ii

OSCAR S. MORENO
City Mayor

iii
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Grateful acknowledgement is due to the following for their enormous wisdom and support of the
various activities related to the formulation of the City Shelter Plan:

Hon. Caesar Ian E. Acenas, City Vice Mayor and the Honorable Members of the Sangguniang
Panglungsod for their generous support and adoption of the City Shelter Plan;

Mr. Ramon L. Fernandez and the members of the Shelter and Housing Development Task Force for
giving excellent feedback and assistance;

Mr. Christopher E. Rollo, Country Programme Manager, UN-Habitat Philippines whose brilliant
guidance and profound concern have made all the difference;

Mrs. Eva P. Marfil of UN-Habitat, for her generous support and technical assistance in making the
City Shelter Plan substantial and comprehensive and who worked assiduously on behalf of this plan;

Mrs. Grace Ceres B. Saniel, Regional Coordinator, HUDCC-10, for inspiring us and rendering the
necessary technical assistance through the conduct of training workshop and series of writeshops on
the formulation of the City Shelter Plan;

The various Key Players: City Planning and Development Office, City Engineering Office, City
Assessor’s Office, City Social Welfare and Development Office, City Health Office, City Local
Environment and Natural Resources Office, City Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office, Shelter
and Housing Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force, The Presidential Commission for the Urban
Poor-10, UN-Habitat, Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council-10, The Housing
Agencies in Region 10, HDMF, Social Housing Finance Corporation, Housing and Land Use Regulatory
Board, Local Water Services Provider (COWD), Local Power Services Provider (CEPALCO and
MORESCO I) Social Action Center of the Archdiocese of Cagayan de Oro for patience and support
during the many painstaking hours of work that we spent in crafting this plan to fruition;

All of you, knowingly or unknowingly who have inspired and contributed to this plan in some way;
and above all,

GOD, THE ALMIGHTY, Who is the recipient of the largest measure of our appreciation.

Cagayan de Oro City Housing Board

iv
RESOLUTION adopting the City Shelter Plan 2014-2022

v
 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Shelter is basic and fundamental need of man. The Local Government Code of 1991
(Republic Act 7160) and pursuant to its inherent responsibilities and consistent with the Urban
Development and Housing Act of 1992 (Republic Act 7279) transferred more responsibilities of the
National Government to the Local Government as the major implementing bodies on the shelter
needs. For the LGU to implement this mandate a local shelter plan is of paramount importance to
provide a better perspective of housing situation and how the problems focused to housing could be
answered in the most effective process.

The UN-Habitat became instrumental in making the shelter plan substantial and
comprehensive. They coordinated with the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council
(HUDCC) to hold a special Shelter Planning Workshop. They rendered the necessary technical
assistance through workshops on the formulation of the City Shelter Plan.

Objectives

1.1 To acquire / access / develop 658.21 ha. of land for housing and resettlement beginning
2014 until 2022.
1.2 To reduce the doubled-up households (HHs) by no less than 489 units annually.
1.3 To relocate 34,898 displaced HHs from 2014-2022.
1.4 To facilitate the provision of security of tenure to 248 HHs needing upgrading by 2014.
1.5 To upgrade the power facility of 358 HHs by 2014.
1.6 To upgrade or to provide access to potable water to 89 HHs by 2014.
1.7 To upgrade toilet facilities to 3,239 HHs starting 2014-2022.
1.8 To upgrade existing roads or provide access roads to 8,232 HHs starting 2014-2022.
1.9 To upgrade existing drainage system or provide drainage to a total of 10,571 HHs
starting 2020-2022.
1.10 To ensure proper garbage collection and disposal of all HHs.
1.11 To aggressively advocate for structural upgrading of 5,790 dilapidated houses to make it
resilient to hazards brought about by climate change.
1.12 To enforce summary eviction.
1.13 To facilitate access to employment and income generating activities of household
beneficiaries.
2.1 To put in place local policies, local institutions, and mechanisms to implement the
Cagayan de Oro City Shelter Plan.

Target Population

The target population of the City’s shelter plan is mostly the informal settlers occupying
danger areas such as those living along rivers, creeks, landslide-prone areas, no-build zones, affected
by government infrastructure projects, and affected by court order for demolition or eviction. The
number of these households accounts up to 34,898 out of which 24,813 or 71% are those
families/HHs in danger/hazardous areas.

Time Frame

The plan has a time frame of nine years, covering the period 2014 to 2022.This is broken into
three Planning Periods, namely: First Planning Period covering 2014 to 2016; Second Planning Period
covering 2017 to 2019 and the Third Planning Period covering 2020 to 2022.

vi
Vulnerability and Adaptability Assessment

The Vulnerability of the City to Multiple Hazards is one of the main considerations of this
plan. Sensitivity Analysis and Vulnerability Adaptation Assessment (VAA) of the city were also
considered. Flooding scored the highest threat level to the city; hence it has greater vulnerability
impact to the communities compared to the rest of the hazards.

Geographic Location and Features

Cagayan de Oro City is geographically located at the central coast of Northern Mindanao;
Philippines. It is bounded by Macajalar Bay on the North and the mountains of Bukidnon, Lanao del
Norte to the South, Municipality of Opol to the West and Municipality of Tagoloan to the East.
It has a land area of 57,851 hectares, the largest City in Northern Mindanao with territorial
size of 2.82% of the region and 16.20% of Misamis Oriental (357.010 has.)It has 80 Barangays and
geographically referenced as First District (West Area) and Second District (East Area).

Income Generation

The City of Cagayan de Oro gets its income and other revenue from the following: taxes,
fees, permits and licenses, business and services, subsidies from the National Government and other
sources allowed by law. In 2011 the total revenue generated amounted to Php 1,719,874,752.98.
The biggest source of income is the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) of Php 902,306,610.00 which is
about 52.46%.

Current Housing Situation

The City Shelter Plan covers a nine–year period, commencing on 2014 up to 2022. In
assessing the housing situation, baseline data used were taken from the 2010 census on Population
of the NSO. The rest of the figures were projected based on the trends on population from 2000 and
2010 Census.

Cagayan de Oro City built up areas includes residential, commercial, industrial and
institutional areas as well as parks and open spaces which constitutes approximately 11,977.10
hectares or 20.70% of the total land area of 57,851 hectares.

A total of 133,366 occupied housing units were recorded in Cagayan de Oro City in 2010.
This translates to a ratio of 103 households for every 100 occupied housing units, with 4.5 persons
per occupied housing units. In 2000, there were 103 households per 100 occupied housing units,
and 5.1 persons per occupied housing unit.

Power distribution utilities are answered by two legitimate power providers namely Cagayan
de Oro Electric Power and Light Company (CEPALCO) and Misamis Oriental Electric Service
Cooperative (MORESCO). These power providers have efficiently supplied the needs of both the
urban and rural barangays in the City.

The Cagayan de Oro Water District (COWD) provides potable water in almost all parts of the
rural and urban barangays. It has sufficiently provided the demands of the City. The annual capacity
of COWD by 2014 is projected at 546, 692, which is more than enough to provide the needs of new
units.

vii
 The most dominant problem that needs to be addressed is the poor drainage system around
the City, which results to flooding. Presence of debris or barrier, which interferes with flows of
canals and rivers, should be addressed. Massive widening of current drainage canals and declogging
is needed.

Base on RA 9003, The Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, the City thru CLENRO
continue on its Information, Education Campaign on Waste Segregation to all barangay level.
Material Recovery Facility (MRF) will be then constructed in the barangay as mandated in this act.
Fifty percent reduction of solid waste is expected to be realized.

Majority of the lands in urban and rural areas that are occupied by the informal settlers are
owned by few rich individuals or families in Cagayan de Oro City. Some of the LGU-owned lands and
public lands are also occupied by the Informal Settlers Families (ISFs).

The ISFs is estimated to be 46,062 and a total of 34,898 households are prioritized and or
needing relocation.

The planners decided to prioritize the displaced units over the doubled up households in
terms of provision of shelter since their location demands urgency due to the dangers posed by
various hazards, both natural and legal. Thus the addressing of the shelter needs of these displaced
units immediately starts depending on the availability of units. Doubled up households will be
attended as case-to-case basis only.

New Units Needed due to Backlog and Population Growth

A total of 79,073 new units are needed due to backlog and population growth for the entire
nine-year planning period covering 2014-2022.

Upgrading Needs

The upgrading needs cover three main categories of needs; tenure upgrading need,
infrastructure upgrading need and structural upgrading need.

Tenurial Upgrading Need

A total of 248 HHs needing tenurial need. The City plans to upgrade the status of these HHs
by 2014 through different schemes such as the Community Mortgage Program, direct purchase
scheme and other similar programs.

Infrastructure Upgrading Need

Since units with readily available power distribution line provided by legitimate power
providers is considered as adequate power supply, the number of households needing electrical
upgrading is only 358 HHs.

Safe drinking water supply and a safer environment has been established in the City due to
the presence of an efficient water supply. The city plans to assist 89 HHs in upgrading the access to
potable water supply from the local water district or through a communal government installed
deep wells.

viii
 Adequate sanitary facility is vital in uplifting the health and environment of the City. It has
been known that sanitary facilities in blighted areas are in need of improvement. A total of 3,239
HHs needs assistance from the government to upgrade their sanitary facility.

The need for upgrading of drainage facilities is synonymous to that of the need for road
access. The planners considered the assumption that as roads are built the implementation of a
sufficient and efficient drainage system is also considered. Thus the number of HHs needing upgrade
of drainage system is totalled as 10,571.

Structural Upgrading Need

The structural Upgrading Need refers to the need to improve or repair structures or dwelling
units so as to make it resilient to the effects of climate change. It covers makeshift houses,
dilapidated structures and structures needing major repair. The number of structures needing such
improvement amounts to 4.05% of the housing stock for the base year (2013) is computed to be
142,966. Four and 5/100 percent of which is 5,790. Regular monitoring or inspection of the office of
the building official will be conducted to ensure the safety and resiliency of the structures.

Affordability of Households for Housing

The planners categorized into six income groups the target households for housing according
to their affordability to pay for the housing facility. Assumptions were drawn in assigning the income
groupings. Of the six income groups, only the first three income groups are considered as
beneficiaries. They have a typical monthly income of 30,000 and below.

Housing Options

For the 1st income group, Option A is recommended. The housing component is a Row
House. The land development is fully subsidized by the local government unit to meet the
affordability of the target income group. For the 2nd income group, Option B is recommended. It is a
Single Attached building. For the 3rd income group, Option C is recommended. Housing component
is Single Detached. For the 4th – 6th income group, the affordable housing options include the duplex
type and the Medium Rise Building (MRB).

Assessment of Resources for Shelter Provision

The needs of those belonging to the 1st to 3rd income groups, which total to 452.01 hectares
or about 62.50% of the total land available , will be the priority of the Local Government. The land is
sufficient for the target potential beneficiaries.

Based on the assessment, the service providers of Power, Water, Roads, Drainage, and
garbage disposal can sufficiently respond to the needs within the planning period.

Finance Requirements for Housing

For a nine year period, the City of Cagayan de Oro has to mobilize around Php26 billion
pesos to finance the housing programs intended for the various income groups.

ix
Potential Sources of Funds for Shelter Provision

The potential sources of funds for shelter provision which the City can tap for its housing
projects include: The National Housing Authority (NHA), Home Development Mutual Fund
(HDMF/Pag-ibig), SHFC, DBP, Land Bank, Private Developers (including balanced housing per RA
7279), Private Developers, Micro Financing Institutions, Foreign Funds, Tax on Idle Lands and
Housing Collections/reflows.

Work and Financial Plan

To realize the goals of the City Shelter Plan, a Work and Financial Plan was formulated based
on the shelter needs that surfaced during the Local Shelter Plan Workshop sponsored by the UN
Habitat, in cooperation with the Housing and Urban Development Council (HUDCC). It needs a varied
source of funds for its preparation, implementation and monitoring for the planning period 2014-
2022.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation will enable the Decision Makers as well as the Cagayan de Oro
Housing Board (CdeOHB) to determine the progress of the implementation of the City Shelter Plan
and make timely decision to ensure that progress is maintained according to schedules and targets.

The City Planning and Development Office shall be primarily responsible in carrying out data
gathering and analysis and submit quarterly report to the CdeOHB.

The CdeOHB shall submit an annual evaluation report and recommendations to the Local Chief
Executive of the status of the City Shelter Plan.

x
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Title Page i
Message of the LCE iii
Acknowledgement iv
Sangguniang Panlungsod Resolution v
Executive Summary vi
Table of Contents xi
List of Figures xii
List of Tables xiii
List of Acronyms xiv
Preface xv
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION
Rationale 1-1
Vision, Goals, and Objectives 1-1
Target Population 1-2
Shelter Planning Process 1-3
Key Players, Roles & Responsibilities
The Process
Structure and Timeframe of the Shelter Plan
Chapter 2. CITY/MUNICIPALITY OVERVIEW
Geographic Location & features 2-2
Location 2-2
Climate 2-4
Topography & Soils 2-5
Vulnerability to Multiple-hazards 2-6
Urban Development Trends 2-8
Population Size & Structure 2-9
Migration Trend 2-11
Income and Poverty Incidence 2-12
Labor Force 2-12
Employment 2-12
Existing and Proposed Land Use 2-12
Existing and Proposed Infrastructure 2-14
Organizations, Institutions & Governance 2-17
Local Economic Outlook 2-18
Income Class of LGU
Annual Income (local revenue & IRA) 2-18
Major Economic Activities 2-19
Chapter 3. ASSESSMENT OF SHELTER NEED
Definition of Terms 3-1
Basic Data & Assumptions 3-2
Current Housing Situation 3-4
Backlog 3-9
Future Need 3-18
Upgrading Needs 3-20
Tenure Upgrading Need 3-20
Infrastructure Upgrading Need 3-21
Structural Upgrading Need 3-25
Chapter 4. ASSESSMENT OF AFFORDABILITY
Assessment of Affordability 4-1
Affordable Housing Options 4-4

xi
Chapter 5. ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES FOR SHELTER PROVISION
Land 5-1
Infrastructure 5-5
Power 5-5
Water 5-6
Sanitation 5-7
Roads 5-8
Drainage 5-9
Garbage Disposal System & Services 5-9
Housing Finance 5-10
Chapter 6. WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN 6-1
Chapter 7. MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 7-1

ANNEXES

1. Location and Number of Affected Families/Households -1-

2. Worksheets on Housing Needs Calculation -19-
3. Affordable Housing Options/ Designs -20-
4. Table of Annuity Factor -25-
5. The Technical Working Group -26-
6. The Different Relocation Sites of the City -31-

GLOSSARY
REFERENCES

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1.1 Households Needing Relocation 1-2

Figure 1.2 The Technical Working Group of Cagayan de Oro City and Key 1-3
Players during the Local Shelter Planning Workshop on September 3-6,
2013 at N- Hotel
Figure 1.3 Flow Chart of the LSP Planning Process 1-7
Figure 2.1 Map of the Philippines, Region 10, Misamis Oriental and 2-2
Cagayan de Oro City
Figure 2.2 Monthly Average Temperature (1981-2010) 2-4
Figure 2.3 Average Monthly Rainfall and No. of Rainy Days, Cagayan de 2-5
Oro (1981-2010)
Figure 2.4 Various Rivers and Creeks of Cagayan de Oro 2-6
Figure 2.5 The Geohazard Map 2-7
Figure 2.6 Population Growth Patterns of Cagayan de Oro City, Region X, 2-8
Philippines, 1970-2010
Figure 2.7 Age-Sex Pyramid of the Household Population, 2010 2-9
Figure 2.8 General Existing Landuse Map 2-13
Figure 2.9 Proposed General Land Use Map 2-14
Figure 2.10 The Location Map of the Sanitary Landfill 2-15
Figure 3.1 Absence of Drainage System in Balubal Socialized Housing 3-8
Project

xii
 LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1 Number of HHs Needing Relocation 1-2
Table 2.1 Land Area by Barangay, 2010 2-3
Table 2.2 Average Rating per Adaptive Capacity Dimension 2-7
Table 2.3 Land Area, Population, Population Density and Number of 2-9
Households by Barangay, 2010
Table 2.4 Labor Force Population, 2010 Cagayan de Oro City 2-12
Table 2.5 Existing Land Use (2000-2012) 2-13
Table 2.6 Proposed General Land Use 2-14
Table 2.7 Schedule of Flights of Laguindingan Airport, 2013 2-16
Table 2.8 Income Generation by Source for the last Three Years (2009- 2-19
2011), Cagayan de Oro City
Table 3.1 Proposed Urban Land Use of the City 3-5
Table 3.2 Land Area and Lots Generated by Housing Category per 3-5
approved Complex Subdivision Applications from 2009-2013
Table 3.3 Occupied Housing Units by Construction Materials of the Roof 3-6
and Outer Walls: Cagayan de Oro City, 2010
Table 3.4 Households by Tenure Status of the Lot 3-7
Table 3.5 Number of Households by Type of Toilet Facilities 3-7
Table 3.6 Number of HHs by Usual Manner of Garbage Disposal, 2010 3-8
Table 3.7 Number of HHs served by the City Garbage Collection 3-9
Table 3.8 Summary of New Units Needed due to Backlog 3-9
Table 3.9 Number of Units Needed Annually Due to Backlog 3-10
Table 3.10 Population Projection 3-19
Table 3.11 New units needed due to Future Need (population growth) 3-19
Table 3.12 New Units Needed Due to Backlog and Population Growth per 3-19
Planning Period
Table 3.13 Total new units needed annually due to backlog and population 3-20
growth
Table 3.14 Upgrading Needs: Tenure 3-20
Table 3.15 Upgrading Needs: Power 3-21
Table 3.16 Upgrading Needs: Water 3-21
Table 3.17 Upgrading Needs: Sanitary Facility 3-21
Table 3.18 Upgrading Needs: Road Access 3-24
Table 3.19 Upgrading Needs: Drainage Facilities 3-24
Table 3.20 Upgrading Needs: Structural Upgrading 3-25
Table 4.1 Affordability Analysis and Land Need Calculation 4-3
Table 4.2 Affordable Housing Options 4-5
Table 5.1 Lands Available and Suitable for Housing (as of 2014) 5-1
Table 5.2 Comparison of Land Available and Land Requirement 5-5
Table 5.3 Assessment of Power Need vs. Capacity of Power Provider 5-6
Table 5.4 Assessment of Potable Water Need vs. Capacity of Water 5-7
Provider
Table 5.5 Assessment of Need for Toilet Facility vs. Capacity of Service 5-8
Provider
Table 5.6 Assessment of Need for Roads vs. Capacity of Service Provider 5-8
Table 5.7 Assessment of Need for Drainage vs. Capacity of Service 5-9
Provider
Table 5.8. Financial Requirements Needed for New Housing 5-10
Table 5.9 Potential Sources of Funds for Shelter Provision 5-10
Table 6.1 Work and Financial Plan 6-2

xiii
 LIST OF ACRONYMS

o ASUD – Attaining Sustainable Urban Development

o CC VAA – Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptability Assessment
o CdeO – Cagayan de Oro
o CEPALCO – Cagayan Electric Power and Light Company, Inc.
o MORESCO 1 – Misamis Oriental Electric Cooperative, Inc.
o CHO – City Health Office
o CLUP – Comprehensive Land Use Plan
o DENR – Department of Environment and Natural Resources
o DPWH – Department of Public Works and Highways
o FIES – Family Income and Expenditure Survey
o GK – Gawad Kalinga
o HDMF – Home Development Mutual Fund
o HH – Household
o HUDCC – Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council
o IRA – Internal Revenue Allotment
o ISF – Informal Settler Families
o LCE – Local Chief Executive
o LCMP – Local Community Mortgage Program
o LGU – Local Government Unit
o LSP – Local Shelter Plan
o NHA – National Housing Authority
o NGA – Non- Government Agencies
o NGO – Non-Government Organizations
o NSO – National Statistics Office
o PPA – Programs, Projects and Activities
o COWD – Cagayan de Oro Water District
o SHFC – Social Housing Finance Corporation

xiv
 PREFACE

Over the years, the City government has provided support to various development
programs and projects that contributed to the region’s economic growth. Among these are
road network improvements, job generations through business investment, tourism
development, and one of the top priority program of the administration is Shelter and
Housing Development in response to the challenging issues surrounding shelter provision
and urbanization. Its commitment is visibly felt in creating the City Housing Board through
Executive Order no.039-13 and the Shelter and Housing Development Multi-Sectoral Task
Force through Executive Order no. 020-13.

The Organic Act on Housing and Development transferred more responsibilities to

the local government. Shelter and Housing Development takes a lot of more commitment, a
collaborative effort of the government and private sectors. To bring to fore the need to
address this mandate, a local shelter plan is of foremost importance.

The City Shelter Plan is a vital document that gives information on how the present
housing situation could be answered and met. It identifies housing problems; upgrade
future housing needs, housing affordability, housing designs and local resources such as
land and local provision of basic sources, logistics and the monitoring and evaluation of the
plan.

It provides effective consideration among the various agencies of the government

concerned in the delivery of housing needs of the informal and formal sectors, renters,
government employees and those availing of either socialized or economic housing. This
foresight of the local government and the complimentary efforts of the private sector will
strengthen further the growth of the economy in this part of Mindanao.

xv
 Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

Rationale

Cagayan de Oro is a highly urbanized city that serves as a regional center and business
hub in Northern Mindanao. As envisioned, it is the gateway of Northern Mindanao and
Transhipment Hub as well. The City is also known as the melting pot in this part of the region
because of its business growth accessibility, attractions and foremost, it’s warm and kind-
hearted people. The place’s great attractions include modern medical, educational and financial
centers; complete high quality facilities, utilities and services; and numerous mega shopping
malls.

With all these developments and sound economy, it is expected that these will result to
the improvement of the quality of the life of the people especially the poor and underprivileged.
Population growth due to immigration and lack of family planning or birth spacing, however,
puts a strain on the economy and resources. More people compete on the limited Earth’s
resources, which is already too much for the environment to bear. This nature’s degradation is
further aggravated by climate change. The memory of Typhoon Sendong is still fresh in the
minds of the Cagay-anons where hundreds of people died and hundreds of thousands of
properties and livelihoods were lost.

This phenomenon drains the service delivery capacity of the city particularly, the
housing supply, thus resulting to housing shortage.

The City Government is very much aware of its responsibilities in facing these
challenges. The formulation of its City Shelter Plan in consonance with the Urban Development
and Housing Act (RA 7279) is very timely since it is a master plan that will address the pressing
housing issues. There is now a need for all stakeholders to proceed towards this direction and
formulate concrete plans to build secured, peaceful and resilient communities for the present as
well as for the future generation.

Vision

A city managed through good governance, empowering its citizenry to thrive in a highly
competitive economy and a sustainable environment nurturing its diversity and multi-cultural
heritage towards a resilient, progressive and inclusive future.

Goals

1. The upliftment of socio-economic condition by empowering the citizenry for a safe,

healthy and secured community integrating the principles of DRR-CCA.
2. The rationalization and institutionalization of shelter/housing office.

Objectives

1.1 To acquire / access / develop 658.21 ha. of land for housing and resettlement
beginning 2014 until 2022.

1-1
 1.2 To reduce the doubled-up households (HHs) by no less than 489 units annually.
1.3 To relocate 34,898 displaced HHs from 2014-2022.
1.4 To facilitate the provision of security of tenure to 248 HHs needing upgrading by
2014.
1.5 To upgrade the power facility of 358 HHs by 2014.
1.6 To upgrade or to provide access to potable water to 89 HHs by 2014.
1.7 To upgrade toilet facilities to 3,239 HHs starting 2014-2022.
1.8 To upgrade existing roads or provide access roads to 8,232 HHs starting 2014-2022.
1.9 To upgrade existing drainage system or provide drainage to a total of 10,571 HHs
starting 2020-2022.
1.10 To ensure proper garbage collection and disposal of all HHs.
1.11 To aggressively advocate for structural upgrading of 5,790 dilapidated houses to
make it resilient to hazards brought about by climate change.
1.12 To enforce summary eviction.
1.13 To facilitate access to employment and income generating activities of household
beneficiaries.
2.1 To put in place local policies, local institutions, and mechanisms to implement the
Cagayan de Oro City Shelter Plan.

Target Population

The target population of the City’s shelter plan are mostly the informal settlers
occupying danger zone areas such as those living along rivers, creeks, landslide-prone areas, no-
build zone, affected by government infrastructure projects, and affected by court order for
demolition or eviction. The number of these households accounts up to 34,898. The households
with monthly income below Php 30,000 and doubled up households and the population increase
are also considered in this plan.

The table below shows the number of households and their respective circumstance
that are targeted for assistance by the shelter plan. The succeeding figure shows the graphical
illustration of the said households.

Table 1.1 Number of HHs Needing Relocation

1. Families / HHS in danger / hazardous areas
· Riverside 2,926
· Creekside 540
· Along the road 295
· Hillside 652
· Drainage 70
· Seaside / Coastal Area 811
· Landslide prone (high risk) 3,704
· Sendong victims (unserved) 15,815
Subtotal 24,813
2. Families / HHS to be affected by infrastructure projects 1,176

3. Those not affected by 1 & 2 but with court order for demolition/eviction 5,457
4. Those not affected by 1, 2 & 3 but with pending or threats of demolition
3,452
/eviction
HHs NEEDING RELOCATION 34,898

1-2
 Figure 1.1 Households Needing Relocation

Shelter Planning Process

Key players their roles and responsibilities. The key personnel and their respective
involvement or roles in the crafting of the City Shelter Plan are enumerated below:

a. Local Chief Executive

The City Mayor was the one who approved the holding of the various activities
related to the formulation of the City Shelter Plan. He created the Shelter and Housing
Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force through Executive Order No. 020-13 and the
Cagayan de Oro Housing Board through Executive Order No. 039-13 to provide a better
perspective of housing situation and how the problems focused to housing could be
answered and met. All budgets related to the shelter plan preparation were disbursed
upon approval of the City Mayor. During the presentation of the draft of the shelter
plan, he gave his insights and reactions as part of the assessment of the whole plan.

b. Sangguniang Panlungsod

The shelter plan prepared by the Technical Working Group (TWG) composed of
the City Planning and Development Office, City Engineering Office and Shelter and
Housing Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force will be presented to the Housing Board
for review and approval and for possible issuance of a City Council Ordinance approving
and adopting the said shelter plan.

