Backward Bending Supply Curve of Labour
Backward Bending Supply Curve of Labour
Backward Bending Supply Curve of Labour
Such a comparison generally means that a higher wage entices people to spend more time working for pay;
the substitution effect implies a positively sloped labour supply curve. However, the backward-bending
labour supply curve occurs when an even higher wage actually entices people to work less and consume
more leisure or unpaid time.
Contents
Overview
Assumptions
Caveats
Inverted S shaped supply curve
See also
References
Overview
As wages increase above the subsistence level (discussed below), there are two considerations affecting a
worker's choice of how many hours to work per unit of time (usually day, week, or month). The first is the
substitution or incentive effect. With wages rising, the tradeoff between working an additional hour for pay
and taking one extra hour of unpaid time changes in favor of working. Thus, more hours of labour-time
will be offered at the higher wage than the lower one. The second and countervailing effect is that the hours
worked at the old wage rate now all gain more income than before, creating an income effect, which
encourages more leisure to be chosen because it is more affordable. Most economists assume that unpaid
time (or "leisure") is a normal good and so people want more of it as their incomes (or wealth) rise. Since a
rising wage rate raises incomes, all else constant, the attraction of unpaid time rises, eventually neutralising
the substitution effect and causing the backward bend.
The graph shows that if real wages were to increase from W1 to W2, the substitution effect for an
individual worker outweighs the income effect; therefore, the worker would be willing to increase hours
worked for pay from L1 to L2. However, if the real wage increased from W2 to W3, the number of hours
offered to work for pay would fall from L2 to L3 since the strength of the income effect now exceeds that
of the substitution effect; the utility to be gained from an extra hour of unpaid time is now greater than the
utility to be gained from extra income that could be earned by working the extra hour.
The above examines only the effect of changing wage rates on workers already subject to those rates; only
those individuals' labour supply response was considered. The additional labour supplied by workers
working in other sectors (or unemployed), who are now more attracted to the jobs in the sector because it is
paying higher wages, was not considered. Thus, for a given market, the wage at which the labour supply
curve bends backward may be higher than the wage at which a given worker's curve bends back.
On the other hand, for the aggregate labour market, a labour market without "other sectors" for workers,
the original story of the backward-bending labour-supply curve applies except that some workers suffer
from involuntary unemployment.
Assumptions
It is essential to understand that with the supply curve of labour, there must be assumptions set which takes
the curve's inevitable backward bending form. The assumptions for the theory of labour supply are listed as
follows:
Workers choose whether they will work, and how many hours they will work. This is
important to understand because workers are the focus of the labour supply theory. Labour
supply depends on the notion that workers choose how many output of time they will work. If
the workers choose not to work, that is essentially working leisure, in terms of time.
There are no contractual obligations to work a certain number of hours. This is important to
understand because contractual obligations will involve the labour supply curve to be set,
and not on the basis of time worked.
Workers are utility-maximising agents. In terms of the economy, workers always want to
achieve the most money or output they can receive.
Work provides a disutility, which must be compensated for by paying wages.
Unpaid leisure time is a "normal" good.
The labour market is competitive, and both firms and workers are price-takers.
Wage received is a form of a reservation wage, as workers will have a certain required
amount of wage that can take them away from leisure. This sets an opportunity cost-
minimizing situation for the worker.
Caveats
Higher pay for overtime hours can reduce or negate the effect of a backward bending labour
supply curve, by increasing wages only for hours worked beyond a certain amount. Overtime
maintains the substitution effect at a high labour supply. However, the income effect from the
wages increasing on all the previous hours worked is eliminated. Thus, higher hourly
overtime pay can cause workers to work more hours than if the higher rate is paid on all
hours.
Workers must have a willingness to want to work. Workers have a certain required amount of
wage that can take them away from leisure. This is known as the reservation wage. This
sets an opportunity cost-minimizing situation for the worker, as the worker will always want
to receive the most output they can. If not enough wage is offered to clear the reservation
wage boundary, the worker will not work and instead consume their utility with leisure.
See also
Motivation crowding theory
Self-determination theory
References
1. Friedman, Jack P. (2000-05-01). Dictionary of Business Terms (https://archive.org/details/dict
ionaryofbusi00frie_1). Barron's Educational Series. ISBN 978-0-7641-1200-3.
2. Dasgupta, Purnamita and Goldar, Bishwanath (2006). "Female Labour Supply in Rural
India: An Econometric Analysis (http://www.iegindia.org/workpap/wp265.pdf) Archived (http
s://web.archive.org/web/20160107205245/http://iegindia.org/workpap/wp265.pdf) 2016-01-
07 at the Wayback Machine" Indian Journal of Labor Economics, 49(2), 293-310.
3. Sharif, Mohammed (2000) "Inverted 'S' – The Complete Neoclassical Labour-Supply
Function." International Labour Review, 139(4): 409-35; plus Dessing, Maryke (2002) "Labor
supply, the family and poverty: the S-Shaped Labor Supply Curve," Journal of Economic
Behavior & Organization, 49(4) December: 433–458; and (2008) "The S-Shaped Labor
Supply Schedule: Evidence from Industrialized Countries," Journal of Economic Studies,
35(5-6): 444-85; and Bendewald, Jennifer. Subsistence Theory in the U.S. Context: A
CrossSectional Labor Supply Estimate (http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/cgi/viewconte
nt.cgi?article=1005&context=economics_honors_projects). krishna
[1]