Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

MI

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18

1.

- A direct cost can be traced in full to the product, service or department that is being costed
- A particular cost can be a direct cost or an indirect cost, depending on what is being costed
- Expenditure on direct costs will probably vary every period
2.
- A cost unit is a unit of product that has costs attached.
- Cost can be divided into 3 elements: materials, labour and expenses.
- A cost object is anything for which we are trying to ascertain the cost, it could be a unit of
product or service or other items.
- An overhead is another name for an indirect cost.
3. Variable costs: a royalty payment for each unit produced, direct materials for production.
These are likely to increase in line with output levels
4. Cost objects: a packing machine, the factory canteen
5. A retailer currently uses the LIFO, if they decide instead to use the FIFO in a period of
rising prices: the closing inventory value will be higher and the gross profit will be higher
6. Overhead abssorption rate is used to charged overheads to products
7.

Bugeted machine hours: Machining = 7600 = 6x800+4x700


Finishing = 2300 = 2x800+1x700
Production overhead absorption rate per machine hour:
Machining = 38000/7600 = 5
Finishing = 10350/2300 = 4.5
Production overhead per unit of Bubble = 6x5+2x4,5=39
8. Actual overheads were 257500 Absorbed overheads: 6.25 x 44848 = 280300
257500 – 280300 = -22800 => over absorbed
9.

Overhead absorbed = actual overhead + under absorbed overheads = 659075


= consulting hours x budgeted absorption rate
 Budgeted absorption rate = 20.5
10.
- Cost pools in an ABC system are equivalent to cost centres used in traditional absorption
costing
- A cost driver is the factor that influences the cost of an activity
- Process costing is the most appropriate costing method when a continuous flow of identical
units is produced
- In process costing the cost per unit is derived using an averaging calculation
- The aim of target costing is to reduce life cycle costs of new products in order to achieve a
cost that will produce the target profit
- JIT purchasing requires small, frequent deliveries from suppliers as near as possible to the
time the raw materials and parts are needed
11. Marginal cost = variable materials + variable labour + variable production overhead = 70
12.

- Marginal cost = variable material + variable labour = 7.5 => INV valuation = (23000-
21000) x 7.5 = 15000
- Absorption cost = marginal cost + fixed production OH = 11 => INV valuation = 11 x 2000
= 22000
13.

Number of hours to produce each item in Luxury: 21/6 = 3.5


Standard: 9/6 = 1.5
Luxury = 120400 / ((3500x3.5) + (3500x1.5)) = 7
AC of luxury = 7 x 3.5 x 290 + 13630 = 20735
Standard tuong tu
14.

Fixed manufacturing cost per unit 91000/26000 = 3.5


Sales revenue = 24500 x 40 = 980000
Manufacturing cost = 24500 x (18.5+3.5) = 539000
Gross profit = sales – cost = 441000
Selling and administration cost: Variable = 24500 x 9.2 = 225400
Fixed = 49000
Absorption costing net profit = 441000 – (49000+225400) = 166600
Short-cut method:
40 – 18.5 – 9.2 – 91000/26000 = 8.8 = sales price
8.8 x 24500 = 215600
215600 – 49000 = 166600
Absorption costing net profit – difference in profits = marginal costing = 166600 – 1500x3.5
= 161350
Short-cut method:
Marginal costing = 24500 x (40-18.5-9.2) = 301350
MC – fixed cost (91000+49000) = 161350
15.

Difference in profit = (8500-6750) x 3 = 5250


Absorption costing profit = 62100 – 5250 = 56850
16.
MC is simple to operate, there is no under or over absorption of overheads, fixed costs are
the same regardless of activity levels and info from MC more useful for decision making
17.
- If INV levels increase, AC profit is higher than MC profit because the fixed overhead
carried forward in INV
- If INV levels decrease, AC profit is lower than MC profit because the fixed overhead
released from INV
- If INV levels remain the same, AC profit is the same as MC profit
18.

Absorbed fixed production overhead = 42000+6000 = 48000


Absorption rate per unit = 48000/6 = 8 INV decrease = 7100-6000=1100
MC profit = 36000 + 1100x8 = 44800
19.

Fixed cost per unit = 16/4 = 4


Units in closing INV = 17500 – 15000 = 2500
Profit difference = INV increase x fixed overhead per unit = 2500 x 4 = 10000
INV increase => carried forward fixed overhead => profit higher than MC => greater
20.

INV increased by 3000 units and AC is 955500 – 850500 = 105000 higher


Fixed production cost included in INV = 105000/3000 = 35
Budgeted fixed cost/ fixed cost per unit = 1837500/35 = 52500
21.

Labour hours per unit = 42/14 = 3


Fixed production OH absorption rate = 60000/25000 = 2.4
Variable production OH = 3x4 = 12 Fixed production OH = 3x2.4 = 7.2
Total production cost = 8+42+12+7.2 = 69.2 Other OH at 5% = 69.2x5% = 3.46
Full cost = 69.2 + 3.46 = 72.66 Mark up at 50% = 72.66 x 50% = 36.33
Selling price = 72.66 + 36.33 = 108.99
22.

