Location via proxy:   [ UP ]  
[Report a bug]   [Manage cookies]                

65687df49621435f859d0f69 45195217850

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Heat transfer 6th edition solution manual

Heat and mass transfer yunus cengel 6th edition solution manual.

SCHEMATIC: qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k = 0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k = 0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-
direction, (2) Steady-state conditions, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: From Equation 1.2 the heat flux is 1 2 x T - TdT q = -k = k dx L ′′ Solving, " x W 10 K q = 0.029 × m K 0.02 m⋅ x 2 W q = 14.5 m ′′ < The
heat rate is 2 x x 2 W q = q A = 14.5 × 4 m = 58 W m ′′ ⋅ < COMMENTS: (1) Be sure to keep in mind the important distinction between the heat flux (W/m2 ) and the heat rate (W). (2) The direction of heat flow is
from hot to cold. (3) Note that a temperature difference may be expressed in kelvins or degrees Celsius.

Solution manual heat and mass transfer cengel 6th edition.

1. PROBLEM 1.1 KNOWN: Thermal conductivity, thickness and temperature difference across a sheet of rigid extruded insulation. FIND: (a) The heat flux through a 2 m × 2 m sheet of the insulation, and (b) The heat rate through the sheet. SCHEMATIC: qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k = 0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k =
0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-direction, (2) Steady-state conditions, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: From Equation 1.2 the heat flux is 1 2 x T - TdT q = -k = k dx L ′′ Solving, " x W 10 K q = 0.029 × m K 0.02 m⋅ x 2 W q = 14.5 m ′′ < The heat rate is 2 x x 2 W q = q A = 14.5 ×
4 m = 58 W m ′′ ⋅ < COMMENTS: (1) Be sure to keep in mind the important distinction between the heat flux (W/m2 ) and the heat rate (W). (2) The direction of heat flow is from hot to cold. (3) Note that a temperature difference may be expressed in kelvins or degrees Celsius. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution
on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 2. PROBLEM
1.2 KNOWN: Inner surface temperature and thermal conductivity of a concrete wall. FIND: Heat loss by conduction through the wall as a function of outer surface temperatures ranging from 15 to 38°C.- SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-direction, (2) Steady-state conditions, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS:
From Fourier’s law, if and k are each constant it is evident that the gradient,xq′′ xdT dx q k′′= − , is a constant, and hence the temperature distribution is linear. The heat flux must be constant under one-dimensional, steady-state conditions; and k is approximately constant if it depends only weakly on temperature. The heat flux and heat rate when the
outside wall temperature is T2 = -15°C are ( ) 21 2 x 25 C 15 CdT T T q k k 1W m K 133.3W m dx L 0.30m − −− ′′ = − = = ⋅ = .

Introduction to heat transfer 6th edition solution manual. Introduction to heat transfer 6th edition solutions. Solution manual heat and mass transfer cengel 6th edition.

1.
Solution manual heat and mass transfer cengel 6th edition.

1.

FIND: (a) The heat flux through a 2 m × 2 m sheet of the insulation, and (b) The heat rate through the sheet. SCHEMATIC: qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k = 0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C qcond A = 4 m2 T2T1 k = 0.029 ⋅ W m K x L = 20 mm T1 – T2 = 10˚C ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-direction, (2) Steady-state
conditions, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: From Equation 1.2 the heat flux is 1 2 x T - TdT q = -k = k dx L ′′ Solving, " x W 10 K q = 0.029 × m K 0.02 m⋅ x 2 W q = 14.5 m ′′ < The heat rate is 2 x x 2 W q = q A = 14.5 × 4 m = 58 W m ′′ ⋅ < COMMENTS: (1) Be sure to keep in mind the important distinction between the heat flux (W/m2 ) and the
heat rate (W). (2) The direction of heat flow is from hot to cold. (3) Note that a temperature difference may be expressed in kelvins or degrees Celsius. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has
been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 2. PROBLEM 1.2 KNOWN: Inner surface temperature and thermal conductivity of a concrete wall. FIND: Heat loss by conduction through
the wall as a function of outer surface temperatures ranging from 15 to 38°C.- SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-direction, (2) Steady-state conditions, (3) Constant properties.
ANALYSIS: From Fourier’s law, if and k are each constant it is evident that the gradient,xq′′ xdT dx q k′′= − , is a constant, and hence the temperature distribution is linear. The heat flux must be constant under one-dimensional, steady-state conditions; and k is approximately constant if it depends only weakly on temperature. The heat flux and heat
rate when the outside wall temperature is T2 = -15°C are ( ) 21 2 x 25 C 15 CdT T T q k k 1W m K 133.3W m dx L 0.30m − −− ′′ = − = = ⋅ = . (1) 2 2 x xq q A 133.3W m 20m 2667 W′′= × = × = . (2) < Combining Eqs. (1) and (2), the heat rate qx can be determined for the range of outer surface temperature, -15 ≤ T2 ≤ 38°C, with different wall
thermal conductivities, k. -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Ambient air temperature, T2 (C) -1500 -500 500 1500 2500 3500 Heatloss,qx(W) Wall thermal conductivity, k = 1.25 W/m.K k = 1 W/m.K, concrete wall k = 0.75 W/m.K Outside surface -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 Ambient air temperature, T2 (C) -1500 -500 500 1500 2500 3500 Heatloss,qx(W) Wall thermal
conductivity, k = 1.25 W/m.K k = 1 W/m.K, concrete wall k = 0.75 W/m.K Outside surface For the concrete wall, k = 1 W/m⋅K, the heat loss varies linearly from +2667 W to -867 W and is zero when the inside and outer surface temperatures are the same. The magnitude of the heat rate increases ith increasing thermal conductivity.w COMMENTS:
Without steady-state conditions and constant k, the temperature distribution in a plane wall would not be linear. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted.
Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
3. PROBLEM 1.3 KNOWN: Dimensions, thermal conductivity and surface temperatures of a concrete slab. Efficiency f gas furnace and cost of natural gas.o FIND: Daily cost of heat loss. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady state, (2) One-dimensional conduction, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: The rate of heat loss by conduction through the
slab is ( ) ( )1 2T T 7 C q k LW 1.4W / m K 11m 8m 4312 W t 0.2 − = = ⋅ × = 0m ° < The daily cost of natural gas that must be combusted to compensate for the heat loss is ( ) ( )g d 6 f qC 4312W $0.01/ MJ C t 24h / d 3600s / h $4.14/ d 0.9 10 J / MJη × = ∆ = × = × < COMMENTS: The loss could be reduced by installing a floor covering with a layer of
insulation between it and the concrete. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of
the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 4. PROBLEM 1.4 KNOWN: Heat flux and surface temperatures associated with a wood slab of prescribed thickness. FIND: Thermal conductivity, k, of the wood. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional conduction in the x-direction, (2) Steady-
state conditions, (3) Constant properties.