1-3
Figure 1.2 The Technical Working Group of Cagayan de Oro City and Key Players during the Local
Shelter Planning Workshop on September 3-6, 2013 at N- Hotel
Source: HUDCC

c. LGU Offices/Departments

· City Planning and Development Office and Estate Management Division –

provided basic socio-economic data and technical plans.
· City Engineering Office – provided technical plans for infrastructure
development.
· City Assessor’s Office – provided data and analysis regarding inventory of lands
available for housing, its location and price.
· City Social Welfare and Development Office – provided information regarding
status of social services and validated some data used in the planning.
· City Health Office – provided data status of sanitation.
· City Local Environment and Natural Resources Office – provided data on garbage
collection and environment related information with impact on housing.
· City Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office – provided data on location of
disaster prone areas and estimated number of affected families and also the
designated evacuation centers, proposed evacuation centers and related
disaster preparedness activities.
· Shelter and Housing Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force – provided data and
estimated number of beneficiaries to be relocated.
· Office of the City Building Official – participated on the preparation of affordable
housing design.

d. Private Sector/NGOs/POs

· Local Water Services Provider (COWD) – provided information regarding water

utilization in the residential area in Cagayan de Oro City.
· Local Power Services Provider (CEPALCO and MORESCO I) – assisted the City
Engineering Office in providing information on power supply and demand in
residential areas.

1-4
 · Social Housing Finance Corporation (SHFC) – provided information regarding
loan package of the homeowners association.
· Social Action Center of the Archdiocese of CdeO– provided information
regarding the management of Community Mortgage Program (CMP).

e. Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP)

PCUP provided information regarding data on households and areas affected by

court order or writ of demolition and other information regarding urban poor issues.

f. UN-HABITAT

The UN-Habitat became instrumental in making the shelter plan substantial and
comprehensive. They coordinated with Housing and Urban Development Coordinating
Council to hold a special Shelter Planning Workshop for Cagayan de Oro City that is the
first LGU under ASUD Project wherein Vulnerability and Adaptability Assessment was
given consideration in shelter planning.

g. HUDCC Region X

The Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC) Region X

rendered the necessary technical assistance through the conduct of training workshop
and write shop on the formulation of the City Shelter Plan (CSP).

h. The Housing Agencies in Region X

The National Housing Authority gave an extensive orientation on their various

programs and assistance that the LGU can avail. These are in the form of technical
assistance and financing through loans and grants through their office; Pag-IBIG Fund
and Social Housing Finance Corporation (SHFC); and technical and policy guidance from
the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB).

The process. The following are the processes involved in the preparation of the local shelter
plan:

1. Data Gathering and Validation. There were different sources of data that were
gathered for the purpose of shelter planning. Consolidated and validated data regarding
the Informal Settlers Families (ISFs) from the City Planning and Development Office and
Estate Management Division, City Engineering Office, City Assessor’s Office, City Social
Welfare and Development Office, City Health Office, City Local Environment and Natural
Resources Office, City Disaster Risk Reduction Management Office, Shelter and Housing
Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force, City Building Office, Local Water Services
Provider (COWD), Local Power Services Provider (CEPALCO and MORESCO I), Community
Mortgage Program, Social Action Center of St. Augustine Cathedral Parish were also the
source of the other data used in this plan.

With the inclusion of Cagayan de Oro City to the UN Habitat’s Achieving

Sustainable Urban Development (ASUD) Programme, a rapid Climate Change and
Vulnerability Adaptation and Assessment (CCVAA) were considered in drafting the
shelter plan.

1-5
2. Situational Analysis. The data that were gathered were analysed and used in
analysing local housing situation, especially in the classification of ISFs based on their
socio-economic status (income groupings), location and urgency of need for shelter and
basic services. Through this process the planners were able to dissect the needs of the
ISFs both related and non-related to shelter. Likewise, the capacity of the LGU to
correspond to the identified needs was analysed. The planners were able to identify
gaps on resources in all aspects e.g. available lots, infrastructure and shelter related
basic services, government and non-government programs, systems and funds.

3. Formulation of Goals and Objectives. Base on the analysis, the vision of the City
Government of Cagayan de Oro was validated and was made an integral part of the
shelter plan. Goals anchored on the vision were formulated with focus on the shelter
sector. Objectives were specially stated towards achieving the goals.

4. Generation of Shelter Strategies. The goals provided the planners the take-off point in
designing various strategies that are spelled-out in terms of programs and activities in
the plan.

5. Laying out of Implementation Plan. Work plan defining the objectives, strategies,
programs/projects/activities, responsible agencies, resources needed and the time
frame was laid-out. This will be used as bases in implementing the plan assuming all
aspects are given consideration.

Implementation of the plan. The shelter plan shall be implemented based on all
strategies, programs and project indicated in the work and financial plan.

6. Designing the Monitoring and Evaluation System. In order to determine and measure
the effectivity of the plan, a monitoring and evaluation system was designed.

7. Monitoring and Evaluation. Periodical Monitoring shall be conducted in order to gauge

its degree of implementation and its effect to the shelter needs of the city as a whole. All
identified gaps, issues and problems that were not considered in the approved Shelter
Plan shall be recommended for inclusion in the plan.

1-6
Figure 1.3 Flow Chart of the LSP Planning Process

Availability

1-7
Structure and Timeframe of the Shelter Plan

Structure. The Cagayan de Oro Housing Board will recommend to the Sangguniang
Panlungsod for the approval and adoption of the shelter plan. The Shelter and Housing
Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force/Estate Management Division of CPDO will be
capacitated in terms of manpower and technical skills to implement the plan leading towards
the realization of the goals and objectives of the CSP. All these will be translated by the Local
Chief Executive into an appropriate ordinance.

Time Frame. The plan has a time frame of nine years, covering the period 2014 to 2022.
This is broken down into three Planning Periods, namely:

First planning period covering 2014 to 2016

Second planning period covering 2017 to 2019
Third planning period covering 2020 to 2022

1-8
 Chapter 2

CITY OVERVIEW

Brief History

The City’s history dates back many centuries before the Spaniards came to Cagayan de Oro when
the territory was called Kalambagohan. Its main town, Himologan, was a hilltop fortress situated
some eight kilometers south of the present Poblacion.

1622 – The first Spanish missionaries came and at that time the people of Cagayan had a
tributary relation to Kudarat, the Muslim Sultan of Maguindanao Empire in Cotabato. Yet
the people had not embraced Islam. Instead, many became Christian. Because of this,
Muslim warriors began to attack the settlement. As a defense strategy, the priests
persuaded the people to transfer from the hilltop to a better location, which is the
present site of the Saint Augustine Cathedral. The Cagayanons were able to defend
themselves for almost 250 years from the Muslim harassment.

1738 – Spanish dominance was felt in Cagayan.

1818 – Misamis gained status of a province; bone of its four districts was the Partidos de
Cagayan.

1871 – The “Partidos” became a town and was made permanent capital of Misamis.

1883 – The town became seat of the Spanish government in Mindanao for the provinces of
Misamis Oriental, Misamis Occidental, Bukidnon, Lanao del Norte and Zamboanga del
Norte. Consequently, from a purely farming-fishing area, Cagayan emerged into a
booming commerce and trade center.

1898 – The war years in Cagayan were prompted by the presence of the Americans.

1900 – (June 4) the local forces led by Major Apolinar Velez at the historic battle of Macahambus
initially and successfully repulsed The Americans.

1928 – After the troubled years, peace finally brought back the economic activities to normal but
under the tutelage of Americans. St. Augustine School, the forerunner of the present
Xavier University and of Lourdes College, was inaugurated.

1950 – (June 15) President Elpidio Quirino signed Republic Act No. 521 which granted the status
of chartered city to the municipality of Cagayan de Oro.

1950 – Present – Following these events, the socio-economic order underwent some far-
reaching changes. Activities grew in scale and importance until it develops as the
convention center for the entire Northern Mindanao (Region X).

1983 – Cagayan de Oro was then declared as a highly urbanized city by the Ministry of Local
Government through the efforts of then Congressman Emmanuel Pelaez.

2-1
Today, Cagayan de Oro is one of the fastest growing cities in the country, envisioned to be the
Metropolitan capital of Northern Mindanao where business, trade, financial, educational and
medical services thrive and where people live in harmony with nature.

Geographic Location and Features

Location. Cagayan de Oro City (CdeO) is geographically located at the central coast of Northern
Mindanao, Philippines. It is bounded by Macajalar Bay on the north and the mountains of
Bukidnon, Lanao del Norte to the South, Municipality of Opol to the West and Municipality of
Tagoloan to the East. The city lies between the latitude 8°-14’-00” to 8°-31’-5” North and
longitude 124°-27’-00” and 129°-49’-00” East.

The Figure 2.1 below shows the location of Cagayan de Oro City. It is located along the central
coast of Northern Mindanao region, Island of Mindanao, the second largest island of the
Archipelago of the Philippines.

Its distance from Metro Manila is 810 air kilometers. It can be reached within an hour and
fifteen minutes by plane and 36 hours by ship.

Figure 2.1 Map of the Philippines, Region 10, Misamis Oriental and Cagayan de Oro City

Source: NSCB

Cagayan de Oro, the largest City in Northern Mindanao, has an area of 57,851 hectares. Its
territorial size is 2.82% of the region and 16.20% of Misamis Oriental (357.010 has.).

Cagayan de Oro is politically subdivided into 80 barangays. These barangays are grouped into
two Congressional Districts by the Republic Act No. 9371 and is referenced according to its
geographic factors: First District (West Area) and Second District (East Area).

The First District with a total land area of 43,637.40 hectares comprises 24 barangays, which are
Baikingon, Balulang, Bayabas, Bayanga, Besigan, Bonbon, Bulua, Canitoan, Carmen, Dansolihon,
Iponan, Kauswagan, Lumbia, Mambuaya, Pagalungan, Pagatpat, Patag, Pigsag-an, San Simon,

2-2
Taglimao, Tagpangi, Tignapoloan, Tuburan and Tumpagon. It has a population of 290,913 (as of
2010 Census of Population in the Philippines).

Out of the 24 barangays belonging to the first district, a total of ten barangays are urban
barangays and 14 are rural barangays.

On the other hand, the Second District with a total land area of 14,213.60 hectares comprises 56
barangays which are Agusan, Balubal, Bugo, Camaman-an, Consolacion, Cugman, F.S. Catanico,
Gusa, Indahag, Lapasan, Macabalan, Macasandig, Nazareth, Puerto, Puntod, Tablon and
Barangays 1-40. It has a population of 311,175 (as of 2010 Census of Population in the
Philippines). Out of the 56 barangays belonging to the Second District, a total of 53 are urban
barangays and three are rural barangays.

Table 2.1 Land Area by Barangay, 2010

Barangay Land Area (has.) Barangay Land Area (has.)
Cagayan de Oro City 57,851.00
District 1 43,637.40 Tablon 4,381.01
Baikingon 675.40 Barangay 1 10.60
Balulang 880.25 Barangay 2 3.67
Bayabas 177.17 Barangay 3 7.69
Bayanga 1,378.22 Barangay 4 2.75
Besigan 6,159.23 Barangay 5 2.57
Bonbon 116.28 Barangay 6 4.32
Bulua 661.21 Barangay 7 5.98
Canitoan 1,234.86 Barangay 8 2.92
Carmen 956.65 Barangay 9 3.11
Dansolihon 7,267.19 Barangay 10 4.79
Iponan 607.14 Barangay 11 3.27
Kauswagan 512.53 Barangay 12 2.29
Lumbia 3,320.31 Barangay 13 8.73
Mambuaya 1,104.29 Barangay 14 4.46
Pagalungan 1,075.79 Barangay 15 9.79
Pagatpat 1,100.07 Barangay 16 2.57
Patag 299.90 Barangay 17 7.71
Pigsag-an 1,063.87 Barangay 18 4.72
San Simon 1,339.50 Barangay 19 2.61
Taglimao 1,256.36 Barangay 20 2.10
Tagpangi 2,174.96 Barangay 21 4.72
Tignapoloan 7,795.12 Barangay 22 11.79
Tuburan 1,037.51 Barangay 23 8.25
Tumpagon 1,443.59 Barangay 24 11.83
District 2 14,213.60 Barangay 25 5.23
Agusan 512.69 Barangay 26 8.85
Balubal 721.32 Barangay 27 9.79
Bugo 807.31 Barangay 28 7.25
Camaman-an 731.92 Barangay 29 20.21
Consolacion 49.45 Barangay 30 6.26
Cugman 1,747.61 Barangay 31 19.67
F.S. Catanico 1,101.03 Barangay 32 8.92
Gusa 696.18 Barangay 33 8.35

2-3
 Barangay Land Area (has.) Barangay Land Area (has.)
Indahag 1,405.39 Barangay 34 4.06
Lapasan 227.26 Barangay 35 7.51
Macabalan 45.15 Barangay 36 6.70
Macasandig 397.58 Barangay 37 2.79
Nazareth 68.31 Barangay 38 3.74
Puerto 887.99 Barangay 39 2.32
Puntod 164.90 Barangay 40 13.61
Source: Socio-Economic Profile of Cagayan de Oro City, 2010

Climate. Cagayan de Oro City’s climate falls under Type III and IV of the Coronas Climate
Classification System of PAGASA. The western portion of Cagayan de Oro is classified under
Type III which is characterized by a short dry season, usually from February to April, and Type IV
climate in the eastern part of the City, characterized by an almost evenly distributed rainfall
during the whole year.

Temperature. Figure below show that from 1981 to 2010, the City has an annual mean
temperature of 26.8 °C while the average relative humidity is 81%. The hottest months are
April, May, and June while the coldest months are December, January, and February.

Figure 2.2 Monthly Average Temperature (1981-2010)

Source: PAGASA

Rainfall. When heavy rains occur, flood prone and low-lying barangays located along Cagayan
de Oro River, Iponan River, and along the coast are mostly affected. It is in these affected areas
where most of the informal settlers live. Downpour created floods overflows the small creeks
dissecting urban centers and settlement in Cagayan de Oro City such as: 1.) Bitan-ag Creek in
Limketkai Complex, Brgy. Lapasan, 2.) Bulua Creek dissecting Brgy. Kauswagan, and Binono-an
Creek in Brgy. Carmen.

As shown in Figure 2.3, the total annual average rainfall in Cagayan de Oro from 1981-2010 is
1,703.3 mm.

2-4
 Fig. 2.3

Source: PAGASA

Likewise, from June to November, which is the rainy season, the average rainfall per month is
184.43 mm. From December to May, which is the dry season, the average rainfall per month is
95.66 mm.

The city usually experiences rainfall that would last for about two hours followed by moderate
rains. Mines and Geosciences Bureau’s (MGB) rainfall record in the upstream section of Cagayan
River is 140 mm annually while average annual precipitation computed from monthly average
for a ten-year period (2001-2011) is 1,540.98 mm of which 72 % falls during June to November
and the remainder during the dry period December to May.

Topography. Cagayan de Oro City is characterized by a narrow coastal plain along the
Macajalar Bay and the highlands are separated by a steep incline escarpment. The lowlands are
relatively flat and its elevation is not more than 10 meters above the main sea level. The
highlands bound the City in the south from east to west. They consist of plateaus, terraces, and
gorges.

The map below shows the creeks and rivers traversing and draining to Macajalar Bay. There are
seven rivers namely: Cagayan River, Iponan River, Bigaan River, Cugman River, Umalag River,
Agusan River, and Alae River. The more prominent creeks are Binono-an, Bitan-ag, Indulong,
Kolambog, Sapong, and Umalag.

2-5
Figure 2.4 Various Rivers and Creeks of Cagayan de Oro

Slope. About 13,587 hectares or 28% of the City’s total land area has a slope of between 0 and
8% that is considered safe for most uses. Such areas are concentrated on the narrow coastal
plain, the flood plain areas of the Cagayan de Oro and Iponan Rivers, and the upland terraces.
The remaining 72% has slopes that are greater than 8% and pose a challenge to development.

Geology. Cagayan de Oro City is classified into three broad landforms: lowlands, level uplands,
and hills/mountains.

Soil types. The soils of Cagayan de Oro City are predominantly clayey. Other soil structures are
sand, sulfaquent, loam, and clayey loam. Soils that are good for agricultural production are San
Manuel Loam and Bantog Clay. The Matina Clay and Umingon Clay Loam are of lesser quality for
agricultural production. Other soil types which do not have any agricultural value are hydrosol,
beach sand and stony clay. They are suitable for urban or resort use.

Vulnerability to multiple hazards. Based on the City Social Welfare and Development (CSWD)
report during Tropical Storm (TS) Sendong, out of 80 barangays, there were 45 barangays
affected by the hydro-meteorological hazards.

A total of 20,088 families were affected by the said tropical storm. Of these, 6,977 were children,
19,021 women, 1,650 youth, 520 elderly, 268 adults and 99 children with disabilities.

At the onset of the event, 19,134 houses were damaged - 4,301 were totally washed out and
14,833 were partially damaged. There were 46 classrooms, 143 daycare centers, four social
welfare centers and six barangay health centers were also damaged.
After TS Sendong, a city-wide assessment was conducted by the Estate Management Division
(EMD) of the City Planning Development Office (CPDO). The report reveals that as of the
present, there are 24,813 households who are susceptible to flooding and Rain Induced
Landslide (RIL). This includes households living along the road, creeks and drainage.

Furthermore, based on the VAA report, 29 barangays are susceptible to Rain Induced Landslide
(RIL) (refer to Table 2.2 below).

2-6
Of these barangays, the Estate Management Division prioritized twelve (12) barangays that were
highly susceptible to RIL. These were barangays Balubal (Purok 1 & 7), Balulang (Balongis and
Manggahan), Camaman-an (Ramonal & Mahayag), Gusa (Quarry site), Indahag (Quarry site),
Lumbia, Macasandig, Lapasan (Hillside), Mambuaya (Zone 5), Pagalungan (Batinay and Sitio
Proper), Tignapolo-an (Kamang, Salimbal, Binagud, Lapog and Dungguan), and Nazareth.

The table below shows that flooding and typhoon scored the highest threat level to the city.
Hence, both flooding and typhoon has greater vulnerability impact to the communities
compared to the rest of the hazards mentioned below.

Table 2.2: Average Rating per Adaptive Capacity Dimension

Climate Change Threat Level Adaptive Capacity Relative Vulnerability Rating
Hazard (5-highest) (1-highest) (10-most vulnerable)
Flooding 4.8 2.23 7.03
Typhoon 4.25 1.8 6.05
Drought 2.4 2.55 4.95
RIL 2.2 2.2 4.4
Source: VAA Report

Figure 2.5 The Geohazard Map

In response to the hazards mentioned above, the following options/strategies are

recommended:

1. Relocate families living in high risk areas

2. Construction of affordable/decent and resilient houses
3. Upgrading of blighted areas
4. Land banking
5. Construction of flood control dikes
6. Construction of access road

2-7
 7. Construction of adequate drainage system
8. Adaption of climate resilient and green building technology
9. Construction of multi-story building
10. Delineation of “No Build Zone” Areas

Urban Development Trends

Cagayan de Oro City (CdeO) has assumed a role which is larger than its physical boundaries. It is
the second highest ranking urban settlement in the island of Mindanao, and is considered as the
most important center in CdeO-Iligan Corridor (CIC).
As the regional growth center, the city hosts the regional capital and is the seat of regional
administrative and higher level social services and urban amenities. The city’s proximity to the
region’s industrial estate also creates heavy linkages with the estate’s adjacent communities.
This cluster will serve as the hub of trading and services.
Likewise, this situation is indicative of the rapid urbanization of the city which serves as an
attraction to more people to come to the city to look for better opportunities.
With the present formulation of City Shelter Plan, the city can very well provide affordable and
decent housing for families in need of housing.

Population size and structure. Population reached 602,088 persons (2010 census), which is 74
percent of the total provincial population of 813,856. This represents an increase of 140,211
persons over the total population of 461,877 in 2000. This translates to an annual population
growth rate of 2.69 percent between 2000 and 2010 and it is expected that the population will
double in 26 years or in 2036.

Figure 2.6: Population Growth Patterns of Cagayan de Oro City, Region X, Philippines, 1970-
2010

Source: National Statistics Office (NSO)

Figure 2.7 shows that the number of males is almost the same as the females having a ratio of
99.5 males for every 100 females. About 28.5 percent of the total household population belongs
to the age group 1-14 years old. Productive population (ages 15-64 years old) comprise 66
percent, while 3.4 percent of the household population are elders (above 65 years old). The

2-8
proportion of household population belonging to age group 0-4 is 10.6 percent and this is made
up of 5.5 percent male and 5.1 percent female.

Figure 2.7 Age-Sex Pyramid of the Household Population, 2010

Age-Sex Pyramid of Household Population 2010
80 over
75-79
70-74
65-69 Male Female
60-64
55-59
50-54
45-49
40-44
35-39
30-34
25-29
20-24
15-19
10-14
5-9
0-4
40000 30000 20000 10000 0 10000 20000 30000 40000

Source: National Statistics Office, 2010 Census of Population and Housing

Youth dependency ratio (ages 0-14) is 30.6 percent while the elderly dependency ratio (65 years
old and over) is 3.4 percent from the total household. Overall, the dependency ratio of the city
reached 51.4 percent. This indicates that for every 100 persons ages 15-64 years old (working
age population), about 51 are economically dependent, (46 young dependent and 5 old
dependents). This ratio is also lower compared to the 2000 figure of 61 persons per working age
population. This decrease in dependency ratio indicates that more people are in the work force.

Table 2.3 Land Area, Population, Population Density and Number of Households by Barangay,
2010

Population
Land Area Number of
Barangays Population Density
(hectare) Households
(Person/ha)

Cagayan de Oro
City 56,966.63 602,088 10.57 137,465
Urban 19,752.25 555,605 28.13 127,213
Agusan 512.69 14,812 28.89 3,438
Balulang 880.25 32,531 36.96 7,868
Bayabas 177.17 12,999 73.37 2,959
Bonbon 116.28 9,195 79.08 2,093
Bugo 807.31 27,122 33.60 6,303
Bulua 661.21 31,345 47.41 7,036
Camaman-an 731.92 24,651 33.68 5,492
Canitoan 1,234.86 15,069 12.20 3,343
Carmen 956.65 67,583 70.65 15,360

2-9
 Population
Land Area Number of
Barangays Population Density
(hectare) Households
(Person/ha)

Consolacion 49.45 9,919 200.57 2435

Cugman 1,747.61 20,531 11.75 4,538
Gusa 696.18 26,117 37.51 5,773
Iponan 607.14 20,707 34.11 4,838
Kauswagan 512.53 34,541 67.39 7,598
Lapasan 227.26 41,903 184.38 9,624
Lumbia 3,320.00 14,079 4.24 3,044
Macabalan 45.15 20,303 449.70 4,470
Macasandig 397.58 23,310 58.63 5,203
Nazareth 68.31 10,658 156.03 2,526
Patag 299.99 17,219 57.40 1,188
Puerto 887.99 11,475 12.92 2,518
Puntod 164.90 18,399 111.58 4,366
Tablon 4,381.01 18,608 4.25 4,685
Barangay 1 10.60 453 42.73 115
Barangay 2 3.67 84 22.88 21
Barangay 3 7.69 177 23.02 42
Barangay 4 2.75 108 39.25 29
Barangay 5 2.57 83 32.26 18
Barangay 6 4.32 212 49.02 38
Barangay 7 5.98 542 90.61 131
Barangay 8 2.92 157 53.71 40
Barangay 9 3.11 132 42.44 38
Barangay 10 4.79 616 128.48 139
Barangay 11 3.27 342 104.53 93
Barangay 12 2.29 469 205.23 101
Barangay 13 8.73 2,330 266.79 542
Barangay 14 4.46 479 107.45 99
Barangay 15 9.79 2,966 302.83 760
Barangay 16 2.58 143 55.47 35
Barangay 17 7.71 2,342 303.88 554
Barangay 18 4.72 1,496 316.94 350
Barangay 19 2.61 419 160.59 97
Barangay 20 2.10 121 57.65 32
Barangay 21 4.72 254 53.82 82
Barangay 22 11.79 1,944 164.86 444
Barangay 23 8.25 916 111.09 215
Barangay 24 11.83 929 78.56 243
Barangay 25 5.23 1,295 247.84 324
Barangay 26 8.85 2,383 269.36 574
Barangay 27 9.79 1,380 141.03 292
Barangay 28 7.25 541 74.58 125

2-10
 Population
Land Area Number of
Barangays Population Density
(hectare) Households
(Person/ha)

Barangay 29 20.21 485 23.99 131

Barangay 30 6.26 875 139.79 203
Barangay 31 19.67 1,506 76.55 338
Barangay 32 8.92 1,410 158.09 380
Barangay 33 8.35 86 10.31 29
Barangay 34 4.06 621 152.81 148
Barangay 35 7.51 2,395 319.04 523
Barangay 36 6.70 791 118.12 215
Barangay 37 2.79 77 27.61 31
Barangay 38 3.74 94 25.14 32
Barangay 39 2.32 46 19.81 8
Barangay 40 13.61 830 61.00 178
Rural 37,214.37 46,483 1.25 10,252
Baikingon 675.40 2,342 3.47 621
Balubal 721.32 2,893 4.01 648
Bayanga 1,378.22 2,769 2.01 623
Besigan 5,717.04 1,404 0.25 257
Dansolihon 7267.19 4,811 0.66 991
FS Catanico 1,100.97 1,710 1.55 404
Indahag 1,405.39 6,235 4.44 1,448
Mambuaya 1,104.29 2,490 2.25 533
Pagalungan 1075.79 1,806 1.68 418
Pagatpat 1,100.07 5,178 4.71 1,188
Pigsag-an 1,063.87 1,256 1.18 214
San Simon 1,339.50 1,346 1.00 318
Taglimao 1,256.36 1,418 1.13 308
Tagpangi 2,174.96 2,684 1.23 618
Tignapoloan 7,352.88 4,514 0.61 899
Tuburan 1,037.51 1,395 1.34 288
Tumpagon 1,443.59 2,232 1.55 476
Source: National Statistics Office /National Statistics Coordination Board

Migration trend. Cagayan de Oro City’s growth rate is 2.69% based on the 2010 NSO actual
census, while regional growth rate comprises 2.06%. This shows that the city has a higher
growth rate of about 0.63% from that of the region. This increase represents that there are
more people coming in the city. The availability and accessibility of the city to public services,
key facilities and critical infrastructures encourage people from neighboring provinces, cities and
municipalities to migrate to the city.

This shows that there is an increasing demand for shelter due to population growth. The
formulation of the City Shelter Plan (CSP) is one strategy to this situation. In the CSP, demand for
housing due to population growth is being considered.

2-11
Income and poverty incidence. Based on 2009 Small Area Poverty Estimates of the National
Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB), Cagayan de Oro City posted the least in poverty incidence
in Northern Mindanao. Poverty incidence is measured by “the proportion of families/population
with per capita income less than the per capita poverty threshold to the total number of
families/population”. According to the said estimates, Cagayan de Oro City had a poverty
incidence of 22.80% which implies that for every 100 families in the City has an income below
the poverty line.

