H&M, 19
Hoffman, 64–65
Howard, Joy, 164
HubSpot, 113, 116–117
Hughey, Cheryl, 185
Human Synergistics, 37
humility, 43, 172
I
IBM, 16
ideological inconsistency, 22
Illumina, 18
Immelt, Jeff, 166
inconsistencies, 22
Ind, Nicholas, 19
innovative brands, 32, 34
internal brand alignment, 48, 52
inventiveness, 43, 172
J
Jackson, Eric, 25
Jannard, Jim, 178–180
JCPenney, 65, 86
Jobs, Steve, 9
Johnson & Johnson, 8
Joie de Vivre, 133, 138
Journal of Brand Management, 147
K
Katzenbach, Jon, 93
Kelleher, Herb, xiv, 183
Kennedy, Allan, 127
Kerr, Michael, 128
Kleinberg, Adam, 139
Kmart, 80
Knight, Phil, 3, 5
L
Laird-Magee, Tyler, 84
Lambert, Eddie, 80
leadership
for achieving brand-culture fusion, 70–71
actions, 64–66
communication skills, 60–64
in decision-making, 68–70
diversity and inclusion (D&I) efforts, 67–68
for fostering culture, 58–60
hiring and firing decisions, 70
and level of engagement, 66–68
Lederman, Gregg, xvi, 148
Lencioni, Patrick, 21
Leverich, Nicole, 26, 82
Levy, Mark, 96, 117, 183
Lindeman, Jeff, 82–83
LinkedIn, 26, 82
Lorsch, Jay W., 93
lower-level management, 66–67
luxury brands, 32, 35
M
Makower, Joel, 166
Martin, Jason, 125
Meister, Jeanne, 100
MGM Grand, 144
MGM Resorts, 143–146, 148, 183
Michelman, Paul, xix
middle management, 66–67
Miles, Bryan, 27, 129
mission statement, 6–7
Mitchell International, 149
The Mitchell Way Day, 149–150
Morgan, Jacob, 101
Morris, Donna, 76, 82, 114
Morris, Steve, 13
Motley Fool, 139
Mulally, Alan, 56–58, 65
multi-dimensional brand engagement experiences, 151–154
N
Natura, 78, 86–87
NCR, 106
Netflix, 22–23
Nike, 3–4, 179
brand-culture fusion, 5
inspiration and innovation, 5, 8
“Just Do It” tagline, 4
mission and maxims, 4–5
nonprofit organizations, xxv–xxvi
O
O2, 154–157
Oakley, xiv, 178–180
OCAI, 37
office hours experience, 115
Ohana culture, 123, 125–126, 131
on-boarding experience, 113
operationalize culture, xxii, 67, 77–78
#OptOutside campaign, 177–178, 180
organizational culture, 27
artifacts, 131–134
identifying, 37–45
policies and procedures, aligning, 134–140
rites and rituals, 125–130
Organizational Culture Profile, 37
organizational design, 78–85
brand touchpoints, analysis of, 92
bridging culture-change efforts, 93
design principles, 79–80
goal of, 80–81
integrating and aligning culture and brand, 85–87
organizational roles, 82–85
organizational standards, 81–82
organizational structure, 81
organizational subcultures, 25
organizational values, common, 42–44, 171–172
organization’s hierarchy, 66–68
originality, 43, 172
orthogonal subcultures, 25
overarching purpose, 5–13, 95
crafting a meaningful statement, 11–13
pinpointing, 9–10
P
Palmisano, Sam, 16
Parker, Mark, 4
Patagonia, 163
brand identity, 164
environmental efforts and philosophy, 165
People First Leadership: How the Best Leaders Use Culture
and Emotion to Drive Unprecedented Results (Eduardo
Braun), xiii
performance brands, 32, 35
performance review experience, 114
Photoshop, 75
Plant With Purpose, xxvi, 114
Polman, Paul, 174, 176
Porras, Jerry I., 9–11, 13
pragmatism, 43, 172
Prince, Matthew, 129
purpose and values integration, 46–47, 52
“purpose-driven” company, 5
purposefulness, 43, 172
Q
Quicken Loans, 159
QuikTrip, 68
R
Rabobank Nederland, 110
“Rally Cry” campaign, 154–156
Random Corporate Serial Killer game, 9–10
