Quality Function Deployment Intro
Quality Function Deployment Intro
E
Correlations
C
Response to Customer Needs
B
Customer Rating - Us
Planning Matrix
Customer Rating Comp 1 Customer Rating Comp 2
A
Customer Needs and Benefits
D
Relationship Matrix
Impact of Response on Customer Needs and Benefits
Customer Rating
Improvement Ratio
Importance Weight
Planned Level
Ranking factor
Relative weight
Innovation Process Management Northcroft Croft Close Corfe Mullen Wimborne Dorset BH21 3JE 44 (0) 1202 699870
Graphs
Contents
1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 3 2 Quality Function Deployment a definition ............................................................................. 3 3 The objectives of Quality Function Deployment.................................................................... 4 3.1 Focus on the customer ............................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Reduce time-to-market ............................................................................................................. 4 3.3 Reduce cost ............................................................................................................................. 5 3.4 Manage information.................................................................................................................. 5 3.5 Improve marketing and development collaboration.................................................................. 5 3.6 Organisational learning ............................................................................................................ 6 4 Modern Quality Systems .......................................................................................................... 6 5 Types of Requirements ............................................................................................................ 6 6 Application area of QFD ........................................................................................................... 7 7 Preparing for QFD .................................................................................................................... 7 7.1 Management assignment ......................................................................................................... 7 7.2 Organising for QFD .................................................................................................................. 7 7.3 QFD Project start-up................................................................................................................. 8 7.4 Planning the QFD-project ......................................................................................................... 9 7.5 Establish a routine of briefings and debriefings for team meetings .......................................... 9 8 Building the House of Quality ................................................................................................. 10 Step 1: List the Customer Requirements ................................................................................. 11 Step 2: Rate / Rank each attribute................................................................................................ 13 Step 3: Benchmark the performance of the current product ......................................................... 13 Step 4: Identify and rank improvement objectives ........................................................................ 14 Step 5: Generate the list of design parameters ............................................................................ 15 Step 6: The QFD interaction matrix .............................................................................................. 16 Step 7: Benchmark the technical performance of the current product.......................................... 18 Step 8: Determine the technical target for the new product .......................................................... 19 Step 9: Identify supporting and conflicting design parameters ..................................................... 20 Step 10: Beyond the house of quality ........................................................................................... 21
1 Introduction
Quality Function Deployment (QFD) began more than twenty years ago in Japan as a quality system focused on delivering products and services that satisfy customers. To efficiently deliver value to customers, it is necessary to listen to the "voice" of the customer throughout the product or service development process. The late Dr. Shigeru Mizimo, Dr. Yoji Akao, and other quality experts in Japan developed the tools and techniques of QFD and organised them into a comprehensive system to assure quality and customer satisfaction in new products and services. Since 1983, companies have discovered this powerful approach and are using it with cross-functional teams and concurrent engineering to improve their products and services, as well as the design and development process itself.
Vision
Horizontal
Horizontal
QFD
Integration
QFD
Integration
Individual Function
Departments
Many new products and Services fail because of a lack of customer focus QFD helps the organisation to focus on the customer. It provides a careful routine to incorporate both customer and market (competition) perspectives into the conceptualisation phase of the innovation process. QFD forces you to aim your innovation efforts at real customers instead of an impersonal market. Furthermore, the QFD approach facilitates a shared interpretation of customer needs (Whats) within the project team, and provides a process to translate these needs into measurable requirements (Hows).
False assessments of technical feasibility are reflected in the number and scope of design changes we have to make after design release. These design changes directly affect the possibility of reaching our time-to-market targets. Often, they occur because the concept of the new product was not studied with enough critical sense. Due to the sequential structure of our product innovation process, we tend to postpone decisions on issues like manufacturability to later phases, when they may present us with problems that have a much greater impact. What we should do is take the lead in the prevention of problems. This can be achieved in two ways: by managing the level of uncertainty and managing the scope of change. QFD supports both. It is a multidisciplinary team approach that brings together all available knowledge and pinpoints the unknown. QFD helps you select those and only those technical objectives that will maximise customer benefit, given particular time and cost windows.