ANALYSIS: Subject to the foregoing assumptions, the thermal conductivity may be determined from Fourier’s law, Eq. 1.2. Rearranging, ( ) L W 0.05m k=q 40 T T m 40-20 C x 21 2 ′′ = − PROBLEM 1.8 KNOWN: Dimensions and thermal conductivity of food/beverage container. Inner and outer urface temperatures.s FIND: Heat flux through container
wall and total heat load. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Negligible heat transfer through bottom wall, (3) Uniform surface temperatures and one-dimensional conduction through remaining alls.w ANALYSIS: From Fourier’s law, Eq. 1.2, the heat flux is ( )0.023 W/m K 20 2 CT T 22 1q k 16.6 W/m L 0.025 m ⋅ −− ′′ = = =
< Since the flux is uniform over each of the five walls through which heat is transferred, the eat load ish ( )q q A q H 2W 2W W Wtotal 1 2 1 2′′ ′′⎡ ⎤= × = + + ×⎣ ⎦ <( ) ( )2q 16.6 W/m 0.6m 1.6m 1.2m 0.8m 0.6m 35.9 W⎡ ⎤= + + ×⎣ ⎦ = COMMENTS: The corners and edges of the container create local departures from one- dimensional conduction,
which increase the heat load. However, for H, W1, W2 >> L, the effect is negligible. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work
beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been
adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 9. PROBLEM 1.9 KNOWN: Masonry wall of known thermal conductivity has a heat rate which is 80% of that through a composite wall of
prescribed thermal conductivity and thickness. FIND: Thickness of masonry wall. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Both walls subjected to same surface temperatures, (2) One- dimensional conduction, (3) Steady-state conditions, (4) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: For steady-state conditions, the conduction heat flux through a one- dimensional wall
follows from Fourier’s law, Eq. 1.2, ′′q = k T L ∆ where ∆T represents the difference in surface temperatures. Since ∆T is the same for both walls, it follows that L = L k k q q1 2 1 2 2 1 ⋅ ′′ ′′ . With the heat fluxes related as ′′= ′′q 0.8 q1 2 L = 100mm 0.75 W / m K 0.25 W / m K 1 0.8 = 375mm.1 ⋅ ⋅ × < COMMENTS: Not knowing the temperature
difference across the walls, we cannot find the value of the heat rate. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that
permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 10.
PROBLEM 1.10 KNOWN: Thickness, diameter and inner surface temperature of bottom of pan used to boil ater. Rate of heat transfer to the pan.w FIND: Outer surface temperature of pan for an aluminum and a copper bottom. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) One-dimensional, steady-state conduction through bottom of pan. ANALYSIS: From
Fourier’s law, the rate of heat transfer by conduction through the bottom of the pan is T T1 2q kA L − = Hence, qL T T1 2 kA = + where ( )22 2A D / 4 0.2m / 4 0.0314 m .π π= = = Aluminum: ( ) ( ) 600W 0.005 m T 110 C 110.40 C1 2240 W/m K 0.0314 m = + = ⋅ < Copper: ( ) ( ) 600W 0.005 m T 110 C 110.24 C1 2390 W/m K 0.0314 m = + = ⋅ <
COMMENTS: Although the temperature drop across the bottom is slightly larger for aluminum (due to its smaller thermal conductivity), it is sufficiently small to be negligible for both materials. To a good approximation, the bottom may be considered isothermal at T ≈ 110 °C, which is a desirable feature of pots and pans. Excerpts from this work may
be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the
copyright owner is unlawful. 11. PROBLEM 1.11 KNOWN: Dimensions and thermal conductivity of a chip. Power dissipated on one surface. FIND: Temperature drop across the chip. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Constant properties, (3) Uniform heat dissipation, (4) Negligible heat loss from back and sides, (5) One-
dimensional conduction in chip.
ANALYSIS: All of the electrical power dissipated at the back surface of the chip is transferred by conduction through the chip. Hence, from Fourier’s law, P = q = kA T t ∆ or ( ) t P 0.001 m 4 W T = kW 150 W/m K 0.005 m 2 2 ⋅ × ∆ = ⋅ <∆T = 1.1 C. COMMENTS: For fixed P, the temperature drop across the chip decreases with increasing k and W, as
well as with decreasing t. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted.
Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 12.
PROBLEM 1.12 KNOWN: Heat flux gage with thin-film thermocouples on upper and lower surfaces; output oltage, calibration constant, thickness and thermal conductivity of gage.v FIND: (a) Heat flux, (b) Precaution when sandwiching gage between two materials. SCHEMATIC: dd ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) One-dimensional
heat conduction in gage, (3) Constant properties. ANALYSIS: (a) Fourier’s law applied to the gage can be written as ′′q = k T x ∆ ∆ and the gradient can be expressed as AB T E/ = x S d ∆ ∆ ∆ N where N is the number of differentially connected thermocouple junctions, SAB is the Seebeck coefficient for type K thermocouples (A-chromel and B-alumel),
and ∆x = d is the gage thickness. Hence, AB k E q = NS d ∆ ′′ ′′ ⋅ × × × × × × q = 1.4 W / m K 350 10-6 V 5 40 10-6 V / C 0.25 10-3 m = 9800 W / m2. < (b) The major precaution to be taken with this type of gage is to match its thermal conductivity with that of the material on which it is installed. If the gage is bonded between laminates (see sketch
above) and its thermal conductivity is significantly different from that of the laminates, one dimensional heat flow will be disturbed and the gage will read incorrectly. COMMENTS: If the thermal conductivity of the gage is lower than that of the laminates, will it indicate heat fluxes that are systematically high or low? Excerpts from this work may be
reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the
copyright owner is unlawful. 13. PROBLEM 1.13 KNOWN: Hand experiencing convection heat transfer with moving air and water. FIND: Determine which condition feels colder. Contrast these results with a heat loss of 30 W/m2 under ormal room conditions.n SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Temperature is uniform over the hand’s surface, (2)
Convection coefficient is uniform over the hand, and (3) Negligible radiation exchange between hand and surroundings in the case f air flow.o ANALYSIS: The hand will feel colder for the condition which results in the larger heat loss.
The heat oss can be determined from Newton’s law of cooling, Eq. 1.3a, written asl ( )sq h T T∞′′ = − For the air stream: ( )2 2 airq 40W m K 30 5 K 1,400W m′′ ⎡ ⎤= ⋅ − − =⎣ ⎦ < For the water stream: ( )2 2 waterq 900W m K 30 10 K 18,000W m′′ = ⋅ − = < COMMENTS: The heat loss for the hand in the water stream is an order of magnitude larger
than when in the air stream for the given temperature and convection coefficient conditions. In contrast, the heat loss in a normal room environment is only 30 W/m2 which is a factor of 400 times less than the loss in the air stream. In the room environment, the hand would feel comfortable; in the air and water streams, as you probably know from
experience, the hand would feel uncomfortably cold since the heat loss is excessively high.
Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act
without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 14. PROBLEM 1.14 KNOWN: Power required to maintain the surface temperature of a long, 25-mm diameter cylinder with an imbedded electrical heater for different air velocities. FIND: (a) Determine the convection coefficient for each of the air velocity conditions and display the results
graphically, and (b) Assuming that the convection coefficient depends upon air velocity as h = VC n , determine the parameters C and n. SCHEMATIC: V(m/s) 1 2 4 8 12 ′Pe (W/m) 450 658 983 1507 1963 h (W/m2 ⋅K) 22.0 32.2 48.1 73.8 96.1 ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Temperature is uniform over the cylinder surface, (2) Negligible radiation xchange
between the cylinder surface and the surroundings, (3) Steady-state conditions.e ANALYSIS: (a) From an overall energy balance on the cylinder, the power dissipated by the electrical heater is transferred by convection to the air stream.
