74670bos60481 FND p4 cp7 U1
74670bos60481 FND p4 cp7 U1
74670bos60481 FND p4 cp7 U1
UNIT – 1
7.2
CHAPTER OVERVIEW
Public Finance
Fiscal Functions: An
Overview, Centre and
State Finance
1.1 INTRODUCTION
The governments of all nations have important economic functions even where markets
constitute the basic resource allocation mechanism. The size and scope of government in
market economies have grown much larger over the past few decades. The primary goal of
the state is to promote the general welfare of the society. What governments do, or do not
do, will obviously have an important impact on the economic performance of an economy
and the quality of life of its citizens.
Governments at various levels involve in several operations for running the state. For example;
the government raises money from various sources, incurs expenditures, consumes goods and
services, borrows money, employs people, and provides key institutions such as property
rights. The governments also establish and administer rules and regulations and puts in place
policies concerning all aspects of life of people. We have experienced in our day-to-day life
that though governments at various levels impose many rules and regulations in the economy,
some matters still go unregulated. Similarly, most of the goods and services that we consume
are provided to us by private producers, but there is broad agreement that certain goods and
services should be provided exclusively by the government. For a variety of reasons, we believe
that governments should accomplish some activities and should not do others.
As we know, Macroeconomics is the study of the economy as a whole. There are three main
macroeconomic goals for any nation. The first is economic growth. If the real gross domestic
product grows at a faster rate than population, then people can enjoy higher standard of
living. The second goal is high levels of employment which will ensure higher income and
higher output. When unemployment occurs, it harms not only the unemployed, but the society
as a whole because there is loss of output that could have been produced. The third
macroeconomic goal is stable price levels. Inflation reduces real incomes and purchasing
power of some people, and disproportionately affects lower income families. On the contrary,
deflation signals a downturn in economic activity which may cause recession or even
depression and large scale unemployment. By ensuring stable prices, an economy can avoid
prolonged inflation and deflation and achieve high levels of economic activity and
employment.
The government does not expect the economy to function automatically; rather it intervenes
to direct them to function in particular directions. Such intervention on the part of the
government is based on the belief that the objective of the economic system and the role of
government is to improve the wellbeing of individuals and households. The purpose of this
lesson is to examine the economic functions of the government and to understand why the
government should invariably perform them.
The modern society, in general, offers three alternate economic systems through which the
decisions of resource reallocation may be made namely, the market, the government and a
mixed system where both markets and governments simultaneously determine resource
allocation. Correspondingly, we have three economic systems namely, capitalism, socialism
and mixed economy, each with different degrees of state intervention in economic activities.
Adam Smith is often described as a bold advocate of free markets and minimal governmental
activity. Smith believed that government's roles in society should be l imited, but well defined
7.4
However, Smith saw an important resource allocation role for the government when he
underlined the role of government in:
(a) national defence to protect the nation from external violence and invasion,
(b) establishing a system of justice to provide internal law and order and to protect
property
(c) establishment and maintenance of highly beneficial public institutions and public
works such as roads, bridges, canals, harbours, and postal system that profit-seeking
individuals may not be able to efficiently build and operate.
Since the 1930s, more specifically, as a consequence of the great depression, the state’s role
in the economy has been distinctly gaining in importance, and therefore, the traditional
functions of the state have been supplemented with what is referred to as economic functions
(also called fiscal functions or public finance function). While there are differences among
different countries in respect of the nature and extent of government intervention in
economies, all of them agree on one point that the governments are expected to play a major
role in the economy. This comes out of the belief that government intervention will always
influence the performance of the economy in a positive way.
Richard Musgrave, in his classic treatise ‘The Theory of Public Finance’ (1959), introduced the
three-branch taxonomy of the role of government in a market economy. Musgrave believed
that, for conceptual purposes, the functions of the government are to be separated into three,
namely,
The allocation and distribution functions are primarily microeconomic functions, while
stabilization is a macroeconomic function. The allocation function aims to correct the sources
of inefficiency in the economic system, while the distribution role ensures that the distribution
of wealth and income is fair. Monetary and fiscal policies, the problems of macroeconomic
stability, economic growth and maintenance of high levels of employment and price stability
etc. fall under the stabilization function.
The national budget, in general, reflects the economic policy of a government and the
government exercises its economic functions partly through the budget. We shall now discuss
in detail the conceptual three-function framework of the responsibilities of the government.