QFD supports the identification of the product characteristics that the customer thinks are less important. High performances with respect to these characteristics, compared to those of competing products, provide opportunities for cost reduction.
Many product concepts suffer from an information overload. In most cases, the required knowledge is available, but it is difficult to distinguish between relevant and irrelevant pieces of information, data, and opinions, and to cluster these into a manageable format. Information overload conceals the information that you do not have. QFD activates the knowledge that is available in the organisation and helps you structure all relevant information and experiences.
To a large extent, product innovation productivity is determined by the way in which marketing and development people work together in the initial phases of the product innovation process. Often, the level of this collaboration leaves room for improvement. We have seen too many cases in which either marketing defines the new products specifications and has development try to realise them, or development creates all kinds of options from which marketing makes a selection for the new product. Both approaches involve a significant loss of development effort. QFD provides a format for both marketing and the development team to contribute and share their knowledge. QFD serves as a communication aid between these two perspectives on the new product or service.
Sometimes product innovation is a shot in the dark. In the event of failure, this trial-and-error approach is so loaded with emotions, that it cannot be used as a stepping stone for learning. In such cases, it is impossible to reveal the incorrect assumptions that have ruled the design-decision-making process. Assumptions have not been formulated explicitly. Therefore, we should periodically check the assumptions from which we conceptualise our new products. In QFD, assumptions about customer preferences and design decisions are well documented. Subsequent QFD application provides a highly valuable set of verified assumptions about customer requirements and how they relate to technical issues. As such, QFD lays a basis for organisational learning.
5 Types of Requirements
To satisfy customers, we must understand how meeting their requirements effects satisfaction. There are three types of customer requirements to consider
Exciting Quality
Innovative Features: Attributes of the product that create delight - but cause no dissatisfaction when not provided.
Performance Needs Basic Features: Attributes of the product that do not generate positive satisfaction but cause negative reaction when not provided.
Competitive Features: Attributes of the product that cause increasing satisfaction the more they are provided.
Expected Quality
The team leader serves as a mediator between management and the team members. The team leader is preferably a product manager and/or senior product engineer. The team leaders main responsibility is to keep the team going within the scope and time frames that have been set.
The QFD facilitator could be anyone who is familiar with QFD methodology. He should know the main steps of the process and be skilled in the application of QFD tools. It is the responsibility of the QFD facilitator to ensure that the exercise is completed in the most efficient manner.
The QFD facilitator: Explains the QFD method, so all QFD team members know what is expected; Ensures that a consensus is reached in good time; Ensures co-operation inside and outside of the sessions.
In general, the role of the facilitator is to improve communication, teamwork, and documentation. The facilitator needs to maintain a close relationship with the team leader. Facilitation of QFD in a pilot application could be provided by an external consultant.
Together with the project leader, management should decide who should be on the team to build the initial House of Quality. The team will generally consist of representatives from product management, consumer/customer research, product development and manufacturing. The teams should preferably consist of approximately five to seven people. Depending on the object and scope of the study, the composition of the team may diverge from this general set-up. With the downward transfer of the objects of study, the team members will change.
2. The initial QFD team meeting The initial QFD team meeting is to accomplish two things: first to learn the scope of the project; and second, to learn the main structure of the QFD process.
First of all, the scope of the project must be clearly defined, understood and agreed upon by all team members. This helps to avoid the question Why are we here?, which will inevitably arise whenever the scope is poorly understood. Understanding the scope as well as management expectations helps the team members establish priorities. Before embarking on the QFD study, the team members should reach agreement on such issues as: Key questions: which products are we going to improve? Do we focus on a specific characteristic of the product? For what market or segment [target group(s)] are we aiming and who, in fact, do we consider as our customers? What are the planning and time frames of the project? How does the QFD study fit into product planning? Which competing products will be used as a reference for product evaluation?
During the initial team meeting, the facilitator needs to ensure that everyone understands the structure of the QFD process. Thus, the team will get an idea of the amount of effort and information that will be
necessary to complete the task. The results of this meeting should be communicated to and agreed upon by management.
