English HL p1 GR 12 Memo Sept2020
English HL p1 GR 12 Memo Sept2020
English HL p1 GR 12 Memo Sept2020
SENIOR CERTIFICATE
GRADE 12
SEPTEMBER 2020
MARKS: 70
NOTE:
INSTRUCTIONS TO MARKERS
For multiple-choice questions, accept BOTH the letter corresponding to the correct
answer AND/OR the answer written out in full.
SECTION A: COMPREHENSION
QUESTIONS: TEXT A
1.1 The writer wants the reader to be able to identify with the issue of human
cloning stated in the rhetorical question, so that the reader would be
interested enough to continue reading.
[NOTE: this is a split mark. If the candidate only mentions ‘to involve the
reader’, only 1 mark can be awarded. The second mark is awarded for the
identification of the issue/topic (i.e. human cloning). Candidates should
explain the ISSUE with which the reader identifies.] (2)
1.3 The successful cloning shows us that human cloning is perhaps possible,
but it also demonstrates how extremely difficult it would be to clone an
adult. (2)
1.4 Scientists discovered that the technique used to clone other mammals had
to be modified to clone a primate successfully. (2)
1.5 The nucleus from the original egg of an adult monkey is removed.
The chromosomes from the donor cell are extracted and placed inside the
egg from which the nucleus has been removed.
Scientists stimulate the egg to grow in a surrogate womb.
1.6 The word, ‘apparently’ casts doubt on the success of the experiment. At
this early stage the baby monkeys still look healthy, but if there are any
abnormalities, they will only be discovered as they grow older, which may
influence the success of the experiment. (2)
1.7 The word, ‘cute’ evokes an emotional response to the monkeys. The
cuteness of the two monkeys is all the more heart wrenching when one
takes into account that scientific experiments will be conducted on them.
The ethical issues raised by these experiments are being emphasised as
monkeys are so close to humans. (2)
1.9 Yes, the protection of human life is paramount. During the process of
cloning the monkeys, 79 embryos were implanted, but Hua Hua and
Zhong Zhong were the only two “normal” babies. These experiments are
bad enough when one thinks about all the monkeys who died during the
process; the thought of this happening to human babies makes the
process completely reprehensible.
OR
No, IVF began with research that was thought to be unsafe and unethical,
but today it is a normal procedure which does not lead to the birth defects
that were predicted. Cloning is, therefore, not necessarily disrespectful of
human life. All the ethical concerns raised by the possibility of human
cloning might not be realised, just as the fears about IVF were not
realised.
1.10 The writer is of the opinion that the only reason for wanting to clone
oneself would be ‘vanity’, as one would only want a copy of oneself in
order to achieve a form of immortality. It is, therefore, not surprising that
most of the requests came from Hollywood, where film stars – who are
notorious for their vanity and inflated sense of importance – live.
1.13 In Text B, Frame 1, the scientist states that some people are critical of
scientists who think they are God, because they clone humans. The writer
suggests in paragraph 10 of Text A that we are judgemental about the
technology used to make babies (‘about our prejudices towards
reproductive technologies’).
In Text B the scientist is of the opinion that the cloning of a human embryo
is a scientific triumph. However, in Text A, paragraph 10, the writer says
we should be concerned about the ethics/right and wrong of some of the
current medical breakthroughs (‘our ability to make wise decisions about
biomedical advances’).
Text A, therefore, partially agrees with the critics in Text B, because the
writer thinks we miss the point if we do not think that cloning humans is
unethical/unwise (‘would be foolish and lacking solid motivation’).
However, he does admit that some of the criticism is unfounded (‘baseless
reasons often advanced against it’).
TOTAL SECTION A: 30
SECTION B: SUMMARY
Use the following main points that the candidate should include in the summary as
a guideline.
QUOTATIONS POINTS
1 ‘If children are often exposed to 1 Children who are over-exposed to
scenes of violence, they may violence in the media might view
develop a view of the world as a the world as more dangerous than
more dangerous place than it is.’ it really is.
