Lecture7 With Examples
Lecture7 With Examples
Dylan Zwick
Fall 2013
Population Models
Population growth models depends upon two parameters - birth and death.
We call β the “birth rate” of the population, and δ the “death rate” of the
population. The population model is
dP
= (β − δ)P .
dt
The terms β and δ are not necessarily constants, and could themselves
be functions of time or the population size.
The simplest population model is one in which β and δ are constant. In
this scenario the rate of growth of the population is directly proportional
to the population. A population with this characteristic is modeled by the
differential equation
1
dP
= kP .
dt
There are many things in life that actually do fit this model1 , and it
can be a reasonable short-term model for population growth. However,
the thing about exponentials is they grow really, really fast, and no real
population can keep growing exponentially forever. Something, usually
the exhaustion of resources, enters the picture to correct things.
So, let’s look at a slightly more sophisticated population model. Sup-
pose the birth rate of our population is a linear decreasing function of the
population size. So,
β = β0 − β1 P ,
δ = δ0 .
dP
= (β0 − β1 P − δ0 )P ,
dt
dP
= aP − bP 2 .
dt
If the parameters a and b are both positive then the above equation is
called the logistic equation. It’s actually even more convenient to rewrite it
as
dP
= kP (M − P )
dt
2
Example - Solve the logistic growth equation with initial condition P (0) =
P0 > 0.
dP
= kP (M − P ).
dt
This is a separable differential equation, and we can rewrite it as:
dP
= kdt.
P (M − P )
dP dP
− = Mkdt.
P M −P
Integrating both sides gives us:
ln P − ln (M − P ) = Mkt + C.
P
We note ln P − ln (M − P ) = ln . Using this and solving for
M −P
P gives us (after some algebra):
MC
P (t) = .
1 + Ce−M kt
If we plug in P (0) = P0 and solve for C we get, again after a little
algebra:
MP0
P (t) = .
P0 + (M − P0 )e−M kt
This is the solution to the logistic growth equation.
3
Consider a population P (t) of unsophisticated animals in which fe-
males rely solely on chance encounters to meet males for reproductive
purposes.2 Here the rate of growth will be proportional to the product
of the number of males, P/2, and the number of females, P/2. So, births
will occur at a rate kP 2 , and the “birth rate” will be kP . If the death rate,
δ, is constant then the differential equation modeling our population will
be
dP
= kP 2 − δP = kP (P − M).
dt
dP
= kP (P − M).
dt
dP
= kdt.
P (P − M)
Z
1 1
Z
− dp = Mkdt.
P −M P
2
For example, bars on weekends...
4
P −M
ln = Mkt + C.
P
M
P (t) = .
1 − CeM kt
Plugging in P (0) = P0 and solving for C we get, again after some alge-
bra:
MP0
P (t) = .
P0 − (P0 − M)eM kt
5
Finally, in problem 2.1.29 we look at some real world data, namely cen-
sus data for the United States, and examine how well our logistic growth
equation models real world growth. You should find that, while the model
was pretty good up to about 1940, after that things changed, and our pop-
ulation today is actually greater than the model would predict. So, what
gives? Well, there are a lot of reasons why this might be the case, but the
greatest reason is that in the last 60 years science has advanced dramati-
cally, and so we’ve, in effect, been able to modify the carrying capacity of
our environment. Way to go, homo sapiens!