A QFD project will require several meetings, which are used to co-ordinate activities and update matrices and charts. As part of the project, team members will also spend time working on individual assignments. Reporting should focus on what information has been used, what information is needed, and difficulties in getting that information. The reporting structure will depend on the frequency of the team meetings and the group dynamics. Experience shows that if the team leader reports to the manager on a monthly basis, there will be enough time to measure progress. Finally, the manager needs to show continuing support for the team after the project has started. The manager should inform all other managers of the QFD project, its scope, its objectives, and the names of the team members. This helps to eliminate problems when team members are asked to do more than they can. Remember that a QFD experiment is not a part of just another product development project, but it is an attempt to improve the way in which you develop products.
of
Be nc hm a
Vo
Cu st o
C
Response to Customer Needs
Im
Planning Matrix
Improvement Ratio Importance Weight Ranking factor Relative weight Graphs
ic e
Int ern al E
xpe rts
Correlations
B
Customer Rating Comp 1 Customer Rating - Us
Design Outputs
Product renewal involves the implementation of a change of product and process characteristics on the basis of customer requirements. Therefore, these customer requirements need to be translated downstream into design requirements and furthermore into components, process and manufacturing requirements. QFD provides the general means to make these downstream translations. We have found that the QFD process is most beneficial in the first phase (translating customer requirements into design requirements). Therefore, in this manual we will describe the steps that constitute the QFD process in this initial phase. In terms of method, the application of QFD for the other translations is almost identical. We have already presented the required preconditions for a successful QFD application: the scope of the study should be clear. Translation of customer requirements into design requirements is not a one-to-one translation, however. One customer requirement can be related to more than one design requirement, and a design requirement can influence several customer requirements. QFD therefore uses a matrix. This matrix of QFD is called the House of Quality.
Planned Level
Relationship Matrix
Customer Rating
m eA r
po rta nc e
E
rki ng
10
First of all, the QFD team asks itself: Who is the customer? If we do not know the customer, we do not know his wishes and requirements. This question often gives rise to heated discussions, due to the fact that there are various perspectives from which this question can be answered. It is of vital importance to the QFD process that a consensus is reached within the QFD team about the kind of customer to focus on. If we cannot agree on the target customer, this discussion will be repeated regularly, thus causing team member demotivation and reduced team productivity. We need to have a clear customer profile. A good description includes the end-users, but could also include a profile of the persons who buy the product and perhaps the dealer who influences the potential buyer in his/her purchase decision. Even a Consumers Association could have a place in this description, because they provide potential buyers with overviews of the results of product evaluations.
Affinity Relationships
Tree
E
Graphs
C D
Suppose that we know our customer and ask him about his requirements for the product. The wishes and requirements he will then give us, we call expressed requirements. The more of these requirements he will find fulfilled in our new product, the more he will feel inclined to buy it. Apart from these expressed requirements, we must also consider the customers implicit requirements. These are the requirements which are not expressed by the customer, but which he assumes to be present. Implicit requirements refer
11
to the dissatisfiers in products (i.e. safety and reliability). We must generate these requirements ourselves. Finally, the attraction requirements are neither expressed nor expected by the customer, but when he notices them, he will be surprised and excited. Attraction requirements refer to the satisfiers in a product. These requirements are of the utmost importance in attracting the attention of customers and getting the product sold.
12
E
Graphs
C D
Customers choose between products of different brands. Therefore, it is important to know the strong and weak points of our product in relation to the products of our most important competitors. A product improvement project should start by making this comparison from a customer point of view. For this comparison, we select the competing products that we want to challenge with our new product (same market segment). In fact, this evaluation will provide useful input data for the definition of the new product. Competitive benchmarking is a built-in step within the QFD process. Made within the project team, this comparison will be a matter of collective judgement. Practical experience shows that a consensus of opinion on the best and the worst is fairly easy to attain, due to the use of customer language for the customer requirements. Problems could arise when judging items like Has an attractive appearance and Must radiate quality, because there you may have to deal with the individual tastes of the team members. Keep in mind that you should be looking through the customers eyes. If time allows, you could also have this analysis performed by a customer research agency. This should be planned in advance, because otherwise the group process could suffer from an unacceptable delay.
