RK Notes - IPR
RK Notes - IPR
RK Notes - IPR
1
Q3) What is patent?
Ans) A patent is a form of intellectual property that provides its owner with the
legal authority to prevent others from manufacturing, using, or selling an invention
for a specified period of time, given that the invention is disclosed to the public. In
simpler terms, a patent is a right granted by a government to an inventor. This grant
gives the inventor the exclusive privilege to the patented process, design, or invention
for a certain period, in return for a detailed public disclosure of the invention.
Q7) Name some international organizations that play a key role in the protection
and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Ans) There are several international organizations that play a key role in the
protection and enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR):
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO): WIPO is a specialized agency of
the United Nations that is dedicated to developing a balanced and accessible
international intellectual property system.
2
World Trade Organization (WTO): The WTO is an international organization that
deals with the global rules of trade between nations. It administers the Agreement
on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), which sets down
minimum standards for many forms of intellectual property regulation as applied to
nationals of other WTO Members.
These organizations work together to ensure that intellectual property rights are
respected and enforced, promoting innovation and creativity globally.
3
Q11) Define performer under copyright act?
Ans) Under the Copyright Act, a “performer” is defined in Section 2 (qq) and
includes an actor, singer, musician, dancer, acrobat, conjurer, snake charmer, a
person delivering a lecture, or any other person who makes a performance.
Q15) What are the classes of work in which copyright subsists as per section 13
of copy right act?
Ans) As per Section 13 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, copyright subsists
throughout India in the following classes of works:
a) Original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works: This includes novels,
plays, songs, paintings, etc.
b) Cinematograph films: This includes movies and other audiovisual works.
c) Sound recording: This includes recordings of music, spoken words, or other
sounds.
4
Q16) Define an Indian Work under the copyright act 1957?
Ans) Under the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, an “Indian Work” is defined as a
literary, dramatic, or musical work where:
➢ The author of the work is a citizen of India, or
➢ The work is first published in India, or
➢ In the case of an unpublished work, the author, at the time of the making of
the work, is a citizen of India.
Q17) Brief note on copyright societies under copyright act
Ans) A Copyright Society is a legal entity that safeguards the interests of the
owner in the product in which copyright subsists.
It is a registered collective administration society under Section 33 of the Copyright
Act, 1957.
Such a society is formed by authors and other owners. The minimum membership
required for registration of a society is seven.
Copyright societies assure the creative author of the commercial management of
their works. They are authorized to watch out for copyright infringement and take
appropriate legal action against the infringer.
They help in enforcing copyright with benefits to the parties mentioned above.
It also aids copyright owners by increasing their revenues and the general public by
providing them with a convenient destination to obtain licenses from multiple right
holders.
5
c) Legal Compliance: Copyright societies must comply with all relevant laws and
regulations, including those related to copyright and intellectual property.
Q19) Who is the first owner of copyright as per copyright act?
Ans) As per Section 17 of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, the first owner of
copyright is generally the author of the work. However, there are exceptions to
this rule. For instance, in the case of a work made in the course of an author’s
employment under a “contract of service” or apprenticeship, the employer is
considered as the first owner of copyright, in the absence of any agreement to the
contrary.
Q21) Who is author? Explain the concept of author and owner of copyright? What
are the rights of copyright owner?
Ans) In the context of copyright law, an “author” is generally considered to be the
creator of an original work. The specific definition can vary depending on the type
of work and the jurisdiction, but it typically includes the following:
a) In relation to a literary or dramatic work, the author is the person who created
the work.
b) In relation to a musical work, the author is the composer.
c) In relation to an artistic work other than a photograph, the author is the artist.
d) In relation to a photograph, the author is the person who took the photograph.
e) In relation to a cinematograph film or sound recording, the author is the
producer.
f) In relation to any literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work which is computer-
generated, the author is the person who causes the work to be created.
Author and Ownership of Copyright:
It’s important to note that the author of a work is not necessarily the copyright
owner.
If the author creates work for his own, he is the owner of copyright.
If the author creates the work at the instance of another person for valuable
consideration, the person at whose instance the work is done is the owner of
copyright. If the work is done at in the course of employment, the ownership of
copyright depends on the nature of employment.
The copyright can be transferred or assigned to another person or entity, such as
a publisher on which publisher shall become the owner of copyright.
6
Rights of the Copyright Owner
The rights of a copyright owner are quite extensive and serve to protect their
intellectual property. The main rights typically granted to copyright owners:
➢ Right of Reproduction: This allows the copyright owner to make copies of their
work in various forms.
