Sustainable Procurement
Sustainable Procurement
Sustainable Procurement
Food containers
Beverage containers
Cigarette butts
Plastic bags
IT Hardware
IT hardware and computing tools is another category that has a
lot of sustainability factors to consider. For instance, say you are
buying desktop computers. These are just a few of the ways
sustainability could be...
Economic factors: Purchase price, depreciation, repairs,
maintenance, downtime, etc.
Social factors: diversity in the supply base, employee wellness,
labor conditions in manufacturing, ethical sourcing practices, etc.
Environmental factors: Energy and water use, carbon footprint,
end-of-life disposal, etc.
So how could procurement make sure their computer sourcing
addresses these concerns? For companies like Microsoft, up to
77% of their emissions are a result of upstream and downstream
scope 3 emissions (their suppliers' supplier's carbon footprint as
well as the footprint of consumers).
Cacao
Cacao is a notoriously unsustainable ingredient in many farming
systems, using too much water, disturbing ecological diversity,
and using child labor.
The chocolate maker Fazer has focused on supplier
development in order to address the root causes of
unsustainable cacao farming: poverty.
Fazer also works to carefully select suppliers and partners that
comply with its Supplier Code of Conduct. 80% of the 5 million
cocoa farmers around the world are not within the scope of any
certification program. Hence it’s necessary to ensure there are
sustainable development programs in place and alternative
methods for ensuring the responsibility of supply chains.
Conclusion
In summary, sustainable procurement is gaining traction as an essential
practice for businesses aiming to reduce their environmental impact
and contribute to a circular economy.
The significance of sustainability is emphasized, not only as a
commitment to corporate social responsibility but also for regulatory
compliance and performance measurement.
The showcased examples serve as inspiration for businesses looking to
align their operations with global sustainability goals, fostering a more
environmentally conscious and socially responsible business landscape.
Fostered innovation
Sustainable policies also have the potential to drive innovation in a
company's products and operations in several ways, which include:
Food giant General Mills has a tremendous ability to impact and influence change.
Fortunately, they use their position to improve working conditions and protect the
environment. Their sustainable and responsible sourcing website provides a lot of detailed
information about their practices. For example, you can learn how they source ingredients as
well as how they support the farms that provide them.
As a firm that offers procurement consulting, it makes sense that Bain and Company would
have a public-facing sustainability statement. On their website, you’ll find a lot of excellent
resources. Bain & Co. break their goals into four categories including, environment, business
ethics, labor and human rights and community development. Additionally, you can download
their supplier code of conduct and sustainable procurement policy.
As the parent company of brands like Ben and Jerry’s, Dove and Seventh Generation,
Unilever is a massive organization. Additionally, most of their companies create a physical
product, which means they source a lot of goods and materials. Accordingly, they have an in-
depth procurement sustainability policy that includes information on their environmental
policies, supplier diversity, human rights, climate change and more.
Sustainable Procurement: Benefits and Best Practices
Precoro
2,985 followers
Follow
It's no secret that nowadays customers want to know where the products they
purchase come from and what they are made of, business partners want to work with
reputable organizations, and employees tend to seek jobs with safe and comfortable
working conditions.
In this newsletter, we'll explore why sustainable procurement matters and how to
implement environmental and social responsibility in your organization's workflow.
Decreased Costs
In 2021 the industrial sector accounted for 33% of total energy consumption in the
US, and this number was expected to increase even further. But in 2023, inflation and
the energy crisis triggered by Russia's war in Ukraine may put businesses in a tough
spot and force them to look for ways to cut back on their energy usage.
Nowadays, more and more people have become eco-conscious and are seeking out
ethical products and organizations. According to First Insight's recent report, nearly
90% of Gen X customers said they are willing to pay an extra 10% or more for
sustainable products, a notable increase from just over 34% in 2019.
Reduced Risks
Unsustainable supply chains pose environmental risks that can harm the planet in
many ways, including air and water pollution, loss of biodiversity, deforestation, to
name a few. By sourcing materials and suppliers that emphasize sustainability,
businesses can reduce their carbon footprint and the amount of waste they produce,
minimizing the company's environmental impact.
Sourcing irresponsibly might also lead to legal and regulatory risks, such as violation
of environmental, labor, and other regulations; any of these can result in the loss of
operating licenses. Similarly, adhering to responsible purchasing practices prevents
costly fines and penalties and helps protect an organization’s long-term reputation.
Loss of customers isn't the only potential downside of a bad corporate image;
operating in a way that violates ESG principles with discrimination, poor working
conditions, etc., might also make it hard to keep or hire employees.
People are looking to buy from companies that share their values and make them
feel their purchase has a positive, or at least not harmful, impact on society and the
environment. Being able to demonstrate that your practices, including procurement,
are sustainable will help your company build a long-lasting emotional connection
with customers and gain their trust.
