Mod Term Report 4
Mod Term Report 4
Mod Term Report 4
Group Number: 08
Maheen Moiz20242-35367
Hafsa Aqeel 20242-
35292
Fahad Bilal 20242-35296
McKinsey 7S Model:
The McKinsey 7S model is a management framework developed by
consulting firm McKinsey & Company. It's used to analyze and improve
organizational effectiveness by examining seven key elements that are crucial
for organizational success. These seven elements are categorized into "hard"
elements and "soft" elements:
1. Strategy: This element refers to the plan devised to maintain and build
competitive advantage over the competition. It encompasses the
organization's objectives, goals, and action plans.
communication channels).
These tools and techniques can be tailored and combined based on the
specific needs, goals, and context of an organization to drive meaningful and
sustainable improvements.
Organizational Development (OD) Intervention Techniques
1. Sensitivity Training
Sensitivity Training, also known as Human Relations Training or T-Group
(Training Group), is a valuable approach used in both personal and
organizational development. It aims to enhance self-awareness,
interpersonal skills, and empathy towards others. By creating a supportive
group setting, sensitivity training facilitates experiential learning and
encourages individuals to explore their thoughts, emotions, and behaviours
within the context of interpersonal dynamics. The main objective of
sensitivity training is to foster personal growth and self-reflection. Through
engaging in group activities and open discussions, participants are
encouraged to examine their own biases, attitudes, and assumptions, while
considering the impact these have on others.
The sensitivity training process involves several essential steps that
contribute to creating a constructive and inclusive learning environment.
While the specific approach may vary, here is a general outline of the
process:
2. Process Consultation
Process Consultation is a valuable approach that focuses on the dynamics
within and between groups. The consultant collaborates with individuals and
groups, assisting them in gaining insights into human and social processes
and effectively addressing related challenges. The primary objective is to
support clients in perceiving, understanding, and taking action regarding the
process events that unfold in their environment.
Process Consultation encompasses specific areas of emphasis, such as
communication, functional roles within groups, problem-solving and decision
-making, group norms, and growth, leadership and authority dynamics, as
well as inter-group cooperation and competition. By addressing these areas,
the consultant facilitates learning, problem-solving, and overall improvement
in how individuals and groups function. The approach emphasizes
empowering clients to develop a deeper understanding of the underlying
processes, enabling them to overcome challenges and enhance their
effectiveness in collaborative efforts.
Process Consultation encompasses a series of key steps to facilitate
effective collaboration and problem-solving. These steps include:
Building a Consultative Relationship: The consultant establishes trust
and collaboration with the client, understanding their needs.
Diagnosing the Situation: The consultant thoroughly assesses the
current situation or problem.
Feedback and Reflection: The consultant provides feedback and
encourages the client to explore new perspectives.
Joint Problem-Solving: The consultant and client collaborate to identify
and address the problem or improvement opportunity.
Skill Development and Capacity Building: The consultant helps the
client enhance their skills and knowledge.
Implementation and Evaluation: The consultant supports the client in
implementing solutions and evaluates their effectiveness.
Closure and Follow-Up: The consultant ensures a smooth transition
and may provide recommendations for continued support.
5. Survey Feedback
Survey feedback is a valuable process that enables organizations to gather
insights and promote open communication. It involves collecting feedback
from individuals through surveys or questionnaires, covering topics like job
satisfaction, communication effectiveness, leadership, and organizational
culture. Once the surveys are completed, the data is carefully analyzed to
identify patterns and areas for improvement. The findings are then shared
with participants and stakeholders in feedback sessions or reports. It serves
multiple purposes and provides individuals with a platform to express their
thoughts and suggestions in a structured manner. It also helps
organizations gain valuable insights into the experiences and perceptions of
their employees or members, enabling them to identify strengths and areas
that need attention.
This OD technique involves a systematic approach with the following steps:
Data Collection: Comprehensive data is gathered through a
questionnaire that covers various aspects of the organizational climate,
such as decision-making, coordination, employee satisfaction,
leadership, and more. The questionnaire is designed to provide
valuable insights.
Feedback: The collected information and key findings are shared with
the participants constructively. Group discussions and problem-solving
sessions create a supportive environment for feedback sharing.
Action Plan Development: Based on the diagnosis, a collaborative
action plan is developed to address the identified issues. Participants
actively contribute their insights and expertise, ensuring a sense of
ownership and commitment.
