Module 1
Module 1
Leadership is a process by which an executive can direct, guide and influence the behavior and work of others
towards accomplishment of specific goals in a given situation. Leadership is the ability of a manager to induce
the subordinates to work with confidence and zeal.
Leadership is the potential to influence behaviour of others. It is also defined as the capacity to influence a
group towards the realization of a goal. Leaders are required to develop future visions, and to motivate the
organizational members to want to achieve the visions.
According to Keith Davis, “Leadership is the ability to persuade others to seek defined objectives
enthusiastically. It is the human factor which binds a group together and motivates it towards goals.”
Features of Leadership
• Influence the behaviour of others: Leadership is an ability of an individual to influence the behaviour
of other employees in the organization to achieve a common purpose or goal so that they are willingly
co-operating with each other for the fulfilment of the same.
• Inter-personal process: It is an interpersonal process between the leader and the followers. The
relationship between the leader and the followers decides how efficiently and effectively the targets of
the organization would be met.
• Attainment of common organizational goals: The purpose of leadership is to guide the people in an
organization to work towards the attainment of common organizational goals. The leader brings the
people and their efforts together to achieve common goals.
• Continuous process: Leadership is a continuous process. A leader has to guide his employees every
time and also monitor them in order to make sure that their efforts are going in the same direction and
that they are not deviating from their goals.
• Group process: It is a group process that involves two or more people together interacting with each
other. A leader cannot lead without the followers.
• Dependent on the situation: It is situation bound as it all depends upon tackling the situations present.
Thus, there is no single best style of leadership.
Importance of Leadership:
• Initiating Action: Leadership starts from the very beginning, even before the work starts. A leader is a
person who communicates the policies and plans to the subordinates to start the work.
• Providing Motivation: A leader motivates the employees by giving them financial and non-financial
incentives and gets the work done efficiently. Motivation is the driving force in an individual’s life.
• Providing guidance: A leader not only supervises the employees but also guides them in their work.
He instructs the subordinates on how to perform their work effectively so that their efforts do not get
wasted.
• Creating confidence: A leader acknowledges the efforts of the employees, explains to them their role
clearly and guides them to achieve their goals. He also resolves the complaints and problems of the
employees, thereby building confidence in them regarding the organization.
• Building work environment: A good leader should maintain personal contacts with the employees and
should hear their problems and solve them. He always listens to the point of view of the employees
and in case of disagreement persuades them to agree with him by giving suitable clarifications. In case
of conflicts, he handles them carefully and does not allow it to adversely affect the entity. A positive
and efficient work environment helps in stable growth of the organization.
• Co-ordination: A leader reconciles the personal interests of the employees with the organizational
goals and achieves co-ordination in the entity.
• Creating Successors: A leader trains his subordinates in such a manner that they can succeed him in
future easily in his absence. He creates more leaders.
• Induces change: A leader persuades, clarifies, and inspires employees to accept any change in the
organization without much resistance and discontentment. He makes sure that employees do not feel
insecure about the changes.
Here's an overview of eight common leadership styles, from autocratic to visionary, with a look at the benefits
and challenges of each style:
Also called the “authoritarian style of leadership,” this type of leader is someone who's focused primarily on
results and team efficiency. Autocratic leaders often make decisions alone or with a small and trusted group
and expect employees to do exactly what they’re asked.
Autocratic leaders typically have self-confidence and are self-motivated. They communicate clearly and
consistently, are dependable and follow the rules. They value highly structured environments and are
proponents of supervised work environments.
Benefits: Autocratic leaders can promote productivity through delegation, provide clear and direct
communication and reduce employee stress by making decisions quickly on their own.
Challenges: Autocratic leaders are often prone to high levels of stress because they feel responsible for
everything, plus their lack of flexibility can lead to team resentment.
Bureaucratic leaders are similar to autocratic leaders in that these leaders expect their team members to follow
the rules and procedures precisely as written. The bureaucratic style focuses on fixed duties within a
hierarchical system, where each employee has a set list of responsibilities, and there's little need for
collaboration and creativity.
This leadership style is most effective in highly regulated industries or in departments like finance, health care
or government. This style may fit your leadership approach if you're detail-oriented and task-focused, value
rules and structure, are strong-willed and self-disciplined and have a great work ethic.
Benefits: This style can be efficient in organizations that need to follow strict rules and regulations. These
leaders separate work from relationships to avoid clouding the team's ability to hit goals.
Challenges: This style doesn't promote creativity, which can feel restricting to some employees. This
leadership style is also slow to change and does not thrive in an environment that needs to be dynamic.
3. Coaching leadership style
A coaching leader is someone who can quickly recognize their team members’ strengths, weaknesses and
motivations to help each individual improve. This type of leader often assists team members in setting smart
goals and then provides regular feedback with challenging projects to promote growth. They set clear
expectations and creating a positive, motivating environment.