Using Newton’s law of cooling on a per nit length basis,u ( )(e sP h D T Tπ ∞′ = − ) where is the electrical power dissipated per unit length of the cylinder. For the V = 1 m/s condition, using the data from the table above, find eP′ ( ) 2h 450W m 0.025m 300 40 C 22.0W m Kπ= × − = ⋅ < Repeating the calculations, find the convection coefficients for the
remaining conditions which are abulated above and plotted below. Note that h is not linear with respect to the air velocity.t (b) To determine the (C,n) parameters, we plotted h vs. V on log-log coordinates. Choosing C = 22.12 W/m2 ⋅K(s/m)n , assuring a match at V = 1, we can readily find the exponent n from the slope of the h vs. V curve. From the
trials with n = 0.8, 0.6 and 0.5, we recognize that n = 0.6 is a reasonable choice. Hence, C = 22.12 and n = 0.6. < 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Air velocity, V (m/s) 20 40 60 80 100 Coefficient,h(W/m^2.K) Data, smooth curve, 5-points 1 2 4 6 8 10 Air velocity, V (m/s) 10 20 40 60 80 100 Coefficient,h(W/m^2.K) Data , smooth curve, 5 points h = C * V^n, C = 22.1,
n = 0.5 n = 0.6 n = 0.8 COMMENTS: Radiation may not be negligible, depending on surface emissivity.
Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act
without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 15. PROBLEM 1.15 KNOWN: Long, 30mm-diameter cylinder with embedded electrical heater; power required to maintain a specified surface temperature for water and air flows. FIND: Convection coefficients for the water and air flow convection processes, hw and ha, respectively.
SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Flow is cross-wise over cylinder which is very long in the direction normal to flow. ANALYSIS: The convection heat rate from the cylinder per unit length of the cylinder has the form ( ) (q = h D T Tsπ′ − ∞) and solving for the heat transfer convection coefficient, find ( ) q h = . D T Tsπ ′ − ∞ Substituting numerical
values for the water and air situations: Water ( ) 28 10 W/m h = = 4,570 W/m K 0.030m 90-25 C 3 2 w π × ⋅ × < Air ( ) 400 W/m h = 65 W/m K. 0.030m 90-25 C 2 a π = ⋅ × < COMMENTS: Note that the air velocity is 10 times that of the water flow, yet hw ≈ 70 × ha. These values for the convection coefficient are typical for forced convection heat
transfer with liquids and gases. See Table 1.1. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107
or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 16. PROBLEM 1.16 KNOWN: Dimensions of a cartridge heater. Heater power.
Convection coefficients in air and water at a prescribed temperature. FIND: Heater surface temperatures in water and air. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) All of the electrical power is transferred to the fluid by convection, (3) Negligible heat transfer from ends. ANALYSIS: With P = qconv, Newton’s law of cooling yields
( ) ( )P=hA T T h DL T T P T T . h DL s s s π π − = − = + ∞ ∞ ∞ In water, T C + 2000 W 5000 W / m K 0.02 m 0.200 m s 2= ⋅ × × × 20 π Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 17. PROBLEM
1.17 KNOWN: Length, diameter and calibration of a hot wire anemometer. Temperature of air tream. Current, voltage drop and surface temperature of wire for a particular application.s FIND: Air velocity SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Negligible heat transfer from the wire by atural convection or radiation.n
ANALYSIS: If all of the electric energy is transferred by convection to the air, the following equality must be satisfied ( )P EI hA T Telec s= = − ∞ where ( ) 5 2A DL 0.0005m 0.02m 3.14 10 m .π π −= = × = × Hence, ( ) ( ) EI 5V 0.1A 2h 318 W/m K 5 2A T Ts 3.14 10 m 50 C × = = = −− ∞ × ⋅ ( ) 25 2 5 2V 6.25 10 h 6.25 10 318 W/m K 6.3 m/s− −= ×
= × ⋅ = < COMMENTS: The convection coefficient is sufficiently large to render buoyancy (natural convection) and radiation effects negligible. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been
adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
18. PROBLEM 1.18 KNOWN: Chip width and maximum allowable temperature.
Coolant conditions. FIND: Maximum allowable chip power for air and liquid coolants. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Negligible heat transfer from sides and bottom, (3) Chip is at a uniform temperature (isothermal), (4) Negligible heat transfer by adiation in air.r ANALYSIS: All of the electrical power dissipated in the
chip is transferred by convection to he coolant. Hence,t P = q and from Newton’s law of cooling, P = hA(T - T∞) = h W 2 (T - T∞). n air,I Pmax = 200 W/m 2 ⋅K(0.005 m) 2 (85 - 15) ° C = 0.35 W. < n the dielectric liquidI Pmax = 3000 W/m 2 ⋅K(0.005 m) 2 (85-15) ° C = 5.25 W. < COMMENTS: Relative to liquids, air is a poor heat transfer fluid. Hence,
in air the chip can dissipate far less energy than in the dielectric liquid. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that
permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 19.
PROBLEM 1.19 KNOWN: Length, diameter and maximum allowable surface temperature of a power ransistor. Temperature and convection coefficient for air cooling.t FIND: Maximum allowable power dissipation.
SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Negligible heat transfer through base of ransistor, (3) Negligible heat transfer by radiation from surface of transistor.t ANALYSIS: Subject to the foregoing assumptions, the power dissipated by the transistor is equivalent to the rate at which heat is transferred by convection to the air.
Hence, ( )P q hA T Telec conv s= = − ∞ where ( ) ( )22 4A DL D / 4 0.012m 0.01m 0.012m / 4 4.90 10 m .π π −⎡ ⎤= + = × + = × ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ 2 For a maximum allowable surface temperature of 85°C, the power is <( ) ( )2 4 2P 100 W/m K 4.90 10 m 85 25 C 2.94 Welec −= ⋅ × − = COMMENTS: (1) For the prescribed surface temperature and convection
coefficient, radiation will be negligible relative to convection. However, conduction through the base could be significant, thereby permitting operation at a larger power. (2) The local convection coefficient varies over the surface, and hot spots could exist if there are locations at which the local value of h is substantially smaller than the prescribed
average value. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States
Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 20. PROBLEM 1.20 KNOWN: Air jet impingement is an effective means of cooling logic chips. FIND: Procedure for measuring convection coefficients associated with a 10 mm × 10 mm chip. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: Steady-state conditions. ANALYSIS: One approach
would be to use the actual chip-substrate system, Case (a), to perform the measurements.
In this case, the electric power dissipated in the chip would be transferred from the chip by radiation and conduction (to the substrate), as well as by convection to the jet. An energy balance for the chip yields .
