Use Process When
Use Process When
LESSON 9
Use process when:
1. There is no product
2. The process is orderly and directly observable
3. Correct procedures/steps are crucial
4. Analysis of procedural steps can help in improving the product
5. Learning is at the early stages
Use product when:
1. Different procedures can be used to produce the same product
2. Procedures are not available for observation
3. Procedures have been mastered already
4. Products have qualities that can be identified and judged
Mainly, there are four general STEPS in order to craft your own performance-based assessment. Those are:
1. Define the purpose of the assessment
2. Determine the skills, learning outcomes and taxonomy level
3. Design and develop activity or performance task
4. Define the performance criteria
Below are the different SUGGESTIONS in developing performance tasks and the ways of improving scores (Gronlund, et al., 2009)
1. Focus on learning outcomes that require complex cognitive skills and student performances
2. Select or develop tasks that represents both content and skills that are central to important learning outcomes
3. Minimize the dependence of task performance on skills that are relevant to intended purpose of the assessment task
4. Provide the necessary scaffolding for the students to be able to understand the task and what is expected from their performance
5. Construct task directions so that the students’ task is clearly indicated
6. Clearly communicate performance expectations in terms of the scoring rubrics by which the performance will be judged
McMillan (2007) CHECKLIST for Writing a Good Performance Task
1. Essential content and skills targets are integrated
2. Multiple targets are included
3. The task is authentic
4. The task is teachable
5. The task is feasible
6. Multiple paths or solutions are possible
7. The nature of the task is clear
8. The task is challenging and stimulating
9. Criteria for scoring is included*
10. Constraints for completing the task is included
LESSON10
Basically, rubrics are composed of the title, the dimensions, scale, dimensions/criteria and descriptions of dimensions.
Stevens and Levi (2005) enumerated the STEPS in developing rubric.
1. Copy the task description form the designed performance task and place appropriate title of the matrix
2. Set up the scale to be used. It describes how well or poorly any given task has been performed and determine
to what degree the students have met a certain criterion. Below are some of the commonly used labels for
scaling compiled by Huba and Freed (2000)
Sophisticated, competent, partly competent, not yet competent
Exemplary, proficient, marginal, unacceptable
Advanced, intermediate high, intermediate, novice
Distinguished, proficient, intermediate, novice
Accomplished, average, developing, beginning
3. Identify the set of criteria or dimensions which will serve as basis for evaluating student output or performance.
The dimension or criteria of rubrics lay out the parts and how tasks are divided into its important components
as basis for scoring the student.
4. Specify the level of performance by providing necessary descriptions. Description of dimensions allows both
the teachers and the students to identify the level of expectation and what dimensions must be given an emphasis.
LESOON 12
Level 1. Receiving (Attention)
It is concerned with getting, holding and directing student’s attention. Attention concerns the student’s willingness to attend
to a classroom activity and being directed by the teacher.
Example: Listening to the idea of others with respect
Verbs: ask, choose, describe, follow, give, hold, identify, locate, name, point to, select, sit, erect, reply and use
After the list of behaviors has been developed, the teacher needs to decide whether informal or formal observation will be used.
1. Informal or unstructured observations are used to make summative judgement. Normally open-ended, no checklist
or rating scale is used during this type of observation, everything is just simply recorded (anecdotal).
2. Formal or structured observations as compared to the other one needs a lot more preparation. Checklist or rating scales
are to be made since it will be used to record observations. The form is generated from a list of positive and
In using teacher observation method to assess affect the following can be good guidelines
• Determine behaviors to be observed in advance
• Record students important data such as time, data and place
• Record both positive and negative behaviors
• Have as much observation as possible
• Avoid personal bias
• Record immediately upon observation
B. Student Self-Report
Another good way to determine students affect is by directly getting information from them through their own self perception.
The most common direct ways are having interview and survey.
1. Student Interview. It is similar to observation but here, there is an opportunity that teachers may have \
direct involvement with the students wherein teachers can probe and respond for better understanding.
Trust is an important factor here to be able to receive true reflections of the students.
2. Surveys and Questionnaires are similar to the structured teacher observation however instead of teachers
filling out the forms, students themselves are the ones answering. Surveys and questionnaires can be
of two formats, constructed-response and selected-response format. Constructed-response formats includes
simple statement or questions like essays. Selected-response format meanwhile can be of either among rating scale,
semantic differential scale or checklist.
The following are the guidelines in constructing assessment tools for student self-report:
• Keep measures focused on specific trait
• Establish trust with students
• Ensure anonymity if possible
• Keep questionnaires brief
• Keep item short and simple
• Write items in present tense
C. Peer Ratings
Among the three, this is the least common method. Because of the nature of learners, they do not always take this activity seriously
and most often they are subjective in conducting this peer rating. However, when taken seriously peer-rating can be very effective since
students are the ones who are interacting with each other for a longer period of time. The two methods of conducting ratings are:
1.) guess-who approach and 2.) socio-metric approach.