The coach leadership style is one of the most advantageous for employers as well as the employees they
manage. Unfortunately, it’s often also one of the most underused styles—largely because it can be more time-
intensive than other types of leadership. Coaching leaders are supportive and value learning as a way of
growing. They're self-aware, offer guidance instead of giving commands and ask guided questions.
Benefits: Coaching leadership is positive in nature and promotes the development of new skills, empowers
team members and fosters a confident company culture. They're often seen as valuable mentors.
Challenges: While this style has many advantages, it can be more time-consuming as it requires one-on-one
time with employees which can be difficult to obtain in a deadline-driven environment.
The democratic style (aka the "participative style") is a combination of the autocratic and laissez-faire types
of leaders. A democratic leader asks their team members for input and considers feedback from the team before
they make a decision. Because team members feel their contributions matter, a democratic leadership style is
often credited with fostering higher levels of employee engagement and workplace satisfaction.
Democratic leaders value group discussions and provide all information to the team when making decisions.
They promote a work environment where everyone shares their ideas and are characteristically rational and
flexible.
Benefits: Working under the democratic leadership style, employees can feel empowered, valued and unified.
It has the power to boost retention and morale. It also requires less managerial oversight, as employees are
typically part of decision-making processes and know what they need to do.
Challenges: This leadership style has the potential to be inefficient and costly as it takes time to organize group
discussions, obtain ideas/feedback, discuss possible outcomes and communicate decisions. It also can add
social pressure to members of the team who don’t like sharing ideas in group settings.
The laissez-faire style is the opposite of the autocratic leadership type, focusing mostly on delegating many
tasks to team members and providing little to no supervision. Because a laissez-faire leader doesn't spend their
time intensely managing employees, they often have more time for other projects.
Managers may adopt the laissez-faire style when all team members are highly experienced, well-trained and
require little oversight. However, it can cause a dip in productivity if employees are confused about their
leader’s expectations, or if some team members need consistent motivation and boundaries to work well.
Benefits: The laissez-faire leadership style encourages accountability, creativity and a relaxed work
environment, which often leads to higher employee retention rates.
Challenges: This style typically doesn't work well for new employees, as they need guidance and hands-on
support in the beginning. Other employees may not feel properly supported.
The pacesetting style is one of the most effective for achieving fast results. Pacesetter leaders primarily focus
on performance, often set high standards and hold their team members accountable for achieving their goals.
While the pacesetting leadership style can be motivational in fast-paced environments where team members
need to be energized, it’s not always the best option for team members who need mentorship and feedback.
Benefits: Pacesetting leadership pushes employees to hit goals and accomplish business objectives. It
promotes high-energy and dynamic work environments.
Challenges: Pacesetting leadership can also lead to miscommunications and stressed-out employees as they
are always pushing toward a goal or deadline.
Servant leaders live by a people-first mindset and believe that when team members feel personally and
professionally fulfilled, they’re more effective and more likely to regularly produce great work. Because of
their emphasis on employee satisfaction and collaboration, they tend to achieve higher levels of respect.
Servant leaders motivate their teams and have excellent communication skills. You may find this leadership
style a match for your own style if you tend to encourage collaboration and engagement among team members
and if you commit to growing your team professionally.
Benefits: Servant leaders have the capacity to boost employee loyalty and productivity, improve employee
development and decision-making, cultivate trust and create future leaders.
Challenges: Servant leaders can become burnt out as they often put the needs of their team above their own
They may have a hard time being authoritative when they need to be.
Visionary style is especially helpful for small, fast-growing organizations, or larger organizations experiencing
transformations or restructuring. Visionary leaders tend to be persistent and bold, strategic and open to taking
risks. They're often described as inspirational, optimistic, innovative and magnetic.
Benefits: Visionary leadership can help companies grow, unite teams and the overall company and improve
outdated technologies or practices.
Challenges: Visionary leaders may miss important details or other opportunities, like recognizing their teams,
because they’re so focused on the big picture.
Social Leaders: Social leaders frequently use empathetic, collaborative, and advocacy-driven leadership styles
to promote social justice, raise awareness, and mobilize communities for change.
Responsibility and Accountability:
Business Leaders: Business leaders are accountable to their shareholders and the economic performance of
their organizations.
Social Leaders: Social leaders are accountable to the communities they serve, as well as the principles and
causes they champion.
Decision-Making Factors:
Business Leaders: Business decisions are influenced by market dynamics, competition, and profit
considerations.
Social Leaders: Social leaders base their decisions on ethical considerations, social impact assessments, and
the well-being of the affected communities.
Long-Term vs. Immediate Impact:
Business Leaders: Business leaders often focus on achieving short- and long-term financial goals, which can
result in more immediate impacts on the economy and employment.
Social Leaders: Social leaders may work towards long-term structural changes that lead to lasting
improvements in society, even if the immediate impact may be less visible.