➢ Right to Distribute: The owner can distribute their work in any manner they
choose, including selling or licensing copies.
➢ Right to Create Derivative Works: This enables the owner to make adaptations
or translations of their work.
➢ Moral Rights: These include the right to claim authorship of the work and to
object to any derogatory treatment of it that might harm the author’s
reputation.
These rights are designed to ensure that creators can control how their work is
used and distributed, and that they can receive financial compensation for their
creations. The specifics can vary by jurisdiction, but these principles are widely
recognized in international copyright law.
7
d) Reflective of the Product’s Quality: An ideal trademark should have the potential
to reflect the quality of the product.
Q25) Explain doctrine of honest and concurrent user in trade marks act?
Ans) The doctrine of honest and concurrent use is provided under section 12 of
Indian Trade Marks Act, 1999. This doctrine allows for the registration of a
trademark that is identical or similar to an already registered trademark, under
certain conditions.
The main contention to prove honest concurrent use is that the applicant has been
using the mark in a bonafide manner and/or didn’t know about the earlier registered
trademark.
The main features of this doctrine are:
a) Concurrent use: This is when users have identical or similar marks on similar or
non-similar goods.
b) Honest use: The applicant has been using the mark in good faith and/or didn’t
have the knowledge of the earlier registered trademark.
c) Association with the product or service: The applicant also has the burden to
prove that the relevant customers associate their mark with their product or
service.
d) Discretion of the Registrar: The section also provides that the registration of
such a mark is at the subjective discretion of the Registrar.
8
➢ Duty to Request for Examination: After applying for a patent, the patentee must
request an examination.
➢ Duty to Respond to Objections: If any objections are raised during the
examination of the patent application, the patentee must respond to them.
➢ Duty to clear all Objections: The patentee must address and resolve all objections
to their patent application.
➢ Duty to Pay Statutory Fees: The patentee is responsible for paying all required
fees.
9
Short Notes
10
The term “compulsory license” refers to the grant of permission for an enterprise
seeking to use another’s intellectual property without the consent of its proprietor.
The grant of a compulsory patent license typically requires the sanction of a
governmental entity and provides for compensation to the patent owner.
11
Q5) Copyright is “bundle of rights”, Explain.
Ans) Copyright is often referred to as a “bundle of rights” because it encompasses
several different types of rights that the owner has in relation to the work. These
rights are typically classified into economic rights and moral rights.
A. Economic Rights:
a) The Right of Reproduction: This right allows the copyright owner to control the
reproduction of their work in any material form, including sound and film
recording.
b) The Right of Publication or Communication to Public: This right allows the
copyright owner to control the public display or diffusion of their work.
c) The Right of Performance: This right allows the copyright owner to control and
generate revenues through performances of their work.
d) The Right of Audio-Visual Expression: This right allows the copyright owner to
control the representation of their work in audio-visual format.
e) The Right of Translation and Adaptation: This right allows the copyright owner
to control the translation and adaptation of their work.
B. Moral Rights:
a) The Right to Paternity: This right allows the copyright owner to claim authorship
of the work.
b) The Right to Integrity: This right allows the copyright owner to prevent any
distortion, mutilation or other modification of their work that would be prejudicial
to their honor or reputation.
These rights give the copyright owner the ability to control how their work is
used and distributed, and they provide the legal basis for the owner to seek
compensation if their rights are infringed.
12
Q7) Explain the concept of owner and author of copyright
Ans) Author: In the context of copyright law, an “author” is generally considered
to be the person who creates an original work. This includes the person who writes
a book (for literary works), composes a song (for musical works), or takes a
photograph (for photographic works), among others. The author is the one who uses
their creativity, imagination, and intellectual abilities to create the work.
Owner: The “owner” of a copyright is typically the person who has the legal rights
to the work. This can be the author themselves, or it can be another person or
entity to whom the author has transferred their rights. For example, an author
might sell their copyright to a publisher, in which case the publisher becomes the
owner. The owner has the right to reproduce the work, to distribute it, to display
or perform it publicly, and to create derivative works.
It’s important to note that while the author and owner might often be the same
person, they don’t have to be. The author is always the original creator of the work,
but the owner is the one who holds the legal rights.
13
The primary purpose of a Mareva injunction is to prevent a risk of dissipation of
assets by the defendant for ulterior purposes before judgment. It is designed to
prevent the defendant from rendering a decree against him worthless by removing
his assets from the court’s jurisdiction.
