Writing a coursework, especially on a complex topic like Mei Numerical Methods, can be quite

challenging for many students. It requires a deep understanding of the subject matter, extensive
research, analytical skills, and the ability to articulate ideas coherently. Moreover, time constraints
and other academic commitments can further add to the pressure.

For those struggling with coursework writing or seeking assistance to ensure a high-quality
submission, I recommend considering professional academic writing services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔. These services offer expert assistance from qualified writers who specialize in
various academic fields, including Mathematics and Numerical Methods. By entrusting your
coursework to such services, you can benefit from:

1. Expertise: Writers at ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ are well-versed in the intricacies of Mei

Numerical Methods and can deliver coursework that demonstrates a profound understanding
of the subject.
2. Originality: Plagiarism-free work is crucial in academic writing, and professional services
ensure that all content is original and tailored to your specific requirements.
3. Timely Delivery: With looming deadlines, timely submission is vital. ⇒ HelpWriting.net
⇔ understands the importance of punctuality and strives to deliver completed coursework
within the specified timeframe.
4. Customization: Each coursework assignment is unique, and professional services like ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ tailor their approach to meet individual needs, ensuring that your
coursework aligns with your academic goals and preferences.
5. Quality Assurance: Professional writing services maintain high standards of quality, ensuring
that your coursework is well-researched, structured, and formatted according to academic
conventions.