Improved Compliance
For a business to operate and be secure from possible lawsuits, compliance with
required environmental and social regulations is a must. Businesses can also take
extra steps for sustainability beyond what is legally required by partnering with social
entrepreneurs and sponsoring environmental and social initiatives that address
climate change, homelessness, poverty, etc.; doing so will boost brand recognition
and set it apart from competitors.
Second, identify strategic and critical suppliers using supplier segmentation, and
evaluate their ability to meet your organization's sustainability goals. This assessment
should include environmental and social impact, labor standards, and ethical
business practices. In addition, check that suppliers comply with the purchasing
contracts they entered into with your organization, and assess their ability to make
deliveries on time and provide you with high-quality products.
Finally, develop an open channel for communication with suppliers and ensure you
have visibility into their performance. To achieve this, implement a tool for supplier
management. For example, Precoro offers a Suppliers Portal, where vendors are able
to receive POs, send invoices for received orders, attach additional documents and
notes, and engage in the RFP process.
Moreover, Precoro provides all the necessary tools for managing suppliers by
allowing users to:
Import an unlimited number of suppliers and keep their information in one place.
Customize registration forms and adjust mandatory fields such as legal address,
account number, etc.
Store suppliers' catalogs.
Order items directly from Precoro.
Send POs to suppliers in just a few clicks.
Monitor what is already sent/not sent.
Control budgets and generate reports.
Establishing such a supplier management system comes with the added bonuses of
better purchasing terms and more timely delivery, among others.
Sustainable inventory management and logistics bring many benefits to the business,
including less raw material consumption, lower energy use, reduced waste, and
increased savings.
To reduce their impact, businesses can also reuse product packaging and storage
containers as well as implement a system for recycling paper, plastic, and glass.
At the same time, it's important to make sure inventory isn't too high or too low. Too
much stock is wasteful in terms of the actual product as well as the transport of it.
Utilize demand forecasting and just-in-time inventory strategies to accomplish this.
Plus, it comes with an added bonus: more financial savings!
Fortunately, you can maintain the proper balance by using a dedicated tool for
inventory management. Software like Precoro makes it easy to accurately track real-
time inventory levels, analyze usage data, and properly forecast demand.
Add, update, and edit the stock balance of each warehouse within the platform and
track item history at any time.
Create customizable reports on stock balance and purchases for a certain period.
See ordered items and those to be received.
Define usage patterns for different products or services and forecast inventory
consumption.
Set parameters for the stock minimum and receive instant notifications via email as
soon as stock levels are low.
Create an order for the low-stock items without entering the data manually. The
system automatically identifies the supplies that need to be replenished.
How do you decide whether key suppliers provide the desired value or whether it's
time to source new ones due to no transparency in supplier performance? How can
businesses ensure they are not overspending or procuring unnecessary or duplicate
products if approval workflows aren't optimized and spend data is scattered across
different tools?
Sustainable procurement isn't just about reusing resources. It's about having a clear
picture of who is buying what, why, from whom, and how processes can be improved
to reduce waste and increase compliance.
Businesses seeking to achieve spend and procurement process visibility should invest
in a solution where correct and up-to-date data is available in one centralized place.
For example, Precoro users can use any device to easily access procurement
information, including real-time document and budget statuses, revision history,
approval workflows, inventory levels, and much more.
In addition, Precoro allows you to not only generate a bunch of customized reports
on the platform itself but also transfer procurement information to Power BI, Google
Sheets, and accounting tools like Xero and QuickBooks Online. Users can even set up
automatic report generation to save extra time on filtering and exporting.
Guidelines for Green Procurement
FINAL WORDS
Sourcing and procurement teams are well-positioned to drive ESG
initiatives that create economic, environmental, and social benefits for
companies and the communities they serve.
From leveraging supplier data to reducing environmental and carbon
footprints, procurement can help companies reach their sustainability goals.
As younger consumers age, pressure on brands to adopt sustainability
measures will certainly grow. Adopting sustainable procurement and
sourcing practices is an effective and strategic way to future-proof your
business.
Two-thirds of the average company’s environment, social, and governance footprint lies with
suppliers. Procurement leaders who take bold action can make a decisive difference in
sustainability.
DOWNLOADS
Article (7 pages)
Companies have many reasons to focus on environmental, social, and governance (ESG)
issues. They may want to satisfy their consumers, who are increasingly choosing brands with
strong ESG credentials, even if the prices are higher. Or they may be seeking to stay ahead of
ever more stringent regulations. Others react to pressure from banks and investors, want to
improve employee engagement, or feel a need to better attract and retain talent. For most
organizations, the answer will be a combination of these factors, which together add up to a
need to understand and manage environmental impact through every part of the business—in
real time.