To obtain a Mareva injunction, the plaintiff must usually establish that:
a) There exists a strong prima facie case against the defendant.
b) It will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not issued.
c) The balance of convenience favors the issuing of the injunction.
d) The cause of action lies within the jurisdiction of the Court which the Mareva
injunction is sought.
e) It has a “good arguable case” on the merits of the cause of action.
14
can be detrimental to the business of the original or legitimate owner of the
trademark.
b) Goodwill: The plaintiff has the burden of proving goodwill in its goods or services,
get-up of goods, brand, mark, or the thing standing for itself. Goodwill normally
develops alongside a brand name or brand association.
c) Damage: The misrepresentation must cause damage to the goodwill of the
business.
It’s important to note that passing off does not confer monopoly rights to any
names, marks, get-up, or other indicia. It does not recognize them as property in
its own right. Instead, the law of passing off is designed to prevent
misrepresentation in the course of trade to the public. For example, it prevents a
situation where there is some sort of association between the businesses of two
traders when this is not true.
15
➢ Trademark Search: This step is very crucial before filing for trademark
registration because conducting a detailed search will help a trademark owner to
know whether their trademark is unique and distinct in nature and also check
whether there is any similar or identical mark already existing or not.
➢ Filing an application: After conducting a search, comes the process of filing the
application for registration. The application must be filed in Form TM-A either
online on the IP India's official website or physically at the Trademark Registry
Office according to one's jurisdiction.
➢ Examination Process: Once the application is filed, it will be thoroughly examined
by the Registrar and they will prepare an examination in writing and will send a
copy of it to the applicant within 30 days informing them whether the registrar
wants to refuse or conditionally accept the application and shall also include the
materials by which he came to such a decision. The applicant within 30 days from
receiving the examination report, must file a reply, stating all the defences along
with evidences against the objection raised by the trademark office and the
owner shall put forward the reasons as to why their application should not be
refused and must be proceeded for further registration procedures. If the
applicant fails to reply within the above mentioned time frame, the application
will be abandoned.
➢ Post Examination Procedures: Once the applicant files the reply to the
examination report, the examiner if wants can arrange a hearing if due to any
reason he/she is not satisfied with the reply sent by the applicant or if, the
reply is not able to fulfill the purpose of the objection stated in the report.
After the hearing process, if the examiner is fully satisfied, can accept the
mark and forward it for publication in the Trademark Journal or can refuse the
application if any objection is still there.
➢ Publication of the Trademark Application: After the examiner has accepted the
application, it will be published in the Trademark Journal which will remain there
for 4 months. Advertisement of such an application is done so that within the
time period stated above, any third party can see it and if they want can file
an opposition against the applicant every Monday the Journal is updated with new
accepted trademark applications.
➢ Notice of opposition: within 4 months from the date of publication of the
application, any aggrieved party can file a notice of opposition in Form TM-O,
when any third party feels that their already existing and prior use trademark
has been infringed by the applicant, or the application is made in bad faith and
if such a trademark is registered, it will harm the reputation and good will
associated with the prior trademark of the third party.
Notice of opposition will halt the registration process and the opposed mark of
the applicant according to the Trademark Act, 1999, and the applicant have to
go through certain legal procedures if they wants to continue with the registration
of the same mark, which includes filing a counter- statement, submitting evidence
16
in reference to that counter statement and in some cases it is seen that the
applicant have to go through hearing as well.
➢ Registration: The last step in the registration procedure is to get the certificate
of registration. After the mark goes through all the legal processes related to
the opposition, and if the opposition is cleared, the applicant will receive the
certificate.
17
a) Absolute Grounds for Refusal:
Section 9 deals with absolute grounds for refusal. It specifies the criteria for
determining whether a mark is eligible for registration. Covers aspects such as
distinctiveness, descriptiveness, functionality, and scandalous/offensive nature.
Absolute grounds focus on the inherent qualities of the mark itself and apply
universally. It includes:
➢ Incapability to Distinguish: A trademark cannot be registered if it is incapable
of distinguishing the goods or services of the applicant from those of others.
For instance, a geographical name like “Simla” was deemed unregistrable because
it lacked distinctiveness.
➢ Descriptive or Generic Marks: Marks that describe the kind, quality, origin, or
characteristics of goods/services are ineligible. For example, the term “Rasoi”
(meaning kitchen) could not be registered for edible oils.
➢ Common Usage: If a mark has become common in everyday language or trade
practices, it cannot be registered.
➢ Deceptive Nature: Marks that deceive the public or cause confusion are refused.
This includes marks likely to hurt religious sentiments.
