The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction
The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction
The Persistence of Hope in Dystopian Science Fiction
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Modern Language Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to PMLA.
http://www.jstor.org
correspondents abroad
The Persistence of
Hope inDystopian
Science Fiction
ITIS
WIDELYACCEPTEDTODAYTHAT,
WHENEVER
WE RECEIVE
OR
PRODUCECULTURE,
WE DO SO FROMA CERTAINPOSITIONAND
RAFFAELLA BACCOLINI
that such location influences how we theorize about and read the world.
Because I am an Italian trained in the United(specializing in States
American modernism) in the 1980s, my reading of science fiction has
been shaped by my cultural and biographical circumstances as well as by
my geography. It is a hybrid approach, combining these circumstances
primarily with an interest in feminist theory and in writing by women.
From the very beginning I have foregrounded issues of genre writing as
they intersect with gender and the deconstruction of high and low cul
ture. Such an approach, however, must also come to terms with the polit
ical and cultural circumstances that characterize this turn of the century.
I consider myself a "child of conflict," to borrow the words the Eku
menical Envoy uses to describe the Terran Observer Sutty in Ursula K.
Le Guin's The Telling (26). Born in 1960,1 have no direct recollection
of 1968; rather, I belong to the generation of the 1970s, which like the
rest of Italy was marked by the "years of lead" (anni di piombo) of ter
rorism?the attacks by the Red Brigades that between 1976 and 1980
killed almost a hundred people as well as the bombings by extreme-right
terrorists together with state apparatuses that, from 1969 on, killed many
more This is perhaps one of the reasons the recent produc
people. why
tion of dystopian science fiction speaks to me more than do the Utopias
of the 1960s and early 1970s. And, to a certain extent, the years of lead
also have shaped my approach to science fiction. I find in the recent
Raffaella Baccolini is professor of En works of the genre, in their themes and in their formal features, a new
glish at the University of Bologna, Fori). oppositional and resisting form of writing, one that maintains a Utopian
She is the author of Tradition, Identity, horizon in the pages of dystopian science fiction and in these anti
Desire: Revisionist Strategies in H.D.'s
utopian times.
Late Poetry (Patron, 1995) and coeditor,
reaction of the 1980s and the triumph of free
Since the conservative
with Tom Moylan, of Dark Horizons:
market liberalism of the 1990s, Utopia has been both attacked and co-opted.
Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagi
She is cur
It has been conflated with materialist satisfaction and thus commodified
nation (Routledge, 2003).
on memory, and devalued. In a society where consumerism has come to represent the
rently working nostalgia,
and deferral in utopia. of happiness, has become an outmoded
contemporary modality Utopia
want to question the notion of genre, boundaries, high culture" (Marc Angenot qtd. in Parrinder
and exclusionary politics?notions and prac 46). In its developments, it has come to repre
tices that have proved detrimental for women? sent a form of counternarrative to hegemonic
and investigate instead the intersection of discourse. In its extrapolation of the present, it
gender and generic fiction. The ways in which has the potential to envision different worlds
gender enters into and is constructed by the that can work as a purely imaginative (at worst)
form of genre have some bearing on, in turn, the or a critical (at best) exploration of our
society.
creation of new critical texts. Science fiction has then the potential, through
estrangement and cognitive mapping, to move sure, allow readers and protagonists to hope: the
0 its reader to see the differences of an elsewhere
k ambiguous, open endings maintain the Utopian
?s and thus think critically about the reader's own impulse within the work. In fact, by rejecting
tt world and possibly act on and change that world. the traditional subjugation of the individual at
e Women's science fiction novels have contributed the end of the novel, the critical dystopia opens
tt
to the exploration and subsequent breakdown of a space of contestation and opposition for those
C
0 certainties and universalist and other ex-centric
a assumptions?those groups?women subjects
tt
tt damaging stereotypes?about gendered identi whose subject position is not contemplated by
ties by addressing, in a dialectical engagement hegemonic discourse?for whom subject status
o
w with tradition, themes such as the representation has yet to be attained.