Hence, withelec conv cond radq q q q= + + ( )conv sq hA T T∞= − , where A = 100 m2 is the surface area of the chip,m ( ) elec cond rad s q q q h A T T∞ − − = − (1) While the electric power (q ) and the jet (Telec ∞) and surface (T ) temperatures may be measured, losses from the chip by conduction and radiation would have to be estimated. Unless
the losses are negligible (an unlikely condition), the accuracy of the procedure could be compromised by uncertainties associated ith determining the conduction and radiation losses. s w A second approach, Case (b), could involve fabrication of a heater assembly for which the conduction and radiation losses are controlled and minimized. A 10 mm ×
10 mm copper block (k ~ 400 W/m⋅K) could be inserted in a poorly conducting substrate (k < 0.1 W/m⋅K) and a patch heater could be applied to the back of the block and insulated from below. If conduction to both the substrate and insulation could thereby be rendered negligible, heat would be transferred almost exclusively through the block. If
radiation were rendered negligible by applying a low emissivity coating (ε < 0.1) to the surface of the copper block, virtually all of the heat would be transferred by convection to the jet. Hence, q and q may be neglected in equation (1), and the expression may be used to accurately determine h from the known (A) and measured (q , T , T cond rad elec
s ∞) quantities. COMMENTS: Since convection coefficients associated with gas flows are generally small, concurrent heat transfer by radiation and/or conduction must often be considered. However, jet impingement is one of the more effective means of transferring heat by convection and convection coefficients well in excess of 100 W/m2 ⋅K may be
achieved. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States
Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
21. PROBLEM 1.21 KNOWN: Upper temperature set point, Tset, of a bimetallic switch and convection heat transfer coefficient between clothes dryer air and exposed surface of switch. FIND: Electrical power for heater to maintain Tset when air temperature is T∞ = 50°C.
SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Electrical heater is perfectly insulated from dryer wall, (3) Heater and switch are isothermal at Tset, (4) Negligible heat transfer from sides of heater or switch, (5) Switch surface, As, loses heat only by convection. ANALYSIS: Define a control volume around the bimetallic switch which
experiences heat input from the heater and convection heat transfer to the dryer air. That is, ( ) E - E = 0 q - hA T T 0. outin s setelec − =∞ The electrical power required is, ( )q = hA T Ts setelec − ∞ <( )q = 25 W/m K 30 10 m 70 50 K=15 mW.2 -6 2 elec ⋅ × × − COMMENTS: (1) This type of controller can achieve variable operating air temperatures
with a single set-point, inexpensive, bimetallic-thermostatic switch by adjusting power levels to the heater. (2) Will the heater power requirement increase or decrease if the insulation pad is other than perfect?
Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act
without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 22. PROBLEM 1.22 KNOWN: Hot vertical plate suspended in cool, still air. Change in plate temperature with time at the instant when the plate temperature is 225°C. FIND: Convection heat transfer coefficient for this condition. SCHEMATIC: -0.022 K/s-0.022 K/s ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Plate is
isothermal, (2) Negligible radiation exchange with surroundings, (3) Negligible heat lost through suspension wires. ANALYSIS: As shown in the cooling curve above, the plate temperature decreases with time. The condition of interest is for time to. For a control surface about the plate, the conservation of energy requirement is ( ) out stinE - E = E dT
2hA T T Mc− − =s s p dt ∞ where As is the surface area of one side of the plate. Solving for h, find ( ) p s s Mc -dT h = 2A T - T dt∞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ( ) ( ) 2 2 3.75 kg × 2770 J/kg K h = × 0.022 K/s = 6.3 W/m K 2 × 0.3 × 0.3 m 225 - 25 K ⋅ ⋅ < COMMENTS: (1) Assuming the plate is very highly polished with emissivity of 0.08, determine whether radiation
exchange with the surroundings at 25°C is negligible compared to convection. (2) We will later consider the criterion for determining whether the isothermal plate assumption is reasonable. If the thermal conductivity of the present plate were high (such as aluminum or copper), the criterion would be satisfied. Excerpts from this work may be
reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted.
Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 23. PROBLEM 1.23 KNOWN: Width, input power and efficiency of a transmission. Temperature and convection oefficient associated with air flow over the
casing.c FIND: Surface temperature of casing. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady state, (2) Uniform convection coefficient and surface temperature, (3) egligible radiation.N ANALYSIS: From Newton’s law of cooling, ( ) ( )2 s s sq hA T T 6hW T T∞ ∞= − = − where the output power is ηPi and the heat rate is ( )i o iq P P P 1 150hp 746W / hp
0.07 7833Wη= − = − = × × = Hence, ( ) s 2 22 q 7833 W T T 30 C 102.5 C 6 hW 6 200 W / m K 0.3m ∞= + = ° + = ° × ⋅ × < COMMENTS: There will, in fact, be considerable variability of the local convection coefficient over the transmission case and the prescribed value represents an average over the surface. Excerpts from this work may be
reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted.
Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 24. PROBLEM 1.24 KNOWN: Air and wall temperatures of a room. Surface temperature, convection coefficient nd emissivity of a person in the room.a
FIND: Basis for difference in comfort level between summer and winter. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Person may be approximated as a small object in a large enclosure. ANALYSIS: Thermal comfort is linked to heat loss from the human body, and a chilled feeling is associated with excessive heat loss. Because the temperature of the room air is
fixed, the different summer and winter comfort levels cannot be attributed to convection heat transfer from the body. In both cases, the heat flux is Summer and Winter: ( ) 2 2q h T T 2 W/m K 12 C 24 W/mconv s′′ = − = ⋅ × =∞ However, the heat flux due to radiation will differ, with values of Summer: ( ) ( )4 4 8 2 4 4 4 4 q T T 0.9 5.67 10 W/m K 305
300 K 28.3 W/mrad s surεσ −′′ = − = × × ⋅ − = 2 Winter: ( ) ( )4 4 8 2 4 4 4 4 q T T 0.9 5.67 10 W/m K 305 287 K 95.4 W/mrad s surεσ −′′ = − = × × ⋅ − = 2 There is a significant difference between winter and summer radiation fluxes, and the chilled ondition is attributable to the effect of the colder walls on radiation.c COMMENTS: For a
representative surface area of A = 1.5 m 2 , the heat losses are qconv = 36 W, qrad(summer) = 42.5 W and qrad(winter) = 143.1 W. The winter time radiation loss is significant and if maintained over a 24 h period would amount to 2,950 kcal. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing
or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 25.