➢ Functional Marks: Marks serving a functional purpose (e.g., necessary product
shapes) are not registrable.
➢ Scandalous or Offensive Marks: Obscene or offensive marks are prohibited.
b) Relative Grounds for Refusal: Section 11 addresses relative grounds for
refusal. Focuses on existing marks and potential conflicts Includes provisions related
to similarity, likelihood of confusion, and well-known marks. These grounds consider
existing marks and potential conflicts:
➢ Similarity to Prior Marks: If a proposed mark is identical or similar to an earlier
registered mark, it may face refusal.
➢ Likelihood of Confusion: Marks causing confusion among consumers due to
similarity are rejected.
➢ Well-Known Marks: If a mark resembles a well-known mark, it may be refused.
➢ Honest Concurrent Use: In exceptional cases, concurrent use of similar marks
may be allowed.
18
b) They safeguard brand reputation, prevent confusion, and maintain exclusivity.
c) Notoriety plays a crucial role in their legal strength.
In short, well-known trademarks are powerful assets that transcend mere
registration and hold immense value in the business world.
Q17) Short note on “ what cannot be patented under Indian Patent Act 1970?”
Ans) Section 3 and Section 4 of the Patent Act deals with the list of exclusions
that are non-patentable. The non-patentable inventions under the Indian Patents
Act, 1970 are as under:
a) Frivolous inventions or those contrary to natural laws (Section 3(a)): An Invention
which is frivolous or which is obvious or which claims anything obvious or contrary
to well established natural law. For example, a machine giving 100% efficiency,
or any machine giving output without an input cannot be considered as obvious
and cannot be patented.
b) Inventions contrary to public order or morality (Section 3(b)): An invention, the
primary or intended use of which would be contrary to law or morality or injurious
to public health This includes inventions that cause serious prejudice to human,
animal or plant life or health, or to the environment. For instance, terminator
gene technology cannot be patented as it severely threatens animal and plant life
and the environment.
c) Mere discovery of a scientific principle or formulation of an abstract theory
(Section 3(c)): Discovering an existing phenomenon like natural gas or an element
cannot be patented.
d) Invention Relating to Atomic Energy: The provisions regarding the patent of
inventions related to atomic energy in India are outlined in Section 4 of the
Patents Act, 1970. This section states that no patent shall be granted for
inventions that are considered by the Central Government to be useful for or
19
related to atomic energy. This includes the production, control, use, or disposal
of atomic energy or any prescribed substance or radioactive substance as defined
under Section 20 of the Atomic Energy Act, 1962.
e) Method of Agriculture or Horticulture: The patent provisions for methods of
agriculture or horticulture in India are specified under Section 3(h) of the Patents
Act, 1970. This section states that a method of agriculture or horticulture is
not an invention within the meaning of the Act and thus, is not patentable. This
exclusion is intended to preserve traditional farming and breeding practices within
the public domain, preventing their exclusive appropriation through the granting
of patents. However, this clause does not encompass all agricultural or
horticultural inventions, allowing for potential patentability in certain cases. For
example, while conventional agricultural methods on open fields are not
patentable, innovations that significantly enhance or modify these methods may
be considered for patent protection if they meet the necessary criteria
f) Mere discovery of a new form of a known substance (Section 3(d)): This does
not result in the enhancement of the known efficacy of that substance. For
example, new uses of the plant neem cannot be patented as per this clause.
g) Substances obtained by a mere admixture (Section 3(e)): This refers to
substances resulting only in the aggregation of the properties of the components.
20
The specifications are submitted in Form-2 as prescribed under the Patent Act,
1970, and the Patent Rules, 2003. The first page of Form-2 should contain the
title of the invention, the name, address, and nationality of each of the applicants,
and a preamble to the description.
For a complete specification, the preamble should state: "The following specification
particularly describes the invention and the manner in which it is to be performed."
Meeting these requirements is essential for the grant of a patent, as the
specification forms the basis of the patent grant and defines the extent of patent
protection.
21
b) Legal Protection: Registration provides better legal protection for action against
infringement, as the registered owner can sue for infringement and seek
remedies such as injunctions, damages, or accounts of profits.
c) Assignment and Licensing: The owner has the right to assign (transfer) the
trademark to another party or license it for use by others.
d) Prevention of Unauthorized Use: The registration empowers the owner to prevent
unauthorized use of the trademark, or a deceptively similar mark, on dissimilar
goods or services if the original mark has a reputation in India.
e) Deterrence of Others: It deters others from using a similar or identical mark
for the same or similar goods or services.
f) Statutory Remedies: Registered trademark holders can seek statutory remedies
against infringement, which are often more convenient than common law
protection.