Labor force. The average labor force participation rate for both sexes comprises 69.8 percent
(81.7 male and 57.7 female) as of 2010 for ages 15 years old and up; lower than that of 2007
that is 70.9 percent (based on NSO Regional Survey). The decreasing number of labor force
indicates that there are more members of the household who are not in the labor force.

Table 2.4: Labor Force Population, 2010 Cagayan de Oro City

Age Both Sexes % Male % Female %
Groups

Total 387,180 100.00 192,882 49.82 194,299 50.18

15 – 19 70,220 18.14 34,982 9.03 35,239 9.10
20 – 24 62,407 16.12 31,089 8.03 31,318 8.09
25 – 29 54,197 14.00 26,999 6.97 27,198 7.02
30 – 34 44,243 11.43 22,041 5.69 22,203 5.73
35 – 39 39,690 10.25 19,772 5.11 19,918 5.14
40 – 44 33,795 8.73 16,836 4.35 16,959 4.38
45 – 49 29,968 7.74 14,929 3.86 15,039 3.88
50 – 54 24,863 6.42 12,386 3.20 12,477 3.22
55 – 59 17,517 4.52 8,726 2.25 8,791 2.27
60 – 64 10,280 2.65 5,121 1.32 5,159 1.33

Source: National Statistics Office

Employment. The average employment rate increased to 95 percent in 2010 from 94.0 percent
in 2007 (based on NSO Regional Survey). This slight increase of employment rate indicates that
there are more members of the household falling under ‘not in the labor force’ category.
Underemployment rate in 2010 was about 28.0 percent, lower than that of 2007 which is 30.7
percent. This further indicates that the City has available human resource for new industries.

Existing and Proposed Land Use

Existing land use. The general land use of the city emphasizes on the following districts/areas:
agricultural, built-up, forest, mining and quarrying, open land, swamp/marshland, and other
areas (roads, rivers and creeks).

The significant difference in the city’s total land area from 46,246.13 hectares in 2000 to 57,851
hectares in 2012 resulted from a comprehensive and rigorous review of its territorial
boundaries. Most of these areas form part of the city’s forest.

Table 2.5 shows the existing General Land Use of Cagayan de Oro as compared with CY 2000
General Land Use of the City.

2-12
Table 2.5: Comparative General Land Use of Cagayan de Oro City (2000-2012)
2000 2012
General Land Use
Area (has.) Percent to Total Area (has.) Percent to Total
Agricultural 13,704.92 29.63 16,393.39 28.34
Built Up Area 7,714.50 16.68 11,977.10 20.70
Mining and Quarrying 23.35 0.05 31.12 0.05
Open Land 7,037.09 15.22 3,079.18 5.32
Preservation Area
Forest 17,726.57 38.33 24,652.75 45.41
Swamp/Marshland 39.70 0.09 102.53 0.18
Roads, Rivers and Creeks - - 1,614.93
Total 46,246.13 100.00 57,851.00 100.00
Source: City Assessment Department/GIS-CPDO (CDO SEP, 2011)

Figure 2.8: General Existing Landuse Map

Proposed land use. The proposed general land use as shown in table 2.6, the forest use has a
bigger area of 27,730.32 ha. or 47.93% from the total land area of the city.

Agricultural areas. The Agricultural area covers approximately 14,759.63 ha. or 25.51% from the
total proposed land use of the city. Most of these areas are located in highland/rural barangays
and also some urbanized barangays like: Canitoan, Iponan, Bulua, Bayabas, Lumbia, and
Pagatpat.

2-13
 Table 2.6: Proposed General Land Use
DESCRIPTION AREA (has) %
AGRICULTURAL 14,759.63 25.51%
FOREST 27,730.32 47.93%
TOURISM 1,167.34 2.02%
URBAN LAND USE 12,123.47 20.96%
TOTAL 55,781
AREA COVERED BY UTILITIES/ROADS/ETC 2,070.24 3.58%
TOTAL LAND AREA 57,851.00 100%

Figure 2.9: Proposed General Land Use Map

Urban land use. The urban land use covers approximately 12,123.47 has. or 20.96% from the
total proposed general land use. The residential area occupies the largest portion of the urban
land use .It covers approximately 9,183.19 has. or 75.75% of the total urban land use.

Existing and Proposed Infrastructure

Roads and bridges. Cagayan de Oro City has a total road length of 630.8081 kilometers
categorized into: Earth (17.8254km), Gravel (313.021km), Asphalt (34.5617km), and Concrete
(265.40km).

There are 17 existing bridges along the National and City roads of the city which include three
steel bridges and fourteen concrete bridges. There are other 21 bridges along barangay roads
with six bridges made of steel while the rest are either spillway or bailey. The bridges along the
primary and secondary roads are generally in good condition while those located in hinterland
barangays need maintenance and rehabilitation.

2-14
Transportation. The City is a major public transport center. Several bus companies provide
Land transportation services with routes plying to and from Bukidnon, Davao, Butuan, Iligan,
Zamboanga, and Manila. Other services are facilitated by cargo trucks, vans, and several types
of light vehicles for hire that serve the entire island of Mindanao.

Power. Power supply and distribution is critical for its major role as commercial and banking
center. The city is built by the river that flows in the middle of the city business center.
Currently, there are two power distribution utilities that serve the city namely, Cagayan de Oro
Electric Power and Light Company (CEPALCO) and Misamis Oriental Rural Electric Service
Cooperative (MORESCO 1). CEPALCO serves 103,074 households or 75% of the total 137,465
households population of its service coverage area while MORESCO I serves the sixteen
barangays in the west of urban center with 8,129 households.

Water. Water supply in the city is mainly extracted from groundwater reservoirs and is being
managed and distributed by Cagayan de Oro Water District (COWD). The COWD sources of
water included the following: 1) one Malasag Spring, 2) 27 production wells, and 3) reservoirs.

Communications. Sophisticated services give the City its modern character. Internet has
experienced significant growth as service providers increase.

The existing communication facilities in CdeO are postal service, seven telephone service
providers, three cellular mobile telephone service providers, four telephone long distance
exchange (international exchange carrier), nine Broadband Networks, one Trunked Radio
Station, seven Internet Service Providers (registered), seven TV Stations, three Cable TV
Providers, five AM Broadcast Stations, and fifteen FM Broadcast Stations.

Waste management. Cagayan de Oro City’s 17-hectare landfill located in Upper Dagong,
Carmen is 3.7 kilometers away from downtown with an average travel time of 16 minutes from
the Poblacion. It has a capacity of approximately 1.9 million cubic meters and is expected to be
adequate for 12 to 20 years of use starting 1997. The location map of the existing landfill and the
proposed sanitary landfill is shown in Figure 2.10.

Figure 2.10 The Location Map of the Sanitary Landfill

2-15
Volume of waste collected and dumped at the existing landfill averaged at approximately 700
cubic meters per day based on the data of garbage collected and disposed at the landfill in 2011.

Air transportation. Laguindingan Airport is approximately 40 kilometers from the city.

Table 2.7 Schedule of Flights of Laguindingan Airport, 2013

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
PAL (Mla-CdeO-Mla)
5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CEBU PACIFIC (Mla-CdeO-Mla)
5 5 5 5 5 5 5
CEBU PACIFIC (Cebu-CdeO-
Cebu)
3 3 3 3 3 3 3
PAL EXPRESS
(Cebu-CdeO-Cebu)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
ZEST AIRWAYS
(Cebu-CdeO-Cebu)
1 1 1 1 1 1 1

Source: CAAP (Temporary Schedule)

Seaports. Port of Cagayan de Oro in Macabalan area is located near the estuary of Cagayan
River. It has an anchorage depth of 18 meters and is around 400 meters from the shoreline. It
has two authorized cargo-handling companies.

The City has one government base port and six private ports, namely: 1. Baseport (government),
Macabalan; 2. Cagayan de Oro Oil Mill, Tablon; 3. Cagayan Corn Products Corp., Tablon; 4. Del
Monte Phils. Inc., Bugo; 5. General Milling Corporation, Tablon; 6. MITIMCO – Mindanao Timber
Company, Baloy and 7. Carlos A Gothong Inc., Baloy. With its strategic location and with the
numerous seaports along its extensive coast, the City has sustained its role as the principal
distribution center for the adjacent provinces of Misamis Oriental.

These are the following proposed infrastructure programs and projects of the city:

1. Construction of flood control dikes.

2. Construction of wastewater treatment facility.
3. Construction of new access road.
4. Retrofitting of roads and bridges and other infra facilities.
5. Rehabilitation and maintenance of roads.
a. Widening of road to ease access.
b. Concreting of roads.
c. Asphalt overlaying of roads.
6. Establishment of bicycle lane and rack.
7. Shifting to less power consuming technology (conversion of sodium/CFL lights to LED).
8. Construction of adequate drainage system.
9. Adaption of climate resilient and green building technology.
10. Installation of additional transmission lines.

2-16
 11. Promotion of rain harvesting facility for commercial establishment and residential
buildings.
12. Construction of multi-story building.
13. Delineation of “No Build Zone” Areas.
14. Intensification of the cities land banking program.
15. Relocation of informal settlers from canals and creeks.

Organizations, Institutions and Governance. Confronted with the daunting problems of a city
housing and relocation program, the present administration embarked on a Resettlement
Agenda that initially covers the following:

· Sendong victims relocation sites;

· Informal and vulnerable settlers; and
· “Piso-piso” beneficiaries
· Underprivileged families affected by the implementation of government
infrastructure projects.

The Cagayan de Oro City Resettlement Program is one of the priority projects of the new
administration as stated in the eight point agenda. Thus the following are identified to play a
major role in housing.

Shelter and Housing Development Multi-Sectoral Task Force. The Task Force was created by
virtue of Executive Order No. 020-13 “An Order Creating the Shelter and Housing Development
Multi-Sectoral Task Force.” The team is tasked to address the challenges confronting the City’s
housing and resettlement programs. It is also tasked to evaluate the inherited program and
projects, formulate a comprehensive housing and urban development master plan, and engage
the widest possible participation of local and national governments, foreign governments and
international organizations, private and civil society stakeholders.

Cagayan de Oro Housing Board. The CdeOHB was reorganized by Executive Order No. 039-13.
The Board’s composition is mostly coming from the private sector to ensure the widest possible
participation of the different sectors of the community and civil society organizations. The
Board shall, among others, formulate, develop, implement and monitor policies on the provision
for housing and resettlement areas, and on the observance of the right of the underprivileged
and homeless to just and humane eviction and demolition.

Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC). HUDCC has been giving
assistance to the Local Government Unit (LGU) particularly in the preparation of this plan, and
also in updating the LGU regarding housing related policies, guidelines and programs.
Organizations such as National Housing Authority (NHA), Housing and Land Use Regulatory
Board (HLURB), Socialized Housing Finance Corporation (SHFC) and Home Development Mutual
Fund (HDMF) are also extending financial and technical assistance to the CdeO. Specifically,
CdeO has been a recipient of the Resettlement Assistance Program of NHA, Localized
Community Mortgage Program of SHFC and HLURB in the implementation of the 20% Balanced
Housing. The Presidential Commission for the Urban Poor (PCUP) has been playing a role in the
housing strategies of the LGU for the Informal Settlers Families (ISF). It undertakes the following
activities on social preparation:

2-17
 · Social Preparation:
a. Consultation
b. Information, Education and Communication
c. Multi-Sectoral Dialogue
d. Advocacy or people’s participation
e. Coordination
· Human Development and Basic Services
· Employment and Livelihood
· Monitoring of Demolition and Eviction
· Policy Formulation/Recommendation and Advocacy
· Accreditation of Urban Poor Organizations (UPOs)
· Capacity Building and
· Various Consultations

Various Stakeholders. The partners supporting the various housing concerns in the city are
Gawad Kalinga, Habitat for Humanity, Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD),
Shell Philippines, Filipino-Chinese Lucio Tan, Lutheran World Relief (LWR), Filipino Chinese
Community (FCC), SM Corporations, Rotary Club of CdeO, Berjaya Group of Companies, Oro
Habitat, Habitat for Humanity (ALL HANDS), Habitat for Humanity (Philippines), Amakan
Permanent Houses, CARITAS, Tabang Cagayan, Xavier University – Ateneo de Cagayan, St.
Francis Xavier Church, NHA Oro Coop, and various religious orders and group. Likewise, the
Social Action Center (SAC) of the Archdiocese of Cagayan de Oro City, TOUCH Foundation Inc.,
Group Foundation Inc. and Kagay-anon Emergency Disaster Response Network (KEDRN) are also
extending assistance to the survivors of the different calamities.

Local Economic Outlook

Income class of the city. Cagayan de Oro is classified as the first class and highly urbanized city.
The local economy is largely based on industry, commerce, trade, service and tourism. The
investment in Cagayan de Oro City for the six months of 2012 has reached 7.4 billion pesos
outpacing the local government expectation of nearly 1000%. Investments in the city are
dominated by malls; high rise hotels and condominiums and conventions centers. The net
income for 2012 pegged at 2,041,036,807.89 pesos. (Source: Wikipedia, free encyclopedia)

The city plays a very important economic role not only in Region X but also in the whole
Mindanao Island. The development framework aligns itself to the Regional twin spatial
strategies namely: (a) polycentric development strategy and (b) corridor development strategy.

Annual Income (local revenue & IRA). The City of Cagayan de Oro gets its income and other
revenue from the following: taxes, fees, permits & licenses, business and services, subsidies
from the national government and other sources allowed by law. Total revenue generated in
2011 amounted to PhP 1,719,874,752.98. The biggest source of income is the Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA) of PhP 902,306,610.00 which is about 52.46%. Income generation by source in
the last three years is shown in Table 2.8.

2-18
Table 2.8 Income Generation by Source for the last Three Years (2009-2011), Cagayan de Oro
City
Income (Php)
Income Source
2009 2010 2011
Internal Revenue
776,465,278.00 840,735,811.00 902,306,610.00
Allotment (IRA)
Tax Revenue 528,910,558.20 622,571,709.70 635,392,667.87
Fees, Permits &
27,483,524.77 22,248,602.67 24,347,761.66
Licenses Income
Business & Service
40,228,723.33 101,388,672.19 108,867,553.87
Income
Other Income 27,826,932.86 60,081,607.07 48,960,159.58
TOTAL INCOME 1,400,915,017.16 1,647,026,403.63 1,719,874,752.98
Source: Office of the City Accountant, Cagayan de Oro

Major Economic Activities. As the regional growth center, the city hosts the regional capital and
is the seat of regional administrative and higher level social services and urban amenities. The
proximity to the region’s industrial estate (CIC) also creates heavy linkages with the estate’s
adjacent communities. This will serve as a hub of trading and services. It is a strategic location
for major infrastructure and capital investment to lead the economic growth of the region.

The economic activities in this area will gradually transform into service and knowledge-based
economy in the city. Likewise, the city is one of the “Tourism Development Areas” (TDAs) and
also positioning as a competitive candidate for new wave and smarter cities in promoting
information and communications technology (ICT) to achieve a more equitable and sustained
economic growth.

2-19
 Chapter 3

ASSESSMENT OF SHELTER NEED

Definition of terms. In order to have a common understanding of the terms used in this plan,
the following are the technical notes or terms used for the Shelter Needs Assessment.

GROWTH RATE – the rate at which the population is increasing (or decreasing) in a given period
due to natural increase and net migration. It is expressed as a percentage of the base
population.

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE – the average number of persons who live in the household,
computed as the household population in a given area divided by the corresponding total
number of households in that area.

HOUSEHOLD – a social unit consisting of a person or a group of persons who sleep in the same
housing unit and have common arrangements in the preparation and consumption of food.

BACKLOG – the number of dwelling units needed at the beginning of the planning period due to
doubled-up households (HHs), displaced units and homeless HHs / individuals.

DISPLACED UNIT– units located in:

· Danger areas (esteros, railroad tracks, garbage dumps, river banks and flood
prone areas
· Areas where government infrastructure projects are to be implemented
· Areas affected by court orders for demolition/eviction/ pending case for eviction

DOUBLED-UP HOUSEHOLDS (double occupancy) – exists when two or more households share
one dwelling unit.

HOMELESS – individuals or households living in parks, along sidewalks and all those without any
form of shelter.

PLANNING PERIOD – covers the duration that will be needed to realize the housing vision of the
LGU.

BASE YEAR – is the year before the first planning period or the last census year.

PROGRAM PERIOD – is the time frame set by the LGU to meet the target housing needs due to
backlog, population growth and upgrading needs.

HOUSING STOCK – is the number of households during the beginning of the first planning period
minus the number of homeless households and/or individuals and divided the difference by the
number of households per dwelling unit. It also refers to the number of occupied dwelling units
at the beginning of the 1st planning period.

3-1
UPGRADING NEED – the need for improving land tenure status, e.g. provision of minimum
security of tenure as in a written contract to possessing a title to the land; access to basic
services, e.g., macadam road to concrete road; and house condition, e.g., from semi-permanent
to permanent structure.

Basic Data Assumptions

Assumptions and Definitions. The City Shelter Plan covers a nine – year period, commencing on
2014 up to 2022. In assessing the housing situation, baseline data used were taken from the
2010 census on Population of the NSO. The rest of the figures were projected based on the
trends on population from 2000 and 2010 Census.

Oftentimes, data are not readily available and inaccurate to give a vivid picture of the housing
situation of the City. The following are the basic assumptions and data used by the planner in all
the computations and projections made related to the plan formulation.

1. Planning Period is from 2014-2022 (9 years).

2. The population growth rate is 2.69% based in NSO 2000 & 2010 population data and will
remain constant throughout the planning period.

3. Housing Stock is computed to be 142,966 (2013) which is derived from the number of
households (147,372) divided by the ratio of households per dwelling unit (1.0308).
Ratio of HH/DU is based on 2010 NSO data.

4. Household size of 4.4 is based on NSO 2010 data, will remain the same throughout the
9-year planning period.

5. There are no homeless households in the City. Homeless households (HHs) are those not
having roofs above their heads.

6. Number of households needing priority relocation (displaced units) totals to 34,898.

These are families/HHs in danger or hazardous areas, households affected by
government infrastructure projects, households with courts orders and households with
pending threats of demolition. Please see Worksheet 1 of Annex for listing of affected
areas.

6.1 Number of households on danger or hazardous areas, landslide prone areas (only
high risk areas considered), flood prone areas including no build zone: 24,813
6.1.1 Number of HHs in rain-induced landslide prone areas: 3,704
6.1.2 Number of HHs in flood prone areas: 15,815
6.1.3 Number of HHs in riverside areas: 2,926
6.1.4 Number of HHs in creek side areas: 540
6.1.5 Number of HHs in coastal/seaside areas: 811
6.1.6 Number of HHs in hillside areas: 652
6.1.7 Number of HHs along the road: 295
6.1.8 Number of HHs along drainage areas: 70
6.2 Number of households affected by Government Infrastructure Projects: 1,176
6.3 Number of households with Court Order: 5,457
6.4 Number of households with pending threats of demolition or eviction: 3,452

3-2
7. The planners have not included active fault zones because Cagayan de Oro seldom
experience earthquakes that are of tectonic origin. The map of the distribution of active
faults and trenches in the Philippines reveals that Cagayan de Oro has no trace or
likelihood of being directly affected. (Source: Disaster Risk Assessment (DRA) report for
the City of Cagayan de Oro (Social Sector).

8. Adequate land tenure refers to lands that are being owned, amortized and covered by
lease or usufruct agreements including those issued with certificates of award.

9. Number of HHs needing tenurial upgrading totals to 248. They are composed of both on-
site and off-site qualified recipients of LGU housing assistance through direct purchase,
CMP/LCMP, other programs like residential free patent under RA 10023 and other
housing strategies and programs of the government, non-government organizations and
private entities.

10. The 7,955 households that are potential for displacement due to climate change impacts
will not be relocated. Access roads will just be constructed connecting their
communities to vital institutions and services, particularly to life lines in times of flood
and other calamities.

11. Adequate power supply is defined as a readily available power supply and adequate
distribution line provided by legitimate power providers (CEPALCO and MORESCO),
which can be accessed by legal individual housing units.

12. Adequate potable water supply is defined as a readily available water supply and
adequate distribution line provided by legitimate water provider (COWD), which can be
accessed by legal individual housing units.

13. Adequate sanitary facility refers to water-sealed toilets with depository that is
exclusively used by a household.

14. Adequate garbage collection is daily collection of domestic waste in urban areas and a
minimum of three times a week collection for rural Barangays.

15. Adequate drainage system is defined as sufficient and efficient drainage system in
accordance with the design set or prescribed by the Local Government Unit (LGU) or
other standards set by other approved agency.

16. Adequate road and road access in accordance with minimum standards set or prescribed
by BP220.

17. Units needing structural upgrading refer to unacceptable housing units (for those that
are made of light materials e.g. cogon, nipa, anahaw), which will not last for five years
from 2013 including dilapidated or makeshift houses and declared not fit by the Building
Official per provision of the National Building Code.

18. The following assumptions are drawn in assigning the six income groupings of the target
household beneficiaries:

3-3
 1ST Income Group – trisikad/motorela drivers, fishermen, househelps, street/market
vendors, waiters/waitresses, salespersons, laborers, odd Jobs earning below the poverty
threshold

2ND Income Group – jeepney/taxi/bus/van drivers, heavy equipment operators, skilled

laborers, home-based computer-related Jobs, small-scale entrepreneurs, security
guards.

3RD Income Group – contractual government /private employees, realty brokers,

entrepreneurs, insurance agents,

4TH Income Group – regular first level government /private employees, OFW-domestic
and laborers, medium-scale entrepreneurs.

5TH Income Group – regular second level government /private employees; OFWs holding
technical and supervisory positions.

6TH Income Group – government /private employees holding managerial positions &
above; large-scale entrepreneurs, professional practitioners like doctors, lawyers,
architects, engineers, CPAs, etc.

19. The potential percentage of income for upgrading or new housing is estimated as
follows:

1ST Income Group – 10% (savings from house rental 9.1%; house maintenance and minor
repairs 0.2%; personal care & effects 0.5%; other expenditures 0.2%)

2ND Income Group –10% (savings from house rental 7.9%; house maintenance and minor
repairs 0.4%; personal care & effects 0.5%; food not elsewhere classified 1%; other
expenditures 0.2%)

3RD Income Group – 10% (savings from house rental 8.2%; house maintenance and minor
repairs 0.5%; meat & meat preparation 0.6%; food not elsewhere classified 0.7%)

4th Income Group – 12% (savings from house rental 9.8; maintenance 0.8; coffee, cocoa,
tea 0.4%; meat and meat preparation 1%)

5tH Income Group – 12% (savings from house rental 10.4; maintenance 1%; durable
furniture 0.6%)

6th – Income GROUP – 15% (savings from house rental 11%; maintenance 1.2%;
household operation 1%; meat and meat prep 0.8%; other expenditures 1%)

Current Housing Situation. The year 2013 (the base year in the Planning Period for the City
Shelter Plan) had shown dramatic growth in terms of catering the needs of informal settlers, the
urban poor and the housing concern of the higher income bracket as well as the government
employees of the City. This growth was made possible because of the close coordination and
participation of government and private housing agencies, developers, investors and lending
institutions. The production of houses ranges from core houses to ready to occupy units and
from row houses to duplex in the resettlement areas.

3-4
However, the gathered data magnifies the urgent need for all sectors to join hands and exert a
unified effort to effect meaningful changes to secure levels of sustainable housing development
program for future generation, a program, which also attunes itself to the city’s economic
development and growth just as it works tirelessly towards the legislation of a child friendly and
resilient sensitive housing policies.

The urban land use of Cagayan de Oro City is dominantly built up areas which
includes residential, commercial, industrial and institutional areas as well as parks and open
spaces. They are predominantly found along the east-west stretch of the city between Macajalar
Bay and the escarpment areas. Patches can also be found along the Lumbia Road north of the
airport and along the Macasandig-Taguanao road.

The built up areas of the city constitutes approximately 11,977.10 hectares or 20.70% of the
total land area of 57,851 hectares.

The residential areas in the proposed urban land use remain the highest allocation estimated at
9,183.19 has. or 75.75% of the total urban land use of 12,123.47 has. as shown in Table 3.1.

Table 3.1 Proposed Urban Land Use of the City

Land Use Categories Area (Hectares) % to Total
Agro-Industrial 1,189.11 9.81
Commercial 688.96 5.68
Industrial 284.81 3.07
Institutional 372.53 2.35
Open Space/Vacant Land 325.00 2.68
Residential 9,183.19 75.75
Swamp/Marshland 79.87 0.66
Total 12,123.47 100.00

The existing subdivision covers a total of 153.49 hectares and out of which only 18.32 hectares
was generated for socialized housing (see Table 3.2 ) and out of the lots generated for socialized
housing about 62% is contributed by the LGU and the HOA per approved Complex Subdivisions
Applications covering the period 2009-2013.

Table 3.2 Land Area and Lots Generated by Housing Category per approved Complex
Subdivision Applications from 2009-2013
Land Area
Housing Category % to Total No. of Lots %
(sq.m.)
A. Open Market 1,027.059 66.91 3,010 37.36
B. Economic Housing 324.626 21.15 2,206 27.38
C. SHP 183.224 11.94 2,841 35.26
TOTAL 1,534.909 100.00 8,057 100.00

A total of 133,366 occupied housing units were recorded in Cagayan de Oro city in 2010. This
translates to a ratio of 103 households for every 100 occupied housing units, with 4.5 persons
per occupied housing units. In 2000, there were 103 households per 100 occupied housing units,
and 5.1 persons per occupied housing unit.

3-5
In 2010, the proportion of occupied housing units with outer walls made of concrete/brick/stone
increased from 33.0 percent in 2000 to 45.8 percent in 2010.

The proportion of occupied housing units with outer walls made of wood decreased from 37.6
percent in 2000 to 30.0 percent in 2010. Those with outer walls made of half
concrete/brick/stone and half wood decreased from 22.4 percent in 2000 to 17.7 percent in
2010.Meanwhile, nine in every 10 (90.0 percent) of the occupied housing units in 2010 had roofs
made of galvanized iron/aluminum, higher than the proportion of 82.8 percent recorded in
2000.