While seeking external assistance for coursework writing is a viable option, it's essential to choose a
reputable service like ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ to ensure reliability and quality. By doing so, students
can alleviate the stress associated with coursework and focus on other aspects of their academic
journey.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. All these methods require the use of an excel spreadsheet since all methods require
iterations which will get closer and closer to the real answer (converge). Here I assumed that the
ratio difference would continue to be 0.25, according to the theory, so I suggest error might have
occurred because some values of the ratio of differences may not be 0.25 precisely. By doing this,
most of the time the sequence gets closer to the final answer thus it converges. This resource hasn't
been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this
resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. This
creates the secant method, this requires two approximations, x (0) and x (1). I intend to use the
trapezium and Mid-point rule as these are on of the basis in which the approximation can be found.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
Normally a solution of a mathematical problem of this nature requires the root of an equation.
Bundle OCR MEI Core 3 Numerical Methods Coursework Slides This is a set of 5 Powerpoints and
accompanying materials for teachers to use in guiding their students through the C3 coursework.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Also attached is a differentiated set of starter tasks linking back to the previous section
(the 'rearrangement method'). Microsoft Excel might find it complicated to solve square roots. Since
x appears twice in the equation, the problem cannot be solved algebraically. So therefore it is a
suitable method for the equation. As explained earlier the method of bisection requires an interval
which supports the sign change argument. We then do G(x 1 ), and so on; this is called a recurrence
relation. The other methods can be converted into formulas and inputted into excel which can easily
perform multiple iterations, simply by dragging down the cells. It will only be a approximation as the
value of our roots are approximations. However, this method is very tiresome to calculate by hand
and the tiniest mistake can result in a wrong answer. Write a review Update existing review Submit
review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. In order to improve on this approximation we could
find the root to more D.P as explained earlier. The secant method always uses the two most recent
approximations of the root. The difference between the two methods is that the secant method uses
two approximations which are the most recent approximations of the root. For example we can
change the value of K and the formula would take this into account and would calculate the new root
accordingly. Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your
happiness. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 50% A bundle is a package of
resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. Also to
improve the validity of my result Simpson’s rule could have been used. Write a review Update
existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. According to syllabus on
NM module, the approximate methods of definite integrals may be determined by numerical
integration using.
The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. It was not hard
to use but tricky, due to the different options available. In the end I chose excel for multiple reasons
which include. This is then divided by the function of the second approximation minus the function
of the first approximation to give the third approximation. So therefore it is a suitable method for the
equation. Also attached is a differentiated set of starter tasks linking back to the previous section (the
'rearrangement method'). Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to
leave some feedback. An equation can have more than one root, in order to find both roots we have
to rearrange the equation so it equals x and use fixed point iteration for both equations. Our customer
service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 28 September 2019
Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook
Share through pinterest RadicalResourcesEmperor's Shop 5.00 3 reviews Not the right resource.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. The
Newton-Raphson method was the quickest, finding the root within a certain degree of accuracy in
only three iterations. In order to improve on this approximation we could find the root to more D.P
as explained earlier. I also used the autograph version 3 to draw the graph s as this would make my
graph neat and easier to understand. Review 5 Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is
required to reflect your happiness. Normally a solution of a mathematical problem of this nature
requires the root of an equation. Each method is explained with examples, and the key element
assessed are highlighted. ?5.00 Reviews Select overall rating (no rating) Your rating is required to
reflect your happiness. I will make a spreadsheet with formulas that satisfy both H(x) and g(x) and
drag it down to 9 significant figures. Get this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 50% A
bundle is a package of resources grouped together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in
one place. I will make a spreadsheet with a formula that satisfies this method and I will perform
multiple iterations until my answer reaches 9 significant figures. See other similar resources ?2.00
(no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Bundle OCR
MEI Core 3 Numerical Methods Coursework Slides This is a set of 5 Powerpoints and
accompanying materials for teachers to use in guiding their students through the C3 coursework. It
must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail. This
resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. This assumption was made according to the theory above. Although making the tables
can be repetitive, any faults can easily be rectified. The other methods can be converted into
formulas and inputted into excel which can easily perform multiple iterations, simply by dragging
down the cells. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only
customers who have purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it
violates our terms and conditions. Below is the formula which is involved in the calculation. This is
then divided by the function of the second approximation minus the function of the first
approximation to give the third approximation.
See other similar resources ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. The false position method also uses two approximations; it uses the most recent
approximation of the root and the most recent root which has the opposite sign of the most recent
approximation of the root. This is because in Simpson’s rule error is proportional to, which means it is
a fourth order method and also when you halve the width of the strip or you equivalently doubled
the number of strips, this would reduced the absolute error with a scale factor of 0.0625. Get this
resource as part of a bundle and save up to 50% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together
to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. See other similar resources ?4.00 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. Due to this I
suggest that this problem will be appropriate for numerical solution. In the same way there are
equations which cannot be solved algebraically and require numerical methods to approximate the
root. Since x appears twice in the equation, the problem cannot be solved algebraically. Our customer
service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017
Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook
Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. A spreadsheet can be
created for this method hence this method can be used to solve the equation. This creates the secant
method, this requires two approximations, x (0) and x (1). Our customer service team will review
your report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 28 September 2019 Share this Share
through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through
pinterest RadicalResourcesEmperor's Shop 5.00 3 reviews Not the right resource. However from this
we can conclude that the false position method does not have a first order convergence. Each
boundary is tested for sign change which indicates that a root exists between them. In order for it to
be a geometric progression it must have a common multiple. We then do G(x 1 ), and so on; this is
called a recurrence relation. However they clearly are not, this means the secant method does not
have first order convergence. See other similar resources ?4.00 5.00 1 review BUY NOW Save for
later Not quite what you were looking for. Our customer service team will review your report and
will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email Share
through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74
4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. Microsoft Excel might find it complicated to solve square
roots. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0
reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right
resource. I will be using the method of bisection, fixed point iteration, secant method and false
position method. I will make a spreadsheet with a formula that satisfies this method and I will
perform multiple iterations until my answer reaches 9 significant figures. An equation can have more
than one root, in order to find both roots we have to rearrange the equation so it equals x and use
fixed point iteration for both equations. It was not hard to use but tricky, due to the different options
available. Although making the tables can be repetitive, any faults can easily be rectified. The
presentation highlights the requirements of the 'comparison section'. The difference between the two
methods is that the secant method uses two approximations which are the most recent
approximations of the root. I also used the autograph version 3 to draw the graph s as this would
make my graph neat and easier to understand. Second was the Decimal Search, which took five
iterations and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the most number of iterations, 6.
The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which is found.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback.
Below is the formula which is involved in the calculation. Review 5 Select overall rating (no rating)
Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. I intend to use the trapezium and Mid-point rule as
these are on of the basis in which the approximation can be found. Our customer service team will
review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00
(no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share
through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through
pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. This resource hasn't been reviewed yet
To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have purchased this resource can review it
Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and conditions. See other similar resources
?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. The
Powerpoint is animated to demonstrate the key idea of tangent sliding while also showing how the
method looks when performed in Excel and using Autograph software. This assumption was made
according to the theory above. The secant method always uses the two most recent approximations
of the root. All these methods require the use of an excel spreadsheet since all methods require
iterations which will get closer and closer to the real answer (converge). In order to improve on this
approximation we could find the root to more D.P as explained earlier. However from this we can
conclude that the false position method does not have a first order convergence. This is because the
tangent crosses the asymptote, as shown below. In some cases you may not be able to differentiate
f(x). Also to improve the validity of my result Simpson’s rule could have been used. Get this
resource as part of a bundle and save up to 50% A bundle is a package of resources grouped together
to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. This is then divided by the function of
the second approximation minus the function of the first approximation to give the third
approximation. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some
feedback. Made up of past exam questions and some questions I have made myself. Our customer
service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017
Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook
Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. Reviews Select overall
rating (no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness. Write a review Update existing
review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. See other similar resources ?2.00 (no
rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were looking for. This means for the
false position method to work, the two approximations of the root used in the formula, their
functions would have to be opposites. The final(green) values should all be approximately the same.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. As a result the value of K is a constant when the first order of convergence is used. Excel
was used because it made my work easier, this because you don’t need to calculate everything, once
the formula is given and some calculations are done, you just need to drag the cell down and the
answers emerges.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 10
October 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right resource. See
other similar resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you
were looking for. The x where the sign change occurs in now the new boundaries and tested for sign
change again. The other methods can be converted into formulas and inputted into excel which can
easily perform multiple iterations, simply by dragging down the cells. Here I assumed that the ratio
difference would continue to be 0.25, according to the theory, so I suggest error might have occurred
because some values of the ratio of differences may not be 0.25 precisely. This means for the false
position method to work, the two approximations of the root used in the formula, their functions
would have to be opposites. It was adopted, because it would help me to approximate the region
under the graph using strips of. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in
touch. ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?5.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW
Save for later Last updated 10 October 2017 Share this Share through email Share through twitter
Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews
Not the right resource. Also it was used because it calculated to more decimal places than a
calculator. It must still be rearranged manually though, and a large proportion of rearrangements fail.
The Powerpoint is animated to demonstrate the key idea of tangent sliding while also showing how
the method looks when performed in Excel and using Autograph software. Write a review Update
existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. A spreadsheet can be
created for this method hence this method can be used to solve the equation. This occurred due to
some limitation which might have occurred. An equation can have more than one root, in order to
find both roots we have to rearrange the equation so it equals x and use fixed point iteration for both
equations. Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?2.00 (no rating)
0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last
updated 22 February 2018 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through
linkedin Share through facebook Share through pinterest Gaspode74 4.84 46 reviews Not the right
resource. Something to consider is that with the inclusion of a negative sign all of my roots have
been removed from the range I have been investigating. This task can be tedious to carry on doing it
again and again especially for different values of K and if it has a lot of iterations, hence we use a
spreadsheet. For example we can change the value of K and the formula would take this into account
and would calculate the new root accordingly. So therefore it is a suitable method for the equation.
Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some feedback. Get
this resource as part of a bundle and save up to 50% A bundle is a package of resources grouped
together to teach a particular topic, or a series of lessons, in one place. Our customer service team
will review your report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later
?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 28 September 2019 Share this
Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share through facebook Share
through pinterest RadicalResourcesEmperor's Shop 5.00 3 reviews Not the right resource. See other
similar resources ?2.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Not quite what you were
looking for. The diagram above shows that the gradient of g(x) is within this range at the root which
is found. The interval in which the root has to lie in is, 0.4797310065. Therefore the only way to
conclude the best method is to look at the amount of iterations used, the rate of convergence. Also to
improve the validity of my result Simpson’s rule could have been used. Each method is explained
with examples, and the key element assessed are highlighted. ?5.00 Reviews Select overall rating
(no rating) Your rating is required to reflect your happiness.
Our customer service team will review your report and will be in touch. ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews
BUY NOW Save for later ?4.00 (no rating) 0 reviews BUY NOW Save for later Last updated 28
September 2019 Share this Share through email Share through twitter Share through linkedin Share
through facebook Share through pinterest RadicalResourcesEmperor's Shop 5.00 3 reviews Not the
right resource. I will produce an answer to 9 significant figures by the use of excel; I should be able
to produce a formula on excel for the secant method thus making this method suitable for this
equation. The value of g'(x) at this point is far greater than 1, so the iterations do not converge. In the
end I chose excel for multiple reasons which include. While with a calculator we would have to start
from scratch. By doing this, most of the time the sequence gets closer to the final answer thus it
converges. Therefore the only way to conclude the best method is to look at the amount of iterations
used, the rate of convergence. This occurred due to some limitation which might have occurred.
However they clearly are not, this means the secant method does not have first order convergence.
This assumption was made according to the theory above. However, this method is very tiresome to
calculate by hand and the tiniest mistake can result in a wrong answer. Also, the formula is iterative,
therefore, it is not very time consuming. The graph appears to have some form of geometric
progression if we look at the graph. The Powerpoint is animated to demonstrate the key idea of
tangent sliding while also showing how the method looks when performed in Excel and using
Autograph software. In the sense that there are equations which cannot be integrated and require
numerical methods to approximate the answer, eg the midpoint rule. Suitable for OCR B (MEI) and
other exam boards given the substantial overlap that exists. I can only obtain an approximation of the
solution as it is impossible or hard to find the exact value of the function. I also used the autograph
version 3 to draw the graph s as this would make my graph neat and easier to understand. This
resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Write a review Update existing review Submit review Cancel It's good to leave some
feedback. Then test this value to see if it’s positive or negative, dependent on the result the interval
then becomes smaller, hence the answer gets closer to the real answer (converges). In order to find a
better interval, add the upper and lower bounds of the estimate and divide by 2 in order to obtain the
middle value. Also to improve the validity of my result Simpson’s rule could have been used. So I
suggest error might have occurred, therefore affecting the validity of my result. Covers everything on
the advance material list for OCR (B). Second was the Decimal Search, which took five iterations
and last was the Rearrangement Method, which took the most number of iterations, 6. It was
adopted, because it would help me to approximate the region under the graph using strips of. So
therefore the higher the rate of convergence the quicker the method reaches the final approximation.
This resource hasn't been reviewed yet To ensure quality for our reviews, only customers who have
purchased this resource can review it Report this resource to let us know if it violates our terms and
conditions. Bundle OCR MEI Core 3 Numerical Methods Coursework Slides This is a set of 5
Powerpoints and accompanying materials for teachers to use in guiding their students through the C3
coursework.