Admin Topic
Admin Topic
Admin Topic
LAW
INTRODUCTION
Administrative law is the branch of law that deals with the formation and functioning
of administrative bodies and controls them. These administrative bodies are those
bodies that are controlled by the executive branch of the government which include
various departments like tax, environment, labour, and health, etc., It deals with the
legal working and decision-making of these agencies. It monitors the relationship
between the state and the people and provides remedies to those people whose rights
and individual liberty are affected due to the abuse of power by administrative
agencies. It ensures transparency in the working, decision-making, and
administration of these bodies. Tribunals, boards, and commissions are all dealt with
under administrative law. This body of legislation also includes provisions for police,
international trade, manufacturing, the environment, taxation, broadcasting,
immigration, and transportation.[1]
According to Prof. H.W.R. Wade; Administrative law is the law relating to the control
of governmental powers.[3]
According to K.C. Davis; Administrative law is the law concerned with the powers
and procedures of administrative agencies, including especially the law governing
judicial review of administrative action.[5]
According to the Indian Law Institute, Administrative law deals with the power of
administration, how those powers are exercised, what are the limits on those powers,
how these powers are kept within those limits, what procedure is followed by
administrative authorities, and what are the remedies available to a person when
affected by the administration.[6]
In India, the history of administrative law can be dated back to the later Vedic period
during the existence of glorious empires like the Mauryans and Guptas. These
dynasties are known for their central administrative system. The concepts of justice
and fairness were considered supreme by the kings and the administration carried on
these concepts. Later on, when the East Indian Company was established, the
company introduced various statutes for the better functioning of the company and
the people. After the company was abolished and the British crown started ruling
directly, many laws, statutes, and acts were passed for the welfare of the public. After
independence, the country has become a welfare state from a police state. It is
mentioned in the constitution as when it was framed, the concept of the welfare state
has become more popular and it was mentioned even in the directive principles of
state policy in the constitution. Since it became a welfare state, it had to prioritise the
citizens’ welfare. To be a welfare state, the government has to ensure the political
justice, social, and economic well-being of the citizen. It should endure equal and fair
treatment irrespective of caste, creed, race, religion, and gender. It should provide
equal opportunities to everyone. Due to this, the government had to introduce and
implement many laws, and because of this, the burden fell on the organs of
government to manage them. The judiciary had cases piled up in the courts which
made the judicial process slow. To reduce the burden of work on the organs of
government, administrative law was introduced. In administrative law, there are
tribunals which are quasi-judicial authorities that work under the executive but have
judicial authority and functions. Some of the tribunals are company law tribunals,
labour law tribunals, etc.[7]
Administrative law has been derived from various sources. Some of the main sources
of this law are mentioned below in detail-
CONSTITUTION:
It’s considered one of the most important sources of administrative law as the
constitution provides the basic legal framework to the state. It provides the powers,
functions, limitations, and responsibilities to the organs of the government.
According to Article 73[8] associated with the Constitution, the Union’s executive
power extends to subjects for which Parliament has legislative authority. Article
62[9] confers similar authority to states. Tribunals, the public sector, and government
responsibility are also included in the Constitution, which are essential parts of
administrative law.[10]
Laws can also be formulated from various case laws. This arises when laws need to be
changed as per the requirements of society and there are no laws on that subject
matter at that point of time. In the event of a disagreement between several branches
of the governmental system or between citizens and the administration, the court is
the last arbitrator. In India, the Constitution has supremacy, and the highest court in
the land i.e., the supreme court has the right to interpret it. The courts, via their
numerous judgements on the administration’s use of authority and the
accountability of the state in cases of infringement of contract or tortious acts by
government officials, establish administrative rules that regulate their future
behaviour.[11]
ACTS/ STATUTES:
Law is divided into categories to help structure it and make it easier to grasp.
Administrative law is also a legal classification. It is an aspect of public law.
Administrative law can further be classified into various categories for a better
understanding of the law and enables better governance. Some of the categories of
administrative law are explained below as follows:
Enforcement: Administrative agencies are responsible for enforcing the rules and
regulations that they have set. In India, the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)
is in charge of enforcing environmental legislation, conducting inspections, and
prosecuting non-compliant enterprises or persons.
CASE LAWS
In this case, L. Chandra Kumar, the petitioner, challenged the legality of several
sections of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985. The petitioner said that the Act,
which established administrative tribunals to adjudicate service issues, violated the
fundamental structure of the Constitution by intruding on the judiciary’s jurisdiction.
The issue was a disagreement on the jurisdiction and powers of administrative
tribunals in comparison to normal courts. The Supreme Court ruled that Tribunals
are the courts of first instance in the fields of law for which they were established.
Through an appeal, all Tribunal rulings are reviewed by the Division Bench of the
High Court, under whose authority the concerned Tribunal falls.[18]
In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Tribunal cannot take over the tasks of
the disciplinary body. The disciplinary authority will investigate whether or not the
accusations are true. Indeed, even after the disciplinary proceedings have concluded,
if the matter is brought before a court or tribunal, they have no jurisdiction to
investigate the truth of the charges or the correctness of the findings rendered by the
disciplinary authority, or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be. The
court/tribunal’s job is one of judicial review, intending to ensure that the individual
is treated fairly.”[22]
In this case, a member of a committee charged with selecting applicants for a certain
position was a contender for the job himself, and his impartiality was called into
question. Though the process of selecting candidates for government positions is
administrative, the selection committee is required to behave judicially. The court
remarked that the boundary separating administrative authority from quasi-judicial
power is exceedingly thin and is increasingly being destroyed. This case also
established the principle of natural justice as the foundation of administrative law.
The Supreme Court also held that the administrative authorities must follow natural
justice principles such as audi alteram partem (hear the other side) and Nemo judex
in causa sua (no one should be a judge in their cause) when making decisions
affecting individuals’ rights and interests.
In this case, the petitioner’s passport has been taken into custody by the passport
authorities. The petitioner challenged the authority’s decision. It was ruled that the
obligation to act judicially does not need to be established and may be deduced from
the basis of the authority bestowed, how it is used, and its effect upon the rights of
the individual affected. Although this case focused on the right to personal liberty
under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution, it also highlighted the significance of
procedural due process in administrative operations. The Supreme Court ruled that
in depriving persons of their rights, administrative authorities must follow fair and
equitable processes.
CONCLUSION
Administrative law is a law that deals with administrative agencies and controls them. It is a subset of public law.
It has been defined by various scholars in different perspectives. There is no universally accepted definition for
the same. It has been derived from various sources like the Constitution, judicial decisions, statutes, international
treaties, and ordinances, etc. The existence of this law dates back to the later Vedic period but the modern
administrative law has its roots from British rule. The law helps in balancing the power and authority of the three
organs of the government and also protects individual rights and liberties. This law is classified into various
categories for better framework and understanding like substantive, procedural, external, internal, delegated
legislation, etc. For a better understanding of the law, the researcher has mentioned a few case laws which played
a role in interpreting the law. This law protects the public interests and its classification helps in understanding
the relationship between the administrative agencies and individuals better.In this article, we have discussed the
concept of administrative law, its sources, its background, and its classification. We have also discussed a few case
laws for a better understanding of the topic.