Follow-up: The action plan is put into action, and its progress is
continually monitored. Regular check-ins and evaluations provide
opportunities for course correction and improvement. If needed, a
follow-up survey can be conducted to measure the effectiveness of the
interventions.
By following these steps, organizations can gather valuable data, provide
meaningful feedback, foster collaborative problem-solving, and ensure the
implementation of targeted action plans. This approach empowers
participants, promotes organizational growth, and facilitates positive change.
6. Third-Party Peace-making
This inter-group intervention aims to facilitate conflict resolution between
groups through the involvement of a third party, often a consultant. The
consultant plays a critical role as a mediator by conducting a thorough
analysis of the problem and effectively gathering information from both
groups. They then ensure that the information is conveyed suitably,
promoting understanding and dialogue between the conflicting parties. In
the final phase, the groups or their representatives come together to
collaboratively address and resolve the inter-group issues. The consultant’s
guidance and expertise help steer the discussions toward a productive and
positive outcome.
The concept of third-party peace-making, pioneered by Richard Walton,
centres around employing a management consultant to diagnose and
resolve conflicts between two individuals. This approach is particularly
relevant when conflicts arise due to substantive issues such as policies and
procedures. In such cases, the involvement of a neutral third party is
essential for facilitating bargaining and problem-solving, leading to a
mutually beneficial resolution.
Four operational strategies may be adopted for handling the conflict:
Parties can mitigate conflict by reducing the frequency of meetings and
discussions centred around contentious issues. This approach
encourages individuals to exercise restraint in expressing their views,
fostering a calmer and more harmonious atmosphere.
During meetings, participants can be encouraged to practice self-
restraint when sharing their opinions. This promotes active listening
and thoughtful communication, reducing the likelihood of conflicts
escalating.
Employing coping mechanisms like showing empathy and exploring
alternative approaches within the organization can help prevent
conflicts from intensifying. By considering different perspectives and
finding alternative ways to accomplish tasks, parties can avoid
unnecessary friction.
A comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the conflict,
including the emotions and concerns of the involved parties, is
conducted. Based on this analysis, a consultant can facilitate an open
and constructive dialogue between the parties, aiming to find a
resolution to the conflict.
8. Management by Objective
Management by Objectives (MBO) is a comprehensive managerial
philosophy that promotes collaborative goal-setting and integration of
individual and organizational objectives. It serves as a valuable OD
intervention by providing a framework to address interpersonal and inter-
group challenges. The essence of MBO lies in joint goal definition, clear
delineation of responsibilities, and specific outcome expectations. Through
this approach, superiors and subordinates work together to enhance
performance, foster accountability, and cultivate a results-driven culture.
MBO creates a structured pathway for assessing progress and aligning
efforts with organizational goals, thereby contributing to improved
performance and overall organizational effectiveness.
Top 12 Process Improvement Tools to Enhance Workflow
Performance
THEORIES OF PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
3. Goal-setting theory
The goal-setting theory is a performance management theory that involves
identifying specific goals and objectives for employees before setting up a
system that tracks their progress towards those goals. Such goals are usually
quantitative so the employee can understand exactly how they've progressed
towards achieving them so far. The goal-setting theory often applies to
organisations that want to improve their employee's productivity levels. It
typically works because it gives employees a clear picture of what their
manager requires of them and how their manager expects them to complete
6. 360-degree feedback
The 360-degree feedback performance management theory involves a
method of evaluating employee performance. The idea behind this theory is
that multiple people can assess an employee's performance, rather than just
one manager. This type of feedback process involves collecting data from
four sources, the employee's manager, peers, subordinates and direct reports.
Professionals then compare this information to the employee's self-
assessment of their work and goals for the year. Managers subsequently
present the results of these evaluations to the relevant employee in a written
report, which includes suggestions for improvement. The goal of this is to
help employees progress.
7. Situational leadership
Situational leadership is a performance management theory that focuses on
the leader's role in employee engagement. It suggests that there are four
different leadership styles. For example, there's the supportive style where
leaders focus on establishing trust and confidence in employees. The
participative style involves leaders developing a team environment that uses
decision-making processes to ensure all employees have the skills necessary
for their roles. The commanding style is for decisive and assertive leaders
who expect high performance and accountability from their employees. The
delegating style involves leaders giving employees complete autonomy over
TED Talks: TED often features talks by thought leaders and researchers
who discuss strategies for enhancing organizational performance.
https://www.ted.com/talks/simon_sinek_how_great_leaders_inspire_a
ction/transcript
6. Utilize Benchmarking:
- Compare organizational performance metrics against industry benchmarks
and best practices to identify performance gaps.