1.3 THE ALLOCATION FUNCTION
Resource allocation refers to the way in which the available resources or factors of production
are allocated among the various uses to which they might be put. It determines how much of
the various kinds of goods and services will actually be produced in an economy. Resource
allocation is a critical problem because the resources of a society are limited in supply,
whereas the wants of the members of the society are unlimited. In addition, any given resource
can have many alternative uses.
One of the most important functions of an economic system is the optimal or efficient
allocation of scarce resources so that the available resources are put to their best use and no
wastages are there. Economic efficiency indicates a situation in which all resources are
allocated to serve each person in the best way possible, minimising waste and inefficiency.
The private sector resource allocation is characterized by market supply and demand and price
mechanism as determined by consumer sovereignty and producer profit motives. The state’s
allocation, on the other hand, is accomplished through the revenue and expenditure activities
of governmental budgeting. In the real world, resource allocation is determined by both
market and the government.
A market economy is subject to serious malfunctioning in several basic respects. While private
goods will be sufficiently provided by the market, public goods and merit goods will not be
produced in sufficient quantities by the market. Missing markets or nonexistence of markets
occur in a variety of situations. Why do markets fail to give the right answers to the questions
as to how the resources can be efficiently utilised and what goods should be produced and in
what quantities? In other words, why do markets generate misallocation of resources?
Allocative efficiency is concerned with utilizing limited resources to produce goods and
services that would maximize value to the society. Allocative efficiency achieves the largest
possible output of goods and services from the existing stock of resources and technology.
Efficient allocation of available resources in an economy is assumed to take place only when
the markets are perfectly competitive and economic agents make rational choices and
decisions. In reality, markets are never perfectly competitive. Market failures which hinder
efficient allocation of resources occur mainly due to the following reasons:
Externalities which arise when the production and consumption of a good or service
affect third parties (e.g. pollution).
Factor immobility which causes unemployment and inefficiency.
Imperfect information because it may not be in the interests of one party to provide
full information to the other party, and
In the absence of appropriate government intervention, market failures may occur and the
resources are likely to be misallocated with too much production of certain goods or too little
production of certain other goods. For example, the society may produce too much of demerit
goods and too little of merit goods. The allocation responsibility of the governments involves
suitable corrective action when private markets fail to provide the right and desirable
combination of goods and services. Briefly put, market failures provide the rationale for
government’s allocative function.
Let us see a few of many examples of government intervention in resource allocation. You
might have noticed that in many cases, the government can provide us with goods and
services that we cannot produce on our own or buy at a price from the market. For example,
the government establishes property rights and makes the necessary arrangements for
enforcing contracts through provision of law enforcement and courts. When externalities are
involved in the production and consumption of goods and services, prices do not reflect the
true costs and benefits and government intervenes with appropriate corrective measures.
Merit goods which are greatly beneficial to the society are by and large provided by the
government. Production and consumption of demerit goods are controlled with appropriate
policies. These interventions do not imply that markets are replaced by government action. In
its allocation role, the government acts as a complement rather than as a substitute to the
market system in an economy.
The resource allocation role of government’s policy focuses on the potential for the
government to improve economic performance through its expenditure and tax policies. The
allocative function in budgeting determines:
(a) who and what will be taxed
(b) how much and on what the government revenue will be spent
(c) the process by which the total resources of the economy are divided among various
uses
(d) the optimum mix of various social goods (both public goods and merit goods).
(e) the level of involvement of the public sector in the national economy
(f) the reallocation of society’s resources from private use to public use.
A variety of allocation instruments are available by which governments can influence resource
allocation in the economy. For example:
the government may directly produce an economic good (for example, electricity and
public transportation services)
the government may use the price mechanism (i.e altering the market prices
determined by demand and supply through taxes and subsidies) to influence private
allocation by policies that change the behaviour of consumers and producers. In other
words, the government may direct resource allocation through incentives and
disincentives (for example, tax concessions and subsidies may be given for the
production of goods that promote social welfare and higher taxes may be imposed on
goods such as cigarettes and alcohol so that their prices are higher)
the government may influence allocation through legislation and force. For example,
ban of single use plastic goods prevent resources moving into their production.