PROBLEM 1.25 KNOWN: Diameter and emissivity of spherical interplanetary probe. Power dissipation within probe. FIND: Probe surface temperature. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Negligible radiation incident on the probe. ANALYSIS: Conservation of energy dictates a balance between energy generation within the
probe and radiation emission from the probe surface. Hence, at any instant -E + E = 0out g ε σA T Es s 4 g= E T D 1/4 g s 2επ σ ⎛ ⎞ = ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎝ ⎠ ( ) 150W T 2 40.8 0.5 m 5.67 10 1/4 s 2 8 W/m Kπ ⎛ ⎞ ⎜ ⎟= ⎜ ⎟×⎝ ⎠ − ⋅ FIND: Acceptable power dissipation for operating the package surface temperature in the range Ts = 0 to 85°C. Show graphically the
effect of emissivity variations for 0.2 and 0.3.4 SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Uniform surface temperature, (2) Chamber walls are large compared to the pherical package, and (3) Steady-state conditions.s ANALYSIS: From an overall energy balance on the package, the internal power dissipation Pe will be transferred by radiation exchange
between the package and the chamber walls. From Eq. 1.7, ( )4 4 rad e s s surq = P = εA σ T - T For the condition when Ts = 40°C, with As = πD2 the power dissipation will be ( ) ( )42 2 -8 2 4 4 4 eP = 0.25 π × 0.10 m × 5.67 ×10 W m K × 40 + 273 - 77 K = 4.3 W⎡ ⎤⋅ ⎢ ⎥⎣ ⎦ < Repeating this calculation for the range 40 ≤ Ts ≤ 85°C, we can obtain the
power dissipation as a function of surface temperature for the ε = 0.25 condition. Similarly, with 0.2 or 0.3, the family of curves shown below has been obtained. 40 50 60 70 80 90 Surface temperature, Ts (C) 2 4 6 8 10 Powerdissipation,Pe(W) Surface emissivity, eps = 0.3 eps = 0.25 eps = 0.2 COMMENTS: (1) As expected, the internal power
dissipation increases with increasing emissivity and surface temperature. Because the radiation rate equation is non-linear with respect to temperature, he power dissipation will likewise not be linear with surface temperature.t (2) What is the maximum power dissipation that is possible if the surface temperature is not to exceed 85°C? What kind of a
coating should be applied to the instrument package in order to approach this limiting condition? Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of
this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 27. PROBLEM 1.27 KNOWN: Hot plate suspended in vacuum and surroundings temperature. Mass, specific heat, area and time rate of change of plate temperature. FIND: (a) The emissivity of the
plate, and (b) The rate at which radiation is emitted from the plate. SCHEMATIC: Ts stE qrad qrad T = 25sur ˚C Ts = 225˚C Plate, 0.3 m 0.3 m M = 3.75 kg, cp = 2770 ⋅J kg K T(t) tt0 dT K= -0.022 sdt × Ts stE qrad qrad Ts stE qrad qrad T = 25sur ˚C Ts = 225˚C Plate, 0.3 m 0.3 m M = 3.75 kg, cp = 2770 ⋅J kg K T(t) tt0 dT K= -0.022 sdt T(t) tt0 dT
K= -0.022 sdt × ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Plate is isothermal and at uniform temperature, (2) Large surroundings, (3) Negligible heat loss through suspension wires. ANALYSIS: For a control volume about the plate, the conservation of energy requirement is (1)in out stE - E = E where st p dT E = Mc dt (2) and for large surroundings (3)4 4 in out sur sE - E
= Aεσ(T - T ) Combining Eqns. (1) through (3) yields p 4 4 sur s dT Mc dtε = Aσ (T - T ) Noting that Tsur = 25˚C + 273 K = 298 K and Ts = 225˚C + 273 K = 498 K, we find -8 4 4 4 2 4 J K 3.75 kg × 2770 × (-0.022 ) kg K s ε = = 0.42 W 2 × 0.3 m × 0.3 m × 5.67 × 10 (498 - 298 ) K m K ⋅ ⋅ < The rate at which radiation is emitted from the plate is 4
rad,e sq = εAσT -8 4 2 4 W = 0.42 × 2 × 0.3 m × 0.3 m × 5.67 × 10 × (498 K) m K⋅ = 264 W < COMMENTS: Note the importance of using kelvins when working with radiation heat transfer.
Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act
without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 28. PROBLEM 1.28 KNOWN: Length, diameter, surface temperature and emissivity of steam line. Temperature and convection coefficient associated with ambient air. Efficiency and fuel cost for gas fired urnace.f FIND: (a) Rate of heat loss, (b) Annual cost of heat loss. SCHEMATIC: = 0.8=
0.8 ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steam line operates continuously throughout year, (2) Net radiation ransfer is between small surface (steam line) and large enclosure (plant walls).t ANALYSIS: (a) From Eqs. (1.3a) and (1.7), the heat loss is ( ) ( )4 4 conv rad s s surq q q A h T T T T∞ ⎡ ⎤= + = − + − ⎣ ⎦ εσ where ( ) 2 A DL 0.1m 25m 7.85m .= = × =π π Hence,
( ) ( )2 2 8 2 4 4 4 q 7.85m 10 W/m K 150 25 K 0.8 5.67 10 W/m K 423 298 K−⎡ ⎤= ⋅ − + × × ⋅ − ⎣ ⎦ 4 ( ) ( )2 2 q 7.85m 1,250 1,095 W/m 9813 8592 W 18,405 W= + = + = < (b) The annual energy loss is 11 E qt 18,405 W 3600 s/h 24h/d 365 d/y 5.80 10 J= = × × × = × With a furnace energy consumption of the annual cost of the loss is11 f fE E/ 6.45
10 J= = ×η , <5 g fC C E 0.01 $/MJ 6.45 10 MJ $6450= = × × = COMMENTS: The heat loss and related costs are unacceptable and should be reduced by insulating the steam line. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses
for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
29. PROBLEM 1.29 KNOWN: Exact and approximate expressions for the linearized radiation coefficient, hr and hra, respectively. FIND: (a) Comparison of the coefficients with ε = 0.05 and 0.9 and surface temperatures which may exceed that of the surroundings (Tsur = 25°C) by 10 to 100°C; also comparison with a free convection coefficient
correlation, (b) Plot of the relative error (hr - rra)/hr as a function of the furnace temperature ssociated with a workpiece at Ta s = 25°C having ε = 0.05, 0.2 or 0.9. ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Furnace walls are large compared to the workpiece and (2) Steady-state onditions.c ANALYSIS: (a) The linearized radiation coefficient, Eq. 1.9, follows from the
radiation exchange rate equation, ( )( )2 2 r s sur s sh T T T Tεσ= + + ur If Ts ≈ Tsur, the coefficient may be approximated by the simpler expression ( )3 r,a s surh 4 T T T Tεσ= = + 2 For the condition of ε = 0.05, Ts = Tsur + 10 = 35°C = 308 K and Tsur = 25°C = 298 K, find that ( )( )8 2 4 2 2 3 2 rh 0.05 5.67 10 W m K 308 298 308 298 K 0.32W m
K−= × × ⋅ + + = ⋅ < ( )( )38 2 4 3 2 r,ah 4 0.05 5.67 10 W m K 308 298 2 K 0.32W m K−= × × × ⋅ + = ⋅ < The free convection coefficient with Ts = 35°C and T∞ = Tsur = 25°C, find that ( ) ( )1/3 1/31/3 2 sh 0.98 T 0.98 T T 0.98 308 298 2.1W m K∞= ∆ = − = − = ⋅ < For the range Ts - Tsur = 10 to 100°C with ε = 0.05 and 0.9, the results for the
coefficients are tabulated below. For this range of surface and surroundings temperatures, the radiation and free convection coefficients are of comparable magnitude for moderate values of the emissivity, say ε > 0.2. The pproximate expression for the linearized radiation coefficient is valid within 2% for these conditions.a (b) The above expressions
for the radiation coefficients, hr and hr,a, are used for the workpiece at Ts = 25°C placed inside a furnace with walls which may vary from 100 to 1000°C. The relative error, (hr - hra)/hr, will be independent of the surface emissivity and is plotted as a function of Tsur. For Tsur > 200°C, the approximate expression provides estimates which are in
error more than 5%. The approximate expression should be used with caution, and only for surface and surrounding temperature differences of 50 to 100°C. Coefficients (W/m2 ⋅K) Ts (°C) ε hr hr,a h 35 0.05 0.32 0.32 2.1 0.9 5.7 5.7 135 0.05 0.51 0.50 4.7 0.9 9.2 9.0 100 300 500 700 900 Surroundings temperature, Tsur (C) 0 10 20 30 Relativeerror,
(hr-hra)/hr*100(%) Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United
States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 30. PROBLEM 1.30 KNOWN: Chip width, temperature, and heat loss by convection in air. Chip emissivity and temperature of large surroundings. FIND: Increase in chip power due to radiation. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Radiation
exchange between small surface and large enclosure.