Leading players are already capturing real benefits from their efforts. Our colleagues’
analysis shows that top ESG performers enjoy faster growth and higher valuations than other
players in their sectors, by a margin of 10 to 20 percent in each case. Strong ESG credentials
drive down costs by 5 to 10 percent, as these companies focus on operational efficiency and
waste reduction. Furthermore, ESG excellence reduces transition risk by helping companies
stay ahead of changes in regulation and stakeholder sentiment.
ESG leadership begins at home, but it can’t stay there. That’s where procurement’s role
becomes so critical. Many companies are already running highly successful initiatives to
optimize resource consumption within their operations or engage with their local
communities, for example, but the environmental and social footprint of a business extends
far beyond its own walls. For most products, 80 to 90 percent of greenhouse-gas emissions
are “Scope 3”: indirect emissions that occur across the company’s value chain, such as
embedded emissions in purchased goods and services, employee travel and commuting, and
the use and end-of-life treatment of sold products. Of these emissions, two-thirds are usually
from the upstream supply chain. Tier-n suppliers are also more difficult to monitor,
increasing the risk that poor environmental or labor practices go unnoticed.
When we asked these CPOs why they haven’t built ESG into the organization’s sourcing
DNA, it became clear that most felt they lacked the necessary tools, skills, and data. Seventy
percent of our sample said their organizations didn’t understand where Scope 3 emissions
were generated in their value chain, for example. Ninety percent told us they had difficulty
identifying the right actions to move the needle on ESG topics, and almost three-quarters
didn’t know what ESG targets to set.
Exhibit 1
We strive to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our website. If you would
like information about this content we will be happy to work with you. Please email us
at: McKinsey_Website_Accessibility@mckinsey.com
1. Determine the baseline and how far to go. Understand and quantify the organization’s
current ESG footprint. Identify the most significant risk areas and improvement
opportunities. Determine what matters most in the context of the company’s overall
ESG agenda. And set goals and targets for sustainable procurement.
2. Establish the core and drive value-creation initiatives. Define ESG metrics and
policies that will be integrated into the organization’s standard supplier selection,
procurement, and supply-management processes. In parallel, select a number of top-
priority ESG themes and address them via in-depth cross-functional innovation and
improvement initiatives, such as collaborating with value-chain partners to
decarbonize emissions-intensive areas of the supply chain.
3. Shift the organization. Scale up and roll out successful initiatives. Integrate
sustainable purchasing practices into the organization. Continuously train the
procurement community on sustainable procurement principles and their application.
Track performance against targets.
You can’t start a journey unless you know where you are, and where you want to go. For
procurement organizations, there are several ways to address these key questions. To
understand the ESG footprint of the supply base, companies can take an internal approach,
asking suppliers to provide detailed information on their own ESG impact, both overall and
by category. Alternatively, they can use the external data sources offered by specialist ESG
analysis and rating companies. Such analyses will inevitably be incomplete, but a top-down
evaluation of the supplier base helps procurement organizations take the lead in identifying
the most significant risks and improvement opportunities in the upstream value chain.
Benchmarking can reveal hidden ESG strengths within the value chain, as well as show
companies where they need to improve to match or outperform industry norms.
Many companies also find it useful to benchmark their ESG performance against those of
competitors and players in other industries. This can reveal hidden ESG strengths within the
value chain, as well as show companies where they need to improve to match or outperform
industry norms.
Alongside these top-down analyses, organizations that are serious about sustainable
procurement will want to take a deeper dive into the ESG performance of their most
important value chains. This can be done by working with key suppliers to conduct an “ESG
teardown” of the supply chain, looking at the environmental and social impact of activity
through every supply-chain tier.
Using data and analytics, companies are also building upon and evolving practices already
used by high-maturity procurement and product development organizations, employing new
approaches to look at the impact of their products and services. For example, procurement
experts have long been familiar with cleansheet analysis of component and raw-materials
costs. “Resource cleansheets” build on that foundation, creating a granular assessment of both
monetary cost and carbon footprint for every component and manufacturing step involved in
building a product. Over time, this approach generates a common language that the
engineering and sustainability organization can use to quantify and evaluate materials and
technology for their cost and emissions trade-offs (Exhibit 2). Such exercises require good
data sources and skilled analysts, but they are a powerful way to pinpoint and reduce major
sources of greenhouse-gas emissions.
Exhibit 2
We strive to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our website. If you would
like information about this content we will be happy to work with you. Please email us
at: McKinsey_Website_Accessibility@mckinsey.com
Once procurement leaders understand the ESG footprint of their organization’s value chain,
they can begin to implement new practices that seek to address risks and capture value-
creation opportunities. Many of these procurement practices can be integrated into the
organization’s standard sourcing and supplier-management processes.