- Benchmark against competitors, industry standards, or previous
performance levels.
- Tools: Industry reports, benchmarking databases, or specialized
benchmarking software.
7. Collaboratively Identify Improvement Opportunities:
- Facilitate workshops or brainstorming sessions involving cross-functional
teams to identify improvement opportunities based on data analysis,
feedback, and SWOT analysis.
- Encourage open communication and idea sharing to generate innovative
solutions.
- Tools: Collaboration platforms like Microsoft Teams, Zoom, or Miro for
virtual workshops.
2. Management by Objectives
(MBO):Introduced by Peter Drucker,
MBO is a management approach that
involves setting specific objectives for
each level of the organization and then
monitoring progress towards achieving
those objectives. It emphasizes the
importance of aligning individual and organizational goals to improve
performance.
3. OKR (Objectives and
Key Results):
Popularized by
companies like Google,
OKR is a goal-setting
framework that involves
setting ambitious,
qualitative objectives
and measurable key
results to track progress
towards those
objectives. It focuses on
transparency, alignment,
and regular review of goals.
4. Goal-Setting Theory by
Gary Latham: Building upon
Locke's theory, Latham's
research emphasizes the
importance of feedback,
commitment, and task
complexity in goal setting.
He suggests that
individuals are more likely
to achieve their goals when
they receive feedback on
their progress, are
committed to their goals,
and when the tasks are
moderately challenging.
5. Balanced Scorecard:
Developed by Robert S. Kaplan
and David P. Norton, the balanced
scorecard is a strategic
management framework that
incorporates both financial and
non-financial performance
measures to evaluate
organizational performance. It typically includes four perspectives: financial,
customer, internal processes, and learning and growth.
Strategic KPI tracking is a fundamental practice for any business that wants
to succeed through data. For that purpose, benchmarking KPI goals and
targets is the way to go, and it comes with a wealth of business-boosting
benefits. Let’s take a look at them now.
Consistency: KPI smart goals help you understand if you are on the right track
regarding various activities and strategies. For instance, you might see an
increase in income, but how can you be sure that this increase is enough to
meet your objectives in the long run? By setting clear and attainable KPI smart
goals, you make sure you are working towards a clear objective.
Efficiency: KPIs increase the efficiency of your business by helping you get to
the heart of any issue that is hindering your performance. In addition to
holding you accountable to your aims and goals, working with the right
performance metrics will help eliminate inefficiencies while boosting your
productivity.
Employee performance: Working with the right metrics and knowing how to
set them will increase individual employee performance and
interdepartmental collaboration. Armed with the right visual tools and
performance indicators, everyone within the company will have access to
insights that will lead to higher levels of innovation, as well as consistently
informed decision-making.
Competitive edge: Armed with the right performance insights, you will create
a culture of continual growth and evolution. In turn, you will accelerate your
commercial growth, boost your profitability, and gain an all-important edge
over the competition.
Goal Alignment: KPIs help align individual and team goals with
organizational objectives. By setting KPIs that are directly linked to
strategic goals, employees understand how their work contributes to the
overall success of the organization.
Data-Driven Decision Making: KPIs provide valuable data that can be used
to make informed decisions. By tracking performance metrics,
organizations can identify areas of improvement, allocate resources
effectively, and make strategic adjustments to optimize performance.
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpKvs-apvOs
2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i0QfCZjASX8
3.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLvby6pHU7GVbx_0i3eLzAVqBUYKq1CKm6
Several frameworks and theories are relevant to the formation and implementation of
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). Here are a few:
ISO Standards:ISO (International Organization for Standardization) provides various
standards relevant to SOPs, such as ISO 9001 for quality management systems.
These standards offer guidelines for developing and implementing SOPs to ensure
consistency and quality in processes.
Total Quality Management:TQM is a management approach focused on continuous
improvement, customer satisfaction, and employee involvement. TQM emphasizes
the importance of SOPs in standardizing processes to achieve quality objectives.
Six Sigma:Six Sigma is a methodology aimed at reducing defects and variations in
processes. It relies heavily on SOPs to define standardized processes and measure
performance against predefined metrics.