Reminder
In assessing affect the following should be considered:
1. Emotions and feelings change quickly most especially for young children and during early adolescence
2. Use varied approaches in measuring the same affective traits as possible.
3. Decide what type of data or results are needed, is it individual or group?
LESSON 14 Different Affective Assessment Tool
Affective domain encompasses behaviors in terms of attitudes, beliefs and feelings. There are various assessment tools that can be
used to measure affect.
A. Checklists
It is one of the effective formative assessment strategies to monitor specific skills, behaviors or dispositions of individual or group
of students. Checklists contain criteria that focus on the intended outcome or target.
Checklists are utilized to make a quick and easy way to observe and record behaviors for evaluation, provide information to teachers
if there are students who need help and provide formative assessment and help teachers monitor if students are on track.
B. Rating Scale
It helps students understand the learning target /outcomes and to focus students’ attention to performance. It gives specific feedback
to students of their strengths and weaknesses. There are two types of rating scales, numeric rating scale and descriptive graphic rating scale.
C. Likert Scale
It uses the five-point scale: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Undecided (U), Disagree (D) and Strongly Disagree (SD). It includes series of both
positive and negative opinions towards attitude object with atleast 10 items.
E. Sentence Completion
This affective assessment tool captures whatever comes to the mind of each student. The down side however is that it take more time
in scoring than the other traditional format.
It is an essential tool for formative assessment. Teachers first determine in advance how specific behaviors relate to the target.
They provide clear definition of traits followed by listing of students behaviors and actions corresponding to positive and
negative dimensions.
Now these enlisted behaviors on the table above provides the foundation in developing checklist, rating scales and guidelines.
The positive behaviors are called the approach behaviors while the negative ones are called avoidance behaviors. Approach
behaviors are so called because they are direct, frequent and intense contact. Meanwhile avoidance are less direct, less frequent
and less intense contact.
After the list of behaviors has been developed, the teacher needs to decide whether informal or formal observation will be used.
1. Informal or unstructured observations are used to make summative judgement. Normally open-ended, no checklist or
rating scale is used during this type of observation, everything is just simply recorded (anecdotal).
2. Formal or structured observations as compared to the other one needs a lot more preparation. Checklist or rating scales
are to be made since it will be used to record observations. The form is generated from a list of positive and negative
behaviors to make it easy and convenient in recording.
In using teacher observation method to assess affect the following can be good guidelines
B. Student Self-Report
Another good way to determine students affect is by directly getting information from them through their own self perception.
The most common direct ways are having interview and survey.
1. Student Interview. It is similar to observation but here, there is an opportunity that teachers may have direct involvement
with the students wherein teachers can probe and respond for better understanding. Trust is an important factor here to be
able to receive true reflections of the students.
2. Surveys and Questionnaires are similar to the structured teacher observation however instead of teachers filling out the
forms, students themselves are the ones answering. Surveys and questionnaires can be of two formats, constructed-
response and selected-response format. Constructed-response formats includes simple statement or questions like
essays. Selected-response format meanwhile can be of either among rating scale, semantic differential scale or checklist.
The following are the guidelines in constructing assessment tools for student self-report:
C. Peer Ratings
Among the three, this is the least common method. Because of the nature of learners, they do not always take this activity
seriously and most often they are subjective in conducting this peer rating. However, when taken seriously peer-rating can be
very effective since students are the ones who are interacting with each other for a longer period of time. The two methods of
conducting ratings are: 1.) guess-who approach and 2.) socio-metric approach.
Reminder
1. Emotions and feelings change quickly most especially for young children and during early adolescence
A. Checklists
It is one of the effective formative assessment strategies to monitor specific skills, behaviors or dispositions of individual or
group of students. Checklists contain criteria that focus on the intended outcome or target.
Checklists are utilized to make a quick and easy way to observe and record behaviors for evaluation, provide information to
teachers if there are students who need help and provide formative assessment and help teachers monitor if students are on track.
B. Rating Scale
It helps students understand the learning target /outcomes and to focus students’ attention to performance. It gives specific
feedback to students of their strengths and weaknesses. There are two types of rating scales, numeric rating scale and descriptive
graphic rating scale.
C. Likert Scale
It uses the five-point scale: Strongly Agree (SA), Agree (A), Undecided (U), Disagree (D) and Strongly Disagree (SD). It
includes series of both positive and negative opinions towards attitude object with atleast 10 items.
E. Sentence Completion
This affective assessment tool captures whatever comes to the mind of each student. The down side however is that it take more
time in scoring than the other traditional format.