Table 3.3 Occupied Housing Units by Construction Materials of the Roof and Outer Walls:
Cagayan de Oro City, 2010
Construction Total Construction Materials of the Roof
Materials of Occupied Galvanized Tile / Half GI / Wood Cogon / Makeshift Asbestos
Outer Walls Housing Iron (GI) / Concrete Half Nipa/ / Salvaged / Others
Units Aluminum / Clay Concrete Anahaw /
Tile Improvised
Materials
Total 133,366 120,001 877 3,302 3,630 4,561 837 158
Concrete / 61,052 59,595 657 371 249 70 16 94
Brickstone
Wood 40,022 34,079 102 840 2,902 1,854 216 29
Half 23,546 21,003 110 1,967 343 108 11 4
concrete/
brick/
stone &
half wood
Galvanized 336 282 8 28 9 7 - 2
Iron /
Aluminum
Bamboo/ 6,636 3,892 - 72 96 2,311 163 12
sawali/
cogon/
nipa
Asbestos 97 90 - - - - - 7
Glass 21 15 - 3 - - - 3
Makeshift/ 1,181 628 - 13 21 125 393 1
salvaged/
improvise
materials
Others 451 310 - 8 10 86 33 4
No walls 24 17 - - - - 5 2

Table 3.4 shows that in 2010, more than half of the households lived in lots that they owned or
amortized or of the total 137,465 households, 55.16 percent owned or amortized the lots that
they occupied. The corresponding figure in 2000 was lower at 46.9 percent. Moreover, 18.99
percent of the households occupied lots which were rent–free but with consent of the owner,
15.19 percent rented the lots that they occupied while 6.32 percent occupied lots which were
rent-free but without consent of the owner.

3-6
 Table 3.4 Households by Tenure Status of the Lot, 2010
Tenure Status of the Lot Number of %
Households
Total 137,465 100.00
Owned/being amortized/owner-like 75,838 55.16
Rented 20,875 15.19
Rent-free with consent of owner 26,098 18.99
Rent-free without consent of owner 8,681 6.32
Not reported/Not applicable 5,973 4.34

Power distribution utilities are answered by two legitimate power providers namely Cagayan de
Oro Electric Power and Light Company (CEPALCO) and Misamis Oriental Electric Service
Cooperative (MORESCO). These power providers have efficiently supplied the needs of both the
urban and rural barangays in the City.

For the past five years, CEPALCO’s number of customers grew at an average of 3% per year or
around 4,000 customers per year. However, CEPALCO is capable to serve any additional
customers even beyond the 3% growth.

The Cagayan de Oro Water District (COWD) provides potable water in almost all parts of the
Rural and Urban Barangays. It has sufficiently provided the demands of the City. The annual
capacity of COWD by 2014 is projected at 546,692, which is more than enough to provide the
needs of new units.

Toilet facilities of different households vary. Out of 137,465 total household populations, a total
of 101,281 or 73.68% household used exclusively the water – sealed sewer septic tank while a
total of 19,014 or 13.83% household shared with other household the use of water-sealed sewer
septic tank. With regards to the used exclusively by household water-sealed other depository, a
total of 3,577 households or 2.60% and water- sealed other depository shared with other
household totaled to 3,392 or 2.47%. Also a total of 4,205 households or 3.6% uses the closed pit
type of toilet facilities and a total of1, 897 household or 1.38% uses the open pit type of toilet
facility. There are also a considerable number of households that uses the pail system and
others which totaled to 1,274 or about 0.93% and those with no toilet facility totaled to 2,820 or
2.6% but share a common depository with neighbors.

Table 3.5 Number of Households by Type of Toilet Facilities

(Figures are based on a 20% sample household)
Region, Total Type of Toilet Facility
Province, & Households Water Water Water Water Closed Open Others None
Highly sealed, sealed, sealed, sealed, Pit Pit (Pail
Urbanized City sewer sewer septic, other other system
septic, tank tank shared depository depository and
used with other used shared others)
exclusively HH exclusively with other
by HH by HH HH
Philippines 20,171,899 12,331,769 1,731,638 1,730,616 718,232 1,401,430

Region X 917,840 520,890 80,293 70,939 31,220 97,399

(NorMin)
Mis. Or. 173,231 104,950 15,254 14,943 5,742 13,689 6,572 1,592 10,483
(excluding
CdeO)
Cagayan de 137,465 101,281 19,014 3,577 3,392 4,205 1,897 1,274 2,820
Oro City

3-7
The most dominant problem that needs to be addressed is the poor drainage system around the
City, which results to flooding. Presence of debris or barrier, which interferes with flows of
canals and rivers, should be addressed. Massive widening of current drainage canals and
declogging is needed. One of the socialized housing projects of the City, located in Balubal needs
drainage system upgrading.

Figure 3.1 Absence of Drainage System in Balubal Socialized Housing Project

As reflected in Table 3.6, out of the total 137,465 households in Cagayan de Oro City, 101,290 or
73.68% are served by garbage trucks and only 6,735 or 4.9% households are dumping in
individual pit (not burned). Moreover, a total of 24,200 households or 17.60% usually burn their
garbage and about 1,585 or 1.15% prefer the manner of composting as their way of garbage
disposal.

Table 3.6 Number of HHs by Usual Manner of Garbage Disposal, 2010

(Figures are based on a 20% sample households)
Region, Province, Total Usual Manner of Garbage Disposal
& Highly Households Picked up Dumping in Burning Composting
Urbanized City by garbage individualized
truck pit
Philippines 20,171,899 8,672,217 2,819,702 6,079,387 1,090,958
Region X (NorMin) 917,840 266,038 139,402 380,116 78,286
Misamis Oriental
173,231 34,528 18,782 97,430 12,833
(excluding CdeO)
Cagayan de Oro
137,465 101,290 6,735 24,200 1,585
City

Base on RA 9003, The Ecological Solid Waste Management Act of 2000, the City, thru CLENRO,
continue on its Information Education Campaign on Waste Segregation to all barangay level.
Material Recovery Facility (MRF) will be constructed in the barangay as mandated in this Act.
Fifty percent reduction of solid waste is expected to be realized.

Table 3.7 shows the projected number of households served by the Garbage Collection System
of the City. Out of the 80 barangays, there are only 16 barangays from the hinterland not served
for the reason that waste disposal is still manageable in these areas. Domestic waste from the
central business district is collected daily while three to four times a week for other areas.

3-8
Table 3.7 Number of HHs served by the City Garbage Collection
YEAR POPULATION VOL/YR (CU.M) HOUSEHOLDS
2014 673,313 331,972.64 140,273.59
2015 691,687 341,031.50 144,101.37
2016 710,561 351,297.39 148,033.61
2017 729,951 359,897.56 152,073.14
2018 749,870 369,718.43 156,222.91
2019 770,332 379,807.29 160,485.92
2020 791,353 391,240.43 164,865.25
2021 812,948 401,916.58 169,364.09
2022 835,131 412,884.07 173,985.69

Majority of the lands in urban and rural areas that are occupied by the informal settlers are
owned by few rich individuals or families in Cagayan de Oro City. Some of the LGU-owned lands
and public lands are also occupied by the ISFs. Most of the landowners tolerated the occupancy
of the informal settler families (ISFs) for years. However, this practice may not be for long
because as the city is progressing with the emergence of new businesses and other economic
opportunities, the prices of the lands began to appreciate. The possibility for ejectment and
demolition is not farfetched due to this trend. There are also privately owned properties
occupied by these ISFs that are being processed for lot purchase by the occupants through
either Community Mortgage Program (CMP) or Localized CMP (LCMP) and Direct Purchase (DP).

The informal Settler Families (ISFs) is estimated to be 46,062 and a total of 34,898 households
are prioritized and or needing relocation.

New Units Needed. In order to address the backlog and to accommodate the doubled up
households due to population increase, new units are needed.

Backlog. Backlog covers the homeless households, the doubled-up households and the displaced
households which is composed of those that need relocation because they either live in danger
zones or areas prone to hazards, or are affected by government infrastructure projects or are to
be demolished or evicted due to court order.

Table 3.8 Summary of New Units Needed Due to Backlog shows 39,304 units of backlog. There is
no data on homeless households or homeless individuals in the City, but it is assumed to be zero
since there are no manifestations of literally homeless people in the City. The backlog is
therefore composed of the displaced totaling to 34,898 households and the doubled–up units or
sharers, numbering about 4,406 households. These data reveals that 88.79% of the backlog is
displaced units while 11.21% is doubled–up. The table further reveals that between 2016 and
2020, there is a need to produce 490 new units annually to serve the doubled–up households,
while a lot of units have to be provided annually in varying numbers as seen in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8 Summary of New Units Needed due to Backlog

Total % to Total Backlog Program
Period
Doubled-up (3.082 % of HS) 4,406 11.21 2014-2022
Displaced 34,898 88.79 2014-2022
Homeless 0 0.00
TOTAL 39,304 100.00

3-9
Table 3.9 below shows the detailed location and specific number of households that compose
the backlog. The table also shows the number of HHs that is targeted to be addressed annually
from 2014-2022.

Table 3.9 Number of Units Needed Annually Due to Backlog

Total Annual Program
Period
Doubled-up (3.082 % of HS) 4,406 490
Homeless 0
Displaced 34,898

Puntabon, Bonbon 91 6634 2014

(Puntabon Golden Circle Landless Association)

Isla Bognao, Consolacion 108

(Bognao Village Association Inc BOLAI)

Barra, Macabalan 82
(NagkahiusangKabussaBaybayonsa Barra NAKABA)

San Juan Seaside,Puntod 70

Riverbank, Puntod 21

Barra, Macabalan 80

Sendong victims – Totally Damaged 1386

(Owners, Renters, Shares)

Sendong Victims – Partially Damaged 3197

(Owners)

Zone 1, Balulang 31
(Strong Peaceful Landless Association)

Bonbon, Bayabas 34

Zone 5, Bonbon 26

Purok 4, Tambo, Carmen 43

Carmen to Barangay 7 101

Fatima, Lapasan 226

Seaside, Kolambog, Lapasan

52
San Isidro, La paz Ext, Lapasan
(Lapasan Urban Settlers Tribal Association LAUSTRILA)
18
Seaside, Lapasan
48
Barangay 35 and 36
93
Purok 5, Gusa
26
Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project
(San Lazaro, Lapasan Section) 95

Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project

(Seaside, Kulambog, Lapasan Section) 29

Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project

(Gusa Section) 26

3-10
 Total Annual Program
Period

Zone 5, Tin-ao, Agusan 7

Greenheights, Balulang 89
(Greenheights Balulang Landless Assoc Inc)

Greenheights, Balulang (Emmanuel Soco WOD) 4

Centro A, Camaman-an 20

Gumamela Ext, Carmen (Ramon del Puerto WOD) 9

Zone 5, Cugman (Mariano Nocom WOD) 15

Zone 4, Cugma (Tamparong WOD) 4

Riverside, Balacanas, Puntod 10

(Francisco Macabale WOD)

Osmena Ext, Brgy 26 (Ethelwaldo Maandig WOD) 15

Corrales Street, Brgy 40 (Teresita Bontia WOD) 7

Sto. Nino, Cogon (Rhenee Mahinay WOD) 2

Tablon, CDO (Rosalio Curbo et al WOD) 48

Zone 6, Agusan (Tom Racaza WOD) 8

Purok 12, Tablon (Carlo Arce WOD) 165

Brgy 12, Montecarlo, Pabayo-Yacapin Sts 6

(Yolanda Valdon Aneneon WOD)

M. Vega St; Consolacion 13

Kauswagan (for ejectment) 14

Sta. Cruz, Lapasan (for ejectment but no writ) 22

Zone 3 Airport, Lumbia 12

V. Roa Luna St, Brgy 27 88

(Oro Christian Residents Landless Assoc)

Sto. Nino Church, Brgy 31 (Chavez) 50

Cemetery Area, Barangay 40 68

Pagatpat (Roa Estate) 13

Upper Kolambog, Lapasan 19

(Upper Kolambog Lapasan Landless Assoc)

Buntong, Camanman-an 43
Downhill St, Zone 4, Agusan 9 11,046 2015

Carinogan, Balulang 34
(CarinoganBalulang Road & Riverside Landless
Association CABRILLA)

Carinogan, Balulang 62
(Carinogan Riverside Muslim and Christian United)

Zone 5, Bonbon 79

3-11
 Total Annual Program
Period
(Nipalane Neighborhood Landless Association)
*applied for peso peso but in danger area

Zone 7, Riverside, Bulua 39

Zone 8, Riverside, Bulua 32

Zone 8, Bulua 23
(Fishpond Site Landless Association)

Zone 2, Carmen 8

Isla Delta, Consolacion

(NagkahiusangKabussa Delta) 201

District 3, Consolacion
(Blue Ice Village Association Inc) 102

Zone 2, Riverside, Cugman 115

(Zone 2 Riverside Landless Association)

Zone 10, Cugman 132

Purok 3B, Gusa 235

(United Riverside Assoc)

Purok 1A, Gusa 72

Purok 3A, Gusa 23

Balacanas, Puntod 129

Padayon Pilipino, Riverside 171

Purok 3, Tablon 55

Purok 13, Tablon 47

Purok 1A, Tablon 31

Purok 1, Tablon 17

Tambo, Canitoan 24

Zone 8, Bulua 36
(Sapang Creek Bulua Landless Association)

Zone 9, Bulua 41
(Sapang Creek Bulua Landless Association)

Creekside, Camaman-an 24

MacanhanCreekside, Carmen 64
(Macanhan Developed Creekside Landless Association
PAMANA)

Purok 4, Tablon 50

Bolonsiri, Camaman-an 28

RDCP Drainage, 70
Camaman-an

Zone 8, Seaside, Bulua 38

(Zone 8 Bulua Seaside Landless Association)

3-12
 Total Annual Program
Period

Seawall, LUPSUP, Lapasan 31

Upper Kolambog, Lapasan 121

(Upper Kolambog Lapasan Landless Assoc)

Accretion, Macabalan 30

Parola, Macabalan 40

Punta, Macabalan 48

Sitio Lumbia beside Airport 51

Zone 2, Cugman (Natl Road encroachers as listed by 9

DPWH Region X)

Piaping Itom, Macabalan 9

Mendoza Ext, Puntod 28

(Mendoza Ext N’hood Organization)

V. Roa St, Brgy 30 8

Piaping, Puti, Macabalan 22

Phase 1 A3, Macanhan,Carmen 6

San Juan II to Lambago, Lapasan 41

Purok 3, Gusa (quarrying site) 1,111

Hillside, Lapasan 85
(Kapunungan sa walay yuta)

Zone 5, Mambuaya 33

Kamang, Salimbal, Binagud, Lapog, Dungguan, 733

Tignapoloan

Sendong Victims – Partially Damaged 232

(Renters and Sharers)

Sendong Victims – Flooded (50% of total) 5,273

(Owners)

Zone 8, Bulua 20

Pinikitan, Camaman-an 27

Bolonsiri, Camaman-an(actual occupants of PAG-ASA) 19

Zone 8, Upper Dagong, Carmen 24

(San Miguel Urban Occupant Association)

Macanhan, Creekside Carmen 33

Balacanas, Dist 6, Consolacion (Balacanas District 6 28

Landless Association)

Balacanas, Consolacion 45
(Balacanas Consolacion Urban Poor Association)

Upper Purok 4-B, Gusa 19

3-13
 Total Annual Program
Period
Zone 6, Kauswagan 4

San Juan II, Lapasan 11

Biasong, Macasandig 28
(Biasong Urban Poor Association formerly Daughters of
Mama Mary)

Construction of the flood control along Cagayan de Oro 33

River Project, Brgy Macabalan

Construction of the flood control along Cagayan de Oro 7

River Basin Project, Brgy Puntod Section I

Construction of the flood control along Cagayan de Oro 30

River Basin Project Brgy Puntod Section

Purok 6, Gusa 109

(Purok 6 Urban Poor Settlers Assoc WOD)

Purok 4, Tablon (Creekside Landless Assoc) 38

Purok 12, Tablon (Carlos Arce WOD) 305

Bontong, Camaman-an (Floro Onando WOD) 43

Puli Creek, Canitoan 8

Bongbongon, Kauswagan 8

San Juan Seaside Puntod (PPA Claimant Areas) 305

LOBALand, Balulang 142 10,398 2016

(Lower Balulang Landless Neighborhood Association)

Purok 1A, Tablon 59

(Tablon Old River Urban Poor TORUPA)

Purok 3 Cluster, Riverview, Gusa 47

Lower Manggahan, Balulang, 146

(Lower Manggahan Urban Poor Landless Assoc)

Purok 1, Gusa 126

Purok 3, DAO, Gusa 77

Purok 13, Tablon 117

Purok Extension, Tablon 14

Isla Canitoan 9

Purok 4, Tablon 41

Zone 1, Agusan 29

Underbridge, Kauswagan 27

MacanhanCreekside 28
(back of Macanhan Elementary School)

Binonoan Creek, Carmen 140

3-14
 Total Annual Program
Period
Purok 5, Puerto 129

Paglantaw, Camaman-an 16

Macanhan Hillside Carmen 446

(MDCLA Casares Hillside, Back of Bliss)

Macanhan Hilltop, Carmen 190

Zone 8, Cugman 88
(Bukana Neighborhood Association)

Lapasan(LUPSUP) 4

Purok 3, Puerto 234

Purok 1, Puerto 41

Purok 2, Puerto 54

Purok 4, Puerto 82

Gumamela Ext, Carmen 44

P2, Cluster Manggga, Gusa 31

Gaabucayan St, Agora, Lapasan 8

Piaping Puti, Macabalan 23

Rivera St, Brgy 30 15

Purok 1 & 7, Balubal (roadcuts) 227

Balongis, Sitio Manggahan, Balulang 510

Ramonal, Mahayag, Camaman-an 239

Indahag quarrying site 417

Lumbia 146

Macasandig 34

Sitio Batingay, Sitio Proper Pagalungan 19

20th – 21st Street, Nazareth 150

(San Jose United People Landless Assoc)

Sendong Victims – Flooded

Owners, 5,272
Renters, 318
Sharers 137

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (ZUCLAI) 156

Sto. Nino Agora Lapasan (WOD) 41

San Lazaro, Lapasan 70

(San Lazaro Indigenous Neighborhood Assoc)

Lambago, Lapasan (United N’hood Assocaition) 27

Zone 1, Highway, Bulua (WOE) 9

3-15
 Total Annual Program
Period
Osmena Ext corner Gaabucayan Sts. Lapasan 5

Zone 8, Bulua (for ejectment) 8

Upper Palawan, Camaman-an 41

(Upper Palawan Camaman-an Landless Assoc)

Camp Evangelista, Patag 22

(Lot 4319-A 1st Batch)

Camp Evangelista, Patag 61

(Lot 4319-A 2nd Batch)

Camp Evangelista, Patag 48

(Lot 4318-B)

LKKS Drive, Barangay 34 (Isalama Industries) 22

Zone 2, Kauswagan (for demolition) 10

Manuel Vega St, Consolacion 2

Zone 11, Upper Carmen (Golden Boulevard 198 917 2017

Homeowners)
16
Purok 3, Gusa (WOD)
8
San Roque, Lapasan (Lapasan Landless Assoc)
156
La Paz Ext, Lapasan (WOD)
22
St. Ignatius, Macasandig (Paglaum Landless Inc)
124
Camp Evangelista, Patag (Lot 4319-B 2nd batch)
80
Camp Evangelista, Patag (Lot 4319-B)
15
Vicante Roa St, Barangay 32
26
Yacapin Extension, Barangay 36
17
Zone 1B, Iponan (for demolition)
12
Zone 5, Bugo
243
Airport Lumbia (BECHOA)

Burgos – del Pilar Streets, Barangay 17 23 498 2018

Zone 7, Riverside, Bulua 52

Zone 5, Cugman (Binuligay Landless Assoc) 11

Gaabucaya Extension, Agora, Lapasan 6

Piaping Puti, Macabalan (MUUPHAI) 151

Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4353 35

Sitio Wak-wak, Patag 72

Sto. Nino, Barangay 31 50

Barangay 31 (New Brgy Hall) 9

3-16
 Total Annual Program
Period

Hayes Extension, Barangay 36 19

Zone 9, Patag 16

Zone 4, Upper Bulua 54

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (HUCHAI) 169 2,413 2019

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Carmen Paradise) 188

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (UCARE) 78

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (Justice Crusader) 77

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (UCLAI) 159

Zone 10B, Upper Carmen (UCARE) 189

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (UCARE Paradise) 225

Zone 12, Upper Carmen(UCARE Zone 12) 228

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (UZLAI) 333

Zone 12, Upper Carmen 188

(Upper Zayas Landless Association UZLAI)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen 151

(Mano-mano Landless Association)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (LNAI) 87

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (LAHI) 40

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (with WOD) 83

Mandumol, Macasandig 60

Acebedo Street, Puntod (with WOE) 21

Zone 6, Carmen (Pag-asa Landless Assoc) 114

Abellanosa Street, Barangay 18 16

Yacapin Extension, Barangay 36 7

Upper Dagong, Carmen 43 626 2020

Zone 10, Upper Carmen 45

(Golden Highway Association)

Zone 6, Diao Subd, Bonbon 15

Tipolohan, Camaman-an 23

Zone 8, Carmen 11

Villarin St, Carmen 19

Zone 3, Cugman 27

Zone 6, Kapisnon, Kauswagan 22

2nd Street, Nazareth 6

3-17
 Total Annual Program
Period
28th Street, Nazareth 14

Barangy 29 15

J. Ramonal Street, Barangay 32 129

Hayes Street, Barangay 36 58

Burgos Street, Barangay 17 18

Tierra del Puerto, Camaman-an 181

COLRAI, Macabalan 594 1002 2021

Upper Bontong, Camaman-an 45

Bontong, Camaman-an 22

Agora, Lapasan (IPLAN-LB) 71

Crossing Tibasak, Macasandig 30

Sitio Kawayan, Patag 10

Abellanosa St, Barangay 17 48

Vicente Roa St, Barangay 28 49

Sto. Nino, Barangay 31 69

Licoan, Barangay 25 55

Zone 6, Bayabas 9
20th – 21st Streets, Nazareth 522 1364 2022

Purok 14, Tablon (TABUKNAI) 225

Purok 10, Tablon 21

Zone 6, Bonbon (VSC) 22

Zone 5, Bugo 167

Zone 2, Upper Bulua 12

San Miguel Village, Lapasan 25

LKKS Drive, Brgy 35 342

9th – 22nd Street, Nazareth 28

Future Need. The average annual population growth rate of the City is 2.69 percent
based on the NSO data of 2000 to 2010. Using this growth rate, the population increase
was projected for the planning period of 2014 to 2022 as shown in Table 3.10. Thus the
number of new units needed every year due to population growth has also been
projected as seen in the succeeding table (Table 3.11).

3-18
Table 3.10 Population Projection
Base Year 1st Planning 2nd Planning 3rd Planning
Period Period Period
2013 2014 2016 2019 2022
Population 648,438 665,881 702,187 760,392 823,421
Households 147,372 151,337 159,588 172,816 187,141
Average HH 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
size(4.355)

Table 3.11 New units needed due to Future Need (population growth)

TOTAL ANNUAL
I. Planning Period (2014-2016) 12,216 4,072
II. Planning Period (2017-2019) 13,228 4,409
III. Planning Period (2020-2022) 14,325 4,775
TOTAL 39,769

Table 3.12 shows that the total new units needed due to backlog and future need is 79,073. The
table likewise presents that the total number of units that needs to be addressed gradually
increases throughout the planning period.

Table 3.12 New Units Needed Due to Backlog and Population Growth per Planning Period
PLANNING PERIOD HOUSING UNITS NEEDED

Due to Due to Total %

Backlog Population
Growth
(1st)2014-2016 3 years 29,545 12,216 41,761 52.81
nd
(2 )2017-2019 3 years 5,297 13,228 18,525 23.43
rd
(3 )2020-2022 3 years 4,462 14,325 18,787 23.76
TOTAL 39,304 39,769 79,073 100.00

Table 3.13 presents the annual number of units that need to be produced or provided in order
to cope with the total new units needed due to backlog and population increase. The planners
decided to prioritize the displaced units over the doubled up households in terms of provision of
shelter since their location demands urgency due to the dangers posed by various hazards, both
natural and legal. Thus the addressing of the shelter needs of these displaced units immediately
starts depending on the availability of units. Doubled up households will be attended to in ten
years’ time despite their being fewer in number.

3-19
Table 3.13 Total new units needed annually due to backlog and population growth
Home Population Annual Total for the
Year Doubled-up Displaced
less Increase Total planning period
2014 489 6634 0 4,072 11,195
2015 489 11046 0 4,072 15,607 41,761
2016 489 10398 0 4,072 14,959
2017 489 917 0 4,409 5,815
2018 490 498 0 4,409 5397 18,524
2019 490 2413 0 4,409 7312
2020 490 626 0 4,775 5891
2021 490 1002 0 4,775 6267 18,788
2022 490 1364 0 4,776 6630
TOTAL 4,406 34,898 39,769 79,073 79,073

Upgrading Needs

Upgrading needs cover three main categories of needs; tenure upgrading need, infrastructure
upgrading need and structural upgrading need.

Tenure Upgrading Needs. In Cagayan de Oro the number of HHs needing tenure upgrading
totals to 248 as shown in the table below. The City plans to upgrade the status of these HHs by
2014 through different schemes such as the Community Mortgage Program, direct purchase
scheme and other similar programs.

Table 3.14 Upgrading Needs: Tenure

Location of Units Needing Tenure Upgrading % of housing Total Program
stock Period
0.17% 248 2014
F.S. Catanico 173
UKLLAI, Lapasan 75
TOTAL 248
Housing Stock = 142,966

Infrastructure Upgrading Needs. There are several aspects of infrastructure when it comes to
shelter. This consists of the power and water systems, the roads and roads access and the
drainage system. Likewise categorized here are the related social services such as garbage
collection and disposal and the sanitary facility.

Since units with readily available power distribution line provided by legitimate power providers
is considered as adequate power supply, the number of households needing electrical upgrading
only accounts to 358 HHs as shown in Table 3.15.

3-20
Table 3.15 Upgrading Needs: Power
Location of Units w/o Adequate % of housing stock Total Program Period
Power Supply 0.25% 358
Mahogany Village 140 2014
Tabang Cagayan – Lumbia 78 2014
Christian-Muslim, Balulang 25 2014
Tignapoloan 20 2014
Lutheran, Calaanan 58 2014
Talongan, Calaanan 37 2014
Housing Stock = 142,966

Safe drinking water supply and a safer environment has been established in the City due to the
presence of an efficient water supply. Thus for the year 2014 as shown in Table 3.16, the City
plans to assist 89 HHs in upgrading the access to potable water supply from the local water
district or through a communal government installed deep wells.

Table 3.16 Upgrading Needs: Water

Location of Units w/o adequate % of housing Total Program Period
water supply stock
0.06% 89
F.S. Catanico 25 2014
KM8, Kawayan, Lumbia 30 2014
Tignapoloan 34 2014
Housing Stock = 142,966

Adequate sanitary facility is vital in uplifting the health and environment of the City. It has been
known that sanitary facilities in blighted areas are in need of improvement. In Table 3.17 it has
been known that 3,239 HHs needs assistance from the government to upgrade their sanitary
facility.

