Consti Theory Final

Constitution theory
British Constitution
a) Parliamentary government, b) Rule of Law, c) Legislative
Procedure, d) Single Citizenship, e) Cabinet System, f)
Prerogative Writs, g) Parliamentary Privileges, and h)
Bicameralism.
US Constitution
a) Fundamental rights, b) Independence of Judiciary, c) Judicial
Review, d) Impeachment of President, e) Removal of Supreme
Court and High Court Judges and f) Post of Vice-President.
Protection of Life and Personal Liberty Article 21 declares that no person
shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to
procedure established by law.
(1) Right to live with human dignity. (2) Right to decent environment
including pollution free water and air and protection against
hazardous industries. (3) Right to livelihood. (4) Right to privacy. (5)
Right to shelter. (6) Right to health. (7) Right to free legal aid. (8)
Right to speedy trial. (9) Right against handcuffing. (10) Right
against inhuman treatment.(11) Right to travel abroad. (12) Right to
fair trial. (13) Right of prisoner to have necessities of life. (14) Right
of women to be treated with decency and dignity. (15) Right against
public hanging. (16) Right to hearing. (17) Right to information. (18)
Right to sleep
CONFLICT BETWEEN FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS AND DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES
In the Champakam Dorairajan case (1951), the Supreme

Court ruled that in case of any conflict between the
Fundamental Rights and the Directive Principles, the former
would prevail. It declared that the Directive Principles have to
conform to and run as subsidiary to the Fundamental Rights.
But, it also held that the Fundamental Rights could be
amended by the Parliament by enacting constitutional
amendment acts. As a result, the Parliament made the First
Amendment Act (1951)
Golaknath case (1967). In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that
the Parliament cannot take away or abridge any of the
Fundamental Rights, which are ‘sacrosanct’ in nature. In other
words, the Court held that the Fundamental Rights cannot be
amended for the implementation of the Directive Principles.
In the Minerva Mills case (1980), the Supreme Court also held
that ‘the Indian Constitution is founded on the bedrock of the
balance between the Fundamental Rights and the Directive
Principles. They together constitute the core of commitment to
social revolution. They are like two wheels of a chariot, one no less
than the other. To give absolute primacy to one over the other is to
disturb the harmony of the Constitution
the present position is that the Fundamental Rights enjoy supremacy
over the Directive Principles. Yet, this does not mean that the Directive
Principles cannot be implemented. The Parliament can amend the
Fundamental Rights for implementing the Directive Principles, so long
as the amendment does not damage or destroy the basic structure of
the Constitution.
Organization of supreme court
articles 124 to 147 in Part V of the Constitution deal with the organisation,
independence, jurisdiction, powers, procedures and so on of the Supreme Court.
The Parliament is also authorised to regulate them.
Appointment of Judges
The judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president. The chief justice
is appointed by the president after consultation with such judges of the Supreme
Court and high courts as he deems necessary. The other judges are appointed by
president after consultation with the chief justice and such other judges of the
Supreme Court and the high courts as he deems necessary. The consultation with
the chief justice is obligatory in the case of appointment of a judge other than
Chief justice.
Qualifications of Judges
A person to be appointed as a judge of the Supreme Court should
have the following qualifications:
1. He should be a citizen of India.
2. (a) He should have been a judge of a High Court (or high courts in
succession) for five years; or (b) He should have been an advocate of
a High Court (or High Courts in succession) for ten years; or (c) He
should be a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the president
Oath or Affirmation - President, or some person appointed by him
for this purpose.
Tenure of Judges
The Constitution has not fixed the tenure of a judge of the Supreme
Court. However, it makes the following three provisions in this
regard:
1. He holds office until he attains the age of 65 years. Any question
regarding his age is to be determined by such authority and in such
manner as provided by Parliament.
2. He can resign his office by writing to the president.
3. He can be removed from his office by the President on the
recommendation of the Parliament.
Removal of Judges
A judge of the Supreme Court can be removed from his Office by an order
of the president. The President can issue the removal order only after an
address by Parliament has been presented to him in the same session for
such removal. The address must be supported by a special majority of
each House of Parliament (ie, a majority of the total membership of that
House and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that
House present and voting). The grounds of removal are two—proved
misbehaviour or incapacity.
The salaries, allowances, privileges, leave and pension of the judges

of the Supreme Court are determined from time to time by the
Parliament.
Acting Chief Justice 126
The President can appoint a judge of the Supreme Court as an acting
Chief Justice of India when: 1. the office of Chief Justice of India is vacant;
or 2. the Chief Justice of India is temporarily absent; or 3. the Chief
Justice of India is unable to perform the duties of his office.
Ad hoc Judge 127
When there is a lack of quorum of the permanent judges to hold or
continue any session of the Supreme Court, the Chief Justice of India can
appoint a judge of a High Court as an ad hoc judge of the Supreme Court
for a temporary period. He can do so only after consultation with the chief
justice of the High Court concerned and with the previous consent of the
president
Retired Judges
At any time, the chief justice of India can request a retired judge of the
Supreme Court or a retired judge of a high court (who is duly qualified
for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court) to act as a judge of
the Supreme Court for a temporary period. He can do so only with the
previous consent of the president and also of the person to be so
appointed. Such a judge is entitled to such allowances as the
president may determine. He will also enjoy all the jurisdiction, powers
and privileges of a judge of Supreme Court. But, he will not otherwise
be deemed to be a judge of the Supreme Court
Appointment of Judges The judges of a high court are
appointed by the President. The chief justice is appointed by
the President after consultation with the chief justice of India
and the governor of the state concerned. For appointment of
other judges, the chief justice of the concerned high court is
also consulted. In case of a common high court for two or
more states, the governors of all the states concerned are
consulted by the president.
Qualifications of Judges
A person to be appointed as a judge of a high court, should have the
following qualifications:
1.He should be a citizen of India.
2.(a) He should have held a judicial office in the territory of India
for ten years; or (b) He should have been an advocate of a high
court (or high courts in succession) for ten years.
Oath or Affirmation A person appointed as a judge of a high
court, before entering upon his office, has to make and
subscribe an oath or affirmation before the governor of the state
or some person appointed by him for this purpose
Tenure of Judges
The Constitution has not fixed the tenure of a judge of a high court.
However, it makes the following four provisions in this regard:
1. He holds office until he attains the age of 62 years. Any questions
regarding his age is to be decided by the president after consultation with
the chief justice of India and the decision of the president is final.
2. He can resign his office by writing to the president.
3. He can be removed from his office by the President on the
recommendation of the Parliament.
4. He vacates his office when he is appointed as a judge of the Supreme
Court or when he is transferred to another high court.
Salaries and Allowances The salaries
allowances, privileges, leave and pension of the judges of a high court are
determined from time to time by the Parliament. They cannot be varied to
their disadvantage after their appointment except during a financial
emergency.
Transfer of Judges
The President can transfer a judge from one high court to another after
consulting the Chief Justice of India. On transfer, he is entitled to receive
in addition to his salary such compensatory allowance as may be
determined by Parliament.

Consti Theory Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Consti Theory Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Consti Theory Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Constitution theory

In the Champakam Dorairajan case (1951), the Supreme

The salaries, allowances, privileges, leave and pension of the judges

You might also like