recruiting experience, 113
Red Bull, 179
Red Jacket Society, 133
REI, 176–178
REVPAR, 146
Rhoades, Ann, 17, 64, 69
Built on Values, 69
Ridge, Garry, 185
RightNow, 88
risk-taking, 43, 172
rituals, xxii, 41, 47–48, 123–130
Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, 31, 113
role-based segments, 104
Rosenberg, Jonathan, 81
Rossman, John, 53
S
Sabin, Scott, 114
Saginaw, Paul, 134
Salesforce, 123–125, 131
San Diego Regional Airport Authority, 82–83
“Let’s Go” campaign, 83
Sartain, Libby, 157
Schmidt, Eric, 81
Schultz, Howard, 29, 169
Schumann, Mark, 157
Seabra, Antonio Luiz da Cunha, 86
Sears, 80
Serafeim, George, 67
service brands, 32, 34
SHOW acronym, 144–145
Siebel Systems, 133
Skylofts, 144
small businesses, xxv
Smith, Gillian, 132
Somma, Mark di, 12
Sony, xiv, 11, 88
sophistication, 44, 172
Southwest Airlines, 53, 64, 78–79
Southwest Airlines, culture of, xiv
Squarespace, 11
standard operating procedures (SOPs), 135–136
standing out, 44, 172
Starbucks, 29, 53, 169–170
start-ups, xvi–xvii, xxv
status, 44, 172
Stritzke, Jerry, 177
style brands, 32, 35
Supervielle, Patricio, 20
symbolic inconsistency, 22
T
Takumi, Brian, 178–179
Tarjeta Naranja, 173–174
Telefónica, 154
Telenor, 153
Tencent, 115–116
Tenet Partners, 147
Thematic Apperception “Test” (TAT), 10
Think. Feel. Do exercise, 10
Tindell, Kip, 61
Toister, Jeff, 114
Tome, Brian, 15
Tomovich, Lilian, 144–145, 160, 183
Tower, 115
Traction, 139
training experience, 113–114
transparency, 44, 172
U
Uber’s organizational culture, xvii–xviii
Umpqua, 84
unifying employees, 24–27
Unilever, 174–175
“Unilever Sustainable Living Plan” (USLP), 174–175
uniqueness of company, 52–53
USAA, 31
V
value brands, 32, 34
value congruence, 21–22
values, see core values; organizational values, common
Valve, 115
Vanderbloemen, William, 113
Vanderbloemen Search Group, 113
Virgin enterprise, 29
Volkswagen, 59–60
W
Ward, Jonathan, 116
WD-40 Company, 17, 185
Weinzweig, Ari, 134, 136
Welch, Jack, xiii, 61, 69
Welch, Suzy, 69
well-known brands, xvii
Williams, Ardine, 26, 183
workplace environment experience, 115–116
X
Xradia, 11
Y
Yates, Darin, 15
YouGov BrandIndex, 98
Z
Zappos, 11, 16, 18
Zingerman’s, 124–125, 134–135, 140–141, 184
Staff Guide, 135–136
ZingTrain, 135
Zuckerberg, Mark, 7–8, 13
* Some perks aren’t as effective at motivating employees as
they might seem. A study on millennials in the workplace by
Qualtrics, an experience research platform, found that free
food is one of least important elements of culture. “Catered
lunches might boost employee morale once in a while,”
Qualtrics CEO and founder Ryan Smith says, “but it’s a
losing strategy if you’re trying to help your employees feel
like they’re an integral part of a thriving organization.” And
Dennis Eusebio, design leader at Tuft & Needle, says that
perks can end up being like a “siren song.” They have
“diminishing returns,” he writes in Entrepreneur. Employees
find, he says, that “you simply don’t value a foosball table
as much the tenth time you’ve played as the first time.”
(Sources: Smith, Ryan. “Free Food Is a Poor Excuse for
Company Culture.” Fortune, June 10, 2015.
http://fortune.com/2015/06/10/ryan-smith-retaining-
employees/. Eusebio, Dennis. “Why Office Perks Are Traps,
Not Benefits.” Entrepreneur, February 16, 2017.