Lean Manufacturing:Lean principles aim to minimize waste and maximize value in
production processes. SOPs play a crucial role in Lean manufacturing by
standardizing workflows and eliminating non-value-added activities.
Business Process Reengineering:BPR involves redesigning business processes to
achieve dramatic improvements in performance, often leveraging technology and
best practices. SOPs are essential for documenting and communicating new
processes resulting from BPR initiatives.
Change Management Theories:Various change management theories, such as
Lewin's Change Management Model or Kotter's 8-Step Process for Leading Change,
provide frameworks for effectively implementing SOPs by addressing resistance,
communicating changes, and ensuring organizational buy-in.
Knowledge Management:Knowledge management theories and frameworks focus
on capturing, sharing, and leveraging organizational knowledge, including procedural
knowledge embodied in SOPs. Effective knowledge management practices facilitate
the creation, dissemination, and continuous improvement of SOPs.
Human Factor Theory:Human factors theory considers the interaction between
people, technology, and systems to optimize performance and minimize errors. SOPs
should be designed with human factors principles in mind to ensure they are user-
friendly, intuitive, and conducive to safe and efficient work practices.
Checklists: Checklists can help ensure that no steps are missed in a procedure. They
provide a quick reference for employees to follow and can be incorporated into the
SOP document or used separately.
Templates: Utilize SOP templates to maintain consistency across different
procedures. Templates can include sections for objectives, scope, responsibilities,
step-by-step instructions, and references.
Plain Language: Write SOPs in clear and concise language that is easy to understand.
Avoid technical jargon or complex terminology that may confuse readers. Use active
voice and simple sentence structures.
Version Control: Implement a version control system to track changes and updates
to SOPs. This ensures that employees are always referencing the most current
version of a procedure.
Collaboration Tools: Use collaboration tools such as Google Docs, Microsoft Teams,
or SharePoint to facilitate collaboration among team members during the SOP
writing process. These tools allow multiple users to edit documents simultaneously
and provide comment and feedback features.
Cross-Referencing: Cross-reference related SOPs or documents within each
procedure to provide additional context or clarify dependencies. This helps users
understand how different processes are interconnected.
Training and Documentation Software: Consider using specialized software
designed for creating and managing SOPs, training materials, and other
documentation. These tools often include features for version control, access control,
and integration with training programs.
Review and Approval Process: Establish a review and approval process to ensure
that SOPs are accurate, effective, and compliant with regulations or standards.
Involve subject matter experts and stakeholders in the review process to gather
feedback and address any concerns.
Training and Implementation Plan: Develop a plan for training employees on the new
SOPs and implementing them effectively. This may include providing training
sessions, creating job aids, conducting simulations, or assigning mentors to assist
with on-the-job training.
Harvard Business Review articles on SOPs and documentation of
business process
Most people think standard operating procedures are a strait jacket that limits
their flexibility. Yet in our increasingly complex world of work, with so many
possible decisions and steps, clever use of standards can liberate. They can
actually make it easier to tailor customer experiences at low cost.
Consider how standards are helping the Cleveland Clinic, rated one of the top
hospitals in the United States. As Chief Marketing Officer Paul Matsen told
me, “We use enterprise-wide standards. There is one marketing
communications team, and we work across all our institutes, such as heart
and vascular, or cancer. Having a single enterprise brand and image creates
organizational challenges because it seems as though it constricts autonomy.
But it actually creates freedom within a structure. For example, we are
building a development platform for the iPad, and defining how it will interact
with our electronic medical record system. When we resolve that for this first
application, then our people will be able to create content for other
applications using the same standard platform. Once you set up the
standards and platforms, you can do more, and you can do it well.”
Twenty years ago my friends Michael Treacy and Fred Wiersema asserted in
their HBR article “Customer Intimacy and other Value Disciplines” that leading
companies succeed by excelling at one of three “value disciplines” —
operational excellence, customer intimacy or product leadership — while
meeting industry standards in the other two. They predicted that future
winners would need to master two of these value disciplines. And the smart
use of standards, as at the Cleveland Clinic, is part of the answer.
I see more and more companies mastering “operating models” — that is, their
culture, business processes, management systems, and computer platforms
— that use standard work to drive operational excellence and also provide a
platform for tailoring customer solutions. For example, in a previous post, I
described how Tesco made major strides in its supply chain management in
the 1990s by applying standard process disciplines. It then added customer
insights it gained from its Clubcard loyalty program and online shopping data
to those more capable supply chain processes to tailor customer offerings in
local stores and online.