Table 3.17 Upgrading Needs: Sanitary Facility

Location of Units w/o % of housing Total Annual Program Period
adequate Sanitary Facility stock
2.27% 3,239 2014-2020
Dabatian Ext, Carmen 4 41 2014
Zone 6, Kauswagan 8
Agusan 1
Zone 6, 2 & 4 Bulua 8
Zone 1, Bulua 5
Apovel, Bulua 7
Looc Macajalar, Camaman-an 4
Moco, Carmen 1
Zone 2, Kauswagan 1
Talisay, Lapasan 1
Amor 3, Macabalan 1
KM 8, Lumbia 10 233 2015
Zone 9, Macanhan 128
Dabatian Ext; Carmen 4
Centro Kolambog, Lapasan 4

3-21
 Location of Units w/o % of housing Total Annual Program Period
adequate Sanitary Facility stock
2.27% 3,239 2014-2020
Centro Kolambog, Lapasan 22
KM5, Lumbia 9
Zone 5, Carmen 6
Kapisnon, Kauswagan 4
Camp Alagar, Sector 1, Lapasan 8
Zone 5, Balite, Puerto 2
Purok 5, Tablon 7
J. Rivera St, Brgy 27 15
Lapaz I Seaside Lapasan 14
Patpat, Lumbia Urban Poor 30 389 2016
Manggahan (Carcosa) 16
Zone 1, Bayabas 17
Zone 1, Bayabas 27
Zone 8, Bonbon 26
Imburnal, Palawan 18
V. Castro, Carmen 6
Sta. Cruz, Carmen 9
Zone 9, Macanhan 15
Zone 5, Cugman 12
Z6, Kapisnon, Kauswagan 7
Purok 4, Tablon 44
Z7, Sapong, Tablon 14
Purok 4, Tablon 42
Purok 2, District 4, Canitoan 10
Zone 10, Lower Carmen 14
Gumamela Ext; Carmen 10
Macanhan, Carmen 11
Zone 3, Carmen 13
Zone 10, Carmen 10
San Roque, Lapasan 12
Sitio Mabuhay, Lumbia 13
Cabula, Lumbia 13
Zone 3, Bugo 36 327 2017
Zone 8, Bulua 9
Zone 1, Carmen 9
Zone 9 , Carmen 7
Zone 2, Cugman 24
Purok 3, Gusa 21
Purok 4, Puerto 25
Purok 1, Tablon 10
Tignapoloan 15
Zone 8, Bulua 18
Zone 7, Bulua 12
Zone 2, Lower Bulua 23
Zone 8, Bulua 32
Zone 2, Lower Bulua 18
Zone 2, Lower Bulua 2
Zone 8, Bulua 8
Zone 2, Lower Bulua 13
Zone 3, Upper Bulua 22
Purok 3A, Gusa 23
BICUPHAI Slum 120 913 2018
Malinawon, Puntod 20
St. John, Puntod 50
Villa Verde, Balulang 120
Gmelina, Bayabas 30
Buara, Bayabas 26

3-22
 Location of Units w/o % of housing Total Annual Program Period
adequate Sanitary Facility stock
2.27% 3,239 2014-2020
Zone 10, Bulua 25
Zone 2, Lower Bulua 16
Tierra del Puerto 16
V. Castro, Carmen 21
Zone 4, Kauswagan 17
Zone1, Buara, Bayabas 10
Mahayahay, Bayabas 29
Zone 7, Bulua 37
Zone 1, Bulua 32
Purok 2, Canitoan 15
Puli, Calaanan 17
District 2, Consolacion 27
District 4, Consolacion 24
Zone 8, Cugman 16
Zone 3, Cugman 12
Indahag 27
Western Kolambog, Lapasan 26
Western Kolambog, Lapasan 15
Lumbia 26
Aluba, Macasandig 29
Mandumol, Macasandig 26
Purok 13, Tablon 41
Purok 6, Tablon 43
KIRABA, Bayabas 35 307 2019
Zone 4, Agusan 46
Sone 6, Agusan 38
Zone 3, Bugo 20
Purok 3, Gusa 27
Purok 1, Gusa 21
Kolambog, Lapasan 59
Lapaz I N’hood, Lapasan 36
B4, Puntod 25
Palalan, Tablon 34 1029 2020
Carinogan, Balulang 53
Upper Balulang 23
Zone 6, Cugman 86
Zone 8, Cugman 34
Zone 8, Cugman 46
Purok 2A, Gusa 69
Purok 4A, Gusa 39
Purok 2B, Gusa 48
Zone 3, Purok 2B, Gusa 63
Purok 5, Gusa 81
Purok 3A, Gusa 152
Purok 3B, Gusa 55
Purok 7, Gusa 20
Purok 8A, Gusa 63
Zone 6, Lapasan 77
San Juan Mauswagon, Puntod 86

The need for road and road access in accordance with the minimum standards set or prescribed
by BP220 needs to be applied to most housing project sites. The number of HHs needing such
upgrading is shown in Table 3.18. It can be seen in the table that there are 7,955 households
that are potential for displacement due to climate change impact. These households are
occupying areas that are projected to be prone to flood in the future. However, majority, if not

3-23
all of them are owners of the land they occupy. Due to this, relocation is not the primary option.
Instead, the LGU plans to upgrade the roads and provide access roads to and from the sites they
are occupying in order for them to have access to safer grounds and life lines in case of calamity.

Table 3.18 Upgrading Needs: Road Access

Location of Units w/o adequate road access % of Total Annual Program
housing Period
stock
5.76% 8,232
Zone 4, Bugo 122 122 2015
St. John, Puntod 77 155 2020
Malinawon, Puntod 78 2020
No. of HHs that are potential for displacement due 7,955 2022
to climate change impacts (pls refer to worksheet 1)
Housing stock = 142,966

A total of 10,571 households need upgrading of drainage system (see Table 3.19). This need will
be attended to in 2020 and 2022. The LGU still has to come up with a drainage plan that can
address the volume of water, such as those brought about by Typhoon Sendong. Subsequently,
the LGU will request and/ or source out funds for this endeavor since this will require a large
amount of resources. These prerequisites are the basis for the 2020 and 2022 time frame.

Table 3.19 Upgrading Needs: Drainage Facilities

Location of Units w/o % of Total Annual Program Period
adequate Sanitary Facility Housing
Stock 2020-2022
7.39% 10,571
Balubal 218 4,695 2020
Bugo 122 2020
F.S. Catanico 173 2020
Veterans, Lapasan 101 2020
BOHAI, Macasandig 22 2020
Balangay Pangandoy, 85 2020
Macasandig
Padayon, Pilipino, Puntod 54 2020
Isla Copa, Consolacion 118 2020
Vega, Consolacion 181 2020
Paradise, Bonbon 111 2020
KAHOA, Kauswagan 109 2020
Iponan SHP 175 2020
Centennial, Mambuaya 111 2020
Tignapoloan 34 2020
Christian-Muslim, Balulang 241 2020
Lower Balulang 57 2020
Macanhan, Carmen 1369 2020
URUMAI, Carmen 44 2020
UMNAI, Carmen 77 2020

3-24
PAMANA, Carmen 105 2020
AENA, Carmen 61 2020
AEHA/ZONACAR, Carmen 15 2020
Accretion, Macabalan 375 2020
Malinawon, Puntod 78 2020
Lumbia Airport Residents 245 2020
Ass
Patpat, Lumbia Urban Poor 58 2020
LUPSUP, Lapasan 356 2020
HHs belonging to Category 5 1,896 5,876 2022
HHs belonging to Category 6 3,980 2022
Housing stock = 142,966

Regular garbage collection is already implemented in the urban and rural barangays of the City
and the 17-hectare sanitary landfill is fully operational. Thus, it is considered as an adequate
garbage disposal system.

Structural Upgrading Need refers to the need to improve or repair structures or dwelling units
so as to make it resilient to the effects of climate change. It covers makeshift houses, dilapidated
structures and structures needing major repair. According to NSO data in 2010, 4.05% of
dwelling structures in Cagayan de Oro needs structural upgrading. In 2013, the base year for this
plan, there are 142,966 occupied dwelling units in the city and, assuming the same percent of it
needs upgrading, there is an estimated 5,690 dwelling units that need structural upgrading. This
will be attended to between 2016 to 2022, making 965 units as target for upgrading every year
(see Table 3.20).

Regular monitoring or inspection by the Office of the City Building Official will be conducted to
ensure the safety and resiliency of the structures.

Table 3.20 Upgrading Needs: Structural Upgrading

UPGRADING NEEDS % of housing Total Annual Program Period
stock
3. Structural improvement
need
(4.05% of housing stock) 4.05% 5,790 965 2016-2022
Housing Stock = 142,966

3-25
 Chapter 4

ASSESSMENT OF AFFORDABILITY

There are six categories of target households for assistance according to their affordability to
pay for the housing facility. The following assumptions are drawn in assigning the income
groupings:

Ø The 1st income group is composed mainly of trisikad / motorela drivers, fishermen,
house help, street/market sweepers, waiters/waitresses, salespersons, laborers and
odd jobs earning below the poverty threshold which is P9,604.

Ø The 2nd income group covers jeep/taxi/bus/van drivers, heavy equipment operators,
skilled laborers, home based computer-related jobs, small scale entrepreneurs,
security guards earning P9,605 up to P15,000.

Ø The 3rd income group includes Government/private employees, realty brokers,

entrepreneurs, insurance agents earning P15,001 up to P30,000.

Ø The 4th income group comprises government/private employees, OFW-domestic and

laborers, medium scale entrepreneurs with income ranging P30,001 up to P45,000.

Ø The 5th income group includes government/private employees, OFWs holding

technical and supervisory level with income of P45,001 up to P60,000.

Ø The 6th income group is consisted of government /private employees holding

managerial positions and above, large scale entrepreneurs, professional
practitioners like doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers, CPAs and others with
monthly income ranging P60,000 and above.

Out of the six income groups, only the first, second and third or the first three lower income
groups are considered as beneficiaries or target population as mentioned in Chapter 1. The
criteria to determine the income bracket of target households for housing is based on the
National Household Targeting System (NHTS) and the criteria used for the affordability is the
Family Income & Expenditure Survey (FIES). For the remaining income groups composed of 4th,
5th and 6th income group households, the LGU will leave it to the private sector or any financing
institutions to address their need because the limited resources of the LGU will be focused only
to the poorer segment of its populace. The LGU will just lend support to the private sector that
will venture into provision of housing for the middle and upper income through local policies
and programs that will aid the private sector shelter provider with ease in processing of local
requirements.

Table 4.1 shows that out of 79,073 new units needed due to backlog and population growth for
the period 2014 to 2022, approximately 20% or 15,815 are needed by the 1st income group, 22%
of 17,396 new units are in the 2nd income group, 27% or 21,350 new units in the 3rd income
group, 19% or 15,024 new units for the 4th income group, 10% or 7,907 new units for the 5th
income group and 2% or 1,581 new units for the 6th income groups, respectively.

4-1
Also, Table 4.1 shows the various percentages of the household income that can be used for the
housing payment. Based on their income and the percentages of income for housing, the
affordable loans were computed using the prevailing loan terms of the government housing
programs. For the first income group, the affordable housing loan is P79,286.40; for the 2nd
income group it should not exceed P203,199.00; for the 3rd income group affordable housing
loan is P371,655.00; for the 4th income group can avail of loan in the amount of P629,316.00; for
the 5th income group can avail housing loan of P686,221.20 and for the 6th income group
affordable loan is approximately P1,225,395.00.

Loan term for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd income groups is 6% per annum payable in 30 years, the 4th
income group has a loan term of 7% per annum payable in 25 years; while the 5th and sixth
income groups both have a loan term is 10% per annum payable in 25 years.

4-2
Table 4.1 Affordability Analysis and Land Need Calculation
Income Group 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th
Income (minimum, 9,604 9,605- 15,001- 30,001- 45,001- 60,000
maximum) & Below 15,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 & Above
% of new units 20 22 27 19 10 2
Number of units 79,073 15,815 17,396 21,350 15,024 7,907 1,581
Typical monthly income 4,800 12,302.00 22,500 37,500 52,500 75,000
Potential % of income
for upgrading / new
10 10 10 12 12 15
housing
Potential capital cost
for housing:
Monthly 480 1,230 2,250 4,500 6,300 11,250
Annually 5,760 14,762 27,000 54,000 75,600 135,500
Loan Terms
* Interest rate 6% 6% 6% 7% 10% 10%
* Repayment period,
30 years 25 years
years
Affordable housing loan 79,286.40 203,199.00 371,655.00 629,316.00 686,221.20 1,225,395.00
Estimated Monthly
475.36 1,218.29 2,228.30 4,447.87 6,235.70s 11,135.17
Amortization
Affordable option A B C D E F
Land Area per unit 66.67 66.67 108 108 46.30 46.30
(Lot size) 40 40 70 70 9.26 9.26
Required Funding (B) 1.42 4.01 7.49 10.54 5.52 1.46B
Required land (in has.) 105.44 116.00 230.58 162.26 36.61 7.32
LAND REQUIREMENT FOR THOSE BELOW POVERTY THRESHOLD: 105.44 HECTARES
TOTAL LAND NEED FOR ALL INCOME GROUPS IN 2013-2022 = 658.21 HECTARES
4-3
Affordable Housing Options

There are six housing options or designs for the various income groups. These housing options
are shown in Table 4.2 in the succeeding page.

For the 1st income group, Option A is recommended. It costs P215,790 for a 40 sq. meter
developed lot at P400/sq meter. The land development is estimated at P600/sq.m. will cover the
construction of concrete / asphalt road, drainage canal (open), power and water lines. Housing
construction cost is egged at P6,000/sq.m. The housing component is a row house with an area
of 21 sq. m. The housing component is loftable with toilet and bath, roofing and walls. Since the
affordable loan is computed to be only P79,286.40, this option is way above the affordability of
the first income group. It is being proposed that the land development will be fully subsidized by
the local government unit and graduated amortization schedule will be implemented to start at
P480 per month which is the current affordability of the target households. The monthly
amortization will then be increased in accordance with the anticipated increase in income of the
target income group.

For the 2nd income group, Option B is recommended. It costs P314,765.00 for a 70 sq.m.
developed lot. Land cost is pegged at P780/sq.m. and development is estimated to be P600 per
square meter. Housing component cost is P6,000/sq.m. for a single-attached 22 sq.m. shell
house with roofing, walls, toilet and bath.

For the 3rd income group, Option C is recommended. It costs P378,269 for an 80 sq.m. lot at
P780/sq.m and land development pegged at P600/sq.m. The housing component is single-
detached with an area of 28 sq.m. with roofing walls, toilet and bath.

For the 4th income group, Option D is recommended. It costs P339,430.00 for an 80 sq.m. lot size
costing P780/sq.m. Land development is P600/sq.m. Housing component is 30-square meter
duplex with toilet, bath, roofing, walls and floor. This is cheaper than the option for the third
income group because the loan term is shorter.

For the fifth and sixth income groups, a Medium Rise Building (MRB) is recommended. Each
building will have four floors, each story will accommodate nine units. The fifth income group
will have a floor area of 18 square meters, while the sixth income group will have 24 square
meters. The unit for the fifth income group is estimated to cost P657,507.20; while the MRB
unit for the sixth income group will cost P724,707.00. Both of these units are affordable to the
intended income groups.

Based on the design of NHA for standard MRBs, there will be 6 buildings in a hectare. Thus, for
the total of 9,490 units belonging to the 5th and 6th income groups, approximately 44 hectares
are needed.

4-4
Table 4.2 Affordable Housing Options

Options House Lot Total Land Cost (P) Land Development House Construction Indirect Total Unit
Size Size land Cost (P) Cost (P) Cost Cost
(m2) (m2 ) (m2) /m2 /unit /m2
/unit /m2
/unit (12%) (P)
A. ROW HOUSE w/
Land Dev’t.
(fully subsidized by 21 40 66.67 400.00 26,668.00 600.00 40,002.00 6,000.00 126,000.00 23,120.00 215,790.00
LGU)
– 1st Income Group
B. SINGLE ATTACHED
22 70 108.00 780.00 84,240.00 600.00 64,800.00 6,000.00 132,000.00 33,724.00 314,765.00
– 2nd Income Group

C. SINGLED
DETACHED – 3rd 28 80 123.00 780.00 95,940.00 600.00 73,800.00 6,000.00 168,000.00 40,529.00 378,269.00
Income Group.

D. DUPLEX -
30 80 123.00 400.00 49,228.00 600.00 73,842.00 6,000.00 180,000.00 36,368.00 339,430.00
4th Income Group

E. MRB (4-STOREY) –
24.00 9.26 46.30 5,000.00 231,500.00 1,200.00 55,560.00 15,000.00 300,000.00 70,447.20 657,507.20
5th income group

F. MRB (4-STOREY) –
24.00 9.26 46.30 5,000.00 231,500.00 1,200.00 55,560.00 15,000.00 360,000.00 77,647.00 724,707.00
6th income group

4-5
4-6
 Chapter 5

ASSESSMENT OF RESOURCES FOR SHELTER PROVISION

During the preparation of the Shelter Plan of Cagayan de Oro City, the primary resources that
are being assessed are land, provision of infrastructure, basic services relevant to shelter,
housing finance including community organizing, social mobilization and livelihood.

Land

Cagayan de Oro City has a total land area of 57,851 hectares. In the proposed general land use,
the urban land use of the City summed up to 12,123.47 hectares or 20.96% of the total land
area. The residential area is the largest in the urban land use and covers approximately 9,183.19
hectares or 75.75% of the total proposed urban land use and represents 15.87% of the total land
area of the City.

Lands that are deemed suitable and available for housing have been inventoried and the city
government still continues to look for additional lands for this purpose. However, excluded from
the inventory are the following: the irrigable and irrigated rice lands and other lands not allowed
and not compatible for construction of houses such as danger zones (e.g. along the rivers,
creeks, no build zones, seashores, and landslide prone areas) and affected by the infrastructure
project. Listed below in Table 5.1 are the lands identified as suitable and available for housing
based on their actual status, ownership and the strong possibility of the owner’s interest to
venture into the housing industry. There are some private owners that offer their lands with an
affordable amount to the City Government.

Table 5.1 Lands Available and Suitable for Housing (as of 2014)
OWNER AREA LOCATION ZONING STATUS
(HAS.)
Secure Savings & Loans 2.0818 Bugo S9 Agri Idle land
Association
Union Bank 3.1580 Agri
Mary Chan 8.0268 Puerto S7 Medium Cassava/
Density REDTL Residential/
idle

Josefina Venadas 6.0000 Puerto S6 Agro-Industrial Idle land

Rodrigo Lim Jr. 12.0936 Puerto S5 Agro-Industrial Idle land

Petra Capistrano 9.4500 Puerto S3 Agri Idle land

RosanoJayso 2.9646 Puerto S3 Agri Idle Land

Flabiano Linian 2.9147 Puerto S3 Agri Idle land

5-1
 OWNER AREA LOCATION ZONING STATUS
(HAS.)
Felisa Tamparong 1.4455 Cugman S2 Medium
Density REDTL Idle land
AJ Land Const.Corp. 8.2008 Cugman S7

Pedro Roa 5.6482 Cugman S7

AJ Wood products 3.0861 Cugman S6

Icoson Lim 2.0000 Cugman S6

AJ Land 3.2000 Cugman S7

Joselito Torayno Sr. 2.0000 Cugman S6

Alwin Lim 3.1979 Cugman S5

OPB Realty Corp. 4.2543 Agusan S6 Medium
Density REDTL
CFMB Realty Corp. 2.0000

Silver Swan Factory 2.0055

Mariche Dev. Corp. 2.5012 Lapasan S6 Medium Idle land
Density REDTL
Ariel Tan 2.5161

DBP 2.2949 Iponan S5 Medium Idle

Density REDTL
Marcelino Maagad 2.2628 Iponan S5

Pedro Roa 2.1100 Iponan S6

Fortunato Ramonal 17.6361 Iponan S6 Agri

Pedro Roa 1.8345 Tablon S2 Medium Idle land
4.1022 Density REDTL
2.3478
9.2525
5.4298

Proserfina Carlson et. Al. 1.6668 Tablon S7

Angel Quimpo et. Al. 5.4182 Tablon S2

5.9966
4.0810
5.8509

Guazon Rodriguez Inventory 5.2482 Tablon S2

Corp. 5.5048

Florencio Boholst. 12.8055 Tablon S2

5-2
 OWNER AREA LOCATION ZONING STATUS
(HAS.)
Reolito Lao 17.4041 Tablon S2

PNB 3.7454 Tablon S9

3.8984

Ravidas et. Al. 4.0000 Tablon

Sergiavda. De Ayupan 2.0437 Tablon S7

Glen Go 4.3936

Cantalego Cawagan 2.9000 Tablon S11

Gregory Po 3.3000 Tablon S9

Carino Caare 3.5400 Tablon S9

PNB 4.3013 F.S. Catanico Medium Idle land
S2 Density REDTL

Star Asset Management 4.7975 F.S. Catanico

S2
Veronica Borja 10.1360 Gusa S8 Medium 5 hectares
Density REDTL (rolling)
Felisa San Jose 2.1565

PFJ Construction 3.1199

5.4213
Manuel Tan 2.7547

Ricardo Allado 2.0366

Angela McNeil 2.5021

Florante Baguio 3.3764

Juan Borromeo 3.1938 Gusa S9

Alfredo Lim 2.5272

AAN Co. et. al 9.6647

PNB 8.7020 Cliff/portion

(Bigaan)
Trinidad Go 3.4000

Roperto Capistrano 3.4001

Araceli Roa 6.0364

5-3
 OWNER AREA LOCATION ZONING STATUS
(HAS.)
Liza Olano 2.6130 50% idle
3.5619 50% idle
2.0226 50% idle
3.0000 50% idle

Felisa Tamparong 2.3917 Idle/coco land

Paterno Gallanes 1.8860 Macapaya, Medium Idle/
Camaman-an Density REDTL ideal for
housing
Rosalinda Jao Tan 23.0520 San Isidro, Agri 30% relatively
Lumbia flat
70% rolling

Antonio Montalba 17.8960 Lumbia Idle/ideal for

housing

Heirs of Mariano Batar 4.6800

Patpat,
Heirs of Rizal Gador 10.8500 Lumbia Mango trees

Rolanes Gabutina 13.5300 Lumbia Mixed crops

Rabanes et.al. 9.0000 Sto. Nino, Agri Idle
Indahag
Sps. Avancena / Cecilio Inovero 11.2940 Balulang Agri Idle
Cevera / Cecilio / Novero 6.7230 Pagatpat Agri Idle
Lagsa et. Al / Jaylani Alonto 20.0970 Bayanga Agri Idle
C/o Pastor Quirino Saluna 21.0000 Lumbia Agri Idle

C/o Pastor Quirino Saluna 9.0224 Lumbia Idle

Robert Lee 23.0000 Lumbia Agri For
53.0000 development

TOTAL 543.9590

Table 5.2 below shows the comparison between the land needed and land available for housing.

Based on the affordability analysis and land need calculation considered by the planner in Table
4.1 the total land needed for all income groups in 2014 to 2022 is 658.21 hectares. It is assumed
that the needs of those belonging to the 4th up to the 6th income groups of about 206.18
hectares, or equivalent to 31.32% of the total, will be taken care of by the private developers.

The needs of those belonging to the 1st to 3rd income groups, which total to 452.01 hectares or
about 68.67%, will be the priority of the Local Government. The total 105.44 hectares needed
for the 15,815 households belonging to the 1st income group (or those below the poverty

5-4
threshold level) shall be the top priority of the Local Government. In order to ensure the
availability of land for the second and third income groups during the nine-year planning period,
the LGU will pursue the joint venture agreement with the national government housing agencies
(NGAs), the active non-government organizations (NGOs), housing developers and the
landowners. In summary, Table 5.2 implies that land is sufficient for the target potential
beneficiaries.

Table 5.2 Comparison of Land Available and Land Requirement

Total Land Needed (ha.)
Total Land Available
1st – 3rd 4th – 6th Remarks
(ha.)
TOTAL Income Income
Group Group
Land is sufficient for the 1st, 2nd
and 3rd income groups but not
sufficient for the total of
543.9590 658.21 452.01 206.20
79,073 households for the next
9 years)
(Deficit = 114.251 has.)

Infrastructure

Power. Based on the assessment, the service providers can sufficiently respond to the needs
within the planning period. Cagayan de Oro Electric Power and Light Company Inc. (CEPALCO)
covers the Poblacion area (Barangays 1 to 40), and 26 non-Poblacion Barangays namely: Agusan,
Balubal, Balulang, Bayabas, Bonbon, Bugo, Bulua, Camaman-an, Carmen, Consolacion, Cugman,
F.S. Catanico, Gusa, Indahag, Iponan, Kauswagan, Lapasan, Macabalan, Macasandig, Nazareth,
Patag, Puerto, Puntod, Tablon, while MORESCO 1 covers 16 non-poblacion barangays namely:
Baikingon, Bayanga, Besigan,Dansolihon, Mambuaya, Pagalungan, Pagatpat, Pigsag-an, San
Simon, Taglimao, Tagpangi, Tuburan, Tumpagon, Tignapoloan. Both CEPALCO and MORESCO 1
serve Barangays Lumbia and Canitoan.

As shown in Table 5.3 the capacity of CEPALCO and MORESCO 1 can serve additional 7,500 and
5,700 households every year respectively. The total new units needed due to backlog and
population growth shows that there is an increase every year. Every three years there is an
upgrading of the existing houses to have their own connection from the power provider. In
summary the total annual need throughout the planning period is 79,431.

5-5
Table 5.3 Assessment of Power Need vs. Capacity of Power Provider
NO. OF UNITS NEEDED ANNUALLY
NEW UNITS
(Refer to UNITS FOR
CAPACITY Table 3.13 UPGRADING
OF SERVICE Total new (Refer to
SERVICE PROVIDER units Table 3.15
YEAR TOTAL REMARKS
PROVIDER ANNUALLY needed No.& ANNUAL
(No. of HHs annually Location of NEED
served) due to HHs Needing
backlog Upgrading
and of Power
population Facility)
growth)
CEPALCO/ 7,017 103
2014 11,195 11,533 sufficient
MORESCO 1 6,949 235
CEPALCO/ 11,376 -
2015 15,607 15,627 sufficient
MORESCO 1 11,265 20
CEPALCO/ 11,962
2016 14,959 - 14,959 sufficient
MORESCO 1 11,846
CEPALCO/ 12,320
2017 5,815 - 5,815 sufficient
MORESCO 1 12,083
CEPALCO/ 12,689
2018 5,397 - 5,397 sufficient
MORESCO 1 12,325
CEPALCO/ 13,070
2019 7,312 - 7,312 sufficient
MORESCO 1 12,571
CEPALCO/ 13,462
2020 5,891 - 5,891 sufficient
MORESCO 1 12,822
CEPALCO/ 13,866
2021 6,267 - 6,267 sufficient
MORESCO 1 13,078
CEPALCO 14,282
2022 6,630 - 6,630 sufficient
MORESCO 1 13,340
Total 216,323 79,073 358 79,431
Note: For the past five years, CEPALCO’s number of customers grew at an average of 3% per year or around 4,000
customers per year. However, CEPALCO is capable to serve any additional customers even beyond the 3% growth.