ANALYSIS: Heat transfer from the chip due to net radiation exchange with the surroundings is ( )q = W T - T2 4 4 surrad ε σ ( ) ( )q = 0.9 0.005 m 5.67 10 W/m K 358 - 288 K 2 8 2 4 4 4 rad × ⋅ 4− qrad = 0.0122 W. The percent increase in chip power is therefore ∆P P qrad qconv W 0.350 W × = × = × =100 100 0 0122 100 35%.
. . < COMMENTS: For the prescribed conditions, radiation effects are small. Relative to convection, the effect of radiation would increase with increasing chip temperature and decreasing convection coefficient. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only
to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 31. PROBLEM 1.31 KNOWN: Width, surface emissivity and maximum allowable
temperature of an electronic chip. emperature of air and surroundings. Convection coefficient.T FIND: (a) Maximum power dissipation for free convection with h(W/m 2 ⋅K) = 4.2(T - T∞) 1/4 , (b) aximum power dissipation for forced convection with h = 250 W/m 2 ⋅K.M SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Radiation exchange
between a small surface and a large enclosure, (3) Negligible heat transfer from sides of chip or from back of chip by conduction hrough the substrate.t ANALYSIS: Subject to the foregoing assumptions, electric power dissipation by the chip must be balanced by convection and radiation heat transfer from the chip. Hence, from Eq. (1.10), ( ) ( )4 4P q
q hA T T A T Telec conv rad s s surε σ= + = − + −∞ where ( )22 4A L 0.015m 2.25 10 m .−= = = × 2 (a) If heat transfer is by natural convection, ( ) ( )( )5/ 4 5/ 42 5/4 4 2q C A T T 4.2 W/m K 2.25 10 m 60K 0.158 Wconv s −= − = ⋅ × =∞ ( ) ( )4 2 8 2 4 4 4 4q 0.60 2.25 10 m 5.67 10 W/m K 358 298 K 0.065 Wrad − −= × × ⋅ − =

Substituting numerical values, with ( )2 p pA = D / 4 ,π find ( )( ) ( )2 8 2 4 4 4 4 elecq = 0.25 0.3 m / 4 5.67 10 W/m K 300 - 77 K 8.1 W.−× ⋅ =π < (b) From an energy balance on the enclosure, radiative transfer heats the liquid nitrogen stream causing evaporation, E - E = 0 q - m h = 0in out rad LN2 fg where is the liquid nitrogen consumption rate.
Hence,mLN2 The energy generation term is associated with conversion of some other energy form (chemical, electrical, electromagnetic or nuclear) to thermal energy. The energy storage term is associated with changes in the internal, kinetic and/or potential energies of the matter in the control volume. , are volumetric phenomena. The electrical
power delivered by the battery is P = VI = 24V×6A = 144 W. in outE , E gE stE gE stE Control volume: Resistor. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 35. t PROBLEM 1.34 (Cont.) Control
volume: Battery-Resistor System. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 37. PROBLEM 1.36 KNOWN: Blood inlet and outlet temperatures and flow rate. Dimensions of tubing. FIND: Required
rate of heat addition and estimate of kinetic and potential energy changes. 1.6 mm 6.4 mm Tout = 37°C 2 m Ạ = 200 mℓ/min, Tin = 10°CBlood 1.6 mm 6.4 mm Tout = 37°C 2 m Ạ = 200 mℓ/min, Tin = 10°CBloodSCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Incompressible liquid with negligible kinetic and potential energy changes, (3)
Blood has properties of water. PROPERTIES: Table A.6, Water ( T ≈ 300 K): cp,f = 4179 J/ kg· K, ρf = 1/vf = 997 kg/m3 . ANALYSIS: From an overall energy balance, Equation 1.11e, p out inq = mc (T - T ) where 3 -6 3 fm = ρ = 997 kg/m × 200 m /min × 10 m /m 60 s/min = 3.32 × 10 kg/s∀ -3 Thus -3 o o q = 3.32 × 10 kg/s × 4179 J/kg K × (37 C - 10
C) = 375 W⋅ < The velocity in the tube is given by -6 3 -3 -3 cV = /A = 200 m /min × 10 m /m (60 s/min × 6.4 × 10 m × 1.6 × 10 m)= 0.33 m/s∀ The change in kinetic energy is 2 -3 21 1 2 2 m( V - 0) = 3.32 × 10 kg/s × × (0.33 m/s) = 1.8 × 10 W-4 < The change in potential energy is -3 2 mgz = 3.32 × 10 kg/s × 9.8 m/s × 2 m = 0.065 W < COMMENT:
The kinetic and potential energy changes are both negligible relative to the thermal energy change. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation
of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 38. PROBLEM 1.37 KNOWN: Daily hot water consumption for a family of four and temperatures associated with ground ater and water storage tank. Unit cost of electric power. Heat pump
COP.w FIND: Annual heating requirement and costs associated with using electric resistance heating or a eat pump.h SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Process may be modelled as one involving heat addition in a closed system, (2) Properties of water are constant.
PROPERTIES: Table A-6, Water ( = 308 K): ρ =avgT 1 fv− = 993 kg/m3 , = 4.178 kJ/kg⋅K.p,fc ANALYSIS: From Eq. 1.11a, the daily heating requirement is daily tQ U Mc T= ∆ = ∆ ( )f iVc T Tρ= − . With V = 100 gal/264.17 gal/m3 = 0.379 m3 , ( ) ( )3 3 dailyQ 993kg / m 0.379m 4.178kJ/kg K 40 C 62,900kJ= ⋅ = ×The annual heating requirement is
then, , or, ith 1 kWh = 1 kJ/s (3600 s) = 3600 kJ, ( ) 7 annualQ 365days 62,900kJ/day 2.30 10 kJ= = w 43. PROBLEM 1.41 (Cont.) (b) Using the foregoing equations, the heat fluxes and initial rate of temperature change for each mode can be calculated for selected gap separations L and range of hot plate temperatures Th with Tw = 20°C. 300 500 700
900 1100 1300 Hot plate temperature, Th (C) 0 50 100 150 200 Initialrateofchange,dTw/dt(K.s^-1) q''rad q''cond, L = 1.0 mm q''cond, L = 0.5 mm q''cond, L = 0.2 mm 300 500 700 900 1100 1300 Hot plate temperature, Th (C) 0 100 200 300 400 Heatflux(kW/m^2) q''rad q''cond, L = 1.0 mm q''cond, L = 0.5 mm q''cond, L = 0.2 mm In the left-hand
graph, the conduction heat flux increases linearly with Th and inversely with L as expected. The radiative heat flux is independent of L and highly non-linear with Th, but does not approach that for the highest conduction heat rate until Th approaches 1200°C. The general trends for the initial temperature-time change, (dTw/dt)i, follow those for the
heat fluxes. To reach 900°C in 10 s requires an average temperature-time change rate of 90 K/s. Recognizing that (dTw/dt) will decrease with increasing Tw, this rate could be met only with a very high Th and the smallest L. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional
purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 44. PROBLEM 1.42 KNOWN: Silicon wafer, radiantly heated by
lamps, experiencing an annealing process with known ackside temperature.b FIND: Whether temperature difference across the wafer thickness is less than 2°C in order to avoid amaging the wafer.d SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) One-dimensional conduction in wafer, (3) Radiation exchange between upper surface of
wafer and surroundings is between a small object and a arge enclosure, and (4) Vacuum condition in chamber, no convection.l PROPERTIES: Wafer: k = 30 W/m⋅K, 0.65.ε α= = ANALYSIS: Perform a surface energy balance on the upper surface of the wafer to determine .