These rights are crucial for maintaining the integrity of a brand and ensuring
that the goodwill associated with a trademark is not diluted by unauthorized use.
It’s important to note that while registration is not compulsory, it offers significant
advantages and legal protections for the trademark owner.
Q21) Who can oppose patents and what are the grounds for opposing patents? What
is the procedure for opposing patents?
Ans) I) The Grounds for opposition to the grant of Patent (Section 25 (1) to (4)):
Opposition to the grant of patent may be made, once the Controller has accepted
the complete specifications, and it is advertised in the Official Gazette giving
reasons for such acceptance. It is thrown open to the public to oppose the grant,
if there are any reasonable grounds for the same. Within 4 months from the date
of advertisement of the acceptance of the complete specifications, any person
interested, may give notice to the Controller, stating his opposition to the grant of
patent.
"Any Person Interested"
"Person interested" includes a person engaged in, or promoting, research in the same
field as that of the invention.
Thus, he can establish “locus standi” on the following grounds:
i) He has in his possession, patents relating to the same subject matter.
ii) Bona fide manufacturer of an article or based on a similar process as that of the
invention.
iii) Trading interest.
II Grounds for Opposition:
The provisions relating to grounds of opposing patents are given in Section 25 of
Patents Act. An application for a patent may be opposed by any person interested,
on one or more of the following grounds:
a) Invention wrongfully obtained.
22
b) Prior publication in any Indian specification, or prior publication in any other
document in India or elsewhere.
c) Prior claim in a concurrent application.
d) Prior public use or public knowledge in India.
e) Obviousness and Lack of Inventive step.
f) Invention not patentable under the Act.
g) Insufficient description of the invention.
h) Failure to disclose information relating to foreign application.
i) In the case of convention application not made within the prescribed time.
III) The procedure for opposing patents in India involves several steps, and it can
be divided into two types: pre-grant opposition and post-grant opposition.
Pre-Grant Opposition:
a) Filing of Opposition: Any person can file a pre-grant opposition after the
patent application is published but before the patent is granted.
b) Submission of Evidence: The opponent must submit evidence and documents
supporting their opposition.
c) Controller’s Examination: The Controller of Patents examines the opposition and
the applicant’s response.
d) Decision: The Controller decides whether to grant the patent, require
amendments, or refuse the patent application.
Post-Grant Opposition:
a) Filing of Notice: An ‘interested person’ can file a notice of opposition within one
year from the date of publication of the grant of the patent.
b) Constitution of Opposition Board: The Controller constitutes an Opposition
Board consisting of three members to examine the patent.
c) Examination Report: The Opposition Board submits their examination report to
the Controller.
d) Hearing: Both parties are given an opportunity to be heard.
e) Controller’s Decision: Based on the hearing and the Board’s report, the
Controller decides on the opposition.
f) Appeal: Parties dissatisfied with the decision can appeal to the Intellectual
Property Appellate Board (IPAB).
This process ensures that any third party can challenge the validity of a patent
application or a granted patent, maintaining the integrity of the patent system.
23
Situational Problems
Q2) Mr ‘T’ invents a topography of integrated circuits and applies for a patent
for the same. i. ii. Will Mr. ‘T’ succeed in getting a patent? What is the provision
of law regarding the invention of topography of integrated circuits
Mr. ‘T’ may be able to protect his invention of the topography of integrated circuits,
but not through a traditional patent. Instead, this type of intellectual property is
typically protected under a sui generis system, which is a unique category of rights
separate from patents.
24
his layout designs (topographies) of integrated circuits, the design must be original,
resulting from his intellectual effort, and not merely a copy of another layout design.
It should also not have been commercially exploited before. The protection for such
a layout design is usually for a period of 10 years, starting from the date of filing
the application or from the first commercial exploitation, whichever is earlier.
Q3) Being inspired by the Web series ‘Maharani’, Shashi Khanna – a fiction author
wrote a biography of Smt. Rabri Devi named ‘ RANIDEVI’ without her consent. Smt.
Rabri Devi sought an injunction on the sale of the said book. But the controversy
led to heavy public demand of the book. Mohan Trivedi made a pirated copy of this
book and began to sell it all over India. i. What remedies would have been available
to the author, if there was no injunction against his book? ii. What are the remedies
available to Smt. Rabri Devi?