Reinforce that ESG always matters. One consumer products company, for example, decided
to take action when it uncovered unfair labor practices at an overseas component supplier.
Not only did these practices present a reputational risk to the company, they also threatened
the stability of its supply chain, since switching to an alternative supplier created significant
delivery delays. The company responded to this issue by introducing a requirement that all
potential suppliers provide documentation of their ESG practices as part of its standard RFx
(request for x) process. The first time the exercise was run, only seven out of 12 candidate
suppliers were able to fulfill the request. Since the cost of mitigating ESG risk through
regular checks and audits would outweigh any potential savings offered by suppliers without
strong ESG systems, the company included the presence of such systems in its primary
supplier-qualification criteria for all future sourcing projects.
Other companies consider carbon emissions as part of the RFx process, weighing suppliers
according to carbon intensity and their impact on the company’s Scope 3 emissions, in
addition to criteria such as cost, quality, and delivery performance. More mature companies
even apply “internal carbon pricing,” creating a profit-and-loss penalty for business units that
source products with high carbon emissions.
Core sustainable-sourcing practices should also include demand-side efforts. Simply making
internal customers aware of the carbon emissions generated by products and services can
encourage lower-impact behavior in areas such as business travel or indirect purchasing.
Requiring business units to measure, report, and reduce their Scope 3 carbon footprint can be
even more effective in reducing a company’s ESG footprint from procured materials and
services.
Leading procurement organizations are achieving big leaps in sustainability by focusing time
and effort on targeted value-creation initiatives. Often beginning with small pilot projects,
these initiatives allow teams to explore all of the available options, develop and test new
approaches, find out which ones matter most, and then apply them at scale across the entire
enterprise and its supply chain—to lasting impact.
At one major consumer goods manufacturer, for example, procurement now orchestrates
purchases of electricity from renewable sources for more than 200 offices and production
facilities worldwide. The company entered into new power-purchase agreements with
renewable-energy suppliers across the globe, securing beneficial pricing by bundling demand
from multiple sites. In the next phase of the initiative, it is addressing its Scope 3 emissions
by working with major tier-one suppliers to encourage them to make the same transition. As
part of that process, it allows those suppliers to source their power through its energy
procurement platform.
At another consumer goods player, the procurement organization used an agile sourcing
approach to reduce the company’s reliance on virgin petroleum-based feedstocks. In a series
of weeklong “sprints,” procurement teams first conducted a market scan to identify candidate
feedstocks produced from alternative sources including recycled plastics and agricultural
waste. They then evaluated the economic, environmental, and technological maturity of the
most promising candidates before finally developing a detailed business case, cost models,
and go-to-market approach for four possible new feedstocks. The effort identified
opportunities to reduce annual carbon emissions by around a million tons over a one- to five-
year time frame.
Other procurement teams have made significant sustainability gains through expanding
collaboration with suppliers. One global retailer pursued a multipronged strategy with
agricultural suppliers in emerging markets, which included the introduction of longer-term
contracts to encourage capacity investments, and support for the adoption of technologies
such as hothouses and drip irrigation. After several years, the effort generated annual savings
of more than $300 million as suppliers increased their yields while reducing input costs. At
the same time, reducing consumption of water and fertilizer helped to cut risks associated
with spikes in commodity prices or water scarcity.
Another company, this time in the pharmaceutical sector, worked with its end customers and
distribution partner to replace single-use secondary packaging with a durable, returnable
container for temperature-controlled shipments. Careful, user-centric design of the packaging
and returns process helped the organizations to achieve a 98 percent return rate, well above
their initial target of 80 percent. The project eliminated 500 tons of packaging waste and
generated savings of almost $4 million.
The final step in the development of a sustainable procurement function is a set of actions
that embed strong ESG practices into the organization. Procurement teams will need to learn
how to evaluate the ESG credentials of potential suppliers, for example, and how to use
carbon accounting principles to compare the impact of different supply options. Scaling up
flagship sustainability initiatives into company-wide policies may require investment in new
technical skills for supplier development teams, which can then engage with suppliers to
educate, evangelize, and address specific capability gaps.
The procurement function will need new tools and data sources, too, to enable ESG supply
chain teardowns and resource cleansheeting, or to facilitate the identification of suppliers
with favorable ESG footprints or novel technologies that could help the organization achieve
its sustainability goals.
Finally, companies will need to track sustainability alongside other targets, and adapt their
incentive and performance-management systems to ensure the efforts of procurement teams
and internal customers are aligned with the organization’s sustainability goals.
As companies seek to reduce the negative environmental and social impact of their activities,
they are discovering that many of the biggest risks and opportunities are found in the
upstream supply chain. That puts the procurement function at the front line of the transition to
sustainable business models. Ambitious CPOs should act now to ensure they have the tools,
data, and capabilities needed to support this shift.