The processes include the absorbed radiant flux from the lamps, radiation exchange with the hamber walls, and conduction through the wafer. w,uT c in outE E′′ ′′− = 0 0s rad cdq q qα ′′ ′′ ′′− − = ( ) w,u w,4 4 s w,u sur T T q T T k L α εσ 0 − ′′ − − − = ( )( )45 2 8 2 4 4 w,u0.65 3.0 10 W / m 0.65 5.67 10 W / m K T 27 273 K−× × − × × ⋅ − + 4 (
)w,u30W / m K T 997 273 K / 0.00078 m 0⎡ ⎤− ⋅ − +⎣ ⎦ = ° PROBLEM 1.45 KNOWN: Rod of prescribed diameter experiencing electrical dissipation from passage of electrical urrent and convection under different air velocity conditions.
See Example 1.3.c FIND: Rod temperature as a function of the electrical current for 0 ≤ I ≤ 10 A with convection coefficients of 50, 100 and 250 W/m 2 ⋅K. Will variations in the surface emissivity have a significant ffect on the rod temperature?e SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-state conditions, (2) Uniform rod temperature, (3) Radiation
exchange between the outer surface of the rod and the surroundings is between a small surface and large nclosure.e ANALYSIS: The energy balance on the rod for steady-state conditions has the form, conv rad genq q E′ ′ ′+ = ( ) ( )4 4 2 sur eDh T T D T T I Rπ π εσ∞ ′− + − = Using this equation in the Workspace of IHT, the rod temperature is
calculated and plotted as a function of current for selected convection coefficients. 0 2 4 6 8 10 Current, I (amperes) 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 Rodtemperature,T(C) h = 50 W/m^2.K h = 100 W/m^2.K h = 250 W/m^2.K COMMENTS: (1) For forced convection over the cylinder, the convection heat transfer coefficient is dependent upon air velocity
approximately as h ~ V 0.6 . Hence, to achieve a 5-fold change in the convection coefficient (from 50 to 250 W/m 2 ⋅K), the air velocity must be changed by a factor of early 15.n Continued ….. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled
in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 49. PROBLEM 1.45 (Cont.) (2) For the condition of I = 4 A with h = 50 W/m 2 ⋅K with T = 63.5°C, the
convection and radiation exchange rates per unit length are, respectively, We conclude that convection is the dominant heat transfer mode and that changes in surface emissivity could have only a minor effect. Will this also be the case if h = 100 or 250 W/m conv radq 5.7 W / m and q 0.67 W / m.′ ′= = 2 ⋅K? (3) What would happen to the rod
temperature if there was a “loss of coolant” condition where the air low would cease?f (4) The Workspace for the IHT program to calculate the heat losses and perform the parametric analysis to generate the graph is shown below. It is good practice to provide commentary with the code making your solution logic clear, and to summarize the results.
It is also good practice to show plots in customary units, that is, the units used to prescribe the problem. As such the graph of the rod temperature is shown above with Celsius units, even though the calculations require temperatures in kelvins. // Energy balance; from Ex. 1.3, Comment 1 -q'cv - q'rad + Edot'g = 0 q'cv = pi*D*h*(T - Tinf) q'rad =
pi*D*eps*sigma*(T^4 - Tsur^4) sigma = 5.67e-8 // The generation term has the form Edot'g = I^2*R'e qdot = I^2*R'e / (pi*D^2/4) // Input parameters D = 0.001 Tsur = 300 T_C = T – 273 // Representing temperature in Celsius units using _C subscript eps = 0.8 Tinf = 300 h = 100 //h = 50 // Values of coefficient for parameter study //h = 250 I = 5.2
// For graph, sweep over range from 0 to 10 A //I = 4 // For evaluation of heat rates with h = 50 W/m^2.K R'e = 0.4 /* Base case results: I = 5.2 A with h = 100 W/m^2.K, find T = 60 C (Comment 2 case). Edot'g T T_C q'cv q'rad qdot D I R'e Tinf Tsur eps h sigma 10.82 332.6 59.55 10.23 0.5886 1.377E7 0.001 5.2 0.4 300 300 0.8 100 5.67E-8 */ /*
Results: I = 4 A with h = 50 W/m^2.K, find q'cv = 5.7 W/m and q'rad = 0.67 W/m Edot'g T T_C q'cv q'rad qdot D I R'e Tinf Tsur eps h sigma 6.4 336.5 63.47 5.728 0.6721 8.149E6 0.001 4 0.4 300 300 0.8 50 5.67E-8 */ Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes
only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
50. PROBLEM 1.46 KNOWN: Long bus bar of prescribed diameter and ambient air and surroundings temperatures. Relations for the electrical resistivity and free convection coefficient as a function of temperature. FIND: (a) Current carrying capacity of the bus bar if its surface temperature is not to exceed 65°C; compare relative importance of
convection and radiation exchange heat rates, and (b) Show graphically the operating temperature of the bus bar as a function of current for the range 100 ≤ I ≤ 5000 A for bus-bar diameters of 10, 20 and 40 mm. Plot the ratio of the heat transfer by convection to he total heat transfer for these conditions.t SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Steady-
state conditions, (2) Bus bar and conduit are very long, (3) Uniform bus-bar temperature, (4) Radiation exchange between the outer surface of the bus bar and the conduit s between a small surface and a large enclosure.i PROPERTIES: Bus-bar material, ( )[ ]e e,o o1 T T ,ρ ρ α= + − e,o 0.0171 m,ρ µ= Ω ⋅ , 0 0 oT 25 C= ° 1 0.00396K .α − = ANALYSIS:
An energy balance on the bus-bar for a unit length as shown in the schematic above has the form in out genE E E′ ′ ′− + = 2 rad conv eq q I R′ ′ ′− − + = ( ) ( )4 4 2 sur e cD T T h D T T I / A 0∞− − − − +επ σ π ρ = 4.where Using the relations for2 e e c cR / A and A D /′ = =ρ π ( )e Tρ and ( )h T, D , and substituting numerical values with T = 65°C, find
( ) [ ] [ ]( )4 48 2 4 4 radq 0.85 0.020m 5.67 10 W / m K 65 273 30 273 K 223W / m− ′ = × × ⋅ + − + =π < <( )( )2 convq 7.83W/ m K 0.020m 65 30 K 17.2W/ m′ = ⋅ − =π where ( ) ( )0.25 0.251.75 1.25 2 h 1.21W m K 0.020m 65 30 7.83W / m K −− − = ⋅ ⋅ − = ⋅ ( ) ( )22 2 6 2 5 2 eI R I 198.2 10 m / 0.020 m / 4 6.31 10 I W / m− − ′ = × Ω⋅ = ×π where (
)6 1 e 0.0171 10 m 1 0.00396K 65 25 K 198.2 m− −⎡ ⎤= × Ω⋅ + − = Ω ⎣ ⎦ ρ µ ⋅ The maximum allowable current capacity and the ratio of the convection to total heat transfer rate are ( )cv cv rad cv totI 1950A q / q q q /q 0.072′ ′ ′ ′ ′= + = = . < For this operating condition, convection heat transfer is only 7.2% of the total heat transfer. (b) Using these
equations in the Workspace of IHT, the bus-bar operating temperature is calculated and plotted as a function of the current for the range 100 ≤ I ≤ 5000 A for diameters of 10, 20 and 40 mm.