13
E
Graphs
C D
Having reached this step, you have gathered a lot of information. We will use this information to establish the improvement objectives for the new product. The data that result from competitive benchmarking provide an insight into the advantages and disadvantages of the current product as seen through the customers eyes. Furthermore, the importance ratings weight each item on the customer requirements list. To identify the objectives for improvement you could apply the following rules of thumb: With respect to the high importance items you should be the best; if this performance level has already been attained, those items could be emphasised as unique selling points; With the medium importance items you should match the competitors performance; The low importance items, with respect to which the current product performs best, provide opportunities for cost reduction.
14
E
Graphs
C D
Now that the improvement objectives and the customer requirement rankings have been established, they will be translated into technical terms. This translation lies at the heart of the QFD methodology and will be explained in the following paragraphs. The design requirements result from the translation of customer requirements into technical specifications. At the end of the QFD analysis, each design requirement will be represented by the target value of a design criterion, or parameter. For this, however, first, we need to generate the list of design parameters. Together, the design requirements reflect the technical characteristics of the new product. The list of design parameters itself should meet five methodological requirement: 1. Validity the design parameters reflect a valid measurement of customer requirements; 2. Completeness together, the parameters fully represent all customer requirements; 3. Operationality the design parameters refer to concrete observable characteristics (with or without a measuring instrument). The method of measurement must be determined. 4. Non-redundancy technical characteristics of the products are represented only once in this list of design parameters. 5. Accessibility the list of design parameters is useful within the given time and cost frames of the project. It will always be possible to improve the list (scientifically), but you should ask yourself whether additional information gathering would pay off in the project. In QFD, the list of design parameters is called the HOWs list. Examples of design parameters are: dimensions, weight, frequency response, number of handles, maximum output power, position of mains switch. There are two ways to generate this list of technical specification parameters: Use the technical specification data of the current product; Identify representations that express customer requirements as measurable values.
15
E
Graphs
C D
Customer requirements are expressed in customer language. In order to make them suitable for product design and product development, it is necessary to translate these requirements into technical requirements. The problem is that it is not a one-to-one translation. A customer requirement can relate to several design parameters, and a design parameter can relate to more customer requirements than one. QFD therefore uses the format of a matrix, in which all interactions between customer requirements and design parameters can be identified. The interactions between customer requirements and design parameters vary in intensity. Therefore, QFD uses several degrees of interaction, each of which is represented by an interaction score. For instance: high interaction (=9), medium interaction (=3), low interaction (=1) and no interaction (= blank). To improve the clarity of the matrix, it is helpful to use symbols that represent the degree of interaction. Once all relationships have been identified and characterised, this matrix becomes an instrument for translating the project objectives from step 4 into a priority-list of the design parameters. It provides an answer to the question: What are the design parameters on which we should focus the product development effort? Simple calculation methods could be applied to reveal the priorities (see figure 5.8). For instance: 1. To determine the cell scores, multiply the interaction scores (of each cell) by the weight that was assigned to the respective customer requirements; 2. Add up the cell scores for each design parameter (weighted sum or column scores); 3. Determine the ranking of design parameters. Now we know the priority of each design parameter.
16
Technical Response
= 9 Strong Relationship
Diameter of Head
Strength of Join
Diameter of Pin
Sharpness of Pin
Customer Wants Easy to push into pin board Pin does not bend Feels safe when pressure applied Safe to handle
5 3 4 3
Customer Importance
Technical Response
Diameter of Head
Customer Wants Easy to push into pin board Pin does not bend Feels safe when pressure applied Safe to handle Importance Weight Relative Importance
5 3 4 3
15
5 9 27 4
Strength of Join
31 3
Diameter of Pin
45 9 4 27 85 1
12 27 54 2
4 3 21 4
Sharpness of Pin
17
E
Graphs
C D
It is quite common to perform competitors analysis on technical aspects. It is of course easier to compare figures and data than impressions and opinions. Most of the values of the design parameters can be expressed in measurable data:
: : : :
The values of other design parameters (i.e. quality requirements) must be determined by conducting (standardised) tests: Drop test Insulation : : UAN-D1534 IEC 65
Some of the design parameters will be on a nominal scale; then we use words to indicate the category: Front material Finishing : : PVC High gloss
A comparison of the technical performance of our product with the performances of the products of our main competitors reveals our technical position (i.e. in terms of design parameters) with respect to the competition. Furthermore, this kind of technical benchmarking provides a check for the consistency of the interaction matrix (step 6) and the competitive benchmarking data (step 3). For instance, a high score for customer requirement X should be reflected in a high score for the design parameters that have a high
18
interaction with customer requirement X. In this way, technical benchmarking helps you calibrate your House of Quality.
