Writing A Literature Review
Writing A Literature Review
Writing A Literature Review
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic
and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis). The lit
review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of
literature such as novels and plays). When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,”
we are talking about the research (scholarship) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the
research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
An introductory paragraph that explains what your working topic and thesis is
A forecast of key topics or texts that will appear in the review
Potentially, a description of how you found sources and how you analyzed them
for inclusion and discussion in the review (more often found in published,
standalone literature reviews than in lit review sections in an article or research
paper)
Body:
Summarize and synthesize: Give an overview of the main points of each source
and combine them into a coherent whole
Analyze and interpret: Don’t just paraphrase other researchers – add your own
interpretations where possible, discussing the significance of findings in relation
to the literature as a whole
Critically Evaluate: Mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources
Write in well-structured paragraphs: Use transition words and topic sentence to
draw connections, comparisons, and contrasts.
Conclusion:
Summarize the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize
their significance
Connect it back to your primary research question
WHAT ARE SOME STRATEGIES OR TIPS I CAN USE WHILE WRITING MY LIT
REVIEW?
Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are
well-chosen and your research is thorough. Don’t be afraid to do more research if you
discover a new thread as you’re writing. More info on the research process is
available in our "Conducting Research" resources.
As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography (see our page on the
this type of document). Much of the information used in an annotated bibliography can
be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit review
as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on
among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just summarizing it. This
means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly
conversation on a topic over time. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because
they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some
strategies to help you:
It often helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show
your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the rest of
your paper.
Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all
your sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. What are they saying
to each other?
Look at the in-text citations in each paragraph. Are you citing just one source for
each paragraph? This usually indicates summary only. When you have multiple
sources cited in a paragraph, you are more likely to be synthesizing them (not
always, but often
Read more about synthesis here.
The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for
all situations). Often, the literature review is where you can establish your research as
filling a particular gap or as relevant in a particular way. You have some chance to do
this in your introduction in an article, but the literature review section gives a more
extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would like your
readers to see it. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of
and whose definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this
goes for sciences as well). In addressing these points, you argue for your place in the
conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple
reporting of other sources.