Mock Paper 1 Paper 2 Mark Scheme Higher
Mock Paper 1 Paper 2 Mark Scheme Higher
Mock Paper 1 Paper 2 Mark Scheme Higher
Edexcel and BTEC qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest
awarding body. We provide a wide range of qualifications including academic,
vocational, occupational and specific programmes for employers. For further
information visit our qualifications websites at www.edexcel.com or
www.btec.co.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details
on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus.
Pearson aspires to be the world’s leading learning company. Our aim is to help
everyone progress in their lives through education. We believe in every kind of
learning, for all kinds of people, wherever they are in the world. We’ve been involved
in education for over 150 years, and by working across 70 countries, in 100
languages, we have built an international reputation for our commitment to high
standards and raising achievement through innovation in education. Find out more
about how we can help you and your students at: www.pearson.com/uk
Publications Code
All the material in this publication is copyright
© Pearson Education Ltd 2014
General marking guidance
These notes offer general guidance, but the specific notes for examiners appertaining to individual questions take precedence.
1 All candidates must receive the same treatment. Examiners must mark the last candidate in exactly the same way as they mark
the first.
Where some judgement is required, mark schemes will provide the principles by which marks will be awarded;
exemplification/indicative content will not be exhaustive. When examiners are in doubt regarding the application of the mark
scheme to a candidate’s response, the response should be sent to review.
2 All the marks on the mark scheme are designed to be awarded; mark schemes should be applied positively. Examiners should also
be prepared to award zero marks if the candidate’s response is not worthy of credit according to the mark scheme. If there is a
wrong answer (or no answer) indicated on the answer line always check the working in the body of the script (and on any
diagrams), and award any marks appropriate from the mark scheme.
Questions where working is not required: In general, the correct answer should be given full marks.
Questions that specifically require working: In general, candidates who do not show working on this type of question will get
no marks – full details will be given in the mark scheme for each individual question.
4 Choice of method
If there is a choice of methods shown, mark the method that leads to the answer given on the answer line.
If no answer appears on the answer line then mark both methods as far as they are identical and award these marks.
5 Incorrect method
If it is clear from the working that the “correct” answer has been obtained from incorrect working, award 0 marks. Send the
response to review for your Team Leader to check.
6 Follow through marks
Follow through marks which involve a single stage calculation can be awarded without working as you can check the answer, but if
ambiguous do not award.
Follow through marks which involve more than one stage of calculation can only be awarded on sight of the relevant working,
even if it appears obvious that there is only one way you could get the answer given.
8 Probability
Probability answers must be given as a fraction, percentage or decimal. If a candidate gives a decimal equivalent to a probability,
this should be written to at least 2 decimal places (unless tenths).
Incorrect notation should lose the accuracy marks, but be awarded any implied method marks.
If a probability answer is given on the answer line using both incorrect and correct notation, award the marks.
If a probability fraction is given then cancelled incorrectly, ignore the incorrectly cancelled answer.
9 Linear equations
Unless indicated otherwise in the mark scheme, full marks can be gained if the solution alone is given on the answer line, or
otherwise unambiguously identified in working (without contradiction elsewhere). Where the correct solution only is shown
substituted, but not identified as the solution, the accuracy mark is lost but any method marks can be awarded (embedded
answers).
10 Range of answers
Unless otherwise stated, when an answer is given as a range (e.g 3.5 – 4.2) then this is inclusive of the end points (e.g 3.5, 4.2)
and all numbers within the range.
Guidance on the use of abbreviations within this mark scheme
P process mark awarded for a correct process as part of a problem solving question
C communication mark
oe or equivalent
sc special case
indep independent
(b) 4 1 4 4
60 60 60
B1 oe or ft Venn diagram for
(d) Data out of 1 C1 explanation, e.g. extrapolation, data out of range, number of
range children will be negative
7 (a) UK £98, USA £94.40, USA 3 P1 process to find price to compare for USA,
Germany £102.19 with reasons e.g. 134.99 ÷ 1.43 (= 94.40)
UK $140.14, USA $134.99 P1 process to find price to compare for Germany,
Germany $146.14 e.g. 139.99 × 0.73 (= 102.19)
UK €134.25, USA €129.31 A1 correct conclusion with correct figures in consistent currencies to
Germany €139.99 compare e.g. (£)94.40, (£)102.19, (£)98
e.g. 24 : 15 and 15 : 20
P1 unsimplified ratio
A1 cao
(b) 5.96 × 10−8 2 M1 (2.8 ÷ 4.7) × 10−2−5 or 0.595…× 10−7 or 5.95…× 10−8 or
0.0000000596
A1 cao
11 (a) 76.0 3 h
d
P1 for tan x =
4d
d
P1 for tan−1 (= 75.963..)
A1 75.9 − 76
Mock Paper 1MA1: 2H
13 (i) 150 3 8 30 8
40 8 30
P1 or or
8 30 8 40 30×40
40 n 30 n 8
P1 = or = or
A1 cao
(ii) Explanation 1 C1 e.g. if tags fell off Alex will have over-estimated the number of
ducks.
2
5
P1 process to find y coordinate 7 + × 5 (= 9)
2
5
or x coordinate − 9 + × 20 (= −1)
−1
1
4
P1 method to find gradient of line L (= −4)
M1 substitution of found values for x, y and m into equation for
straight line
A1 y = – 4x + 5
20 45 4 B1 p = 5
M1 405 = 5q4
4
√ 81
M1 q = (=3)
A1 cao
21 5 1
⃗
BA ⃗
YA 2
M1 = a – 3b or = (a – 3b)
Mock Paper 1MA1: 2H
1 1
⃗
XY 2 ⃗
YZ 2
M1 =b+ (a – 3b) or =a+ (a – 3b) or
⃗
XZ
= 2a – 2b
1 1
⃗
XY 2 ⃗
YZ 2 ⃗
XZ
M1 two of =b+ (a – 3b) or =a+ (a – 3b) or
= 2a – 2b
M1 simplification to enable comparison of 2 of
⃗
XY ⃗
XZ ⃗
YZ
, and
1 3
2 2
e.g. 2 of (a – b) , (a – b) and 2(a – b)
⃗
XY ⃗
XZ ⃗
YZ
C1 completes proof with reference to 2 of , and parallel
and a common point