Water. Cagayan de Oro City Water District (COWD) has two sources of water supply, namely:
from its production wells and from the bulk supply of Rio Verde. Its total production from both
water sources is more than enough to supply the projected annual needs considering that the
total annual water consumption in the previous two years comprises only 60-61 percent of the
supply from its production wells and only about 44 percent of the total production from both
sources.

Table 5.4 below support the above statement that COWD can sufficiently provide the annual
water need during the entire planning period.

5-6
Table 5.4 Assessment of Potable Water Need vs Capacity of Water Provider
NO. OF UNITS NEEDED ANNUALLY
NEW
UNITS UNITS FOR
(Refer to
CAPACITY OF UPGRADING
Table
SERVICE (Refer to
3.13Total
SERVICE PROVIDER Table 3.16
YEAR new units TOTAL REMARKS
PROVIDER ANNUALLY No.& Location
needed ANNUAL
(No. of HHs annually of HHs NEED
served) due to Needing
backlog Upgrading of
and Water
population Facility)
growth)
2014 COWD 546,692 11,195 55 11,250 sufficient
2015 COWD 561,398 15,607 34 15,641 sufficient
2016 COWD 576,499 14,959 - 14,959 sufficient
2017 COWD 592,007 5,815 - 5,815 sufficient
2018 COWD 607,932 5397 - 5397 sufficient
2019 COWD 624,285 7312 - 7312 sufficient
2020 COWD 641,079 5891 - 5891 sufficient
2021 COWD 658,068 6267 - 6267 sufficient
2022 COWD 675,507 6630 - 6630 sufficient
Total 5,483,467 79,073 89 79,162

Sanitation. The Socio Economic Profile of 2012 portrays that about six and 69/100 percent of the
107,005 households surveyed by the City Health Office (CHO) have unsanitary or without toilets
at all. In the past, plastic toilet bowls were given as dole out by CHO to the poor and deserving
households. Lately, due to budgetary limitations and as part of its Primary Health Care Program,
the CHO has started coordinating with the Barangay Officials for a demonstration on toilet bowl
making, utilizing those identified households that are with unsanitary or without toilets, as the
participants. Regular demonstration schedule in concerned barangays and monitoring is a must
to ensure the upgrading issue.

Regarding the needs of the new units as presented in Table 5.5, these will be taken care of
during the housing construction, regardless of location through regular monitoring and
enforcement of the building guidelines by the Office of the Building Official (OBO).

5-7
Table 5.5 Assessment of Need for Toilet Facility vs Capacity of Service Provider
NO. OF UNITS NEEDED ANNUALLY
UNITS FOR
NEW UNITS UPGRADING
CAPACITY
(Refer to Table (Refer to
OF SERVICE
3.13 Total new Table 3.17
SERVICE PROVIDER TOTAL
YEAR units needed No.& Location REMARKS
PROVIDER ANNUALLY ANNUAL
annually due to of HHs
(No. of HHs NEED
backlog and Needing
served)
population Upgrading of
growth) Sanitary/Toilet
Facility)
2014 CHO 11,236 None 41 41 sufficient
2015 CHO 15,840 (All new units are 233 233 sufficient
2016 CHO 15,348 with housing 389 389 sufficient
2017 CHO 6,142 component and 327 327 sufficient
2018 CHO 6,310 the sanitary 913 913 sufficient
2019 CHO 7,619 facility is already 307 307 sufficient
included in the
2020 CHO 6,920 1029 1029 sufficient
estimated cost of
2021 CHO 6,267 - - sufficient
house
2022 CHO 6,630 - - sufficient
construction
Total 82,312 3,239 3,239

Roads. Table 5.6 shows that the LGU, national agencies and private developers are the providers
for the road upgrading needs of the households; however, this road is included in the program
of the city.

Table 5.6 Assessment of Need for Roads vs Capacity of Service Provider

NO. OF UNITS NEEDED ANNUALLY
NEW UNITS UNITS FOR
CAPACITY
(Refer to Table UPGRADING
OF SERVICE
3.13 Total new (Refer to Table
SERVICE PROVIDER
YEAR units needed 3.18 No.& TOTAL REMARKS
PROVIDER ANNUALLY
annually due to Location of ANNUAL
(No. of HHs
backlog and HHs Needing NEED
served)
population Upgrading of
growth) Roads/road
access)
2014 LGU / 11,195 None - - sufficient
2015 National 15,729 (All new units 122 122 sufficient
2016 agencies / 14,959 are with land - - sufficient
2017 private 5,815 development - - sufficient
2018 developers 5,397 component and - - sufficient
2019 7,312 the roads w/n - - sufficient
2020 6,046 the project sites 155 155 sufficient
2021 6,267 are already - - sufficient
included in the
2022 14,585 7,955 7,955 sufficient
estimated cost
Total 87,305 land 8,232 8,232
development)

5-8
Drainage. The LGU, national agencies and private developers are the provider for the drainage
system for the households in residential areas. However, as of this moment the LGU has an on-
going upgrading and de-clogging of the existing drainage canals in the city in order to solve the
present flooding during the rainy season. The City Government of CdeO is preparing a Drainage
Master Plan in order to improve the existing drainage system. Table 5.7 shows that the LGU is
highly capable of responding to the need for drainage since it can serve a total of 89,644
households in a span of three years (2020-2022) while the number of households needing such
service is only 10,571.

Table 5.7 Assessment of Need for Drainage vs Capacity of Service Provider

NO. OF UNITS NEEDED ANNUALLY
CAPACITY UNITS FOR
NEW UNITS
OF UPGRADING
SERVICE (Refer to
(Refer to Table
SERVICE PROVIDER Table 3.19
YEAR 3.13 Total new TOTAL REMARKS
PROVIDER ANNUALLY No.&
units needed ANNUAL
(No. of Location of
annually due NEED
HHs HHs Needing
to backlog and
served) Upgrading
population
of Drainage
growth)
System)
LGU / 11,195 (All new units - - sufficient
National are with land
15,607 - - sufficient
agencies / development
private 14,959 component - - sufficient
developers and the
2020 5,815 - - sufficient
drainage
5,397 system w/n - - sufficient
7,312 the project - - sufficient
sites are
10,586 already 4,695 4,695 sufficient
6,267 included in - -
2022 the
12,506 estimated 5,876 5,876 sufficient
cost land
Total 89,644 development) 10,571 10,571

Garbage Disposal. The City Government of CdeO has an existing Memorandum of Agreement
with the private entity to collect the garbage within the urban areas; however, in the rural areas
garbage disposal is being taken care of by the barangay. The CLENRO Office has conducted series
of training or orientation regarding the Republic Act No. 9003, which is Ecological Solid Waste
Management Act of 2000 to different barangays of the city. As to where to dispose the garbage,
there is a 17-hectare sanitary landfill which is already fully operational and can adequately
absorb the domestic wastes of the households within the city.

5-9
HOUSING FINANCE

Based on the computed cost of the affordable housing options in Table 4.2, it would need P28.4
Billion pesos to provide the necessary new housing units to 79,073 households.

Table 5.8 Financial Requirements Needed for New Housing

Income Group No. of Unit Cost Total Cost
Option
Units (P) (P)
st A. ROW HOUSE w/ Land
1 Income Group Dev’t.(fully subsidized by LGU) 15,815 215,790.00 3,412,718,850.00
nd
2 Income Group B. SINGLE ATTACHED 17,396 314,765.00
5,475,651,940.00
rd
3 Income Group C. SINGLED DETACHED 21,350 378,269.00 8,076,043,150.00

th
4 Income Group D. DUPLEX - 15,024 339,430.00 5,099,596,320.00

th
5 Income Group E. MRB (4-STOREY) 7,907 657,507.20 5,198,909,430.40

th
6 Income Group F. MRB (4-STOREY) 1,581 724,707.00 1,145,761,767.00

TOTAL 28,408,681,457.40

As shown in Table 5.9, the possible sources of funds include: the National Housing Authority
(NHA), Home Development Mutual Fund (HDMF/Pag-ibig), SHFC, DBP, Landbank, Private
Developers (including balanced housing per RA 7279), Tax on Idle Lands and Housing
collections/reflows.

Table 5.9 Potential Sources of Funds for Shelter Provision

Agency/ Estimated Initial
Name of Program Component
Organization Amount (P)
LGU o Under 20% Development 2M
Fund
o 70% CDRRMF Land Banking 5M
o Taxes on Idle Lands (for -
Implementation)
o Housing collection/reflows -
NHA o Resettlement o Land Dev & House 24M
o Slum Upgrading Construction
o Calamity Housing o Improvement of Site 24M
o Development & House 20M
Construction
Pag-Ibig o LGU Pabahay o Land Devt and House 20M
Construction
o Retail Financing o Acquisition of Lot / House 20M
o Group Land Acquisition and & Lot
Development (GLAD) o Acquisition of Land
SHFC Community Mortgage Program Land Acquisition; Land Dev % 24M
& House Construction

5-10
 Agency/ Estimated Initial
Name of Program Component
Organization Amount (P)
DBP Housing Land Acquisition
Landbank Housing Loan Land Acquisition / House
Construction
Private 5M
Developers
Micro Financing Housing Loans Land Acquisition / House
Institutions Construction
Foreign Funds

5-11
 Chapter 6

WORK AND FINANCIAL PLAN

To realize the goals of the City Shelter Plan, a Work and Financial Plan was formulated
based on the shelter needs that surfaced during the Local Shelter Plan Workshop sponsored by
the UN Habitat, in cooperation with the Housing and Urban Development Council (HUDCC).

The table in the next page shows the details of the Work and Financial Plan which to be
completely implemented needs a varied source of funds for the period 2014-2022. The funds are
not solely for the implementation of the housing projects but likewise for the many other
activities in preparation, implementation and monitoring of the said plan. The table also shows
the detailed strategies and programs or activities that are vital to the realization of the various
objectives of the Shelter Plan. The different program, projects and activities that are spelled out
or identified as regular functions or tasks of the agencies are denoted with asterisk.

The goals of the city which is the upliftment of socio-economic condition by empowering
the citizenry for a safe, healthy and secured community integrating the principles of Disaster
Risk Reduction – Climate Change Adaptability (DRR-CCA), as well as the rationalization and
institutionalization of shelter/housing office, are kept in mind as the objectives of the plan is
formulated.

Goals

1. The upliftment of socio-economic condition by empowering the citizenry for a safe,

healthy and secured community integrating the principles of DRR-CCA.
2. The rationalization and institutionalization of shelter/housing office.

6-1
Table 6.1 Work and Financial Plan, 2014-2022
RESOURCES NEEDED SCHEDULE
OBJECTIVE STRATEGY PROGRAM/ PROJECT/ ACTIVITY RESPONSIBLE WHAT? HOW HOW FUND NEEDED
AGENCY MANY? MUCH? SOURCE
Goal 1. The upliftment of socio-economic condition by empowering the citizenry for a safe, healthy and secured community integrating the principles of DRR-CCA
1. To acquire/ 1.1 Landbanking 1.1.1 Inventory of additional available TFSHD * * * 2014
access/ develop lands
CPDO
658.21 has. of land 1.1.2 Secure list of potential sites from CPDO * * * 2014
for housing and CPDO and City Assessor’s Office (CAO) CAO
resettlement
beginning 2014 1.1.3 Perform records or documents City Legal Office * * * 2014
until 2022 analysis of potential sites to establish its CPDO
legal status in order to come up with a
CAO
shortlist of suitable sites

1.1.4 Ocular inspection of sites included TFSHD * * * 2014

in the short list to validate suitability CPDO
(terrain, RROW, drainage, outfall,
CAO
distance from main lines of basic services,
etc)
1.1.5 Final inventory of suitable lands CPDO * * * 2014
CAO
1.1.7 Negotiate with landowners of City Legal * * * 2014-2020
suitable sites for possible purchase, City Budget
donation, or joint venture. CMO

6-2
 1.1.8 Acquisition of the land CMO 658.21 has. 2B CdeO 2014-2020
TFSHD Private
CTO Developers
City Budget (PD)
City Legal Foreign
Funds
1.2 Develop new sites 1.2.1 Design development plans of LGU CEO * * * 2014-2020
for housing (vacant properties (detailed engineering plans for
lands, newly acquired land development and housing)
lands, lands already 1.2.2 Allocate budget to develop new City Budget * * * 2014
owned by LGU) sites
1.2.3 Implement development plan / CEO 658.21 has. 2.7B CdeO 2014-2020
construction CPDO NHA
TFSHD PD
1.3. Network with 1.3.1 Make a ready menu of possible sites CMO 4.1B CdeO 2014
private developers to and project interventions where the City Legal NHA
access their 20% private developers can choose from their
CPDO PD
socialized housing participation and compliance with Sec.18
counterpart to of RA 7279 TFSHD
augment the land and
housing finance
resources of the city

2. To reduce the 2.1 Masterlisting of 2.1.1 Survey and mapping of HHs per CPDO 4,406 220,300 CdeO 2014
doubled-up doubled-up HHs barangay to identify the doubled-up Brgy Officials
households (HHs)
BHWs
by 489 units
annually. 2.1.2 Prepare a masterlist of doubled-up CPDO * * * 2014
HHs which can be made as reference in
beneficiaries prioritization and selection

6-3
 2.2 Provide housing 2.2.1 Review and enhance qualification CPDO * * * 2014
units for doubled-up criteria and list of requirements for City Legal
HHs doubled-up HHs applying for new housing
CdeOHB
SP
2.2.2 Screening of applications based in CPDO * * * 2014
compliance with set requirements CdeOHB
2.2.3 Awarding of housing units to CMO * * * 2014-2022
qualified beneficiaries CPDO
2.2.4 Relocate doubled-up households CPDO 4,406 400M CdeO 2014-2022

3. To relocate 3.1 Review masterlist 3.1.1 Survey and mapping of HHs per CPDO * * *
34,898 displaced of displaced HHs barangay to validate or confirm the BHWs
HHs from 2014- number and location of displaced HHs to
2022 date
3.1.2 Prepare an updated masterlist of CPDO * * *
displaced HHs and correlate this with the CdeOHB
CCVAA results and other information
which can be made as reference in
beneficiaries prioritization and selection
3.2 Provide housing 3.2.1 Review or enhance qualification CdeOHB * * *
units for displaced criteria and list of requirements for
st nd rd
HHs (1 ,2 , and 3 displaced HHs applying for new housing.
income group) 3.2.2 Screening of applications based on CdeOHB * * *
compliance with set requirements CPDO
3.2.3 Awarding of housing units to CMO * * *
qualified beneficiaries
3.2.4 Relocate displaced HHs CEO 34,898 25B CdeO, PD, 2014-2022
CPDO NHA

6-4
4. To facilitate the 4.1 Community 4.1.1 For ISF residing in LGU-owned CPDO * * * 2014
provision of mobilization property: Validate records regarding TFSHD
security of tenure housing program beneficiaries of the City
to 248 HHs needing whose land tenure security is not yet
tenure upgrading granted.
by 2014 4.1.2 For ISFs residing in private CPDO * * *
properties: TFSHD
a. Ascertain interest of ISF to purchase CLENRO/DENR
the land they are occupying
b. Identify the owners of private lands
occupied by ISF and assist in the
negotiation for lot purchase in favor of
present occupants

4.1.3 Initiate, process and facilitate land CPDO * * *

ownership to beneficiaries

4.1.4 Organize ISFs and facilitate their * * *

HOA registration with the HLURB

4.1.5 Assist HOA in accessing housing CPDO * * *

finance through CMP, direct purchase or TFSHD
other means
4.1.6 Prepares masterlist of beneficiaries CPDO * * *
who have complied with documents & TFSHD
pre-occupancy / occupancy orientation

4.1.7 Capability building for community CPDO * * *

organizers TFSHD
CSWD

6-5
 4.1.8 Giving of Entry Pass to qualified CPDO * * CdeO 2014-2022
beneficiaries

5. To upgrade the 5.1 Facilitate the 5.1.1 Finalize and validate names and CPDO 358HHs 35,800 CdeO 2014
power facility of implementation of locations of HHs needing upgrade of TFSHD (10,000
358 HHs by 2014 upgrading of power power facility per HH)
facility by the power 5.1.2 Coordinate with TFSHD * * * 2014
providers CEPALCO/MORESCO I regarding their CPDO
capacity to serve the number of identified
HHs in their corresponding locations (all
on-site)
5.1.3 Conduct information drive and TFSHD * * *
advocacy to educate the HHs about the CPDO
power upgrading project and the rights
and responsibilities of the HHs under the
project
6. To upgrade / 6.1 Facilitate the 6.1.1 Finalize or validate names and TFSHD 89HHs * * 2014
provide access to implementation of locations of HHs needing upgrading of CPDO
potable water to 89 upgrading of water water facility:
HHs by 2014 facility by legitimate a. For COWD installed water facilities:
water providers Coordinate with COWD to serve the
number of identified HHs in their
respective locations
b. Design water reservoir and distribution CEO CdeO
lines per project site
6.1.2 Construction of deep well, water CEO * * *
reservoir and distribution lines to HHs per
project site
6.1.3 Conduct potability tests and water CHO * * *
treatment regularly

6-6
 6.1.4 Turnover the completed main water CMO * * *
lines to COWD for maintenance and
operation.
6.1.5 Conduct information drive and * * *
advocacy to educate the households
about the water upgrading project and
the rights and responsibilities of the HHs
under the project
7. To upgrade / 7.1 Masterlisting of 7.1.1 Survey and mapping of HHs per CPDO * * *
toilet facility to HHs needing barangay to validate or confirm the
3,239 HHs starting upgrading of toilet number and location of HHs needing
2014-2022 facility upgrading of toilet facility.
7.1.2 Prepare a masterlist of HHs needing TFSHD * * *
toilet facility
7.2 Provide / upgrade 7.2.1 In coordination with the CHO, CHO * * *
toilet facilities of COWD and NGOs working the identified CEO
affected HHs project areas, formulate prioritization
CPDO
criteria in the implementation of
upgrading of toilet facilities

7.2.2 Design a project package for toilet CPDO 3,239 6.5M CdeO 2014-2022
facility upgrading CEO DOH
CHO PD
7.2.3 Implement the sanitary facility * * *
upgrading project
7.3 Educate HHs on 7.3.1 Conduct information drive and CHO * * *
sanitation advocacy to educate the HHs about the Brgy Officials
sanitary facility upgrading project and the
responsibilities of the HHs under the
project

6-7
8. To upgrade 8.1 Identify the 8.1.1 Measure, quantify the existing roads CPDO 8,232 73M CdeO 2015-2022
existing roads or existing roads to be for upgrading CEO PD
provide access upgraded (all within * * *
8.1.2 Provide plans for upgrading CPDO
roads to 8,232 HHs existing project sites)
starting 2014-2022 CEO
8.1.3 Implement the plans CEO * * *

8.2 Identify locations 8.2.1 Measure, quantify the possible CPDO * * *

to put up new access access roads CEO
roads * * *
8.2.2 Provide plans for new access roads CPDO
CEO
8.2.3 Implement the plans CEO * * *

8.3 Advocate with 8.3.1 Make a ready menu of possible sites CMO * * *
private developers to of roads that the private developers can City Legal
use their 20% develop as their participation and
CdeOHB Housing
socialized housing compliance with Sec.18 of RA 7279
Dev
counterpart to
develop roads /
construct access roads
within the housing
project sites

9. To upgrade 9.1 Identify the sites 9.1.1 Measure, quantify, assess the CPDO 10,571 110M CdeO 2020-2022
existing drainage which needs drainage existing drainage for upgrading or CEO Private
system or provide / upgrading of construction Developers
drainage to a total drainage (all within (e.g. Pagatpat and Calaanan)
of 10, 571 HHs existing project sites)
starting 2020-2022

6-8
 9.2 Advocate with the 9.2.1 Make a ready menu of possible sites CMO * * *
private developers to of the drainage that the private City Legal
use their 20% developers can develop as their
LHB
socialized housing participation and compliance with Sec.18
counterpart to of RA 7279 Housing Dev
develop / construct
the drainage within
housing project sites

10. To ensure 10.1 Ensure existing 10.1.1 Conduct assessment of the CHO * * CdeO 2014-2022
proper garbage garbage collection is operation of sanitary landfill CLENRO
collection and implemented
disposal of all HHs 10.2 Identify 10.2.1 Continue information drive on CLENRO * * *
barangays with proper Solid Waste Management
garbage collection and
disposal system

11. To aggressively 11.1 Design an 11.1.1 Create a special body to design and City Legal 5,790 * CdeO 2016-2022
advocate for evaluation system to implement the evaluation system CMO, OBO
structural assess structural * * *
11.1.2 Conduct structural assessment of CEO
upgrading of 5,790 stability of existing
dwelling units OBO
dilapidated houses units
to make it resilient
to hazards brought 11.2 Provide 11.2.1 Identify HHs qualified for structural * * *
about by climate information and/or upgrading based on results of structural
change training on structural assessment
upgrading /
11.2.2 Prioritization of HHs for assistance * * *
retrofitting /
construction
11.2.3 Access budget and technical CEO * * *
assistance (from other agencies) for the
implementation of structural upgrading /
retrofitting training

6-9
 11.3 Facilitate 11.3.1 Inform HH beneficiaries of the * * *
structural upgrading extent of assistance of the LGU and their
responsibilities under the project

12. To enforce 12.1 Implementation 12.1.1 Re-orient existing laws / OBO * * CdeO 2014-2022
summary eviction. of existing ordinance: ordinances on barangay level CEO
Ordinance #6854-99
Brgy Officials
against illegal
structures and Sec.28
of RA 7279
13. To facilitate 13.1 Public-private 13.1.1 Skills training and Provision of seed CID * * CdeO 2014-2022
access to partnership tapping capital CSWD/DSWD
employment & National Government
PESO
income generating agencies for funding &
activities of training TESDA
household
beneficiaries.

Goal 2. To rationalize and institutionalize the Shelter or Housing Office.

1. To put in place 1.1 Adoption and 1.1.1 Spearhead the finalization of the CPDO Addendum to 1M CdeO 2014-2022
local policies, local enactment of the CSP and present it for adoption to the existing city
SP
institutions and Shelter Plan through ordinance
proper bodies CMO CdeO
mechanisms to an EO or ordinance to Honorarium 10M 2014-2022
implement the be used as the guide
Cagayan de Oro in all shelter programs 1.1.2 Conduct regular updating of the
City Shelter Plan and projects of the shelter plan based on results of
City monitoring and impact assessment done
by the monitoring team

6-10
1.2 Reactivation and 1.2.1 Reorientation on duties, power and CdeOHB
strengthening of the composition of the CdeOHB
Cagayan de Oro 1.2.2 Inclusion of necessary CPDO
Housing Board representatives from other agencies and CdeOHB
organizations for more effective function

1.2.3 Scheduling of CdeOHB regular

meeting
1.2.4 Creation of the TWG to support CMO
CdeOHB in terms of formulation of CdeOHB Chair
policies, project proposals, plans,
programs and projects
1.3 Creation of 1.3.1 Draft EO creating the City Housing City Legal
Cagayan de Oro City Office (CdeO-DUDH) with accompanying CPDO
Department of Urban budgetary requirements for approval and City Budget
Development and
adoption of the Shelter Plan
Housing (CdeO-DUDH)
with corresponding
budget by virtue of an 1.4.1 Access technical assistance from the CdeOHB
ordinance shelter agencies and other bodies to
capacitate staff of the housing office
(community organizing, estate
management, etc)

1.4.2 Provision of necessary equipment to

operate the CdeO-DUDH

1.5 Creation of the 1.5.1 Institute proper and regular CMO

Monitoring Team by monitoring and evaluation of the
virtue of an EO implementation of the CdeO City Shelter
Plan

6-11
 1.5.2 Conduct regular monitoring and Monitoring
evaluation of the implementation of the Team
Shelter Plan based on the annual targets,
using the monitoring forms designed by
the CSP Core Group
1.5.3 Conduct impact assessment of the Monitoring
housing projects implemented Team

1.6.2 Come up with official pricing and SP

schedule of amortizations for every / all
housing projects
1.6.3 Formulation of Omnibus Guidelines City Legal
governing all housing projects, including SP
the terms, conditions and penalties

1.6.4 Design an efficient collection CSWD

scheme / system that is convenient to the City Treasurer
beneficiaries being served
*Those with asterisks are an ongoing/regular functions of the agencies involved, thus, no budget is reflected in the LSP because there already are budget for these
activities from the funds of the implementing agencies/on-going programs.

6-12
 Chapter 7

MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) is the process of data gathering and analyzing housing
related information that will enable the Decision Makers as well as the Cagayan de Oro Housing
Board to determine the progress of the implementation of the City Shelter Plan and make timely
decision to ensure that progress is maintained according to schedules and targets.

The City Planning and Development Office shall be primarily responsible in carrying out
data gathering and analysis but whose work shall be reviewed by the Cagayan de Oro Housing
Board.

The Cagayan de Oro Housing Board shall submit annual report to the Local Chief
Executive of the status of the City Shelter Plan.

7-1
 ANNEX 1
LOCATION & NUMBER OF AFFECTED FAMILIES/HHs

LSP Worksheet No. 1

1. Families/HHs in danger /hazardous areas

Type of Danger/Hazard Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of

(Flood, landslide, etc.) Families/HHs
Riverside Downhill St. Zone 4, Agusan Occupants letter request for possible 9
relocation
LOBALand, Balulang (Lower Balulang Landless Velez (for lot acquisition/ danger area) 142
Neighborhood)

Carinogan, Balulang (Carinogan Balulang Road Private (Tamparong) (for lot 34

& Riverside Landless Assn. CABRILLA) acquisition/danger area)

Carinogan, Balulang (Carinogan Riverside Private (Tamparong) (for lot 62

Muslim and Christian United) acquisition/danger area)

Zone 5, Bonbon (Nipalane Neighborhood Private (Gomos et. al.) (for lot 79
Landless Assn.) *applied for peso peso but in acquisition/danger area)
danger area

Puntabon, Bonbon (Puntabon Golden Circle Private (Reynaldo Floirendo) 91

Landless Assn.)