The traditional view that complying with standards is part of a rigid “command
and control” management system should be replaced with a new model:
clever application of standard work allows you to have both efficiency and the
flexibility to offer unique solutions to each customer. In my next post I’ll delve
more deeply into different kinds of standards, from checklists for safety to the
standard work that forms the basis for continuous improvement.
Reference:
https://hbr.org/2013/04/standard-operating-procedures-can-make
-you-more-flexible
Harvrd Business Review Article On Setting Organizational Grades And Salary Bands:
Why Your Organization Should
Use Salary Benchmarking
Summary.
In a growing number of states and countries, employers are not allowed to ask job
candidates’ salary history or even their salary expectations. That means employers
must find new ways to determine appropriate compensation. A key solution lies in
salary benchmarking — using aggregated market data to establish competitive pay
rates. Recent research in collaboration with a leading U.S. payroll processing
company revealed that access to robust benchmarking tools doubled the probability
of firms setting the “right” salary. Data sources vary from government-released data
to crowdsourced information on platforms like Glassdoor. Despite the availability of
various tools, ensuring that salary decisions align with market trends is crucial, not
just for compliance but also for retaining talent. As pay transparency grows,
leveraging high-quality benchmarking sources effectively can optimize employer’s
wage expenses and bolster employee retention.
Recent transparency policies across several U.S. states, like salary history bans that
prevent employers from requiring candidates to report their compensation or even
their salary expectations, have heightened the focus on fair salary practices in the
workplace. As a result, there’s an increased demand for strategies to determine
appropriate compensation. A key solution lies in salary benchmarking: using
aggregated market data to establish competitive pay rates.
Setting salaries is a balancing act: you do not want to offer salaries that are too high
relative to the market, because that’d be wasteful; but offering salaries that are below
market may make it difficult to attract, retain and motivate your employees. How do
employers find their sweet spot?
In a recent study, we developed a theoretical model to shed light on the demand for
salary benchmarking. In our model, firms know exactly how much value the job
candidate would bring to the table. The firm would like to offer the candidate below
that value to keep some of the value as profit. However, how much lower should the
offer be? The lower the offer, the better the savings. On the other hand, if the offer is
too low, the firm risks losing the job candidate to another firm — they may turn down
the offer, or accept the offer and leave shortly thereafter.
So, whether the company wants to make a more or less aggressive offer depends
critically on what the firm believes is the market value of the job candidate: i.e., how
much other firms are willing to pay for the job candidate. That’s where salary
benchmarking comes in: firms can use data on the offers accepted by similar
employees (e.g., with the same position title and industry) to make sure that their
offer is not too low, or too high, relative to the market benchmark.
Our research also provides empirical evidence that access to salary benchmarks has
a significant effect on the salaries that firms set. We conducted it in collaboration
with the largest U.S. payroll processing company, ADP, serving more than one million
firms and processing paychecks for one in six U.S. workers. In addition to the payroll
services, the company aggregates the salary data from their payroll records in the
form of salary benchmarks. Clients can then search for any job title they want in a
user-friendly way. It is one of the most advanced benchmark tools and is being used
by many prominent firms.
Our data covers the roll-out of the tool when it was first introduced to the market, late
2015, through the start of the pandemic in 2020. Our sample includes 584 “treatment”
firms that gained access to the tool and 1,431 “control” firms that did not gain
access to the tool but were selected because they shared similar characteristics to
the treatment firms. We studied the evolution of salaries in the treatment firms
shortly before and after they gained access to the benchmarking tool, and we
compared that to the corresponding evolution of salaries in the control firms.
Here’s what we found: let’s say that a firm sets the “right” salary when they choose a
salary that is in a narrow (5%) band of the median salary for the same position,
industry, and state. Prior to gaining access to the benchmarking tool, there was an
11.6% probability that a firm sets the “right” salary. After gaining access to the
benchmarking tool, the probability of setting the “right” salary increased two-fold, to
22.1%. This is compelling evidence that these salary benchmarks are truly influencing
pay-setting, and causing position-level salaries to converge across companies.
We also found that the effects of salary benchmarking are quite symmetric. After
looking up the benchmark, firms are less likely to pay significantly above-market,
presumably because it would be wasteful; but firms are also less likely to pay
significantly below-market, presumably because it would be costly in terms of
attracting, retaining and motivating employees.