The competition policies, merger policies etc. affect the structure of industry and
commerce (for example, the Competition Act in India promotes competition and
prevents anti-competitive activities)
governments’ regulatory activities such as licensing, controls, minimum wages, and
directives on location of industry influence resource allocation.
government sets legal and administrative frameworks, and
The distributive function of budget is related to the basic question of ‘for whom’ should an
economy produce goods and services. Governments can redistribute income and wealth
either through the expenditure side or through the revenue side of the budget. On the
expenditure side, governments may provide free or subsidised education, healthcare, housing,
food and basic goods etc. to deserving people. On the revenue side, redistribution is done
through progressive taxation.
Effective demand is determined by the level of income of the households and this, in turn
determines the distribution of real output among people. Therefore, the distribution function
also relates to the manner in which the effective demand over the economic goods is divided
among the various individual and family spending units of the society.
providing security (in terms of fulfillment of basic needs) for people who have
hardships, and ensuring that everyone enjoys a minimum standard of living
A few examples of the redistribution function (or market intervention for socio-economic
reasons) performed by governments are:
taxation policies of the government whereby progressive taxation of the rich is
combined with provision of subsidy to the poor households
proceeds from progressive taxes used for financing public services, especially those
that benefit low-income households (for example, supply of essential food grains at
highly subsidized prices to BPL households)
employment reservations and preferences to protect certain segments of the
population, minimum wages and minimum support prices for farmers for their output
unemployment benefits and transfer payments to provide support to the
underprivileged, dependent, physically handicapped, the older citizens and the
unemployed.
families below the poverty line are provided with monetary aid and aid in kind
regulation of manufacture and sale of certain products to ensure the health and well-
being of consumers, and
special schemes for backward regions and for the vulnerable sections of the
population.
In modern times, most of the egalitarian welfare states provide free or subsidized education
and health-care system, unemployment benefits, pensions and such other social security
measures. There is, nevertheless, an argument that in exercising the redistributive function,
there would be a conflict between efficiency and equity. In other words, governments’
redistribution policies which interfere with producer choices or consumer choices are likely to
have efficiency costs or deadweight losses. For example, greater equity can be achieved
through high rates of taxes on the rich; but high rates of taxes could also act as a disincentive
to entrepreneurship and work, and discourage people from making savings and investments
and taking risks. This in turn will have negative consequences for economic output,
productivity and growth of the economy. Consequently, the potential tax revenue may be
reduced in future and the scope for government’s welfare activities would get seriously
limited. As such, an optimal budgetary policy towards any distributional change should
reconcile the conflicting goals of efficiency and equity by exercising an appropriate trade-off
between them. In other words, redistribution measures should be accomplished with minimal
efficiency costs by carefully balancing equity and efficiency objectives.
The theoretical rationale for the stabilization function of the government is derived from the
Keynesian proposition that a market economy does not automatically generate full
7.10
employment and price stability and therefore, the governments should pursue deliberate
stabilization policies.
The market system has inherent tendencies to create business cycles. The market mechanism
is limited in its capacity to prevent or to resolve the disruptions caused by the fluctuations in
economic activity. The government and the country’s central bank promote full employment
and price stability through prudent fiscal policy and monetary policy. In the absence of
appropriate corrective intervention by government, the instabilities that occur in the economy
in the form of recessions, inflation etc. may be prolonged for longer periods causing enormous
hardships to people, especially the poorer sections of the society. It is also possible that a
situation of stagflation (a state of affairs in which inflation and unemployment exist side by
side) may set in and make the problem more complex. The stabilization issue also becomes
more complex due to ‘contagion effect’ whereby the increased international interdependence
and financial integration causes forces of instability to get easily transmitted from one country
to other countries.
The stabilization function is concerned with the performance of the aggregate economy in
terms of:
labour employment and capital utilization,
overall output and income,
general price levels,
balance of international payments, and
the rate of economic growth.
The stabilization function is one of the key functions of fiscal policy and aims at eliminating
macroeconomic fluctuations arising from suboptimal allocation of resources. As you might
recall, the economic crisis that engulfed the world in 2008 and the more recent global
phenomenon of COVID pandemic-induced economic crisis have highlighted the importance
of macroeconomic stability and have, therefore, revived immense interest in countercyclical
fiscal policy.
The nature of the budget (surplus or deficit) also has important implications on a country’s
economic activity. While deficit budgets are expected to stimulate economic activity, surplus
budgets tend to slow down economic activity.
To sum up;
If there is high inflation the government may decrease government spending, raise
taxes, and/or reduce the money supply
If there is high unemployment the government might increase government spending,
reduce taxes, and/or increase the money supply
There is often a conflict between the different goals and functions of budgetary policy.