To test your readiness, try listing the three ways that the purchasing function could have the
largest impact on your company’s ESG footprint. What would take to achieve that impact?
How could procurement become a primary driver of sustainability within your organization?
Surveys show that for most companies today, goals such as risk mitigation,
supply chain resilience, and the contribution these can make to their
sustainability targets are more important than aiming for further cost
reductions in procurement. These are all goals that can be achieved with
sustainable procurement. And more than that: Being highly cross-functional,
procurement is predestined to embed sustainability along all three ESG
dimensions (environment, social, governance) throughout the entire company,
thereby exerting an influence at all points along the value chain (see Figure 1)
and thus leveraging further potential. Not only does this engender greater
supply security through more resilient supply chains, it also serves to improve
the brand image, which in turn helps to retain existing customers and attract
new ones. Last but not least, the shared goal of sustainability also deepens
and improves business partnerships with suppliers and customers and
strengthens employee commitment.
Sustainable procurement therefore holds considerable potential, but
harnessing this for your own company will take more than just complying with
national or international regulations and laws on environmental protection,
employee rights or reporting obligations. Voluntary industry standards or
voluntary commitments that go above and beyond this and are based on the
expectations of customers and investors would be a good start. Yet, they are
rarely enough to form a basis for a well-functioning and comprehensive
concept with which to fully exploit all of the potential that exists. That is why
the pioneers of sustainable procurement go one step further and rethink their
business model to enable the concept to unfold its full effectiveness (see
Figure 2).
One such pioneer in sustainable procurement and supply chain management
is a sports equipment manufacturer from Germany: The company actively
tracks its entire supply chain, supports material suppliers and works closely
with institutions to ensure sustainability end-to-end and to introduce binding
limits on critical substances. In doing so, it indirectly contributes to the
reduction of waste and emissions at the product user's end as well, thus
reinforcing its own corporate and brand identity and bolstering the resilience of
its supply chains, especially in the face of the external challenges of the day.
Another example how to make things happen in the area of sustainability is
showcased by two major French corporates: They signed a partnership for
polymer recycling in order to cope with their target of 30% recycled content in
interior trim for vehicles.
But it's not just sporting goods or cosmetics companies with their sensitive
target groups that see an advantage in striving for sustainability beyond the
legal regulations and voluntary commitments within the industry: A German
pharmaceutical manufacturer – an industry that has certainly struggled with
the issue of sustainability in the past – is working on an internal carbon pricing
system for all its investments in a bid to significantly reduce emissions along
the supply chain. The company has also joined others in founding the
Sustainable Procurement Pledge (SPP), an international, nonprofit
organization that promotes knowledge of responsible procurement practices.
One of the founding members of the SPP is a major German consumer goods
conglomerate: Among other objectives, it has set itself the goal of basing all
procurement decisions on the three sustainability pillars of climate
friendliness, circular economy and social progress. And last but not least,
there are pioneers and also followers in the IT sector, who are committed to
reducing the environmental footprint of their data centers by e.g., creating new
businesses around supplier assessments to perform ESG-related audits or
inquiries.
An additional benefit of the transparency that this offers lies in the fact that
companies can support their suppliers in their climate protection efforts and
thus reduce upstream greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the supply chain.
Even though Scope 3 emissions in the European emissions trading system
are not yet officially attributed to the processing stage of the value chain, they
are increasingly being included in companies' GHG footprints because
stakeholders such as investors, customers and the general public are
demanding it. Here, too, it makes sense to go beyond the legal requirements,
for example by voluntarily offsetting greenhouse gas emissions generated by
suppliers or customers during the useful life of products.
The carbon price currently stands at around 100 euros per ton and will rise
significantly in the future (see Figure 4). It is becoming increasingly important
as a cost factor. With Scope 3 emissions accounting for 50 to 80 percent of a
company's total emissions, depending on industry, procurement has
considerable potential to bring emissions and thus costs down. Procurement
managers would therefore be well advised to develop appropriate strategies
around this issue together with their suppliers.
Sustainable Procurement
U-M recognizes the importance of sustainable—and socially responsible—procurement and
its economic and environmental impact to the community. Sustainable procurement refers to
the purchasing of products and services that have a reduced effect on human health and the
environment when compared with competing products or services.
This comparison considers a variety of factors, including raw materials acquisition,
production, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, reuse, operation, maintenance, or
disposal. Examples of sustainable products include—but are not limited to—products that:
Are made from recycled or environmentally preferable content.
Article (6 pages)
Companies are ramping up their climate commitments, and with them their ambitions to
source materials—such as green steel, recycled aluminum, and recycled plastic—that have
lower emissions intensity than their conventional equivalents. Production capacity for many
low-emissions materials, however, appears set to fall far short of future demand. For
example, our analysis suggests that in 2030 demand for green steel in Europe could be twice
as great as the available supply. Projections point to global shortages of recycled aluminum
and recycled plastic.
