Research PR2 G6
Research PR2 G6
Research PR2 G6
A Thesis presented to
Ma’am Cecilia Saldua
Subject Teacher
Practical Research 2
By
Group 6
1|Page
Effects of The Using Online Learning Platform in Teaching-
Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Copyright
GROUP 6
2021
2|Page
Abstract
3|Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………….…5
Methodology……………………………………………………………………..………………6
1 Data Collection……………………………………………………………………………………………….7
2 Sample Questionnaire……………………..…………………………………………………..8
3 Methods in Compiling Data…………………………………………………………………………….9
Discussion………………………………………………………………………………………….17
Conclusion………………………………………………………………………………………...19
Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………………20
4|Page
INTRUDUCTION
5|Page
METHODOLOGY
7|Page
2. Sample Questionnaire
In the questionnaires we categorized the effects into
different aspects such as Emotional, Mental, Physical,
Financial, Psychological, etc. In each aspect we will then
give questions that will be answered by choosing from the
4-point scale provided below. This is an example of the
structure of the questionnaire.
4 3 2 1
A.EMOTIONAL ASPECT
1.How intense is the effect of using online
learning platform to your Emotional Health on ○ ○ ○ ○
teaching or learning in the times of pandemic?
(If your answer is in the scale of 4,3,2 proceed to the
questions below)
2.If you experienced Anxiety during that time, ○ ○ ○ ○
How deeply affected is your emotional
aspect?
3.If you experienced Depression, How ○ ○ ○ ○
deeply Affected is your emotional aspect?
*example
8|Page
1. METHODS IN COMPILING THE DATA
0
Deeply Affected Affected Partially affected Not affected
Teachers Students
*Sample
9|Page
The data are then compiled to be calculated in
percentage. A chart is designed to illustrate the
results.
Total Percentage
Teachers Students
Deeply Affected
30%
25%
20%
15%
5%
0%
*sample
10 | P a g e
RESULTS AND FINDINGS
11 | P a g e
Over all, from the 18 subjects (6 teachers, 12 students) the
questionnaires came back complete and filled out with data.
Sample Questionaire obtained
12 | P a g e
Jack Daniel Balbuena
13 | P a g e
4-Deeply Affected 3-Affected 2-Rarely affected 1-not affected
Respondents
RT-1 2 6 2 0
RT-2 5 3 2 0
RT-3 3 6 1 0
RT-4 1 1 8 0
RT-5 1 2 7 0
RT-6 1 3 6 0
RS-1 4 5 1 0
RS-2 2 2 6 0
RS-3 2 3 5 0
RS-4 2 4 4 0
RS-5 3 3 4 0
RS-6 3 6 1 0
RS-7 2 7 1 0
RS-8 1 3 6 0
RS-9 1 8 1 0
RS-10 1 7 2 0
RS-11 1 7 2 0
RS-12 2 6 2 0
TOTAL-18 =37 =82 =61 0
180
RT- Respondent Teacher RS- Respondent Student
14 | P a g e
QUESTIONNAIRE DATA
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
4-Deeply Affected 3-Affected 2-Rarely Affected 1-Not affected
Teachers Students
4-Deeply Affected
70
60
50
40
30
20 3-Affected
10
0
15 | P a g e
DISSCUSION
16 | P a g e
Over all the questionnaire survey findings amongst the
subject of the research are most of them were affected by the
online learning-teaching, based on the data received there are
37% said that they are heavily affected in different aspects that
concerns the new way of learning. On the other hand, 82 % of the
respondents said that they are affected by it, gaining the most
number of data . 61 % said also that they are rarely affected by it
according the data gathered. lastly none of them said that they
are not affected at all.
17 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
18 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Allen, E. I., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking
online
education in the united states. Sloan Consortium. P.O. Box 1238,
Newburyport, MA 01950.
Brindley, J. E., Walti, C., & Blaschke, L. M. (2009). Creating effective
collaborative
learning groups in an online environment. International Review of Research
in
Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 18.
Brocato, B. R., Bonanno, A., & Ulbig, S. (2015). Student perceptions and
instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis of online and face-to-face
classroom settings. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 37-55.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9268-6.
Brown, A., Brown, C., Fine, B., Luterbach, K., Sugar, W., & Vinciguerra, D.
C.
(2009). Instructional uses of podcasting in online learning environments: A
cooperative inquiry study. Journal of Educational Technology Systems,
37(4),
351-371.
Bryant, J., Bates, A. J. (2015). Creating a Constructivist Online Instructional
Environment. TechTrends, 59(2), 17-22.
Chen, R. T., Bennett, S., & Maton, K. (2008). The adaptation of chinese
international
students to online flexible learning: Two case studies. Distance
Education, 29(3), 307-323.
19 | P a g e
Cho, M., & Rathbun, G. (2013). Implementing teacher-centered online
teacher
professional development (oTPD) programme in higher education: A case
study. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 50(2), 144-156.
Driscoll, A., Jicha, K., Hunt, A. N., Tichavsky, L., & Thompson, G. (2012).
Can
online courses deliver in-class results? A comparison of student
performance
and satisfaction in an online versus a face-to-face introductory sociology
course.Teaching Sociology, 40(4), 312-331.
Dunbar, A. E. (2004). Genesis of an online course. Issues in Accounting
Education, 19(3), 321-343.
Duncan, H. E., Range, B., & Hvidston, D. (2013). Exploring student
perceptions of
rigor online: Toward a definition of rigorous learning. Journal on Excellence
in College Teaching, 24(4), 5-28.
Durrington, V. A., Berryhill, A., & Swafford, J. (2006). Strategies For
Enhancing
Student Interactivity In An Online Environment. College Teaching, 54(1),
###
jdb
20 | P a g e