Effective policy design to meet the diverse goals of government is very difficult to conceive
and to implement. The challenge before any government is how to design its budgetary policy
so that the pursuit of one goal does not jeopardize the other.
Centre and State Finance
Fiscal federalism, a term introduced by Richard Musgrave, deals with the division of
governmental functions and financial relations among the different levels of government.
Musgrave argued that the federal or central government should be responsible for performing
functions related to economic stabilization and income redistribution, and the allocation of
resources should be the responsibility of the state and local governments.
India is a federation of 28 states and 8 union territories. Fundamentally, federalism is an
institutional arrangement to accommodate two sets of government — one at the national
level and the other at the regional level. Each government is autonomous in its own sphere.
An independent judiciary is established to resolve disputes between the central government
and the states on issues related to division of power.
The constitution of India has provided for the division of powers between the central and the
state governments. Article 246 of the Constitution demarcates the powers of the union and
the state by classifying their powers into three lists, namely union list, state list and the
concurrent list. The union list contains items on which the union parliament alone can
legislate, the state list has items on which the state legislative assemblies alone can legislate,
and the concurrent list, on which both the parliament and the legislative assemblies can
7.12
legislate. In the event of conflicting legislation in concurrent list, the law passed by the centre
prevails.
Allocation of revenue and expenditure responsibilities to different levels of governments is a
fundamental matter in a federation. Sources of revenue for both the centre and states are
clearly demarcated with regard to the financial relationship and the responsibilities between
them.
Taxes are levied by the centre and the states. The central government has greater revenue
raising powers. The union government can levy taxes such as tax on income, other than
agricultural income, customs and export duties, excise duties on certain goods, corporation
tax, tax on capital value of assets excluding agricultural land, terminal taxes, security
transaction tax, central GST, union excise duty, taxes other than stamp duties etc.
The state governments can levy taxes on agricultural income, lands and buildings, mineral
rights, electricity, vehicles, tolls, professions, collect land revenue and impose excise duties on
certain items. The property of the union is exempt from state taxation. The property and
income of the states are not liable to be taxed by the centre.
Distribution of revenue between the union and states is based on the constitutional provisions
as follows:
Besides the above provisions enabling transfer of resources from the centre to the states, a
unique feature of the Indian Constitution is that Article 280 provides for an institutional
mechanism, namely the Finance Commission, to facilitate such transfers. The Finance
Commission is a constitutionally mandated body that is at the centre of fiscal federalism. It is
responsible for evaluating the state of finances of the union and state governments,
recommending the sharing of taxes between them and laying down the principles
determining the distribution of these taxes among states.
(d) Any other matter referred to the Commission by the President in the interests of sound
finance.
While recommending transfers, the Finance Commission considers issues related to vertical
equity (deciding about the share of all states in the revenue collected by centre) and horizontal
equity (allocation among states their share of central revenue). The Finance Commission
broadly assesses the overall gross tax revenues of the union; cesses, surcharges and non-tax
revenue are netted out from gross tax revenue to arrive at the net divisible pool (NDP).
Following a constitutional amendment in year 2000, the divisible pool now consists of all taxes
of the union. Considering the needs of the central and the state governments, the Commission
determines what percentage out of the net divisible pool should be assigned to the state
governments. The balance remains with the central government.
The Fifteenth Finance Commission was constituted on 27, November 2017 against the
background of the abolition of Planning Commission (as also of the distinction between Plan
and non-Plan expenditure) and the introduction of the goods and services tax (GST). The
commission recommended the share of states in the central taxes (vertical devolution) for the
2021-26 to be 41%, which is the same as that for 2020-21. This is less than the 42% share
recommended by the 14th Finance Commission for 2015-20. The adjustment of 1% is to
provide for the newly formed union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh from the
resources of the centre. The criteria for distribution of central taxes among states for 2021-26
period are same as that for 2020-21. They is:
7.14
(a) Income Distance i.e the distance of a state’s income from the state with the highest
income.
(b) Area
(c) Population (2011)
(d) Demographic performance (to reward efforts made by states in controlling their
population)
(e) Forest and ecology:
The introduction of GST, which was rolled out across the country on 1 July 2017, has
significantly changed the state of affairs of financial relations between the centre and states.
The GST subsumes the majority of indirect taxes – excise, services tax, sales tax, octroi (entry
tax). The GST has made India’s indirect tax regime unitary in nature.