Zone 7, Riverside, Bulua Public (danger area) 39

Zone 8, Riverside, Bulua Public (for lot acquisition/ danger area) 32

Zone 8, Bulua (Fishpond Site Landless Assn.) Private (Martha Maalino) (for lot 23
acquisition/danger area)
Zone 2, Carmen Public(danger area-along the river) 8

Isla Delta, Consolacion (Nagkahiusang Kabus sa Public (for lot acquisition) 201
Delta)

District 3, Consolacion (Blue Ice Village Assn.) Public (for lot acquisition) 102

Isla Bugnao, Consolacion (Bognao Village Assn Public (for lot acquisition) 108
Inc BOLAI)

Zone 2, Riverside, Cugman (Zone 2 Riverside Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 115
Landless Assn)

Barra, Macabalan (Nagkahiusang Kabus sa Public (for lot acquisition/danger area) 82

Baybayon sa Barra NAKABA)

San Juan Seaside Puntod Public (danger area/PPA claimed area) 70

Riverbank, Puntod Public (Danger Area) 21

Purok 1A, Tablon (Tablon Old River Urban Poor Private (Marciana Nuevas) (applying for 59
TORUPA) CMP but in danger area)

Zone 10, Cugman Public (danger riverbank) 132

Purok 3B, Gusa (United Riverside Assn) Private (Tamparong) (riverside/danger 235
area)
Barra, Macabalan Public (riverside/danger area) 80

Purok 3 Cluster, Riverview Gusa Public 47

Lower Manggahan, Balulang (Lower Private (Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas) 146

Manggahan Urban Poor Landless Assn)

Purok 1, Gusa Public (riverside/danger area) 126

-1-
 Purok 1A, Gusa Public (riverside/danger area) 72

Purok 3A, Gusa Public (riverside/danger area) 23

Purok 3 DAO, Gusa Public (riverside/danger area) 77

Balacanas, Puntod Public (riverside/danger area) 129

Padayon Pilipino, R Public (riverside/danger area) 171

Purok 3, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 55

Purok 13, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 117

Purok 13, Tablon Public (underbridge/danger area) 47

Purok 1A, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 31

Purok 1, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 17

Purok Extension, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 14

Tambo, Canitoan Public (riverside/danger area) 24

Isla Canitoan Public (riverside/danger area) 9

Purok 4, Tablon Public (riverside/danger area) 41

Zone 1, Agusan Public (riverside/danger area) 29

Underbridge, Kauswagan Public (danger area) 27

Creekside Zone 8, Bulua Public (for lot acquisition) 36
(Sapang Creek Bulua Landless Assn)

Zone 9, Bulua Public (for lot acquisition) 41

(Sapang Creek Bulua Landless Assn)

Creekside, Camaman-an Private (Damasing & Agustina Gonzales) 24

(request for relocation)

Macanhan Creekside, Carmen (Macanhan Public (for lot acquisition) 64

Developed Creekside Landless Assn PAMANA)

Macanhan Creekside Within the 4m easement 28

(back of Macanhan Elem. Sch)

Binonoan Creek, Carmen Public (creek rehabilitation prog) 140

Purok 5, Puerto Public (creekside) 129

Purok 4, Tablon Public (creekside near pilgrim) 50

Bolonsiri, Camaman-an Private (Gayloa) 28J

Seaside/Coastal Zone 8, Seaside, Bulua (Zone 8 Bulua Seaside Public (for lot acquisition/danger area) 38
Landless Assn)

Zone 8, Cugman (Bulcana Neighborhood Assn) Public (for lot acquisition) 88

Seawall, LUPSUP, Lapasan Public (danger zone) 31

Lapasan (LUPSUP) Public (for foreclosure cleaning) 4

Purok 3, Puerto Public (coastal area) 234

Purok 1, Puerto Public (coastal area) 41

Purok 2, Puerto Public (coastal area) 54

Purok 4, Puerto Public (coastal area) 82

-2-
 Upper Kolambog, Lapasan (Upper Kolanbog Private (Dacudao) (danger area) 121
Lapasan Landless Assn.)

Accretion, Macabalan Public (coastal area) 30

Parola, Macabalan Public (coastal area) 40

Punta, Macabalan Public (coastal area) 48

Hillside Paglantaw, Camaman-an Public (for lot acquisition) 16

Macanhan Hillside Carmen (MDCLA Casares Public 446

Hillside, Back of Bliss)

Macanhan Hilltop, Carmen Public (for lot acquisition) 190

Along the Road Gumamela Extention, Carmen Public (road right of way) (for ejectment) 44

Sitio Lumbia beside airport Public (CAAP) 51

Zone 2, Cugman (Natl. Road Encroachers as Public (danger area) 9

listed)

P-2, Cluster Mangga, Gusa Public (road right of way) (by task force 31
demolition)
Gaabucayan St. Agora, Lapasan Public (road right of way) 8

Piaping Itom, Macabalan Public (Pathways/Road Shoulder) 9

Piaping Puti, Macabalan Public (Pathways/Road Shoulder) 23

Mendoza Ext. Puntod (Mendoza Ext Public (Pathways/Road Shoulder/danger 28

Neighborhood Organization) area)

Rivera Street, Brgy. 30 Public (road right of way/open canal) 15

V. Roa St. Brgy. 30 Public (road right of way) 8

Piaping Puti, Macabalan Public (road shoulder/danger area) 22

Phase 1 A3, Macanhan, Carmen RROW (danger area) 6

San Juan II to Lambago Lapasan Public (encroaching the 10m wide road) 41
Drainage RDCP Drainage, Camaman-an Public (request for relocation) 70
Flood (Assumption- Sendong Victims
including no build zone) A. Totally Damaged
Owners 1,298
Renters 67
Sharers 21

B. Partially Damaged
Owners 3,197
Renters 140
Sharers 92

C. Flooded
Owners 10,545
Renters 318
Sharers 137
Landslide Purok 1 & 7, Balubal (roadcuts) Public 227

Balongis, Sitio Manggahan, Balulang Public 510

Ramonal, Mahayag, Camaman-an Public 239

Purok 3, Gusa (quarrying site) Public 1,111

Indahag quarrying site Public 417

Lumbia Public 146

Macasandig Public 34

-3-
 Hillside, Lapasan (Kapunungan sa Walay Yuta) Private (Baconga, Campomayor, Bajas) 85
(for relocation)

Zone 5, Mambuaya Public 33

Sitio Batingay & Sitio Proper, Pagalungan Public 19

Kamang, Salimbal, Binagud, Lapog, Dungguan, Public 733

Tignapoloan
th st
20 -21 Street, Nazareth (San Jose United Public RROW 150
People Landless Assn)
TOTAL 24,813
2. Families/HHs to be affected by infrastructure projects

Type of infra project Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of

Families/HHs
Zone 1, Balulang (Strong Peaceful Landless Private (Heirs of Vicente Castro) (lot 31
Assn) donated to the City Govt. for road
construction)

Bonbon, Bayabas Private (proposed road opening PCCP 34

Bayabas to Raagas Beach, Bonbon)

Zone 5, Bonbon Public (proposed National High School) 26

Zone 8, Bulua Public (Cadastral Road) 20

Pinikitan, Camaman-an Public (proposed road) 27

Bolonsiri, Camaman-an (actual occupants of Public (road widening) 19

PAG-ASA)

Zone 8, Upper Dagong, Carmen (San Miguel Public (Cadastral Road) (for lot 24
Urban Occupant Assn) acquisition)

Macanhan, Creekside Carmen Public (illegal structure on proposed 4m 33

wide road/easement)

Purok 4, Tambo, Carmen Public (proposed Golden Mile) 43

Carmen to Brgy 7 Private (infra affected “Spanish Bridge) 101

Balacanas, Dist. 6, Consolacion (Balacanas Dist. Public (future drainage devt.)(for lot 28
6 Landless Assn.) acquisition)

Balacanas, Consolacion (Balacanas Consolacion Public (future drainage devt.)(for lot 45

Urban Poor Assn) acquisition)

Upper Purok 4-B, Gusa Public (road construction) 19

(farm to market road)

Zone 6, Kauswagan Public (Cadastral Road) (for ejectment) 4

San Juan II, Lapasan Public (infra affected brgy road opening) 11

Fatima, Lapasan Public (30m coastal road) 226

Seaside, Kolambog, Lapasan Public (affected by the construction of 52

coastal road)

San Isidro, La Paz Ext. Lapasan (Lapasan Urban Public (affected by the coastal road 18
Settlers Tribal Assn. LAUSTRILA) construction)

Seaside, Lapasan Public (coastal road) 48

Biasong, Macasandig (Biasong Urban Poor Assn Public (infra affected) 28

formerly Daughters of Mama Mary)

-4-
 Barangay 35 and 36 Private (Chavez) (road opening) 93

Purok 5, Gusa Public (coastal road) 26

Construction of the flood control along CDO 33

river project brgy Macabalan

Construction of the flood control along CDO 7

river basin project bgry Puntod Section 1

Construction of the flood control along CDO 30

river basin project bgry Puntod Section 11

Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project 95

(San Lazaro, Lapasan Section)

Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project 29

(Seaside, Kulambog, Lapasan Section)

Cagayan de Oro Coastal By Pass Road Project 26

(Gusa Section)

TOTAL 1,176
3. Those not affected by 1 & 2 but w/ court order for demolition/eviction
Name of HOAN Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of
Families/HHs
Zone 5, Tin-ao, Agusan Private (Heirs of Guillermo Lumasang) 7
writ of demolition)

Greenheights, Balulang (Greenheights Balulang Public (for lot acquisition/ writ of 89

Landless Assn. Inc.) demolition)

Greenheights, Balulang Private (Emmanuel Soco) (writ of 4

demolition)

Centro A. Camaman-an Private (Alvarez) (writ of demolition) 20

Upper Dagong, Carmen Private (Imperial) (for lot acquisition) 43

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (Golden Highway Assn) Private (Flores) (writ of execution) 45

Gumamela Ext. Carmen Private (Ramon del Puerto) (writ of 9

demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Hilltop Upper Carmen Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 169
Homeowners Assn. Inc.) demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Carmen Paradise) Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 188
demolition)

Zone 10, Upper Carmen Landless Assn. Inc. Private (Imperial Corp.) (applying for 156
(ZUCLAI) CMP)

Zone 11, Upper Carmen (Golden Boulevard Private (Alta Tiera Resources Inc) 198
Homeowners)

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (Upper Carmen Assn Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 78
of Residence Enthusiast UCARE) demolition)

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (Justice Crusader) Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 77
demolition)

Zone 10, Upper Carmen (Upper Carmen Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 159
Landless Assn UCLAI) demolition)

Zone 10B, Upper Carmen (Upper Carmen Assn Private (Imperial Corp.) (writ of 189
of Residence UCARE) demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (UCARE Paradise) Private (Imperial Corp.) (WOD) 225

-5-
Zone 12, Upper Carmen (UCARE Zone 12) Private (Imperial Corp.) 228
(writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Upper Zayas Landless Private (Imperial Corp.) 333
Assn UZLAI) (writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Upper Zayas Landless Private (Imperial Corp.) 188
Assn UZLAI) (writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Mano-mano Landless Private (Imperial Corp.) 151
Assn) (writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen (Landless Private (Imperial Corp.) 87

Neighborhood Assn LNAI) (writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen(Landless Assn Hilltop Private (Imperial Corp.) 40

Inc LAHI) (writ of demolition)

Zone 12, Upper Carmen Private (writ of demolition) 83

Zone 5, Cugman Private (Mariano Nocom) 15

(writ of demolition)

Zone 4, Cugman Private (Tamparong) 4

(writ of demolition)

Purok 3, Gusa Private (Ananias Godia Sr.) (writ of 16

demolition)

Purok 6, Gusa (Purok 6 Urban Poor Settlers Private (Martin Loyola) (writ of 109
Assn PUPSAI) demolition)

San Roque, Lapasan (Lapasan Landless Assn) Private (Marina Labuntog) (motion for 8
execution of judgement & demolition)

Sto. Niño, Agora, Lapasan (Roadside Sto. Niño Private (Agusto Maderazo) 41
Agora Neighborhood Assn Inc) (writ of demolition)

La Paz Ext. Lapasan (Lapasan Extension Private (De Oro Realty Inc.) 156
Landless Assn LELAS) (writ of demolition)

San Lazaro, Lapasan (San Lazaro Indigenous Private (De Oro Realty Inc.) 70
Neighborhood Assn) (writ of demolition)

Lambago, Lapasan (United Neighborhood Assn) Private (Marina Dalmar/ Manuel Lee) 27
(Civil Case No. 2010-293/Proposed Road)

COLRAI, Macabalan (Cagayan de Oro Landless (with court order for ejectment) 594
Residents Assn)

Mandumol, Macasandig (Sta. Cruz Macasandig Private (Ricardo Maandig) (with court 60
Homeowners Assn) order for ejectment)
th st
20 -21 Sts. Nazareth Private (Antonio dela Canara) (with court 522
order for ejectment)

Riverside Balacanas, Puntod Private (Francisco Macabale) (for lot 10

acquisition/writ of demolition)

Balacanas, Puntod (Balacanas Riverside CDO Private (Ms. Macabale (Plaintiff) vs 66

Landless Assn BRCDOLAI) Disamparados Nazareno & Letecia Tapia)

Acebedo Street, Puntod Private (PNB) (Writ of Demolition) 21

Purok 14, Tablon (Tablon Bukana of CDO Private (Carlos Arce) (for lot 225
Neighborhood Assn TABUKNAI) acquisition/writ of demolition)

Purok 4, Tablon (Purok 4 Creekside Landless Private (Pilgrim Christian College) (writ 38
Assn) of demolition)

-6-
 Purok 12, Tablon (Purok 12 Tablon Seaside Private (Carlos Arce) (writ of demolition) 305
Residents Assn)

Burgos-del Pilar Sts. Brgy. 17 Private (Lina Salcedo) (with court order) 23

Osmena Ext. Brgy 26 Private (Ethelwaldo Manadig) 15

(writ of execution)

Corrales St. Brgy 40 Private (Teresita Bonita) 7

(writ of demolition)

Zone 1, Highway Bulua Private (Jovito Fabela) (writ of execution) 9

Zone 7, Riverside, Bulua (Zone 7 Riverside Private (Nicolas Galimpin) 52

Landless Assn) (writ of execution)

Sto. Nino, Cogon (Rhenee Mahinay et al) Private (Heirs of Carmen Chavez Abaya) 2
(writ of demolition)

Tablon, CDO (Rosalio Curbo et al) Private (Pilgrim Christian College) (writ 48
of demolition)

Bontong, Camaman-an (Floro Onando et al) Private (Ma. Carmen A. Vda de Teves et 43
al) (writ of demolition)

Osmena Ext. corner Gaabucayan Sts. Lapasan Private (Firmacion Development Inc) 5
(Ruben Sacedo et al)

Brgy 12, Montecarlo, Pabayo-Yacapin Sts CDO Writ of Demolition (Heirs of Rodolfo 6
(Yolando Valdon Aneneon et al) Waga)

Zone 6, Agusan Private (Tom Racaza et al) 8

(writ of demolition)

Purok 10, Tablon Private with judgement (Benito Unchua) 21

Purok 12, Tablon Private (Carlos Arce) (writ of demolition) 165

TOTAL 5,457
4. Those not affected by 1,2 & 3 but w/ pending or threats of demolition/eviction

Name of HOA Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of

Families/HHs
Zone 6, Bayabas Private (Jun Liun ) (with agreement to 9
vacate until June 15 at Brgy level)

Zone 6, Diao Subd, Bonbon Private (Gloria Ebarle)(for relocation) 15

Zone 6, Bonbon (Voice of Southern Caretakers Private (Gloria Ebarle) (for relocation) 22
Neighborhood Association VSC)

Zone 5, Bugo (Federation of Zone 5 Bugo Private (Felipa Baal) (for ejectment but 167
Neighborhood Association) no court order)

Zone 8, Bulua Private (Milagros Ortega) 8

(under court litigation)

Zone 2, Upper Bulua Private (for ejectment) (requesting 12

assistance to cancel signed MOA)

PuliCreek, Canitoan (Hampers the Private (Narcissius Tan) (for ejectment- 8

Development of Silver Creek Subdivision) no writ)

Upper Bontong, Camaman-an (Camaman-an Public (for ejectment) 45

Pag-ibig Landless Association)

Bontong, Camaman-an (United Camaman-an Private (Remedio S. Ferrer) (under court 22

Landless Association) litigation)

-7-
Upper Palawan, Camaman-an (Upper Palawan Private (Fe Legaspi) (under court 41
Camaman-an Landless Association) litigation)

Tipolohan, Camaman-an (Scandinavian Farm Private (DACLAG) (for relocation) 23

Village Landless Association)

Tierra del Puerto, Camamanan (Birhen sa Private (Scandinavian Children Mission) 181
Fatima Landless Association) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 6, Carmen (Pag-asa Landless Association) Private (Carmen Ferrer) (for lot 114
acquisition)

Zone 8, Upper Dagong, Carmen Private (Mariano Velez) (for lot 12

acquisition)

Zone 8, Carmen Private (Gomersindo Capinpuyan) (for 11

ejectment)

Villarin St, Carmen (Mt. Carmel Pag-asa Private (Philbank of Commerce) (with 19
Neighborhood Association) notice to vacate)

M. Vega Street, Consolacion Private (Nona Mendoza) (for ejectment – 13

no writ)

Zone 5, Cugman (Zone 5 Binuligay Landless Private (Lucio Caballero) (3M strip access 11
Association) lot to CDORSHIP-2)

Zone 3, Cugman Private (Vilma Vacalares) (for lot 27

acquisition)

Kauswagan (within property of Santa Barbara Private (Heirs of Fausto Dugenio)(motion 14

Subdivision) for execution)

Bongbongon, Kauswagan Private (Communities Phil)(for 8

ejectment)

Zone 6, Kapisnon, Kauswagan Access road to proposed NHA church 22

San Miguel Village, Lapasan Private (Neri, Ruben)(for ejectment) 25

Sta. Cruz, Lapasan Private (Gonzales, Go, Canete, Abella) 22

(with letter request to avail Peso-Peso
Program)

Agora, Lapasan (Urban Poor Landless Private (See Hong) (for ejectment but no 71
Association of Neighborhood in Little Bohol writ)
IPLAN-LB)

Gaabucaya Extension,Agora, Lapasan Private (Charon, Waga, Llamoso, Galo) 6

(for ejectment but no writ)

Zone 3 (Airport) Lumbia Private (Adelfa Sia) (for ejectment) 12

Piaping Puti, Macabalan (Mulmac United (along national highway/ airport) (for 151
Urban Poor Homeowners Association Inc ejectment)
MUUPHAI)

St. Ignatius, Macasandig(Paglaum Landless Inc) Public (for relocation) 22

Crossing Tibasak, Macasandig (Kilusan ng mga Private (Christopher Wabe) (with 30

Masang Mahihirap) compromise agreement to vacate)

2nd Street, Nazareth Private (Hector Gaerlan) (for ejectment 6

but no writ)

9th-22nd Street, Nazareth Private (Protacio Velez) (for ejectment 28

but no writ)

28th Street, Nazareth Private (Lopez Vizcaya Mngt) (request 14

for relocation)

-8-
Sitio Kawayan, Patag (Sitio Kawayan Private (Evelyn Mendiola) 10
Neighborhood Association) (request for relocation)

Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4319-A (1st Batch) Private (Alicia Linan) (for lot acquisition) 22
nd
Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4319-A (2 Batch) Public (Military Reservation) 61
(for ejectment)

Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4318-B Public (Military Reservation) (for 48

ejectment)
nd
Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4319-B (2 Batch) Public (Military Reservation) 124
(for ejectment)

Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4353 Public (Military Reservation) 35

(for ejectment)

Camp Evangelista, Patag Lot 4319-B Public (Military Reservation) 80

(for ejectment)

Sitio Wak-wak, Patag (Zone 2 Lower Patag Public (Military Reservation) 72

Occupants Assn) (for ejectment)

San Juan, Seaside, Puntod (PPA Claimant Private (Heirs of Ruperto Gaabucayan) 305
Areas)

Abellanosa St. Brgy 17 (Abellanosa Setters Private (PPA) (for ejectment) 48

Assn)

Abellanosa St. Brgy 18 (Buhay Smallville Private (Jacinto Tan/ LAYCHO) 16

Landless Assn Inc)

V. Roa – Luna St. Brgy 27 (Oro Christian Private (Dorothy Buhay) 88

Residents Landless Assn.) (for lot acquisition)

V. Roa St. Brgy 28 Private (Alfonso Goking) 49

(for lot acquisition)

Brgy 29 Private (Malferrari) (with letter request 15

to the City Mayor for relocation)

Sto Nino Church Brgy 31 Private (with letter request for lot 15
acquisition)

Sto Nino, Brgy 31 Private (Chavez) (owner will provide) 50

Brgy 31 (New Brgy Hall) Private (Andrew Go) 9

(request for relocation)

Sto Nino Brgy 31 Private (Joaquin Misa) 69

(for ejectment but no writ)

J. Ramonal St Private (Chavez-Abaya) 129

(for ejectment but no writ)

V. Roa St. Brgy 32 Private (Manuel Ramonal) 15

(for relocation)

LKKS Drive, Brgy 35 (Brgy 35 Residents Assn Private (for relocation) 342
Inc)
Yacapin Ext Brgy 36 Private (La Vina) (for demolition but no 26
writ)

Hayes Ext Brgy 36 Private (Archdiocese of CDO) (for 19

demolition but no writ)

Cemetery Area Brgy 40 Private (Serina) (for lot acquisition) 68

LKK Drive, Brgy 34 Public (For ejectment but no writ) 22

Zone 9, Patag Private (Isolaman Industries) (for 16

-9-
 demolition)

Hayes St Brgy 36 Private (Federico del Puerto) (judgement 58

unlawful detainer of damages)

Zone 1B, Iponan Private (Serina) (task force demolition) 17

Zone 2, Kauswagan Private (De Oro Realty) (for demolition) 10

Pagatpat Private (Emerlyn Cabatana) (for 13

demolition)

Zone 5, Bugo Private (Roa Estate) (proposed 12

relocation)

M. Vega St Consolacion Private (Mr. Ello) (existing road) 2

Licoan Brgy 25 Private (Ma. Nena Caberte) 55

Upper Kolambog, Lapasan (Upper Kolambog Private (Task Group Demolition) 19

Lapasan Landless Assn UKLLAI)

Yacapin Ext Brgy 36 Public (One peso lot additional) 7

Burgos St Brgy 17 Private (Marcelino Garcia) 18

(for lot acquisition)

Zone 4 Upper Bulua Private (Joaquin Ello) (for ejectment but 54

no writ)

Airport Lumbia (CAAP) Private (Cemetery of Philippine 243

Independent Church) (for lot acquisition)
TOTAL 3,452
5. Those not affected by 1,2,3 & 4 and whose land owners are willing to sell property to occupants

Name of HOA Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of

Families/HHs
Purok Manggahan, Balulang (Purok Manggahan Private (Carcosa) (Piso-Piso Program) 53
Landless Assn) (for lot acquisition)

Upper Balulang (Pioneer Homeowners Private (Emmanuel Saco) (for lot 122
Neighborhood Assn) acquisition)

Villa Verde, Balulang (Tierra Villa Verde Private (Boyboy Roa) (for lot acquisition) 216
Neighborhood Assn)

Zone 6, Bayabas (Gmelina Drive Landless Private (Ananah Bank) 33

Neighborhood Assn) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 1, Buara, Bayabas (Kapunungan Private (for lot acquisition) 38

Sampaguita Inc)

Kiraba, Bayabas (Kiraba Neighborhood Private (Ang, Chisin, Lagsa, Secured 73

Seashore Settlers Assn) Savings, Arado) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 1, Bayabas (Rayville Comp. Assn) Private (Renato Pruto) (CMP 10% equity) 58

Zone 1, Bayabas (Mindanilla Neighborhood Private (FILCAN Inc) (owner has offer to 65
Assn) sell)

Zone 8, Bonbon (Bonbon United Neighborhood Private (Bolo & Lestoro) (for CMP 30%) 76
Assn BUNA)

Zone 3, Bugo (Zone 3 Bugo Riverside Private (Ananah Bank) (for lot 113
Homeowners Assn) acquisition)

Zone 10, Bulua (Lot 4314 Landless Assn) Private (Alvarez) (for lot acquisition) 101

Zone 2, Lower Bulua Private (Central Bank foreclosed) (for lot 24

acquisition)

- 10 -
Zone 8, Bulua (Sapong Neighborhood Private (Edelmera Santos) (for lot 15
Homeowners Assn) acquisition)

Imburnal Palawan, Camaman-an (Imburnal Private (for CMP) (Banco Pilipino Savings 80
Palawan Assn IMPALA) Bank)

Tierra del Puerto, Camaman-an (Mahayag CMP (10%) (Maybank) 64

Neighborhood Assn)

V Castro, Carmen (V. Castro Landless Assn) Private (Virginia Gothong and Leoncio 18
Tong) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 1, Carmen (Friendly Neighborhood Private (Jesus Yamut and PVB) 26

Landless Assn FNLA) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 9, Carmen (Kahugpungan sa Private (Saragga/Bautista) 26

Nagkahiusang Kabus nga Managsilingan KNKM) (for lot acquisition)

V Castro (USA) (United Settlers Assn) Private (Yamut) (for lot acquisition) 107

Dabatian Ext Carmen (Integrated Private (National Devt Corp) (for lot 12
Neighborhood Landless Assn INLA) acquisition)

Zone 9, Macanhan, Carmen (Amilanang Public (Piso-piso Program) (lot 379

Mindanao Farmers Neighborhood Assn) acquisition)

Dabatian Ext Carmen (Dabatian Neighborhood Private (Natl Devt Corp) (for lot 25
Homeowners) acquisition)

Sta Cruz Zone 3 Carmen (Sta Cruz Homeowners Private (Bienvenido Cruz) (asking govt 23
Assn Inc) help for area devt)

Zone 9, Macanhan, Carmen (Quirino Public (Piso-piso Program) (for lot 49

Homeowners Assn) acquisition)

Zone 2, Cugman (Cugman Urban Poor Landless Private (Angel Chavez) (Owner will 49
Assn CUPLA) provide relocation)

Zone 5, Cugman (Zone 5 Land Occupancy and Private (Ramon Kho) (for lot 65
Homeowners Assn) acquisition/CMP)

Zone 6, Upper Cugman (Upper Cugman Private (Tamparong) (for CMP) 7

Neighborhood Assn)

Purok 3, Gusa (Gusa Small Valley Landless Private (PNB) (for lot acquisition) 39
Assn)

Pasil, Kauswagan (Basak Drive Assn) Private (DBP foreclosed) (for lot 34
acquisition)

Zone 6, Kauswagan Private (Land Bank of the Phil) (for 13

relocation)

Zone 4, Kauswagan (San Rafael Village Private (requesting city govt for area 46
Homeowners Assn.) devt)