E
Graphs
C D
At this stage we have, in fact, all the materials needed to determine the target specification (parameter values) for a new design: We know the customer requirements and the importance of the requirements; We know the strong and weak points of our products compared with those of our most important competitors; We know the interactions of the customer requirements and the design parameters; Through these interactions we know which design parameter values we must improve in order to overcome the weak points in our products with respect to important customer requirements; We know the technical characteristics of our current and competing products in terms of design parameters; We know the interdependencies of the design parameters.
So now we are able to determine technical target values for the new product. Together, these target values will make up the design specification for the new product. Now that the target specifications for the new product have been established, they can be deployed, from the selection and architecture of functions to the characteristics of components and processes. The design targets that are not feasible yet can be used as input for advanced development projects for future generations of the product. In this way, QFD also helps to direct advanced development or even research from a customer perspective.
19
E
Graphs
C D
In the attic of the House of Quality you can explore the interdependence of the design parameters. While improving the values of the design parameters, you will find that some design parameters are conflicting. Designing products means dealing in trade-offs. For example, the audio output power of a portable radio must be as high as possible. However, the power consumption must be as low as possible. Increasing the output power will most likely increase the power consumption. In such a case, we must find the right valance between these parameter settings. To determine this balance, the customer requirement priority rankings should be taken into account.
20
C D
F
Hows
HOQ Hows
CTQs Hows
Matrix 1 Technical Performance Measures
Hows
2. Hows Priorities
Vo ice
Whats
House of Quality
Matrix 2
Hows Priorities
Components Characteristics
Hows
HOQ Hows
Matrix 3
Target Cost
Hows
Inputs to HOQ from: Customer Research Product Management Product Development Marketing
For the current product development project, QFD supports the co-ordination of development assignments for specialised development groups. As such, QFD serves as an organiser of product innovation projects. The most valuable assets of QFD application lie in the: Coherence and consistency of development assignments, facilitating concurrent engineering and development;
Hows
21
Concreteness of development assignments that are meaningful to each development group, because they will be stated in their own language; Fine-tuning of improvement efforts. The project will only claim development resources that will have a direct impact on customer satisfaction.
Furthermore, in applying QFD you could use several houses to include the voice of the customer into downstream development processes. Design attributes are engineering measures of product performance. For example, a computer customer might state that he (she) needs something, which makes it easy to read what Im working on. One solution is to provide computer customers with monitors for viewing their work. Design attributes for the monitor might include the measured values for the illumination of alphanumeric characters, for character resolution, for legibility judged at a distance of 50 centimetres (on an optometric scale) etc. The second house of QFD links these design attributes to the kind of action the company can take. For example, a product-development team might change the product features of the monitor. The productdevelopment team could modify the design attribute of legibility at 50 centimetres (as measured on an optometric scale) by changing the number of pixels, the size of the screen, the intensity of the pixels or the refreshment rate. Changing or replacing monitor screen material also affects the design attributes. A more radical step might be to eliminate the monitor altogether and provide a system which projects the work onto a wall or onto very small stereoscopic screens which the user wears as goggles. The third house of QFD could link action to implementation decisions in areas like manufacturing process operations. For example, the third house might be used to identify the manufacturing procedures that produce the material selected for the monitors screen. The final house of QFD in this example links implementation (manufacturing process operations) to production planning. Finally, substantial benefits from QFD come from re-using matrices. The results of a QFD study will be very useful in the definition and development of the next generation of the product and will have a significant spin-off for related products.
22