AI Agents From Copilots To Coworkers Historical Co
AI Agents From Copilots To Coworkers Historical Co
AI Agents From Copilots To Coworkers Historical Co
doi: 10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
Keywords: artificial intelligence agents; human-AI collaboration; generative AI; artificial general intelligence;
ethical AI
Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons
Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any
medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions, and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and
contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting
from any ideas, methods, instructions, or products referred to in the content.
Article
* Correspondence: sakibshahriar95@gmail.com
Abstract: This paper examines the transformative journey of Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents from
copilots to integral coworkers within diverse sectors. Beginning with a foundational overview, we
delve into the historical evolution of AI agents, highlighting key technological milestones and the
shift from simple automated tools to sophisticated decision-making systems capable of learning and
adapting over time. We explore the capabilities of AI agents, including problem-solving, predictive
analytics, and automation, and their applications across healthcare, business, and education,
showcasing their role in diagnostics, customer service, and personalized learning, among other
areas. We also address the integration of AI agents in the workplace, presenting strategies for
collaboration between humans and AI, and outline the challenges and ethical considerations that
accompany the development and deployment of AI technologies. A comprehensive tutorial
provides insight into the development process of AI agents, emphasizing goal definition, data
handling, algorithm selection, and ethical guidelines. We also consider the pathway towards
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and the societal and ethical implications of widespread AI
integration, proposing strategies for equitable and ethical AI use.
Keywords: artificial intelligence agents; human-AI collaboration; generative AI; artificial general
intelligence; ethical AI
1. Introduction
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents have
transcended their initial roles as facilitators of human tasks to become collaborative partners,
reshaping the way we interact with the digital world. Using AI, such software applications are
designed that perform various tasks, make decisions, and have the ability to learn and adapt over
time [1]. AI agents, through the application of sophisticated AI methodologies, are crafted to execute
a broad spectrum of tasks, render decisions with minimal human intervention, and exhibit a
remarkable capacity for learning and adaptation over time. These intelligent entities operate on a
spectrum that ranges from rule-based systems, which follow explicitly defined instructions, to
advanced machine learning models, capable of deriving insights and evolving based on their
interactions with data and the environment.
This paper aims to dissect the multifaceted nature of AI agents, delineating their development,
capabilities, and the profound impact they have across various sectors. By examining the historical
progression, technological advancements, and the challenges encountered in integrating AI agents
into the fabric of everyday life, we provide a comprehensive understanding of their role and
significance. Moreover, this paper aims to contribute to the academic and practical understanding of
AI agents by highlighting their application in critical domains such as healthcare, where they offer
diagnostic support and patient monitoring, business, where they streamline operations and enhance
customer engagement, and education, where they personalize learning experiences. Through these
discussions, we illustrate the versatility and transformative potential of AI agents. Finally, we address
the ethical considerations and societal implications of deploying AI agents, advocating for
responsible development practices that ensure fairness, transparency, and respect for privacy. This
paper contributes valuable insights into the ongoing dialogue about the ethical use of AI, offering
guidelines and frameworks that can aid in the responsible integration of AI agents into society.
Simple Reflex Agent: It is a very simple type of agent, and they can sense the current state of an
environment and work accordingly [15]. These agents typically wait for a perception and then
respond e.g., vacuum cleaner or a bar code-reader.
Model-based Reflex Agent: This type of agent can sense the current state of an environment but
also can sense what is happening in the surroundings. An example of model-based reflex agents is
self-driving cars.
Goal-based Agent: This type of agent tries to achieve a predefined goal by doing some sort of
decision-making. An example of goal-based agents can be shopping according to a given list.
Utility-based Agent: These are the agents who can choose the best choice from the available
multiple options based on a given criteria. Utility-based agents can perform tasks like controlling
house temperature, finding shortest route, avoiding traffic jams, and ensuring the safety of
passengers sitting in a vehicle.
Learning-based Agent: These agents learn from experiments, update their knowledge, and try
to reach an optimal result. Examples of such agents include spam filtering and car-driving robots.
