Piab 003
Piab 003
Piab 003
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Background. Third-generation cephalosporin-resistant urinary tract infections (UTIs) often have limited oral antibiotic op-
tions with some children receiving prolonged parenteral courses. Our objectives were to determine predictors of long parenteral
therapy and the association between parenteral therapy duration and UTI relapse in children with third-generation cephalosporin-
resistant UTIs.
Methods. We conducted a multisite retrospective cohort study of children <18 years presenting to acute care at 5 children’s
hospitals and a large managed care organization from 2012 to 2017 with a third-generation cephalosporin-resistant UTI from
Escherichia coli or Klebsiella spp. Long parenteral therapy was ≥3 days and short/no parenteral therapy was 0–2 days of concordant
parenteral antibiotics. Discordant therapy was antibiotics to which the pathogen was non-susceptible. Relapse was a UTI from the
same organism within 30 days.
Results. Of the 482 children included, 81% were female and the median age was 3.3 years (interquartile range: 0.8-8). Fifty-
four children (11.2%) received long parenteral therapy (median duration: 7 days). Predictors of long parenteral therapy included
age <2 months (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 67.3; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 16.4-275.7), limited oral antibiotic options (aOR 5.9;
95% CI: 2.8-12.3), and genitourinary abnormalities (aOR 5.4; 95% CI: 1.8-15.9). UTI relapse occurred in 1 of the 54 (1.9%) children
treated with long parenteral therapy and in 6 of the 428 (1.5%) children treated with short/no parenteral therapy (P = .57). Of the 105
children treated exclusively with discordant antibiotics, 3 (2.9%, 95% CI: 0.6%-8.1%) experienced UTI relapse.
Conclusions. Long parenteral therapy was associated with age <2 months, limited oral antibiotic options, and genitourinary ab-
normalities. UTI relapse was rare and not associated with duration of parenteral therapy. For UTIs with limited oral options, further
research is needed on the effectiveness of continued discordant therapy.
Key words. children; treatment; urinary tract infection.
Urinary tract infections (UTIs), one of the most common are caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-
bacterial infections in children [1], have shown increasing producing organisms [3]. Children hospitalized with ESBL
antimicrobial resistance over the last 2 decades [2, 3]. An esti- UTIs have significantly longer lengths of stay than children
mated 5% of pediatric community-acquired UTIs worldwide with non-ESBL UTIs, resulting in patient/family stress, in-
creased costs, and potential for iatrogenic harm [3–5]. The
increased length of stay has been attributed to the transition
that occurs from empiric discordant therapy (in vitro non-
Received 9 May 2020; editorial decision 28 December 2020; accepted 6 January 2021;
Published online February 17, 2021. susceptibility of the pathogen to the antibiotic) to definitive
a
Present Affiliation: UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA. concordant therapy and prolonged parenteral courses due to
b
Present Affiliation: Stanford University School of Medicine and Lucile Packard Children’s
Hospital Stanford, Stanford, CA, USA.
limited oral antibiotic options [3, 4].
Corresponding Author: Marie E. Wang, MD, MPH, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) UTI guide-
Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive MC 5776, Stanford, CA, USA. E-mail:
lines state that most children can be treated orally but do not
marie.wang@stanford.edu.
Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society 2021;10(5):650–8
offer specific recommendations for resistant organisms [6].
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Journal of the Given that these infections have fewer oral antibiotic options,
Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail:
journals.permissions@oup.com.
more data are needed regarding their optimal management.
DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piab003 Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is often used as
UTI Relapse Within the short/no parenteral therapy group, UTI relapse oc-
UTI relapse occurred in 7 of the 482 children (1.5%, 95% CI: curred in 3 of the 302 children (1.0%, 95% CI: 0.2%-2.9%) treated
0.6%-3.0%). In the long parenteral therapy group, UTI relapse with concordant therapy and 3 of the 105 children (2.9%, 95% CI:
occurred in 1 of the 54 (1.9%, 95% CI: 0.1%-9.9%) children com- 0.6%–8.1%) treated with discordant therapy. The absolute risk dif-
pared with 6 of the 428 (1.4%, 95% CI: 0.5%-3.0%) children in the ference between the discordant and concordant therapy groups
short/no parenteral therapy group, for an absolute risk difference was 1.8% (95% CI: −1.5% to 5.1%). Subgroup analyses by suscep-
of −0.4% (95% CI: −4.2% to 3.3%; Table 4). tibility to ceftriaxone are presented in Supplementary Table 5.
