Case Study 1-3 Answers
Case Study 1-3 Answers
Case Study 1-3 Answers
1|Page
The option of a Subsidiary, is an expensive option , however is less
expensive than the option of acquiring a current company that already have
a customer base and is operating. However have some advantages as Ranger
can implement his own way of operating, instead of adapting the acquired
company. The negative aspect, is th they will not take advantage of the local
knowledge as they will in the case of acquiring a company.
Are other options for DFI, as licensing or franchising, however are not
considered DFI, because are normally needed of less foreign investment and
also in this case will not apply as they cannot fit correctly the proposed case.
This strategy could fail, if the countries have rules that foreign companies
cannot settle there a subsidiary directly. This for example happened in
Europe territory, where only for example the US companies that had
previously years to EU creation settlements in the territory can operate. So
what they did was to acquire companies or create subsidiaries, in the
countries that weren't currently art of the EU, but where in the list of
possible countries joining the EU proximately, so they can took advantage
of that.
2|Page
If the British pound’s value is increased, Hull’s expenses are increased,
causing an adverse effect.
This intervention create both positive and negative situation, 5% are not
small amount. If the value of pound will increase 5%, expense will also
increase which would be unfavorable effect for Hull business. Because of
importing company, Hull has been unable to pass on higher cost to its
customer. But it would be favorable for
Hull business, if expense is decrease due to decrease the value of pound by
the Brithish Central bank.
3|Page
c) Assume that both parties agree on counter trade. Why would the
cost of obtaining imports still rise over time for concellos? Would
concellos earn lower profits as a result?
Concellos’ cost of obtaining imports is the cost of producing the chemicals it
uses for exchange (based on the countertrade agreement). Given high
inflation in Brazil, these production costs will rise. However, it may be able
to raise its prices on its final products by the inflation rate to cover its
higher costs of production. Overall, it will be able to offset these higher costs
easier than offsetting the higher costs that would result from exchange rate
effects. Since its competitors base their prices on local cost of production (as
they are not exposed to a weak exchange rate risk), Concellos would now
incur costs that are more similar to those of its competitors.
4|Page