Full cost = 100% MC = 70% => AC = 30%


Mark up 40% => Selling price = 140%
Required mark up on MC = (30+40)/70 x 100% = 100%
23.

Mark up = (16-10)/10 x 100% = 60%


Margin = (16-10)/16 x 100% = 37.5%
24.

Required annual return = 90000 x 20% = 18000


Total cost = 36000 x 5 = 180000
Required % mark up = (18000/180000) x 100% = 10%
Product F selling price = 5 x 10% = 5.5
Profit margin = 0.5/5.5 x 100% = 9.1%
25.
- Goods transfer from A to B a charge is made to B at variable cost. Each quarter B is also
charged with a lump-sum as a share of A’s fixed cost => 2-part transfer pricing system
- A marginal cost-plus system would involve adding a % to MC => provide selling division
with a contribution
- Dual pricing system operates by charging the buying division for transfers at MC and
crediting the selling division with market value and cost-plus transfer price
- Standard cost transfer pricing system is imprecise because it does not specify whether
marginal or full cost is used
26. It is simple to use and the % mark up can be varied are 2 advantages of marginal cost-
plus pricing
27.

The order is acceptable from the company’s point of view and the manager of division V will
make a sub-optimal decision
28.

Cost savings with internal transfer = 10% x VC


Cost savings with internal transfer = 10% x (30 x 60%) = 1.8
Optimum transfer price = external market price – cost savings with internal transfer = 50-
1.8=48.2
29. The budget committee is not responsible for preparing functional budgets
30.
Contribution from external sales + contribution from sales to R = 340000 + 48000 = 388000
Profit = 388000 – fixed cost = 48000
The group will be paying 50-36 = 14
Reducing C profit by 3000x14 = 42000 => 550000 – 42000 = 508000
31.

50% of sales are made on credit => 50% x 165000 = 82500


32. The selling overhead budget is unlikely to be containced in a budget manual
33.

Material S required for production:


Product P: 6000 x 3 x 100/75 = 24000
Product Q: 8100 x 5 x 100/75 = 54000
Total material S required = 78000 + CI = 83000
Budgeted material purchases in litres = 83000 – OI = 63000
Budgeted material purchases in pounds = 63000 x 1.6 = 100800
34.

Dec
Sales in Jan = 1500000 + 250000 = 1750000
COS = 1750000 x 100/125 = 1400000
End of Dec INV = 1400000 x 30% = 420000
Jan
Sales in Feb = 1700000 + 350000 = 2050000
COS = 2050000 x 100/125 = 1640000
End of Jan INV = 1640000 x 30% = 492000
COGS + budgeted CI = 1400000 + 492000 = 1892000
Budgeted purchases = 1892000 – budgeted OI = 1472000
35.
The coefficient of determination (r^2) = (0.97^2) = 0.9409 => 94% of the variation in the
value of ticket sales (y) can be explained by a linear rela with x (adver expenditures). There
is a fairly high degree of positive correlation between adver exp and ticket sales ( r is close to
1)
36.

Total cost incurred in P8 = 50000 x 1.3 = 65000 P7 = 30000 x 1.9 = 57000


VC of miles travelled = 50000 – 30000 = 20000
VC of total cost incurred = 65000 – 57000 = 8000 VC per mile = 8000/20000 = 0.4
FC = 65000 – (50000 x 0.4) = 45000
Forecast maintenance cost for 38000 miles = VC + FC = 38000 x 0.4 + 45000 = 60200
37. Bottom-up/ participative budgets might not be effective in centralised. Imposed/ top-
down budgeting is likely to be most effective
38.
Cash sales = (5% x 10000) x 95% = 475 Feb sales = (17000 x 95%) x 75% = 12112.5
Jan sales = (13000 x 95%) x 23% = 2840.5
 The amount budgeted to be received in March = 15428
39. Selling prices increase may increase receivables (the amount of working capital)
40.

Monthly COS = 20000 x 62.5% = 12500


Existing INV level = 1.5 x 12500 = 18750 New INV level 1 x 12500 = (12500)
 Change in INV level = 18750 – 12500 = 6250
Existing payable = 1 x 12500 = 12500 New payables = 1.3 x 12500 = 16250
 Change in payables = 12500 – 16250 = 3750
 Total change in working capital = 10000
41.

COS for month = 450000 x 70% = 315000


Budgeted payment to TP = 315000 + Decrease in TP + Increase in INV = 343000
42.
Average INV = 650000 INV period = (650 x 365) / 6000 = 39.54 days
Average receivables = 850000 Receivables period = (850 x 365) / 10000 = 31.03
Purchases = COGS + increase in INV = 6m + 100000 = 6.1m
Avarage payables = 225000 Payables period = (225 x 365)/ 6100 = 13.46 days
 Cash operating cycle = 39.54 + 31.03 – 13.46 = 57

43.

Receivables days = (0.9/14.6) x 365 = 22.5


Payables days = (0.6/(14.6/1.25)) x 365 = (18.8)
INV days = (2/(14.6/1.25)) x 365 = 62.5
 Cash operating cycle = 66 days
44. A company sells INV at a profit to a customer on credit => the currnt ratio and liquidity
ratio will increase
45.
46.

You might also like