Such market imbalances will squeeze makers of industrial goods and consumer products that
have pledged to reduce their supply chain emissions. Companies that fail to secure adequate
supplies of scarce green materials may need to pay steep premiums, or else they will fall
short of their target commitments, potentially harming their relationships with customers,
investors, and other stakeholders. Already, growing demand has pushed the prices of some
types of recycled plastic much higher than the prices of virgin resins.
Anticipating these risks, careful players across value chains are now working to build the
capabilities and strategies needed to avoid supply disruptions in the near term and beyond. In
this article, we identify potential shortages and explain business practices that can help
companies cope with them. Three near-term actions—developing baseline insights on
emissions and pricing for inputs, defining a sourcing strategy to lower emissions over time,
and implementing sourcing plans at speed—could prove valuable as businesses prepare for
the green-materials supply crunch.
Scope 3 emissions account for 80 to 90 percent of the emissions associated with many end
products, and large shares of these emissions occur upstream in the supply chain as a result of
energy use and industrial processes. In response, companies are demanding ever greater
quantities of low-emissions inputs, from raw materials to highly engineered components. Our
recent reviews of requests for quotations from automotive OEMs suggest that more and more
are specifying renewable-electricity use, recycled-materials content, and even SBTi
commitments. However, the output of green materials isn’t keeping up with the increase in
demand—and the gap could widen as more companies switch to the low-emissions resources
they will need to meet their climate goals.
For example, our analysis suggests that demand for green steel in Europe will rise to 45
million to 50 million metric tons per year by 2030, if it increases at the pace necessary to
meet the European Union’s target of a 50 percent emissions reduction. Steelmakers have said
that they will have more than a dozen green-steel factories up and running in Europe at the
end of the decade, enough to provide about one-third of the continent’s flat-steel production
capacity. Even so, there could be a supply shortfall of more than ten million tons in 2030.
Steel is only one low-emissions resource that is headed for supply shortages in Europe.
Further analysis points to wide gaps between production and demand for recycled aluminum
and recycled plastic, partly because there may be too little aluminum and plastic waste
available to meet demand for recycled materials (Exhibit 1).
Exhibit 1
We strive to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our website. If you would
like information about this content we will be happy to work with you. Please email us
at: McKinsey_Website_Accessibility@mckinsey.com
Supply shortfalls ought to ease as more production capacity comes online, though it is not
clear how long this might take. Until then, companies that haven’t already locked in supplies
of low-emissions resources could face rising price premiums. Their dilemma will be whether
to pay those premiums—for the sake of meeting climate pledges and satisfying customer
demand—or to break their promises.
It’s still early days in the race to obtain low-emission resources and too soon for first movers’
approaches to be proven successful over the long term. Nevertheless, their actions suggest
that a high degree of ingenuity, along with extensive collaboration across value chains, may
be required to overcome supply constraints and lock in lower costs. Our experience with
these companies has highlighted what they are doing to manage the green-materials squeeze.
Their initiatives are typically concentrated in three areas.
Developing market insights to manage uncertainties. Because supply, demand, and pricing
will vary as market conditions change, leading companies have worked to model these factors
over time. Their modeling tools often include supply cost curves, supply and demand
scenarios, and pricing scenarios, along with projections for suppliers’ capacity buildouts, cost
positions, and emissions intensity. They also need to be frequently updated to keep up with a
dynamic market. Most companies will want to update their models at least every six to 12
months.
Taking a strategic, long-term approach to sourcing decisions. The unsettled outlook for
pricing, supply, regulation, and technology, among other considerations, has prompted
leading companies to devise long-term strategies for reducing carbon emissions in their
supply chains. These strategies generally integrate three components:
Building new capabilities beyond supply chain management. As the practices above
suggest, reducing supply chain emissions will be a yearslong effort for most companies, and
one that requires a host of new management capabilities. Most companies will need to invest
in analytical and strategy-setting capabilities just to institute these practices. Other
capabilities may be needed as well, such as design skills to eliminate supply chain emissions
by changing products’ material requirements, or engineering capabilities required to develop
product-as-a-service business models.
To transform a business in these ways will take time, but companies cannot afford to delay
action. The green-materials shortage has begun, and leading businesses are preparing for it.
Below, we describe three near-term actions that companies can take to get ready.
Step 1: Develop baseline insights on emissions, supply, demand, and pricing for every
material input
To plan for supply chain decarbonization, companies should first understand both the
emissions generated during the manufacturing of all the components and materials they now
procure and their exposures to supply, demand, and price volatility for these inputs.