Also shown below is the corresponding graph of the ratio (expressed in percentage units) of the eat transfer by convection to the total heat transfer, cv totq / q′ ′ Continued ….. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for
which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 51. PROBLEM 1.46 (Cont.) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 Current, I (A) 20 40 60 80 100 Bartemperature,Ts(C) D =
10 mm D = 20 mm D = 40 mm 20 40 60 80 100 Bus bar temperature, T (C) 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 Ratioq'cv/q'tot,(%) D = 10 mm D = 20 mm D = 40 mm COMMENTS: (1) The trade-off between current-carrying capacity, operating temperature and bar diameter is shown in the first graph. If the surface temperature is not to exceed 65°C, the maximum
current capacities for the 10, 20 and 40-mm diameter bus bars are 960, 1950, and 4000 A, espectively.r (2) From the second graph with vs. T, note that the convection heat transfer rate is always a small fraction of the total heat transfer. That is, radiation is the dominant mode of heat transfer. Note lso that the convection contribution increases with
increasing diameter. cv totq / q′ ′ a (3) The Workspace for the IHT program to perform the parametric analysis and generate the graphs is shown below. It is good practice to provide commentary with the code making your solution logic lear, and to summarize the results.c /* Results: base-case conditions, Part (a) I R'e cvovertot hbar q'cv q'rad rhoe D
Tinf_C Ts_C Tsur_C eps 1950 6.309E-5 7.171 7.826 17.21 222.8 1.982E-8 0.02 30 65 30 0.85 */ // Energy balance, on a per unit length basis; steady-state conditions // Edot'in - Edot'out + Edot'gen = 0 -q'cv - q'rad + Edot'gen = 0 q'cv = hbar * P * (Ts - Tinf) P = pi * D q'rad = eps * sigma * (Ts^4 - Tsur^4) sigma = 5.67e-8 Edot'gen = I^2 * R'e R'e =
rhoe / Ac rhoe = rhoeo * (1 + alpha * (Ts - To) ) To = 25 + 273 Ac = pi * D^2 / 4 // Convection coefficient hbar = 1.21 * (D^-0.25) * (Ts - Tinf)^0.25 // Compact convection coeff. correlation // Convection vs. total heat rates cvovertot = q'cv / (q'cv + q'rad) * 100 // Input parameters D = 0.020 // D = 0.010 // Values of diameter for parameter study // D =
0.040 // I = 1950 // Base case condition unknown rhoeo = 0.01711e-6 alpha = 0.00396 Tinf_C = 30 Tinf = Tinf_C + 273 Ts_C = 65 // Base case condition to determine current Ts = Ts_C + 273 Tsur_C = 30 Tsur = Tsur_C + 273 eps = 0.85 Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or
instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful. 52. PROBLEM 1.47 KNOWN: Elapsed times
corresponding to a temperature change from 15 to 14°C for a reference sphere and test sphere of unknown composition suddenly immersed in a stirred water-ice mixture. ass and specific heat of reference sphere.M FIND: Specific heat of the test sphere of known mass. SCHEMATIC: ASSUMPTIONS: (1) Spheres are of equal diameter, (2) Spheres
experience temperature change from 15 to 14°C, (3) Spheres experience same convection heat transfer rate when the time rates of surface temperature are observed, (4) At any time, the temperatures of the spheres are uniform, 5) Negligible heat loss through the thermocouple wires.( PROPERTIES: Reference-grade sphere material: cr = 447 J/kg K.
ANALYSIS: Apply the conservation of energy requirement at an instant of time, Equation .11c, after a sphere has been immersed in the ice-water mixture at T1 ∞. in out stE E E− = conv dT q Mc dt − = where Since the temperatures of the spheres are uniform, the change in energy storage term can be represented with the time rate of temperature
change, dT/dt. The convection heat rates are equal at this instant of time, and hence the change in energy storage erms for the reference (r) and test (t) spheres must be equal. (conv sq h A T T∞= − ). t r r t t r t dT dT M c M c dt dt ⎞ ⎞ =⎟ ⎟ ⎠ ⎠ Approximating the instantaneous differential change, dT/dt, by the difference change over a short eriod of
time, ∆T/∆t, the specific heat of the test sphere can be calculated.p ( ) ( ) t 15 14 K 15 14 K 0.515 kg 447J / kg K 1.263kg c 6.35s 4.59s − − × ⋅ = × × Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has
been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.
54. PROBLEM 1.48 (Cont.) (c) Parametric calculations were performed using the IHT First Law Model for an Isothermal Hollow Sphere. As shown below, there is a sharp increase in temperature with decreasing values of h < 1000 W/m2 ⋅K. For T > 380 K, boiling will occur at the canister surface, and for T > 410 K a condition known as film boiling
(Chapter 10) will occur. The condition corresponds to a precipitous reduction in h and increase in T.
100 400 800 2000 6000 10000 Convection coefficient, h(W/m^2.K) 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Temperature,T(K) Although the canister remains well below the melting point of stainless steel for h = 100 W/m2 ⋅K, boiling hould be avoided, in which case the convection coefficient should be maintained at h > 1000 W/m2 ⋅K.s COMMENTS: The
governing equation of part (a) is a first order, nonhomogenous differential equation with constant coefficients. Its solution is ( )( )Rt Rt iS/R 1 e e− − = − +θ θ , where T T∞≡ −θ , ( )2 3 3 i i p o iS 3q r / c r r′′≡ −ρ , ( )2 3 3 o p o iR 3hr / c r r= −ρ . Note results for t → ∞ and for S = 0. Excerpts from this work may be reproduced by instructors for
distribution on a not-for-profit basis for testing or instructional purposes only to students enrolled in courses for which the textbook has been adopted. Any other reproduction or translation of this work beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act without the permission of the copyright owner is unlawful.

You might also like