2. AI Agents Capabilities
AI agents are also commonly known as intelligent agents, and they have a wide range of abilities
and skills that enable them to perform tasks independently [22] and interact with their environment
directly. These agents epitomize the zenith of technological sophistication, enabling the execution of
complex tasks with minimal human oversight. This section aims to highlight the extensive range of
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
proficiencies inherent to AI agents, elucidating their capacity to not only operate independently but
also to refine and optimize multifaceted processes across various industries. The capabilities of
modern AI agents include:
Perception: AI Agent has the power and the capacity to detect and decode data from a lot of
sources, like microphones, sensors, cameras, and text. In perception, the relevant data is gathered
from different techniques like natural language processing, speech cognition, and computer vision
[11].
Reasoning: A typical AI Agent can analyze data, derive conclusions from the data, and decide
based on logic, patterns, or preset rules [10]. Techniques like logical or probabilistic reasoning and
expert systems are employed to process the data.
Learning: Learning is another key ability of an AI agent [5]. By using machine-learning
algorithms, agents can detect patterns and trends, and find correlations in data to improve their
performance [13]. Modern AI agents use learning techniques like reinforcement learning, supervised
learning, and unsupervised learning.
Adaption: AI agents have an intended ability to adapt to evolving scenarios and changing
environments, assignments, or preferences [8]. A typical AI agent is flexible in changing its actions,
optimizing its performance, and providing the results in any situation.
Interaction: An AI agent can interact with other humans as well as other agents [17]. Tools such
as natural language processing, dialogue systems, and human-computer interfaces can assist agents
in communication. These tools help agents complete a job amid of inherent complexities of the job.
Problem Solving: The primary role of an agent is problem-solving by analyzing the data and
finding a suitable solution. AI agents have a seamless ability to solve problems from a wide range of
areas, such as natural languages, machine learning, statistics, calculus, algebra, etc. [1]. The problem-
solving agents can be of three types: automata-based, proposition-based, and predicate-based agents.
The automata-based agents are simplest and can process the simplest statements e.g., “draw a circle”.
On the other hand, proposition-based agents have more complex statements like “find square of x”
or “draw a line from X to Y”. Predicate-based agents are the most advanced form of problem-solving
agents. These agents can process even more complex problems such as “find all pairs of dice of the
same color” or “find the shortest route between two points.”
Predictive Analytics: The predictive AI agents can perform predictive analytics from historical
data [23]. They are trained on very large datasets such as documents, spreadsheets, images, audio
recordings, and videos. Supervised learning is commonly used in predictive agents. Applications of
predictive AI agents are quality inspection, forecasting, and security monitoring.
Automation: AI agents can also automate various tasks for humans [6]. Such agents assist
humans in increasing overall performance and efficiency of work. AI agents can multiply the
productivity of a business process by automating its cumbersome, hefty, and time-consuming tasks
[18]. AI agents can be used to automate the human resource section by restructuring the recruitment
process. Similarly, project management and business management can be automated through
autonomous agents. Other possible applications are finance automation, document management
automation, order management automation, and supply-chain automation [14].
AI agents are used in many tools and several industries [24]. They can handle a wide range of
complicated jobs and activities in various domains from autonomous driving and healthcare to
customer service and banking.
3. AI Agents Applications
AI agents are smart and intelligent assistants who have various abilities and skills used to
perform various tasks. In the medical field, they can help doctors to identify a patient’s diseases via
analysis of images and symptoms data. In finance, signals and alerts are triggered when it finds
something wrong with business or money. AI agents can speak with humans and give fast answers
to human queries. They can help humans when humans need help with anything online, such as
making plans or asking for something. In factories, machines are cleaned and repaired automatically
with the help of sensors and agents. AI agents can help farmers improve agriculture production and
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
also help in driving autonomous automobiles. In classrooms, agents can help in sharing knowledge
by providing lectures especially to meet a teacher’s demand and in clearing the concepts to the
students. In the next subsections, we investigate the role of AI agents and potential use cases in
several domains.
adds another layer of difficulty, highlighting the need for continuous innovation and research to
overcome these technical challenges.