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/289056.) * At the time
of this writing, a new CEO at Uber has just been named. The
new leader faces the formidable challenge of repairing
Uber’s brand identity and culture. Doing so will require
balancing two potentially conflicting forces: restoring the
stability the company needs to regain the trust of
customers, employees, and other stakeholders, while
reinvigorating the bold and convention-breaking culture it
needs to fuel innovation and reclaim a leadership position. I
will continue to provide perspectives on Uber and other
companies in this book as new developments unfold. Go to
http://deniseleeyohn.com/fusion for my latest insights.
* The asterisk and corresponding footnote is based on Nike
cofounder Bill Bowerman’s belief that “everyone has a body
and is therefore a potential athlete” and expresses how
universal the company believes its mission is. (Source: Nike.
“Mission Statement.” Accessed August 22, 2017.
https://help-en-us.nike.com/app/answer/a_id/113.) * To keep
it simple in this book, I use “purpose” to refer to any one of
the three types of statements in the examples I discuss,
regardless of the term that the organization might use.
* Among the leaders who recognize the importance of
communication as a core leadership skill are Jack Welch,
former GE CEO, and Kip Tindell, chairman of the board and
cofounder of The Container Store. Welch defines a leader as
someone who is able to communicate successfully, while
Tindell goes so far as to say, “Communication and
leadership are really the same thing.” (Sources: Braun,
Eduardo. 2016. People First Leadership: How the Best
Leaders Use Culture and Emotion to Drive Unprecedented
Results. Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill Education. Location
1815, Kindle. Tindell, Kip. 2014. Uncontainable: How
Passion, Commitment, and Conscious Capitalism Built a
Business Where Everyone Thrives. New York: Grand Central
Publishing. Page 138.)
* There is enough confusion between EX and employee
engagement that even two experts seem to offer conflicting
perspectives. Bruce Temkin, managing partner of the
customer experience firm Temkin Group, says organizations
should focus on employee engagement. “Employee
experience deals with how employees enjoy their job or
environment. It deals with making things fun and enjoyable.
Employee engagement deals with how committed
employees are to the mission of their organization.” But
Jacob Morgan, author of The Employee Experience
Advantage, believes that “engagement has been all about
the short-term cosmetic changes that organizations have
been trying to make to improve how they work.” He writes,
“If employee engagement is the short-term adrenaline shot,
then EX is the long-term redesign of the organization. It’s
focus is on the engine, not the paint and upholstery.”
(Sources: Temkin, Bruce. 2017. “Focus on Employee
Engagement, Not Employee Experience.” Experience
Matters, April 4, 2017.
https://experiencematters.blog/2017/04/20/focus-on-
employee-engagement-not-employee-experience. Morgan,
Jacob. 2017. The Employee Experience Advantage: How to
Win the War for Talent by Giving Employees the Workspaces
They Want, the Tools They Need, and a Culture They Can
Celebrate. New York: Wiley. Page 6.)
* In addition to their powerful culture-building impact, rituals
provide an additional benefit to an organization’s leaders.
Employee participation in them provides a gauge of the
culture. In Leading Teams, Guenzi and his coauthor describe
how Italian football manager Luigi Delneri uses a pregame
ritual as a “thermometer” to measure his team’s motivation
level. “Before the game begins we hold hands and shout ‘All
for one and one for all,’ ” Delneri says. “Even the way the
players shout tells you whether they are properly focused.”
(Source: Hackman, J. Richard. 2002. Leading Teams: Setting
the Stage for Great Performances. Brighton, Massachusetts.
Page 196.)
* Mitchell’s Forman, for example, assured me that she didn’t
have a big budget for The Mitchell Way Day; her team
redirected existing budget to do things “on the cheap.”
(Source: Mitchell, Jennifer. Interview with Denise Lee Yohn.
Telephone interview on July 19, 2017.)
* There are other ways to leverage your culture to
differentiate your brand. UPS promoted the color brown in
its advertising as a symbolic differentiator of its brand
because the color’s lack of flashiness aptly represented the
company’s culture of reliability and humility. And Zappos
showcased the generous and humorous attitude that
characterizes its culture by running ads using recordings of
actual customer service calls with its representatives
gracefully handling unusual customer demands.