The states levy and collect state GST (SGST) and the union levies and collects the central GST
(CGST). For any particular good or service or a combination of the two, the SGST and CGST
rates are equal. An integrated GST (IGST) is applied on inter-state movement of goods and
services and on imports and exports. IGST is simply a combination of SGST and CGST
administered and collected by the union government, kept in a separate account, and
distributed between the union and states after settlement of input tax credit and verification
of the destination of the goods and services. With many taxes subsumed under it, GST
accounts for 35 per cent of the gross tax revenue of the union and around 44 per cent of own
tax revenue of the states.
As per the supreme court verdict in May 2022, the Union and state legislatures have “equal,
simultaneous and unique powers “to make laws on Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the
recommendations of the GST Council are not binding on them.
The GST system replaced the then prevailing production-based taxation system with a
consumption based one. Since the manufacturing states had apprehension about loss of
revenue, it was decided to provide compensation to states for loss of revenue arising on
account of implementation of the Goods and Services Tax for a period of five years from the
date of its implementation. For providing compensation to states, a cess is levied on some
luxury goods and demerit goods and the proceeds are credited to the compensation fund.
GST compensation was extended beyond five years to enable states to tide over the pandemic
induced economic slowdown.
During the five-year transition period, the top five GST compensation-receiving states were
Maharashtra, Karnataka, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, and Punjab. The total amount of compensation
released to the states and union territories during the year 2022 -23 is ` 1,15,662 crore.
In so far as expenditure decentralization is concerned, the central government is entrusted
with the responsibilities of provision of nationally important areas like defence, foreign affairs,
foreign trade and exchange management, money and banking, cross-state transport and
communication. The state governments are entrusted with the responsibility of facilitating
agriculture and industry, providing social sector services such as health and education, police
protection, state roads and infrastructure. The local self governments such as municipalities
and panchayats are entrusted with the responsibility of providing public utility services such
as water supply and sanitation, local roads, electricity etc. For items that fall in the concurrent
list, both central and state governments are responsible for providing services.
Borrowing by the government of India and borrowing by states are defined under Article 292
and 293 of Constitution of India. The centre may borrow within the limits fixed by parliament
by law upon the security of the Consolidated Fund of India or give guarantees within such
limits, if any. The state governments may borrow within the territory of India upon the security
of the Consolidated Fund of the State within such limits, if any, as may from time to time be
fixed by the Legislature of such state by law, or give guarantees within such limits. The centre
may give loans to the states within limits fixed under article 292 and give guarantees in respect
of loans raised by the states. States need to obtain the centre’s consent in order to borrow in
case the state is indebted to the centre over a previous loan.
SUMMARY
Government intervention to direct the functioning of the economy is based on the
belief that the objective of the economic system and the role of government is to
improve the wellbeing of individuals and households.
An economic system should exist to answer the basic questions such as what, how and
for whom to produce and how much resources should be set apart to ensure growth
of productive capacity.
The allocation and distribution functions are primarily microeconomic functions, while
stabilization is a macroeconomic function.
One of the most important functions of an economic system is the optimal or efficient
allocation of scare resources so that the available resources are put to their best use
and no wastages are there.
7.16
Market failures, which hold back the efficient allocation of resources, occur mainly due
to imperfect competition, presence of monopoly power, collectively consumed public
goods, externalities, factor immobility, imperfect information, and inequalities in the
distribution of income and wealth.
Redistribution policies are likely to have efficiency costs or deadweight losses and
therefore redistribution measures should be accomplished with minimal efficiency cost
by carefully balancing equity and efficiency objectives.
A market economy does not automatically generate full employment and price stability
and therefore the governments should pursue deliberate stabilization policies.
Stabilization function is one of the key functions of fiscal policy and aims at eliminating
macroeconomic fluctuations arising from suboptimal allocation.
The stabilization function is concerned with the performance of the aggregate
economy in terms of labour employment and capital utilization, overall output and
income, general price levels, economic growth and balance of international payments.
Government’s stabilization intervention may be through monetary policy as well as
fiscal policy. Monetary policy works through controlling the size of money supply and
interest rate in the economy, while fiscal policy aims at changing aggregate demand
by suitable changes in government spending and taxes.
Fiscal federalism deals with the division of governmental functions and financial
relations among the different levels of government.
The central government should be responsible for the economic stabilization and
income redistribution, but the allocation of resources should be the responsibility of
state and local governments.