Table 3. Definitive Antibiotic Treatment, by Age Group, in Children With Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant UTIs
All Children (n = 482) N, %a Less Than 2 months (n = 28) N, % 2-23 Months (n = 158) N, % 2-4 Years (n = 101) N, % 5-17 Years (n = 195) N, %
Long parenteral therapy (n, %) 54 (11.2)a 21 (75.0) 22 (13.9) 6 (5.9) 5 (2.6)
Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitorb 7 (1.5) 5 (17.9) 1 (0.6) 0 (0) 1 (0.5)
Carbapenemc 39 (8.1) 10 (35.7) 19 (12.0) 6 (5.9) 4 (2.1)
Cephalosporind 4 (0.8) 2 (7.1) 2 (1.3) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Gentamicine 4 (0.8) 4 (14.3) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Short/no parenteral therapy (n, %) 428 (88.8) 7 (25.0) 136 (86.1) 95 (94.1) 190 (97.4)
Amoxicillin-clavulanate 60 (12.4) 5 (17.9) 28 (17.7) 12 (11.9) 15 (7.7)
Cephalosporinf 85 (17.6) 0 (0) 30 (19.0) 21 (20.8) 34 (17.4)
Ciprofloxacin 30 (6.2) 0 (0) 7 (4.4) 4 (4.0) 19 (9.7)
Nitrofurantoin 89 (18.5) 2 (7.1) 20 (12.7) 23 (22.8) 44 (22.6)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 136 (28.2) 0 (0) 40 (25.3) 30 (29.7) 66 (33.8)
Otherg 7 (1.5) 0 (0) 2 (1.3) 2 (2.0) 3 (1.5)
Unknownh 6 (1.2) 0 (0) 3 (1.9) 0 (0) 3 (1.5)
Nonei 15 (3.1) 0 (0) 6 (3.8) 3 (3.0) 6 (3.1)
# UTI Relapses/Total % With UTI Relapse (95% CI) P-value Risk Difference, % (95% CI)
All patients 7/482 1.5 (0.6-3.0)
Long parenteral therapy 1/54 1.9 (0.1-9.9) .57 −0.4 (−4.2 to 3.3)
Short/no parenteral therapy 6/428 1.5 (0.5-3.0)
(b) UTI Relapse Case Details
Case Age/Sex Definitive Therapy Genitourinary Abnormalities
1 2 mo M Meropenem Grade 1 hydronephrosis and grade 1-III VUR
2 1yF Cephalexin None
3 4yF Cephalexin None
4 5yF Cefdinir None
5 5yF Nitrofurantoin None
The first line was made bold since it represented the numbers for the entire study population.
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. UTI, urinary tract infection; VUR, vesicoureteral reflux.
About three-quarters of patients (357/482, 74%) were seen Most of the studies on pediatric third-generation
at institutions with access to records from outside institutions cephalosporin-resistant UTIs describe hospitalized children
or had documentation of a healthcare visit in their EMR within with ESBL UTIs and have documented favorable outcomes on
6 months of the initial UTI. non-carbapenem parenteral therapy [22–24]. However, few
have reported outcomes for those treated with oral therapy.
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Complications Our study used a multisite cohort with tertiary and community
Two of the 16 patients (13% or 4% of the entire long paren- sites and found that 422 of the 482 (87.6%) patients received
teral therapy group) who underwent peripherally inserted only oral therapy. This is a higher percentage than reported by 2
central catheter (PICC) placement experienced PICC com- US-based studies, which demonstrated that 62% of 76 children
plications. One had a PICC line thrombosis and received 4 with ESBL infections (85% from urine) from a single center and
weeks of anticoagulation. One had a PICC line breakage and 57% of 210 children with ESBL infections (89% from urine)
replacement. from 4 children’s hospitals were treated as outpatients [25, 26].
This difference is likely explained by cohort selection, since our
study only included UTIs and excluded children with complex
DISCUSSION
chronic conditions. We also found that UTI relapse occurred in
In this multisite retrospective cohort study of 482 children with only 1.5% of children and the risk of UTI relapse did not differ
third-generation cephalosporin-resistant UTIs, long parenteral by parenteral therapy duration. These results suggest that the
therapy was more common in children <2 months old, those AAP UTI guidelines recommending oral antibiotics can also be
with genitourinary abnormalities, and those whose culture sus- applied to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant UTIs.
ceptibilities conferred limited oral antibiotic options. Among We found that age <2 months was the most significant
children ≥2 months old, only 8% received long parenteral factor associated with long parenteral therapy. This is similar
therapy. UTI relapse was rare and not associated with parenteral to previous studies of pediatric UTI management showing that
therapy duration. These findings suggest that when oral anti- parenteral courses ≥4 days were more common in younger in-
biotic options are available, third-generation cephalosporin- fants, though the percentage of infants <2 months old receiving
resistant UTIs can be treated effectively with oral therapy and ≥4 days of parenteral therapy has decreased from 50% in 2005
should be considered first-line definitive treatment unless to 19% in 2015 [17, 19]. The higher percentage (75%) of infants
children cannot tolerate oral medications. Unexpectedly, a <2 months receiving long parenteral therapy in our study may
substantial proportion (>20%) of our study cohort was treated be explained by limited oral antibiotic options, concerns about
definitively with discordant antibiotics, and few patients ex- side effects of certain oral antibiotics (eg, sulfonamides and
perienced UTI relapse. Therefore, this study also provides in- quinolones), and the overall vulnerability of young infants [27].
formation on current practice patterns, especially when there The association of limited oral antibiotic options with long par-
are limited oral antibiotic options, and provides groundwork enteral therapy is consistent with prior studies demonstrating
for future studies investigating the outcomes of patients treated longer lengths of stay for children with ESBL UTIs when com-
with discordant therapy. pared with children with non-ESBL UTIs [3–5].