10
11
Developers can develop, train, and implement AI agents in many domains and applications with
the help of these frameworks, platforms, and technologies.
12
13
deployment and reduce and minimize the detrimental effects on society implementation of ethical
issues is essential.
9. Conclusion
This paper has explored the realm of Artificial Intelligence agents, exploring their capabilities,
applications, and the profound impact they have across multiple sectors. From automating mundane
tasks to augmenting human decision-making, AI agents have demonstrated their potential to
revolutionize industries, enhance productivity, and catalyze innovation. We have investigated the
ethical and societal challenges of AI integration, emphasizing the necessity of responsible
development and deployment. Looking ahead, the promise of Artificial General Intelligence indicates
a future where the symbiosis of human and AI could redefine our societal fabric.
Ethical Approval: Ethical approval was not required because no personal data was used. Any analysis presented
were aggregated.
14
References
1. S. Franklin, “Autonomous agents as embodied AI,” Cybern. Syst., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 499–520, 1997.
2. E. Alonso, “AI and agents: State of the art,” AI Mag., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 25–25, 2002.
3. A. Lior, “AI entities as AI agents: Artificial intelligence liability and the AI respondeat superior analogy,”
Mitchell Hamline Rev, vol. 46, p. 1043, 2019.
4. H. C. Siu et al., “Evaluation of human-ai teams for learned and rule-based agents in hanabi,” Adv. Neural
Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 34, pp. 16183–16195, 2021.
5. P. Ponnusamy, A. Ghias, Y. Yi, B. Yao, C. Guo, and R. Sarikaya, “Feedback-based self-learning in large-
scale conversational ai agents,” AI Mag., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 43–56, 2022.
6. J. Insa-Cabrera, D. L. Dowe, S. Espana-Cubillo, M. V. Hernández-Lloreda, and J. Hernández-Orallo,
“Comparing humans and AI agents,” in Artificial general intelligence: 4th international conference, AGI 2011,
mountain view, CA, USA, august 3-6, 2011. Proceedings 4, Springer, 2011, pp. 122–132.
7. J. Williams, S. M. Fiore, and F. Jentsch, “Supporting artificial social intelligence with theory of mind,” Front.
Artif. Intell., vol. 5, p. 750763, 2022.
8. D. L. Poole and A. K. Mackworth, Artificial Intelligence: foundations of computational agents. Cambridge
University Press, 2010.
9. B. Hayes-Roth, “Agents on stage: Advancing the state of the art of AI,” IJCAI 1, pp. 967–971, 1995.
10. W. J. Teahan, Artificial Intelligence–Agents and environments. BookBoon, 2010.
11. V. M. Petrović, “Artificial intelligence and virtual worlds–toward human-level AI agents,” IEEE Access
Pract. Innov. Open Solut., vol. 6, pp. 39976–39988, 2018.
12. I. Nicenboim et al., “More-than-human design and AI: in conversation with agents,” in Companion
publication of the 2020 ACM designing interactive systems conference, 2020, pp. 397–400.
13. A. Vetrò, A. Santangelo, E. Beretta, and J. C. De Martin, “AI: from rational agents to socially responsible
agents,” Digit. Policy Regul. Gov., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 291–304, 2019.
14. E. Dunaj, “8 use cases of AI agents in workflow automation.” [Online]. Available:
https://rightinformation.com/blog/8-use-cases-of-ai-agents-in-workflow-automation/
15. I. Umarov and M. Mozgovoy, “Believable and effective AI agents in virtual worlds: Current state and future
perspectives,” Int. J. Gaming Comput.-Mediat. Simul. IJGCMS, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 37–59, 2012.
16. N. Jeenings and M. Wooldridge, “Applications of intelligent agents. Agent technology, foundations,” Appl.
Mark. Springer, 1998.
17. J. Kim and I. Im, “Anthropomorphic response: Understanding interactions between humans and artificial
intelligence agents,” Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 139, p. 107512, 2023, doi:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107512.