of women and their bodies, reproduction and sex Another factor thatmakes these novels sites
uality, and language and its relation to identity. of resistance and oppositional texts is their
But genres change in relation to the times, blending of different genre conventions. Draw
and our times, characterized by a general shift to ing on the feminist criticism of universalist as
the right in the 1980s and 1990s, have produced sumptions, singularity, and neutral and objective
what a series of scholars have addressed as a
knowledge and acknowledging the importance
"dystopian turn" inAnglo-American science fic of difference,multiplicity, complexity, situated
tion (see Baccolini and Moylan). After the re knowledges, and hybridity, recent dystopian fic
vival of Utopia in the 1960s and 1970s, the early tion by women resists genre purity in favor of a
1980s saw the appearance of the cyberpunk hybrid text that renovates dystopian science fic
movement, whose somewhat self-indulgent cyn tion by making it politically and formally oppo
icism foreclosed any real subversive critique of sitional. In Kindred, for example, Butler revises
the conservative society. Science fiction's op the conventions of the time travel story and cre
positional and critical potential was instead re ates a novel that is both science fiction and neo
covered and renovated in the production of a slave narrative. Similarly, by fragmenting her
number of writers such as Octavia E. Butler, a
account of future society with a tale (itself the
Piercy, Le Guin, and Kim Stanley Robinson, record of oral storytelling) of sixteenth-century
who turned to dystopian strategies to come to in He, She, and It, Piercy creates an al
Prague
terms with the decade's
silencing and co-opting most historical science fiction novel. While At
of Utopia. This kind of writing, critical and am wood employs the conventions of the diary and
biguous and mainly produced by feminist writ the epistolary novel in The Handmaid's Tale, Le
ers, has become the preferred form for an Guin combines a political fable with storytelling
expression of struggle and resistance. for her most recent novel of cultural contact.
ally a bleak, depressing genre with no space for able borders that allow contamination from
hope in the story, only outside the story: only by other genres, represents resistance to a hege
dred and Parable of the Sower, by resisting clo collective memory to the point that individual
ft
memory has been erased; individual recollec need to pass through the critical dystopias of 0
-i
tion therefore becomes the first, necessary step today tomove toward a horizon of hope. "1
ft
for a collective action. In classical dystopia,
^
"0
memory remains too often trapped in an indi 0
2
vidual and regressive nostalgia, but critical a.
ft
dystopias show that a culture of memory?one 2
**>
that moves from the individual to the collec
Works Cited
tt
The Handmaid's
part of a social project of hope. But the
tive?is Atwood, Margaret. Tale. Boston: Hough CP
ton, 1985. -?
presence of Utopian hope does not necessarily 0
Baccolini, Raffaella, and Tom Moylan, eds. Dark Horizons: &
mean a happy Rather, awareness and re a
ending. Science Fiction and the Dystopian New
Imagination.
sponsibility are the conditions of the critical York: Routledge, 2003.
citizens. A sense of sadness accom Butler, Octavia E. Kindred. 1979. London: Women's, 1995.
dystopia's
the awareness and knowledge that the -. Parable of the Sower. New York: Warner, 1993.
panies
Anne. Feminist Fiction: Feminist Uses
protagonist has attained. Instead of providing Cranny-Francis, of
Generic Fiction. New York: St. Martin's, 1990.
some compensatory and conclusion,
comforting
Jameson, Fredric. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a
the critical dystopia's open ending leaves its Act. Ithaca: Cornell 1981.
Socially Symbolic UP,
characters to deal with their choices and respon Le Guin, Ursula K. The Telling. New York: Harcourt, 2000.
sibilities. It is in the acceptance of responsibility Orwell, George. Nineteen Eighty-Four. New York: Harcourt,
of recent decades, as they are the prod tobiography." Life/Lines: Theorizing Women's Autobiog
dystopias
raphy. Ed. Bella Brodzki and Schenck. Ithaca: Cornell
uct of our dark times. By looking at the formal
UP, 1993.281-305.
and political features of science fiction, we can Suvin, Darko. "Theses on Dystopia 2001." Baccolini and
see how these works point us toward change. We Moylan 187-201.