If there was no injunction against Shashi Khanna’s book ‘RANIDEVI’, the author
would have had several remedies available under Indian law for the infringement of
copyright by Mohan Trivedi’s pirated copies:
Remedies for the Author:
a) Civil Remedies: The author could seek damages for the losses incurred due to
piracy. This includes compensatory damages for the loss of sales and profits.
b) Criminal Remedies: The author could file a criminal complaint against the
infringer. Copyright infringement is a criminal offense under the Copyright Act,
1957, which can lead to imprisonment and fines.
c) Administrative Remedies: The author could approach the Copyright Board for
certain administrative actions against the infringer.
Remedies for Smt. Rabri Devi:
a) Right to Privacy: If the biography discloses private facts without consent, Smt.
Rabri Devi could claim a violation of her right to privacy and seek damages.
b) Defamation: If the content of the book is defamatory, she could file a
defamation suit.
c) Injunction: Although an injunction was already sought, if it were not in place,
she could still seek an injunction to prevent further distribution of the book if it
violates her privacy or defames her.
It’s important to note that the remedies would depend on the specifics of the
case, including the nature of the content in the book and the extent of the
infringement or violation of rights.
Q4) In 2003, Famous Camera Ltd. Invents and adopts the trade mark ‘THADAX’
in relation to cameras and obtains registration of the same THADAX. THADAX
becomes a very popular brand in most Asian Countries in a short while. In 2005,
Super Cakes Private Ltd. launches its cakes under the trade name THADAX. (i) (ii)
Can Famous Cameras Ltd. take action against Super Cakes Ltd for restraining Super
25
Cakes Ltd from using the trade mark THADAX ? Can Famous Camera Ltd. Succeed
in the action against Super Cakes Ltd., if the trade mark was popular only in Mumbai?
In the given scenario, Famous Cameras Ltd. has several legal avenues to
address the trademark infringement by Super Cakes Private Ltd.:
a) Action Against Super Cakes Ltd.: Famous Cameras Ltd. can indeed take legal
action against Super Cakes Ltd. for using the trademark ‘THADAX’. The action
can be based on trademark infringement, which occurs when a trademark that is
identical or confusingly similar to a registered trademark is used without
permission, leading to confusion among consumers. Since ‘THADAX’ is registered
for cameras, its use by another company for cakes could potentially dilute the
distinctiveness of the trademark or cause confusion that the cakes are associated
with or endorsed by Famous Cameras Ltd.
b) Success in the Action in Mumbai: The success of Famous Camera Ltd. in the
action against Super Cakes Ltd. would depend on several factors, including the
extent of the reputation of the ‘THADAX’ trademark. If the trademark
‘THADAX’ is well-known in Mumbai and is associated with Famous Cameras Ltd.,
the company may argue that the use of the same trademark by Super Cakes Ltd.
is likely to cause confusion or deception among the public, even if the trademark’s
popularity is limited to Mumbai. The concept of ‘trans-border reputation’ and
‘passing off’ could also be relevant in such cases, where a trademark is well-
known in a particular region and enjoys a reputation.
It’s important to note that the specifics of the case, including evidence of the
trademark’s popularity and consumer confusion, would be crucial in determining the
outcome of any legal action.
Q5) Venugopal is a manufacturer of tennis racquets and wants to use the name
"Rocket" as his trademark. He applies for a trademark registration to the Registrar
of Trademarks.
i. Will Venugopal succeed to register the name "Rocket" as a trademark for his
goods?
ii. State and explain the provisions of the law involved.
Ans) Whether Venugopal will succeed in registering “Rocket” as a trademark for
his tennis racquets depends on several factors. The Trademarks Act, 1999, governs
the registration of trademarks in India and stipulates that a trademark must be
distinctive, not deceptive, and not similar to existing trademarks for related goods
or services. If “Rocket” is deemed distinctive enough and does not conflict with
existing trademarks in the same category, Venugopal may succeed in his application.
The provisions of the law involved are primarily from The Trademarks Act, 1999.
The key provisions that would be considered in Venugopal’s case include:
➢ Section 9: Absolute grounds for refusal of registration, which includes
trademarks that lack distinctiveness or are descriptive of the goods.
26
➢ Section 11: Relative grounds for refusal of registration, which involves refusal
if the trademark conflicts with or is similar to an earlier trademark and may
cause confusion.
➢ Section 18: Application for registration, which outlines the process of applying
for a trademark and the examination by the Registrar.
The Registrar will examine the application to ensure that the trademark “Rocket”
meets the necessary criteria, including distinctiveness and non-conflict with prior
trademarks. If it passes the examination and there’s no opposition, Venugopal may
be granted the registration. It’s advisable for Venugopal to conduct a thorough
trademark search and possibly consult with a trademark attorney to navigate the
registration process effectively.