Zone 6, Capisnon Kauswagan (Neighborhood Private (Valentina Lomongo) (for lot 39

Assn) acquisition)

Centro Kolambog, Lapasan (Medalla Milagrosa Private (Bank of Gitagum) (for CMP 10%) 18
Homeowners Assn)

Centro Kolambog, Lapasan (Bajas Comp. Private (Constancio Bajas) (applying for 40
Landless Neighborhood Assn) CMP)

KM 5, Lumbia (Acacia Homeowners Assn) Private (DBP foreclosed) (for lot 9

acquisition)

Purok 4, Puerto (Holy Mary Ext Neighborhood Private (Tax Declaration by Natl) (for lot 76
Assn) acquisition)

- 11 -
 Purok 1, Tablon (Tablon Riverside Urban Public (for lot acquisition) 45
Neighborhood Landless Assn TARUNLA)

Palalan, Tablon (Sitio 8, Purok, Palalan) Public (for lot acquisition) 68

Purok 4, Tablon (Purok 4 Tablon Landless Assn Private (Teresita Sanchez) (for lot 115
Inc) acquisition)

Zone 7, Sapong, Tablon (Zone 7 Sapong Tablon Private (Wealth Bank) (for lot 40
Landless Assn) acquisition)

Purok 4, Tablon (Purok 4 Tablon Homeowners) Private (Teresita Sanchez) (for CMP) 168

Sto. Nino, Brgy 31 (Sto Nino Landless & Private (Antonio Tiu) (for CMP) 62
Homeless Assn)

Western Kolambog, Lapasan (Western Private (PNB) 230

Kolambog Lapasan Neighborhood Assn)

Tignapoloan (for relocation) 53

Zone 4, Bonbon (Bonbon Natl High School) (for relocation) 27

Purok 14, Tablon (Tablon Bukana of CDO Private (Landbank) 170

Neighborhood Assn)
TOTAL 3,209
6. Potential for displacement due to climate change

Potential Cause of Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of

Displacement Families/HHs
Zone 4, Agusan (Silingan Makiangayon Beach Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 191
Organization)

Zone 6, Agusan (Christ the King Poor Assn) Private (Tamparong vs Sabanpan) 104
(for lot acquisition)

Agusan (for lot acquisition) with letter request 9

from Brgy Chair

Carinogan, Balulang (Macanhan Balongis Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 167
Settlers Assn)

Upper Balulang (Zone 1 Upper Balulang Private (for lot acquisition) 36

Neighborhood Landless Assn)

Carinogan, Balulang ((Balulang Greenview Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 32

Village Homeowner)

Carinogan, Balulang Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 221

Carinogan, Balulang (Oro Zone 8 Neighborhood Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition)
Assn Inc OROZENA) 95

Sto Nino Buara, Bayabas (Sto Nino Buara Private (Felisa Tamparong) 293
Bayabas Neighborhood Landless Assn) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 1, Buara, Bayabas (Labiano Comp) Private (Renato Pruto) 22

(for lot acquisition)

Mahayahay, Bayabas (Mahayahay Landless Private (Pepito Alvarez) 80

Settlers Assn) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 3, Bugo (Zone 3 Bugo Petitioners Assn) Private (Casino-lot claimant) 91

(for lot acquisition)

Zone 6, 2 & 4, Bulua (Zone 6 Bulua Landless Private (request for lot acquisition) 37
Assn)

Zone 1, Bulua Public (for lot requisition) 16

- 12 -
Apovel, Bulua (Apovel Bulua Paradise Assn Private (Apovel Subd) 12
ABPA) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 7, Bulua (Bulua Candida Urban Poor (for lot acquisition) 68

Neighborhood Assn)

Zone 1, Bulua (for lot acquisition) 71

Zone 8, Bulua (Pag-uswag Landless Assn) Public with claimant (for lot acquisition) 43

Zone 7,Bulua (Zone 7 Bulua Lot Renters Assn) Private (Mr. Roa) (for lot acquisition) 25

Zone 2, Lower Bulua (Zone 2 Lower Bulua Private (Cecilio Ebarat) (for lot 70
Landless Assn) acquisition)

Zone 8, Bulua (Purok Tugas Landless Assn) Public (for lot acquisition) 81

Zone 2, Lower Bulua (Walang Iwanan Nating Private (Gil Caingin) (for lot acquisition) 29
Samahan Neighborhood Assn WINS)

Zone 2, Lower Bulua (Zone 2 Lower Bulua Private (Porcadilla) 28

Landless Assn)

Zone 8, Bulua (Labita Comp Landless Assn) Private (Labita) (for lot acquisition) 19

Zone 2, Lower Bulua (Beside Cockpit Arena Private (Myrna Bernales) 48

Landless Assn) (for lot acquisition)

Zone 3, Upper Bulua (Zone 3 Upper Bulua Private (Teofisto Guingona) 30

Landless Assn)

Puli, Canitoan (Puli Calaanan Cadastral Assn) Public (for lot acquisition) 37

Purok 2, Dist 4, Canitoan (Zone 4 Landless Private (Taboclaon, Flores, Quimpo) (for 26
Residents ZOFOLAR) lot acquisition)

Purok 2, Canitoan (Hiverguard Neighborhood Private (Amora Eduave) lot claimant 39

Assn)

Puli, Calaanan Public (for lot acquisition) with letter 21

request from the Brgy Chair for
relocation)

Looc, Macalajar (Looc Macalajar Neighborhood Private (Cag. Credit Coop) (for lot 14
Assn) acquisition)

Zone 5, Carmen (Carmen Ferry Neighborhood Private (Velez) (for lot acquisition) 54
Assn Inc)

Zone 10, Lower Carmen (Brgy Carmen Lower Private (Raran) (for lot acquisition) 57
Zone 10 Landless Assn Inc)

Gumamela Ext Carmen (Gumamela Ext Carmen Private (PCIB foreclosed) (for lot 33
CDO United Poor Assn) acquisition)

Moco, Carmen (Moco Carmen Neighborhood Private (Mr. Raran) (for lot acquisition) 11
Assn Inc)

Macanhan, Carmen (United Macanhan Tribal Private (PNB, Metrobank, Obenga) 48

Landless Assn. Inc)

Zone 3, Carmen (Carmen Progressive Housing Private ((Central Bank) (for lot 69
Neighborhood Assn CAPROHNA Inc) acquisition)

Zone 10, Carmen (Zayas Hillside Neighborhood Private (Nicolas Cuenca) 22

Assn ZAHNA)

Dist 2, Consolacion (Consolacion Malaumon Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 119
Homeowners Assn COMAHOA)

- 13 -
Dist 4, Consolacion (Consolacion Neighborhood Private (for lot acquisition0 98
Landless Assn)

Zone 8, Cugman Urban Poor Assn ZOCUSUPA Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 50

Zone 6, Cugman Neighbor, hood Assn Inc Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 311
ZOCUNA

Zone 8, Cugman (Zone 8 Cugman Landless Assn Private (Tamparong) (for lot requisition) 111
ZOCULA)

Zone 8, Cugman (Bigaan Neighborhood Assn Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 253
Inc BNAI)

Zone 3, Cugman (Zone 3 Cugman Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 54

Neighborhood Assn)

Purok 2A, Gusa (Purok 2A Gusa Landless Assn) Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 173

Purok 4A, Gusa (Purok 4A Gusa Hillside United Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 173
Neighborhood GHUNAI)

Purok 2B, Gusa (Gusa Landless Residents Assn Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 144
Inc GLRAI)

Zone 3, Purok 2B, Gusa (Zone 3, Purok 2B Gusa Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 275
CDO Landless Organization, Inc)

Purok 5, Gusa (Purok 5 Gusa Landless Private (Tamparong (for lot acquisition) 219
Homeowners Assn)

Purok 3, Gusa (Gusa Upper San Miguel Private (Veronica Tamparong) (for lot 52
Landless Assn) acquisition)

Purok 1, Gusa (Gusa Sunshine Landless Assn) Private (Felisa Tamparong) (for lot 78
acquisition

Purok 3A, Gusa (Basak Landless Livelihood Assn Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 421
Inc)

Purok 3B, Gusa (Purok 3B Urban Poor Landless Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 116
Assn)

Purok 7, Gusa (Purok 7 Urban Poor Landless Private (Felisa Tamparong) 67

Assn)

Purok 3A, Gusa (requesting lot acquisition) 40

Purok 2B, Gusa (Gusa Residents Assn) Nicolas Cuenca 195

Purok 8A, Gusa Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 73

Purok 2A, Gusa Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 183

Indahag (Indahag Neighborhood Assn Inc) Public (for lot acquisition) 43

Capisnon, Kauswagan (Beja Comp Assn) Private (Jovita Beja) (request for 32
relocation)

Zone 2, Kauswagan (Cadastral Neighborhood Public & Private (Ranon Abejuela) 57

Assn Inc CNAI)

San Juan, Lapasan (Lapasan Urban Poor Assn Public (for lot acquisition) 432
LUPA)

San Roque, Lapasan (San Roque Livelihood Private (Montenegro, 37

Urban Poor) Lee, Dalmar, Wabe)

Camp Alagar, Sector 1, Lapasan (Camp Alagar (for lot acquisition) 58

Sector 1 Landless Assn)

- 14 -
 Talisay, Lapasan (Talisay Landless Assn) Private (Neri Comp) (for lot acquisition) 42

Kolambog, Lapasan (Kolambog Land Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 258
Acquisition Organization KLAO)

Western Kolambog, Lapasan (Western Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 89

Kolambog Landless Assn Inc)

Western Kolambog, Lapasan (Paghiusa Urban Private (Tamparong) 43

Poor Assn Inc)

La Paz Neighborhood Lapasan (Lapaz Private (Goking) (for lot acquisition) 88

Neighborhood Assn)

Zone 6, Lapasan (Lapasan Westside B’hood Private (Tamparong) (for lot acquisition) 217
Assn)

Sitio Mabuhay, Lumbia (for lot acquisition) 27

Private (Goking)

Cabula, Lumbia (Cabula Landless Assn Inc) (for lot acquisition) 39

Lower Dulawon, Lumbia (Lumbia Dulawon Private (Gaabucayan/Ramon Averastore) 52

Resident Assn)

Lumbia (Lumbia Landless Neighborhood Assn) Private (Provincial Office Mis Or) (for lot 45
acquisition)

Amor 3, Macabalan AMOR 3 Public (for lot acquisition) 24

Aluba, Macasandig Private (Dra Emano) (for lot acquisition) 65

Mandumol, Macasandig (Magtabayayong Private (Gerino Agbaloy) (for lot 41

Mandumol Landless Assn Inc) acquisition)

Zone 5 Balite, Puerto Public (Mr. Gabaton) lot claimant 6

San Juan Mauswagon, Puntod (Mauswagon Private (Maato, Liloc, PV Com, Paras) (for 192
Homeowners Assn) lot acquisition)

B-4, Puntod (B-4 Puntod Residents Public (NHA) (for lot acquisition) 126
Organization)

Purok 5, Tablon (Tablon Developers Assn) Public (for lot acquisition) 17

Purok 13, Tablon (V-Watch Comp) Private (Land Bank foreclosed area) 50
(requesting lot acquisition)

Purok 6, Tablon (Migkana Landless Assn) Public(for lot acquisition) 115

J Rivera St. Brgy 27 (Corrales United Landless Private (Heirs of Mr. Ebarle) (request for 85
Residents Neighborhood) relocation)

La Paz 1, Seaside, Lapasan Public (request for relocation) 13

Lower Dulawon, Lumbia 28

Patpat, Lumbia
80
TOTAL 7,955
7. Others (pls. specify)
Particulars Location Land Owner of occupied lot No. of
Families/HHs

- 15 -
 REMAINING SENDONG VICTIMS NOT YET PROVIDED HOUSE AND LOT AS OF DEC. 31, 2013
TOTALLY DAMAGED PARTIALLY DAMAGED FLOODED TOTAL
NO. BARANGAY OWNER RENTER RFO/ TOTAL OWNER RENTER RFO/ TOTAL OWNER RENTER RFO/ TOTAL NO. OF
SHARER SHARER SHARER AFFECTED
1 AGUSAN 41 3 44 28 28 7 7 79
2 BAIKINGON 5 5 15 15 1 1 21
3 BALULANG 158 17 175 441 20 21 482 1407 53 18 1478 2135
4 BAYANGA 2 1 3 0 2 1 3 6
5 BAYABAS 0 1 1 0 1
6 BONBON 1 1 9 9 1981 1981 1991
7 BRGY 6 10 10 5 5 8 8 23
8 BRGY 7 5 5 7 2 9 60 7 67 81
9 BRGY 10 1 1 42 7 37 86 110 20 13 143 230
10 BRGY 13 56 4 2 62 58 5 9 72 66 17 6 89 223
11 BRGY 15 11 11 12 3 15 285 3 288 314
12 BRGY 16 0 0 1 1 1
13 BRGY 17 2 1 3 12 1 13 67 4 2 73 89
14 BRGY 18 29 14 14 57 8 1 9 192 59 35 286 352
15 BRGY 21 0 4 4 17 17 21
16 BRGY 22 0 0 1 1 2 2
17 BRGY 23 2 2 1 1 61 7 12 80 83
18 BRGY 25 2 2 9 9 3 3 14
19 BRGY 26 0 0 1 1 1
20 BULUA 40 40 257 257 930 1 2 933 1230
21 CAMAMAN-AN 0 3 3 2 2 5
22 CANITOAN 2 2 5 5 103 103 110
23 CARMEN 145 13 1 159 403 22 9 434 1210 52 7 1269 1862
24 CONSOLACION 147 7 3 157 590 55 6 651 518 51 23 592 1400
25 CUGMAN 33 33 157 2 159 644 24 6 674 866

- 16 -
26 DANSOLIHON 10 10 2 2 3 3 15
27 GUSA 22 22 78 78 242 242 342
28 INDAHAG 8 8 8 8 5 5 21
29 IPONAN 78 1 79 323 1 324 612 2 614 1017
30 KAUSWAGAN 35 35 183 1 2 186 826 5 6 837 1058
31 LUMBIA 0 9 9 10 10 19
32 MACABALAN 2 2 9 1 10 20 1 21 33
33 MACASANDIG 282 5 287 286 14 2 302 345 7 352 941
34 MAMBUAYA 1 1 1 1 0 2
35 NAZARETH 3 1 4 13 7 1 21 21 4 1 26 51
36 PAGALUNGAN 0 0 12 12 12
37 PAGATPAT 26 26 92 92 377 1 378 496
38 PIGSAG-AN 38 38 2 2 4 4 44
39 PUNTOD 1 1 15 1 16 335 2 2 339 356
40 SAN SIMON 5 5 36 36 0 41
41 TABLON 24 1 25 65 1 66 44 44 135
42 TINAPOLOAN 0 2 2 6 6 8
43 TUBURAN 27 27 4 4 5 5 36
44 TUMPAGON 44 44 1 1 1 1 46
TOTAL 1298 67 21 1386 3195 140 92 3427 10545 318 137 11000 15813

- 17 -
 ANNEX 2
Worksheets on Housing Needs Calculation

LSP Worksheet No. 2.1

BASIC DATA AND ASSUMPTIONS
Population in 2010 (HH population) 598,803 Households/Dwelling Unit 1.03082
Annual Population Growth (NSO 2.69% Displaced Units 34,898
2000 & 2010 census)
Household Size 4.4 Homeless 0
Housing Stock (2013) 142,966 Households (2013) 147,372

NEW HOUSING UNITS NEEDED

New units needed due to BACKLOG

Total Annual Program Period

Doubled-up (3.082 % of HS) 4,406 489
Homeless 0 2014-2022
Displaced 34,898 3,878
TOTAL

LSP Worksheet No. 2.2

POPULATION PROJECTION
Base 1st Planning 2nd Planning 3rdPlanning
Year Period Period Period

2013 2014 2016 2019 2022

Population 648,438 665,881 702,187 760,392 823,421

Households 147,372 151,337 159,588 172,816 187,141

Average HH
4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4
size (4.355)
Housing stock 142,966

New units needed due to FUTURE NEED (population growth)

TOTAL ANNUAL
I. Planning Period (2014-2016) 12,216 4,072
II. Planning Period (2017-2019) 13,228 4,409
III. Planning Period (2020-2022) 14,325 4,775
TOTAL 39,769

- 18 -
 LSP Worksheet No. 2.3

Total new units needed annually due to backlog and population

growth

Total for
Doubled- Population Annual the
Year Displaced Homeless
up Increase Total planning
period
2014 489 3,877 0 4,072 8,438
2015 489 3,877 0 4,072 8,438 25,314
2016 489 3,877 0 4,072 8,438
2017 489 3,877 0 4,409 8,775
2018 490 3,878 0 4,409 8,777 26,329
2019 490 3,878 0 4,409 8,777
2020 490 3,878 0 4,775 9,143
2021 490 3,878 0 4,775 9,143 27,430
2022 490 3,878 0 4,776 9,144

TOTAL 4,406 34,898 39,769 79,073 79,073

Summary of new units needed (due to backlog and population

growth)
PLANNING PERIOD HOUSING UNITS NEEDED
Due to Due to Total %
Backlog Population
Growth
(1st)2014-2016 3 years 13,098 12,216 25,314 32.01

(2nd)2017-2019 3 years 13,102 13,227 26,329 33.30

(3rd)2020-2022 3 years 13,104 14,326 27,430 34.69

TOTAL 39,304 39,769 79,073 100.00

- 19 -
- 20 -
- 21 -
- 22 -
- 23 -
- 24 -
 ANNEX 4
TABLE OF ANNUITY FACTOR

ANNUITY FACTOR

Present value interest factor of an (ordinary) annuity of P1 per period at i% for n periods

Period 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 10% 11% 12% 13% 14%

1 0.990 0.980 0.971 0.962 0.952 0.943 0.935 0.926 0.917 0.909 0.901 0.893 0.885 0.877
2 1.970 1.942 1.913 1.886 1.859 1.833 1.808 1.783 1.759 1.736 1.713 1.690 1.668 1.647
3 2.941 2.884 2.829 2.775 2.723 2.673 2.624 2.577 2.531 2.487 2.444 2.402 2.361 2.322
4 3.902 3.808 3.717 3.630 3.546 3.465 3.387 3.312 3.240 3.170 3.102 3.037 2.974 2.914
5 4.853 4.713 4.580 4.452 4.329 4.212 4.100 3.993 3.890 3.791 3.696 3.605 3.517 3.433
6 5.795 5.601 5.417 5.242 5.076 4.917 4.767 4.623 4.486 4.355 4.231 4.111 3.998 3.889
7 6.728 6.472 6.230 6.002 5.786 5.582 5.389 5.206 5.033 4.868 4.712 4.564 4.423 4.288
8 7.652 7.325 7.020 6.733 6.463 6.210 5.971 5.747 5.535 5.335 5.146 4.968 4.799 4.639
9 8.566 8.162 7.786 7.435 7.108 6.802 6.515 6.247 5.995 5.759 5.537 5.328 5.132 4.946
10 9.471 8.983 8.530 8.111 7.722 7.360 7.024 6.710 6.418 6.145 5.889 5.650 5.426 5.216
15 13.865 12.849 11.938 11.118 10.380 9.712 9.108 8.559 8.061 7.606 7.191 6.811 6.462 6.142
16 14.718 13.578 12.561 11.652 10.838 10.106 9.447 8.851 8.313 7.824 7.379 6.974 6.604 6.265
17 15.562 14.292 13.166 12.166 11.274 10.477 9.763 9.122 8.544 8.022 7.549 7.120 6.729 6.373
18 16.398 14.992 13.754 12.659 11.690 10.828 10.059 9.372 8.756 8.201 7.702 7.250 6.840 6.467
19 17.226 15.678 14.324 13.134 12.085 11.158 10.336 9.604 8.950 8.365 7.839 7.366 6.938 6.550
20 18.046 16.351 14.877 13.590 12.462 11.470 10.594 9.818 9.129 8.514 7.963 7.469 7.025 6.623
25 22.023 19.523 17.413 15.622 14.094 12.783 11.654 10.675 9.823 9.077 8.422 7.843 7.330 6.873
30 25.808 22.396 19.600 17.292 15.372 13.765 12.409 11.258 10.274 9.427 8.694 8.055 7.496 7.003

- 25 -
 ANNEX 5

THE TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP IN ACTION

- 26 -
- 27 -
- 28 -
- 29 -
Information System and Data Banking Section
EMD-CPDO

(Socio-Economic Survey at Barangay Pagatpat)

- 30 -
 ANNEX 6

DIFFERENT RELOCATION SITES OF THE CITY

Pagatpat Relocation Site

GK-Shell Phase 2A Relocation

- 31 -
Calaanan Relocation Site

(Mahogany)

(Phase 3)

- 32 -
GK-SM BDO Relocation

- 33 -
Balubal Relocation Site

- 34 -
Mother of Divine Mercy Village
(Opol Relocation Site)

Indahag Relocation Site

- 35 -
 GLOSSARY

Adaptation

Adaptation is the adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual or expected

climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities.

Affordability

The potential amount of income that could be made available for housing investment after
excluding basic necessities such as food, clothing, education, medical expenses, transportation,
income tax and recurrent costs of housing (electricity, water, garbage disposal).

Backlog

Backlog is the number of dwelling units needed at the beginning of the planning period due to
doubled-up HHs, displaced units and homeless HHs/individuals

Displaced units (relocation need)

Units located a) in danger areas such as esteros, railroad tracks, garbage dumps, river banks and
flood prone areas or households/individuals living in public places such as sidewalks, roads,
parks, play grounds, b) in areas where government infrastructure projects are to be
implemented, and c) in areas where there is a court order for eviction and demolition.

Base Year

Base year is the year before the first planning period or the last census year

Capacity

Capacity is combination of all strengths and resources available within a community, society or
organization that can reduce the level of risk, or effects of a disaster. Capacity may include
infrastructure and physical means, institutions, societal coping abilities, as well as human
knowledge, skills and collective attributes such as social relationships, leadership and
management. Capacity may also be described as capability.

Climate Change

Climate Change is a change in climate that can be identified by changes in the mean and/or
variability of its properties and that persists for an extended period typically decades or longer,
whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activity.
Disaster

Disaster is a serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society involving

widespread human, material, economic or environmental losses and impacts, which exceeds the
ability of the affected community or society to cope using its own resources. Disasters are often
described as a result of the combination of: the exposure to a hazard; the conditions of
vulnerability that are present; and insufficient capacity or measures to reduce or cope with the
potential negative consequences. Disaster impacts may include loss of life, injury, disease and
their negative effects on human, physical, mental and social well-being, together with damage to
property, destruction of assets, loss of services, social and economic disruption and
environmental degradation.

Disaster Mitigation

Disaster Mitigation is the lessening or limitation of the adverse impacts of hazards and related
disasters. Mitigation measures encompass engineering techniques and hazard-resistant
construction as well as improved environmental policies and public awareness.

Disaster Prevention

Disaster Prevention is the outright avoidance of adverse impacts of hazards and related
disasters. It expresses the concept and intention to completely avoid potential adverse impacts
through action taken in advance such as construction of dams or embankments that eliminate
flood risks, land-use regulations that do not permit any settlement in high-risk zones, and
seismic engineering designs that ensure the survival and function of a critical building in any
likely earthquake.

Disaster Risk Reduction

Disaster Risk Reduction is the concept and practice of reducing disaster risks through systematic
efforts to analyze and manage the causal factors of disasters, including through reduced
exposures to hazards, lessened vulnerability of people and property, wise management of land
and the environment, and improved preparedness for adverse events.

Doubled-up households

Also known as double occupancy and exists when one dwelling unit is shared by two or more
households

Exposure

Exposure is the degree to which the elements at risk are likely to experience hazard events of
different magnitudes.

Hazard

Hazard is a dangerous phenomenon, substance, human activity or condition that may cause loss
of life, injury or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihood and services, social
and economic disruption, or environmental damage.
Future Need

Future need refers to the number of new dwelling units needed to supply the demand of new
household formed due to population increase.

Homeless

Homeless are the individuals or households living in parks, along sidewalks, and all those
without any form of shelter

Household

A household as defined by NSO is a social unit consisting of a person or a group of person who
sleep in the same dwelling unit and have common arrangement for the preparation and
consumption of food.

Housing Stock

Housing stock is the number of occupied dwelling units at the beginning of the 1st planning
period. It can be computed as the number of households during the beginning of the first
planning period minus the number of homeless households and/or individuals, and divide the
difference by the number of households per dwelling unit.

Local Shelter Plan

A local shelter plan is a document which includes an analysis of the present local housing
situation, i.e., the identification of housing problems, upgrading and future housing needs,
household’s affordability and local resources such as land, provision of basic services and
finance. After analysis and comparison of the available resources and needs, the LGU formulates
the main shelter strategies. An implementation plan will complete the local shelter plan.

Planning Period

Planning period covers the duration that will be needed to realize the housing vision of the LGU.

Program Period

Program period is the time frame set by the LGU to meet the target housing needs due to
backlog, population growth and upgrading needs.

Resilience

Resilience is the ability of a system, community or society exposed to hazards to resist, absorb,
accommodate and recover from the effects of a hazard in a timely and efficient manner,
including through the preservation and restoration of its essential basic structures and functions.

Shelter needs

Shelter needs are 1.) the new housing units needed (lot, basic services and dwelling unit) and 2.)
the upgrading needs (either land tenure, some of basic services, or structural improvement of
unit or combinations of these).
Shelter strategy

A shelter strategy is a plan of action which defines the objectives for the development of shelter
conditions; identifies the resources available to meet the objectives and the means by which
they can be used most cost-effectively. It also sets out the responsibilities and time frame for
implanting the various measures.

Upgrading Need

Upgrading need is defined as the need for improving land tenure status, e.g., provision of
minimum security of tenure as in a written contract to possessing a title to the land; access to
basic services, e.g., macadam road to paved road; and house condition, e.g., from a semi-
permanent structure to a permanent one.

Vulnerability

Vulnerability is the characteristics and circumstances of a community, system or asset that make
it susceptible to the damaging effects of a hazard. Vulnerability may arise from various physical,
social, economic, and environmental factors such as poor design and construction of buildings,
inadequate protection of assets, lack of public information and awareness, limited official
recognition of risks and preparedness measures, and disregard for wise environmental
management.
 REFERENCES

· Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Cagayan de Oro City

· Census of Population & Housing, NSO, 2007
· Census of Population & Housing, NSO, 2010
· Family Income & Expenditure Survey, NSO 2009
· National Households Targeting System, DSWD, 2009
· Small Area Poverty Estimates, NSCB, 2009
· Percentage Distribution of Total Family Expenditure by Major Expenditure Group,
NSCB 2009
· Revised IRR, Batas Pambansa Bldg. 220
· Republic Act 7279 (Urban Development & Housing Act of 1992)