2 ‘those exposed to violence 2 They become more antisocial.
become more antisocial’.
3 ‘those exposed to violence 3 They could experience emotional
become more … emotionally stress.
distressed’.
OR OR
‘in terms of sadness and a lack of They are likely to be sad and
enthusiasm.’ unenthusiastic.
4 ‘The results were similar for boys 4 Boys and girls are affected in a
and girls: …’ similar fashion.
5 ‘they lack remorse, lie, are 5 They might lack remorse, lie, or be
manipulative and show insensitive and manipulative.
insensitivity to the emotions of
others.’
6 ‘significant associations between 6 They also struggle to pay attention
exposure to violent media and in class.
classroom attention problems.’
7 ‘can develop a deformed 7 They could have a distorted idea of
perception of violence’. violence.
8 ‘its actual frequency in real life.’ 8 They think that violence is much
more prevalent than it really is.
9 ‘filled with ill-intentioned people’/ 9 People are perceived as having ill
‘interpret an ambiguous or intentions. / They might think even
accidental gesture as hostile or incidental gestures are personal
as a personal attack.’ attacks.
PARAGRAPH FORM
Both boys and girls who are over-exposed to violence in the media might perceive
the world as more dangerous than it really is. They tend to lie, are antisocial, lack
remorse, and become manipulative and insensitive to others. They could also
display emotional distress, appearing sad and unenthusiastic. These children often
exhibit attention disorders in class. They sometimes have a distorted perception of
reality, thinking violence is more prevalent than it actually is. Even incidental
gestures are often interpreted as personal attacks.
[82 words]
Mark allocation:
o 7 marks for 7 points (1 mark per main point)
o 3 marks for language
o Total marks = 10
NOTE:
Format:
Even if the summary is presented in the incorrect format, it must be assessed.
Word count:
Markers are required to verify the number of words used.
Do not deduct any marks if the candidate fails to indicate the number of words
used, or if the number of words used is indicated incorrectly. If the word limit is
exceeded, read up to the last sentence above the stipulated upper limit and
ignore the rest of the summary.
TOTAL SECTION B: 10
Marking SECTION C:
Spelling:
o One-word answers must be marked correct even if the spelling is
incorrect, unless the error changes the meaning of the word.
o In full sentence answers, incorrect spelling should be penalised if the
error is in the language structure being tested.
o Where an abbreviation is tested, the answer must be punctuated
correctly.
Sentence structures must be grammatically correct and given in full
sentences/as per instruction.
For multiple-choice questions, accept BOTH the letter corresponding with the
correct answer AND/OR the answer written out in full as correct.
4.1 The little girl is irritated by her father’s attempts to record everything. This is
indicated by the word, ‘DAD’ being written in capital letters, with an
exclamation mark, in bold and being underlined. The word, ‘parade’ is also
underlined to emphasise her irritation. (2)
4.2 The pedestrians in the background change with each consecutive frame.
The father’s feet change with each consecutive frame as he is walking
backwards.
The girl’s cape is floating behind her, indicating her movement.
[Award full marks only if both frames are mentioned AND explained.] (3)
It could also be argued that the writer is satirising the lengths that parents
will go to in order to help their children overcome traumatic events, as well
as the rather selfish tendency of children to ignore the pain of others and
focus on their own desires. (3)
[10]
5.4 The Lego Group had its start/was started/originated in the carpentry
workshop of Ole Kirk Christiansen.
5.5 ‘leg godt’ is a Danish word/foreign word used in an English passage. (1)
5.6 The Lego Group began making its famous plastic interlocking blocks in
1949. (1)
5.7 ‘they became very popular as the company made them part’ (1)
5.8 The Lego Group patented the LEGO® block design still in use today on
January 28, 1958.
TOTAL SECTION C: 30
GRAND TOTAL: 70