Q6) Kamya Drugs make a herbal tea for cold and cough treatment using
traditionally well-known actives.
i. Will they be able to get a patent for the herbal tea in India?
ii. What are the steps for filing a patent application in India?
Kamya Drugs may face challenges in obtaining a patent for the herbal tea in India
if the tea is made using traditionally well-known actives. According to Indian patent
law, an invention must be novel, involve an inventive step, and be capable of industrial
application to be patentable. Since the actives are traditionally well-known, they
may not meet the novelty requirement. Additionally, herbal formulations based on
traditional knowledge are generally not considered patentable unless they involve a
new process, formulation, or synergistic effect that is not obvious.
ii. The steps for filing a patent application in India are as follows:
a) Patent Search: Conduct a worldwide patent search to determine the novelty of
the invention.
b) Drafting Patent Specification: Prepare a detailed description of the invention,
including claims that define the scope of the patent sought.
c) Patent Application Filing: File the patent application with the appropriate Indian
Patent Office, either online or at a physical location.
d) Patent Publication: The application is published 18 months after filing to allow
for public opposition.
e) Requesting Patent Examination: After publication, request a substantive
examination of the patent application.
f) Responding to Objections: Address any objections raised by the patent examiner.
g) Patent Grant: If the application meets all requirements, the patent will be
granted.
27
Q7) A film producer makes a cinematographic adaptation of a book without consent
of the author.
i. Is he permitted to do so under the Copyright Act, 1957?
ii. What is copyright infringement?
i. Under the Copyright Act, 1957, a film producer is not permitted to make a
cinematographic adaptation of a book without the consent of the author. The
author’s permission is required to adapt their work into a film, as this constitutes a
‘derivative work’ under copyright law.
ii. Copyright infringement is the use or production of copyright-protected material
without the permission of the copyright holder. This includes any reproduction,
distribution, performance, public display, or creation of derivative works without
authorization. In the context of a film adaptation, if the producer does not have
the rights to the book, any production based on it would be an infringement of the
author’s copyright.
Q8) Scientist 'A' working in B.A.R.C. and involved in atomic energy research,
discovers a scientific principle. His collegue, Scientist 'B' uses the principle and
invents' a novel, inventive, and useful working device based on the principles.
a) Will Scientist 'A' be granted a Patent for his discovery? Why?
Ans) No, Scientist 'A' will not be granted a Patent for his discovery. Under Section
4 of the Patents Act, 1970, inventions relating to atomic energy are not patentable.
Inventions related to atomic energy fall under the non-patentable category in India.
According to Section 4 of the Indian Patents Act, no patent shall be granted for
inventions related to the control, production, disposal, or use of atomic energy.
This includes inventions that the Government of India considers pertinent to atomic
energy operations. The exclusion is in place because the government maintains strict
control over atomic energy due to its strategic importance and potential risks.
b) Will Scientist 'B' be granted a Patent for his invention? Why?
Answer: No, Scientist 'B' will not be granted Patent for his invention, as his
invention is related to the principles of atomic energy which is not patentable.
c) What will be your answer to b) above, if the invention is not related to atomic
energy ? Why?
Answer: In such a case, the Scientist will be granted Patent if his invention is not
related to atomic energy and if his invention is novel and innovative.
Q9) Dr. Singh has written a book on Intellectual Property Law. The book has been
published by Western Law House.
a) Who is the author of the work?
Answer: Dr. Singh is an author of the book on Intellectual Property Law.
28
b) A journalist uses extracts of the book in the review of the book published in a
magazine. Will this amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: No, this will not amount to infringement as extracts can be used for review
purpose, under Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957, certain acts does not amount
to infringement of copyright.
c) A student extensively quotes from Dr. Singh's book in his law examination. Will
this amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: No. this will also not amount to infringement, under Section 52 of the
Copyright Act. 1957, certain acts not to be infringement of copyright.
d) Shyam makes 10 photocopies of the book and distributes them amongst his
friends. Will this amount to infringement? Why?
Answer: Yes, this will certainly amount to infringement, because, under Section 51
of Copyright Act, 1957, making photocopy of the book and distributing the same
amounts to infringement of copyright.
29
Answer: Since the discovery is not the subject matter of the patent, the scientist
can discuss the same at the scientific conference. However, they are advised not
to make any mention of the product, unless they have filed at least a provisional
specification in respect of the invention embodied in the product.