Supply chain emissions and risk exposures can vary greatly among companies, as well as
among the goods sourced by any given business. The typical automotive OEM, for example,
procures a broad array of components and materials. Of these, a few ordinarily account for a
large majority of supply chain emissions (Exhibit 2). This diversity allows OEMs to focus
first on the most economical ways of abating upstream emissions. For example, if switching
to recycled ABS,2 a type of plastic, turns out to be a more cost-effective way to eliminate
emissions than switching to carbon-free copper, a company can seek out green materials
accordingly, especially in the near term.
Exhibit 2
We strive to provide individuals with disabilities equal access to our website. If you would
like information about this content we will be happy to work with you. Please email us
at: McKinsey_Website_Accessibility@mckinsey.com
On the other hand, many automotive suppliers find that most of their supply chain emissions
result from a single raw material. For some suppliers of mechanical components, steel
accounts for more than 80 percent of their embedded emissions. Suppliers of plastic parts
might find that more than 90 percent of their upstream emissions result from their purchases
of plastic granulate. Companies such as these have fewer options for decarbonizing and face
far more volatile costs.
Step 2: Chart a sourcing strategy to cut emissions over multiple time frames
We believe the shift to zero-emissions materials will play out over three time frames: the next
12 months, the two or three years after that, and the ensuing period out to ten years from now.
In the nearest time frame, companies can achieve significant reductions of supply chain
emissions—up to 40 percent for many materials—through such measures as using more
secondary material and changing to suppliers that source renewable energy.
Over the next two horizons, continued decarbonization will depend on the pace of such
developments as commercialization of new low-carbon materials, capital investment by
suppliers, and innovation for hard-to-abate materials. Production of some low-carbon
supplies, such as electric-vehicle (EV) batteries and chemically recycled plastics, is being
scaled up. Other supplies, such as inert-anode aluminum, will take longer to reach the market.
Companies should ascertain when they might be able to procure low-carbon materials that are
not yet available in mass quantities and begin planning now for how they will secure their
share.
A company may need new purchasing models for some supplies—especially if it lacks the
buying power to compel suppliers to decarbonize. To encourage investment in R&D or
production capacity, competitors in some industries may choose to form “buyer’s clubs” that
agree to buy large quantities of low-carbon materials.
Companies will also need to gauge the progress of their decarbonization efforts by tracking
and tracing emissions throughout the supply chain. Few have mastered this new skill. Fewer
still have mapped their supply chain emissions using primary data—in part because suppliers
rarely collect this data themselves. Sourcing teams may need to help suppliers install
hardware and software to generate the emissions data they want.
And while a good portion of supply chain emissions can be reduced with near-term action, C-
suite leaders should also prepare to invest now in longer-term solutions. Some companies are
financing innovation and production-capacity increases for the low-emissions materials they
require. Mercedes-Benz and Scania, for example, have each acquired equity stakes in H2
Green Steel, a Swedish start-up that is constructing both a green-steel plant and a green-
hydrogen plant that will produce the fuel needed for steelmaking. Similarly, BMW
announced an investment in Boston Metal, a US-based green-steel start-up.
When companies establish targets for reducing Scope 3 emissions, they also accept the task
of decarbonizing their supply chains. This task comes with practical challenges, but
businesses that get it right stand to gain market share and improve their margins. By taking
near-term action to develop insights on emissions and market dynamics, plan sourcing
strategies, and create capabilities, they can achieve immediate emissions reductions and
sustain progress toward longer-term goals.
Sustainable Procurement
Statistics — 21 Key Figures of
2024
Table of content
21 Key Figures for 2024
What Does It Mean?
Automation
Net-Zero Commitments by Companies
Shortages and Inflation
Conclusion
Frequently asked questions
Last updated: 29-12-2023 at 02:20
Key take-aways
Sustainable practices in procurement processes are increasing as
demand for sustainability, especially with global companies arise.
Companies and organizations that adhere to sustainable ethics
and practices have increasing brand value compared to those that
do not.
Global consumers purchase sustainable products or items that
are outsourced sustainably more in comparison to those that are
not.
Sustainable procurement statistics is a topic that many
procurement professionals should know. Of course, this subject is
timely as many companies continue to commit to a sustainable
process of their company.
This article will guide you through the latest sustainable
procurement statistics available in 2024. We will discuss some
topics that will enable companies to achieve sustainability in
their procurement
After reading this article, you will have a great insight into
sustainable procurement statistics. Thus, allowing you to know
what are the things that will make the shift to sustainability
possible.
Automation in Sustainable
Procurement
Shifting from a sustainable procurement means integrating new
technologies that consume less energy to make the procurement
processes efficient while considering the health of the environment and
society.
Through automation, businesses can go on a paperless process.
According to a study, businesses produce 21 million tons of paper
waste each year. Thus, automation saves paper and makes it easier for
everyone to access information through their system.