Article 246 of the Constitution demarcates the powers of the union and the state by
classifying their powers into 3 lists, namely union list (on which the union parliament
alone can legislate) state list (on which the state legislative assemblies alone can
legislate) and the concurrent list on which both, the parliament and the legislative
assemblies can legislate.
The union government can levy taxes such as tax on income, other than agricultural
income, customs and export duties, excise duties on certain goods, corporation tax,
tax on capital value of assets, excluding agricultural land, terminal taxes, security
transaction tax, Central GST, Union Excise Duty, taxes other than stamp duties etc.
The state governments can levy taxes on agricultural income, lands and buildings,
mineral rights, electricity, vehicles, tolls, professions, as well as collect land revenue,
and impose excise duties on certain items.
Articles 268 to 281 of the constitution contain specific provisions in respect of
distribution of finances among states.
Article 280, provides for an institutional mechanism, namely the Finance Commission,
to facilitate such transfers. It is responsible for evaluating the state of finances of the
union and state governments, recommending the sharing of taxes between them and
laying down the principles determining the distribution of these taxes among States
The Finance Commission considers issues related to vertical equity (deciding about the
share of all states in the revenue collected by centre) and horizontal equity (allocation
among states their share of central revenue).
The Fifteenth Finance Commission recommended the share of states in the central
taxes (vertical devolution) for the 2021-26 to be 41%.
The criteria for distribution of central taxes among states for 2021 -26 are income
distance i.e the distance of a state’s income from the state with the highest
income, area, population (2011), demographic performance (to reward efforts made
by states in controlling their population), forest and ecology and tax and fiscal efforts.
States levy and collect state GST (SGST) and the union levies and collects the central
GST (CGST). An integrated GST (IGST) is applied on inter-state movement of goods and
services and on imports and exports.
For providing compensation to states, a cess is levied on luxury goods and demerit
goods and the proceeds are credited to the compensation fund. GST compensation
was extended beyond five years to enable states to tide over the pandemic induced
economic slowdown.
7.18
The state governments are entrusted with the responsibility of facilitating agriculture
and industry, providing social sector services such as health and education, police
protection, state roads and infrastructure.
The local self governments such as municipalities and panchayats are entrusted with
the responsibility of providing public utility services such as water supply and
sanitation, local roads, electricity etc. For items that fall in the concurrent list, both
central and state governments are responsible for providing services.
(d) They are likely to make the poor people dependent on the rich
(b) Fiscal policy involves the use of price and profit controls; while monetary policy
involves the use of taxation and government spending.
(c) Fiscal policy involves the use of changes in taxation and government spending;
while monetary policy involves the use of changes in the supply of money and
interest rates.
(d) Fiscal policy involves the use of changes in the supply of money and interest rates;
while monetary policy involves the use of changes in taxation and government
spending.
5. The justification for government intervention is best described by
(a) Allocation
(b) Efficiency
(c) Distribution
10. Which of the following is true in respect of centre and state government finances?
(a) The centre can tax agricultural income and mineral rights
(b) Finance commission recommends distribution of taxes between the centre and
states
(c) GST subsumes majority of direct taxes and a few indirect taxes
(c) to the states to compensate for the loss of revenue due to the introduction of GST
(d) to compensate for the loss of input tax credit in manufacturing
12. Which of the following is true in respect of the role of Finance Commissions in India?
I. The distribution between the union and the states of the net proceeds of taxes
II. Allocation between the states of the respective shares of such proceeds.
13. In a federal set up, the stabilization function can be effectively performed by
(d) Parliament
(d) Division of economic functions and resources among different layers of the
government
16. Which one of the following taxes is levied by the state government only?
17. The percentage of share of states in central taxes for the period 2021-26 recommended
by the Fifteenth Finance Commission is
(a) 38 percent
7.22
(b) 41 percent
(c) 42 percent
18. Which of the following is not a criterion for determining distribution of central taxes
among states for 2021-26 period
(a) Demographic performance
(a) The union has greater powers than the states for enacting GST laws
(b) The union and state legislatures have “equal, simultaneous powers “to make laws
on Goods and Services Tax
(c) The union legislature’s enactments will prevail in case of a conflict between those
of union and states
(d) The state legislatures can make rules only with the permission of central
government
20. Providing social sector services such as health and education is
ANSWERS
1. (b) 2. (d) 3. (b) 4. (c) 5. (d) 6. (b)
13. (c) 14. (c) 15. (d) 16. (d) 17. (b) 18. (c)