Q11) Dhoni has been granted a patent, by the Indian Patents Office on 31st
December, 2007
a) For how long will Dhoni have the patent over his invention?..
Answer: Under Section 53 (1) of the Act, the term of every patent granted, after
the commencement of the Patents (Amendment) Act, 2002, and the term of the
patent which has not expired and has not deceased to have effect on the date of
such commencement, under this Act, shall be 20 years from the date of filing of
the application for the patent.
b) If Ganguly wants to challenge the patent, in which Court has he to file a suit?
Answer: A suit has to be instituted in a District Court or in appropriate cases, the
High Court.
c) Can Dhoni file an action for infringement against manufacturer who is making the
invention in Nepal? Why?
Answer: No, because, the patent is not registered in Nepal. If Nepal is a convention
country, then only the infringement action can be initiated.
d) Can Dhoni get a patent in England in respect of the same invention, if he applies
in 2008? Why?
Answer: Yes, provided, that no other similar invention has already been granted a
patent.
e) If Dhoni had initially applied under the PCT then, would he have gained any
advantage?
Answer: The advantage would be the crystallizing of the priority date for the same
invention in multiple countries simultaneously.
Q12) A detective agency wants to register the trademark "I Section I Section I"
for its firm. The Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks has refused
to grant trademark on the plea that it sounds similar to the trademark ICICI.
a) Is the stand of the Controller correct?
Answer: Yes, the Controller refusing to grant/register trademark is correct. Under
Section 9 (d) of the Act, there is the 'absolute' ground for refusal, that is, if the
trademark is of such nature as to deceive the public or cause confusion, then the
trademark shali not be registered.
b) Can there be any other ground of refusal ?
Answer: Yes, under Section 11 of the Act,if the trademark is relative in nature
(i.e. 'relative' grounds for refusal. It means (a) if there is likelihood of confusion
caused to the public including the likelihood of association with an earlier trademark
by virtue of its identity with the earlier trademark and similarity of goods or services
30
caused by the earlier trademark, (b) if the earlier trademark is well- known
trademark in India and the later mark would take unfair advantage of the earlier
mark or would be detrimental to the distinctive character or repute of the earlier
trademark.
c) What are the remedies available against the refusal?
Answer: The remedies that the consent of the proprietor is obtained and it is for
honest concurrent use (Section 12 of the act).
Q13) Sanchit and Sagar filed patent application with provisional specification on the
same date for the same invention. After that, Sanchit filed a complete specification
much earlier to Sagar, both filed within the allowed period. Examine the status of
the patent applications filed by both, Sanchit, and Sagar. i) If Sanchit adopted the
idea from Sagar dishonestly.
Answer: If Sanchit adopted the idea from Sagar dishonestly, then it will amount
infringement of Sagar's rights to patent. And hence, Sagar will have right to
institute suit for Declaration, Injunction and also for damages and accounts of
profits.
ii) Both Sanchit and Sagar are honest independent inventors conducting their own
separate experiments.
Answer: As Sanchit has filed a complete Specification much earlier to Sagar; Sanchit
will have exclusive right to make or use the patented article or use of the patented
process. But if Sagar has discovered new process other than Sanchit's experimental
process, Sagar can get patent on his new process; which will be improvement in
Sanchit's patented process, but Sagar have to get consent and permission from
Sanchit, because, Sanchit has filed complete Specification much earlier to Sagar.
So, Sanchit is the exclusive owner (i.e. First Inventor) of patented process.
Q14) ‘A' launches a new hand bag in the market under the brand name "Orange".
The unique feature of this bag is it is made of orange peels with a very innovative
technology and is in shades of orange. 'A' also wants to get the colour Orange as a
trade mark. i. Identify the IPR involved in the given case. ii. Will 'A' be entitled
to use Orange as a trade mark ?
i) The IPR involved in the given situation is Trademark. Trademarks are used to
protect symbols, names, and slogans used to identify goods or services. The
brand name “Orange” and potentially the unique shade of orange used for the
handbags could be registered as trademarks
ii) Regarding the color orange as a trademark, it is possible to trademark a color
if it has acquired distinctiveness and is not functional to the product. In India,
a color can be trademarked under Section 2 (1) of the Trademarks Act of 1999
if it is distinctive and can be graphically represented. However, ‘A’ would need
to prove that the color orange has become distinctive of their handbags in the
eyes of consumers and does not serve a merely decorative or utilitarian purpose.
31
So, ‘A’ may be entitled to use the color orange as a trademark if these conditions
are met and if the color has become associated with their brand in the minds of
consumers.
32