Automation can also make manufacturers reduce their energy
consumption. Automation can decrease heating requirements and
reduce cycle times. Additionally, it can lower the amount of energy that
is needed for operation. Thus, lowering the carbon emissions of
manufacturing companies by using less energy.
Net-Zero Commitments by
Companies
Multinational companies like Unilever have committed to a net-zero
operation. Through Unilever’s action plan, it has set a clear pathway to
have zero emissions in its operation by 2030 and net zero emissions
across its value chain by 2039.
Although many multinational companies like Unilever are switching to a
sustainable procurement and supply chain, many small to midsize
companies are just starting to hear about sustainability.
The growing alliance of countries, cities, companies and other
institutions are pledging to get to net-zero emissions. More than 70
countries, which includes the largest polluters — the United States,
China, and European Union — have a zero net target that covers about
79% of global emissions.
According to Antonino Guterres, the United Nations Secretary-General,
they need commitments that will deliver a reduction of emissions by
45% by 2030 to reach net zero emissions by mid-century.
RESOURCES:
SAP BNEF
SAS Marketsplash
Bloomberg Gartner
Research AI Multiple
CIPS
United Nations
Harvard Scholar
Green Business Bureau Maryville
However, one thing has not changed from our 2019 Barometer: Ethical
purpose remains the primary motivator for suppliers choosing to engage in
sustainability. This is an encouraging metric that signals suppliers are
building the company-wide foundation and buy-in needed to develop
comprehensive sustainable procurement programs that enable close
collaboration with buyers.
Conclusion
The survey and in-depth interviews conducted as part of this year’s
Barometer highlight how sustainable procurement has contributed to
greater supply chain resilience in the face of unprecedented disruption and
benefited suppliers in a multitude of other ways. As sustainable
procurement increasingly becomes the norm for large and mid-size buying
companies – fuelled by greater ambition around climate action and an
evolving regulatory landscape – suppliers will be called upon to
implement comprehensive sustainability practices and provide greater
supply chain transparency.
Sustainable Procurement
Barometer 2021
JULY 29, 2021
Only participants will receive the study output customized with your
responses alongside the benchmarks
**** End Update. Continue reading for highlights on the 2021 edition
****
2021 Report: From Resilience to Opportunity - Sustainability
Pays Off Through the Crisis and Beyond
Despite the fears that it would negatively impact sustainability progress,
the COVID-19 pandemic has consolidated corporate sustainability goals at
the top of the executive agenda. Sustainable Procurement Barometer 2021,
developed jointly by EcoVadis and the Value Chain Innovation Initiative
at Stanford Graduate School of Business, provides critical insights into the
growing recognition that sustainable procurement is fundamental to
building resilience throughout organizations and supply chains, mitigating
risk and driving results.
$23T reduced annual global economic output worldwide because of climate change.
35% revenue losses due to climate-related disruptions to specialty supply chains, well-prepared
players only risk ~5% revenue losses.
$970B in extra costs due to factors incl. hotter temperatures, chaotic weather, and pricing of
greenhouse gas emissions.
With sustainable procurement 5-10% costs down,
57% of consumers are willing to change their purchasing habits to help reduce negative
environmental impact. Sustainability as #1 concern amongst Millennial and Gen Z jobseekers.
Procurement has a significant impact as 2/3 of a company’s ESG footprint lies with their
suppliers.
Comply with increasing regulations such as Extended Producer Responsibility or ban on plastics.
Receive sustainability targeted Investments ,10-20% faster growth and higher valuation.
Following sustainability factors in the procurement and supply chain can support your organization to
achieve the Sustainability Objective and improve corporate value.
1. Transitioning from “Low to No” carbon across your suppliers and procurement spend.
Carbon footprint of materials at product level
Carbon performance of suppliers
Supplier-level certifications and data tracking (i.e., renewable energy usage)
Water-emission at product level
2. Contribute to a zero-waste world by incorporating resilience and circularity into your
procurement processes and supply chains.
Percentage of recyclable materials
Percentage of recycled materials
Percentage of bio-based plastic
Tracking and quantifying reusability
Asset transfer for internal use
3. Ensure zero incidents, accidents and harm to communities, people, and the environment.
Guarantee diversity and fair working conditions.
Supplier ownership, e.g., woman-owned, veteran-owned, minority-owned etc.
Measures of diversity in management
Social impact of the enterprise
Human-right violations in the supply chain
How to promote sustainability in the Procurement processes and how to enable it in your
organization?
Why Sustainable
Procurement Makes
Good Business Sense
Sustainable procurement refers to a way of doing business that
safeguards the environment for future generations. It’s more than
just a trend in the business world. It’s an integral part of any
company seeking Net Zero Business Champion status and wants
to succeed in the long term.