18. X. Luo, M. S. Qin, Z. Fang, and Z. Qu, “Artificial intelligence coaches for sales agents: Caveats and
solutions,” J. Mark., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 14–32, 2021.
19. R. Noothigattu et al., “Teaching AI agents ethical values using reinforcement learning and policy
orchestration,” IBM J. Res. Dev., vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 2–1, 2019.
20. U. Shakir, “From ChatGPT to Gemini: how AI is rewriting the internet.” Mar. 18, 2024. [Online]. Available:
https://www.theverge.com/23610427/chatbots-chatgpt-new-bing-google-bard-conversational-ai
21. N. R. Mannuru et al., “Artificial intelligence in developing countries: The impact of generative artificial
intelligence (AI) technologies for development,” Inf. Dev., p. 02666669231200628, 2023.
22. N. Chmait, Y.-F. Li, D. L. Dowe, and D. G. Green, “A dynamic intelligence test framework for evaluating
AI agents,” in Proceedings of 1st international workshop on evaluating general-purpose AI (EGPAI 2016),
a workshop held in conjunction with the european conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI 2016), 2016.
23. N. Muscettola, P. P. Nayak, B. Pell, and B. C. Williams, “Remote agent: To boldly go where no AI system
has gone before,” Artif. Intell., vol. 103, no. 1–2, pp. 5–47, 1998.
24. E. André, T. Rist, and J. Muller, “Employing AI methods to control the behavior of animated interface
agents,” Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 13, no. 4–5, pp. 415–448, 1999.
25. F. M. Calisto, C. Santiago, N. Nunes, and J. C. Nascimento, “BreastScreening-AI: Evaluating medical
intelligent agents for human-AI interactions,” Artif. Intell. Med., vol. 127, p. 102285, 2022.
26. M. Milne-Ives et al., “The effectiveness of artificial intelligence conversational agents in health care:
systematic review,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 22, no. 10, p. e20346, 2020.
27. S. Chandra, A. Shirish, and S. C. Srivastava, “To be or not to be… human? Theorizing the role of human-
like competencies in conversational artificial intelligence agents,” J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 969–
1005, 2022.
28. E. Han, D. Yin, and H. Zhang, “Bots with feelings: Should AI agents express positive emotion in customer
service?,” Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 1296–1311, 2023.
29. J. Peters, “Amazon is building an AI-powered ‘conversational experience’ for search.” The Verge, May 15,
2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.theverge.com/
30. G. B. Roba and P. Maric, “AI in customer relationship management,” in Developments in information and
knowledge management systems for business applications: Volume 7, Springer, 2023, pp. 469–487.
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
15
31. D. C. Gkikas and P. K. Theodoridis, “AI in consumer behavior,” Adv. Artif. Intell.-Based Technol. Sel. Pap.
Honour Profr. Nikolaos G Bourbakis—Vol 1, pp. 147–176, 2022.
32. M. Shrivastava, Learning salesforce einstein. Packt Publishing Ltd., 2017.
33. M. Spring, J. Faulconbridge, and A. Sarwar, “How information technology automates and augments
processes: Insights from Artificial-Intelligence-based systems in professional service operations,” J. Oper.
Manag., vol. 68, no. 6–7, pp. 592–618, 2022.
34. P. F. Verschure and P. Althaus, “A real-world rational agent: unifying old and new AI,” Cogn. Sci., vol. 27,
no. 4, pp. 561–590, 2003.
35. H. Min, “Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory and applications,” Int. J. Logist. Res.
Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 13–39, 2010.
36. A. Aldoseri, K. Al-Khalifa, and A. Hamouda, “A roadmap for integrating automation with process
optimization for AI-powered digital transformation,” 2023.
37. M.-H. Huang and R. T. Rust, “Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service,” J. Serv. Res., vol. 24, no. 1, pp.
30–41, 2021.
38. R. W. Maule, “Cognitive maps, AI agents and personalized virtual environments in Internet learning
experiences,” Internet Res., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 347–358, 1998.