For standardized positions, such as bank teller and receptionist, we found some
evidence of a modest increase in the average salary. If employers are choosing to
raise salaries for this group, it must be because they expect to get something in
return, right? For instance, bumping salaries up to market may allow employers to
retain their employees and save those pesky turnover costs. Our research shows that,
indeed, benchmarking improves retention. Among employees in these roles, the gain
of about 6% in average salary was followed by an increase of about 16% in the
retention rate over the following 12 months.
The payroll data show that high quality salary benchmarks sway employers to set pay
closer to the marketplace median pay, and that benchmark users benefit from a
boost in employee retention. But how exactly does one go about sourcing and using
a salary benchmark?
Salary benchmarks are wide ranging; some are created by the government and
others exclusive to the clients of consulting firms. Still others are crowdsourced data
from anonymous employees. For example, the U.S. government reports average
earnings at the six-digit occupation code, within industry and state, each year using
surveys of businesses and households. These data are highly representative, but are
released infrequently and at a higher level of aggregation than the sought after
position level information. Meanwhile, several large consulting firms offer exclusive
access to the aggregated earnings of their clients, often using proprietary
standardized corporate titles. Most recently, firms that collect salary information as
part of their core businesses, like ADP, have added user interfaces that make
aggregated, anonymized data accessible as benchmarks. And platforms like
Glassdoor have encouraged millions of users to volunteer their salary information
anonymously in exchange for seeing the average inputs of others at the position level.
Employers use salary benchmarking for a wide range of purposes. For instance, 54%
of respondents use benchmarking when setting the pay of new hires. Other popular
uses include salary negotiations (53%), setting ranges for specific job titles (90%),
and setting the salary for a job advertisement (41%). Employers also vary in terms of
how frequently they consult salary benchmarks. For instance, while some employers
do benchmarking for every single new hire (37% of respondents), the rest prefer to do
it for some specific new hires or for some specific positions.
Our survey data indicates that employers differ in which data sources they use. The
most popular option is to use industry surveys, chosen by 68% of respondents, but
hiring a consulting firm to conduct these surveys can be quite expensive, and there is
no guarantee that the survey data will live up to the expectations. If you do not have a
big budget, you may also want to try the second most popular option: free online data
sources (58% of respondents) such as Glassdoor.com. More recently, payroll service
companies have gained popularity (used by 23% of respondents and the fastest
growing source), which may give the best bang for your buck in terms of data quality.
Most employers, however, use a combination of data sources. While the majority
look at free online sources, on a scale of 1-5, HR professionals report that other
sources are twice as trustworthy as free online sources.
Labor market trends can sometimes change rapidly, especially in the post-pandemic
world. You do not need to check the benchmarks on a daily basis, but try to at least
do it from time to time — remember that information, too, has an expiration date.
Likewise, you may not have time to sit down to study market trends for every position
in which you hire. However, make sure to at least do due diligence for the positions
that are most critical for your business.
When using a benchmarking tool, you may feel information overload. Some tools
provide not only the median pay, but also the mean, 10th percentile, 25th percentile,
and so on and so forth. And some tools allow you to filter by industry, state, and
other criteria. There are trade-offs. For instance, filters can allow you to focus on
peer employers, but at the cost of smaller sample sizes and thus statistically
imprecise benchmarks. While the right approach depends on the context at hand,
according to our survey, there are some clear favorites: most firms (89%) prefer to
look at the median market pay or the average market pay, and the most popular
filters are by industry (87%) and state (84%).
We also gave the survey respondents an opportunity to share their own tips and
advice for salary benchmarking. Some recommended not relying on job title
information alone, but rather to pay attention to the job description to ensure it’s a
good match. Another manager suggested that, to the extent possible, you should
review the benchmarks regularly to stay in sync with the latest trends in the job
market. In the same spirit, one manager recommends being proactive — do not wait
until employees are unhappy about low pay and reach out to you, or you risk higher
turnover.
In sum, the pay transparency revolution extends to firms knowing much more about
what their competitors are offering. New high-quality sources have changed pay-
setting practices. According to our latest study, keeping up with pay in the
marketplace, and knowing how to use those sources, can affect your bottom-line
retention and payroll costs. And from a societal perspective, this is closing the gap
between pay across firms.
Reference:
https://hbr.org/2023/10/why-your-organization-should-use-salary-benchmarking
https://hbr.org/2021/02/youre-not-paid-based-on-your-performance