Env Law
Env Law
Env Law
1. By the 42nd Amendment Act, Article 48A was added as a part of the
Directive Principles of State Policy which stated that it was the
state’s responsibility to make efforts in order to “protect and
improve the environment, and to safeguard the forests and wildlife
of the country.”
2. Article 51A(g) declares that it is the fundamental duty of each and
every citizen of the country to “protect and improve the natural
environment including the forests, lakes, rivers, and wildlife and to
have compassion for living creatures.”
3. Our judiciary has outlined in a number of judgments that Article 21,
which guarantees the right to life and dignity, also encompasses the
right to live in a healthy and safe environment. In the case
of Subhash Kumar v. the State of Bihar, it was observed that the
right to get pollution-free water and air is a fundamental right under
Article 21.
4. Article 253 of the Indian Constitution empowers the Parliament to
bring any legislation to give effect to any international treaty,
agreement, convention, or decision taken at a conference. It was
with the help of Article 253 that the Indian Parliament enacted the
Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 to give effect to the decisions
taken at the UN Conference on the Human Environment held in
Stockholm in 1972.
Section 2 of the Act defined various terms used in its provisions. These
definitions are as follows:
1. The person taking the sample must serve a notice of his intention to
take the sample to the person in charge of the place.
2. The sample must be taken in the presence of the person in charge
or his agent.
3. The sample must be placed in a container or containers, which shall
be marked and sealed. Thereafter, it shall be signed by both the
person taking the sample and the person in charge or his agent.
4. The container then must be sent to the laboratory established under
Section 12.
5. In case the person in charge or his agent wilfully absents himself or
refuses to sign the containers, the containers must be sealed,
marked, and signed by the person taking the sample and must be
sent to the laboratory. The government analyst must be informed in
writing about the wilful absence or refusal to sign.
Any analysis taken without following the procedure prescribed would not be
admissible as valid evidence in any legal proceedings.
Conclusion
Post the Stockholm Conference and the Oleum gas leak case, the concern for
the environment has magnified. The provisions of the Environment
(Protection) Act, 1986 mark a positive step towards environment protection
and improvement. It has stipulated some stringent regulations for the
prevention, control, and abatement of environment pollution. The central
government has been given a wide scope of powers to frame rules and
appoint authorities to further the purposes of this Act. Additionally, the Act
has facilitated the coming of several notifications for environment protection
which have introduced new protective principles like the Environment Impact
Assessment. It has also empowered the citizens to play a proactive role in
environment protection by calling out the pollution-causing industries under
EPA which has led to a string of environmentally sound judicial decisions.
However, there are still some lacunas present in the Act that need to be filled
with subsequent amendments to update the Act with changing times.