39. S. Shahriar, J. Ramesh, M. Towheed, T. Ameen, A. Sagahyroon, and A. Al-Ali, “Narrative integrated career
exploration platform,” in Frontiers in education, Frontiers, 2022, p. 798950.
40. H. Chalupsky et al., “Electric Elves: Agent technology for supporting human organizations,” AI Mag., vol.
23, no. 2, pp. 11–11, 2002.
41. L. Chen, P. Chen, and Z. Lin, “Artificial intelligence in education: A review,” IEEE Access Pract. Innov. Open
Solut., vol. 8, pp. 75264–75278, 2020.
42. J. Bryson, W. Lowe, and L. A. Stein, “Hypothesis testing for complex agents,” NIST Spec. Publ. SP, pp. 233–
240, 2001.
43. G. Maragno, L. Tangi, L. Gastaldi, and M. Benedetti, “AI as an organizational agent to nurture: effectively
introducing chatbots in public entities,” Public Manag. Rev., vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2135–2165, 2023.
44. B. Baggio and N. Omana, “AI and the agile workplace,” J. Syst. Cybern. Inform., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 84–91,
2019.
45. P. Hemmer, M. Westphal, M. Schemmer, S. Vetter, M. Vössing, and G. Satzger, “Human-AI collaboration:
The effect of AI delegation on human task performance and task satisfaction,” in Proceedings of the 28th
international conference on intelligent user interfaces, 2023, pp. 453–463.
46. Y. Duan, J. S. Edwards, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big
Data–evolution, challenges and research agenda,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 48, pp. 63–71, 2019.
47. S. Shahriar, S. Allana, M. H. Fard, and R. Dara, “A survey of privacy risks and mitigation strategies in the
Artificial intelligence life cycle,” IEEE Access Pract. Innov. Open Solut., 2023.
48. P. Linardatos, V. Papastefanopoulos, and S. Kotsiantis, “Explainable ai: A review of machine learning
interpretability methods,” Entropy Int. Interdiscip. J. Entropy Inf. Stud., vol. 23, no. 1, p. 18, 2020.
49. C. Castelfranchi, “Modelling social action for AI agents,” Artif. Intell., vol. 103, no. 1–2, pp. 157–182, 1998.
50. Y. Chen and P. Esmaeilzadeh, “Generative AI in medical practice: In-depth exploration of privacy and
security challenges,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 26, p. e53008, 2024.
51. E. Mokhtarian, “The bot legal code: developing a legally compliant artificial intelligence,” Vand J Ent Tech
L, vol. 21, p. 145, 2018.
52. L. Wang et al., “A survey on large language model based autonomous agents,” Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 18,
no. 6, pp. 1–26, 2024.
53. M. Abadi et al., “TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems.” Mountain View,
CA: Tensorflow, 2015.
54. A. Paszke et al., “Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library,” Adv. Neural Inf.
Process. Syst., vol. 32, 2019.
55. F. Chollet, Deep learning with python. Simon and Schuster, 2021.
56. F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830,
2011.
57. G. Brockman et al., “OpenAI gym.” 2016.
58. W. Meints, Deep Learning with Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit Quick Start Guide: A practical guide to
building neural networks using Microsoft’s open source deep learning framework. Packt Publishing Ltd.,
2019.
59. A. Juliani et al., “Unity: A general platform for intelligent agents,” ArXiv Prepr. ArXiv180902627, 2020,
[Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1809.02627.pdf
Preprints.org (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 10 April 2024 doi:10.20944/preprints202404.0709.v1
16
60. K. Hayawi, S. Shahriar, and S. S. Mathew, “The imitation game: Detecting human and AI-generated texts
in the era of ChatGPT and BARD,” J. Inf. Sci., p. 01655515241227531, 2024.
61. A. Bozkurt, “Generative artificial intelligence (AI) powered conversational educational agents: The
inevitable paradigm shift,” Asian J. Distance Educ., vol. 18, no. 1, 2023.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those
of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s)
disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or
products referred to in the content.